How Mazda Is Saving The Gasoline Engine - SkyActiv-X

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 лют 2018
  • How Mazda's Revolutionary SkyActiv-X SPCCI Engine Works
    EE Shirts! - bit.ly/2BHsiuo
    Recommended Books & Car Products - amzn.to/2BrekJm
    Subscribe for new videos every Wednesday! - goo.gl/VZstk7
    The ideal otto engine is something you may learn about in an introductory course of thermodynamics. It teaches important lessons about thermal efficiency, and it's the ultimate unachievable goal of every engineer who's ever worked on internal combustion development.
    But that certainly doesn't stop Mazda from trying. With their eyes set on the the ideal engine, they made changes from their SkyActiv-G engine to improve thermal efficiency in seven key areas. Most importantly, it's the world's first production implementation of compression ignition in a gasoline engine. More specifically, compression ignition timed with a spark plug: SPCCI. In this video we'll break down Mazda's SkyActiv-X engine, and talk about four of the major improvements they've made in pursuit of the ideal engine.
    Engineering Explained is a participant in the Amazon Influencer Program.
    Don't forget to check out my other pages below!
    Facebook: / engineeringexplained
    Official Website: www.howdoesacarwork.com
    Twitter: / jasonfenske13
    Instagram: / engineeringexplained
    Car Throttle: www.carthrottle.com/user/engi...
    Amazon: www.amazon.com/shop/engineeri...
    EE Extra: / @engineeringexplainede...
    NEW VIDEO EVERY WEDNESDAY!
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,5 тис.

  • @EngineeringExplained
    @EngineeringExplained  6 років тому +1059

    For those with a very keen eye, you’ll notice that in the EPA fuel economy charts (0:45) Hyundai had the highest number in 2013, which goes against the claim of Mazda having the best fuel economy for five years straight. This is because in 2013 Hyundai was under investigation by the EPA for claiming fuel economy numbers that were too high, so they were disqualified. Hope everyone's having a great day! :)
    Instagram: instagram.com/engineeringexplained
    EE Shirts: teespring.com/stores/engineeringexplained

    • @rkenny1887
      @rkenny1887 6 років тому +29

      Engineering Explained E-superchargers and the benefits of the 48v system... next please

    • @michalisfotiadis4711
      @michalisfotiadis4711 6 років тому +29

      Engineering Explained The ratio is lit A/F 💯

    • @mandernachluca3774
      @mandernachluca3774 6 років тому +6

      I have a slight problem with your explanation on NOx emissions. I was taught that this very lean mixture would lead to high levels of NOx because there is just a small area around the sparkplug that burns with an optimal air-fuel-ratio ( the german word for this procedure would be "Schichtladungsbetrieb"). I thought that was the reason why they abandoned this concept for direct injected gasoline engines.

    • @BigR376
      @BigR376 6 років тому +28

      Engineering Explained if I'm not mistaken CAFE standards apply to all retail vehicles produced by the automaker. Mazda doesn't make large SUVs or pickup trucks like many of the other automakers. Nor do they currently make a high performance sports car like a mustang or corvette. I think it's a little unfair for them to make the claim of having the Highest CAFE because it's an unfair comparison.

    • @joaob.almeida5176
      @joaob.almeida5176 6 років тому +8

      Dude, loved the video, just want to know a little thing.
      Most cars in Brazil run on engines that take both ethanol and gasoline as fuel sometimes a mix of both and most of gasoline here has ethanol mixed in it because of law. How much of this could be applied to a ethanol/flex engine without a big research and testing cicle?

  • @mqbitsko25
    @mqbitsko25 6 років тому +476

    Mazda has no cowards in their engineering department. Respect!
    They've always been that way. Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't.

    • @cat-em3mj
      @cat-em3mj 4 роки тому +34

      Yea remember when they used to make rotary engines? They always try to be different

    • @filthyvibes4768
      @filthyvibes4768 4 роки тому +24

      cat remember when they won lemans with the rotary?

    • @filthyvibes4768
      @filthyvibes4768 4 роки тому

      Not Hitler most raced car in history

    • @mutt8553
      @mutt8553 4 роки тому

      Filthy Vibes the 787b is other worldly

    • @boho1926
      @boho1926 4 роки тому

      The speed3. The turbo Miata.

  • @TrevorDyck
    @TrevorDyck 6 років тому +733

    This is why I love Mazda. Maximum efficiency, reliability, fun to drive, and affordable - all at the same time.

    • @gewdvibes
      @gewdvibes 5 років тому +32

      Sapphire Spire how do you know how reliable it is when there’s 0 production cars on the road with this engine right now?

    • @gewdvibes
      @gewdvibes 5 років тому +46

      Sapphire Spire Mazda’s Skyactiv-G engines have high compression as well yet they’ve been pretty bulletproof since 2013, so...

