Start speaking a new language in 3 weeks with Babbel 🎉. Get up to 60% OFF your subscription ➡ Here: go.babbel.com/t?bsc=usa-influ-eg-dt-1m&btp=default&UA-cam&Influencer..Feb-2024..USA-TATAM..1200m60-yt-historiamilitum-feb-2024
Uh that statement you made about learning a bit of french before going to quebec or france wasn't the best thing to say. Completely different dialects. You don't want to learn canadian french and then use it in france. You'll get some weird looks at best and people will think you're a backwoods hillbilly at worst
Caesar dealing with the munity of the 10th legion is my favourite at a different time than one in the video . After 13 years of continuous war and service legions VII, IX, X and XII wanted their deserved retirement/money/land, the awards promised by Caesar during his campaign in Gaul and battles against Pompey. Caesar went personally into their camp and asked what they wanted. Legions doubled down on their demands which Caesar called their bluff, addressing them as Citizens instead of Legionnaires, saying they would all be released from service then went to leave. This caused such a shock among the dishonoured legion who were hoping they were badly needed for a campaign in Africa, they instead starting begging Caesar to reconsider and take them on campaign which Caser refused, stating he was upset the soldiers didn't trust his promises after all the years they had been fighting together. Eventually Caesar agreed to accept them back apart from the tenth whom started begging for forgiveness and even agreed to the mentioned decimation. When Caesar also forgave the tenth, he didn't put any rebel soldier to death but he found out the ring leaders and made sure in upcoming battles they were put in the most dangerous places Not only did he avoid munity, he actively had made the rebels beg forgiveness and were more willing to fight for him than before.
@@gomahklawm4446 Yeah well, you understand the inference though ... don't you, or does your obsessive compulsive pedantic historical reality checking pompous self-agrandising dismissiveness need congratulating...?
@@gomahklawm4446 Zoom out from your obsessive compulsive pedantic historical reality checking pompous self-agrandising dismissiveness and try and regard the comment as having a connotative meaning, seriously, the inference made has merit as a suggestive stimulus, it isn't meant as a literal historical connect, as in, make out of it, whatever the f-ck you want, if you can only see it within set parameters, that's on you, whatever you think you need to attribute to it, that's on you, not me.
Caesar was such a chad, he talked down the mutineers, who felt so bad about it they said they'd kill themselves. Caesar said nah, just don't do it again.
Unironically, IMO Caesar was by far the greates person who ever lived. He was a genius in every field - his laws where amazingly well crafted, he was a gifted orator, he was brave, he was a military genius, he was loved by his troops and the people, he was generous, he showed clemency, he worked very hard (not only in big areas, but in small stuff as well - maintaining the roads in earlier posts in his youth e.g.), He introduced a new calendar after several decades when nobody bothered to put the calendar right. He was a visionair who clearly saw the future of Rome and what had to be done to protect it. He was fair and generous not only to his peers but to the common soldiers and citizens in Rome as well. He protected them and their interests throughout all of his career, in all his laws he suggested. He never was interested in amassing wealth for himself, he never wanted power only because of the power. He wanted - and needed - power to make a change for the better, to lay a solid foundation for the future. Not for himself or some aristocracy, but for Rome itself and all its citizens. AND HE SUCCEDED. He made Rome a better place, he laid the foundation for Pax Romana, a long peace where everybody prospered. After decades upon decades of unrest and civil war he laid the foundation for peace and prosperity. Yes, it did not last forever - but no human can create something that lasts for centuries and millenia. We have other people who were great orators (Cicero), we have people who where great military leaders (Alexander). But we do not know of another human being that combined all the skills and qualities Caesar had.
@@wedgeantilles8575 I totally agree. The man was gifted in every capacity. His life story reads like the most interesting fiction I have ever read, but it is all true.
@@wedgeantilles8575On another thread just had a mini argument about how Napoleon was NOT a genius, more like a reasonably competent person, then ambitious opportunist which exceded his competence. He openly copied and emulated ceasar which itself is an admission to "I'm not as good as this guy but trying to" If your not smart enough to know the limits of your ability your not a genius.
Correct. Roman discipline and obedience to orders could vary quite a bit. It's a false image that persists just like Samurai being loyal and European Knights being chivalrous. The reality is not necessarily like the image.
