@@Drfresh1402 Not to mention overkill. Think the end user will pick up on the £500 worth of updates you've bought in the past 3 years? I'm on 10 standard, I bought it for midside distortion.
This is too true. Ultimate Vocal Remover is just as good if not better in some ways. ARA is pretty sweet though tbf. Not having to export tracks to RX is nice.
😆 Same as the UK, except just the sight of the sunshine regardless of the temperature creates the same result (and some people appear with shorts on when it's around freezing) 🙄
As a beta tester of RX11, i was very impressed with how receptive N.I.'s product team was to our opinions, critiques, and recommendations. The additions, in their full totality, are definitely worth the updgrade
I never felt that RX updates are worth if you go from 9 to 10 or from 10 to 11. The money just don't worth the small changes they add. + almost every time I try the the new features, 90% of the time I just go back to spectral repair and us it for 80% of the tasks :D When I worked for an organization I was always with the latest versions (maybe this was the time I felt the new updates don't give me that much to worth the money, and the most of the new stuff is just a marketing assets for Izotope to show something "new") :D Right now the only reason I want to update from RX 8 is because RX8 is working under Rosetta and the performance is slightly slow :(
@@JohnMarshall-NI Yep, i won't be updating and this is the main reason. I emailed their support several years ago about this and was told it's on its way.... still waiting several years later!!!! NOT GOOD NI!!!
I wished any of the beta testers would made a feedback on the lack of abilities you get when working with selections... At least I wrote a long feedback list 5 or 6 years ago for some great improvements when working with selections, but neither RX8, nor RX 9 nor RX10 nor RX11 brought any quality of life improvements here. Still can't click several regions to quickly add them to a selection. Can't move a range selection locked to a frequency. This frustrates me every day while working.
Since izotope and Native Instruments are one they completely lost the ground. I own all plugins latest versions and RX 10 Advanced and they offer me 350$ for a upgrade - seriously? sorry but for me this upgrade policy is unacceptable and need to boycott. For me this is a joke - esp. if you are a new customer you pay less .. sorry but … NO !
Much, much easier to subscribe to the Music Production Suite Pro. $200/year, you always have the latest versions, and you don't have to scour the internet and try to guess when the best deal will come out.
If I log into Izotope and go to my loyalty offers it's currently showing me Izotype RX Standard 10 -> 11 for £94.50, sale price. Is that too much? I guess they either have to charge a lot for upgrades or offer an endless subscription model.
I agree. I have RX 10, I use it to clean up studio dialogue and that's it. It already has the features I need. There's an arms race on stem separation software so why commit to something when there will be rapid improvement in that area in the short term? RX, while brilliant for so long, now seems too high-end in cost and specific in its feature set. Maybe i'm missing something? In which case I'm happy to wait until there's an obvious reason to buy. And of course next year when 12 comes out, they throw 11 at you for next to nothing such is their marketing practice.
I can't speak to their other software but the stems from RX11's music rebalance have way less artifacts than Acon Digital Remix, which is what I currently use for the same functions
Thats my prefered use too. But there's better stem splitters out there, even Moises still sounds better. Spectralayers seems to be way ahead. Lalai is a joke tho, stay away!
I think I use RX close to the way you describe, going back to version 6. For every guitar or bass part I record I start the session with a short noise sample as a separate file and use it with Spectral De-noise to de-noise takes before I start comping. Then I go through the final comp second by second manually removing noise and clicks using mostly Spectral Repair and Voice De-noise (works great on guitar and bass). I don't use any of the Assistant stuff. If I worked with audio that didn't have a clean noise sample I might try an assistant. I get the upgrades mostly to stay current with my macOS. If I was doing forensic work I'd get way more serious about the Assistant modules.
Updated to RX8 back then because of Music Rebalance - since then I checked every update, but there has never been a groundbreaking new feature added that would justify those upgrade prices...
Thank you for this comparison - I'm using RX8 mostly for extracting stems and music rebalance, and I wondered whether 11 would be any better - it seems not - maybe AI will revolutionise 12, so I'll wait and see... I love your setup! I'm from the '80s and wish I had an analog 24-track, which was the norm back then, along with big ol' Neve and SSL E-Series desks - yum! I used JH24s often and always liked their audio quality.
I wish Go Pro just had an adapter for a mini xlr.. Good solve is attaching a Tascam DR60DMK to the Go Pro, but it is kinda big. Still a really small rig though.
