Diana actually broke her own heart Prince Charles didn't love her she thought she could change that with all her love in her heart. But they produced William and Harry so that's what the family wanted. A fantastic blood line. RIP Princess Diana 👸
I think if she’d have kept her legs closed that maybe Charles and Diana would’ve had a better chance at making it a go with their marriage . But Cowmilla just couldn’t give him up and Charles was the same way . But I feel like that if Cowmilla would’ve stayed away and told Charles NO then he would’ve . And maybe in time he could’ve loved Diana .
I think the commentator said it best: "...if Camilla and Charles were allowed to marry from the start, then Andrew Bowles and Diana Spenser would have been spared divorces" ... and could both be married to spouses who not only appreciated them, but they could have led a life of peace and quiet instead of upheaval, chaos and misery. Diana might also still be very much alive OR lived longer than she did.
He used Dianna to have children they needed a young lady to ensure they were healthy as history shows if any disability they’d say they died but they were put in asylums in America they are disgusting
But then Diana's story wouldn't have happened. No people's princess, no Prince William. Or Prince George, for that matter. Sigh. People only see what they want to see.
What I think makes not a jot of difference to the way things are. Can't stand her at any price or Charles. Both of them have hides as thick as rhinoceros skin. The whole concept of an over privileged family is distasteful when so many hard working people in UK are having to use food banks. Only two in that family I have any time for are Anne and Harry albeit for different reasons.
When Diana confronted Camilla it was 1989 and Diana was having an affair with James Hewitt. She had been shagging him for 3 years. And before that she had an affair with her married Bodyguard Barry Mannake in 1985/86. Camilla knew about Hewitt! Charles used to let Diana and Hewitt stay at Highrove with the boys! These were important little details that Diana left out when she was regaling her story about confronting Camilla.
Sadly the Royal Family made so many lives miserable because of their silly rules. Had it not been for them Diana would probably have lived a obscure upper class life, raising children she could have cherished for a much longer time than she got to be with her beloved William and Harry.
@@streaming5332 Once she realized what she had gotten herself into do you think that they would have let her have her children, which were what she adored the most?
@Sapphire Sea Do you realize just how many times the Monarchy of England has changed hands and families? The institution may be old but with every change of family, the rules change. They are a family that up until now has been filled with incest which produced generations of hemophilia and other maladies. Sometimes tradition can be a curse. The Queen has brought a lot of people misery because of her relentless rules. She made her sister miserable, she made her son miserable, at times she made her husband feel less than a man. The Queen was well aware of Charles’s affair with Camilla, she didn’t stop it, even though she knew it was tearing his marriage apart. I believe that makes her a hypocrite.
Charles also made a comment right after Queen died that he intends to ride out being the King until he dies. He said blah, blah he’ll follow mummy’s footsteps for however long he has left. So I don’t think he plans a few short years and out. I’m afraid William will be the doddering old 70 something by the time he gets there. They are just too damn healthy these days.
Charles has more experience, for the time being , plus William and Kate are too busy with other projects very useful ones. Theh also have 3 young children and Kate wants to be a real attentive mum.1
I can't believe how the Royal Family accepting & promoting Camillia through the years, a devious, calculating home breaker, but the sweet, vivacious, fun & energetic Princess Diana was put down by the Queen & family during her marriage to Charles. They were vicious to Diana & the emotional hurt she was going through with her husband cheating on her the whole time with Camillia, was considered "weak" by the Queen & family. People forget how cruel the Queen was to Diana, not making a tribute to Diana after she died for a couple of weeks. Until she was criticized by the British people, then she paid a tribute to her. Howecsoon we forget. It discusses me to see her called " Queen Consort. She doesn't deserve that title & she sure hasn't earned it.
the correct title for Diana was not Princess Diana ... it was Diana, Princess of Wales as she was married to the Prince of Wales ... Camilla is Princess of Wales but she does not use that title, she has several from which to choose & she will be Queen Camilla ...
@@bnic9471 You are so wrong, Diana was too self-centered to keep her husband's love. In what way was she too self-centered? loo at all her charity work she did, for people that had aids, just one of the many things she did in the publics eye. We the British loved Diana and always will, and we will never in our hearts for get Diana or forgive Camila and Cheating husband Charles. what they did to Diana.
@@bnic9471 I don't think Diana was a saint, but looks at what Charles and Camilla did to her. Camila was the selfish one. What is Diana self centred about? Your view is very skewed.
‘I’m afraid to me she’ll always be an adulterous, she should have left them alone and I’m sure they would have been happy.She caused Diana so much misery and unhappiness.
Camilla had to be jealous of Diana's beauty absolutely. And jealous of the way everybody outside of the senior family loved Diana. People say it was like Prince Charles was the frog prince who did not change back but Camilla is like a frog too, so they go well together.
@@actual_doge3221 how rude you are. You don’t know anything about these people. Why on Earth would Camilla be jealous of Diana? You’re just assuming that. Looks aren’t everything you know.
If prince Charles dies before her and I was William I'd get rid of her as soon as possible they had no say when Charles married his mistress who hurt their mother
I'm sure the two boys, now young men, will act civilly as grown adults. Camila has problems of her own. The UK people will have to deal with her in some way. It will be interesting to see how history plays out.
Mistress are winning .this is goals for mistress's.its just like a stripper marrying a basketball player etc..u just don't kno wen wen u will hit the jackpot
Camilla was always Charle's only love. The crown forced him into "settling" for Diana -- it was essentially an arranged marriage. Both Diana and Charles were victims.
The Secret Service should have warned her to stay far away from the Prince of Wales, as it was obvious to all, she was trouble, big time trouble maker, wrecking a Royal Marriage. .
He didnt choose her Love choose her. You have to watch. You could. Fall in love with the wrong kind of person. You could fall in love with a fat person or a augry person or a bad person. Cause love makes the choose.
It disgusts me when women do this to other women!! You don’t comment on the mens’ appearances!!😡😡. THIS is why men run the world. Women are too busy tearing each other down rather than supporting. 😡
True! He was very jealous of Diana because she was more popular than he was. He always loved the horse face. He never loved Diana and fulfilled his duty to produce an heir and a spare. Diana was used!! Did you see the look on Diana's face when Charles said, "Whatever love means'? I think she wondered then what she had gotten herself into. She had her reservations about marrying him. What Charles ever sees in that ugly thing is beyond me.
That’s what Charles needed…someone who is so unattractive, he’ll always look better than he does. Camilla had a “reputation” from an early age… she’s an immoral, lying cheater. She’ll make a perfect queen for a dying institution. Charles has put the nail in the monarch’s coffin.
Camilla is simply disgusting to have ruined a family, she could have kept away once Charles was married and became a father, it's a big SIN committed on her side
Yes it was a big sin what this woman did. And she will answer to our Lord Jesus Christ. Diana is an angel in heaven she should have not be dead she should be alive and enjoying her family she will forever be a queen to everybody around the world she was loved more than anybody I could think of we miss her we love her she's beautiful always will be may God bless you forever in Paradise Diana
I do believe Chales pursued her. The Coward could have married against the queens wishes (witch) and save Diana his ridicule. Pompous ass that he is; he deliberately abuse Diana and gaslighted her with Camilla. It has to be the desire for the crown that wove such a disgusting mess. The man has all the charm, looks and nobility of a Basset Hound.
@@cynthiamurillo7548, You may want to dial back your judgement. Charles bears the majority of the blame here, and has much to answer for, for his choices. If only he kept his wandering gaze averted, and his zipper locked. She didn't exactly trap him.
Ultimately, a grown man, 13 years senior to a barely 19 year old girl, who was simply too young and inexperienced to have developed her own personal foundation as an adult person, and apparently believing in social myths that young girls do…married her “Prince Charming”, only to find herself married to Charles…he is the one responsible for the pain his young wife experienced, Parker-Bowles was simply his actual “wife”. Diana was his brood mare. She came from an Aristocratic background, but wasn’t prepared for the role she had been relegated to from the beginning with Charles. She wanted to be loved by her husband, whom she didn’t really know, or have much in common with as a basis to build an actual relationship upon. That being said, he broke any chance of the marriage succeeding with his Camilla relationship, and his own rather narcissistic sense of privilege and entitlement. He seems to be far more like his Hanoverian ancestors than as a poster child for the Windsors. Well he will be King. The Brits and the Commonwealth will just have to live with it.
Diana wasn't too young or inexperienced; she was a genuine young woman who upstaged the entire family. And, considering that Charles was a chauvinistic jerk, he wasn't about to tolerate that! Diana had a lot of smarts, but wasn't allowed to use them.
@@susanmetz9892 the guy was an Earl. As an Earl, a member of the Peerage, just what do you think he would say to HRH The Prince of Wales when asked for his daughter’s hand in marriage. One of his three daughters he had turned over to Nannies, Servants and Governesses to actually raise. The man’s wife was the daughter of a romance novelist who hadn’t much use for her stepdaughters. And having been cut off from her mother by the Earl, the Grandmother, and Brit Courts, just who do you think the girl could turn to for non-biased advice? She had no one, really like in her corner
But, can you accept what Diana did to him? She wanted to elope with her bodyguard very soon in the marriage! Instead of learning to ride horses, she was giving rides to Captain Hewitt, the Pakistani surgeon, Dodi....!
@@dwiggi3rd504 She could have taken the trouble to learn who he was instead of seeking a fantasy figure. No rewal person would have satisfied her infantile need.
What the two of them did will never go away. Some people will accept it, others will not. That she will always be a constant reminder. Of a woman who was run down by the paparazzi And how she inserted herself into this woman's life until she got what she wanted. She got her man, and her competition is pushing up daisies. In my humble opinion, they should have skipped The two of them since they are so Scandalous And moved on to Diane's son Will and his wife. After all, this is the same thing that happened to Queen Elizabeth's uncle. they replaced him after he Gave up his crown to be with this woman.
TOTALLY agree. And unlike H&M, the uncle and his wife respected the RF and caused no drama at all when he abdicated. They went away and lived their lives out in comparative silence: praying H&M take the hint.
The whole world loves Williams and Kate they are a good example of their grandparents Queen Elizabeth and Philip.The people of England should abdicate Charles and Don't you think it is very disgraceful for the whole world that this sinful pair were to ruled England I think the whole hate her during the Queen funeral Charles was asked by the public why should the public pay for the100 million £ they don't feel disgrace and still wanted the throne that is all about selfishness and greediness.
How. Could Charles have made his mistress a queen, , when the whole country detested her for wrecking a marriage with no thought of the two young children involved
This whole mess gets even worst, it destroyed an entire family. Now in 2022 Lady Di beautiful sons, are at odds. This whole situation, is aweful, only pure prayers could create a difference and peace. I don't approve of this woman period. You don't steal husbands and be honored for breaking up a family. The boys are still hurting.
Hello Rose ,how are you doing ?its nice meeting you ,well am new just ,don't know if we can be friends so we can get to know ourselves more better what do you think about that ?
Agree. The sight of her next to Charles instead of Diana is sickening. What a couple. He an adulterer and she a home wrecker. Given all of this ugliness, if he had any decency he would have abdicated and let William be King. Long live the memory of beautiful Diana!
@@happygrandma2732 Yes, it's truly disgusting. I can't support the RF now - every sight of these two sitting side by side in such an important, vital position, is sickening to me also. I don't see the monarchy lasting much longer.
Charles and camilla loving each other isn’t the issue, I done think most people actually give a damn, the issue is of how many people they have hurt and used over the years They have behaviour in a disgusting way towards to both their previous partners and hurt their children If they loved each other so much then Charles should have had the balls to step aside (like his great uncle did) The queen had other sons not they they are any better but the monarchy would have continued
The truth that most try to simply cover up but which can't be simply 'moved on from' is that the CHARACTER of Charles was fully revealed to the world, and that disgrace can never be fully erased, just as the adultery of Bill Clinton will never be erased. Who would ever trust a king who acted in the morally weak way he did - can we really believe he could be trusted to rule responsibly and fairly when he had such reckless attitude towards such an important role, and especially towards his own WIFE and children? He should have not married Diana but gone to his girlfriend and abdicated from any chance of becoming king. That would have at least been honest! Unfortunately there are very many people today who want to get whatever they 'feel entitled to' in this life, no matter who else they may harm or crush, or even unfortunately kill, in the process - and that, although we may not believe it, will eventually bring their downfall.
Very surprised and disappointed the Queen hasn't taken very needed steps to ensure the Crown will be secure. It seems to me the UK will be under threat of destruction once Charles takes the reins. He's weak & will go along with all other politicians rather than stand for what's good for England & the Commonwealth.
I am pretty sure the affair was public knowledge already. A flirt, she is a home wrecking Trollop. A liar and user. All the while pretending to be Dianna's friend. How cute, she followed in her grand mother's foot steps as a mistress. What I would like to know, is did these two ever as much as apologize to Dianna and William and Harry? When you cheat on your spouse, you're cheating on your whole family. Quality time that you could have, should have spent with young children. Especially with the amount of traveling the royals do. I am sure that no one is going to lose any sleep over my opinion but I cannot respect or trust either one of them. It totally irked me watching the hypocrite walk behind her coffin.
She hurt a lot of people who got in the way of her selfishness!!! The 2 sons of the queen are no real prizes with their morally bankrupt behavior. Will never be able to see them in a positive light. Can't believe how people grovel at their feet!!!
