Desde Mexico, Te agradezco por este video. Preciosa la musica, bello paisaje. Hermosa la gente de Peru. Dios bendiga este pais lindo y bello ❤❤🇲🇽🇲🇽 4-25-2021
Definitely a fascinating & cleverly innovative race of people who obviously found something built earlier by an ancient group of people & simply built on that.
Don't listen to that BS. The Incas "obviously" built their own stuff from the ground up. I live in Ollantaytambo and can see every stage of construction all around. Guys like Brien Foerster may have believed their foolishness when they were young and ignorant, but by now he has been consciously lying for decades.
@@edwardanthony7283 Many cultures predated the Inca, but none of them built in megalithic stone (except the Chavin), and none of them provided the foundations for the Inca structures. Those were all pure Inca. If you come here I can show yoiu stones in every phase of masonry from raw andesite to polished workmanship.
@@edwardanthony7283 Based on what? Divine revelation? Or the videos of that uneducated con artist Foerster? Never mind. All the professional historians and archaeologists just laugh and ignore all that and so will I. Good luck outrunning Darwin.
Wanted to explore on those steps in Ollantaytambo but our tour guide took us to see Peruvian kitchen and Guinea pigs. This town that we got on the train to Machu Picchu. Love Peru.
Inca stumbled across these ruins and then built on top of them, it's visible everywhere you look. Anyone who still perpetuates this obvious lie that the Inca built all of it should be embarrassed and ridiculed into obscurity and shame.
@@adamseward4713 There are a lot of unanswered questions such as why are the finer quality works below the later lesser quality ones. Also, the general consensus is that the Incas arrived in the 12 th century and were conquered in the 16th century, so all of these constructions must have been completed in a 4 century span. But construction is not instant, all technology derives from prior technologies as it gains sophistication, and we don't see a progression from primitive to modern in these sites, they appear to have just sprung forth instantly. I think some folks with knowledge of construction and society could make an educated guess as to the viability of a population that was agrarian, which requires long days of toil in the fields, finding sufficient free time and skilled workers to complete all these works.
@@oldschool1993 Actually, current theory has it that almost all of the Inka architecture was constructed in less than a century. That's believable, the Inkas had a functionally infinite labor force, a genius for organization and efficiency, superb engineers, and worked hard. I watched pure-blood day laborers carrying 20 kilo sacks of freshly harvested choclo maize on their back at a dead run; the woman I was with said, "It's like we're watching Inkas work,:" and she was right. However, it is true, there's not much evidence of the evolution of Inka masonry - it is as if it sprung up whole from one mind during the reign of Pachacutiq. Maybe it did, he was a creative genius. At any rate, there's no indication of a preceding culture developing that unique style of stonework. The Tiwanakans may have influenced them but their styles are definitely, if subtly to the untrained eye, unalike. I suspect that the architecture grew more gradually in the Cuzco valley than is currently. theorized. Archeology, paleoanthropology, paleontology, can only expand backwards in time, and that is what it does. It is one of many puzzles left by a people whose literature was knotted strings, whose libraries were systematically destroyed by the church, and for which there is no Rosetta Stone. But it is clear by the great stones left behind in a seamless progression of stages from raw rock to fine finished masonry that each building was constructed by the same people, architects, engineers, straw bosses, and *hatun runakuna,* from the ground up. No Old Ones of Lemuria, no alien technology, and no 20,000 year-old Lost Advanced Civilizations of little Brien Foersters, Graham Hancocks, Michael Cremos, or DH Childresses are necessary to explain anything.