Still no ARA support for DAWs that support it. Very little in terms of new features since about RX8. High upgrade pricing, and basically no incentive to spend the money. I can Crossgrade to Spectralayers 10 pro for the same price as the RX11 standard upgrade. Or grab Acon Digital's competing software. Both of their competitors support ARA. Not seeing the incentive to keep supporting iZotope.
Had RX6. Rebalance is a major new feature and works well, other features are similar, but ML has made major improvements in some cases. Right now there is a decent upgrade price from RX standard or advanced.
Really great. I did upgrade. I am not sure I got my money's worth, but I am using RX10Adv to edit field audio, and it's working very very very well. Still will probably be working with the spectral forms down in the weeds for a lot of my noise reduction, but I'm finding your work with the bad mic in this vid very good. Je hebt me echt goed informiert, dank je wel. :)
I'm still on RX 8 too. Not sure I see a compelling reason to upgrade either. I work in dialogue editing, and I don't get why they haven't made De-plosive better. I mean plosives stick out like a sore thumb in the spectrogram! Where are your neural networks on that one iZotope?! Interestingly, some previously Advanced features are now in Standard - so plenty of Advanced users don't need to be anymore..
There are so many useful older tools in RX which could have been improved. On regard De-Plosive - I found the setting "Maintain Low Energy" as a very good starting point to remove plosives.
@@robertniessner554 Agreed. De-plosive does well with most low-level pops that live in the frequencies below the human voice. For those big accidental pops that can go up to 200-300Hz or higher though, I have to 'draw' them out in brush mode, which is as time consuming as it is simple.
A mastering suggestion from Ozone 11 advanced is cool, although I mostly never accept any of it 😂 A repair "assistant" makes little sense to me though, if you don't know what to repair, you don't need to fix it.
For the lufs graph part: Reaper recently updated with a really cool feature, short or momentary graphs on the clips. Really useful for quickly getting an idea of the balance
Sounds like you recorded your voice through a megaphone post processing with RX. Though I have had earlier versions of RX save recordings, I find the interface cumbersome and not always great results. My experience with RX 11 is about the same for extract, don't like the ammount of the artifacts. I find that most of the repair plugins have too many artifacts. I also don't like haveing to resort to the IZotope editor for full functionality of some of the plugins and the rendering time is glacial. Rebalance isn't fully functional as a plugin in Reaper but is ok in IZotope editor, it's slow even with an i9 based CPU and 64 gb RAM and I still hear artifacts. Unfortunately, it's still the best audio repair package out there.
The spectral RX editing tools are fine, but there are tools like dxRevive, Acon Dialog Extract, Goyo or Hush that work way, way, better than dialogue isolate. I was expecting a big update... but it has been somewhat disappointing.
bro i agree with you. DAWs are so far behind. what about something that let's you physically morph the EQ of every track without having to load it on every single track and 1 by 1 fix stuff
I think you'd want to have an opinion from field recording dude and a TV post production dude to tell whether the tools is nice or not (in this instance). I think it's awesome. If you think it's too unnatural then you push back the slider of that unproccessed track, right?
Because not always the dialogue should sound like it was recorded in a perfectly insulated vacuum and I know you understand that. They're supposed to have flaws and the ambient sound is supposed to push trough.
Yeah, the mediamod mic is WORSE than the built-in mics on the GoPro xD I only really use the Mediamod to get a line-in connection from my mixer when shooting guitar or drum videos for example
You've been able to do the loudness graph in reaper for at least 5 years using the SWS extension. The analyse loudness tool has an option to print the curves to automation lanes. It's not exactly perfect because your scale is obviously not specific to dB. I'm guessing it's just relative. The main thing it tells you is the shape of the lufs values over time. Which is basically what Rx is doing there. More importantly, it's free to reaper users.
I've got RX10 & was hoping and holding out for RX11 to see if it would at least match the abilities of Spectralayers 10, but the unmix on Spectralayers 10 is so much better.
Honestly I have RX7 and i'm not sure I would upgrade... Unless people here really confirm that the denoising,dialogue isolate, ai tolls, etc are better... I don't need more functionalities, I need these existing algorithms to get better and better at what they are already good at. Also, did someone compare the music stems separation (or music rebalance, etc) ouputs of RX10-11, Lastest LogicX release (11 ?), and Moses app ? Can consistant pattern can be drawn out of this comparaison ?