Reading Roman history always shocked me about this. You have it in your head they are somewhat like modern volunteer Western militaries, since they were one of the few state militaries (and mostly volunteer) in the ancient world, then you find out what happens when the pay is late, the food ran out, they didn't like a particular commander/Emperor, got spooked by a superstition, or just plain didn't want to fight.
"My name is Maximus Decimus Meridius, commander of the Armies of the North, General of the Felix Legions and loyal servant to the true emperor, Marcus Aurelius...." 😳
Like mentioned on this channel in a video before, during the civil war 83/82 BC Pompey Magnus was ordered to Africa to smash the remaining forces of Marius. His fleet landed near the ruins of Carthage where some legionaires found a buried treasure, which sparked a mutiny, with the majority of the soldiers abandoning their command and going treasure hunting themselves. Pompey, who understood that he would not be able to stop this, spent his time going around and mocking and laughing at the soldiers and their unsuccessful efforts. A few days later his troops returned remorsefully to him and begged to be taken in again, their hard labour in vain had been punishment enough, which Pompey generously accepted.
After all, they were humans exactly like us. I heard once, from an ex military, those soldiers can have doubts regarding a strategy or command if it is unreasonable or too risky... He said "Of course soldiers can be afraid". I think this kind of nuances are important to know the history in detail and how it really was.
In the US military mutiny itself isn't the only crime, failing to suppress or at the least report a mutiny or desire for a mutiny is also covered by Article 94. The punishment is death or such other punishment as a court martial may direct Now a days bad commanders just get smoked by their own soldiers, rather than a full blown mutiny.
Imagine having your pay delayed for months at a time. Or perhaps years. British Sailors usually are not paid by the month but sometimes in years or at best in six months after serving at sea. Imagine that plus shitty situations and shit food. Who wouldn't? I mean, Medieval knights had a tendency to disregard a monarchs decree and even rebel despite being given land to tax and farm. Just look at hubgarian empire and see how shitty and army of knights can be when you really need them.
Well it’s just my guess but one thing is that the modern armies should be getting paid on time whether they are from a democratic or dictatorial nation. Everyone knows that if you anger the military they can and will seize control or depose a ruler. And for the case of the US military I can also think of how they do rotations when they were in Iraq or Afghanistan. These soldiers weren’t there for a full 20 years but served in tours of a few years at a time. I would imagine if someone were made to serve in a foreign land for 20 years would be quite dissatisfied.
5:39 talk about putting yourself in a weird position as a commander. He purposefully took in a legion with a history of mutiny & didn’t break them up (unless he did & it just wasn’t mentioned)
Thank you very much. I wish you had been around when I took Roman history in college in the early 80s. You've added a lot to my knowledge through watching your videos, Reading books such as Gladius, , and listening to selective podcasts. , I just have to say thank you very much
The exclusive use of IX for 9 was formalized much much later. The Romans used IIII or IV and VIIII or IX pretty much indistinctively. For example the gates of the Colosseum are numbered in this format LXVIIII
76 mutinies in sixty years is not that bad actually if you compare it with early modern European armies. The Spanish Army of Flanders had much more in half that time from the 1570s to 1609. I guess the Romans were probably better at paying their troops than the Habsburgs.
“Measured military punishment, together with a short and clear explanation of the offense, touches the ambitious soldier more than brutality which drives him to despair.” - Generalissimo Alexander Suvorov
Very nice video.I read that in many cases of mutiny,centurions and other officers that were hated by the men,were executed.What happened with the soldiers that executed their centurions?Was a general rule of how to deal with those men or it was a case by case scenario,with the general deciding what punishment he should order?
What the Romans had , that we lack today , is a sense of Honor ! Honor for Rome , their Legion , their fellow Legionnaires and lastly themselves . Very rare today !
is there any occasion where the mutiny legion just defected (or threatened to defect) to the other side, especially during civil war? Like the 9th just like "screw Ceasar, we will join Pompey"? also, what would be the centurion's role during the mutiny? Did they often side with the general, or they were the ringleader themselves?
