This POWERFUL Strategy Can Solve Very Hard Sudoku - SHC 250

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 28

  • @SmartHobbies
    @SmartHobbies  Місяць тому +2

    📕Get my FREE Solving Guide that will help you solve over 80% of all Sudoku puzzles🧩to include NYT Hard👉👉www.buymeacoffee.com/timberlakeB/e/125822
    Timestamps
    0:00 Intro
    00:21 It’s Solving Time
    00:40 Puzzle Story
    01:56 BONUS Tip
    04:30 What To Do After Snyder Done
    04:55 Surprising Intermediate Strategy #1
    06:36 Searching For Single Candidate Strategies
    10:40 Surprising Intermediate Strategy #2
    15:00 Setting Up Powerful Strategy
    18:24 Powerful Strategy Revealed
    23:00 Following The Snyder

  • @michaellfbvr
    @michaellfbvr Місяць тому +2

    That was a pretty good puzzle

  • @jonbrowne
    @jonbrowne Місяць тому +2

    Brilliant puzzle and looked very hard to solve with so much to spot! Thanks Timberlake

    • @SmartHobbies
      @SmartHobbies  Місяць тому +1

      You are welcome, Jon. I was blown away by the cleverness of this one. Truly deserved to be highly rated on LMD.

  • @JohnRandomness105
    @JohnRandomness105 Місяць тому +2

    I did it last night, and had to sleep right after. What I remember: three or four X-wings, a Y-wing, and a "nice continuous loop"? I still had to bifurcate.
    0:40 That 8? Placed early as my first digit. My second digit was far later -- a 3 in the corner if I recall correctly. (BTW, a UA-cam video has a song about 3 in the corner.)
    4:40 Your question: shortly before I reached that point, while I was still cornermarking 8s, I found and applied an X-wing in 8s -- rows 1 and 9. At your point in the grid, I found the X-wing in 4s -- columns 1 and 9. Then I centermarked a few blocks, and tried finding restricted cells, to minimal success. I returned to centermarking blocks. The next feature was a 567 triple in column 3.
    5:10 I found that 249 triple backwards: instead, I found the 1567 quad in row 3. (It chopped five-digit cells down to two or three digits.) One interesting feature that wasn't useful in itself: the four corners were all bivalued cells, X9 -- 9 and some other digit.
    7:00 I found the X-wing in 2s before finding the 1567 quad. It was my third X-wing. And now, I noticed something I missed in my solve: two of the cells -- R5C1 and R5C9 -- were common to both the 2 and 4 X-wings. That gave a 24 pair that I missed, due to clutter.
    11:10 You never saw that before? It appeared a couple times on CtC, where I first learned it. I once saw three swordfish that shared the same cells in a column. That gave a triple.
    11:50 Because I didn't think of the 24 pair, I didn't get the 3 until a 259 Y-wing.
    12:40 The 6s were my final X-wing, the 8s were my first X-wing, and like 24, I didn't get the 68 pair.
    16:50 Again, I found the 34 pair backwards: I saw the 567 triple first.
    19:10 The Y-wing that I found was completely different: 259 in columns 1 and 2. It gave me the 3 in the corner and removed a bunch of 9s.
    Video's END: I found this loop, which I believe is a form of "nice continuous loop": rows 2 and 9, columns 1 and 9. Counterclockwise from R9C9: 59, 19, 12, 25. Because of everything I missed, I still bifurcated.
    About clutter: centermarking the grid lets me find positions that I usually would otherwise miss. The disadvantage: I miss things.

    • @SmartHobbies
      @SmartHobbies  Місяць тому +2

      Nice job finding the loop, John. There were a few different ways to approach this after the X-Wings.

  • @paulakeay4317
    @paulakeay4317 Місяць тому +2

    What a beautiful puzzle and a real joy. I loved all the different techniques needed. I saw it differently from how you did- I saw the naked quad first, and same for the triple into the 34. For a reason unknown, I didn’t see the XY wing in the usual way. Early on I recognised the corner cells were BV cells, and that at least one must contain a 9. It was clearly an unintended solve path and sent me on some long, complicated adventures 😂 ultimately I saw it as rings on R1C1/ R1C9/ R9C1/ R9C9 and R1C2/ R1C8/ R9C2/ R9C8, with some eliminations possible, after all the lovely x-wings first of course. I wish I’d have unfolded the story of it in the intended way though, just fabulous sudoku creation. One to save to my favourites.

    • @SmartHobbies
      @SmartHobbies  Місяць тому +2

      Outstanding, Paula. Glad you liked it!

  • @AnonimityAssured
    @AnonimityAssured Місяць тому +2

    A war of attrition, but a fun one. Anything but a notation-free quickie. The overlapping X-Wings were most satisfying. My version of HoDoKu rates the puzzle as Unfair rather than Hard, but with the same score. Intriguingly, the broken symmetry might be made symmetrical with only the slightest tweak, yielding a puzzle of very similar difficulty and a near-identical solution path:
    001 204 500
    004 090 060
    800 000 003
    100 009 005
    009 000 600

    • @SmartHobbies
      @SmartHobbies  Місяць тому +2

      Cool. I loved the basic idea of this puzzle. I need to check your variation out, Julian.

