Nucleophilic Substitution Reactions - SN1 and SN2 Mechanism, Organic Chemistry

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 січ 2017
  • This organic chemistry video tutorial explains how nucleophilic substitution reactions work. It focuses on the SN1 and Sn2 reaction mechanism and it provides plenty of examples and practice problems. The Sn2 reaction is a second order nucleophilic substitution reaction where the rate is dependent on the concentration of the substrate / alkyl halide and the nucleophile. SN2 reactions occur with inversion of configuration and work well with methyl and primary substrates. It's a concerted reaction mechanism that occurs in a single step. The rate law for the SN1 reaction is given as well. SN1 reactions proceed via a carbocation intermediate and carbocation rearrangements such as the hydride shift and the methyl shift are possible. SN1 reactions work well with tertiary alkyl halide substrates due to carbocation stability. Carbocations are stabilized by means of hyperconjugation and the inductive effect. SN1 reactions will produce an unequal racemic mixture. The stereochemistry of both reaction mechanisms are discussed in detail. SN1 reactions work well with polar protic solvents but SN2 reactions work better in polar aprotic solvents. Solvolysis reactions are sn1 reactions where the nucleophile is the same as the solvent.
    Stereochemistry R/S Configuration: • Stereochemistry - R S ...
    Optical Activity & Specific Rotation:
    • Optical Activity - Spe...
    SN1, SN2, E1, E2 Reaction Mechanisms:
    • SN2 SN1 E1 E2 Reaction...
    SN2 Reaction Mechanisms:
    • SN2 Reaction Mechanisms
    SN2 - Test Question:
    • SN2 Reaction Mechanism...
    _______________________________
    SN1 Reaction Mechanisms:
    • SN1 Reaction Mechanism
    Carbocation Stability - Hyperconjugation:
    • Carbocation Stability ...
    Carbanion Stability:
    • Carbanion Stability
    Protic Vs Aprotic Solvents:
    • Polar Protic Solvents ...
    E1 Ring Expansion:
    • E1 Reaction Mechanism ...
    E2 - Test Question:
    • Zaitsev vs Hoffman's P...
    ________________________________
    E2 Stereochemistry - Newman Projections:
    • E2 Stereochemistry Wit...
    SN1, SN2, E1, E2 - Practice Test:
    • SN1 SN2 E1 E2 Reaction...
    Organic Chemistry PDF Worksheets:
    www.video-tutor.net/orgo-chem...
    Organic Chemistry 1 Exam 2 Playlist:
    bit.ly/3PKEApB
    Full-Length Videos and Worksheets:
    / collections

КОМЕНТАРІ • 261

  • @TheOrganicChemistryTutor
    @TheOrganicChemistryTutor  Рік тому +49

    Organic Chemistry PDF Worksheets: www.video-tutor.net/orgo-chem.html
    Full-Length Exams and Worksheets: www.patreon.com/MathScienceTutor/collections
    SN1 SN2 E1 E2 Reactions Test Review: bit.ly/3Bt4ghw
    Organic Chemistry Final Exam Review: bit.ly/2WCJ8GP

  • @liviachung7607
    @liviachung7607 Рік тому +113

    "let's not worry about stereochemistry in this example"
    I think that is the sexiest thing a chemistry teacher could ever say

  • @nizzlenotes3892
    @nizzlenotes3892 3 роки тому +1977

    Orgo 1 final exam tomorrow, and I know I'm not alone. For those of you cramming like I am, I wish you the best of luck. One final push, comrades. Let's do this.

    • @gigachad5029
      @gigachad5029 3 роки тому +38

      Its friking hard

    • @akashsunil7464
      @akashsunil7464 3 роки тому +26

      @@gigachad5029 its awesome its kinda like math word problem its like solving a puzzle just look at it as if its a puzzle and make up million possibilities in your head then analyze them closely then take the one which makes the most sense play the video and oh boy when u are right that feeling u get is so lit

    • @gigachad5029
      @gigachad5029 3 роки тому +34

      @@akashsunil7464 still annoying thi

    • @LizardMan-ek8ej
      @LizardMan-ek8ej 3 роки тому

      @Orion Jaiden Bot says what?