I mean in Spain Pompey’s legion did defect nominally to Caesar since they didn’t really want to fight. I would say nominally since Pompey was in Greece at the time separated from his legions in Spain so Caesar probably just kept these guys in Spain to garrison it. There’s also the case when Octavian and Anthony had their civil wars. In the battle of actium quite a lot of Anthony’s men defected but I’m not too sure if it was whole legions or enough soldiers defected that the legions were basically defunct.
One of the things I admire about the Romans is the dedication to freedom of speech / complaints you were expected to be able to defend your position with logic rather than attempting to silence your critics. It may not be very comfortable to be shouted down by your critics when you walk into the stadium but it's necessary for a healthy civilization to address problems and concerns of the people as they arise rather than sweeping them under the rug to fester into a much larger problem. I think the lack of debate and rhetoric in the modern mainstream curriculum is a major disservice to the students who often graduate college fully indoctrinated with a set of beliefs that they have no idea how to defend or even a real idea of what the opposition is challenging. Debate ideas openly honestly and publicly and the best ideas should win public support. If you get what you want because you successfully prevented the other side from being heard, you have done the public a great disservice.
I did 22 years of service, fought in three wars, multiple advanced degrees, one in military history. I’ve had talks with officers, peers, who did not understand at all how bad morale can get, they got an earful about this. There’s a reason the US is so serious about paying military and veterans what they were promised in return for service, even if we don’t remember why. I get it, Iron Age. The stories of what soldiers do when they aren’t paid, have tours extended indefinitely, or run out of supplies are all the same. To put it in military speak - shit goes south fast. Amazes me how some of those soldiers went years without pay. It’s a lot of faith they put in their government. Often misplaced.
I was about to comment saying that Albinus had brought Veterans who had been stationed in Britain.. Before noticing It's a completely different Albinus and in a completely different Roman War lol
We have the same kind of things in the US military. Enlistees take an oath to uphold and defend the constitution but give up many rights and protections under that same constitution and commit to the Uniform code of military justice.
12:28 any explanations about that "VIIII" 9, anybody? Is it "IX" as I learnt it, a -1 and a 10? or is it this 5 + 4? Or both? it is confusing. thank you, anybody
Rome had two different ways of spelling 4 or 9. It could be IIII for 4 or VIIII for 9. That is an older version, that was however quite frequently used when refering to legions. However, it could be written as IV (for 4) or IX (for 9) as well. Same goes obviously for e.g. 14. XIV or XIIII. Caesar himself used both versions in his famous "bello gallico", where he used both ways when he referred to the 14th legion IIRC.
It also worth noting that Roman discipline are similiar yet diffrent than what we think discipline today, largely due to Roman virtue that highly reward bold, aggresive action and winning glory. Just look at Roman politics and Roman triumph. Discipline thus served to temper Roman cultivited hot headedness(which is why this is how Roman justfiy their loss most of the time) and judging by how unusually lenient Roman general forgive or at least limit their punishment were probably with considerstion of their own culture bias in mind.
Cant wait for people to somehow blame the barbarians for this one. Big L for Rome when their most loyal troops were foreign mercenaries like the foederati and varangians, whereas the born Romans seemed more interested in carving up the Empire
caesars tactic is quite useful. I use a similar approach in my classroom. When I have a student who it out of line I will tell them that Ngoc is a student they should copy as she never speaks out without raising her hand and studies hard to get good grades. Then later on if the student who was out of line starts doing better I will openly praise them in front of the class.
Just must be mentioned - the mutineers pardoned by Sulla and cajoled by Caesar become loyal personally to them, and served them in their own civil wars against Marius and Cinna, and Pompey. Could it be that they felt they were outlaws on parole, depending on the good graces of yheir general?
Did the character of mutinies change in the Empire? Tacitus recounts some in the early Empire, fuelled by late discharges and seeming opportune because of the recent ascension of Tiberius, but the only later ones I know of are attempted usurpers. Perhaps the fading of the Republican tradition among roman soldiers made them less capable of organising a mutiny in the same way as before.
Mutiny just means not obeying or rebelling against authorities. Doesn’t necessarily means it’s exclusive for ships or the navy. I think it was just widely associated with and used for naval crews during the age of discovery and that’s why most people would think of the navy or pirates
Individually ofc since very few situations are exactly the same. So i guess the point of this video is to show Romans could have mutinies and wernt perfect people? Wow, what a shocker i tell you.