@@adamseward4713 Well you do give a good argument in support of current theory, and it is a clue as to why your response to the original poster was so vitriolic. I am not a proponent of aliens or lost civilizations either, but I am open to reasonable questions regarding these constructions. I have been around long enough to know that the greatest impediment to scientific advancement has always been the supporters of the currently accepted theory. Going back to Galileo, Schliemann, the Leakeys, the Alvarez' and many many more, the one consistent fact is that every one of them were attacked and ridiculed by the established scientific community. It is quite understandable that a person that studied and devoted his life to teaching something that he believed as fact would be reluctant to toss it all away in the face of new facts or theories. I can remember being told by sober professors that the dinosaurs died of some pandemic and wooly mammoths were hunted to extinction by a few tribes of humans and Neanderthals were a bunch of hunched-over grunting savages, ideas that would bring gales of laughter today.
@@oldschool1993 Institutional conservatism is the second obstacle to scientific discovery. That is based on the desire to preserve the credibility of the tradition, just as the Vatican is reluctant to canonize a potato that looks like the Virgin Mary and sheds tears: they don't want to be laughed at or sneered at or abandoned for validating ten thousand ridiculous claims. The first obstacle to scientific advancement is popular opinion, which, on one hand, is conservative in clinging to "common sense" (the wild crazy theory of their great grandparents' time) and on the other, the primordial desire to believe in the fantastic and sensational. Not long ago demons and evil spirits fought with saints and angels over the daily lives of peasants. But more commonly in these times, people just want someone to thrill them, to excite them, to make them privy to secret knowledge that their less informed peers lack. My "vitriol" is based on a lifelong desire to understand and know the pre-contact peoples of the Andes. I have studied them as an amateur for many years. I would like to share some of this pleasure with a few others; instead I am inundated with people who uncritically accept and doggedly defend anyone who can get them wet between the legs with theories that implicitly denigrate and deny the reality of an amazing and fascinating - and truly mysterious - people. More, I am repelled by the mental and spiritual torpor that make humans look to demons and angels for their sense of wonder, because they are too lazy to look at the immense wonders of biology, physics, math, history - biology alone is astounding in its complexity and synchronisation. Astronomy? Can any UFO sighting (and I am not ready to reject them all) be as soul-shaking as what you are really looking at when you gaze at a starry sky? The numbers? Science itself is a crazy story - the fact that physics knows that it is at its most basic, wrong? Gravity and electromagnetism are both proven true, yet they cannot coexist in this universe as it is understood? The fact that we know nothing, not one single fact exists in science, all is assumptions? Epistemology eats its own tail. Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum? I love the Inkas. I came to Peru to live among them and every morning that I wake and walk out my door I am fascinated anew. I live for the moments I can almost see them building those walls. I look for what they really are and I despise those who knowingly distort and slander them for the admiration of willfully duped fools. "I can remember being told by sober professors that the dinosaurs died of some pandemic and wooly mammoths were hunted to extinction by a few tribes of humans and Neanderthals were a bunch of hunched-over grunting savages, ideas that would bring gales of laughter today." Yeh. I would rather not believe in feathered dinosaurs. You mean the extinction of mammoths was not brought on by humans? Huh. I didn't know that.
the quarry from the other side of the mountain across the river , only start of explanation is they were hoover strait across the gorge with anti-gravity lifting pods
Any details on the statue of the WARRIOR near the end? I have never been to Peru but to 30 sites in MX, Guatemala, Venezuela (35 years ago), and Belize. Many times there were these STATUES with no plaque to commemorate an "obvious" hero or liberator. In Colima MX. (fabulous little town), there was a massive statue of COLIMAN THE CONQUEROR who defeated the Spanish.
He's probably supposed to be Manco, the rebel Inca who defeated the conquistador Pedro Pizarro and his cavalry and Indian allies in front of the town. His outfit is totally fantasy, not authentic.
The oldest constructions with the biggest and hardest stones that we find on our planet are made by the highest skilled and educated civilization that vanished about 20,000 years ago because of a recurring natural disaster. And that civilization knew that they would vanish for a very large part. They constructed Machu Picchu and other places high in the mountains to help a selected group to survive the disaster that causes an enormous tidal wave, earthquakes, volcano eruptions and a bombardment of fiery meteorites. To learn more about the cycle of civilizations and its timeline, recurring floods and ancient high tech, read the e-book: Planet 9 = Nibiru. You can read it nicely on any computer, tablet or smartphone. Just search for: invisible nibiru 9
Are you kidding? Europeans of all kinds mercilessly killed or subjugated native peoples all over the Americas. It was ALL horrible, including in N. America. BTW, the video is about Peru.