    • @dhruvavikas1632
      @dhruvavikas1632 3 роки тому +22

      i hate organic cant wait ti get this over with

  • @jasleendhillon8883
    @jasleendhillon8883 3 місяці тому +24

    I hope this man gets everything he wants in life

  • @drewruble8027
    @drewruble8027 4 роки тому +309

    dude, i just want to say your channels are literally the reason im surviving chemistry right now. Thank you! I watch your channel basically everyday.

  • @realdeal8452
    @realdeal8452 2 роки тому +308

    You teach better in 15 minutes then my "professors" who leave me so confused after 2 hours.

    • @kevinhan2581
      @kevinhan2581 2 роки тому +6

      Sure. Same for me. Professor said: you will learn it later on lessons. For me, It feels like pre-view and "waste" of time.

    • @conchadeconchos
      @conchadeconchos 9 місяців тому

      @@kevinhan2581dude the amount of times my proff said “keep this in mind it doesn’t make sense now, but it’ll make sense later”
      And half the time never comes around to what he meant. randomly he says “see remember what I told you this would make sense in a bit which is now” and elaborates nothing on the topic leaving it a mystery beginning to end.
      Recently it was nucleophiles before it’s chapter and bro swear it was some mind blowing thing we wouldn’t get yet. 2 weeks later it’s just e rich species. Niceee set upp.

  • @simrinsahota2398
    @simrinsahota2398 9 місяців тому +16

    I never skip the ads because that's the only way I can pay you back for literally making orgo MAKE SENSE! THANK YOU!!!

  • @jcarter7456
    @jcarter7456 5 років тому +496

    yea... im fucked

    • @tylerhorton7393
      @tylerhorton7393 5 років тому +12

      brandon mora I’m with you brother

    • @aaarhhh4341
      @aaarhhh4341 5 років тому +14

      i have my chem test in 5 hours

    • @chrisc1909
      @chrisc1909 5 років тому +2

      AAARHHH how’d it go?

    • @Tijnob
      @Tijnob 5 років тому +4

      @@aaarhhh4341 12 hours remain for me

    • @themillennialpa
      @themillennialpa 5 років тому +3

      lmfaooooo

  • @sqectre
    @sqectre 5 років тому +631

    @1:46 you say "the SN1 reaction occurs in a single step" For anyone else thatt might be reading this, it's supposed to say "the SN2 reaction" not "SN1"

    • @TheMOZADI
      @TheMOZADI 4 роки тому

      yes

    • @nkag545
      @nkag545 4 роки тому

      Yes

    • @PhoenixBlade538
      @PhoenixBlade538 4 роки тому +8

      I was wondering about that. Thank you!

    • @pfeliciano4062
      @pfeliciano4062 3 роки тому +1

      Yes, I just caught that as well!

    • @serenitylanclos2686
      @serenitylanclos2686 3 роки тому +9

      I wish I would've read this comment 30 mins ago!!! I had to pop out my textbook cause I was so confused!!!! Thank you! two years later lol

  • @edwinafrimpong1392
    @edwinafrimpong1392 4 роки тому +33

    You guys have no idea how I've been battling to get the Sn1 and Sn2 reactions. Thanks

  • @cynr6406
    @cynr6406 4 роки тому +167

    The amount of times youve saved my ass is out of this world. Youve basically been teaching me my whole college career. Thankyou ❣

    • @RA-il6yd
      @RA-il6yd 2 роки тому +1

      Im here starting college yes he is saving us FR

    • @nauwwww
      @nauwwww Рік тому

      What year are you in? Personally in my school (Belgium) I’m learning this during my final year of highschool so I’m wondering

    • @KRISHNA_12489
      @KRISHNA_12489 Рік тому

      @@nauwwww bro same but not from Belgium

  • @calebkimmel372
    @calebkimmel372 9 місяців тому +7

    organic chemistry tutor i would trust you with my child

  • @sahilagarwal7752
    @sahilagarwal7752 5 років тому +109

    I have to criticize a bit. Sn2 has 2 in its name not because it is second order overall but because it is a bimolecular nucleophilic substitution, emphasis on bi. Sn2 can occur as a pseudo-first order reaction in case of solvolysis(when the solvent is the nucleophile and is in excess)! But otherwise, thank you for this video.

    • @okayhaffy
      @okayhaffy Рік тому +11

      bimolecular literally means it is a second order reaction

  • @pilgrimsbrother3135
    @pilgrimsbrother3135 3 роки тому +6

    My Doctorate lecturer, I just take this opportunity to express my sincere gratitude for enabling me to pass my exams and cats. Actually, you are a hero to be remembered. I revised all the problems and guess what. Exam was just a celebration!!. Long live my master.