Why do you not use the modern scholastic BCE and CE? There are plenty of valid historical reasons for doubting the existence of Jesus plus BC and AD are exclusive of other cultures. Reference The Jesus Myth by G.A. Wells and the Jesus Puzzle by Earl Doherty. Using BCE and CE is more inclusive and more accurate.
And especially when refering to legions XIIII or VIIII was used quite frequently. Caesar himself used both versions in his bello gallico. Once he wrote legio XIIII, but he wrote legio XIV as well. You should not make claims like you did when your knowledge about a topic is only very sketchy. Or phrase it as a question if you wonder if you assume that something is incorrect.
Start speaking a new language in 3 weeks with Babbel 🎉. Get up to 60% OFF your subscription ➡
Here: go.babbel.com/t?bsc=usa-influ-eg-dt-1m&btp=default&UA-cam&Influencer..Feb-2024..USA-TATAM..1200m60-yt-historiamilitum-feb-2024
Uh that statement you made about learning a bit of french before going to quebec or france wasn't the best thing to say. Completely different dialects. You don't want to learn canadian french and then use it in france. You'll get some weird looks at best and people will think you're a backwoods hillbilly at worst
Sacre Bleu. Actually people already have me down as a backwoods Hillbilly so not much to lose.
_ hellenes gamadion 20 sid _ pythagoras tetractys hexagram sexagram 20 _ rome 20 T _ english T 20th letter _ atlas _ atlast20 _ 048 even _ 1235679 odd _
Do a video on "Post Battle Conditions". What happened to all the dead, all the weapons, armor. The supply camps that followed the legions.
Good idea… will look into it.
Yes, that sounds like it would be a great episode.
Agreed excellent idea I have not seen covered yet!
Just watched the video made because of this suggestion. It's quite interesting :)|
Thanks for suggesting this.
@@HistoriaMilitum Thanks for doing the video! It was fascinating!
Caesar dealing with the munity of the 10th legion is my favourite at a different time than one in the video . After 13 years of continuous war and service legions VII, IX, X and XII wanted their deserved retirement/money/land, the awards promised by Caesar during his campaign in Gaul and battles against Pompey.
Caesar went personally into their camp and asked what they wanted. Legions doubled down on their demands which Caesar called their bluff, addressing them as Citizens instead of Legionnaires, saying they would all be released from service then went to leave.
This caused such a shock among the dishonoured legion who were hoping they were badly needed for a campaign in Africa, they instead starting begging Caesar to reconsider and take them on campaign which Caser refused, stating he was upset the soldiers didn't trust his promises after all the years they had been fighting together. Eventually Caesar agreed to accept them back apart from the tenth whom started begging for forgiveness and even agreed to the mentioned decimation.
When Caesar also forgave the tenth, he didn't put any rebel soldier to death but he found out the ring leaders and made sure in upcoming battles they were put in the most dangerous places
Not only did he avoid munity, he actively had made the rebels beg forgiveness and were more willing to fight for him than before.
Very Shrewd
Politically astute until it came to dealing with Senators....."et tu, Brute ?"
@nicolasrose3064 That's Shakespearean history......not actual history.
@@gomahklawm4446
Yeah well, you understand the inference though ... don't you, or does your obsessive compulsive pedantic historical reality checking pompous self-agrandising dismissiveness need congratulating...?
@@gomahklawm4446
Zoom out from your obsessive compulsive pedantic historical reality checking pompous self-agrandising dismissiveness and try and regard the comment as having a connotative meaning, seriously, the inference made has merit as a suggestive stimulus, it isn't meant as a literal historical connect, as in,
make out of it, whatever the f-ck you want, if you can only see it within set parameters, that's on you, whatever you think you need to attribute to it, that's on you, not me.
Caesar was such a chad, he talked down the mutineers, who felt so bad about it they said they'd kill themselves. Caesar said nah, just don't do it again.
Unironically, IMO Caesar was by far the greates person who ever lived.
He was a genius in every field - his laws where amazingly well crafted, he was a gifted orator, he was brave, he was a military genius, he was loved by his troops and the people, he was generous, he showed clemency, he worked very hard (not only in big areas, but in small stuff as well - maintaining the roads in earlier posts in his youth e.g.), He introduced a new calendar after several decades when nobody bothered to put the calendar right.