True. Public adultery in this worst kind...for a King? Absolutely no. Head of Church! No morals at all. We DNT want an Antichrist system. But renew European virtues. Dnt get me wrong. Of course I don't compare them to any kind of Antichrist. But it s just wrong in many ways! Also for Diana s sons! I don't think, they ever could be happy of such title. NO! And it dsnt have anything to do with, if I like her or not. It's morally wrongful! I'm a Christian and Europe is STILL CHRISTIAN! RENEW your virtues ...folks! In this spiritual warfare you CNT adjust to Immorality! God hates it! Get a new soul n ❤! She can be named another title. Much lower. Out of respect for Diana. Her boys. And morality itself. Not to mention for the Head of Church establishment. If tht comes true...the downfall of Europe and the West will be faster. Nobody can want that! Renew your virtues and think and finally become more spiritual again. Traditional...or it s the end of the West...
Dtarla Baucum oh stop Will and Harry have movd on so should you Andrew Parker Bowles also after his dvorce he married his mistress he had while married to Camilla Diana would be over it she had more to look to in her life she was making pece in her life when she was taken from us
I would be outraged if my Father was responsible for my Mother’s extreme pain!!! William and Harry should show total discuss for this woman!!! I have come to believe that this is totally acceptable to the Royal Family. I have lost considerable mount of respect for the British Crown!!!! My mom was a Brit and I don’t think she would appreciate what the royal family is doing. Just food for thought.
@@Bdermady, He's pointing out that you have stated "discuss" instead of "disgust"; and also you have stated, "mount" instead of "amount". His question mark after illiterate was a reference to YOU!
I love these celebrities who are "committed" to environmentalism but jet around in private planes and live in mega-mansions. Rules are for the peasants.
Yes, entitled people find it easy to dictate to others various restrictions while placing none on themselves. They do not NEED to be 'working royals'...the world would not fall apart without them having to open every engagement, social event, give speeches, be seen to care for the commoners etc
Real royalty are the people who work for the masses. I think people should be in positions of royalty because they earned it. Princess Anne seems more fitting to be the ruler of the UK and not her brother Charles. She actually looks likes she'd serve the people and would be worthy of being treated like royalty.
@@kgosigadijoy I agree princess Anne would make a great queen. Charles has already been a little rude! He will have to eat what him and Camilla cooked up. People don't forget, if he's resentful because people don't like the rottweiler, he needs to step down. I couldn't even watch the service because they would show that rottweiler, can't stomach her. Still think he should have abdicated and handed it over to William and Kate or Princess Anne.
Camilla's father, Bruce Shand, was a British army officer and war hero, and her mother, born Rosalind Cubitt, was the granddaughter of Alice Keppel, the famed mistress of King Edward VII. Seems to run in the family.
@@bluerobin8743 give me a break, she had a choice. It’s called talk to her husband, or move… or say no. Or go to the media, and tell the public, file charges many things she could have done, she continued to call him all the time, she made the cuff links and delivered to him on the day of his wedding. They are BOTH equally at fault, and they could not care less who they hurt!
I was talking about your rude and snide comment about her ancestor. The King is never at fault for having mistresses only women are at fault. British people have a thinking as backward as tribals residing in forests. This entire saga proves it. For everything blame the woman, her dead ancestors but never the powerful Kings who played with people's lives for fun. I couldn't care less for all this prudishness.
Yep totally agree ....... and we can't see your boat race, but your ugliness shines through In your comment of spite and malice 😉......you could preen yourself to within an inch of your life and you will still be mutton dressed as lamb.
@@sybilreid9601 Glad to hear the people in the Commonwealth countries are not guillable about who she truly is. But, who knows one little visit from him & her to the Commonwealth countries and the leaders and people may very well roll out the red carpets, curtsy to her & him then feast with him & her in a style fit for a king & queen.
@@dmoffatt8354 That's your opinion dear! Being an Austrlian, I am A PROUD OF This country, Yes and I have much LOYAL ADMIRATION for OUR STOIC QUEEN!! SHE IS AN INSPIRATION ❤🧡💛 She needs ALL of The COUNTRIES she GOVERNS! NOT ONLY ENGLAND! Don't take this the wrong way! Or get upperty. Just let's All get behind HER!!❤
@@sybilreid9601 Forgetful aren't you? I responded to your comment saying, "Most of the Commonwealth are not very happy about her either! And that's just putting it politely!" I presumed you were referring to Camilla, not QEII.
Diana was also having an affair before Harry was born with her riding instructor, bear in mind she was no shrinking violet and after Harry, she also had affairs, people wake up, she used the Royal Family too!!
@@anny1_232 Doesn't seem to be turning out that way. I guess with the Queen gone it's a matter of what Charles wants, he gets! Perhaps he has more in common with Ms Markle than we realised.
@@goldenautumn3073 yes, I agree there seem to have been some changes. Charles is ok, he’s a good man and will make some much needed updates to the monarchy. And he’s far happier now than he ever was with Diana. They just weren’t suited and it was a tragedy for both of them.
isunami82 Oueen knows at her age that holding a grudge too long is not good for the brain or the heart Diana if she were alive today would be in a different place in her life as well focused on her causes and her children and grands and maybe her and Charlie could be on nice terms as we get older we learn old grudges are not important our eternal peace is
It's amazing how much a mother will put up with to appease her children. I believe Camilla has proven herself to be a decent person. I used to be so angry at her over Diana but finally opened my eyes and realized Diana wasn't the saint I had believed. Diana was human. Like all of us. She and Prince Chucky should never have been married.
@@totesgene yep at least 7 times, including the ginger haired Mark Dyer. It's not a secret here, but the USA seem to still think the tabloids propaganda, it was those in the press who killed her. Charles was faithful until the separation and his first relationship was with Jemima Khan
If Diana's heart was broken, it was broken a long, long time before Charles took up with Camilla again. Diana knew well before she married Charles that he didn't love her, so she should have been reconciled to that, and yet she married him anyway--she could hardly have backed out, and there was all that wealth and position to be had.
@@viktoriaironpride4977 I can understand her when I was her age. Now at 51, I’d love to marry someone with immense wealth who wanted nothing to do with me. She didn’t know at her young age that 20+ years later she’d have it all.
Traditionally throughout history, European royals were only allowed to marry other royals (the idea of allowing them even to marry the next rung down of aristocrats was essentially an innovation of the 1920s, necessitated by the "shortage of princes" and surplus of princesses due to the casualties of World War One). Therefore, it was very common for a king to be married to a queen whom he had never met before the wedding - chosen for political reasons - who would have children by him, but otherwise live her own life in another part of the palace; while to have have a romantic/social relationship with someone he actually liked the king would take a mistress. It's really only been in the last couple of generations that royals have been able to choose their partners, and therefore don't need mistresses anymore.
@@monikorasort : sorry, but I can´t understand, why Britain needs any thrones at all ....for what? For those old reptile aristocrats? There are all bloody bastards, in my opinion 🧐😕😨
Hello Judy ,how are you doing ?its nice meeting you ,well am new just ,don't know if we can be friends so we can get to know ourselves more better what do you think about that ?
She was wholly responsible for the failure of Diana & Charles's marriage. She could have severed ALL ties with him and given his marriage a chance. The fact that she had the brass neck to be with him the night before his wedding just proves that she had absolutely NO intention of letting their relationship end!. What he sees in her, I really don't know. She smokes like a chimney as her wrinkled face shows! Diana was beautiful, both inside and out. I hope this marriage wrecker NEVER becomes Queen! 🤬 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
Diana was a wonderful beautiful woman. She was kind to everyone and loved her boys passionately. Charles should have been a better man. This is all his fault if you ask me. no one did ask but I'll say it anyway. Camilla should be ashamed to show her face! And to wear Diana's jewelry! I loved princess Diana so much. She was a beautiful woman inside and out
I feel the English people will NEVER allow this. Should charlie try to see that through will be the end of the monarchy. there WILL be riots as have NEVER been seen before. bitch WILL have to leave pommy land
Rubbish. The marriage was ill fated but I believe Charles was trying to make it work. They were just too different, and he was in love with Camilla, and trying not to be, and trying to do the right thing, and it not working out. Diana just didn't have the right personality for him it's that simple. He couldn't provide the emotional stability Diana needed, they were each emotional refugees. He needed Camilla's support and he was unable to give Diana what she needed. It's a mess. Try not to blame people especially as you aren't involved.
I think that any amount of fixing up, that she had plastic surgery, fixing her teeth, help with her wardrobe, that the public will always think of her as the mistress of charles . The woman who charles loved , and broke up his marriage to Princess Diana. Her and charles's affair broke Princess Diana's heart. Now camilla is going to be a Queen. Her cheating got what she wanted, someone rich. So no matter what she is,,people will never really forgive camilla.
Plus no principles or morals - and a leopard can't change its spots Anyone can fool people for a time until their goal is obtained and that's all I believe is happening with C and C here. I am extremely surprised and concerned about the Queen's total turnaround especially - it seems she's thrown concern for the government of the Commonwealth to the wind.
Her time will come as no deed goes unpublished. This must be very hurtful for Diana's boys and worst to be putting on a front in her presence. Charles is extremely selfish so his time will come too... Them being king and queen will tear down all royal standards...it'll be no more... why should taxpayers support that mess?
Why would anybody like a person with the character of an alley cat - in and out of many beds. This is not a good trait for the Queen of England. Personally even Charles with all the recent sleaze of selling titles should be thoroughly checked
The past is the past Diana was no angel we have all done things we are not proud of nobody can say that they have lived a blameless life but some people think they have
I don't like either of them l particularly hate blood sports of any kind it makes me feel sick that a human being could do that and enjoy it and about c d the queen mother and her friend lady fermoy who was related to Diana cooked it up between them and I am sure they had r f help
I don’t believe Charles will be King. The Queen is favouring William. Concerning Andrew she met with William for an hour before she met with him snd Charles… she sought Williams advice over Charles, and has done so more than we realize. She’s treating him like he will be King.. training both him and Cathrine. I don’t believe the church wants Charles as the head of the church because of Camilla… they don’t believe in divorce and both of them have been divorced. The church wants someone stable like William. They want a stable example as head of the church that promotes their values… sadly that’s not Charles and Camilla. I believe Diana’s accident was not an accident… there are those who didn’t want her involved with the kids when Charles became King.. her bodyguards would never have tolerated a drunk driver… sadly I believe her death was planned… they didn’t want her to marry into Dodi’s family… so I honestly don’t think Charles will ascend to the throne because of Camilla.. the Firm needs young blood like William to be able to survive the next generation…. Otherwise George won’t have anything to ascend to. Also with Charles getting Covid again…sad to say this may be the very way William bed King
She will not be the queen of England! Prince Charles has already said that there's only room for one reigning monarch! There are many movie stars who have slept in many beds and that had never been a problem for many men...even Presidents of America. Please explain why some high-class prostitutes are so wealthy and are favourites among men of influence? If you are inclined to deny that, then you should believe that many wealthy married men are faithful to their wives! By the way, what's the number one reason for divorces all over the world? To answer your question: he likes alley-cats, maybe all cats!
After reading all the comments, I came away with why everyone only talks about Diana, Charles and Camilla. We forget that there were the children: William and Harry and the deleterious effect this had on these boys' lives.
The Spencer family wanted her to marry into the royal family , she was to young and he was in love with some one ,she mus t have known , don't think they would have divorced if she had Not gone on the TV ,Which her so called friends push her into , they fill her head with nonsense ,No one was out to get her , after the TV interview The Queen told them to divorce , that was the last thing she wanted , her mental health issues came from her father divorcing her mother ,that cause her a unhappy childhood . Fan of Diana a was shocked that she had a 5 year affair after Harry was born ,when she was still married , I thought it was just Prince Charles . such a lot came out after about different boyfriend s , it was not all one sided after all , but still a big Fan .Harry should let her rest in peace , and Netflix should be a shame ,
@@mags1188 I think there are MANY marriages today with just this scenario playing out unfortunately: one party commits adultery and the innocent party out of hurt, shame and embarrassment (which for Diana was a huge stress and weight on her at a very young age, especially having young children) said "If he can do it so can I". it didn't take the pain away, or the GLOBAL humiliation, shame and embarrassment she was caused, but for what it would have been worth, I think it helped her survive it all and receive just a small recognition that she was human and needed love and affection also. The whole mess was and remains, a total tragedy.
Camilla is a lady who was a mistress, who overstepped her mark. A mistress who did not honour her place outside of Charles and Diana's matrimony. I fear she has covertly won affection and position only for where she may gain. How can such a woman/person ever be trusted?
I have always found that the fault was Charles 's , he married Diana but fell into old habits and took a mistress. How low can you go? Diana made the mistake to go through with the marriage when knowing he had a mistress. She should have cancelled at the eleventh hour , outrage or no outrage.
It’s all about the Institution she may have wanted to do so but the institution prevented her from doing so she might either get the same backlash as Megan if she has done so
Diana found a wedding gift Camilla gave Charles on their wedding day-cuff links with intertwined “C’s” … Diana of course was heartbroken and apparently went to her older sisters who reportedly told her, “it’s too late, your face is already on the tea towels.” So sad, too young. She said walking down the aisle she felt like “a lamb to the slaughter.” Not a great way to start your wedding day & marriage. 😔
Wally Jansen: Charles once told Diana…….he couldn’t go down in history as the only Prince of Wales never to have had a mistress! Well, he didn’t let the side down.
