It was the artists who depicted the AI as victims of robot racism and the workers who hated them as bigots. Either that or the AI is a genocide machine
I think that AAA companies will avoid AI for fully developing games (at least for now), but I do truly believe that those cheap mobile games are going to be flooded with AI content, they already were generating ads like crazy and this looks like the next step for those developers lol
Feels almost vindictive how intensely AI developers targeting/trying to replace basically every creative industry. Like a, "You artists thought you were safe, but you're actually first to go!" from the people behind it. It's also possible we just didn't notice it happening in less prominent industries, but it's rough regardless.
AI is also kinda a depressing topic, lol, I get why you'd like to leave the content behind. It's not boring, but it sure leaves a bad taste in your mouth.
This is the thing, Ai developers aren't targeting anyone. The goal is just creating AGI and AI that is more power than the previous iteration. The government's goal is for AI to be stronger than other countries' AI for military and economic power advantages. China is pouring billions into AI research every year now and they are getting close to AI of similar power to the models we have in the US. I can assure you the Chinese government does not care about using AI to make video game devs unemployed. It just so happens to be that creative works and art are the ones that are easier to replace than other, more manual and dexterous tasks. It's unintuitive because people mindlessly believed Art is someone that cannot be replicated and there's some "human"/ "soul" element in how we generate something but the truth is consumers buy something if they think it's worth the money, not if a product was made with AI or in today's case, child labor from Taiwan. It's not like AI researchers wake up and go like "how can I fuck with artists some more", Art, writing, creative tasks is just easier for AI to do at scale more so than pure logic and math skills at the moment. The goal is for AI to be good at those too of course it's just too much computation power and there's limitations of the current architecture to allow that and then computer science, data analytics, math and statistics jobs will slowly start to get replaced too (if it ever gets that good which I doubt we will see anytime soon).
@@NadestraightNot immediately. In the short term we’ll probably see a lot of ai slop flood the indie developer space, making even harder to succeed there as if it wasn’t already.
@@quaesitumspatium7751 I feel like the only way actual game developers will be able to make success games now is by showing themselves making their games to show that they aren’t AI generated to encourage people to play them once the actual lack of originality that exists in AI becomes obvious; AI can’t create, only replicate, so if indie developers start milking AI, people will become increasingly better at identifying an AI generated game based on the parallels that exist in other AI generated games, and at the same time, actual developers will start AI poisoning assets in their games, all of which will make it increasingly difficult for people to make games via AI as they’ll become too similar to other AI generated games and the games that were used for those AI generators.
@@Nadestraight i think what they mean is that AAA games will get worse. they already feel samey, and ai gets really good at doing one specific thing, the games that define a year or a decade are always unique, and break the formula because at their heart, games are art, and art isnt compelling if a person doesn't make it. its the same reason everyone hates AI art
to be fair most of them already are, there are a lot of pre-release rug pulls. imagine when you buy and AI generated game and the devs don't exist or have no idea how to code to fix the issues.
@@Nadestraight I feel like actual game developers will begin to have to more frequently stream the development of their games to show that they aren’t AI generated and AI poisoning will become increasingly popular.
Are they not already? If anything, "humans" getting the boot would greatly benefit the art. Those brainless, unevolved creatures keep uglifying everything, releasing buggy messes, and mutating everything into pay-to-win trash. Not to mention how creatively bankrupt they are when it comes to story. None of those "people" are worthy of sympathy, let alone support.
I am a software developer. If all we did was write code, I'd say be worried. But by the time you're no longer a junior, writing code is a small part of what you actually do. It will make getting an entry level job much harder, and it's already one of the hardest to land, so that does suck. But it's always been the case, once you have some experience, you're golden.
Again, its hard not to be pessimistic about the future of creative industries in general when tools like this keep coming out. Not only is it yet another AI tool that's going to be used to undermine workers' salaries and rights in creative industries and be a threat to their livelihoods, but it would also inevitably be used to churn out a bunch of slop content that makes even current AAA slop games like soulful by comparison.
It is a fault of games selling platforms if they can't manage publishing. That issue can be solved in many different ways, there is no way that making things harder to make is the best solution. Every time when barrier of entry got lower it was good for games.
@@KraszuPolis This isn't just about lowering the barrier of entry like say, making Unity and Unreal free to use for beginners did. This is the type of automation can and will kill wages and jobs, especially for anyone looking for an entry level job that one can build into a higher-paying career. We should support indie and beginner developers, but supporting tools that corporations are already using to justify laying off tens of thousands of workers isn't good for anyone in the long term, including the smaller and solo developers.
The issue with the idea that AI will replace game developers, even in the next couple decades, is that it doesn't track with how AI is created and improved. Even studios with hundreds of games will not have enough training data to create an AI that can make something that rivals what a human developer could put out, especially when we talking about innovation, something that AI can't really do. Plus, AI will plateau very soon. It already takes billions of dollars to train models that only rival human beings in very narrow areas and make mistakes often. Not to mention the energy consumption for training something like GPT-3 was the equivalent of running a nuclear power plant for a year. So there's a lack of training data, and a lack of funding. I'm not worried in the least that AI video games will take of, just like I wasn't worried that Bitcoin would replace the dollar, or that NFTs were the next real estate boom.
You’re right, our technological level is not good enough to make such things however when fusion power and quantum computing comes it will be a different story
It will replace most of the work, but you will still need humans to manage it, give ideas, and polish ideas. You will need much less humans to make a game, but that could lead to games becoming much more specialized, it will be worth to make AAA games that appeal to niche markets. It will be worth to make AAA games with risky ideas, they will not have to appeal to "everybody" anymore.
"look at how X turned out" look at how the latest stable diffusion version turned out and how PISSED the lazybones are now that their prompts are making eldritch horrors
@@Brain4BrainYou won't get as good doing it in your free time next to full time boring job trying to pay your bills. That's why many give up on their dreams
AI generated music made me realize just how mid AI actually is, it will never have the soul So I started learning how to draw and even help some new indie game developers so we can have more projects with actual passion behind them
I hate to say this but I don't agree with this one, AI generated music is actually one of the more convincing things I've found. It definitely took some time, initially the music was terrible, but after learning what prompts to give the AI, learning that writing your own lyrics provides better results, etc, I've created some very convincing AI music, that has fooled some people, and admittedly that I now listen to myself. I actually played 5 AI tracks in a livestream, and nobody batted an eye.
@@Nadestraight Yeah but as a "musician" (not pro one but still). AI music still lacks something compared to human generated one. The feelings behind the musician who made it, the reason, everything can be felt by their music. Alright I'm just jealous that AI can make a song in 10 seconds while it takes me a few hours XDD
Sure, an AI model can generate a simple top down game. However the step between that and actually generating a fun gaming experiences is huge. For it to output anything resembling something as complex as an enjoyable gaming experience, is something we most likely are decades away from. Remember, the machine doesn't understand what fun is, and for it to be able to create something unique that is enjoyable, it would need to understand what actually makes a game enjoyable. This is a question that is insanely difficult to answer as a game contains so many moving parts making it the piece of art that it is. The training that would be require is immense and that would most likely only allow it to create relatively simple games that doesn't stray to far in a specific genre. Really interesting topic, but I believe this video sends the wrong message. Right now the gaming industry is flourishing, more jobs exist that ever before. Remember, the news headlines only focus on the bad news, they don't talk about all the indie studios blowing up or the 20000 jobs expected to be needed in the industry *in Sweden alone*. The point is if you are thinking about getting into the industry but you are afraid of AI taking your job. Don't be, AI will probably be an important part in the industry. Tools will be created which changes our workflow but even at the rate AI is progressing today, it got enormous challenges ahead before ever getting close to the doomsday scenario described in this video.