He was a visionair who clearly saw the future of Rome and what had to be done to protect it.
He was fair and generous not only to his peers but to the common soldiers and citizens in Rome as well. He protected them and their interests throughout all of his career, in all his laws he suggested. He never was interested in amassing wealth for himself, he never wanted power only because of the power. He wanted - and needed - power to make a change for the better, to lay a solid foundation for the future. Not for himself or some aristocracy, but for Rome itself and all its citizens.
AND HE SUCCEDED. He made Rome a better place, he laid the foundation for Pax Romana, a long peace where everybody prospered. After decades upon decades of unrest and civil war he laid the foundation for peace and prosperity. Yes, it did not last forever - but no human can create something that lasts for centuries and millenia.
We have other people who were great orators (Cicero), we have people who where great military leaders (Alexander).
But we do not know of another human being that combined all the skills and qualities Caesar had.
@@wedgeantilles8575 I totally agree. The man was gifted in every capacity. His life story reads like the most interesting fiction I have ever read, but it is all true.
@@wedgeantilles8575On another thread just had a mini argument about how Napoleon was NOT a genius, more like a reasonably competent person, then ambitious opportunist which exceded his competence.
He openly copied and emulated ceasar which itself is an admission to "I'm not as good as this guy but trying to"
If your not smart enough to know the limits of your ability your not a genius.
@@V.B.Squire Agreed. Napoleon is pretty overrated. He was also a liberal and wanted power only for the sake of power, which is pretty damn cringe.
@@blorb32 you ruined this intellectual comment section
*Furiously writes down notes for worldbuilding*
Correct. Roman discipline and obedience to orders could vary quite a bit. It's a false image that persists just like Samurai being loyal and European Knights being chivalrous. The reality is not necessarily like the image.
Reading Roman history always shocked me about this. You have it in your head they are somewhat like modern volunteer Western militaries, since they were one of the few state militaries (and mostly volunteer) in the ancient world, then you find out what happens when the pay is late, the food ran out, they didn't like a particular commander/Emperor, got spooked by a superstition, or just plain didn't want to fight.
How is that surprising with the amount of civil wars and coups in the late empire
It is no longer a false image
@@MM22966 "war, war never changes" in this human* aspect
How to stop a mutiny in one word by Julius Caesar
"Civilians.."
"My name is Maximus Decimus Meridius, commander of the Armies of the North, General of the Felix Legions and loyal servant to the true emperor, Marcus Aurelius...." 😳
"And I will have my vengeance..in this life..or the next."
...and all these after screwing the daughter of his father like figure of course lol
one of my fav movies of all time.
Ugh.. what has this tired shit got to do with the video?
@@lazy_nytare you not entertained!!!😂
At my signal, unleash hell
Excellent video, and very well presented. Thank you! Regards from Canada 🇨🇦
Like mentioned on this channel in a video before, during the civil war 83/82 BC Pompey Magnus was ordered to Africa to smash the remaining forces of Marius. His fleet landed near the ruins of Carthage where some legionaires found a buried treasure, which sparked a mutiny, with the majority of the soldiers abandoning their command and going treasure hunting themselves. Pompey, who understood that he would not be able to stop this, spent his time going around and mocking and laughing at the soldiers and their unsuccessful efforts. A few days later his troops returned remorsefully to him and begged to be taken in again, their hard labour in vain had been punishment enough, which Pompey generously accepted.
A veteran viewer 😉. Thanks for your loyalty and support through the years 😊
@@JonEtxebeberriaRodriguez Thank you for your friendly response!
Love your work man, been following you for a year now, come a long way!
I appreciate that!
After all, they were humans exactly like us. I heard once, from an ex military, those soldiers can have doubts regarding a strategy or command if it is unreasonable or too risky... He said "Of course soldiers can be afraid". I think this kind of nuances are important to know the history in detail and how it really was.
I'm a fairly new subscriber; your narration and uploads is very engaging 😊
Thank you, welcome aboard!
Excellent coverage of this particular subject. Thank you!
