Siskel & Ebert & Roeper - Some Funny Moments While Reviewing Films
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 лип 2024
- My 3rd installment in the series. Roger Ebert, Gene Siskel and Richard Roeper talking movies. Their bad experiences that turn out to be fun for us viewers. Sorry for not including more of Roeper in this one.
"Who wants to see a lambada film that ends in a trigonometry bee?"
"Who in the world wants to go to a lambada movie that ends with a trigonometry bee?" is one of the greatest sentences in history. Visitors from 5509, you're welcome.
I didn't understand what Roger said at first, because I didn't understand "bee". Now I know.
@@sha11235 same here.
I laughed out loud. Gosh, how much better this world was with these two marvelous men in it. Thanks, boys.
I'm sad to think we never got to hear Siskel's thoughts on Batman Begins
An actual excerpt from Ebert's written review of North "I hated this movie. Hated hated hated hated hated this movie. Hated it. Hated every simpering stupid vacant audience-insulting moment of it. Hated the sensibility that thought anyone would like it. Hated the implied insult to the audience by its belief that anyone would be entertained by it."
Unquote
Eberts put down of Brain Candy is HILARIOUS!!!
😂😂😂😂
There's a scene in Batman Returns where Bruce Wayne is sitting in the dark, alone, thinking, brooding, waiting. Then the Bat-Signal shines in the window and the moment's over. But that two-second scene tells us more about Bruce than the entirety of Batman & Robin.
21:20, “a cousin? A nephew? A next door neighbor?!” My favorite line.
"You should be embarrassed, Gene."
Spine Craft “Roger, what happened to your sense of humor?” 😂
Ebert was such an eloquent man. A warrior poet.
Alto Domino the fuck is all this warrior shit? Poet warrior? So if a guy is a good cook he’s a chef warrior? The fuck outta here with that shit. Go look up what a warrior is.
@@bloodtimemaximusfullthrott226 ok keyboard warrior
@@benjaminmonroy8622 ROFL
@@bloodtimemaximusfullthrott226 you’re another internet raging insane person. 😂
The North review is an all time classic
Especially for me, since that weekend, my father passed away from cancer. So separating from your parents is not a light thing.
I remember that I watched North as a kid. And it made so little of an impact on my child brain that I don’t know if I liked it or not.
@@sha11235 I'm sorry for your loss
@@sha11235 yes I’m also sorry for you loss
“George Clooney is a good looking bore.” Owwwwwwww!
VERY funny stuff. Oh how I miss the personalities, knowlege, egos, talent of these two wonderful men.
The banter between them during the Brain Candy review is a bromance. ♥️👊🏼
LOL 11:00 "Brain Candy Roger... Brain Candy!"
Ding dong man! Ding dong! Ding dong yo!
Funny! Loved it when Gene and Roger would get on each other....
The Leonard Part 6 review is also very funny.
Siskel and Ebert were gold!
Man, Bruce Willis is QUITE the fixture of these videos lol
Can’t believe Rob Reiner directed one of “the most thoroughly hateful movies in recent years”
Roger Ebert said one thing that applies to practically all movies today - everything is arbitrary
The greatest put down of all time: “I thought this was: Awful, dreadful, terrible, stupid, idiotic, unfunny, laboured, forced, painful, bad.” It’s just as good as: “I hated this movie. Hated, hated, hated, hated, hated, hated this movie! I hated it! Hated every single, stupid, audience-insulting moment of it!”
In the age of the internet, there will never be another Siskel & Ebert, because there are ten thousand people who think they can be Siskel & Ebert.
That is one of the best points.
There was no Siskel and Ebert before Siskel and Ebert, they were originals. I think there are people who are passionate about movies that have made careers and personas for themselves, and none of them should aspire to be another critic
Oh boy, how right you are!
Mike and Jay
@@Citizen_J While RLM is entertaining, I doubt many people turn to their show for actual reviews and recommendations. RLM is known primarily for dunking on whatever the latest blockbuster is while, on rare occasions, making an obscure recommendation here and there.
Haha. “A friend of the other shark” cracked me up.
A better one would be it is the original shark reincarnated.
Miss these guys. Loved their show.
I'm sure Gene gave Lambada a thumb up just to piss Roger off
Ebert drops the ball on Brain Candy
He dropped it because why hold onto a movie this bad.
I did a double-take when Gene casually mentioned Melora Hardin in his Lambada review. Jan from The Office knew how to get down even then!