@@etherealenergy9471 , I have no idea what you could be thinking. No other country has treated native people worse than we have. Then we brought slaves here. No excuses for us. We totally suck.
@@---Dana---- What they don't tell you is that the leaders of those african tribes sold their own people to the slave owners. I live here, but not apart of what happened in the past. It is awful what happened though.
@@etherealenergy9471 , We all know Africans captured and sold their enemies into slavery, because they were paid to do so by Europeans. That in no way changes anything. What we did was wrong and black people still suffer from the legacy of slavery and racism. If you are white, you have privilege at the expense of others.
Well amazing video I feel like I just left there love that area so much history thank you for sharing God bless
Think you could hold the picture fore than half a second.. I feel like I'm just driving by on the freeway
Desde Mexico, Te agradezco por este video. Preciosa la musica, bello paisaje. Hermosa la gente de Peru. Dios bendiga este pais lindo y bello ❤❤🇲🇽🇲🇽 4-25-2021
Definitely a fascinating & cleverly innovative race of people who obviously found something built earlier by an ancient group of people & simply built on that.
Don't listen to that BS. The Incas "obviously" built their own stuff from the ground up. I live in Ollantaytambo and can see every stage of construction all around. Guys like Brien Foerster may have believed their foolishness when they were young and ignorant, but by now he has been consciously lying for decades.
@@adamseward4713 No way. Something definitely predated them but they did do fascinating work.
@@edwardanthony7283 Many cultures predated the Inca, but none of them built in megalithic stone (except the Chavin), and none of them provided the foundations for the Inca structures. Those were all pure Inca. If you come here I can show yoiu stones in every phase of masonry from raw andesite to polished workmanship.
@@adamseward4713 I'm in USA but I believe the megalithic works were already there & the Inca built on them & also recycled some of it.
@@edwardanthony7283 Based on what? Divine revelation? Or the videos of that uneducated con artist Foerster? Never mind. All the professional historians and archaeologists just laugh and ignore all that and so will I. Good luck outrunning Darwin.
There's quite a lot of pre-Inca megalithic stonework in this video. Amazing stuff.
Wanted to explore on those steps in Ollantaytambo but our tour guide took us to see Peruvian kitchen and Guinea pigs. This town that we got on the train to Machu Picchu. Love Peru.
Worth a visit - maybe next time - but it's all special!
Come on back. I'll give you a free and informed tour of all the local archaeological sites.
Come on back. Entrence is free now and the weather is fine.
Old civilisation long before the Inkas.
Bet you think they white, too
@@adamseward4713 unlikely.
Divno mjesto , ija ču živjeti sličnim životom kao i ovi Ljudi . Ostanite živjeti gore na mjestu kao i vaši stari ☺🖒
Nice photos, but they went by too fast.
Thanks for the feedback
Wow!! What we could of learnt from these people. Astonishing!! They built aqua ducs like the Romans almost. Intelligent people!!
so much good stuff ,,... uff ...
Inca stumbled across these ruins and then built on top of them, it's visible everywhere you look. Anyone who still perpetuates this obvious lie that the Inca built all of it should be embarrassed and ridiculed into obscurity and shame.
You should be embarrassed. You are either an ignoramus, an imbecile, or a conscious liar.
@@adamseward4713 There are a lot of unanswered questions such as why are the finer quality works below the later lesser quality ones. Also, the general consensus is that the Incas arrived in the 12 th century and were conquered in the 16th century, so all of these constructions must have been completed in a 4 century span. But construction is not instant, all technology derives from prior technologies as it gains sophistication, and we don't see a progression from primitive to modern in these sites, they appear to have just sprung forth instantly. I think some folks with knowledge of construction and society could make an educated guess as to the viability of a population that was agrarian, which requires long days of toil in the fields, finding sufficient free time and skilled workers to complete all these works.