Love this channel
Ooooo, we hope that you start to make more videos
Hi! Just a quick correction, Scipio Africanus fell ill at Cartago Nova (Hispania) not Carthage (Africa) :)
Yes! I must have forgot to say “new carthage”.
Great video please more
Subscribed, even a cursory glance at Roman history reveals many mutinies in the Legions.
In the US military mutiny itself isn't the only crime, failing to suppress or at the least report a mutiny or desire for a mutiny is also covered by Article 94. The punishment is death or such other punishment as a court martial may direct
Now a days bad commanders just get smoked by their own soldiers, rather than a full blown mutiny.
Fragging.
I really want to study or delve deeper more into why ancient armies are more likely to go into mutiny than modern professional armies.
Imagine having your pay delayed for months at a time. Or perhaps years. British Sailors usually are not paid by the month but sometimes in years or at best in six months after serving at sea.
Imagine that plus shitty situations and shit food. Who wouldn't? I mean, Medieval knights had a tendency to disregard a monarchs decree and even rebel despite being given land to tax and farm. Just look at hubgarian empire and see how shitty and army of knights can be when you really need them.
Well it’s just my guess but one thing is that the modern armies should be getting paid on time whether they are from a democratic or dictatorial nation. Everyone knows that if you anger the military they can and will seize control or depose a ruler.
And for the case of the US military I can also think of how they do rotations when they were in Iraq or Afghanistan. These soldiers weren’t there for a full 20 years but served in tours of a few years at a time. I would imagine if someone were made to serve in a foreign land for 20 years would be quite dissatisfied.
Cell phones and pizza delivery
It happened a lot in Vietnam actually. Fragging it was called though to hide the truth. There was another word used, but I can't think of it.
very interesting
5:39 talk about putting yourself in a weird position as a commander. He purposefully took in a legion with a history of mutiny & didn’t break them up (unless he did & it just wasn’t mentioned)
Ah, the classic 10th Equestris
The sword of Damocles saw no rest for the wicked in Rome.
4 years without pay and poor conditions? Those guys are more loyal that i am.
Thank you very much. I wish you had been around when I took Roman history in college in the early 80s. You've added a lot to my knowledge through watching your videos, Reading books such as Gladius, , and listening to selective podcasts. ,
I just have to say thank you very much
Caesars speech = Divide et Impera
your approach to topics is so fresh and needed!
Great job, dude! I've been following your work for a year and you've really made it.
I thought your going to make a vid of Part 3 of Dacian wars
That should be out in 1-2 months. We have 2-3 videos planned before it.
I could easily watch a 2 hour video of you covering various mutinies, especially (but not only) if tied to especially notable people.
Hmmm…..this might be a good time to act on historical precedent……😉
ok this is new to me. 9th is written as VIIII but not IX. Interesting to say the least.
The exclusive use of IX for 9 was formalized much much later. The Romans used IIII or IV and VIIII or IX pretty much indistinctively. For example the gates of the Colosseum are numbered in this format LXVIIII
76 mutinies in sixty years is not that bad actually if you compare it with early modern European armies. The Spanish Army of Flanders had much more in half that time from the 1570s to 1609. I guess the Romans were probably better at paying their troops than the Habsburgs.
“Measured military punishment, together with a short and clear explanation of the offense, touches the ambitious soldier more than brutality which drives him to despair.” - Generalissimo Alexander Suvorov
Give a man hope and he'll lead the charge into Hell...and TAKE IT!
Very nice video.I read that in many cases of mutiny,centurions and other officers that were hated by the men,were executed.What happened with the soldiers that executed their centurions?Was a general rule of how to deal with those men or it was a case by case scenario,with the general deciding what punishment he should order?
interesting video
In Old Latin this was known as Youno PayMeacus I Mutinyus..yes...I made that up but it sounds good right?
Very good, very illuminating. Thank you.
Great Video!!! Can you do one about Legio XXI Rapax?
Excellent. Thank you.
Thank you very much for this valuable information and nice videos
What the Romans had , that we lack today , is a sense of Honor ! Honor for Rome , their Legion , their fellow Legionnaires and lastly themselves . Very rare today !
is there any occasion where the mutiny legion just defected (or threatened to defect) to the other side, especially during civil war? Like the 9th just like "screw Ceasar, we will join Pompey"?
also, what would be the centurion's role during the mutiny? Did they often side with the general, or they were the ringleader themselves?