Well, she was the co-star there.
lmaooo ebert's lambada review
Gotta love Gene's face when he holds his laughs
This is amazing. Thank you. Haven't seen some of these.
This is pure gold in video form. Thank you so much!
10:25 -- But how do you REALLY feel about it, Roger? (A GENUINE LOLOL moment)
If you watched their Jaws: The Revenge review over and over for 90 minutes, it would still be more entertaining than watching the movie.
The more compilations of these guys on UA-cam, the better
I loved Hudson Hawk when I was little because we sang Swing On A Star in the school choir 😂
These guys were awesome!
Ebert: Spider-Man was too cartoonish😂😂😂 hahaha
he was right
So I guess when you film dance sequences in a film, don't shoot from the butt up LOL. Good observation lol. I wouldn't have noticed.
I love these guys!! Yes I'm a dork...lmbo
I love Hudson Hawk, it's great.
No, boredom, boredom with Benji running!
Boy it sure sounded like Roeper was giving Spider Man a thumbs down
The North review is a classic.
That North review is epic
During the Brain Candy review, Siskel implies that Ebert may not have “gotten” it, and boy does Ebert get genuinely pissed.
When I was in high school my friends and I were huge fans of kids in the hall. I couldn't wait to see brain candy...I was disappointed.
Her name is just a trivia answer...damn!!...lmbo
Brain Candy did not become a midnight cult film.
Are you sure about that?
@@ianmcnaney6528 Yes, as far as I know. You see it playing at midnight anywhere around you?
It was a disappointment at box office
Man Roger went off on Lambada, this is hilarious
every single line starts from zero and goes nowhere!!!
Guessing Ebert or roper never saw the Spiderman comics
Or even READ the Spider-Man comics.
I sort of agree with Roger about Spider Man. And why did you cut off some of Roger's words during the review?
Michael Caine apparently skipped the Oscars where he would have accepted an award because he was busy filming Jaws: the Revenge. The Oscars are nothing but a joke now, it's like when you give the special kids at school "good guy" trophies, but back then people still cared. Michael Caine, ahead of his time, gave ZERO shits about the stupid Oscars.
At least the second time he won the Oscar for the same category, he was there.
Brain Candy is genius.
From what I saw here, Hudson Hawk doesn't look too bad.
I think if you watch the whole film, you'll agree with everyone who hated it. I haven't seen it myself, but I think that would happen if I watched it.
I find the movie quite entertaining of course I'm a B film lover, and seek out the hidden gems like this one.
It's not as good as an average "Moonlighting" episode.
Yes but the director of north made some great movies: sure thing, misery,
Roger mentioned that in his print review of North. And on the tv show, with the next film he did The American President, Roger mentioned North and what he said to compare it to AP, which he loved.
Hudson Hawk is hilarious.
They enjoyed Jaws the revenge
Agreed with Ebert about Spider-Man the CGI stuff was terrible
At times it was great but others, especially the scene with the kids and the goblin, were TERRIBLE wow lmaooo. Spider-man 2 had AMAZING cgi
@@Blodia1990 I supposed it got better as it went along. But the overuse of CGI was disappointing to see from someone like Sam Raimi who did such good practical effects in other movies.
@@johnnyskinwalker4095 It was indeed sad to see Raimi relying on CGI so much but it is practically impossible to practically have a stuntman fly through the skies without a huge risk of serious and life threatening injuries.
@@Blodia1990 I think some things could be worked out better with minimal CGI. Like the helicopter work in Darkman, it was all stunt work with a real guy hanging from a rope. Not to mention in the movie The Fly they had Jeff Goldblum sticking to walls as a human-fly and there was no CGI there, it was all practical, they had build a whole room that they would move around and the effect was stunning on screen.
I think with the Spider-Man movies, it is mainly because Raimi did not have the freedom that he could have had on movies that he imagined himself, these were big movies and when you jump into that, you have to accept their rules. And it was easier as a big production to just go for the CGI and that's it. (Although I have noticed that in Amazing Spider-Man, they used stunt work more for Andrew Garfield and it already looked much better, (even though it was a bad movie))
I had problems with the parts where buildings fall down. So soon after 9/11, it bothered me.
Roger was right about BRAIN CANDY
Ebert was so wrong about Spider-Man, good thing he liked SM2.
He was completely correct about both movies SM2 > SM1
@@joejay4646 SM1 is a perfect superhero movie. Aside from some CGI looking a little dated, it's a perfect superhero film.