@@oldschool1993 Actually, current theory has it that almost all of the Inka architecture was constructed in less than a century. That's believable, the Inkas had a functionally infinite labor force, a genius for organization and efficiency, superb engineers, and worked hard. I watched pure-blood day laborers carrying 20 kilo sacks of freshly harvested choclo maize on their back at a dead run; the woman I was with said, "It's like we're watching Inkas work,:" and she was right.
However, it is true, there's not much evidence of the evolution of Inka masonry - it is as if it sprung up whole from one mind during the reign of Pachacutiq. Maybe it did, he was a creative genius. At any rate, there's no indication of a preceding culture developing that unique style of stonework. The Tiwanakans may have influenced them but their styles are definitely, if subtly to the untrained eye, unalike. I suspect that the architecture grew more gradually in the Cuzco valley than is currently. theorized. Archeology, paleoanthropology, paleontology, can only expand backwards in time, and that is what it does.
It is one of many puzzles left by a people whose literature was knotted strings, whose libraries were systematically destroyed by the church, and for which there is no Rosetta Stone. But it is clear by the great stones left behind in a seamless progression of stages from raw rock to fine finished masonry that each building was constructed by the same people, architects, engineers, straw bosses, and *hatun runakuna,* from the ground up. No Old Ones of Lemuria, no alien technology, and no 20,000 year-old Lost Advanced Civilizations of little Brien Foersters, Graham Hancocks, Michael Cremos, or DH Childresses are necessary to explain anything.
@@adamseward4713 Well you do give a good argument in support of current theory, and it is a clue as to why your response to the original poster was so vitriolic. I am not a proponent of aliens or lost civilizations either, but I am open to reasonable questions regarding these constructions. I have been around long enough to know that the greatest impediment to scientific advancement has always been the supporters of the currently accepted theory. Going back to Galileo, Schliemann, the Leakeys, the Alvarez' and many many more, the one consistent fact is that every one of them were attacked and ridiculed by the established scientific community. It is quite understandable that a person that studied and devoted his life to teaching something that he believed as fact would be reluctant to toss it all away in the face of new facts or theories. I can remember being told by sober professors that the dinosaurs died of some pandemic and wooly mammoths were hunted to extinction by a few tribes of humans and Neanderthals were a bunch of hunched-over grunting savages, ideas that would bring gales of laughter today.
@@oldschool1993 Institutional conservatism is the second obstacle to scientific discovery. That is based on the desire to preserve the credibility of the tradition, just as the Vatican is reluctant to canonize a potato that looks like the Virgin Mary and sheds tears: they don't want to be laughed at or sneered at or abandoned for validating ten thousand ridiculous claims.
The first obstacle to scientific advancement is popular opinion, which, on one hand, is conservative in clinging to "common sense" (the wild crazy theory of their great grandparents' time) and on the other, the primordial desire to believe in the fantastic and sensational. Not long ago demons and evil spirits fought with saints and angels over the daily lives of peasants. But more commonly in these times, people just want someone to thrill them, to excite them, to make them privy to secret knowledge that their less informed peers lack.
My "vitriol" is based on a lifelong desire to understand and know the pre-contact peoples of the Andes. I have studied them as an amateur for many years. I would like to share some of this pleasure with a few others; instead I am inundated with people who uncritically accept and doggedly defend anyone who can get them wet between the legs with theories that implicitly denigrate and deny the reality of an amazing and fascinating - and truly mysterious - people.