The adobe podcast tool (free) is better for this kind of work, the AI not clean your audio, it rebuild it itself with AI, its like vectorize your vocals. It means is not your voice anymore but you get a clean recording, for outdoors recordings its pretty good and I bet is not the same for music, but in the future who knows. Im an long time Izotope RX user of course.
I don't know if you do it like a joke or you are just used to repeat that ending, but each time is harder to understand due to speed and probably forgetting to say the whole words.
The GoPro media mod, it’s a janky accessory with a few design flaws. I’ve got the one for the Hero 8, and it’s a pain to use sometimes. It feels hastily designed without much thought about practical usability. Typical GoPro they always release products that are not quite ready and that feel rushed.
I have a question for you, I need software to remove voice noises, sounds for creating Audio Narration for ACX to pass the RMS Audio guidelines. And I'm told that RX10 Standard is the right one. Does RX11 include everything RX 10 has and new or it has different products?
I have RX9 standard . I mainly edit dialogue for video. With the latest Resolve 19 audio AI features. Im wondering if RX11 advanced is still worth it for me.
VST companies are following other big business models that also think THEY need to have yearly models like phones do, WE DON'T this should be simply patches or at most updates.... Getting sick of this shit that is everywhere now...
Right?! I got 11 this morning. $98 upgrade. Talk about incentive. And it sounds amazeballs (the crowd noise and brass separations..it's like they were made for my work).
I am finding that the RX11 new improved Music Rebalance is indeed better than the v10 version. It's separating those stems more cleanly, with far less chirping artifacts than earlier versions of RX . And the new Sensitivity knobs do indeed tweak your results for the better, if you experiment with them.
I had the same feeling, in what I have seen. RX11 seems as good as Ripx in stem separation, Ripx stems even sound a bit tinnier in an example I saw, having some ambience missing.
RX Advanced upgrade from 10 to 11 is way too expensive for the features. It would be worth the current upgrade price if they have included AI partial reconstructed speech synthesis. Adobe is miles ahead here.
For a more accurate test with the stem splitter, you should load in a shit quality mp3. RX is gonna have a much easier time with a higher quality file (eg - 48k - 24bit), as opposed to a terrible one (128kbps - 320kbps mp3 if you're lucky). This is how most people are going to use this feature (at least from what I've seen)
I'm still on RX8 and I honestly didnt like the newer RX's. They seem like stuff you'd patch in as opposed to make a whole new version. But its Izotope I guess. 🤷♂️
without watching the video, i can totally agree. just because izotope was bought by native instruments and (to me) they are famous for bringing "new" stuff out which really is not. imho they are one of the modern swindlers in todays (plugin) world.
Let’s be honest!) you was outside cause you are living in the Netherlands:) And these days were a quite sunny 🌞 Finally!) Hope all summer will be the same🫰🏻 Hello from Hoogeveen
That feature completely replaces a studio. Your issues are operator error. When you know what you're doing you see that you no longer need a studio and can record anywhere.
The iZotope upgrade policy is a scam. Have been a loyalty customer for many years... have been paying for any single upgrade/update at crazy costs. Not fair upgrade prices at all for long time users. This is enough, will stop trusting this company. Strongly disappointed, not happy at all.
@@Whiteseastudio I like silencer but when you're really trying to gate stupid tight it just isn't the right tool I don't think it does look ahead and it cuts off the transient. I've found that Pro G is better for that application.
They’ve lost their lead on stems.(rebalance). FL, Logic, Serato are all options now. There’s no king. If I were N.I. I’d focus solely on making rebalance prefect. As best it could be.
Can't understand why a M1 Mac mini is struggling to run one piece of Izotope software... It's hardly 'dated' tech. Why does it take so many resources to run?
@@Whiteseastudio I am German and used to live in Rotterdam for 4 years. Lovely people. Greetings. You can move to sunny Germany when the land is under...😃
A lot of people commenting on stem separation. I get why…but I don’t get why. What’s so important about having isolated music created by other people. Oh, I see why. 😂
In comparison to Accentize dxRevive these RX tools for voice sounds like a joke. iZotope is waaaay behind the others. I'm still with RX8 and the next update will be Spectralayers. At least it has reasonable price what cannot be said about iZotope.
so you record a very shitty and noisy vocal outside of the street with a very shitty microphone and you expect RX not only to do a noise reduction but to make your vocal quality better? That’s a shitty way to judge a plugin? as far as what it does no matter the quality of the audio it does a pretty good job.
we have the m1 mac mini for professional audio in my work too,.. yes, that is a little beast with an absolutely unbeatable price.. no Windows PC in this pricerange can do that job. The only reason why i bought a mac studio for my home was the physical slots and the bigger ssd in the standard version.