    • @jackd1582
      @jackd1582 4 роки тому +1

      @Sapphire Spire Spot on Dude ✓✓✓✓

    • @sjgavenger37
      @sjgavenger37 4 роки тому +34

      @Sapphire Spire
      Well we had a 2013 cx-5 with the skyactiv-g engine go over 350,000 miles with no issues. When I say we I mean I am a technician at a Mazda dealership and we have had no issues with anything internal on the skyactiv engines. Now we had a few Ford engines from 2010 throw rods but no issues from the skyactiv technology platforms.

    • @P00PJackel
      @P00PJackel 4 роки тому

      Affordable? The prototype is ten million us dollars....

  • @elimalinsky7069
    @elimalinsky7069 5 років тому +454

    So basically, treating a gasoline engine as if it was a diesel engine. Pretty cool.
    It's actually amazing how much you can improve a 140 year old technology.

    • @C_R_O_M________
      @C_R_O_M________ 4 роки тому +8

      OFC! When something's around for ages a huge number of set of eyes are going to stare at is and some of them will eventually improve the design.

    • @GrockleTD
      @GrockleTD 3 роки тому

      as i recall they did something similar with their Diesel engines as well back in ~2013

    • @lockinhinddanger934
      @lockinhinddanger934 2 роки тому +2

      To be fair, how much have we improved fire?

    • @clayz1
      @clayz1 2 роки тому

      Modern electronics, faster than a flame front.

    • @Mr.Marbles
      @Mr.Marbles Рік тому

      @@clayz1 yes. but the batteries are still not there yet.

  • @yuanwang8021
    @yuanwang8021 4 роки тому +192

    Mazda circle: make good car to earn money, research rotary engine, need more money, make good car to earn money...
    Other circles: stop...

    • @keithw4920
      @keithw4920 4 роки тому +19

      Other circles : Make SUVS and Crossovers

    • @mayuravirus6134
      @mayuravirus6134 4 роки тому +6

      Making inline 6 on top of that becaue Toyota turned to coochie that had been overused

  • @Butterffinger5678
    @Butterffinger5678 6 років тому +1750

    "Extreme compression, supercharged engine, knock, and with a lean air-to-fuel mixture-it cannot be done!"
    Mazda: "Hold my beer."

    • @LP640PR
      @LP640PR 6 років тому +89

      Butterffinger5678 and achieve 190hp while they're at it

    • @MrJarvisful
      @MrJarvisful 6 років тому +13

      LP640PR that sounds so low for a triple I engine. I guess technically it's a 3 cylinder

    • @dylanmontgomerie6069
      @dylanmontgomerie6069 6 років тому +7

      Sounds like a diesel.

    • @richardprice5978
      @richardprice5978 6 років тому +25

      Butterffinger5678 sounds like the most important part it the controllers and sensors aka it’s possible to convert older engines with some upgrades like the pressure sensors and a ecu swap

    • @devilsadvocate2548
      @devilsadvocate2548 6 років тому +36

      Richard Price it requires more than just pressure sensors and ECU swaps, there is so much more to it than that. Unless the engine you're taking about also has variable valve timing and duration that can allow it to operate on an Atkinson cycle the engine wouldn't work at higher rpm. Plus you'd also have to modify the internals to allow for a much higher commission ratio. About all you'd be able to keep is the block!

  • @carswithcolin
    @carswithcolin 5 років тому +212

    And enthusiasts can breathe another day cause you know Mazda will offer a manual with this engine

    • @mayuravirus6134
      @mayuravirus6134 4 роки тому +6

      And Inline 6 on top of that and Toyota said its hard to make an Inline 6 but they can make another V8 for lexus

    • @zachfabbian1441
      @zachfabbian1441 4 роки тому +3

      @@mayuravirus6134 let's just bring back the 2jz 😂😂😂

    • @JoshuaTootell
      @JoshuaTootell 3 роки тому

      Unfortunately, most of their cars seem to not have a manual though 🥺

  • @garrettz.6857
    @garrettz.6857 6 років тому +121

    Doing a research paper on the topic of Mazda's tech, this video was a huge help! Most comprehensive explanation of this technology I've seen.

    • @ShogunAutoworks
      @ShogunAutoworks 3 роки тому +1

      Ohhhh you're gonna LOVE this channel then!

    • @sOleBookwood
      @sOleBookwood 2 місяці тому

      Cool!! Is it possible to read your paper?

  • @peppa1492
    @peppa1492 4 роки тому +39

    I knew Mazda was good, but I never knew that it was that good. I'm so glad that those engines will be there with us for quite some time!

  • @JustAnOrdinaryBrick
    @JustAnOrdinaryBrick 6 років тому +257

    This is 1 of your best video's you've ever made. You explained everyting exceptionally well!

    • @EngineeringExplained
      @EngineeringExplained  6 років тому +26

      Thanks Brick!

    • @DavidBrown-ud7dn
      @DavidBrown-ud7dn 6 років тому

      JustAnOrdinaryBrick a

    • @jaybird4915
      @jaybird4915 6 років тому +2

      Here, here. I will second that. Explanation was excellent, I am very intrigued. Can't wait to test drive one of these myself.