  • @francoisepichot181
    @francoisepichot181 29 днів тому +2

    Thank you very much Timberlake, that is such a great puzzle ! I did it again on paper one day after your explanations and I manage to crack it. Thank you so much because that is the level I like to exercise . Best regards. Françoise

  • @anaayoung9142
    @anaayoung9142 Місяць тому +1

    Your solve was absolutely phenomenal. All the wings founded were amazing. Thanks for that! 😊

    • @SmartHobbies
      @SmartHobbies  29 днів тому +2

      Glad you liked it Ana. I thought this was a phenomenal puzzle. 🧩

  • @francoisepichot181
    @francoisepichot181 29 днів тому +2

    Thank you very much Timberlake, that is such a great puzzle ! I did it again on paper one day after your explanations and I manage to crack it, not exactly like you but I found the Xwings, the pointing pairs and after worked with finding Xchain ☺ Thank you because that is this level I like to exercise to improve ☺ Best regards. Françoise

    • @SmartHobbies
      @SmartHobbies  28 днів тому +2

      Outstanding, Francoise! So great to hear from you. Glad to know that you continue to improve your solving skills.

  • @georgesthibaudeau1533
    @georgesthibaudeau1533 Місяць тому +2

    After seeing all the restrictions you marked with snyder notions, I saw the X Wings of 2s and 4s in columns 1 and 9 (which cause 24s to be a pair in r5c1+9. and then the X Wings of 6 and 8 in rows 1 and 9 (which cause 68 to be a pair in r1+9c5.. Then the clear certainty is that the 3 must be in r1c1. Then I completed the puzzle and as everything seemed to work well, I ended up with a mistake of 2s and 5s only in blocks 5 and 6. I know my mistake originated in block 1. I need to review what I did wrong there. I suspect now that a 5 must be in r9c1 I placed it in r2c1, and hebce a 9 in r9c1

    • @SmartHobbies
      @SmartHobbies  Місяць тому +2

      Oh wow. I hope you figure it out Georges. Thank you for sharing.

  • @BradJames878
    @BradJames878 Місяць тому +3

    I find this type of puzzle layout difficult. I didn't see any clue as when to pull off basic Snydering and start coloring single candidates, so I just kept filling in possibly restricted cells until it appeared no longer useful. Then I started coloring single candidates and found x-wings. But there is no good way to notate cells that have been eliminated using x-wings, so I fill in all the other cells in the block with the candidate (using corner marking), which eliminates the usefulness of Snyder. So then the board was very cluttered and I wasn't able to remember which x-wings overlapped. Total puzzle solve time, 1:42, not counting time watching the video or filling out the comment.

  • @darcash1738
    @darcash1738 22 дні тому +2

    Ive been doing sudoku in Freeform(that one drawing app) for a bit now, but now I’ve gotten good at all variants of column restriction eliminations-xwing, swordfish, jellyfish kraken etc. I manually highlight the candidate num and start from the highest going down, and eliminate possible rows for usage if they don’t align with any others up to whatever number of columns it’s restricted to. I’ve actually gotten very quick at doing this, but the slow thing for me is filling in all candidates in the cells and doing the highlighting. Is there some app that has features like this? Or perhaps even an app that will make all solves restricted to certain strategies so you can focus on weaknesses?

    • @SmartHobbies
      @SmartHobbies  22 дні тому +3

      I am so happy to hear about your progress. I like to use Hodoku desktop app to pre-fill candidates and use their practice and learning modes to create puzzles with specific strategies. Here is a link to my tutorial where I show you how to do both easily: ua-cam.com/video/QCVOSevcYoI/v-deo.htmlsi=tlOX8K5NsB6ODJkC

    • @darcash1738
      @darcash1738 21 день тому +2

      @@SmartHobbies awesome, thanks!

  • @sharmilisharmili472
    @sharmilisharmili472 Місяць тому +1

    Spotted everything except for XY wing.

    • @SmartHobbies
      @SmartHobbies  29 днів тому +1

      Nice job! What did you use at the end to completely crack it?

    • @sharmilisharmili472
      @sharmilisharmili472 29 днів тому +2

      ​@@SmartHobbiesI remember getting x wings on 2,4,6,8.
      Got 68 pair in col 5 ( due to overlapping of 6/8 x wings)
      I think in row 5 , instead of writing 24 pair, i wrote 234 on one end at R5C1 and 24 on the other end at R5C9.
      Got row3 with 1567 quad and also 34 pair in col3, pointing 7's in top row of box 3.
      I used a diff loop involving cols 1 and 9, rows 2 and 9 ( 12-->19-->59-->25) but that helped me to get rid of just one 5 at R8C1.
      Bla bla...
      Then I sneaked into ur video to complete the puzzle.
      Great puzzle indeed.

  • @michaellfbvr
    @michaellfbvr Місяць тому +3

    If you are trying to teach difficult solving strategies (much appreciated) why do you spend so much time going over the very basics?

    • @SmartHobbies
      @SmartHobbies  Місяць тому +2

      Great question. I have several people come to my channel through my beginner and intermediate tutorials. I run through the basics to try and bridge the gap between basic and more advanced strategies. Are there particular strategies or difficulty level you would like to see, Michael?