RX is overrated in general. Yes they used to be the best but there are now many other tools that do a cleaner job with slightly less CPU usage such as Acon Digital and Accentize, to my ear most of their software does a better job. RX just happens to have a couple of modules that no one else does yet, those are the only times I reach for RX.
Dialogue Isolate - worse than DxRevive Pro Music Rebalance - worse than free UVR5 ARA integration only in Logic and only via Rosetta emulation = a joke after NI released inferior Trash, it's not even surprising new RX 11 isn't any big step forward either -_-
I don't understand how rebalance is worse than UVR5. Can UVR spit stems like this and have them null against the original? Genuinely curious as I've never used UVR, but that doesn't seem to be a top-line feature.
For music rebalance (or removing unwanted bleed) that actually sounds very close to perfect, you should use the unmix function of Steinberg SpectraLayers.
I'm at the stage where I look at izotope updates like a new iPhone.
So useless and unreasonably expensive, right?
@@Drfresh1402 Not to mention overkill. Think the end user will pick up on the £500 worth of updates you've bought in the past 3 years? I'm on 10 standard, I bought it for midside distortion.
This is too true. Ultimate Vocal Remover is just as good if not better in some ways. ARA is pretty sweet though tbf. Not having to export tracks to RX is nice.
RX's results get a lot better if you do small changes many times, rather than one big change. Try running a 3 dB cut 4 times instead of 1 12dB cut.
That is a classic Photoshop technique too.
Have the same experience
correct. That's why older RX versions are also sufficient. No need for V11.
Yeah i love the Yamaha RX5 for those oldschool Depeche Mood drum hits.
Weather is above 15C INSTANTLY GO OUTSIDE. love the netherlads XD
😆 Same as the UK, except just the sight of the sunshine regardless of the temperature creates the same result (and some people appear with shorts on when it's around freezing) 🙄
As a beta tester of RX11, i was very impressed with how receptive N.I.'s product team was to our opinions, critiques, and recommendations. The additions, in their full totality, are definitely worth the updgrade
I never felt that RX updates are worth if you go from 9 to 10 or from 10 to 11. The money just don't worth the small changes they add. + almost every time I try the the new features, 90% of the time I just go back to spectral repair and us it for 80% of the tasks :D When I worked for an organization I was always with the latest versions (maybe this was the time I felt the new updates don't give me that much to worth the money, and the most of the new stuff is just a marketing assets for Izotope to show something "new") :D Right now the only reason I want to update from RX 8 is because RX8 is working under Rosetta and the performance is slightly slow :(
Did none of the beta testers request full ARA support for DAWs that support it?
@@JohnMarshall-NI Yep, i won't be updating and this is the main reason. I emailed their support several years ago about this and was told it's on its way.... still waiting several years later!!!! NOT GOOD NI!!!
I wished any of the beta testers would made a feedback on the lack of abilities you get when working with selections... At least I wrote a long feedback list 5 or 6 years ago for some great improvements when working with selections, but neither RX8, nor RX 9 nor RX10 nor RX11 brought any quality of life improvements here. Still can't click several regions to quickly add them to a selection. Can't move a range selection locked to a frequency. This frustrates me every day while working.
Running RX10 for audio post production; although very important, don't think it's time to upgrade just yet..
Haha same here !
I'll probably wait for 12 or even 13, RX10 still serves me very well.
Since izotope and Native Instruments are one they completely lost the ground. I own all plugins latest versions and RX 10 Advanced and they offer me 350$ for a upgrade - seriously? sorry but for me this upgrade policy is unacceptable and need to boycott. For me this is a joke - esp. if you are a new customer you pay less .. sorry but … NO !
Same here … maybe it will become more affordable in 6 months, just before the launch of RX12. 🙄
Just wait, your offer will come!
Much, much easier to subscribe to the Music Production Suite Pro. $200/year, you always have the latest versions, and you don't have to scour the internet and try to guess when the best deal will come out.
I don’t remember Izotope updates being this expensive. I’ll wait for a Black Friday sale, hopefully.