  • @satvikaputcha
    @satvikaputcha 6 років тому +14

    You save my life! I have to give in a test on this in like 2 days.

  • @Hannah-re7qx
    @Hannah-re7qx 2 роки тому +5

    Your videos make me understand everything SO much better than the classes I pay for do. Thank you so much

  • @benholliday7385
    @benholliday7385 6 років тому +18

    I might actually pass my exam so thanks, I was dead without this.

  • @aronpeter1486
    @aronpeter1486 Рік тому +5

    the best organic chemistry tutor ever

  • @karimmiller-green6676
    @karimmiller-green6676 4 роки тому +28

    Biology is my subject, i was never really good at chem, but watching your videos clarifies alot.

  • @basmamohammed888
    @basmamohammed888 6 років тому +12

    Thank you so much 😊,all the organic class’ students in class admire your teaching way.

  • @baptizedInFire27
    @baptizedInFire27 4 роки тому +3

    Ayo you’re such a legend. I didn’t understand shit in school and now after this video i understood most of it.

  • @user-or2om1dj2k
    @user-or2om1dj2k 5 років тому +3

    Sir you so amazing my teacher makes it more complicated n I came to a conclusion that chemistry is hard but u took me to another level

  • @vimch7264
    @vimch7264 Рік тому +11

    this is very useful. Thank you for the wonderful explanations as always!

  • @hunterlongbrake6268
    @hunterlongbrake6268 2 роки тому +4

    This channel is doing the Lord's work. Thank you.

  • @tarinipriyavabbalareddy5207
    @tarinipriyavabbalareddy5207 Рік тому +1

    seriously..just 18 minutes and concept is so damn clearrrr!!!

  • @rochanhm
    @rochanhm 6 років тому +13

    Wow! I love your channel! You helped me a lot with AP and now you're helping me out with even IIT!
    Thanks!!

  • @malane8541
    @malane8541 10 місяців тому +2

    Giving u my first born child

  • @anshulramprasad5869
    @anshulramprasad5869 5 років тому +7

    Hello! This was awesome, thanks alot for your tutoring!! It helps alot😁

  • @JamessProductionss
    @JamessProductionss 6 років тому +9

    thanks for your videos dude, very helpful!

  • @mingminglolrock
    @mingminglolrock 4 роки тому +9

    tbh i learn more from your videos than from my actual professor

  • @gloriamwenya193
    @gloriamwenya193 10 місяців тому +1

    Am going to write my exam today and I know this will help because I have been watching it since, thank you

  • @sajkdnsaklfhnj
    @sajkdnsaklfhnj 2 роки тому +1

    I love your videos, they're informative and kinda asmr lol thank you so much.

  • @jamesmiceli4985
    @jamesmiceli4985 2 роки тому +1

    Every winter this man re-emerges to save us from finals

  • @Konstinho
    @Konstinho 3 роки тому +2

    I hope you know how important your videos to us are. Thanks

  • @dvrsify1
    @dvrsify1 8 місяців тому

    I love this channel so much

  • @kei6400
    @kei6400 4 роки тому +5

    In your first example, isn't iodine a better leaving group, and thus a weaker base, than bromine? So the reaction will not proceed, or will at least favor the reactants if the reactions is reversible

  • @zaih13_
    @zaih13_ 9 місяців тому +1

    You're saving me in this first semester of Ochem

  • @joshjaba4464
    @joshjaba4464 3 роки тому

    this video helped me out a lot

  • @nkag545
    @nkag545 4 роки тому +2

    Thank you so much sir !

  • @zubaidakhan4132
    @zubaidakhan4132 4 роки тому

    Very good effort👍

  • @officialoops196
    @officialoops196 2 роки тому

    Its me from Nepal
    Your videos are extraordinary sir 🥰

  • @lizdyel172
    @lizdyel172 8 місяців тому

    Understood more in five minutes here than I did from 2 weeks (about 4-5 hours) of lectures from my ochem 1 professor. .