You're right with some of what you say, but you're also being incredibly naive I think. AI progresses at an incredible rate, saying we are multiple decades away from enjoyable and believable AI made games is a huge lapse in judgement of the situation. I think we're 5 years away from this producing something which some people will say is enjoyable. And yes, it'll be 2D games at first, stuff inspired by Mario/Sonic/Pokemon/Zelda/Megaman/Pacman etc. etc. etc. But that's the beginning. The beginning is not far at all, 5 years will fly by in the blink of an eye.
@@Nadestraight TLDR: AI faces more obstacles than just making an enjoyable game and AI making us more efficient or even making stuff that humans touch up might make jobs disappear at first but will create jobs in the long run as companies will have to scale up their games to stay competitive, larger scale means AI makes more mistakes for people to correct so more people will need to be employed to fix those mistakes. AI is causing multiple industry disruptions but I really don't think it'll erase any industry. I do agree with you to an extent but I think you're a bit too on the gloomy end of things which I kinda understand because of what happened. AI might be able to create fully fledged games like that in 5 years, I think this will only make AI games the new measuring bar. You're assuming that what is enjoyable and believable will stay consistent from now until 5 years from now, you're also assuming that AI will just keep getting better and better exponentially and won't hit a ceiling. (For example self driving cars have hit a ceiling even though they were expected to take over the job of every single taxi, truck and delivery driver years ago. They say they are 99.9% there and yet getting that last 0.01% there is proving very very difficult for them due to driving situations that happen extremely rarely and also legal liability.) Once AI hits that point and everyone will be able to make games of a certain quality then that will become the new bar of quality to beat if you're hoping to sell your game. The whole "If everyone's super then nobody is" kinda deal. If everyone can make and release a 2D game inspired by Mario/Sonic/Pokemon/Zelda/Megaman/Pacman etc. which is already an extremely saturated space then every game in that space will need to stand out more (be bigger and better) to turn a profit. I don't see the industry just being one programmer, one artist, one sound guy, one designer and one manager per company and everything else is done by AI since AI will allow us to make bigger and better games and this will mean AI will make more mistakes that people have to correct hence more jobs for people with skills that fix those mistakes. Game projects that are impossible to produce now even to AAA companies due to budget or resources will become possible with AI and I don't think it's far fetched it'll become a matter of time or even a race between these companies to be the first to market with these new megaprojects to capture a whole new audience. If this doesn't happen then we might even see new AAA companies arise because they were the ones that shipped these megaprojects first and beat the current gaming giants. I do agree it's the beginning but I feel like you think it's the beginning of 90% of developers in the game industry losing their jobs and not the beginning of a large amount of innovation of leveraging what AI can do to propel us higher. (Now this may be actually naive of me but I'm hoping AI will give AAA studios a kick in the ass to make something new once anyone in their garage can produce what they can) Lastly there are many problems even outside of producing the game itself that face AI that will have to be solved, mainly the fact there's precedent that AI art can't be copyrighted. I'm unsure how this would work out with video games but I doubt studios would want their own IPs to be yoinked by anyone and everyone because their games are now produced by AI. This is just one example, more obstacles to rolling out AI made games could arise. Like the commenter above I do also believe this video sends the wrong message, but not because AI won't be able to produce enjoyable games in X timeframe but because you're not considering the consequences of that being case besides: "I guess everyone except the 3 best people in their field in the company loses their jobs now and all companies will pump out the same games and everyone will just buy it exactly like before and the market won't become ridiculously oversaturated and the AAA companies will make a trillion dollars in profit firing everyone, making themselves unable to scale up."
Making video games is extremely complicated. There's a lot of moving parts that has to work together. Plus you are also dealing with human psychology and game design, which is quite abstract and therefore hard for AI to understand. I don't think AI alone will ever be able to make a video game thats remotely good. It will only be able to create smal and basic games or unplayable garbage. AI will be able to speed up workflows and people will loose their jobs, but good games can only be made when humans are involved in the process.
I think that is why tuber mentioned those few people that are left there. They still need some coders to clean up bugs and refine the mistakes AI does. They still need someone with artistic view to make sure the art says coherent & consistent (so that one character isn't weird lowpoly pixelation and another is hyperrealistic highly detailed one). And they still need designer or few that came up with some idea (or at least to refine the idea and make sure whole game reflects it). Yes AI can't make a game we would love but i can totally see how in future it may be possible for 3 to 60 people do games that currently take hundreds of employees. This might lead into either "AAA" games becoming very generic and boring... or maybe the fact that they have money and resources might lead into them starting finally competing against each other again and they might try to make games that are so massive that no AI can keep up with the scope. And because of so many layoffs there will be many MANY more indie studios that both will use AI and won't - that will keep making unique game experiences that stand out. If indie studio capable to making risks has about same amount of staff in their studio as some "AAA" studio has - if they essentially start to compete with same terms then i feel like that will force the "AAA" to use their resources smarter. (This all might be copium - i might totally be wrong with these guesses - maybe most AAA studios go bankrcupt instead if they start chasing unicorns that cost 0 dollars but in their eyes profit millions... maybe they start making same mistakes as some companies did with VR technology few years ago... maybe its crypto/NFT hype& crash loop again? We don't know - we will see soon what actually will happen with this new tech).
Ai can make good games if you are creative in writing. The only problem for now is quality which will get better and AAA trying to force political agendas on everyone which means you can still make games without it but it will take longer. People are lazy so most people will use it and try to pass themselves off as a game dev. I think society going to regret it because people will become dumber for not using their brains. I just flate out refuse to do that to myself. AI tools could be used to help people get their work done. This is what happens when everybody just learns to code but ignores the ethics behind what they are making.
I am just questioning every job, will this job be taken over by AI in the distant future? I am 17 and I am still picking my job. I want to be a chef, surely that job should we safe for some years. Right? 😅 AI is so scary because it is new and unpredictable. I watched the whole video. I hope you will be able to find a job!
Aw man, I've always wanted learn how to code and make a game and all that, but with all this AI stuff, I just feel it's a bit pointless to try learning how to use something like godot. I feel like if I were maybe 10 years younger or older, this would be a bit easier, since the technology would have time to progress to it's limit if I were younger, or I'd already had the chance to get a job if I were older, but I've just gotten out of high-school, and I have no clue which college courses are gonna be useless once I'm an adult. AI is genuinely scary for me, since I can't really predict what AI will learn to copy, and it's looking more and more like I won't be able to profit off of creativity, which is a damn shame.
At this point, just try. You will end up broke no matter what you choose in the end, you can't compete with robots no matter in what industry you gonna work in.
100% not actually making games. It's making videos. Why would a game have a.i. artifacts and morph into other characters? It wouldn’t. Because this is some fake tech company trying to get money and run
I noticed that too, the morph/Janus effect should not appear at all if this is recorded gameplay. The renderer appears to be creating only AI videos based on prompts.
@@vranigavrani if it's running in Godot, why doesn't it look like a normal game in Godot? Why did it not create static assets that you can move around in? Why does the character clip in front of objects and then behind them? These aren't how game engines work, but it is how a.i. videos work
@@StephenHarperRaptagon Hey IDK but based on what its said and if its true than it does generate godot 3.5+ project that you need to import in godot and edit, debug and export on your own. I can not find it to test on my own, author of this video did not leave his source, so i have as much info as you do, based on what he present in this video.
Honestly if you do keep up with ai and gaming videos, it'd be fun to see like a more depth or research put in. It'd really boost the gaming vid quality
Based on what you have showed us, I think it is more likely a game customization engine. It's probably not ripping code since it is using Godot (and probably gdscript) which came out way after some of the games mentioned. Secondly, the limited number of game types implies that there is baseline code that it is modifying So, I expect this is far from an AI generated from scratch game.
Seeing AI like this makes me wanna vomit. Pure rot in digital form spreads like a plague, taking the very things that makes us human one by one. Humanity would soon be full of walking shells incapable of creativity, passion and complex thought. This is where ai is guiding us.