If I log into Izotope and go to my loyalty offers it's currently showing me Izotype RX Standard 10 -> 11 for £94.50, sale price. Is that too much? I guess they either have to charge a lot for upgrades or offer an endless subscription model.
I just do the endless subscription shit. It sucks once per year but otherwise I get RX, Ozone, and a bunch of other bullshit I barely use.
Right now this is a hard "NO" for me. The upgrade costs vs. new features aren't worth it. Perhaps I'll reconsider on Black Friday.
I'm still rocking RX7. Don't feel like paying again for the same software I already own and works fine.
We might not need it, but we want it!
I agree. I have RX 10, I use it to clean up studio dialogue and that's it. It already has the features I need. There's an arms race on stem separation software so why commit to something when there will be rapid improvement in that area in the short term? RX, while brilliant for so long, now seems too high-end in cost and specific in its feature set. Maybe i'm missing something? In which case I'm happy to wait until there's an obvious reason to buy. And of course next year when 12 comes out, they throw 11 at you for next to nothing such is their marketing practice.
Can you review stuff from Acon Digital? I think their audio repair tools sound better and are less intensive.
I can't speak to their other software but the stems from RX11's music rebalance have way less artifacts than Acon Digital Remix, which is what I currently use for the same functions
Impressive but RX10 still works well for me. Maybe RX12 will be the time to upgrade. Maybe not. 🤷I do like that optimizer though!
RX12 is probably 6 months away anyway. 😂
Been using RX 8 for live recording work. The things you can do now to reduce mic bleed and get way better mixes are off the hook!
Thats my prefered use too.
But there's better stem splitters out there, even Moises still sounds better.
Spectralayers seems to be way ahead.
Lalai is a joke tho, stay away!
I think I use RX close to the way you describe, going back to version 6. For every guitar or bass part I record I start the session with a short noise sample as a separate file and use it with Spectral De-noise to de-noise takes before I start comping. Then I go through the final comp second by second manually removing noise and clicks using mostly Spectral Repair and Voice De-noise (works great on guitar and bass). I don't use any of the Assistant stuff. If I worked with audio that didn't have a clean noise sample I might try an assistant. I get the upgrades mostly to stay current with my macOS. If I was doing forensic work I'd get way more serious about the Assistant modules.
Updated to RX8 back then because of Music Rebalance - since then I checked every update, but there has never been a groundbreaking new feature added that would justify those upgrade prices...
Thank you for this comparison - I'm using RX8 mostly for extracting stems and music rebalance, and I wondered whether 11 would be any better - it seems not - maybe AI will revolutionise 12, so I'll wait and see... I love your setup! I'm from the '80s and wish I had an analog 24-track, which was the norm back then, along with big ol' Neve and SSL E-Series desks - yum! I used JH24s often and always liked their audio quality.
I wish Go Pro just had an adapter for a mini xlr.. Good solve is attaching a Tascam DR60DMK to the Go Pro, but it is kinda big. Still a really small rig though.
Love your channel, great honest opinions and great reviews before we buy thank you!
That's not enough new features to justify a new version. Those are just updates
PREACH!
Still no ARA support for DAWs that support it. Very little in terms of new features since about RX8. High upgrade pricing, and basically no incentive to spend the money. I can Crossgrade to Spectralayers 10 pro for the same price as the RX11 standard upgrade. Or grab Acon Digital's competing software. Both of their competitors support ARA. Not seeing the incentive to keep supporting iZotope.
I think I tried to convince you to upgrade a few years ago. I got nothing this time. I’m skipping this one too.
Had RX6. Rebalance is a major new feature and works well, other features are similar, but ML has made major improvements in some cases. Right now there is a decent upgrade price from RX standard or advanced.
329 euro special offer for a upgrade from 10 ADV to 11 ADV, that is still a lot.
Drop the 3 and it would be reasonable.
Yup..I have 10 adv and want to find a good reason to upgrade. A lot of money for sure. Still on the fence a bit longer...
Really great. I did upgrade. I am not sure I got my money's worth, but I am using RX10Adv to edit field audio, and it's working very very very well. Still will probably be working with the spectral forms down in the weeds for a lot of my noise reduction, but I'm finding your work with the bad mic in this vid very good. Je hebt me echt goed informiert, dank je wel. :)
Upgraded to Post-Production Suite from RX7 Standard so I guess it was worth it.