I mean in Spain Pompey’s legion did defect nominally to Caesar since they didn’t really want to fight. I would say nominally since Pompey was in Greece at the time separated from his legions in Spain so Caesar probably just kept these guys in Spain to garrison it.
There’s also the case when Octavian and Anthony had their civil wars. In the battle of actium quite a lot of Anthony’s men defected but I’m not too sure if it was whole legions or enough soldiers defected that the legions were basically defunct.
One of the things I admire about the Romans is the dedication to freedom of speech / complaints you were expected to be able to defend your position with logic rather than attempting to silence your critics. It may not be very comfortable to be shouted down by your critics when you walk into the stadium but it's necessary for a healthy civilization to address problems and concerns of the people as they arise rather than sweeping them under the rug to fester into a much larger problem. I think the lack of debate and rhetoric in the modern mainstream curriculum is a major disservice to the students who often graduate college fully indoctrinated with a set of beliefs that they have no idea how to defend or even a real idea of what the opposition is challenging. Debate ideas openly honestly and publicly and the best ideas should win public support. If you get what you want because you successfully prevented the other side from being heard, you have done the public a great disservice.
Sadly, the USA is turning against that very thing and it's ruining us.
Very, very informative 😊😊😊😊😊😊
I did 22 years of service, fought in three wars, multiple advanced degrees, one in military history.
I’ve had talks with officers, peers, who did not understand at all how bad morale can get, they got an earful about this.
There’s a reason the US is so serious about paying military and veterans what they were promised in return for service, even if we don’t remember why.
I get it, Iron Age. The stories of what soldiers do when they aren’t paid, have tours extended indefinitely, or run out of supplies are all the same.
To put it in military speak - shit goes south fast. Amazes me how some of those soldiers went years without pay. It’s a lot of faith they put in their government. Often misplaced.
I love your content
I was about to comment saying that Albinus had brought Veterans who had been stationed in Britain.. Before noticing It's a completely different Albinus and in a completely different Roman War lol
Would consider making similar videos for the Parthians and or the Sassanid?
Very interesting
I think Army was a good job back then. Regular pay. Healthcare. If U are not constantly in battle doesnt sounds bad back then
Albinus decided to hold a speech to rally his men, but ends up getting stoned to death 😂 what we in 2024 would refere to, as an "Epic fail"
Where djd you get thay Banner? That is so good!!@ did you get it from devian art?
Lol why you finna purchase one?
We have the same kind of things in the US military. Enlistees take an oath to uphold and defend the constitution but give up many rights and protections under that same constitution and commit to the Uniform code of military justice.
I wonder many civil wars were fought among Romans before the end of the Roman Empire in the West?
There were a lot of civil wars spanning centuries of Rome’s existence. It was a big factor that led to its demise.
"i don't know now Varro, do you think this spot is good for a fair battle?"
Infantry soldier
12:28 any explanations about that "VIIII" 9, anybody? Is it "IX" as I learnt it, a -1 and a 10?
or is it this 5 + 4? Or both?
it is confusing.
thank you, anybody
Rome had two different ways of spelling 4 or 9.
It could be IIII for 4 or VIIII for 9. That is an older version, that was however quite frequently used when refering to legions.
However, it could be written as IV (for 4) or IX (for 9) as well.
Same goes obviously for e.g. 14. XIV or XIIII.
Caesar himself used both versions in his famous "bello gallico", where he used both ways when he referred to the 14th legion IIRC.
@@wedgeantilles8575 I am glad to read that the Romans were confused, too. Thank you.
I asked the same question. Glad to see it answered here. Thank you.
It also worth noting that Roman discipline are similiar yet diffrent than what we think discipline today, largely due to Roman virtue that highly reward bold, aggresive action and winning glory. Just look at Roman politics and Roman triumph.
Discipline thus served to temper Roman cultivited hot headedness(which is why this is how Roman justfiy their loss most of the time) and judging by how unusually lenient Roman general forgive or at least limit their punishment were probably with considerstion of their own culture bias in mind.
Even Then , Military and Politics were bedfellows
3rd century rebellions would be interesting
this makes it so much more clear why Roman elected politicians as generals.