Vote with your wallets folks. Sure you can eat at Mcdonald's (see above)...or you can do a little bit of homework and reward developers who actually hand craft amazing experiences. It's also completely f'd that AI is stealing all the work of others and passing it off as it's own and no one can do anything about it. Just gross.
People hate AI art. AI video games will be no different. People are already pissed that games are so cookie cutter. Do you really think people will enjoy reskinned variations of the same games a human actually made? The job is the same as it's always been. Make a game that's original and innovative enough to stand out. Don't let linear algebra steal your dreams lmao
Why can't you be a game developer? What does AI have to do you you being an indie game developer? I'm working on a game on Godot and I'm also studying algorithms and AI in college. If you are passionate about making games then this affects nothing
@@AbadonBIack You falsely assume that a project made with A.I cant compete with one made completely with out it. Also majority of gamers have been playing franchises that haven't changed in 5 plus years. Not enough people care for originality
I guess it would take some time to train an AI to understand what makes a game fun to play. How to come up with fresh and unexpected game mechanics. How to balance the game to be playable as p2p between different player types. Even if you train an AI to generate concept art, what happens after the first draft? Would you like to 'discuss' your ideas and change requests with an AI?
@@Nadestraight i still have hope, if we all get fooled i might be cooked. I want to go into the music field for my end career but it this keeps going i might just end up rotting away slowly 🤣
@@WorldWarWess-pb8iq This already exists basically, Hatsune Miku has millions of fans and sells out Arenas, and they just load up an mp4 file on a big screen
I am studying first year to become information and communications technology engineer and I am specializing in game development but right now I am really thinking if I should stop and study something like community pedagogy or social work instead :)
Looks extremely limited to me. Smells more like a cash grab from the developer to try to trick an investor into making him rich. The fact that it can only create Godot games in specific genres tells me it’s not doing much in the way of game code. It’s probably just created assets for an already existing game template. That’s nothing to worry about if you’re a dev.
I don't think players will comply with bad developed games that has no creativity and bring nothing new in gameplay, art design, or challenge. If the industry get the AI, but keep not creative and bad payed employee, they will certaintly lose for those that also use AI but keep the greatest geniuses, master and creative artists, designer and programmers. History has make books easier to write, but the ones that sell a lot are the good ones, not the random copies that always circle around.
Creating small puzzle games with Claude 3.5 Sonnet is fun, yet requires knowledge how coding works to get anything semi-usable. I can imagine anything creating a 3D game with a single prompt is closer to a downloaded template, which requires thousands of hours of additional work to get anything more than janky prototype. If that Render can’t reiterate the “project” with you after initial generated version, then it’s kinda useless.. imho
I'd say you do learn creativity. For example, graphic design, I learnt through tutorials and documentation, to play an instrument you read sheet music and have someone teach you how to tune a guitar for example, to create 3D models you go to college/ uni and watch youtube videos or in-app tutorials in blender, to learn pottery you'd go to a pottery class and copy the teacher, etc. etc. etc.
If AI can mimic something like coding then non-art related jobs are also on the line. Engineers, Lawyers, hell maybe even Doctors will start to be threatened as well. We need legal action on this technology asap. In the pursuit of automation tech-nerds have stepped on a landmine that will send ripples through the very foundations of our current societal structure. Automation of this scale is almost anathema to our capitalist society because workers also play the role of consumers. If the plan is to remove the workforce with machines who are you going to sell anything to? The workers you laid off will have no money to consume your goods anymore. Even if it's just the 1% left is it just going to be a bunch of rich dudes in a mountain trading with legions of automatons? The only type of society where this "we need to automate EVERYTHING" mentality fits is one that doesn't value goods and services. This is going to be the economic equivalent of the nuclear bomb in the long run.
Its crappy now, but considering that probably a lot of other people are making their version as well and open source is very promising. Perhaps this is what the gaming industry exactly needs. Nothing stops either Sony or Microsoft and even Nintendo from doing this either..
Big gaming companies will not be able to compete with independent developers if anybody will be able to make AAA games. I still think there will be a long time when human insight, ideas, and humans adding details/fixing odd things that AI will make will be important.
well, I hope AI doesn't take my dream job. I wanted to work with Cybersecurity, but, who knows? Brazil normally gets pretty late in these things I watched your heart condition video. Well, at least you're doing better nowadays
Lay almost everyone off = most people can make their own games, and they'll be competing directly with millions of others. Your idea makes no sense, unless we prevent people from using these tools. The bar for creativity hasn't been lowered much, but the bar for crafting has. Be ahead of the curve, not behind.
Maybe, it will be opportunity for those laid off talented people, who now will be able to independently create a game. And good game. Not like these big publishers, who will continue to produce garbage. I very much doubt, that AI will be able itself create something really good. It still will need a lot of human work.
@@Nadestraight It was a quote from a really old video before I got out of the alt-right where I was using Talk to Transformer to devise the "design document" of a videogame as a sort of Sam Hyde-esque comedy sketch. I was clearly in my pre-coming-out-as-trans phase there too.
Why do you think Marketing and Social employees are safe? I've seen a lot of AI activity in those spaces, too. The only people who are truly safe are the ones with the money. So everyone else will be at their mercy (or lack thereof).
What is this ai tool? Can you send me a link to it? Looking up "Render" or "Render ai video game" I can't find anything since it's such a commonly used word.
Na, the miserble gits at tech bro land are coming for that too, they are already trying to make robots with more manual dexterity. They want to ruin everyones fun. Soon they will have to A.I generate their customer base too. Stupid b**stards!
In theory this will be able to make incredible games, you see, most ai gpts know all the code of linux for example. If you know all the code you can utilze it very quickly, it will essentially transform ideas into games without all that effort on the part of the developer. The question is, what will the limitations be, if you have every made ai music you know what i mean about limitations being a huge problem
is there a link to this ai you talking about, if i search ai render game is dont find it. calling a ai something like "render" is useless since tha it a common word in itself. hard to search for then.
This is why nintendo and all of you game developers need to hurry up the retro original games or its gone and dissappear for ever by AI with "TEETHS AND A GIANT OCTOPUS", you done it people, you just had to let it happen, Now the AI tree effect begins to grow MORE spreads, How obvious are we doing this?
Bro, i didn't even started 😍 ain't no way future me gonna need to compete with AI generated games, by unknown authors with no game dev history. Will be anything fun left, that pays allat money? I wished to liv in LA in the future 🙄now everybody will dead broke, nd' only way to get huge bags of money is just by scamming others. Even with UBI, you would never afford to liv even better, nd' you will be stuck in one place, always. You won't have job, no career, nothin' to strive for, society will become even more alienated nd' wealthy nepo babies will get richer, if the AI won't be regulated and platforms won't fighting against it, cuz AI economically won't benefit no-one on the internet, in the long run. AI will completly make internet unusable, and soon you won't even know if ur online friends aren't AI too.
Data collection and loss of privacy/ constant surveillance is a major concern with AI. Games generated with AI could start recording your play-data, grabbing your data such as name/email/phone/address and sharing that data to other companies etc. There's also the concern of consumer bias, AI can preduct what to present to you based on your history, meaning your potential to discover something new could be lowered. You might start getting recommended the same kind of games, or maybe a game leads you down a specific path based on data, rather than letting you roam around. Etc.
If you do no care about what you support it may come back and bite you. If you are not concerned about what happens to other people then why should anyone be concerned about what happens to you? People do not care because it does not affect them until either the same thing happens to them or it affects them indirectly. If you keep giving money to unscrupulous companies do not be shocked if they start trying to influence with governments in ways that are not good for you. This is aleady becoming a problem.
@@Nadestraight China and the Three letter glowies already spy on me. There's feds listening through every microphone in my house. They know where I live they know every damn move I make they will come for me. AI is just another means to see what I do. Who am I to care if a fed that's watching me gets replaced with an AI? Same outcome.