I'm still on RX 8 too. Not sure I see a compelling reason to upgrade either.
I work in dialogue editing, and I don't get why they haven't made De-plosive better. I mean plosives stick out like a sore thumb in the spectrogram! Where are your neural networks on that one iZotope?!
Interestingly, some previously Advanced features are now in Standard - so plenty of Advanced users don't need to be anymore..
There are so many useful older tools in RX which could have been improved.
On regard De-Plosive - I found the setting "Maintain Low Energy" as a very good starting point to remove plosives.
@@robertniessner554 Agreed. De-plosive does well with most low-level pops that live in the frequencies below the human voice. For those big accidental pops that can go up to 200-300Hz or higher though, I have to 'draw' them out in brush mode, which is as time consuming as it is simple.
@@AndyMaherVoicePro Just an idea: Have you tried using the "Find similar event" tool?
A mastering suggestion from Ozone 11 advanced is cool, although I mostly never accept any of it 😂 A repair "assistant" makes little sense to me though, if you don't know what to repair, you don't need to fix it.
For the lufs graph part: Reaper recently updated with a really cool feature, short or momentary graphs on the clips. Really useful for quickly getting an idea of the balance
Sounds like you recorded your voice through a megaphone post processing with RX. Though I have had earlier versions of RX save recordings, I find the interface cumbersome and not always great results. My experience with RX 11 is about the same for extract, don't like the ammount of the artifacts. I find that most of the repair plugins have too many artifacts. I also don't like haveing to resort to the IZotope editor for full functionality of some of the plugins and the rendering time is glacial. Rebalance isn't fully functional as a plugin in Reaper but is ok in IZotope editor, it's slow even with an i9 based CPU and 64 gb RAM and I still hear artifacts. Unfortunately, it's still the best audio repair package out there.
The spectral RX editing tools are fine, but there are tools like dxRevive, Acon Dialog Extract, Goyo or Hush that work way, way, better than dialogue isolate. I was expecting a big update... but it has been somewhat disappointing.
bro i agree with you. DAWs are so far behind. what about something that let's you physically morph the EQ of every track without having to load it on every single track and 1 by 1 fix stuff
I think you'd want to have an opinion from field recording dude and a TV post production dude to tell whether the tools is nice or not (in this instance). I think it's awesome. If you think it's too unnatural then you push back the slider of that unproccessed track, right?
Because not always the dialogue should sound like it was recorded in a perfectly insulated vacuum and I know you understand that. They're supposed to have flaws and the ambient sound is supposed to push trough.
Yeah, the mediamod mic is WORSE than the built-in mics on the GoPro xD
I only really use the Mediamod to get a line-in connection from my mixer when shooting guitar or drum videos for example
You've been able to do the loudness graph in reaper for at least 5 years using the SWS extension. The analyse loudness tool has an option to print the curves to automation lanes. It's not exactly perfect because your scale is obviously not specific to dB. I'm guessing it's just relative. The main thing it tells you is the shape of the lufs values over time. Which is basically what Rx is doing there. More importantly, it's free to reaper users.
I've got RX10 & was hoping and holding out for RX11 to see if it would at least match the abilities of Spectralayers 10, but the unmix on Spectralayers 10 is so much better.
Honestly I have RX7 and i'm not sure I would upgrade... Unless people here really confirm that the denoising,dialogue isolate, ai tolls, etc are better... I don't need more functionalities, I need these existing algorithms to get better and better at what they are already good at.
Also, did someone compare the music stems separation (or music rebalance, etc) ouputs of RX10-11, Lastest LogicX release (11 ?), and Moses app ?
Can consistant pattern can be drawn out of this comparaison ?
The adobe podcast tool (free) is better for this kind of work, the AI not clean your audio, it rebuild it itself with AI, its like vectorize your vocals. It means is not your voice anymore but you get a clean recording, for outdoors recordings its pretty good and I bet is not the same for music, but in the future who knows. Im an long time Izotope RX user of course.
Could you use RX 11 to change the vocal levels of masters? Would it reduce audio quality?
I don't know if you do it like a joke or you are just used to repeat that ending, but each time is harder to understand due to speed and probably forgetting to say the whole words.
The GoPro media mod, it’s a janky accessory with a few design flaws. I’ve got the one for the Hero 8, and it’s a pain to use sometimes. It feels hastily designed without much thought about practical usability. Typical GoPro they always release products that are not quite ready and that feel rushed.
