The Inaugural Scalia Lecture | Judge Frank Easterbrook: Interpreting the Unwritten Constitution
Вставка
- Опубліковано 19 лис 2014
- On November 17 at HLS, Judge Frank Easterbook, of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, delivered the Inaugural Justice Antonin Scalia Lecture at Harvard Law School, titled “Interpreting the Unwritten Constitution”.
Thank you so much for posting these. I'm not a law student yet but to be able to watch minds like Paul Clement and Judge Easterbrook talk for free and online is an awesome thing. Easily two of my favorite legal minds and I just stumbled on them here! Again thank you!
Easterbrook is great. Excellent lecture and exchange.
Fascinating, so grateful this is available to the public
Mr. Easterbrook would have made a fantastic Supreme Court Justice.
Scalia said the same!
Bush I made a blunder not appointing him to the high Court
@@yuanxu4473 would’ve been better than Roberts but probably not Alito
Alito has said that he is not an originalist
I respect this man. He is a good man.
Neither to agree nor disagree with your assessment, I would simply note that "good" is a relative term subject to different interpretations.
@@jimmiller8389 lol! Blah blah blah
Does Harvard even believe in the constitution?
Excellent discussion of the Constitution and non-constitutional rules.
Like Learned Hard, the fact that Frank Easterbrook wasn’t on the Court is both an anomaly and a shame.
To date, 20,710 people took advantage of sitting in a very selective room together, a room not available for most of our countries 200 plus years. If you seek after it, you will find it...knock on the door.
Legal Realism properly is an exercise in metaphysics rather than a stimulating introduction to politics. It hopes to provide insight into things like the coincidental growth of Big Tobacco and the fact that the Virginia Plan prevailed over the New Jersey Plan, or the fundamental tension between politicians and the very rich.
There is no tension between Mitch McConnell and the very rich.
@@mickfunny4185 Depends on who they donate to
... very thank you 'Harvard Law School' ...
The donor chooses to remain anonymous. How interesting.
Equality would be more than a notion
The equality of the space between which is a feature of the tool not a notion of people who apy it for self interest
Who would I talk to when it comes to Spying laws?
📚
Hello, to you honorable Judge, and professor, the comment is. Yet many of the federal court cases for the lack of member's of counsel like state court cases are taken by public defender's in each jurisdiction. Regardless of pro bono programs.
solution ?
“Establisheded” lol
Great video i really like Harvard law school and I man don't contract with any agenceys we have Rights not privileges from our creator when you contract with any agenceys we need to get clarification on what that contract is doing to man and woman they don't tell you that your natural God givivig rights are going to be taking away for privliges
Google topdoctor Yola
Education video
LoL
Interesting that guys like Easterbrook sound much more like an originalist in their speeches that you will ever see in their clearly non-originalist legal opinions.
Because judges (and to some extent also justicies) aplly SC precedents and not their philosophicacal theories.
From the school that started teaching Critical Theory, Critical Race Theory.
This broad sounds silly.
The magical stage bilaterally curve because driver weekly twist a a mundane forecast. godly, numberless melody
To date, 20,710 people took advantage of sitting in a very selective room together, a room not available for most of our countries 200 plus years. If you seek after it, you will find it...knock on the door.
Interesting that guys like Easterbrook sound much more like an originalist in their speeches that you will ever see in their clearly non-originalist legal opinions.