No, Charles is the one who shouldn't have gone ahead with the marriage. He should have abdicated and saved so many the heartache and misery that has resulted. Diana believed he loved her but was simply a 'pawn in the game'.
There never was a break between Charles and Camilla. Hence a bracelet for Camilla when he went on his honeymoon!!! I would have left him to go on his honeymoon with his bitch and have ugly offsprings!!!! How badly it has affected Prince Harry
That's why Charles likes Camilla because of her weirdness. Charles strikes me as a very insecured individual. They belong with each other. As far as I'm concerned they are both weird.
he likes her because he looks good when around her. He cannot look good around a beautiful and kind person. He looks better when he is around ugly and mean people.
@@Maerahn that's true. That was camillas chat up line when she met Charles... it is documented as is the entwined double Cs in the especially made cuff links.
Camilla had a reputation. Charles was like most men...he wanted to have a reputation. Men with reputations have the respect of their fellow men. Women just get called names. 😐 However, she still should have had a bit more respect for Princess Diana.
With the exception of the Queens late husband (to my understanding) all Royal men are expected to have consorts. They're just not supposed to be as obvious as Charles was with Camilla.
@@victoriawilliams2786 A *consort* is the *spouse* of a reigning monarch. Prince Philip was the *Queen's consort.* Camilla was Charles' *mistress,* not his consort. When he becomes king, Camilla, as his wife, will *then* become his consort. That's why she will be given the title "Princess Consort," although Charles wants to give her the title "Queen Consort."
She did NOT love Prince Charles when they were first dating! HELLO?! People just gloss over the part where that manipulative woman ONLY dated Prince Charles to make Andrew jealous! Plus being Catholic she knew Prince Charles could not (at the time) marry her! I also think she feigns interest in SOME things that interest Prince Charles as a means to manipulate him! I realize other women have done so in the past but that does not make it alright!
She is definitely a manipulator and Charles was more than happy to be manipulated by her, and in turn he manipulated Diana, or should I say that Charles and Camilla were a team and manipulated Diana together. If I were Diana's sons, I would only show disgust to both of them.
@@deborahcurtis1385 I think it's more that the commenter recognises the type of behavour and the thought processes behind it - I've known people like this also and I agree with 'hemily54'. Not difficult to recognise at all.
Camila is still weird and everyone will love princess Diana for what she did on this earth and that she was showing love to all kids! It wasn’t fake either.
This woman has a lot to answer for. Charles is also responsible but Camilla made it easy for him to betray Diana. They were both lovers even before Charles married Diana. If she had done the decent thing by respecting the marriage between Diana and Charles, perhaps Diana would still be with us. Camilla is a selfish and destructive woman who indirectly contributed to princes William and Harry losing their mother when they were still children. As a result, the children of Diana's boys never had the chance to know their beautiful. loving and compassionate grandmother.
Human being are selfish, kids will also plan to take others toy if they like it. This type of relationship i had seen it many times. Some successful, some not. In fact mostly successful.
This woman is evil with no respect for other peoples lives. She will come to no good end as Buddhist, her negative karma will surface eventually which she cannot escape.
I totally agree. Camelia should have ended the relationship with Charles when he got married. Her poor husband had to put up with the Prince still sleeping with his wife.
Very sadly not the lady she pretends to be, or the woman Charles wants her to be after spending a fortune trying to make her. Very cold and very planning you can still see in her crumbled face and has little respect for other woman. Almost touching an older Meghan, which I guess is where Charles and Harry as weak as they are, meet. She will never be forgotten as the married bit on the side working her own way into the Royal bed, where two did lay at one time. which also highlights Charles values, in agreeing to dump Diana by orders of the Queen and then have open house for this Camilla thing or effort at being a lady which very sadly for her she is not and far more just Charles's, as mental as he is, comfy blanket or Royal hot water bottle with benefits.
@Dark Yes she is using him...the same way Meghan uses Harry. However neither Charles -nor Harry - mind being used, since they both are getting what they most want from the women they chose.
I remember being in Italy when it all blew up. I went into a ristorante, it had a TV on the wall. The Italians were rolling about laughing.... wondering how chas could prefer camilla over Diana. I felt very uncomfortable at the time I remember.
@@annewalden3795 Diana was 19.. Young and full of life. Loved pop music and fashion/pop stars... Charles was fuddie daddy and reserved. Diana was brood mare. Camilla was horsey and 'experienced' and she mothered him.... it was a marriage made in hell probably for both of them.
@@lorrainebishop3520 Diana was full of the trauma of her childhood and developed mental health problems early in her marriage .I do not know if she received help from therapists but she seemed to be influenced by non medical practitioners which did not do her much good. I think we all wanted a fairy tale with Charles and Diana living happy ever after but instead we got a horror story with Camilla cast as the villain .All very sad and no ones fault just a tragic outcome .
@Jody Campbell Did you hear the part about her wearing pieces of Diana's jewelry that had been gifted to Diana by Charles? I didn't think I could dislike Camilla anymore than I did.
@@dmoffatt8354 I think Diana's personal jewellery was allocated to William and Harry therefore Camilla would have no access to these pieces .Yet another incorrect story which is designed to upset the Diana apologists . The jewellery Camilla wears is normally the property of the Crown and is loaned by the Queen as and when required.
@@annewalden3795 How is it that you missed the part about a necklace Diana wore which was a gift to her by Charles now being worn as a brooch by Camilla? Please miss me with excuses to hide the coldhearted behaviors of Charles and Camilla. Why did Charles retrieve the necklace after Diana's death, instead of letting William and Harry have it? It appears Charles saw her death as his opportunity to take back gifts he had given her.😏
I do not know why I am watching this painful story. Camilla broke so.many hearts besides Dianna's . At least she could have taught Dianna about men.just be an old friend🤔
Nothing will erase what these "Royals" did out of self indulgence... PC and C should step aside in favor of Prince William. There needs to be a fresh start after everything England has been through these past years. Let PC and C enjoy their marriage and their peaceful retirement.... win-win-win
True---in not so many years -- 6 or 7--- Charles will be 80 an age rather old to take on the responsibility of being King !! Time for William and Kate to step in
Oh how I agree, but doesn't Parliament have the decision on who gets the Crown? When in England we were informed that unless Charles were to abdicate, the Crown must go through succession unless by act of Parliament.
Traditionally throughout history, royals were only allowed to marry other royals (the idea of allowing them even to marry the next rung down of aristocrats was essentially an innovation of the 1920s, necessitated by the "shortage of princes" and surplus of princesses due to the casualties of World War One). Therefore, it was very common for a king to be married to a queen whom he had never met before the wedding - chosen for political reasons - who would have children by him, but otherwise live her own life in another part of the palace; while to have have a romantic/social relationship with someone he actually liked the king would take a mistress. It's really only been in the last couple of generations that royals have been able to choose their partners, and therefore don't need mistresses anymore.
...but they still have them! 🎪#abolishthemonarchy 🤡 Interbreeding - the children of 1st cousins, marrying 1st cousins - caused the downfall of European ‘Rule’, so ‘new blood’ was introduced ie: not in the Gotha Directory- yes, it really exists, AKA ‘RentaWomb’, which doesn’t mean they’re not as bonkers as ever; if they were sane, they wouldn’t see the need for this ostentatious circus...a Rolls Royce for a headpiece studded with diamonds - WTF? William’s (“one wants to be like common people: one wants to do what common people do...)embarrassment is sometimes seen, but as long as his wife gets her clothing allowance, she puts on a brave face... Does she have any idea how many of Our Little Lady’s (cold & hungry) loyal ‘subjects’ might be fed for the price of a Philip Treacy hat? 🙏🏻💔🙏🏽
@@brendapowell4795: ‘ordinary people’? Don’t you mean ‘Hobson’s Choice’?- “Use it up wear it out, make it do, do without’ - THAT choice, like in (can I afford/choose where to live: can I afford to feed myself AND my children: can I choose to buy children’s clothes, as long as it’s Primark/Asda (thus worsening working conditions in the 3rd World): can I choose to switch on heating/the oven/ washer/dryer/iron...:can I decide to wear wellies if I have no shoes: can I decide not to invite people over if I have nothing to offer them: can I decide not to attend wedding if I can’t afford a gift: can I decide to walk everywhere to save fuel/fares... Insert as applicable:- 🙏🏻💔🙏🏽
Not knowing the "history" about the Royal children of yesteryear, I give my personal opinion having been raised in a "love triangle myself as a child." Our biological mother left my father for her own secret lover and they got married. Thankfully, my father got custardy of his eldest two children and the younger one stayed with her. Uncertainty prevails in dark clouds as to who fathered the younger brother, but all three of us have similar facial features of our biological mother. No more said in that regard, reservations still exist. To my mind, Prince Charles messed up Princess Diana's life by "secretly still meeting his old flame." Then to top that off, the children born of his legal marriage to Princess Diana, have had their lives messed up as well due to Prince Charles continuing his affair with Camilla and eventually marrying her. Nowhere can any other person ever be considered being fully accepted by children of other parent, than their own. Especially under the circumstances that these two young men lost their beloved mother. It is something that they will carry with them until their life comes to an end.
Désolé pour votre expérience doulereuse. J'espère que ça vous a rendu plus fort que beaucoup d'autres. Aussi, plus sage. Dès foos, les gens d'oublient que, la promesse ä été fait aussi à Dieu, non seulement à l'époux/ épouse. Ceux qui ne veulent pas tenir leur promesse, mieux ne pas se marier dans l'église. Mais, lorsque quelqu'un refuse ce type de marriage, est le signe qu'il/elle n'a pas de respect pour l'autre. Car l'amour sans le respect n'existe point. Crux qui disent qu'ils/elles aiment sans respectent leur chèrie, sont des MENTEURS: comment ils peuvent aimer s'ils disent des gros mots à la personne ou en présence de la persomne aimée?! Ou, plus que ça, comment être possible à battre un autre adult dont on affirme qu'on l'aime?! N'est pas notre enfant qu'on doit, parfois, le punir avec un giffle legère à son dos ( juste pour qu'il se rappel à ne pas repéter la bettise faite). Entre adults devrait être suffisant a parler, argumenter et prendre un peu de recule de quelques heures/ jours afin de faire, chacun, une introspection, dans le but de constater si nous avons tort ou non et se reconcilier. Ceux qui sont adulters, n'aiment pas leurs enfants, pareillement ceux qui disent, après un divorce, qu'il "refaitent leur vie", car ils savent que ça poura détruite la vie de leurs enfants à jamais, surtout quand il sont capable à reflechir ( même s'ils sont des bébé ou moins de 5 ans). Si avant le mariage on se posent le problème ainsi, il n'y aura pas tant de chagrin. On fera des choix plus sages ( mon opinion).
She this boys where to yong to see their mother was very TOXIC woman in her marriage there where not 3 in her marriage she forgot to say 4 people in her marriage her personal security guy si? not innocent or victim at all just VERY TOXIC WOMAN
Charles IMMATURO SENZA SCRUPOLI,SENZA DIGNITÀ INCAPACE DI DISTINGUERE IL BENE DAL MALE PREPOTENTE. .HA CALPESTATO LA VITA DI UNA GIOVANE FANCIULLA LUI VECCHIO ASTUTO VOLEVA I FIGLI DA LEI GIOVANE GENEROSA E SPINGENDOLA NELL'ABBISSO DELLA DISPERAZIONE, UMILIANDOLA X UNA VECCHIA CIABATTA SENZA SCRUPOLI ...ASSETATA DI AGGUANTARE IL TRONO ... CON QUELLA FACCIA INESPRESSIVA È STATO USATO X RAGGIUNGERE I SUOI TRAGUARDI QUELLO CHE DI MALE HA RISERVATO ALLA PRINCIPESSA E AI FIGLI HA FATTO PIANGERE IL MONDO DOVREBBE NASCONDERSI DALLA VERGOGNA MA È TALMENTE LIMITATO E OTTUSO DI CERVELLO CHE RIDE INSIEME ALL'ARPIA IN BARBA AL MONDO SARÀ ANCHE CAPO DELLA CHIESA ANGLICANA..?? ALLORA NN SARÀ PIÙ UNA CHIESA MA UNA CARICATURA DI CHIESA, uno SPERGIURO ALLE NOZZE... CATTIVO ESEMPIO PER TUTTI
I am reminded of a quote by the late Sir James Goldsmith which says "when a man marries his mistress, it creates a job vacancy". Well, the old grey mare ain't what she used to be ... not that she was anything much to begin with!
I recall late night American talk-show host Jay Leno comparing Camilla Parker Bowles appearance - unfavourably - with a horse! But thats a tad unkind: Both Camilla and her beau "Bonny Prince Charlie are well matched indeed. The couple are both death-sports fanatic's, with the Charli and Camilla spending up to five days per week ,terrorising, chasing and tearing apart defenceless small furry creatures - foxes - for entertainment. An environmentalist? Don't make me vomit!