Try to get the SD card out of the gopro from it being in the media mod and you know enough about how bad it was designed…
I have a question for you, I need software to remove voice noises, sounds for creating Audio Narration for ACX to pass the RMS Audio guidelines. And I'm told that RX10 Standard is the right one. Does RX11 include everything RX 10 has and new or it has different products?
I wonder when iZotope will get thier apps working on iPad? I've switched from using PC to iPad.
I have RX9 standard . I mainly edit dialogue for video. With the latest Resolve 19 audio AI features. Im wondering if RX11 advanced is still worth it for me.
The new stem splitter in logic 11kinda works better from what i can tell so far
did you try both?
I would love to see a comparison. Stem Splitter saved my ass with a live mix already. (So much snare bleed lol)
VST companies are following other big business models that also think THEY need to have yearly models like phones do, WE DON'T this should be simply patches or at most updates.... Getting sick of this shit that is everywhere now...
Spectralayers Pro11 is going to Blown your Mind! STEMS ! Hint!
Interesting. I have RX 10 adv. Have you experience from both products?
Right?! I got 11 this morning. $98 upgrade. Talk about incentive. And it sounds amazeballs (the crowd noise and brass separations..it's like they were made for my work).
I am finding that the RX11 new improved Music Rebalance is indeed better than the v10 version. It's separating those stems more cleanly, with far less chirping artifacts than earlier versions of RX . And the new Sensitivity knobs do indeed tweak your results for the better, if you experiment with them.
I had the same feeling, in what I have seen. RX11 seems as good as Ripx in stem separation, Ripx stems even sound a bit tinnier in an example I saw, having some ambience missing.
RX Advanced upgrade from 10 to 11 is way too expensive for the features. It would be worth the current upgrade price if they have included AI partial reconstructed speech synthesis. Adobe is miles ahead here.
For a more accurate test with the stem splitter, you should load in a shit quality mp3. RX is gonna have a much easier time with a higher quality file (eg - 48k - 24bit), as opposed to a terrible one (128kbps - 320kbps mp3 if you're lucky). This is how most people are going to use this feature (at least from what I've seen)
They should have made the stem separation module a separate app years ago and leaned into that. Completely missed the boat.
I'm still on RX8 and I honestly didnt like the newer RX's. They seem like stuff you'd patch in as opposed to make a whole new version.
But its Izotope I guess. 🤷♂️
without watching the video, i can totally agree. just because izotope was bought by native instruments and (to me) they are famous for bringing "new" stuff out which really is not. imho they are one of the modern swindlers in todays (plugin) world.
Let’s be honest!) you was outside cause you are living in the Netherlands:) And these days were a quite sunny 🌞 Finally!) Hope all summer will be the same🫰🏻 Hello from Hoogeveen
6:40 LOL HAHAHAHAHAHAH
You should make a SpectraLayers 11 Review!
That feature completely replaces a studio. Your issues are operator error. When you know what you're doing you see that you no longer need a studio and can record anywhere.
The iZotope upgrade policy is a scam. Have been a loyalty customer for many years... have been paying for any single upgrade/update at crazy costs. Not fair upgrade prices at all for long time users. This is enough, will stop trusting this company. Strongly disappointed, not happy at all.
So rare to see you outside. Such bright skin.
Could you remove drum bleed with AI?
Like train it on the snare from the session that has no bleed and let the AI plugin gate it perfectly?
There are other plugins for that, for instance Silencer by Black Salt Audio, or Smart:Gate by Sonible
@@Whiteseastudio I like silencer but when you're really trying to gate stupid tight it just isn't the right tool I don't think it does look ahead and it cuts off the transient.
I've found that Pro G is better for that application.
Try Sonnox Drum Gate 😊
For cleaning dialogue, Supertone's Clear is way cheaper and surprisingly efficient
can you do a video review on the APU Loudness Compressor i would love to hear your advice on it
WTF, where is the studio?!?!? …. Ok, now it fixed 😂
Ripx vs Rx11 in steams separations?
They’ve lost their lead on stems.(rebalance).
FL, Logic, Serato are all options now.
There’s no king.
If I were N.I. I’d focus solely on making rebalance prefect.
As best it could be.
Can't understand why a M1 Mac mini is struggling to run one piece of Izotope software... It's hardly 'dated' tech. Why does it take so many resources to run?