@@Nadestraight The 3 Letter agencies are already spying on me. China is already spying on me, what does it matter if my personal fed that monitors me gets replaced with ai?
We'll see how this ends up. Have you seen the crypto bubble meme where the whole team; CEO, CTO and CFO, are the same person with different names and hair? In any case; the only authentic AI project I could find listed, was insightAI. Its limited at best. Its a form of "Find me shit in Pubmed publications". Useful. For sure. But that is not making games on a prompt like it is presented here. They are miles appart. It doesn't add up. AI spits out best solutions from thousands of failed attempts. And they are therefor often partially wrong. Games cannot be wrong. They have to be exact. Else they do not work. Hell, GPT spits out shit code on a frequent basis. What they show here, is unlikely real. My guess is its all presentation fluff and no, to barely, substance. Don't doom and gloom too much. Its bad for your health. Bubbles happen.
"The barrier for creativity" has definitely been lowered. I think you're a little too close to the subject and that's affecting your interpretation of this statement. It's not the same as saying that anyone can be as creative as a skilled experienced creative professional at the touch of a button, which seems to be how you interpreted it. This is a complex and nuanced topic, that I cannot suitably express in a simple UA-cam comment, so I expect many will read things into my statement which was not intended. All I am saying, is that statement alone is true, and does not necessarily mean what you think it means. I am not saying anything about this being good or bad, or diminishing the damage this is doing to real people.
You dint even mention the paper released by google called 'Genie' (Generative Interactive Env) Also your explanation as to how AI makes these games is very wrong. It doesnt dig up some old game code.
That wasn't my explanation, I never claimed to know how it works. That was a speculation/ possibility. I also haven't ever heard of this Genie thing you mentioned, I'll have to look into it some time
Not sure, Leonardo AI was basically the same thing when it started, just a sign-up page. We'll see how this unfolds. If nobody gets access within the next few weeks then maybe it's time to do another video about how this was a scam.
AI ultimately did not make the game. It was still prompted by a human. This will be a tool. If we get to a level where AI can prompt other AI with creative thought, we'll have other things to worry about.
AI development trends are, in the majority, decided by India and China. You do still have a chance to make something unique on the market when you take a look at what's illegal to do in India and China and what's culturally appropriate to their eyes. Try to implement the opposites at the core of your creation. Do not become a sell-out to them.
Easier said than done haha, I've applied for 30 graphic design positions last month and only heard back from 2 or 3. I remade my resume and portfolio too with updated/ better work and more recent career history. Rough times right now.
Bro tbh your doing too much theorycrafting and speculation. AI sucks at making stuff , it lacks spirit. You are acting like AI just linearly goes up exponentially at getting better, that not how it works bro. And sure AI can provide code, but if you don't know how to fix the bugs, your game is done bro.
You do know I lost my job to AI right? And a quick Google shows that thousands of others have this year too, with expectations of millions of job losses by 2030. AI progresses at an incredible rate, it doesn't get worse... This is some major copium from you I'm afraid :(
@@Nadestraight were talking about making good games, which takes years of hard work and creativity and decent sized teams, not about doing basic functions like place object xyz or make player jump. AI cant just make all ur art it would look inconsistent. So not copium bro. Otherwise everyone would be releasing the next baldurs gate or call of duty. You dont know what you dont know when making certain game features.
Point being; they have every reason to pretend its Artifical Intelligence. They have every reason to try and scare the living shit out of you. They are incentivized to do so. But really, we ought to be asking if inventing a "google search now copies other peoples work and pastes it within the confinement of your search query", is a good thing. Work on your game! Keep going and results WILL come. This depressing way of thinking will only bring you down and trust me, none of them (AI doom peddlers) are going to be held accountable to their lies and promises. They are just there for a quick buck. They did it with Crypto. They did it with COVID. Tomorrow will be something else. Hope sells. Fear sells better. At the end of the day, some useful generative algorithms will remain. But that will be all they are.
"My dream is gone!!1!"
No, lol. When AAA companies are making landfills of slop you can be like Spongebob with that single krabby patty
:D
the games are going to be ass if you ask ai to make an fps it gives you an un intresting game it cant come up with something unique like ULTRAKILL
I like how the AI techbros promised us that AI would replace rote and mundane jobs to free us to do creative things like art, music and videogames...
And then ai went on to replace the jobs in the art industry and jobs which people actually somewhat enjoy.
No one promised you anything. It just so happened to be that creative jobs are the ones that are easier to replicate.
Plagiarism has always been easier than doing work; AI is practically similar to a super advanced plagiarizer.
The irony that we've decided to automate the act of having fun should not be lost on us.
It was the artists who depicted the AI as victims of robot racism and the workers who hated them as bigots.
Either that or the AI is a genocide machine
I think that AAA companies will avoid AI for fully developing games (at least for now), but I do truly believe that those cheap mobile games are going to be flooded with AI content, they already were generating ads like crazy and this looks like the next step for those developers lol
Haha yeah for sure, AI generated games will be the new mobile asset flip
probably why most of them suck, i avoid them like the plague, they are all shitty cash grabs.
They already have been doing that
>:) Ferb I know what we're gonna do today
Feels almost vindictive how intensely AI developers targeting/trying to replace basically every creative industry. Like a, "You artists thought you were safe, but you're actually first to go!" from the people behind it.
It's also possible we just didn't notice it happening in less prominent industries, but it's rough regardless.
AI is also kinda a depressing topic, lol, I get why you'd like to leave the content behind. It's not boring, but it sure leaves a bad taste in your mouth.
This is the thing, Ai developers aren't targeting anyone. The goal is just creating AGI and AI that is more power than the previous iteration. The government's goal is for AI to be stronger than other countries' AI for military and economic power advantages. China is pouring billions into AI research every year now and they are getting close to AI of similar power to the models we have in the US. I can assure you the Chinese government does not care about using AI to make video game devs unemployed. It just so happens to be that creative works and art are the ones that are easier to replace than other, more manual and dexterous tasks. It's unintuitive because people mindlessly believed Art is someone that cannot be replicated and there's some "human"/ "soul" element in how we generate something but the truth is consumers buy something if they think it's worth the money, not if a product was made with AI or in today's case, child labor from Taiwan. It's not like AI researchers wake up and go like "how can I fuck with artists some more", Art, writing, creative tasks is just easier for AI to do at scale more so than pure logic and math skills at the moment. The goal is for AI to be good at those too of course it's just too much computation power and there's limitations of the current architecture to allow that and then computer science, data analytics, math and statistics jobs will slowly start to get replaced too (if it ever gets that good which I doubt we will see anytime soon).
A job is a job putting "creative" infront of it makes no difference
@@TuriGamer ok
Yet another reason why the number of indie game developers will grow.
Possibly, but I think it'll be AAA that benefits from this the most
@@NadestraightNot immediately. In the short term we’ll probably see a lot of ai slop flood the indie developer space, making even harder to succeed there as if it wasn’t already.
@@quaesitumspatium7751 I feel like the only way actual game developers will be able to make success games now is by showing themselves making their games to show that they aren’t AI generated to encourage people to play them once the actual lack of originality that exists in AI becomes obvious; AI can’t create, only replicate, so if indie developers start milking AI, people will become increasingly better at identifying an AI generated game based on the parallels that exist in other AI generated games, and at the same time, actual developers will start AI poisoning assets in their games, all of which will make it increasingly difficult for people to make games via AI as they’ll become too similar to other AI generated games and the games that were used for those AI generators.