Cant wait for people to somehow blame the barbarians for this one. Big L for Rome when their most loyal troops were foreign mercenaries like the foederati and varangians, whereas the born Romans seemed more interested in carving up the Empire
Typo at 10:14 - “35” ringleaders, not “350”.
This is the humanity I know
caesars tactic is quite useful. I use a similar approach in my classroom. When I have a student who it out of line I will tell them that Ngoc is a student they should copy as she never speaks out without raising her hand and studies hard to get good grades. Then later on if the student who was out of line starts doing better I will openly praise them in front of the class.
Just must be mentioned - the mutineers pardoned by Sulla and cajoled by Caesar become loyal personally to them, and served them in their own civil wars against Marius and Cinna, and Pompey.
Could it be that they felt they were outlaws on parole, depending on the good graces of yheir general?
Much respect to the 9th legion and the 10th legion ok there was a mutiny those men dishonored themselves.
I'm curious, do you ever refernce the music you are using? SHouldn't you ask permission to use the Rome Total War 2 soundtrack for example?
is it just me, or did Roman citizens and soldiers do better at keeping authority in check than what we do nowadays?
Decimation. Enough said.
12:28 Why "LEG VIIII" and not "LEG IX"??
Decimation? 😎
oooh so that's where the world "decimate" comes from.... very interesting
Ceasar didn’t threaten to march with the tenth legion. He went with the 13th!
Did the character of mutinies change in the Empire? Tacitus recounts some in the early Empire, fuelled by late discharges and seeming opportune because of the recent ascension of Tiberius, but the only later ones I know of are attempted usurpers. Perhaps the fading of the Republican tradition among roman soldiers made them less capable of organising a mutiny in the same way as before.
"How Rome dealt with mutinies in the army"?
Very smartly it seems.
Are you not entertained
Is this Rome II or TOtal War Attila with mods?
Mutiny involves a ship or vessel. This video concerns sedition.
Mutiny just means not obeying or rebelling against authorities. Doesn’t necessarily means it’s exclusive for ships or the navy. I think it was just widely associated with and used for naval crews during the age of discovery and that’s why most people would think of the navy or pirates
Roman kids: Scibio Gyat scibio toilet. You are so scibio
Yeah, I heard your name. There's nothing shorter I can refer to you as?
Individually ofc since very few situations are exactly the same. So i guess the point of this video is to show Romans could have mutinies and wernt perfect people? Wow, what a shocker i tell you.
Scipio's men were undersupplied and unpaid for _four years?_
Why do you not use the modern scholastic BCE and CE? There are plenty of valid historical reasons for doubting the existence of Jesus plus BC and AD are exclusive of other cultures. Reference The Jesus Myth by G.A. Wells and the Jesus Puzzle by Earl Doherty. Using BCE and CE is more inclusive and more accurate.
Quasi entertainment quasi accurate and mostly boring information from some whote who forces you to watch a commercial
9 is IX not VIIII
Both are used interchangeably by the Romans
And especially when refering to legions XIIII or VIIII was used quite frequently.
Caesar himself used both versions in his bello gallico. Once he wrote legio XIIII, but he wrote legio XIV as well.
You should not make claims like you did when your knowledge about a topic is only very sketchy.
Or phrase it as a question if you wonder if you assume that something is incorrect.
Ah yes, Quebec, the finest of foreign vacations, eh?
Who. Taught. You. To. Speak?!?!
My god it's like your tongue has mutinied .
Un 9th would be IX not VIIII never . Its I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XIi etc
Why. O. Why. What. For go home. And. Choos. Life
THE BABBEL ADVERT, AND IT'S MUSIC COULD NOT BE
SKIPPED OR TURNED. OFF. IT WAS SHIT ANNOYING, AND TOO LONG. I HAD TO DELETE THIS. VIDEO.
"This channel doesn't have any content"
Always the same kind of twatwaffle.
Is this narrated by AI? The pronunciation of certain term like "committee" is distracting.
What type of potato computer are you playing Rome total war on
🗿👍
Quebecois is definitely not Francais.
"i don't know now Varro, do you think this spot is good for a fair battle?"
Infantry soldier
"i don't know now Varro, do you think this spot is good for a fair battle?"
Infantry soldier