Its about time for an upgrade 😳
@@Whiteseastudio It's 4 years old, what If it was a MBPro m1?
Great video! What's the name of the song?
Found it! King Sis - Femme Energy
Try adobe podcast voice enhancer! It s a game changer. Rx + podcast is 🤯 but why rx has nothing like adobe podcast?!
Are you actually still located in the Netherlands? You said the sun is shining...Did you move to LA?
Hahaha, no it was a rare moment in the Netherlands
@@Whiteseastudio I am German and used to live in Rotterdam for 4 years. Lovely people. Greetings. You can move to sunny Germany when the land is under...😃
Can you check out the new Spitfire AIR Studios Reverb reverb?
Bah!! You exist outside of that studio?? Terrifying thought. :)
I'm still on RX8 as well
You couldn’t have it learn your song before it exists, hence no plug-in doing this in real time
it would be interesting to compare it to the adobe ai
A lot of people commenting on stem separation. I get why…but I don’t get why. What’s so important about having isolated music created by other people. Oh, I see why. 😂
Thank you!
When RX can do what MAL does, I'll upgrade.
In comparison to Accentize dxRevive these RX tools for voice sounds like a joke. iZotope is waaaay behind the others. I'm still with RX8 and the next update will be Spectralayers. At least it has reasonable price what cannot be said about iZotope.
dxReveve is amazing. I use it all day long everyday. Dialogue Isolate in RX is not even close.
@@TimDolbear it's really a huge time-saver :) It saved me from many hours of laborious fixing very bad voiceovers. Waves Vx is also good.
Revive - I put it on nearly every vocal/narrative recording now.
Bro I’m still on Rx 7 I think 😂😂
The surprising part for me is that it nulls out during the null test 😱
true, I need to try it for myself
Elke plugin is useful zolang je weet hoe je het moet gebruiken. 'Nuff said
Voice isolation comes also with logic pro.
Cause you ddin't pay for ads on this channel!
why is the izotope rx11 so high on cpu
Was that Sandstorm by Darude? 9:44
Holy Lewitt that does sound nice outside
You are at sound vision...
Finally I extend my SSD Mac mini M1 256GB to 4TB without any integration in the box ;)
the voice isolator makes you sounds like you are talking inside a box
i'm still running rx 7 ...
so you record a very shitty and noisy vocal outside of the street with a very shitty microphone and you expect RX not only to do a noise reduction but to make your vocal quality better? That’s a shitty way to judge a plugin? as far as what it does no matter the quality of the audio it does a pretty good job.
mac mini m1 is your main studio computer?
Yes
@@Whiteseastudio wow
we have the m1 mac mini for professional audio in my work too,.. yes, that is a little beast with an absolutely unbeatable price.. no Windows PC in this pricerange can do that job. The only reason why i bought a mac studio for my home was the physical slots and the bigger ssd in the standard version.
Yep.
Waste of time.
Shame.
I really want a good sfx rm tool.
Reaver looks good, but it is still not there
I can hear somebody from GoPro crying from here
Comment for da algorithm
Streak count: 240
Almost at “a quarter thousand”
@@Whiteseastudio that's gonna take a loong time until we hit the 1000
I need to gear up video production?
@@Whiteseastudio Absolutely! Id love more video output
@@Whiteseastudio Two videos daily! Nicht mehr, nicht weniger.
EQ the dialog before rx processing and it will sound better
The thing sounds worse than the previous versions.
RX is overrated in general. Yes they used to be the best but there are now many other tools that do a cleaner job with slightly less CPU usage such as Acon Digital and Accentize, to my ear most of their software does a better job. RX just happens to have a couple of modules that no one else does yet, those are the only times I reach for RX.
Dialogue Isolate - worse than DxRevive Pro
Music Rebalance - worse than free UVR5
ARA integration only in Logic and only via Rosetta emulation = a joke
after NI released inferior Trash, it's not even surprising new RX 11 isn't any big step forward either -_-
So youve tried RX11?
I don't understand how rebalance is worse than UVR5. Can UVR spit stems like this and have them null against the original? Genuinely curious as I've never used UVR, but that doesn't seem to be a top-line feature.
@@mycosys yes of course, trial was available from customer area for about week now
@@GC-nd1lp yes it can, and can split to 6 stems
For music rebalance (or removing unwanted bleed) that actually sounds very close to perfect, you should use the unmix function of Steinberg SpectraLayers.