After greeting Diana on the Patterson Skytrain Platform, for Expo 86, I will never accept them both. Diana would of made a wonderful Queen but Charlie had his mistress. 🇨🇦
Hahaha. I wouldn't want to be the poor actor who portrays her. They will have to advertise for old and extremely wrinkled. Ugly on the inside eventually seeps into the outside. Sure did with her face. lol
Yes, it put the almost final nail in that coffin for me also. Charles' failure to remove the titles of H & M and deal appropriately with their defamation and fraudulent conduct was the final!
Now she is the "Adulteress Queen Consort. Things are looking up for her and I'm sure becoming his mistress has been the best thing she ever did for herself. No worries about how her children would cope with a mother everyone hated.
For ''being a flirt''....read easy...as someone close to that circle said...''there were girls who didn't...she was one of the girls who did''...so along the way she learned what men liked...
Morally they most definitely don't. It's just their disgusting 'gloss it over and forget it' mentality that has pushed the monarchy further into the gutter imo.
He should be allowed it. His adoptive parents did work for the late Queen and Philip so... It was a common practice to hide an illegitimate royal child that way, in any countries royal house..
@@juliaforsyth8332 absolutely possible. Genes regress, they have people in the family with brown eyes. My daughter is mixed race, her father and I both have brown eyes. My daughter has my nans green eyes.
@@annesmith6582 he will never get that DNA and its sad. Once hidden things are hard to come to light with this dreadful family. It's all about image and maintaining that false dignified hierarchy.
Well I try to be a Christian but there are some things forgive but her pretending to befriend cheating with friends spouse but the possibility of murder rather than accident I do not know. She help choose Diana as spouse she wanted to be mistress it is too complicated
I think Charles knew he was running out of time to marry and have children. He had been involved with many attractive young ladies but they did not want to be his wife. In Diana he found a girl who had little experience of life but she was pretty and pleasant ; more important she was willing to marry him despite the age gap and lack of common interests. Both parties to the marriage were wildly optimistic about the chances of success and it is sad that they created a disaster for themselves , their families and the Country. A tragic outcome to lose Diana and to leave 2 young boys without a mother.
@@annewalden3795 Charles might have married Diana's older sister, except for her big mouth, talking about marriage to the paparazzi and letting the cat out of the bag too early in their relationship. Charles was aghast and angry, and broke it off. She might have been more suited to Charles than her younger sister was.
Great photo, was this before or after her latest face lift? Charles the Tampon King isn’t fit to be a king. I’m sure they’ve all watched the Crown. Lol
He didn't need to marry Diana then cheat. His uncle Edward married for love and kept his marriage vows sacred. Charles wanted his cake and eat it too. Karma might have something to say about it.
Hello Rosemary, I hope you're safe over there? I hope this year brings happiness, prosperity, and love all over the world, I would love us to be good friends in honesty and in trust if you don't mind. I'm Well Martins Originally from France but I live in Detroit Michigan, where are you from if I may ask?
Camilla was a perfect fit being as morally corrupt as Charles. How manipulative and cruel she was, taking the naive Diana to lunch at the "Ménage à Trois" restaurant when Diana first started dating Charles. Charles was batting above his station with Diana. Her heritage was actual British aristocracy.
I don't believe Diana tried to upstage Charles, it just happened. She was young, pretty and personable to the people something the Royals never did. I remember thinking they were so boring before she came into the family. She livened them up and made them interesting, no fault of her own. They weren't that pretty and here comes beautiful Diana dresses in beautiful and modern clothes who truly loved her children determined their lives would be different than the status quo. Altho I don't like Camilla at all, she seems to make HRH happy; she could never out shine him. LOL
Im old enough to remember history as I lived through it and I’ll never forgive Charles & Camilla for what they did. She has no right to be Queen. Interesting how everyone has forgotten.
Family trees are interesting, aren't they? The blood connection of Elizabeth & Phillip for example. But you have to dig a little deeper to discover the blood link of Camilla & Charles. It is a little closer than the mentioned master/mistress relationship. The royals used to have an interesting way of acknowledging their "bastards", they'd become a godfather to them. I know that this "habit" was still in place in Philip's day. Was it still done in Charles' generation?
@Janette Webster. It would be interesting to know if the man claiming to be Camilla and Charles son has managed to obtain their DNA. I doubt it though sadly.
@@mac4039 he will have to wait until they throw away a milkshake container and get the DNA.. laughing. I hope though someone gets it to him somehow (steal Charles toothbrush say the corgis took off with it).
Sorry to be so catty, but she’s not the most attractive lady…..just sayin. Beyond my cattiness, not fond of this woman bc she made herself available to Charles the whole time he was married to Diana. That said, Charles isn’t much better: if he wanted the other woman, he should have stayed with her and not ruined Diana’s life! They deserve each other, I guess!
What do you think about Camilla Parker Bowles?
I can not stand this women!
She's rough and broke up Diana's family.
Rough Rough Rough
What do i think about camilla. Not a lot after what they did to diana
Diana actually broke her own heart Prince Charles didn't love her she thought she could change that with all her love in her heart. But they produced William and Harry so that's what the family wanted. A fantastic blood line. RIP Princess Diana 👸
Take her with a grain of salt
I think if she’d have kept her legs closed that maybe Charles and Diana would’ve had a better chance at making it a go with their marriage . But Cowmilla just couldn’t give him up and Charles was the same way . But I feel like that if Cowmilla would’ve stayed away and told Charles NO then he would’ve . And maybe in time he could’ve loved Diana .
I think the commentator said it best: "...if Camilla and Charles were allowed to marry from the start, then Andrew Bowles and Diana Spenser would have been spared divorces" ... and could both be married to spouses who not only appreciated them, but they could have led a life of peace and quiet instead of upheaval, chaos and misery. Diana might also still be very much alive OR lived longer than she did.
Diana was supposed to marry Andy. maybe a better match
I so agree
He used Dianna to have children they needed a young lady to ensure they were healthy as history shows if any disability they’d say they died but they were put in asylums in America they are disgusting
camilla was considered not suitable for royalty, they werent wrong how could charles prefer her to diana.... god only knows
But then Diana's story wouldn't have happened. No people's princess, no Prince William. Or Prince George, for that matter. Sigh. People only see what they want to see.
Everytime I see her, I am reminded of Diana's unhappiness..
Me too!
This thing/woman is a home wrecker!!! Disgusting thing
I also remember how she hurt Diana
Don't forget Diana did it to herself. She just wanted to marry the Prince of Wales not Charles she said so.
@@annm.7176 You dont think Camilla is doing it for the same reason..?
Most likely Princess Diana would still be alive if not for this relationship. I feel for Diana’s sons.
True 😢
Exactly.
@@shawroberts5149 very suspicious with all those cameras no one captrures the crash , yeah because it was deliberate to kill her.
I 100% believe that to be true 😪
What I think makes not a jot of difference to the way things are.
Can't stand her at any price or Charles. Both of them have hides as thick as rhinoceros skin. The whole concept of an over privileged family is distasteful when so many hard working people in UK are having to use food banks. Only two in that family I have any time for are Anne and Harry albeit for different reasons.
After her vile and heartless comment to Diana when she found out Camilla was having an affair with Charles, I’ve hated the woman ever since!
When Diana confronted Camilla it was 1989 and Diana was having an affair with James Hewitt. She had been shagging him for 3 years. And before that she had an affair with her married Bodyguard Barry Mannake in 1985/86.
Camilla knew about Hewitt! Charles used to let Diana and Hewitt stay at Highrove with the boys!
These were important little details that Diana left out when she was regaling her story about confronting Camilla.
Me, too.
I hope she goes away.
Legally....
Coming from a broken home, times over, I will never respect her or Charles.
yes! My words.
I HAVE NO RESPECT FOR THOSE TWO.
@@feliciapetrovich1081 Me either.
She's that kind of female. The ones that destroys family's.
Diana also had affairs with married men…how do you feel about her?
Sadly the Royal Family made so many lives miserable because of their silly rules. Had it not been for them Diana would probably have lived a obscure upper class life, raising children she could have cherished for a much longer time than she got to be with her beloved William and Harry.
So why didn't she bugger off and do that.
@@streaming5332 Once she realized what she had gotten herself into do you think that they would have let her have her children, which were what she adored the most?
@Sapphire Sea Do you realize just how many times the Monarchy of England has changed hands and families? The institution may be old but with every change of family, the rules change. They are a family that up until now has been filled with incest which produced generations of hemophilia and other maladies. Sometimes tradition can be a curse. The Queen has brought a lot of people misery because of her relentless rules. She made her sister miserable, she made her son miserable, at times she made her husband feel less than a man. The Queen was well aware of Charles’s affair with Camilla, she didn’t stop it, even though she knew it was tearing his marriage apart. I believe that makes her a hypocrite.
@Sapphire Sea If she has no choice in matters, then what is the point of all of this ridiculousness?
@Sapphire Sea In actually she rules absolutely nothing.
They need to skip Charles altogether and make William the King and Katherine the Queen.
Too late for that...two lukewarm cups of tea on the throne
Charles also made a comment right after Queen died that he intends to ride out being the King until he dies. He said blah, blah he’ll follow mummy’s footsteps for however long he has left. So I don’t think he plans a few short years and out. I’m afraid William will be the doddering old 70 something by the time he gets there. They are just too damn healthy these days.
I think somethings going to happen, & William will become King!
Charles has more experience, for the time being , plus William and Kate are too busy with other projects very useful ones. Theh also have 3 young children and Kate wants to be a real attentive mum.1
I totally agree with you! Dumbass Charles AND old hag Camilla should be banished from the kingdom!
I can't believe how the Royal Family accepting & promoting Camillia through the years, a devious, calculating home breaker, but the sweet, vivacious, fun & energetic Princess Diana was put down by the Queen & family during her marriage to Charles. They were vicious to Diana & the emotional hurt she was going through with her husband cheating on her the whole time with Camillia, was considered "weak" by the Queen & family. People forget how cruel the Queen was to Diana, not making a tribute to Diana after she died for a couple of weeks. Until she was criticized by the British people, then she paid a tribute to her. Howecsoon we forget. It discusses me to see her called " Queen Consort. She doesn't deserve that title & she sure hasn't earned it.
the correct title for Diana was not Princess Diana ... it was Diana, Princess of Wales as she was married to the Prince of Wales ... Camilla is Princess of Wales but she does not use that title, she has several from which to choose & she will be Queen Camilla ...
@@anneroy4560 Well, Ta De Dah!
I'd say that Camilla has earned her title. Why scapegoat her? Diana was too self-centered to keep her husband's love.
@@bnic9471 You are so wrong, Diana was too self-centered to keep her husband's love. In what way was she too self-centered? loo at all her charity work she did, for people that had aids, just one of the many things she did in the publics eye. We the British loved Diana and always will, and we will never in our hearts for get Diana or forgive Camila and Cheating husband Charles. what they did to Diana.
@@bnic9471 I don't think Diana was a saint, but looks at what Charles and Camilla did to her. Camila was the selfish one. What is Diana self centred about? Your view is very skewed.
‘I’m afraid to me she’ll always be an adulterous, she should have left them alone and I’m sure they would have been happy.She caused Diana so much misery and unhappiness.
Camilla had to be jealous of Diana's beauty absolutely. And jealous of the way everybody outside of the senior family loved Diana. People say it was like Prince Charles was the frog prince who did not change back but Camilla is like a frog too, so they go well together.
Actually she’s a very kind and lovely lady. You think Diana didn’t have affairs? She did.
I strong agree
@@actual_doge3221 I agree
@@actual_doge3221 how rude you are. You don’t know anything about these people. Why on Earth would Camilla be jealous of Diana? You’re just assuming that. Looks aren’t everything you know.
If prince Charles dies before her and I was William I'd get rid of her as soon as possible they had no say when Charles married his mistress who hurt their mother
I'm sure he will.
There were 2 in that relationship.
I think William is bigger than that. He’s doesnt seem to be a spiteful person.
I'm sure the two boys, now young men, will act civilly as grown adults. Camila has problems of her own. The UK people will have to deal with her in some way. It will be interesting to see how history plays out.
@@LocustIvy
Only spiteful with Harry & Meghan.
I can’t get over how the former mistress became a queen of England
Mistress are winning .this is goals for mistress's.its just like a stripper marrying a basketball player etc..u just don't kno wen wen u will hit the jackpot
Queen Consort she doesnt even deserve consort she deservers jail
Very sad
Did Charles great uncle step down bc he wanted to be married to a divorce???
Camilla was always Charle's only love. The crown forced him into "settling" for Diana -- it was essentially an arranged marriage. Both Diana and Charles were victims.
She will forever be remembered as Diana’s downfall and unhappiness; how Charles could choose her over Diana is just unthinkable
The Secret Service should have warned her to stay far away from the Prince of Wales, as it was obvious to all, she was trouble, big time trouble maker, wrecking a Royal Marriage. .
He didnt choose her
Love choose her. You have to watch. You could. Fall in love with the wrong kind of person. You could fall in love with a fat person or a augry person or a bad person. Cause love makes the choose.
All these comments are hilarious 😂. You know that Camilla was not the only person involved in this relationship?
@@karenmazur3019 Fat...Angry...Bad WOW! Good to know that you equate fat with such negativity in regards to the overall value of a person.
Charles and Camilla fell in love when they were in their twenties.