  • @tfee1243
    @tfee1243 6 років тому +124

    Good work, but it was very confusing when you switch from sn1 to Sn2 without saying anything so i cant tell which is which

    • @betelgueseromanicontidesu6671
      @betelgueseromanicontidesu6671 4 роки тому +27

      First look at the Alpha C. Is is a primary, secondary, or tertiary C? If it is Primary, it will always be Sn2 (minus a couple instances), if it is secondary you need to look at what you are reacting with and the protic/aprotic conditions along with the leaving group, if it is tertiary is always favors Sn1.

    • @yasssgawwwd5643
      @yasssgawwwd5643 3 роки тому +7

      It’s implied when we discuss sn1/sn2. The biggest thing to remember (what I learned) is that sn1 is usually a 2 step process while sn2 are 1 step:) hope it helps. There’s basic rules to help you immediately see the rxn that will happen when u see the reagent with starting material. So primary, sec, and tertiary substrates helps me know whether the rxn will proceed in either sn1 or sn2. Check the Carbon:)

    • @kuewayneennis9521
      @kuewayneennis9521 3 роки тому +4

      @@yasssgawwwd5643 bruh that message Is2 years ago, and he just made some mistakes in the video tbh said sn1 when he meant sn2

    • @k-l-a-r-a
      @k-l-a-r-a Рік тому +2

      ​@kuewayneennis9521 Yes! I was also confused because at 1:47 he says "The SN1 reaction." while he meant SN2! I hope there aren't more confusions?
      Also how ironic rn, your comment is 2 yo for me 😂😂

  • @aracelihernandez802
    @aracelihernandez802 2 роки тому +1

    I hope this isn't too forward but... I love you.

  • @tristan6773
    @tristan6773 6 років тому +3

    Substitution reactions prefer formation of the more stable base. Reacting iodine with an alkyl-bromide would produce no reaction. Please clarify this

  • @ua4788
    @ua4788 4 роки тому +1

    you are the best!!!!!

  • @beastypie99
    @beastypie99 3 роки тому +1

    For the last molecule, would it actually have 4 steroisomers? The methyl-substituted carbon is an asymmetric center, and I assume the methyl shift could add to either side.

  • @ahmadjarrad2635
    @ahmadjarrad2635 2 роки тому +2

    Why does the intermediate molecule at 14:21 let go of the hydrogen instead of the methyl group? What makes it more favorable? Why would the methanol want the hydrogen? Wouldn't it have to dissociate for the OH- to grab the H+ and become H2O, leaving a methyl ion CH3+, which is kinda unfavorable?

  • @BryanChege
    @BryanChege 3 місяці тому

    so helpful!

  • @kalei7599
    @kalei7599 3 роки тому +2

    correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure that the second example can only work with E2. SN1 does not work under strong basic conditions.

  • @lianasong9926
    @lianasong9926 3 роки тому +3

    hi not sure if you can see this comment since this is a pretty old video,, but im open to anyone who can answer my question: for 17:43 product, is it not going to be a racemic mixture just like the previous example since H2O is a neutral nucleophile?

  • @amoshunja5924
    @amoshunja5924 3 місяці тому

    Very helpful

  • @sal20Jets
    @sal20Jets 5 років тому +1

    have my natural products test on Friday haha

  • @adamusmani
    @adamusmani 2 роки тому +3

    preci preci i now have a girlfriend and a 102 in organic chemistry thanks to ur videos. also own a lamborghini and live in a gated community in the hills thanks to your hard work

  • @sarahmarcel9806
    @sarahmarcel9806 8 місяців тому

    THANKYOU LIFESAVER!!!!

  • @samli3294
    @samli3294 Рік тому +1

    does SN2 and SN1 work for alkane, alkene and alkynes or only for alkyl halides?

  • @remi4712
    @remi4712 5 років тому +11

    My exam on this is today 😂😂

  • @tg9521
    @tg9521 6 місяців тому

    I need to know this for a test in less than 1.5 hour. Thanks.

  • @FatimaKhazaal534
    @FatimaKhazaal534 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much

  • @jasontodd6850
    @jasontodd6850 5 років тому +3

    i tought I- was a better abandonat group than Br- . but in the video you use Br- as the abandonat group. i am kinda cofused. can somebody explain?

  • @jessicajane2400
    @jessicajane2400 Рік тому

    @7:48- how do we know if the Nu: attacks from the front or back?? I know that you said it should attack from the back and why, but is that always the case? Can you explain this further? Should it always attack from the back WBR the Nu: is a Br-?