More, I am repelled by the mental and spiritual torpor that make humans look to demons and angels for their sense of wonder, because they are too lazy to look at the immense wonders of biology, physics, math, history - biology alone is astounding in its complexity and synchronisation. Astronomy? Can any UFO sighting (and I am not ready to reject them all) be as soul-shaking as what you are really looking at when you gaze at a starry sky? The numbers? Science itself is a crazy story - the fact that physics knows that it is at its most basic, wrong? Gravity and electromagnetism are both proven true, yet they cannot coexist in this universe as it is understood? The fact that we know nothing, not one single fact exists in science, all is assumptions? Epistemology eats its own tail. Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum?
I love the Inkas. I came to Peru to live among them and every morning that I wake and walk out my door I am fascinated anew. I live for the moments I can almost see them building those walls.
I look for what they really are and I despise those who knowingly distort and slander them for the admiration of willfully duped fools.
"I can remember being told by sober professors that the dinosaurs died of some pandemic and wooly mammoths were hunted to extinction by a few tribes of humans and Neanderthals were a bunch of hunched-over grunting savages, ideas that would bring gales of laughter today."
Yeh. I would rather not believe in feathered dinosaurs. You mean the extinction of mammoths was not brought on by humans? Huh. I didn't know that.
Exactly how were those stones brought from a nearby quarry?
the quarry from the other side of the mountain across the river , only start of explanation is they were hoover strait across the gorge with anti-gravity lifting pods
Terrified slaves are really strong
😍
AMERICA: Linda y Preciosa!
Any details on the statue of the WARRIOR near the end? I have never been to Peru but to 30 sites in MX, Guatemala, Venezuela (35 years ago), and Belize. Many times there were these STATUES with no plaque to commemorate an "obvious" hero or liberator. In Colima MX. (fabulous little town), there was a massive statue of COLIMAN THE CONQUEROR who defeated the Spanish.
He's probably supposed to be Manco, the rebel Inca who defeated the conquistador Pedro Pizarro and his cavalry and Indian allies in front of the town. His outfit is totally fantasy, not authentic.
The oldest constructions with the biggest and hardest stones that we find on our planet are made by the highest skilled and educated civilization that vanished about 20,000 years ago because of a recurring natural disaster. And that civilization knew that they would vanish for a very large part. They constructed Machu Picchu and other places high in the mountains to help a selected group to survive the disaster that causes an enormous tidal wave, earthquakes, volcano eruptions and a bombardment of fiery meteorites. To learn more about the cycle of civilizations and its timeline, recurring floods and ancient high tech, read the e-book: Planet 9 = Nibiru. You can read it nicely on any computer, tablet or smartphone. Just search for: invisible nibiru 9
The Inca didn't just disappear they were deceived into thinking their space gods would save them instead they were captured, and tortured.
Not Inca
Inka. Cover your ears and go LALALALALALALA.
@@adamseward4713 troll troll. Go back sleep troll, Adam Seaward.
Not the stuff underneath, no. Clearly two different types of stonework. It's not even arguable, IMO. The Inca construction on top is much cruder.
Nice, but two second cuts are way too short. Four seconds is minimum. Watch the advertisements on TV.
Thanks for the feedback.
How come we feel sorry for people of Mexico when they treated their native people so much worse thane we did ours?
Are you kidding? Europeans of all kinds mercilessly killed or subjugated native peoples all over the Americas. It was ALL horrible, including in N. America. BTW, the video is about Peru.
@@---Dana---- Not all Europeans did that some came here to escape what ever they were escaping in their own country.
@@etherealenergy9471 , I have no idea what you could be thinking. No other country has treated native people worse than we have. Then we brought slaves here. No excuses for us. We totally suck.
@@---Dana---- What they don't tell you is that the leaders of those african tribes sold their own people to the slave owners. I live here, but not apart of what happened in the past. It is awful what happened though.
@@etherealenergy9471 , We all know Africans captured and sold their enemies into slavery, because they were paid to do so by Europeans. That in no way changes anything. What we did was wrong and black people still suffer from the legacy of slavery and racism. If you are white, you have privilege at the expense of others.
The Spanish never found this place i believe.
The Spaniards did so find Ollantaytambo. It is Machu Picchu that they didn't find.