She seems to age faster than the queen
Camilla is a year and a bit older than Charles - she was 75 this summer 2022.
Yes when one's EVIL one ages UGLY!
DRAGON GREMLIN.
Yep...evil doings does that.
@@tashasmal9364 what nonsense 😂😂😂
It disgusts me when women do this to other women!! You don’t comment on the mens’ appearances!!😡😡. THIS is why men run the world. Women are too busy tearing each other down rather than supporting. 😡
Well, you have to admit, Charles has a Queen that can't upstage him anymore 🙄.
True.
True! He was very jealous of Diana because she was more popular than he was. He always loved the horse face. He never loved Diana and fulfilled his duty to produce an heir and a spare. Diana was used!! Did you see the look on Diana's face when Charles said, "Whatever love means'? I think she wondered then what she had gotten herself into. She had her reservations about marrying him.
What Charles ever sees in that ugly thing is beyond me.
That’s what Charles needed…someone who is so unattractive, he’ll always look better than he does. Camilla had a “reputation” from an early age… she’s an immoral, lying cheater. She’ll make a perfect queen for a dying institution. Charles has put the nail in the monarch’s coffin.
For certain Camilla looks like Thomas Jefferson.
and happy.
One thing people can learn about the 2 women is how an experienced woman can bully and destroy a naiive woman.
been there ... it hurts
PC is a weak man!!!!!!
How true
you hit the nail on the head 💯
@@debbiepalmer6024 🙂🤛👏
Camilla is simply disgusting to have ruined a family, she could have kept away once Charles was married and became a father, it's a big SIN committed on her side
Yes it was a big sin what this woman did. And she will answer to our Lord Jesus Christ. Diana is an angel in heaven she should have not be dead she should be alive and enjoying her family she will forever be a queen to everybody around the world she was loved more than anybody I could think of we miss her we love her she's beautiful always will be may God bless you forever in Paradise Diana
I do believe Chales pursued her. The Coward could have married against the queens wishes (witch) and save Diana his ridicule. Pompous ass that he is; he deliberately abuse Diana and gaslighted her with Camilla. It has to be the desire for the crown that wove such a disgusting mess. The man has all the charm, looks and nobility of a Basset Hound.
@@cynthiamurillo7548, You may want to dial back your judgement. Charles bears the majority of the blame here, and has much to answer for, for his choices. If only he kept his wandering gaze averted, and his zipper locked. She didn't exactly trap him.
On both their sides;
It takes two for an affair!
what about the familys Diana broke with her multiple (not only one) extra-conjugal affairs?
Ultimately, a grown man, 13 years senior to a barely 19 year old girl, who was simply too young and inexperienced to have developed her own personal foundation as an adult person, and apparently believing in social myths that young girls do…married her “Prince Charming”, only to find herself married to Charles…he is the one responsible for the pain his young wife experienced, Parker-Bowles was simply his actual “wife”. Diana was his brood mare. She came from an Aristocratic background, but wasn’t prepared for the role she had been relegated to from the beginning with Charles. She wanted to be loved by her husband, whom she didn’t really know, or have much in common with as a basis to build an actual relationship upon. That being said, he broke any chance of the marriage succeeding with his Camilla relationship, and his own rather narcissistic sense of privilege and entitlement. He seems to be far more like his Hanoverian ancestors than as a poster child for the Windsors. Well he will be King. The Brits and the Commonwealth will just have to live with it.
Yes ....looks like it.
If Diana was a year younger when Charlie wed her ,, He would have been equa; to Andrew mmmmmmm
Diana wasn't too young or inexperienced; she was a genuine young woman who upstaged the entire family. And, considering that Charles was a chauvinistic jerk, he wasn't about to tolerate that! Diana had a lot of smarts, but wasn't allowed to use them.
@@susanmetz9892 the guy was an Earl. As an Earl, a member of the Peerage, just what do you think he would say to HRH The Prince of Wales when asked for his daughter’s hand in marriage. One of his three daughters he had turned over to Nannies, Servants and Governesses to actually raise. The man’s wife was the daughter of a romance novelist who hadn’t much use for her stepdaughters. And having been cut off from her mother by the Earl, the Grandmother, and Brit Courts, just who do you think the girl could turn to for non-biased advice? She had no one, really like in her corner
UNFORTUNATELY!
Camilla Parker Bowles to wear the crown of the Queen is a huge slap on Princes William and Harry.
The crown will go to William. Not Charles. She will never wear the crown.
@@argarman09 ummmmmm
@@tarajohnson4686 yeah I read the wrong thing, my bad. It's sickening isn't it, that she'll be called queen consort
@@argarman09 I believe she's next in line Charles and her she's going to be wearing that Crown which I think is a bunch of Bologna
@@elizabethmiranda7867 yeah she is. I read somewhere that she wouldn't but I was misinformed. Sickens me to have her wear that crown
I still can't accept what they did to lovely Diana!
But, can you accept what Diana did to him? She wanted to elope with her bodyguard very soon in the marriage! Instead of learning to ride horses, she was giving rides to Captain Hewitt, the Pakistani surgeon, Dodi....!
@@dwiggi3rd504 , well this is new information. I hope that it's not true.If it is true ,I will no longer admire him. I would be very disappointed!
@@dwiggi3rd504 What evidence have you to support your statement?
@@dwiggi3rd504 what a load of tosh! 😂😂
@@dwiggi3rd504 She could have taken the trouble to learn who he was instead of seeking a fantasy figure. No rewal person would have satisfied her infantile need.
What the two of them did will never go away. Some people will accept it, others will not. That she will always be a constant reminder. Of a woman who was run down by the paparazzi And how she inserted herself into this woman's life until she got what she wanted. She got her man, and her competition is pushing up daisies. In my humble opinion, they should have skipped The two of them since they are so Scandalous And moved on to Diane's son Will and his wife. After all, this is the same thing that happened to Queen Elizabeth's uncle. they replaced him after he Gave up his crown to be with this woman.
TOTALLY agree. And unlike H&M, the uncle and his wife respected the RF and caused no drama at all when he abdicated. They went away and lived their lives out in comparative silence: praying H&M take the hint.
The whole world loves Williams and Kate they are a good example of their grandparents Queen Elizabeth and Philip.The people of England should abdicate Charles and Don't you think it is very disgraceful for the whole world that this sinful pair were to ruled England I think the whole hate her during the Queen funeral Charles was asked by the public why should the public pay for the100 million £ they don't feel disgrace and still wanted the throne that is all about selfishness and greediness.
How. Could Charles have made his mistress a queen, , when the whole country detested her for wrecking a marriage with no thought of the two young children involved
This whole mess gets even worst, it destroyed an entire family. Now in 2022 Lady Di beautiful sons, are at odds. This whole situation, is aweful, only pure prayers could create a difference and peace. I don't approve of this woman period. You don't steal husbands and be honored for breaking up a family. The boys are still hurting.
Hello Rose ,how are you doing ?its nice meeting you ,well am new just ,don't know if we can be friends so we can get to know ourselves more better what do you think about that ?
Agree. The sight of her next to Charles instead of Diana is sickening. What a couple. He an adulterer and she a home wrecker. Given all of this ugliness, if he had any decency he would have abdicated and let William be King. Long live the memory of beautiful Diana!
Well said... I cannot believe Camilla is Queen, that's lost all the dignity of the royals.
@@happygrandma2732 Yes, it's truly disgusting. I can't support the RF now - every sight of these two sitting side by side in such an important, vital position, is sickening to me also. I don't see the monarchy lasting much longer.
Everyone seems to have forgotten the universal, eternal rule that cannot be averted: we reap what we sow, sooner or later.
Charles and camilla loving each other isn’t the issue, I done think most people actually give a damn, the issue is of how many people they have hurt and used over the years
They have behaviour in a disgusting way towards to both their previous partners and hurt their children
If they loved each other so much then Charles should have had the balls to step aside (like his great uncle did)
The queen had other sons not they they are any better but the monarchy would have continued
The truth that most try to simply cover up but which can't be simply 'moved on from' is that the CHARACTER of Charles was fully revealed to the world, and that disgrace can never be fully erased, just as the adultery of Bill Clinton will never be erased. Who would ever trust a king who acted in the morally weak way he did - can we really believe he could be trusted to rule responsibly and fairly when he had such reckless attitude towards such an important role, and especially towards his own WIFE and children? He should have not married Diana but gone to his girlfriend and abdicated from any chance of becoming king. That would have at least been honest! Unfortunately there are very many people today who want to get whatever they 'feel entitled to' in this life, no matter who else they may harm or crush, or even unfortunately kill, in the process - and that, although we may not believe it, will eventually bring their downfall.
Very surprised and disappointed the Queen hasn't taken very needed steps to ensure the Crown will be secure. It seems to me the UK will be under threat of destruction once Charles takes the reins. He's weak & will go along with all other politicians rather than stand for what's good for England & the Commonwealth.
Excately
Not to mention, Princess Anne is well suited to the roll.
@@inlovewithhealth Anne would make a great Queen.
There is no one uglier than Charles & Camilla. They deserve each other.
Inside and out
Yes o
Amen!!!!
But they don't deserve the crown!
man " IT IS THE FACT !!👺👺👺👺
I am pretty sure the affair was public knowledge already. A flirt, she is a home wrecking Trollop. A liar and user. All the while pretending to be Dianna's friend. How cute, she followed in her grand mother's foot steps as a mistress. What I would like to know, is did these two ever as much as apologize to Dianna and William and Harry? When you cheat on your spouse, you're cheating on your whole family. Quality time that you could have, should have spent with young children. Especially with the amount of traveling the royals do. I am sure that no one is going to lose any sleep over my opinion but I cannot respect or trust either one of them.
It totally irked me watching the hypocrite walk behind her coffin.
She hurt a lot of people who got in the way of her selfishness!!! The 2 sons of the queen are no real prizes with their morally bankrupt behavior. Will never be able to see them in a positive light. Can't believe how people grovel at their feet!!!
True. Public adultery in this worst kind...for a King? Absolutely no. Head of Church! No morals at all. We DNT want an Antichrist system. But renew European virtues. Dnt get me wrong. Of course I don't compare them to any kind of Antichrist. But it s just wrong in many ways! Also for Diana s sons! I don't think, they ever could be happy of such title. NO! And it dsnt have anything to do with, if I like her or not. It's morally wrongful! I'm a Christian and Europe is STILL CHRISTIAN! RENEW your virtues ...folks! In this spiritual warfare you CNT adjust to Immorality! God hates it! Get a new soul n ❤! She can be named another title. Much lower. Out of respect for Diana. Her boys. And morality itself. Not to mention for the Head of Church establishment. If tht comes true...the downfall of Europe and the West will be faster. Nobody can want that! Renew your virtues and think and finally become more spiritual again. Traditional...or it s the end of the West...
Two sons? Who are you leaving out?
I agree and Camilla has no love story because she loved Parker Bowls and bewitched Charle's to come after her she is a Witch
@@melaniemaniscalco2060 Edward is a fine human. Andrew is evil and sick, and Charles is very complicated
Dtarla Baucum oh stop Will and Harry have movd on so should you Andrew Parker Bowles also after his dvorce he married his mistress he had while married to Camilla Diana would be over it she had more to look to in her life she was making pece in her life when she was taken from us
I would be outraged if my Father was responsible for my Mother’s extreme pain!!! William and Harry should show total discuss for this woman!!! I have come to believe that this is totally acceptable to the Royal Family. I have lost considerable mount of respect for the British Crown!!!! My mom was a Brit and I don’t think she would appreciate what the royal family is doing. Just food for thought.
@John Smith Are you saying Camilla Parker Bowles is illiterate and discussing?
@@Bdermady, He's pointing out that you have stated "discuss" instead of "disgust"; and also you have stated, "mount" instead of "amount". His question mark after illiterate was a reference to YOU!
@@reynoldgooding7626 My dictation is not very good. Will check out my post before I send. Sorry
@@Bdermady , No problem! We all suffer from that. Good night!
AMEN & AMEN to Beverly
I love these celebrities who are "committed" to environmentalism but jet around in private planes and live in mega-mansions. Rules are for the peasants.
Same hypocrisy here in US
Yes, entitled people find it easy to dictate to others various restrictions while placing none on themselves.
They do not NEED to be 'working royals'...the world would not fall apart without them having to open every engagement, social event, give speeches, be seen to care for the commoners etc
Real royalty are the people who work for the masses. I think people should be in positions of royalty because they earned it. Princess Anne seems more fitting to be the ruler of the UK and not her brother Charles. She actually looks likes she'd serve the people and would be worthy of being treated like royalty.
@@kgosigadijoy I agree princess Anne would make a great queen. Charles has already been a little rude! He will have to eat what him and Camilla cooked up. People don't forget, if he's resentful because people don't like the rottweiler, he needs to step down. I couldn't even watch the service because they would show that rottweiler, can't stomach her. Still think he should have abdicated and handed it over to William and Kate or Princess Anne.
Camilla's father, Bruce Shand, was a British army officer and war hero, and her mother, born Rosalind Cubitt, was the granddaughter of Alice Keppel, the famed mistress of King Edward VII. Seems to run in the family.
Family of mistresses
Huh, mistress to a powerful man, what if the poor woman never had a choice. Please blame the man not the woman for it.