  • @alondraherrera4170
    @alondraherrera4170 2 роки тому +1

    how do you know if it attacks from behind or in front

  • @1515Wong
    @1515Wong 6 років тому +4

    thanks!!!

  • @happypenguin64
    @happypenguin64 4 роки тому

    What type of stereoisomers are the molecules in the last example?

  • @RA-il6yd
    @RA-il6yd 2 роки тому

    THANK YOU OMG

  • @marycu9066
    @marycu9066 5 років тому +2

    Overall, this video is very helpful. However, I'd like to point out that at many points in the video, some terms are not very clearly pronounced.

  • @yousafilyas3987
    @yousafilyas3987 Рік тому

    What is the link to video that has 75 practice problems?

  • @lizardperson2293
    @lizardperson2293 7 років тому +69

    1:46 don't you mean Sn2?

    • @Oasix21
      @Oasix21 7 років тому +11

      Yes SN2 is Concerted single step, while SN1 is multi step.

    • @BeautyByIris08
      @BeautyByIris08 5 років тому

      That's what I was thinking too

    • @papaisduniyakapapa
      @papaisduniyakapapa 3 роки тому

      Does Carbonation formation occur in SN1?

  • @Ghost-pr4fq
    @Ghost-pr4fq 5 років тому +1

    at 4:05 you were drawing 2-bromo-2-methylpropane but as you can see that you made mistake for that methyl (to the left of this molecule.) C and H suppose to be switched or else I will think that the carbon in the center of the molecule is connected to the hydrogen and that hydrogen is connected to the other carbon which that is crazy.

  • @SI-23574
    @SI-23574 2 роки тому

    Why does the oxygen develop a partial positive charge instead of negative when bonding to the carbocation?

  • @GuineaPigLuna
    @GuineaPigLuna 3 роки тому

    My guy, you are a B L E S S I N G

  • @amantudu4233
    @amantudu4233 3 роки тому

    Thanks

  • @victoriaburns1721
    @victoriaburns1721 9 місяців тому

    god bless you

  • @Rheologist
    @Rheologist 3 роки тому

    Thanks :)

  • @jwolfman665
    @jwolfman665 5 років тому

    hello, from Andino's class

  • @kobyplays8840
    @kobyplays8840 Рік тому +1

    Not me checking how to do this 5 minutes before the exam 🎉

  • @moyinoluwaesther438
    @moyinoluwaesther438 8 місяців тому

    So, what type of nucleophile will determine if it will be a SN1 reaction or a SN2 reaction?

  • @NA-so1ke
    @NA-so1ke 3 роки тому +2

    Is this for the AS level?

  • @dharanidhara6992
    @dharanidhara6992 2 роки тому

    U said that "since bromide repels oxygen ....inverted product will be formed"....but this is Sn1 reaction so the leaving group have already expelled ...then there will be no repulsion for oxygen right ??? Kindly answer

  • @rna2165
    @rna2165 Рік тому

    شكرا .

  • @ro1882
    @ro1882 4 роки тому

    do your videos have any order and organization? I don't want to jump from one video to the next.

  • @khurramjaved2580
    @khurramjaved2580 5 місяців тому

    Hello
    How do you know what's front and what's back? Isn't that relative?
    Thanks

  • @adelapizha6885
    @adelapizha6885 2 роки тому

    the fact that i can understand him and not my professor!!!!

  • @kengchiaming6471
    @kengchiaming6471 Рік тому

    Any practice question for reaction with formic acid?

  • @sara-ie8ri
    @sara-ie8ri 3 роки тому +1

    hmm why these guys are explaining things to us on youtube?!! this should be my professor

  • @mekdelawitalemu1401
    @mekdelawitalemu1401 2 роки тому

    Is there any influence in percent of racemic mixtures if the bromine is put in front or at the back of carbon atom?

    • @NoOne-yv2ei
      @NoOne-yv2ei 2 роки тому

      No because all reasoning is reversed

  • @hendanbm6572
    @hendanbm6572 Рік тому

    Isn’t iodide weaker than bromide making it unable to remove it?

  • @NoOne-yv2ei
    @NoOne-yv2ei 2 роки тому +1

    There are a few strange things:
    1. I is a better LG than Br so it shouldn’t react
    2. Methanol is acidic and would not accept protons

  • @osasumwenoribo140
    @osasumwenoribo140 2 роки тому

    What else could replace this method ? -In case it is needed.