@@Nadestraight i think what they mean is that AAA games will get worse. they already feel samey, and ai gets really good at doing one specific thing, the games that define a year or a decade are always unique, and break the formula because at their heart, games are art, and art isnt compelling if a person doesn't make it. its the same reason everyone hates AI art
@@Nadestraight AAA devevelopers doesn't use godot.. so no AAA devs are not benefiting from this lmao.
this is horrifying, in 3-5 years 50% of games are going to be soulless
to be fair most of them already are, there are a lot of pre-release rug pulls. imagine when you buy and AI generated game and the devs don't exist or have no idea how to code to fix the issues.
Yup, people will laugh at this now because it's "bad"... but in 3-5 years we'll all be saying "Wow, I didn't even know they used AI for this game"
@@Nadestraight I feel like actual game developers will begin to have to more frequently stream the development of their games to show that they aren’t AI generated and AI poisoning will become increasingly popular.
@@S-Fan2006 Consumers as a whole probably won't care even if a dev gets exposed. Also if they stream it someone will probably feed that to an AI lol.
Are they not already? If anything, "humans" getting the boot would greatly benefit the art. Those brainless, unevolved creatures keep uglifying everything, releasing buggy messes, and mutating everything into pay-to-win trash. Not to mention how creatively bankrupt they are when it comes to story. None of those "people" are worthy of sympathy, let alone support.
im studying software development. fuck
dont give up!
cause these models have limits and we have reached its peak
I am a software developer. If all we did was write code, I'd say be worried. But by the time you're no longer a junior, writing code is a small part of what you actually do.
It will make getting an entry level job much harder, and it's already one of the hardest to land, so that does suck. But it's always been the case, once you have some experience, you're golden.
Don’t worry and keep learning
Well better get back to studying because you don't seem to know a lot if this makes you panic. 😂
Again, its hard not to be pessimistic about the future of creative industries in general when tools like this keep coming out. Not only is it yet another AI tool that's going to be used to undermine workers' salaries and rights in creative industries and be a threat to their livelihoods, but it would also inevitably be used to churn out a bunch of slop content that makes even current AAA slop games like soulful by comparison.
It is a fault of games selling platforms if they can't manage publishing. That issue can be solved in many different ways, there is no way that making things harder to make is the best solution. Every time when barrier of entry got lower it was good for games.
@@KraszuPolis This isn't just about lowering the barrier of entry like say, making Unity and Unreal free to use for beginners did. This is the type of automation can and will kill wages and jobs, especially for anyone looking for an entry level job that one can build into a higher-paying career. We should support indie and beginner developers, but supporting tools that corporations are already using to justify laying off tens of thousands of workers isn't good for anyone in the long term, including the smaller and solo developers.
It's a good thing tbh , why waste time when an AI can do it in seconds, then you just have to polish the game
Gollum game could really only improved with this technology
The issue with the idea that AI will replace game developers, even in the next couple decades, is that it doesn't track with how AI is created and improved. Even studios with hundreds of games will not have enough training data to create an AI that can make something that rivals what a human developer could put out, especially when we talking about innovation, something that AI can't really do.
Plus, AI will plateau very soon. It already takes billions of dollars to train models that only rival human beings in very narrow areas and make mistakes often. Not to mention the energy consumption for training something like GPT-3 was the equivalent of running a nuclear power plant for a year.
So there's a lack of training data, and a lack of funding. I'm not worried in the least that AI video games will take of, just like I wasn't worried that Bitcoin would replace the dollar, or that NFTs were the next real estate boom.
You’re right, our technological level is not good enough to make such things however when fusion power and quantum computing comes it will be a different story
It will replace most of the work, but you will still need humans to manage it, give ideas, and polish ideas. You will need much less humans to make a game, but that could lead to games becoming much more specialized, it will be worth to make AAA games that appeal to niche markets. It will be worth to make AAA games with risky ideas, they will not have to appeal to "everybody" anymore.
@@georgekendjiya1013 IF fusion power comes. It has been "five years away" since before my Environmental Science teacher was born.
"look at how X turned out" look at how the latest stable diffusion version turned out and how PISSED the lazybones are now that their prompts are making eldritch horrors
🤣
every AI prompt sooner or later is some kind of fkin shadow paralysis demon or eldritch horror, that's just how the AI rolls
You sound like you have no idea what you are talking about
EA is 100% going to invest in this.
They'll rebrand to "EAI"
my dream job is gone now, thanks ai.
Not necessarily
If you really think that, maybe this isn't your dream job.
You can still do it as a hobby with no pay
@@Brain4BrainYou won't get as good doing it in your free time next to full time boring job trying to pay your bills. That's why many give up on their dreams
@@mikejohnson1370 All the highest rated indie games were made and released for free.
Rimworld 2, but npcs/pawn are sentient and scream in agony when they are in pain
AI generated music made me realize just how mid AI actually is, it will never have the soul
So I started learning how to draw and even help some new indie game developers so we can have more projects with actual passion behind them
I hate to say this but I don't agree with this one, AI generated music is actually one of the more convincing things I've found. It definitely took some time, initially the music was terrible, but after learning what prompts to give the AI, learning that writing your own lyrics provides better results, etc, I've created some very convincing AI music, that has fooled some people, and admittedly that I now listen to myself. I actually played 5 AI tracks in a livestream, and nobody batted an eye.
@@Nadestraight Yeah but as a "musician" (not pro one but still). AI music still lacks something compared to human generated one. The feelings behind the musician who made it, the reason, everything can be felt by their music.
Alright I'm just jealous that AI can make a song in 10 seconds while it takes me a few hours XDD
@@Nadestraight and also the fact that it copies from already existing music, so it can never be truly unique
Sure, an AI model can generate a simple top down game. However the step between that and actually generating a fun gaming experiences is huge. For it to output anything resembling something as complex as an enjoyable gaming experience, is something we most likely are decades away from. Remember, the machine doesn't understand what fun is, and for it to be able to create something unique that is enjoyable, it would need to understand what actually makes a game enjoyable. This is a question that is insanely difficult to answer as a game contains so many moving parts making it the piece of art that it is. The training that would be require is immense and that would most likely only allow it to create relatively simple games that doesn't stray to far in a specific genre.
Really interesting topic, but I believe this video sends the wrong message. Right now the gaming industry is flourishing, more jobs exist that ever before. Remember, the news headlines only focus on the bad news, they don't talk about all the indie studios blowing up or the 20000 jobs expected to be needed in the industry *in Sweden alone*. The point is if you are thinking about getting into the industry but you are afraid of AI taking your job. Don't be, AI will probably be an important part in the industry. Tools will be created which changes our workflow but even at the rate AI is progressing today, it got enormous challenges ahead before ever getting close to the doomsday scenario described in this video.
You're right with some of what you say, but you're also being incredibly naive I think. AI progresses at an incredible rate, saying we are multiple decades away from enjoyable and believable AI made games is a huge lapse in judgement of the situation. I think we're 5 years away from this producing something which some people will say is enjoyable. And yes, it'll be 2D games at first, stuff inspired by Mario/Sonic/Pokemon/Zelda/Megaman/Pacman etc. etc. etc. But that's the beginning. The beginning is not far at all, 5 years will fly by in the blink of an eye.
ai progresses exponentially not linearly. give it 2 years and compare it to this and you will be shocked.
@@JinMori07_ there is a limit it can’t grow exponentially endlessly
@@Nadestraight TLDR: AI faces more obstacles than just making an enjoyable game and AI making us more efficient or even making stuff that humans touch up might make jobs disappear at first but will create jobs in the long run as companies will have to scale up their games to stay competitive, larger scale means AI makes more mistakes for people to correct so more people will need to be employed to fix those mistakes. AI is causing multiple industry disruptions but I really don't think it'll erase any industry.