Huh, mistress to a powerful man, what if the poor woman never had a choice. Please blame the man not the woman for it.
@@bluerobin8743 give me a break, she had a choice. It’s called talk to her husband, or move… or say no. Or go to the media, and tell the public, file charges many things she could have done, she continued to call him all the time, she made the cuff links and delivered to him on the day of his wedding. They are BOTH equally at fault, and they could not care less who they hurt!
I was talking about your rude and snide comment about her ancestor. The King is never at fault for having mistresses only women are at fault. British people have a thinking as backward as tribals residing in forests. This entire saga proves it. For everything blame the woman, her dead ancestors but never the powerful Kings who played with people's lives for fun. I couldn't care less for all this prudishness.
THEY SAY THAT BEAUTY IS ONLY SKIN DEEP BUT UGLY GOES ALL THE WAY TO THE BONE.
HOW TRUE !
Second the Motion.
All in Favour. ?
Rude.
Yep totally agree ....... and we can't see your boat race, but your ugliness shines through In your comment of spite and malice 😉......you could preen yourself to within an inch of your life and you will still be mutton dressed as lamb.
Camilla herself was pretty good looking when she was young though.
I'd hate to see Charles and Camilla's bones. UGLY!
A family line of mistresses!
Most of the Commonwealth are not very happy about her either!
And that's just putting it politely!
Not something to be proud of.
@@sybilreid9601
Glad to hear the people in the Commonwealth countries are not guillable about who she truly is.
But, who knows one little visit from him & her to the Commonwealth countries and the leaders and people may very well roll out the red carpets, curtsy to her & him then feast with him & her in a style fit for a king & queen.
@@dmoffatt8354 That's your opinion dear! Being an Austrlian, I am
A PROUD OF This country,
Yes and I have much LOYAL
ADMIRATION for OUR STOIC
QUEEN!! SHE IS AN INSPIRATION
❤🧡💛 She needs ALL of The COUNTRIES she GOVERNS!
NOT ONLY ENGLAND!
Don't take this the wrong way!
Or get upperty.
Just let's All get behind HER!!❤
@@sybilreid9601
Forgetful aren't you?
I responded to your comment saying, "Most of the Commonwealth are not very happy about her either!
And that's just putting it politely!" I presumed you were referring to Camilla, not QEII.
She has more lines on her face than London Underground .
so? she is in early 70s ... no plastic surgery ...
We all get old. So what?
@@bnic9471 Cheating on a married man, will always be called cheating
😂😂😂😂
I Hate what she DID to the Innocent Diana !
It was a game to Camilla, and a detestable one at that.
I cannot accept her as queen when it happens. Diana was a beautiful soul and didn’t deserve to be treated like that.
She won’t ever be Queen. It’s already been announced that Camilla will be known as Queen Consort. That’s very different.
Diana was also having an affair before Harry was born with her riding instructor, bear in mind she was no shrinking violet and after Harry, she also had affairs, people wake up, she used the Royal Family too!!
@@anny1_232 she is Queen now
@@anny1_232 Doesn't seem to be turning out that way. I guess with the Queen gone it's a matter of what Charles wants, he gets! Perhaps he has more in common with Ms Markle than we realised.
@@goldenautumn3073 yes, I agree there seem to have been some changes. Charles is ok, he’s a good man and will make some much needed updates to the monarchy. And he’s far happier now than he ever was with Diana. They just weren’t suited and it was a tragedy for both of them.
It’s been reported that the Queen said she never wants that woman in her vicinity. Well that didn’t last that long, did it?
isunami82 Oueen knows at her age that holding a grudge too long is not good for the brain or the heart Diana if she were alive today would be in a different place in her life as well focused on her causes and her children and grands and maybe her and Charlie could be on nice terms as we get older we learn old grudges are not important our eternal peace is
It's amazing how much a mother will put up with to appease her children. I believe Camilla has proven herself to be a decent person. I used to be so angry at her over Diana but finally opened my eyes and realized Diana wasn't the saint I had believed. Diana was human. Like all of us. She and Prince Chucky should never have been married.
because Charles makes threats
I doubt it was the Queen most like Prince Phillip or Queen mother. I think the Queen left the family to Phillip
@@susanmetz9892 the Queen said that after Diana and Charlie split
I think Diana was well aware of what was going on between Camilla and Charles well before the wedding day. I wish she had walked
I agree
She was an innocent 19 year old
We all do.....so sad. 😟
Yes , but way didn't she
...And Diana would probably be alive today.
The fact that she cheated on her husband with CHARLES is pretty stinking weird, all in itself. 🤢🤮
Yes, they are two birds of a feather, no doubt at all.
And how come nobody mentions her hen pecked ex husband?
Andrew P-B was a serial cheater. Diana was as well. Camilla and Charles just seemed to like each other.
@@judytreischl6899 There are none so blind as those who just won't see.
Diana had an affair for five years with James Hewitt while married to Charles ...
They had it all worked out and broke Diane's heart shame on them
Im sorry but yes she was heartbroken but Princess Diana was not a saint either
Oh Gos. Diana cheated too.
@@totesgene yep at least 7 times, including the ginger haired Mark Dyer. It's not a secret here, but the USA seem to still think the tabloids propaganda, it was those in the press who killed her.
Charles was faithful until the separation and his first relationship was with Jemima Khan
If Diana's heart was broken, it was broken a long, long time before Charles took up with Camilla again. Diana knew well before she married Charles that he didn't love her, so she should have been reconciled to that, and yet she married him anyway--she could hardly have backed out, and there was all that wealth and position to be had.
@@viktoriaironpride4977 I can understand her when I was her age. Now at 51, I’d love to marry someone with immense wealth who wanted nothing to do with me. She didn’t know at her young age that 20+ years later she’d have it all.
A LEGACY OF MISTRESSES! SOME LEGACY TO BRING TO THE BRITISH THRONE!
My heart goes out to Britain. I hope to God that the throne is taken by somebody actually worthy of such a position.
Traditionally throughout history, European royals were only allowed to marry other royals (the idea of allowing them even to marry the next rung down of aristocrats was essentially an innovation of the 1920s, necessitated by the "shortage of princes" and surplus of princesses due to the casualties of World War One). Therefore, it was very common for a king to be married to a queen whom he had never met before the wedding - chosen for political reasons - who would have children by him, but otherwise live her own life in another part of the palace; while to have have a romantic/social relationship with someone he actually liked the king would take a mistress. It's really only been in the last couple of generations that royals have been able to choose their partners, and therefore don't need mistresses anymore.
@@mac4039 and pay for
@@monikorasort : sorry, but I can´t understand, why Britain needs any thrones at all ....for what? For those old reptile aristocrats? There are all bloody bastards, in my opinion 🧐😕😨
Hello Judy ,how are you doing ?its nice meeting you ,well am new just ,don't know if we can be friends so we can get to know ourselves more better what do you think about that ?
She was wholly responsible for the failure of Diana & Charles's marriage. She could have severed ALL ties with him and given his marriage a chance. The fact that she had the brass neck to be with him the night before his wedding just proves that she had absolutely NO intention of letting their relationship end!.
What he sees in her, I really don't know. She smokes like a chimney as her wrinkled face shows! Diana was beautiful, both inside and out. I hope this marriage wrecker NEVER becomes Queen! 🤬 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
Diana was a wonderful beautiful woman. She was kind to everyone and loved her boys passionately. Charles should have been a better man. This is all his fault if you ask me. no one did ask but I'll say it anyway. Camilla should be ashamed to show her face! And to wear Diana's jewelry! I loved princess Diana so much. She was a beautiful woman inside and out
I feel the English people will NEVER allow this.
Should charlie try to see that through will be the end of the monarchy.
there WILL be riots as have NEVER been seen before.
bitch WILL have to leave pommy land
Don't you think that is also Charles fault? LOL
Camilla got her nose so high up in the air, she got a double chin at the back of her neck. !
Rubbish. The marriage was ill fated but I believe Charles was trying to make it work. They were just too different, and he was in love with Camilla, and trying not to be, and trying to do the right thing, and it not working out. Diana just didn't have the right personality for him it's that simple. He couldn't provide the emotional stability Diana needed, they were each emotional refugees. He needed Camilla's support and he was unable to give Diana what she needed. It's a mess. Try not to blame people especially as you aren't involved.
I think that any amount of fixing up, that she had plastic surgery, fixing her teeth, help with her wardrobe, that the public will always think of her as the mistress of charles . The woman who charles loved , and broke up his marriage to Princess Diana. Her and charles's affair broke Princess Diana's heart. Now camilla is going to be a Queen. Her cheating got what she wanted, someone rich. So no matter what she is,,people will never really forgive camilla.
You can't ever accept something as being lamb once you find it's mutton underneath.
The fact that she was willing to be a mistress tells us all we need to know. No class.
Plus no principles or morals - and a leopard can't change its spots
Anyone can fool people for a time until their goal is obtained and that's all I believe is happening with C and C here. I am extremely surprised and concerned about the Queen's total turnaround especially - it seems she's thrown concern for the government of the Commonwealth to the wind.
I agree completely
Her time will come as no deed goes unpublished. This must be very hurtful for Diana's boys and worst to be putting on a front in her presence. Charles is extremely selfish so his time will come too...
Them being king and queen will tear down all royal standards...it'll be no more... why should taxpayers support that mess?
Unpunished
It runs in the family. Shameless!!!
Why would anybody like a person with the character of an alley cat - in and out of many beds. This is not a good trait for the Queen of England. Personally even Charles with all the recent sleaze of selling titles should be thoroughly checked
Sounds like Diana.
The past is the past Diana was no angel we have all done things we are not proud of nobody can say that they have lived a blameless life but some people think they have
I don't like either of them l particularly hate blood sports of any kind it makes me feel sick that a human being could do that and enjoy it and about c d the queen mother and her friend lady fermoy who was related to Diana cooked it up between them and I am sure they had r f help
I don’t believe Charles will be King. The Queen is favouring William. Concerning Andrew she met with William for an hour before she met with him snd Charles… she sought Williams advice over Charles, and has done so more than we realize.
She’s treating him like he will be King.. training both him and Cathrine.
I don’t believe the church wants Charles as the head of the church because of Camilla… they don’t believe in divorce and both of them have been divorced. The church wants someone stable like William. They want a stable example as head of the church that promotes their values… sadly that’s not Charles and Camilla.
I believe Diana’s accident was not an accident… there are those who didn’t want her involved with the kids when Charles became King.. her bodyguards would never have tolerated a drunk driver… sadly I believe her death was planned… they didn’t want her to marry into Dodi’s family… so I honestly don’t think Charles will ascend to the throne because of Camilla.. the Firm needs young blood like William to be able to survive the next generation…. Otherwise George won’t have anything to ascend to.
Also with Charles getting Covid again…sad to say this may be the very way William bed King
She will not be the queen of England! Prince Charles has already said that there's only room for one reigning monarch! There are many movie stars who have slept in many beds and that had never been a problem for many men...even Presidents of America. Please explain why some high-class prostitutes are so wealthy and are favourites among men of influence? If you are inclined to deny that, then you should believe that many wealthy married men are faithful to their wives! By the way, what's the number one reason for divorces all over the world? To answer your question: he likes alley-cats, maybe all cats!
After reading all the comments, I came away with why everyone only talks about Diana, Charles and Camilla. We forget that there were the children: William and Harry and the deleterious effect this had on these boys' lives.
The Spencer family wanted her to marry into the royal family , she was to young and he was in love with some one ,she mus t have known , don't think they would have divorced if she had Not gone on the TV ,Which her so called friends push her into , they fill her head with nonsense ,No one was out to get her , after the TV interview The Queen told them to divorce , that was the last thing she wanted , her mental health issues came from her father divorcing her mother ,that cause her a unhappy childhood . Fan of Diana a was shocked that she had a 5 year affair after Harry was born ,when she was still married , I thought it was just Prince Charles . such a lot came out after about different boyfriend s , it was not all one sided after all , but still a big Fan .Harry should let her rest in peace , and Netflix should be a shame ,
Absolutely, I’ve been more concerned about the two boys than any of those ridiculous adults.
No, haven't forgotten at all. They're part of the reason for us totally disapproving of CPB!
@@mags1188 I think there are MANY marriages today with just this scenario playing out unfortunately: one party commits adultery and the innocent party out of hurt, shame and embarrassment (which for Diana was a huge stress and weight on her at a very young age, especially having young children) said "If he can do it so can I". it didn't take the pain away, or the GLOBAL humiliation, shame and embarrassment she was caused, but for what it would have been worth, I think it helped her survive it all and receive just a small recognition that she was human and needed love and affection also. The whole mess was and remains, a total tragedy.
@ZelimirkaLevi Hee hee! At least you have a sense of humour!
Camilla is a lady who was a mistress, who overstepped her mark. A mistress who did not honour her place outside of Charles and Diana's matrimony. I fear she has covertly won affection and position only for where she may gain. How can such a woman/person ever be trusted?
I have always found that the fault was Charles 's , he married Diana but fell into old habits and took a mistress. How low can you go? Diana made the mistake to go through with the marriage when knowing he had a mistress. She should have cancelled at the eleventh hour , outrage or no outrage.