Jaws the revenge was absolutely horrible.
The hudson hawk film was a down period for bruce willis until his career with Travolta was resurrected by by pulp fiction.
Bruce came up with the damn story himself!
Hudson hawk was his first bomb as a lead which then lead to a couple of more bombs death becomes her and color of night. But I wouldn't say it was much of a down period seeing that die hard 2 came out one year earlier than hudson hawk and the last boy scout came out the same year as hudson hawk, both had commercial success
9:11 looks like Dr. Rachel Levine
Brain Candy is a classic. Ebert is waaaay off. KitH are geniuses
I remember being disappointed when I saw "Batman & Robin". A true bummer.
Gene mentioning the thing about Poison Ivy: That wasn't the point anyway about the victims scratching. She had lethal lips.
Nobody cares now, but it's not "North by Northwest" SMH. THAT'S a classic; the movie was called "North".
North. One of the most atrocious misfires I have ever seen. This tried to use wit as a disguise to its colossal cold hearted plot device. Now. Irreconcilable Differences. That's a far better movie about this subject. Batman and Robin, better used as a dangerously idea of a drinking game using puns. Yikes! Jaws: The Revenge...in my top 40 worst films ever.
North: hard to believe it came from Reiner, who's got one of the best track records for excellent films. Batman&Robin: well, at least Alicia Silverstone looks hot, squeezed into that leather costume. Thumbs down to the movie; penis up for the deposit into my Spank Bank.
And do you know who made her film debut in that film? Scarlett Johansen.
Jaws the Revenge is the mother of all the roaring sharks that came after, a movie way ahead of its time.
North is absolutely atrocious.
HudsonHawk was just ahead of it’s time; when I heard everyone trashing it, I knew I had to see it. 😊
James Coburn was fantastic in that…
Shark 4 wants revenge for the deaths of the previous 3 - sounds reasonable enough. If they were close relatives of 4, that would be 3 very good reasons to want revenge. Problem solved.
James Cameron they’re sharks you fucking mong.
@@thefonzkiss Sharks are curious animals that denotes intelligence, they're not mindless killers.
At least there has never been a fifth shark wanting revenge.
Hudson Hawk is so annoyingly awful.
14:52 first use of the word emoting on TV, years before we would have hundreds of emoji’s at our fingertips
The 1st Raimi Spiderman sucked ASS. There, I said it.
Everything to do with Uncle Ben is not just good but excellent. I don't mind the rest of the movie but come on, suck is a strong word
"Maybe I'll watch Brain Candy again in the 21st century." Put your money where your mouth is, Rog! Review this movie again today and tell me it isn't funny! Oh, oh, you're dead?! A convenient excuse.
He had about 13 years to watch it again, but I guess he didn't.
Brain candy is one of my favorite movies ever. I’m not exaggerating. I bought three copies of the dvd just so I could give two of them away. When I was in college, I used that movie like therapy. I watched it when I was overwhelmed by being a molecular cell biology major at Berkeley, just like how I sat at the feet of the trex skeleton and talked it through my neurosis. . . Brain candy is, in my opinion, the best movie I have ever had to get me through my own life. It is way more than a movie. It is a personal therapist at the price of a dvd. I love brain candy. I have agreed with ebert in other reviews. But this one is way over the line. I simply cannot respect anyone who does not like brain candy. It is the sort of movie that says way more about who is watching it than the film itself. Ebert just killed his reputation. I watch brain candy at least once a year just to maintain my own sanity.
So do you agree with Ebert's assessment? You're unclear
Are you serious? You’re favorite movie is Brain Candy? You know there are other movies right? Like... good ones too.
This isn't funny at all to me but interesting
Batman and Robin and Batman Forever are far and away much greater films that any of the 3 Chris Nolan piles of trash.
I don’t know if you’re trolling or just simple.
@@studbstrd3589 Take a guess.
Tyler Waters both!
Tyler Waters personally, I prefer Burton’s Batman movies to Nolan’s or Schumacher’s. While I do like quite a bit of Schumacher’s movies, his writing and directing can’t really compare to Nolan’s...especially with the Batman movies. But that really doesn’t excuse my two previous comments which were kinda rude. Sorry about that...I’m in one of those moods. Cheers man, keep well.
@@studbstrd3589 Haha no worries. I was obviously being sarcastic. Nolan's movies are the best Batman movies IMO, although the Burton ones aren't bad. Batman and Robin and Batman Forever aren't even watchable.