I do agree with you to an extent but I think you're a bit too on the gloomy end of things which I kinda understand because of what happened. AI might be able to create fully fledged games like that in 5 years, I think this will only make AI games the new measuring bar. You're assuming that what is enjoyable and believable will stay consistent from now until 5 years from now, you're also assuming that AI will just keep getting better and better exponentially and won't hit a ceiling. (For example self driving cars have hit a ceiling even though they were expected to take over the job of every single taxi, truck and delivery driver years ago. They say they are 99.9% there and yet getting that last 0.01% there is proving very very difficult for them due to driving situations that happen extremely rarely and also legal liability.) Once AI hits that point and everyone will be able to make games of a certain quality then that will become the new bar of quality to beat if you're hoping to sell your game. The whole "If everyone's super then nobody is" kinda deal. If everyone can make and release a 2D game inspired by Mario/Sonic/Pokemon/Zelda/Megaman/Pacman etc. which is already an extremely saturated space then every game in that space will need to stand out more (be bigger and better) to turn a profit.
I don't see the industry just being one programmer, one artist, one sound guy, one designer and one manager per company and everything else is done by AI since AI will allow us to make bigger and better games and this will mean AI will make more mistakes that people have to correct hence more jobs for people with skills that fix those mistakes. Game projects that are impossible to produce now even to AAA companies due to budget or resources will become possible with AI and I don't think it's far fetched it'll become a matter of time or even a race between these companies to be the first to market with these new megaprojects to capture a whole new audience. If this doesn't happen then we might even see new AAA companies arise because they were the ones that shipped these megaprojects first and beat the current gaming giants. I do agree it's the beginning but I feel like you think it's the beginning of 90% of developers in the game industry losing their jobs and not the beginning of a large amount of innovation of leveraging what AI can do to propel us higher. (Now this may be actually naive of me but I'm hoping AI will give AAA studios a kick in the ass to make something new once anyone in their garage can produce what they can)
Lastly there are many problems even outside of producing the game itself that face AI that will have to be solved, mainly the fact there's precedent that AI art can't be copyrighted. I'm unsure how this would work out with video games but I doubt studios would want their own IPs to be yoinked by anyone and everyone because their games are now produced by AI. This is just one example, more obstacles to rolling out AI made games could arise. Like the commenter above I do also believe this video sends the wrong message, but not because AI won't be able to produce enjoyable games in X timeframe but because you're not considering the consequences of that being case besides: "I guess everyone except the 3 best people in their field in the company loses their jobs now and all companies will pump out the same games and everyone will just buy it exactly like before and the market won't become ridiculously oversaturated and the AAA companies will make a trillion dollars in profit firing everyone, making themselves unable to scale up."
@@georgekendjiya1013 well yea no shit, but a triple AAA game is not a "endlessly" goal at all if you look at the quality of recent triple AAA games
Making video games is extremely complicated. There's a lot of moving parts that has to work together. Plus you are also dealing with human psychology and game design, which is quite abstract and therefore hard for AI to understand. I don't think AI alone will ever be able to make a video game thats remotely good. It will only be able to create smal and basic games or unplayable garbage.
AI will be able to speed up workflows and people will loose their jobs, but good games can only be made when humans are involved in the process.
Getting strong “fake it till you make it” vibes from this project.
But good games with effort and personalization and games that people actually enjoy, ai will not be able to make.
I think that is why tuber mentioned those few people that are left there. They still need some coders to clean up bugs and refine the mistakes AI does. They still need someone with artistic view to make sure the art says coherent & consistent (so that one character isn't weird lowpoly pixelation and another is hyperrealistic highly detailed one). And they still need designer or few that came up with some idea (or at least to refine the idea and make sure whole game reflects it). Yes AI can't make a game we would love but i can totally see how in future it may be possible for 3 to 60 people do games that currently take hundreds of employees. This might lead into either "AAA" games becoming very generic and boring... or maybe the fact that they have money and resources might lead into them starting finally competing against each other again and they might try to make games that are so massive that no AI can keep up with the scope. And because of so many layoffs there will be many MANY more indie studios that both will use AI and won't - that will keep making unique game experiences that stand out. If indie studio capable to making risks has about same amount of staff in their studio as some "AAA" studio has - if they essentially start to compete with same terms then i feel like that will force the "AAA" to use their resources smarter. (This all might be copium - i might totally be wrong with these guesses - maybe most AAA studios go bankrcupt instead if they start chasing unicorns that cost 0 dollars but in their eyes profit millions... maybe they start making same mistakes as some companies did with VR technology few years ago... maybe its crypto/NFT hype& crash loop again? We don't know - we will see soon what actually will happen with this new tech).
cmon dude, wake up, what it cant do now, it will do later anyways, accept it...
@@samamies88 you don’t need 100’s to make a good game
@@andreasazzi9696 no wake up to lasyness? I think your asking me to wake up and just lay down in bed ai is copying creativity its nothing without us
Ai can make good games if you are creative in writing. The only problem for now is quality which will get better and AAA trying to force political agendas on everyone which means you can still make games without it but it will take longer. People are lazy so most people will use it and try to pass themselves off as a game dev. I think society going to regret it because people will become dumber for not using their brains. I just flate out refuse to do that to myself. AI tools could be used to help people get their work done. This is what happens when everybody just learns to code but ignores the ethics behind what they are making.
I am just questioning every job, will this job be taken over by AI in the distant future? I am 17 and I am still picking my job. I want to be a chef, surely that job should we safe for some years. Right? 😅 AI is so scary because it is new and unpredictable. I watched the whole video. I hope you will be able to find a job!
Aw man, I've always wanted learn how to code and make a game and all that, but with all this AI stuff, I just feel it's a bit pointless to try learning how to use something like godot. I feel like if I were maybe 10 years younger or older, this would be a bit easier, since the technology would have time to progress to it's limit if I were younger, or I'd already had the chance to get a job if I were older, but I've just gotten out of high-school, and I have no clue which college courses are gonna be useless once I'm an adult. AI is genuinely scary for me, since I can't really predict what AI will learn to copy, and it's looking more and more like I won't be able to profit off of creativity, which is a damn shame.
Go learn game dev, ai is not going to replace game developers fully
At this point, just try. You will end up broke no matter what you choose in the end, you can't compete with robots no matter in what industry you gonna work in.
@@skele3776 it’s not going to happen until we have fusion energy and quantum computer
100% not actually making games. It's making videos. Why would a game have a.i. artifacts and morph into other characters? It wouldn’t. Because this is some fake tech company trying to get money and run
I noticed that too, the morph/Janus effect should not appear at all if this is recorded gameplay. The renderer appears to be creating only AI videos based on prompts.
Yeah, it didn’t look like a game to me
Nop, it is creating Godot game engine project that you can export as exactable game file.
@@vranigavrani if it's running in Godot, why doesn't it look like a normal game in Godot? Why did it not create static assets that you can move around in? Why does the character clip in front of objects and then behind them?
These aren't how game engines work, but it is how a.i. videos work
@@StephenHarperRaptagon Hey IDK but based on what its said and if its true than it does generate godot 3.5+ project that you need to import in godot and edit, debug and export on your own.
I can not find it to test on my own, author of this video did not leave his source, so i have as much info as you do, based on what he present in this video.
Honestly if you do keep up with ai and gaming videos, it'd be fun to see like a more depth or research put in.
It'd really boost the gaming vid quality
Based on what you have showed us, I think it is more likely a game customization engine. It's probably not ripping code since it is using Godot (and probably gdscript) which came out way after some of the games mentioned. Secondly, the limited number of game types implies that there is baseline code that it is modifying So, I expect this is far from an AI generated from scratch game.
Seeing AI like this makes me wanna vomit. Pure rot in digital form spreads like a plague, taking the very things that makes us human one by one. Humanity would soon be full of walking shells incapable of creativity, passion and complex thought. This is where ai is guiding us.
Vote with your wallets folks. Sure you can eat at Mcdonald's (see above)...or you can do a little bit of homework and reward developers who actually hand craft amazing experiences. It's also completely f'd that AI is stealing all the work of others and passing it off as it's own and no one can do anything about it. Just gross.