It’s all about the Institution she may have wanted to do so but the institution prevented her from doing so she might either get the same backlash as Megan if she has done so
Diana found a wedding gift Camilla gave Charles on their wedding day-cuff links with intertwined “C’s” … Diana of course was heartbroken and apparently went to her older sisters who reportedly told her, “it’s too late, your face is already on the tea towels.” So sad, too young. She said walking down the aisle she felt like “a lamb to the slaughter.” Not a great way to start your wedding day & marriage. 😔
Wally Jansen: Charles once told Diana…….he couldn’t go down in history as the only Prince of Wales never to have had a mistress! Well, he didn’t let the side down.
No, Charles is the one who shouldn't have gone ahead with the marriage. He should have abdicated and saved so many the heartache and misery that has resulted. Diana believed he loved her but was simply a 'pawn in the game'.
There never was a break between Charles and Camilla. Hence a bracelet for Camilla when he went on his honeymoon!!! I would have left him to go on his honeymoon with his bitch and have ugly offsprings!!!! How badly it has affected Prince Harry
Camilla: Because every fairy tale needs an evil step-mother. 😈
Oh yeh didn't think that way she is a Witch stepmother but she a divorcee with another man's children
Yes I think Camilla has had a tough time of it. It's ancient history now and she deserves a break.
she reminds me always of the CENDRILLA's mother in law !! so evil so ugly .....🤮🤢👿😈
Exactly!
UK has a apt King.. Symbol of their sins during colonialism.. Drain out everything and dispose. And act like great and nothing had happened.
That's why Charles likes Camilla because of her weirdness. Charles strikes me as a very insecured individual. They belong with each other. As far as I'm concerned they are both weird.
he likes her because he looks good when around her. He cannot look good around a beautiful and kind person. He looks better when he is around ugly and mean people.
Charles is too weak and too old to be King.
Yes long nosed weird Charles 😂
Home wrecker! She knew exactly what she was doing.
Hello Bella, how are you doing.
"Your grandfather and my grandmother were lovers. How about it?" Well there's a chat-up line most people outside of Alabama would balk at using!
Alabama? You’re obviously very naive.
@@kristintipps6735 Well that's a very effective way to intrigue a naive person! Do tell me more... 😁
@@Maerahn that's true. That was camillas chat up line when she met Charles... it is documented as is the entwined double Cs in the especially made cuff links.
Charles is inbred.
Who is perfect please throw the first stone jesus said
Camilla had a reputation. Charles was like most men...he wanted to have a reputation. Men with reputations have the respect of their fellow men. Women just get called names. 😐 However, she still should have had a bit more respect for Princess Diana.
With the exception of the Queens late husband (to my understanding) all Royal men are expected to have consorts. They're just not supposed to be as obvious as Charles was with Camilla.
@@victoriawilliams2786 stuff is bu. lac....Ed out regard ...in g this subject....so look in. A di ff. Nation ality
Yep your right . We women get called sluts and whores if we have many lovers
He has a reputation for being a Royal 👑 fool
@@victoriawilliams2786
A *consort* is the *spouse* of a reigning monarch. Prince Philip was the *Queen's consort.*
Camilla was Charles' *mistress,* not his consort.
When he becomes king, Camilla, as his wife, will *then* become his consort. That's why she will be given the title "Princess Consort," although Charles wants to give her the title "Queen Consort."
She did NOT love Prince Charles when they were first dating! HELLO?! People just gloss over the part where that manipulative woman ONLY dated Prince Charles to make Andrew jealous! Plus being Catholic she knew Prince Charles could not (at the time) marry her! I also think she feigns interest in SOME things that interest Prince Charles as a means to manipulate him! I realize other women have done so in the past but that does not make it alright!
What makes you the expert on what she was feeling? Seriously. This is a peculiar form of madness.
They are too busy hating on Meghan!
She is definitely a manipulator and Charles was more than happy to be manipulated by her, and in turn he manipulated Diana, or should I say that Charles and Camilla were a team and manipulated Diana together. If I were Diana's sons, I would only show disgust to both of them.
correct
@@deborahcurtis1385 I think it's more that the commenter recognises the type of behavour and the thought processes behind it - I've known people like this also and I agree with 'hemily54'. Not difficult to recognise at all.
Camila is still weird and everyone will love princess Diana for what she did on this earth and that she was showing love to all kids! It wasn’t fake either.
Infidelity has been around since the dawn of history. The British aristocracy turned it into sport.
This woman has a lot to answer for. Charles is also responsible but Camilla made it easy for him to betray Diana. They were both lovers even before Charles married Diana.
If she had done the decent thing by respecting the marriage between Diana and Charles, perhaps Diana would still be with us. Camilla is a selfish and destructive woman who indirectly contributed to princes William and Harry losing their mother when they were still children. As a result, the children of Diana's boys never had the chance to know their beautiful. loving and compassionate grandmother.
Human being are selfish, kids will also plan to take others toy if they like it. This type of relationship i had seen it many times. Some successful, some not. In fact mostly successful.
Very true.
This woman is evil with no respect for other peoples lives. She will come to no good end as Buddhist, her negative karma will surface eventually which she cannot escape.
well said, Camilla is such a bitch
I totally agree. Camelia should have ended the relationship with Charles when he got married. Her poor husband had to put up with the Prince still sleeping with his wife.
Very sadly not the lady she pretends to be, or the woman Charles wants her to be after spending a fortune trying to make her. Very cold and very planning you can still see in her crumbled face and has little respect for other woman. Almost touching an older Meghan, which I guess is where Charles and Harry as weak as they are, meet. She will never be forgotten as the married bit on the side working her own way into the Royal bed, where two did lay at one time. which also highlights Charles values, in agreeing to dump Diana by orders of the Queen and then have open house for this Camilla thing or effort at being a lady which very sadly for her she is not and far more just Charles's, as mental as he is, comfy blanket or Royal hot water bottle with benefits.
You are joking ,
@King of Rome, & Earth Well, Harry is her third husband. She left each one bewildered. Left them each for a RICHER one. So…
Camilla was not from an aristocratic family, but Diana was a British aristocrat of a long lineage family.
she is totally using him and has been for decades. Hell bent on becoming queen
@Dark
Yes she is using him...the same way Meghan uses Harry. However neither Charles -nor Harry - mind being used, since they both are getting what they most want from the women they chose.
my mum says once a mistress always a mistress never be a queen camilla is a mistress
Yep.
And yet Megahn is the one who gives a bad name to the family...Camilla and Andrew are angels....talk about dysfunctional families.
Meghan is a convenient scapegoat, deflecting attention from Andrew.
Exactly
So so true Camilla is Queen after all she’s done hmm
I remember being in Italy when it all blew up. I went into a ristorante, it had a TV on the wall. The Italians were rolling about laughing.... wondering how chas could prefer camilla over Diana. I felt very uncomfortable at the time I remember.
True Italians are so shallow, they only go skin deep
It was not a question of preferring one woman over another it was being unable to cope with Diana while Camilla was an old and reliable friend .
@@annewalden3795 Diana was 19.. Young and full of life. Loved pop music and fashion/pop stars... Charles was fuddie daddy and reserved. Diana was brood mare. Camilla was horsey and 'experienced' and she mothered him.... it was a marriage made in hell probably for both of them.
@@lorrainebishop3520 Diana was full of the trauma of her childhood and developed mental health problems early in her marriage .I do not know if she received help from therapists but she seemed to be influenced by non medical practitioners which did not do her much good.
I think we all wanted a fairy tale with Charles and Diana living happy ever after but instead we got a horror story with Camilla cast as the villain .All very sad and no ones fault just a tragic outcome .
@@paulinawatts8539 well that's what you call generalising! One Suze fits all. How stupid are you then?
What I think about her , wouldn’t be allowed to describe it here.
I am feeling the same way!
@Jody Campbell
Did you hear the part about her wearing pieces of Diana's jewelry that had been gifted to Diana by Charles? I didn't think I could dislike Camilla anymore than I did.
No, I didn’t know that and I think that’s horrible.
@@dmoffatt8354 I think Diana's personal jewellery was allocated to William and Harry therefore Camilla would have no access to these pieces .Yet another incorrect story which is designed to upset the Diana apologists .
The jewellery Camilla wears is normally the property of the Crown and is loaned by the Queen as and when required.
@@annewalden3795
How is it that you missed the part about a necklace Diana wore which was a gift to her by Charles now being worn as a brooch by Camilla? Please miss me with excuses to hide the coldhearted behaviors of Charles and Camilla. Why did Charles retrieve the necklace after Diana's death, instead of letting William and Harry have it? It appears Charles saw her death as his opportunity to take back gifts he had given her.😏
She probably loves the show because that actress playing her is PRETTY
😂😂
and are looks so important? if one is fortunate one gets older & time changes all faces ... one does not marry someone because of their looks ...
@@anneroy4560 no they arent important but that doesnt mean it wouldnt be flattering to have a prettier actress play your character
😂😂😂😅
I would not ever break up any married couple. A heart is so.precious ❤
I do not know why I am watching this painful story. Camilla broke so.many hearts besides Dianna's . At least she could have taught Dianna about men.just be an old friend🤔
@@susanmetz9892 hmm. Oh
She likes to watch the crown so she can relive the trauma she put Diana through and laugh.
What a rediculous comment.
“The Rottweiler”…..As Princess Diana called her!! LoL😂🤢
“Her unusual dating history”😂
I heard she enjoyed a promiscuous high school life
Whereas Diana became very promiscuous during her marriage.
Nothing will erase what these "Royals" did out of self indulgence... PC and C should step aside in favor of Prince William. There needs to be a fresh start after everything England has been through these past years. Let PC and C enjoy their marriage and their peaceful retirement.... win-win-win
True---in not so many years -- 6 or 7--- Charles will be 80 an age rather old to take on the responsibility of being King !! Time for William and Kate to step in
I agree but I’m sure that won’t happen . Hopefully Charles doesn’t live as long as his parents
@@janieleishman9130 that mad me laugh....and I don't think I should have. Lol
@@judybrown1810 I know I probably shouldn’t have said it but it’s the truth
Oh how I agree, but doesn't Parliament have the decision on who gets the Crown? When in England we were informed that unless Charles were to abdicate, the Crown must go through succession unless by act of Parliament.
OK, I'm still waiting for the "beyond weird" things about Camilla
My husband swears she’s a man… that’s weird.
She's all weird, but so is he.
Ssshhh She's really a gargoyle LOL
I mean you can just sense the energy of weirdness beyond your screen
what about her face?
Traditionally throughout history, royals were only allowed to marry other royals (the idea of allowing them even to marry the next rung down of aristocrats was essentially an innovation of the 1920s, necessitated by the "shortage of princes" and surplus of princesses due to the casualties of World War One). Therefore, it was very common for a king to be married to a queen whom he had never met before the wedding - chosen for political reasons - who would have children by him, but otherwise live her own life in another part of the palace; while to have have a romantic/social relationship with someone he actually liked the king would take a mistress. It's really only been in the last couple of generations that royals have been able to choose their partners, and therefore don't need mistresses anymore.
Yes. People forget these rules were something they had to live by. Ordinary people had free choice.
...but they still have them!
🎪#abolishthemonarchy 🤡
Interbreeding - the children of 1st cousins, marrying 1st cousins - caused the downfall of European ‘Rule’, so ‘new blood’ was introduced ie: not in the Gotha Directory- yes, it really exists, AKA ‘RentaWomb’, which
doesn’t mean they’re not as bonkers as ever; if they were sane, they wouldn’t see the need for this ostentatious circus...a Rolls Royce for a headpiece studded with diamonds - WTF?
William’s (“one wants to be like common people: one wants to do what common people do...)embarrassment is sometimes seen, but as long as his wife gets her clothing allowance, she puts on a brave face...
Does she have any idea how many of Our Little Lady’s (cold & hungry) loyal ‘subjects’ might be fed for the price of a Philip Treacy hat?
🙏🏻💔🙏🏽
@@brendapowell4795: ‘ordinary people’? Don’t you mean ‘Hobson’s Choice’?-
“Use it up
wear it out,
make it do,
do without’
- THAT choice, like in (can I afford/choose where to live:
can I afford to feed myself AND my children: can I choose to buy children’s clothes, as long as it’s Primark/Asda (thus worsening working conditions in the 3rd World): can I choose to switch on heating/the oven/ washer/dryer/iron...:can I decide to wear wellies if I have no shoes: can I decide not to invite people over if I have nothing to offer them: can I decide not to attend wedding if I can’t afford a gift: can I decide to walk everywhere to save fuel/fares...
Insert as applicable:-
🙏🏻💔🙏🏽
Which just goes to show how outdated and antiquated the instituation of monarchy is and how something as undemocratic has no place in a modern U.K.
@@Cristobels-Green-Boots I have experienced a lot of those myself 🙂
Things beyond weird: her hair has been exactly the same for the last 58 years
Lol!
Not knowing the "history" about the Royal children of yesteryear, I give my personal opinion having been raised in a "love triangle myself as a child."
Our biological mother left my father for her own secret lover and they got married. Thankfully, my father got custardy of his eldest two children and
the younger one stayed with her. Uncertainty prevails in dark clouds as to who fathered the younger brother, but all three of us have similar facial
features of our biological mother. No more said in that regard, reservations still exist.