  • @nathankim5106
    @nathankim5106 5 років тому +1

    i love you

  • @zanapavlovic2611
    @zanapavlovic2611 4 роки тому +1

    I don't get how the bromide affects the water if it attacks from the front of the molecule, but not the back? It's all in the same solution, right? So, why can't the bromide affect the water if it's attacking from the back?

    • @bonbonpony
      @bonbonpony 3 роки тому +1

      It's not really about "front" and "back", but about "one side of the plane" and "another side of the plane". That carbocation is sp²-hybridized, so its geometry is trigonal planar, and normally the water molecule could attack it from both sides. But the negative bromide ion is still hanging around nearby, attracted by that positive carbocation, and partially blocking the way from one side for that water molecule. Therefore, that water molecule has still a better chance of attacking the carbocation from one side (the one without the bromide ion) than the other (where the bromide is still hanging around and blocking its way).

  • @chevybaseball10
    @chevybaseball10 4 роки тому

    For Sn2, what if both the nucleophile and substrate are halved?

    • @joshuagavaghan224
      @joshuagavaghan224 2 роки тому +1

      1/2 times 1/2 is .25. So multiply the rate by 0.25 or divide by 4, however you wanna conceptualize it.

  • @Rajeevnair1959r
    @Rajeevnair1959r 5 років тому

    At 17:23, Why isnt the other carbon chiral? Also aren't the two carbons 4° and 3° respectively? Someone help!

    • @Julian-pq4lw
      @Julian-pq4lw 5 років тому

      Well the 3° carbon is chiral and no because only carbon-carbon bonds count, so the 2° carbon is bonded with 2 other carbons thats why its 2° and the 3° is bonded with 3 carbons and so its 3°

  • @yusifabdulwahid2637
    @yusifabdulwahid2637 5 місяців тому

    How will you know a reaction is an SN1 or an SN2 reaction

  • @bty3
    @bty3 5 років тому

    14:22 why are we getting rid of the hydrogen? Also when we get rid of that hydrogen, why is that replaced with CH3 instead of CH3OH?

    • @TheACcam
      @TheACcam 5 років тому +2

      We get rid of H and replace it with a pair of electrons to return O to a neutral charge.
      For your second question, I think you may be looking at it wrong. H isn't replaced by CH3, that CH3 is there from the original CH3OH. He's brought in a second CH3OH to leech off a pair of electrons. He could have just as easily brought in something else for this, like OH. He also doesn't show the result of where H goes, which I guess isn't important for the heart of what we are discussing.

  • @Jayypee2
    @Jayypee2 5 років тому

    Can you please reply asap. Is 1:46 right or not because I dont understand

    • @killer-yv1zp
      @killer-yv1zp 5 років тому +1

      he made a mistake. SN2 reactions are always one step while SN1 are multi-step reactions. Hope it clears it up for you

  • @wubwub616
    @wubwub616 3 роки тому +1

    Could I have the references/source please?

  • @jacobchristensen6235
    @jacobchristensen6235 4 роки тому

    Why will methanol remove the hydrogen and not the methyl Group on the oxygen? At 14:18
    Is there any law on why it pick that?

    • @bonbonpony
      @bonbonpony 3 роки тому

      The simplest answer is: we've just done a nucleophile-electrophile reaction when that oxygen attacked the carbocation, so the next step shouldn't be another nucleophile-electrophile reaction, but an acid-base reaction instead. And acid-base reactions are all about giving/taking protons (hydrogen nuclei).
      Also hydrogens are relatively easy to detach, because they're very small when compared with any other atom. They can just lose one electron to the oxygen and leave when someone else offers them another electron. Bonds between carbon and oxygen are harder to break, because carbon is not very happy either when losing or gaining an electron.

  • @nelavinczeova7146
    @nelavinczeova7146 2 роки тому

    Wish me luck on my Chem HL exam tomorrow :(

  • @eliasgermer8762
    @eliasgermer8762 2 роки тому

    Thank you! But why does the carbocation forms? I mean, how come the carbon-bromide bond just splits?

    • @isaach8289
      @isaach8289 2 роки тому

      you dont really need to know those but it is because of the dipole interaction between carbon and bromine.