Wanted to become a game developed, i guess thats never gonna' happen :(
It'll be years until this thing is really good, you still got time! But better get your game out within the next 2-3 years!
People hate AI art. AI video games will be no different. People are already pissed that games are so cookie cutter. Do you really think people will enjoy reskinned variations of the same games a human actually made?
The job is the same as it's always been. Make a game that's original and innovative enough to stand out. Don't let linear algebra steal your dreams lmao
Don`t worry. It`ll never generate anything good.
Why can't you be a game developer? What does AI have to do you you being an indie game developer? I'm working on a game on Godot and I'm also studying algorithms and AI in college. If you are passionate about making games then this affects nothing
@@AbadonBIack You falsely assume that a project made with A.I cant compete with one made completely with out it. Also majority of gamers have been playing franchises that haven't changed in 5 plus years. Not enough people care for originality
Here's to the rise of Slop-tent 🍻
Events such as E3 and Summer Game Fest will become "Slopathon"
we truly live in the worst timeline
2010-2020 was the best, it's gone downhill ever since the pandemic
I guess it would take some time to train an AI to understand what makes a game fun to play. How to come up with fresh and unexpected game mechanics. How to balance the game to be playable as p2p between different player types. Even if you train an AI to generate concept art, what happens after the first draft? Would you like to 'discuss' your ideas and change requests with an AI?
remember, AI can never replace the "Human" feel of anything.
That's just not the case any more, I get fooled by AI music and AI drawings now, it won't be long before we all can't tell the difference
@@Nadestraight i still have hope, if we all get fooled i might be cooked. I want to go into the music field for my end career but it this keeps going i might just end up rotting away slowly 🤣
plus who would want to watch an ai in concert lol
Source: trust me bro
@@WorldWarWess-pb8iq This already exists basically, Hatsune Miku has millions of fans and sells out Arenas, and they just load up an mp4 file on a big screen
I am studying first year to become information and communications technology engineer and I am specializing in game development but right now I am really thinking if I should stop and study something like community pedagogy or social work instead :)
Looks extremely limited to me. Smells more like a cash grab from the developer to try to trick an investor into making him rich.
The fact that it can only create Godot games in specific genres tells me it’s not doing much in the way of game code. It’s probably just created assets for an already existing game template. That’s nothing to worry about if you’re a dev.
Yeah, looks like a scam
@@georgekendjiya1013 It 100% is fake it til you make it. They have nothing but a video edit and an idea at best.
They can get bots to buy it then and play it too.
I don't think players will comply with bad developed games that has no creativity and bring nothing new in gameplay, art design, or challenge. If the industry get the AI, but keep not creative and bad payed employee, they will certaintly lose for those that also use AI but keep the greatest geniuses, master and creative artists, designer and programmers.
History has make books easier to write, but the ones that sell a lot are the good ones, not the random copies that always circle around.
Creating small puzzle games with Claude 3.5 Sonnet is fun, yet requires knowledge how coding works to get anything semi-usable. I can imagine anything creating a 3D game with a single prompt is closer to a downloaded template, which requires thousands of hours of additional work to get anything more than janky prototype. If that Render can’t reiterate the “project” with you after initial generated version, then it’s kinda useless.. imho
You don’t really learn creativity you unlock it through engaging your brain creatively using ai is just lazy
I'd say you do learn creativity. For example, graphic design, I learnt through tutorials and documentation, to play an instrument you read sheet music and have someone teach you how to tune a guitar for example, to create 3D models you go to college/ uni and watch youtube videos or in-app tutorials in blender, to learn pottery you'd go to a pottery class and copy the teacher, etc. etc. etc.
@@Nadestraight or is that learning to unlock creativity?
If AI can mimic something like coding then non-art related jobs are also on the line. Engineers, Lawyers, hell maybe even Doctors will start to be threatened as well.
We need legal action on this technology asap. In the pursuit of automation tech-nerds have stepped on a landmine that will send ripples through the very foundations of our current societal structure.
Automation of this scale is almost anathema to our capitalist society because workers also play the role of consumers. If the plan is to remove the workforce with machines who are you going to sell anything to? The workers you laid off will have no money to consume your goods anymore.
Even if it's just the 1% left is it just going to be a bunch of rich dudes in a mountain trading with legions of automatons?
The only type of society where this "we need to automate EVERYTHING" mentality fits is one that doesn't value goods and services. This is going to be the economic equivalent of the nuclear bomb in the long run.
Humans still need to descover stuff so doctors may not be at risk of being replaced by AI
Cash grab is bad now, I can't image the flood of cash grab games that's coming our way.
the ultimate combination of all your topics, lol
The perfect video haha
Its crappy now, but considering that probably a lot of other people are making their version as well and open source is very promising.
Perhaps this is what the gaming industry exactly needs.
Nothing stops either Sony or Microsoft and even Nintendo from doing this either..
Big gaming companies will not be able to compete with independent developers if anybody will be able to make AAA games. I still think there will be a long time when human insight, ideas, and humans adding details/fixing odd things that AI will make will be important.
well, I hope AI doesn't take my dream job. I wanted to work with Cybersecurity, but, who knows? Brazil normally gets pretty late in these things
I watched your heart condition video. Well, at least you're doing better nowadays
man.. hey yo dafutt goin on boah, cody aint make it in today, he was late
Lay almost everyone off = most people can make their own games, and they'll be competing directly with millions of others. Your idea makes no sense, unless we prevent people from using these tools.
The bar for creativity hasn't been lowered much, but the bar for crafting has.
Be ahead of the curve, not behind.
The guy who made this looks as soulless and robotic as Mark Zuckerberg himself.
Maybe, it will be opportunity for those laid off talented people, who now will be able to independently create a game. And good game. Not like these big publishers, who will continue to produce garbage. I very much doubt, that AI will be able itself create something really good. It still will need a lot of human work.
"I want the AI to code Python for me" -JMAA
Maybe I'm mistaking your comment, but this is already a thing haha
@@Nadestraight It was a quote from a really old video before I got out of the alt-right where I was using Talk to Transformer to devise the "design document" of a videogame as a sort of Sam Hyde-esque comedy sketch. I was clearly in my pre-coming-out-as-trans phase there too.
Why do you think Marketing and Social employees are safe? I've seen a lot of AI activity in those spaces, too. The only people who are truly safe are the ones with the money. So everyone else will be at their mercy (or lack thereof).
Please do more videos related to AI
I'll try! Gotta find a way to make them interesting to make, as people find them interesting to watch but they're kinda boring to make
What is this ai tool? Can you send me a link to it?
Looking up "Render" or "Render ai video game" I can't find anything since it's such a commonly used word.
userender.com/
Bruh you know ai can create code right? It doesn’t have to rip some old code from who knows where
At least handymen are in ai safe zone. Right?
Wronggg haha
Na, the miserble gits at tech bro land are coming for that too, they are already trying to make robots with more manual dexterity. They want to ruin everyones fun. Soon they will have to A.I generate their customer base too. Stupid b**stards!
In theory this will be able to make incredible games, you see, most ai gpts know all the code of linux for example. If you know all the code you can utilze it very quickly, it will essentially transform ideas into games without all that effort on the part of the developer. The question is, what will the limitations be, if you have every made ai music you know what i mean about limitations being a huge problem
is there a link to this ai you talking about, if i search ai render game is dont find it. calling a ai something like "render" is useless since tha it a common word in itself. hard to search for then.
Userender.com
Excellent 😆 ive not watched the video yet but this is exactly what i was affer from a video 😂
This is why nintendo and all of you game developers need to hurry up the retro original games or its gone and dissappear for ever by AI with "TEETHS AND A GIANT OCTOPUS", you done it people, you just had to let it happen, Now the AI tree effect begins to grow MORE spreads, How obvious are we doing this?