To my mind, Prince Charles messed up Princess Diana's life by "secretly still meeting his old flame." Then to top that off, the children born of his legal
marriage to Princess Diana, have had their lives messed up as well due to Prince Charles continuing his affair with Camilla and eventually marrying her.
Nowhere can any other person ever be considered being fully accepted by children of other parent, than their own. Especially under the circumstances
that these two young men lost their beloved mother. It is something that they will carry with them until their life comes to an end.
Désolé pour votre expérience doulereuse. J'espère que ça vous a rendu plus fort que beaucoup d'autres.
Aussi, plus sage.
Dès foos, les gens d'oublient que, la promesse ä été fait aussi à Dieu, non seulement à l'époux/ épouse.
Ceux qui ne veulent pas tenir leur promesse, mieux ne pas se marier dans l'église.
Mais, lorsque quelqu'un refuse ce type de marriage, est le signe qu'il/elle n'a pas de respect pour l'autre.
Car l'amour sans le respect n'existe point.
Crux qui disent qu'ils/elles aiment sans respectent leur chèrie, sont des MENTEURS: comment ils peuvent aimer s'ils disent des gros mots à la personne ou en présence de la persomne aimée?!
Ou, plus que ça, comment être possible à battre un autre adult dont on affirme qu'on l'aime?!
N'est pas notre enfant qu'on doit, parfois, le punir avec un giffle legère à son dos ( juste pour qu'il se rappel à ne pas repéter la bettise faite).
Entre adults devrait être suffisant a parler, argumenter et prendre un peu de recule de quelques heures/ jours afin de faire, chacun, une introspection, dans le but de constater si nous avons tort ou non et se reconcilier.
Ceux qui sont adulters, n'aiment pas leurs enfants, pareillement ceux qui disent, après un divorce, qu'il "refaitent leur vie", car ils savent que ça poura détruite la vie de leurs enfants à jamais, surtout quand il sont capable à reflechir ( même s'ils sont des bébé ou moins de 5 ans).
Si avant le mariage on se posent le problème ainsi, il n'y aura pas tant de chagrin. On fera des choix plus sages ( mon opinion).
I agree. I'm sorry your mother messed up you childhood. I hope you and your siblings are doing OK now.
She this boys where to yong to see their mother was very TOXIC woman in her marriage there where not 3 in her marriage she forgot to say 4 people in her marriage her personal security guy si? not innocent or victim at all just VERY TOXIC WOMAN
@@Ro_G C’est vrai. C’est triste.
Charles IMMATURO SENZA SCRUPOLI,SENZA DIGNITÀ
INCAPACE DI DISTINGUERE IL BENE DAL MALE
PREPOTENTE.
.HA CALPESTATO LA VITA DI UNA GIOVANE FANCIULLA
LUI VECCHIO ASTUTO VOLEVA I FIGLI DA LEI GIOVANE GENEROSA
E SPINGENDOLA NELL'ABBISSO DELLA DISPERAZIONE, UMILIANDOLA X UNA VECCHIA CIABATTA SENZA SCRUPOLI ...ASSETATA DI AGGUANTARE IL TRONO ...
CON QUELLA FACCIA INESPRESSIVA È STATO USATO X RAGGIUNGERE I SUOI TRAGUARDI
QUELLO CHE DI MALE HA RISERVATO ALLA PRINCIPESSA E AI FIGLI HA FATTO PIANGERE IL MONDO
DOVREBBE NASCONDERSI DALLA VERGOGNA
MA È TALMENTE LIMITATO E OTTUSO DI CERVELLO CHE RIDE INSIEME ALL'ARPIA IN BARBA AL MONDO
SARÀ ANCHE CAPO DELLA CHIESA ANGLICANA..??
ALLORA NN SARÀ PIÙ UNA CHIESA
MA UNA CARICATURA DI CHIESA, uno SPERGIURO ALLE NOZZE...
CATTIVO ESEMPIO PER TUTTI
I am reminded of a quote by the late Sir James Goldsmith which says "when a man marries his mistress, it creates a job vacancy". Well, the old grey mare ain't what she used to be ... not that she was anything much to begin with!
How would you know whether she was anything, to begin with? Did your husband talk?
Silly comment.
Lol. It's rude. I dont want to be rude.
@@reynoldgooding7626 I feel appropriately chastened by your witty admonishment 😊
@@MsAbyss123 🤣🤣🤣
Although I live in the USA I will never except her as Queen in any form
Me either, as a fellow American
Lol..the blackout , the prince of darkness..lol just so he could sneak Camilla around. So hilarious
I never really like this Camilla, is my opinion . She was sneaky and hypocrite women. And he was dishonest to young Dianna .
I recall late night American talk-show host Jay Leno comparing Camilla Parker Bowles appearance - unfavourably - with a horse! But thats a tad unkind: Both Camilla and her beau "Bonny Prince Charlie are well matched indeed. The couple are both death-sports fanatic's, with the Charli and Camilla spending up to five days per week ,terrorising, chasing and tearing apart defenceless small furry creatures - foxes - for entertainment. An environmentalist? Don't make me vomit!
Glenn Boyd
Your viewpoint sums it up exactly.
Leno has no business judging anyone .About anything
... Camila has not aged well, she has More wrinkles thank the Queen.
@@militzamadrid462 that's because The Queen is richer and can afford anti wrinkling stuff
@@lilyharris7629 💰💰💰💰
I just hate the woman she had the nerve to show up at Diana's weddings Camilla even had to make that day miserable for poor Diana😥💔
You're just a bundle of emotion, aren't you?
@@bnic9471 Yes it's totally unproductive to go around hating someone whether you know someone or not.
And she even wore white to Diana’s wedding. But the Queen got back at her by wearing white to Charles & Cowmilla’s wedding.
It’s heartbreaking 💔 seeing Camilla. Diana tears will be on her shoulder, always. Her evil ways makes she looks so old.
she looks old because she is old & naught wrong with that ... they do not use plastic surgery over here as they do in the states ...
She's old, and she used to smoke tobacco. She's also said to be a pretty stable person, which is why she is Charles' wife, now, and not Diana.
After greeting Diana on the Patterson Skytrain Platform, for Expo 86, I will never accept them both. Diana would of made a wonderful Queen but Charlie had his mistress. 🇨🇦
Of coarse she likes watching The Crown, she can pretend that’s what she looked like instead of what she really did!
hahahaha love it
lol. coarse!!! LOL!!! hilarious.
I now know what they mean when they say beauty is in the eye of the beholder how ugly this camilla women is inside and out
Hahaha. I wouldn't want to be the poor actor who portrays her. They will have to advertise for old and extremely wrinkled. Ugly on the inside eventually seeps into the outside. Sure did with her face. lol
Respect Diana's memory and renounce the Throne.
My royal fascination is dying out. Especially, now that Camilla Deville is queen consort.
Hello Tina, how are you doing.
Yes, it put the almost final nail in that coffin for me also. Charles' failure to remove the titles of H & M and deal appropriately with their defamation and fraudulent conduct was the final!
The Adulteress of Cornwall's friends have not done a good job of keeping her in line.
Now she is the "Adulteress Queen Consort. Things are looking up for her and I'm sure becoming his mistress has been the best thing she ever did for herself. No worries about how her children would cope with a mother everyone hated.
@@dorothyhiltz7207 --a different kind of consort
If they were no objection from prince's family and they got married since they were young and single, there wouldn't be a trio drama.
He may not have know what was going on at the time. She only mentioned to her sisters. Who told her it was to late to back out.
They are what they are. There would still be drama, just of a different nature.
For ''being a flirt''....read easy...as someone close to that circle said...''there were girls who didn't...she was one of the girls who did''...so along the way she learned what men liked...
I feel they should have been excluded from the throne. Why do they morally get a pass?
Morally they most definitely don't. It's just their disgusting 'gloss it over and forget it' mentality that has pushed the monarchy further into the gutter imo.
HRH The Adultress of Cornwall, Chlamydia Parker-Bowels AKA "Cowmilla"
Ouch…🇨🇦
Ha Ha good one. Also Princess Anne had an affair with Andrew Parker Bowles.
She was even married with children but still broke through into Diana s married. That's very selfish of her.
I wonder if they r the parents of the Australian man who says he is their son and wants a DNA test done
He's got brown eyes. C and C have blue eyes. Not possible.
I think a DNA test should be done.
He should be allowed it. His adoptive parents did work for the late Queen and Philip so...
It was a common practice to hide an illegitimate royal child that way, in any countries royal house..
@@juliaforsyth8332 absolutely possible. Genes regress, they have people in the family with brown eyes. My daughter is mixed race, her father and I both have brown eyes. My daughter has my nans green eyes.
@@annesmith6582 he will never get that DNA and its sad. Once hidden things are hard to come to light with this dreadful family. It's all about image and maintaining that false dignified hierarchy.
Little known fact: Camilla's full name is Camilla Parker Toilet Bowles..🚽🥳😁
I have NEVER accepted her for what she did to Diana…and she has the gull to continue this charade! UGH 👿
I agree!
She has no valuable morales
And yet the Queen accepted her…
@@annettefowler4704 Morals Annette. It’s ‘Morals’
Well I try to be a Christian but there are some things forgive but her pretending to befriend cheating with friends spouse but the possibility of murder rather than accident I do not know. She help choose Diana as spouse she wanted to be mistress it is too complicated
I think Charles knew he was running out of time to marry and have children. He had been involved with many attractive young ladies but they did not want to be his wife. In Diana he found a girl who had little experience of life but she was pretty and pleasant ; more important she was willing to marry him despite the age gap and lack of common interests. Both parties to the marriage were wildly optimistic about the chances of success and it is sad that they created a disaster for themselves , their families and the Country. A tragic outcome to lose Diana and to leave 2 young boys without a mother.
@@annewalden3795 Charles might have married Diana's older sister, except for her big mouth, talking about marriage to the paparazzi and letting the cat out of the bag too early in their relationship. Charles was aghast and angry, and broke it off. She might have been more suited to Charles than her younger sister was.
@@judylloyd7901 I had not appreciated that Charles broke off the relationship with Diana's sister.
Great photo, was this before or after her latest face lift? Charles the Tampon King isn’t fit to be a king. I’m sure they’ve all watched the Crown. Lol
I have wonder how he will do as Pope of the Church of England?
He didn't need to marry Diana then cheat. His uncle Edward married for love and kept his marriage vows sacred. Charles wanted his cake and eat it too. Karma might have something to say about it.
Agreed! And, we ALL reap what we sow - from kings and queens down to the lowest. It may take time but it WILL come.
Nobody ever mentions how and when Charles' ears got flat.
Or where they were trapped!
It was probably the tampon costume!
My loyalty is with Diana.
Hello Rosemary, I hope you're safe over there? I hope this year brings happiness, prosperity, and love all over the world, I would love us to be good friends in honesty and in trust if you don't mind. I'm Well Martins Originally from France but I live in Detroit Michigan, where are you from if I may ask?
Camilla has no expectations of beingore popular than Charles ...so different than HRH Diana whose popularity Outshone Charlie everytime even now
Camilla was a perfect fit being as morally corrupt as Charles. How manipulative and cruel she was, taking the naive Diana to lunch at the "Ménage à Trois" restaurant when Diana first started dating Charles. Charles was batting above his station with Diana. Her heritage was actual British aristocracy.
I don't believe Diana tried to upstage Charles, it just happened. She was young, pretty and personable to the people something the Royals never did. I remember thinking they were so boring before she came into the family. She livened them up and made them interesting, no fault of her own. They weren't that pretty and here comes beautiful Diana dresses in beautiful and modern clothes who truly loved her children determined their lives would be different than the status quo. Altho I don't like Camilla at all, she seems to make HRH happy; she could never out shine him. LOL
Im old enough to remember history as I lived through it and I’ll never forgive Charles & Camilla for what they did. She has no right to be Queen. Interesting how everyone has forgotten.
Family trees are interesting, aren't they? The blood connection of Elizabeth & Phillip for example. But you have to dig a little deeper to discover the blood link of Camilla & Charles. It is a little closer than the mentioned master/mistress relationship. The royals used to have an interesting way of acknowledging their "bastards", they'd become a godfather to them. I know that this "habit" was still in place in Philip's day. Was it still done in Charles' generation?
Yeh but dig deeper you will know that real royal blood was assassinated murdered and the Throne was Stolen
@Janette Webster. It would be interesting to know if the man claiming to be Camilla and Charles son has managed to obtain their DNA. I doubt it though sadly.
@@mac4039 yeah I thought at the time reading that's shocking. No one should be denied knowing parents.
@@mac4039 he will have to wait until they throw away a milkshake container and get the DNA.. laughing. I hope though someone gets it to him somehow (steal Charles toothbrush say the corgis took off with it).
@@mac4039 yeah good to laugh. I'm glad Prince Charles has company though that he relates to.
It must've been a lonely childhood.
Sorry to be so catty, but she’s not the most attractive lady…..just sayin. Beyond my cattiness, not fond of this woman bc she made herself available to Charles the whole time he was married to Diana. That said, Charles isn’t much better: if he wanted the other woman, he should have stayed with her and not ruined Diana’s life! They deserve each other, I guess!
I think she is part "Mummy" for him. Or grandmother at this stage.
Charles needed a mommy. So did Harry. And Edward VIII. Sad.