It`ll most likely never generate anything good.
Correct
Sure… let’s wait a bit and see
@@iloveusa1988 Until AGI comes 😂
@@iloveusa1988 I don’t think LLMs can generate fully fledged games
Bro, i didn't even started 😍 ain't no way future me gonna need to compete with AI generated games, by unknown authors with no game dev history. Will be anything fun left, that pays allat money? I wished to liv in LA in the future 🙄now everybody will dead broke, nd' only way to get huge bags of money is just by scamming others. Even with UBI, you would never afford to liv even better, nd' you will be stuck in one place, always. You won't have job, no career, nothin' to strive for, society will become even more alienated nd' wealthy nepo babies will get richer, if the AI won't be regulated and platforms won't fighting against it, cuz AI economically won't benefit no-one on the internet, in the long run. AI will completly make internet unusable, and soon you won't even know if ur online friends aren't AI too.
Are programmers trying to loose their own jobs now?
"AI programmer" will be the only job left
"Go-DOT" lol
That's how some of us say it, I know others pronounce it "go-dough" or whatever haha
@@Nadestraight could the majority be wrong? 😳
Oooh that explains why ubisoft keeps just pumping crap out 🤣🤣
Ubisoft is the king of ripoff games / cheap immitations
And how exactly will this affect me, as a consumer?
Data collection and loss of privacy/ constant surveillance is a major concern with AI. Games generated with AI could start recording your play-data, grabbing your data such as name/email/phone/address and sharing that data to other companies etc. There's also the concern of consumer bias, AI can preduct what to present to you based on your history, meaning your potential to discover something new could be lowered. You might start getting recommended the same kind of games, or maybe a game leads you down a specific path based on data, rather than letting you roam around. Etc.
If you do no care about what you support it may come back and bite you. If you are not concerned about what happens to other people then why should anyone be concerned about what happens to you? People do not care because it does not affect them until either the same thing happens to them or it affects them indirectly. If you keep giving money to unscrupulous companies do not be shocked if they start trying to influence with governments in ways that are not good for you. This is aleady becoming a problem.
@@Nadestraight China and the Three letter glowies already spy on me. There's feds listening through every microphone in my house. They know where I live they know every damn move I make they will come for me. AI is just another means to see what I do. Who am I to care if a fed that's watching me gets replaced with an AI? Same outcome.
@@Nadestraight The 3 Letter agencies are already spying on me. China is already spying on me, what does it matter if my personal fed that monitors me gets replaced with ai?
We'll see how this ends up. Have you seen the crypto bubble meme where the whole team; CEO, CTO and CFO, are the same person with different names and hair?
In any case; the only authentic AI project I could find listed, was insightAI. Its limited at best. Its a form of "Find me shit in Pubmed publications". Useful. For sure. But that is not making games on a prompt like it is presented here. They are miles appart. It doesn't add up.
AI spits out best solutions from thousands of failed attempts. And they are therefor often partially wrong. Games cannot be wrong. They have to be exact. Else they do not work. Hell, GPT spits out shit code on a frequent basis. What they show here, is unlikely real.
My guess is its all presentation fluff and no, to barely, substance. Don't doom and gloom too much. Its bad for your health. Bubbles happen.
"The barrier for creativity" has definitely been lowered. I think you're a little too close to the subject and that's affecting your interpretation of this statement. It's not the same as saying that anyone can be as creative as a skilled experienced creative professional at the touch of a button, which seems to be how you interpreted it.
This is a complex and nuanced topic, that I cannot suitably express in a simple UA-cam comment, so I expect many will read things into my statement which was not intended. All I am saying, is that statement alone is true, and does not necessarily mean what you think it means. I am not saying anything about this being good or bad, or diminishing the damage this is doing to real people.
You dint even mention the paper released by google called 'Genie' (Generative Interactive Env) Also your explanation as to how AI makes these games is very wrong. It doesnt dig up some old game code.
That wasn't my explanation, I never claimed to know how it works. That was a speculation/ possibility. I also haven't ever heard of this Genie thing you mentioned, I'll have to look into it some time
And why did you actually in your video record some side game and not AI generated? Very strange. I've hoped to see a lot of AI games
I did show the game which was AI generated, I inserted their video showcasing the game, maybe you didn't make it to that part?
the trash company frvr is also working on an Tiktok like Game Generator Ai
Never heard of them but I'll take a look
whats the link to the site? i couldn't find it.
The creators original post: x.com/michaelgold3n/status/1800569521855779106
The site: userender.com/
@@Nadestraight This looks mega dodgy. It looks like it's just a means to farm people's data: emails and social links.
good for blueprints don't use it fully
Farming emails and social links.
Very, very dodgy site. No substance at all.
Not sure, Leonardo AI was basically the same thing when it started, just a sign-up page. We'll see how this unfolds. If nobody gets access within the next few weeks then maybe it's time to do another video about how this was a scam.
@@Nadestraight Yeah, hopefully it isn't, but it is odd.
AI ultimately did not make the game. It was still prompted by a human. This will be a tool. If we get to a level where AI can prompt other AI with creative thought, we'll have other things to worry about.
AI development trends are, in the majority, decided by India and China. You do still have a chance to make something unique on the market when you take a look at what's illegal to do in India and China and what's culturally appropriate to their eyes. Try to implement the opposites at the core of your creation. Do not become a sell-out to them.
Get a job sir. I care for you. This UA-cam thing looks out of reach barely at the fingertips. So close yet so far
Ps. I'm just playing a stereotype. Love you bro.
Easier said than done haha, I've applied for 30 graphic design positions last month and only heard back from 2 or 3. I remade my resume and portfolio too with updated/ better work and more recent career history. Rough times right now.
Fck it go full UA-cam brother
@@Nadestraight make sure to put all keywords to your resume from job application, they use ai to filter through resumes
nade try not to make a AI video challenge impossible
(gone wrong)
You didn’t bother to make one and show it? And instead show random gameplay footage. Lazy
I literally showed it in this video multiple times... what are you talking about? I bet you didn't even watch the video
can we like.. stop making ai better
I don't think that will ever happen, AI will become faster, more accurate, and therefor better than humans eventually
Bro tbh your doing too much theorycrafting and speculation. AI sucks at making stuff , it lacks spirit. You are acting like AI just linearly goes up exponentially at getting better, that not how it works bro. And sure AI can provide code, but if you don't know how to fix the bugs, your game is done bro.
You do know I lost my job to AI right? And a quick Google shows that thousands of others have this year too, with expectations of millions of job losses by 2030. AI progresses at an incredible rate, it doesn't get worse... This is some major copium from you I'm afraid :(
@@Nadestraight were talking about making good games, which takes years of hard work and creativity and decent sized teams, not about doing basic functions like place object xyz or make player jump. AI cant just make all ur art it would look inconsistent. So not copium bro. Otherwise everyone would be releasing the next baldurs gate or call of duty. You dont know what you dont know when making certain game features.
@@Nadestraight No, I think he is right. I heard your story. But if you knew how these images are generated, you'd stop calling it AI.
Point being; they have every reason to pretend its Artifical Intelligence. They have every reason to try and scare the living shit out of you. They are incentivized to do so. But really, we ought to be asking if inventing a "google search now copies other peoples work and pastes it within the confinement of your search query", is a good thing.
Work on your game! Keep going and results WILL come. This depressing way of thinking will only bring you down and trust me, none of them (AI doom peddlers) are going to be held accountable to their lies and promises. They are just there for a quick buck. They did it with Crypto. They did it with COVID. Tomorrow will be something else. Hope sells. Fear sells better. At the end of the day, some useful generative algorithms will remain. But that will be all they are.
yo
yo
yo
@@zecreator2058 yo
Yo
@@mhitomorales4497 yo
This world was so good before ai came in.. took my job now my hobby GGs..
Very true, take me back 10 years
Indie games then.