    • @_BangDroid_
      @_BangDroid_ 6 років тому

      Bloody Oath!

  • @Txepsiyu
    @Txepsiyu 6 років тому +160

    This is possibly one of the best descriptive videos I have ever seen. Well done.

  • @fredrutledge3628
    @fredrutledge3628 4 роки тому +31

    I thought my Toyota RAV4 was just the best thing, but now I see that the Mazda boys are right on top of the engineering for the near future.

  • @jrherita
    @jrherita 6 років тому +33

    "About 190 horsepower" is about 90 more horsepower than I was expecting. This sounds like an awesome engine! Great rundown EE!

    • @Zentrify
      @Zentrify 11 місяців тому

      How tf are you expecting less than 150hp from a naturally aspirated 2.0

    • @mikhailjairnisbett441
      @mikhailjairnisbett441 10 місяців тому +3

      @@Zentrify My car is a 3.8L and makes 190...

  • @mikeyiscoolable
    @mikeyiscoolable 6 років тому +341

    I wish my calculus professor could teach as well as you lol. Great video

    • @EngineeringExplained
      @EngineeringExplained  6 років тому +14

      Thanks!

    • @jackallen6261
      @jackallen6261 6 років тому

      Check out Prof Leonard's calculus videos .

    • @Aseutester
      @Aseutester 6 років тому

      Rekt communist So preoccupied with Sophistry(to undermine Western Civilisation!) instead of teaching!!

  • @zokusharuuku1091
    @zokusharuuku1091 6 років тому +32

    This video was actually really interesting because of how mazda is changing the rule book and efficiency of gasoline engines by doing everything that everyone thought was wrong. 1 supercharger- usually you add more fuel but they do the opposite. 2 higher compression with forced induction. The ideal 14.1 air fuel ratio is way different to their 37.1. Im actually really interested in what mazda is doing which is the first time i actually wanted to know more about a mazda engine.

  • @rfldss89
    @rfldss89 5 років тому +190

    imagine if they brought out a smaller engine (90-100HP at 1-1.5L for example) with this tech in the EU. They would sell like hotcakes.

    • @dwergmaster
      @dwergmaster 4 роки тому +8

      like cross-overs

    • @zondaboy6493
      @zondaboy6493 2 роки тому +4

      No they wouldn't.

    • @mrdesmit6038
      @mrdesmit6038 2 роки тому

      @@zondaboy6493 why?

    • @hughdennison3013
      @hughdennison3013 Рік тому +3

      Yeah or put this one in a multi purpose lightweight pickup like the old navara... hot cakes in Asia Africa South America and northern europe

    • @GaryTheRCcar
      @GaryTheRCcar 5 місяців тому +1

      They just did, the mazda 2

  • @robertmcdermond1692
    @robertmcdermond1692 6 років тому +25

    Would love to see you delve into the Opposed-piston engine being developed by Achates. They are predicting 37 MPG combined for an F-150 with one of their engines.

  • @boots_n_coots
    @boots_n_coots 6 років тому +172

    So many variables! My poor little brain's check engine light went red about halfway through. Good presentation tho, thank you.

  • @ericb.4358
    @ericb.4358 4 роки тому +16

    Speaking as a teacher I can say with authority that you need to be teaching at an engineering university. Your explanations are clear, sequential and very easy to understand. Thank you.

  • @kryptkeeper457
    @kryptkeeper457 6 років тому +1

    i am a flight instructor, and i have used many of your videos as teaching aids. especially the wet vs dry sump oil systems, and some other videos that explain the 4 strokes, as well as your fuel octanes explanation videos and turbo vs superchargers, the list goes on.
    excellent content, and really great teaching aids!
    awesome drawings and explanations.
    thank you so much!

  • @marijunamissle
    @marijunamissle 6 років тому +71

    Finally mazda getting the recognition they deserve ❤️

    • @zdenekkindl2778
      @zdenekkindl2778 2 місяці тому

      It may end up like their 2.2L diesel…

  • @formelekandscreen
    @formelekandscreen 6 років тому +410

    190hp combined with insane fuel economy? I'd swap my engine if I could afford it.

    • @BigHeadClan
      @BigHeadClan 6 років тому +28

      Aye 190HP and clearing nearly 33MPG combined is pretty awesome , I'm waiting to see if Infiniti throws there new VC-T engine in the Nissan Altima to see how it compares
      to something like the Madza 3/6.

    • @renegerritsen6178
      @renegerritsen6178 6 років тому +9

      Same here. I have a 2.3 turbo engine in my Saab 9-5. I love the turbo effect, but fuel efficient is not exactly what I'd call this engine ;) OK, it is 20 years old, but it only has 170hp and is plenty fast compared to most other traffic on the road.

    • @BigHeadClan
      @BigHeadClan 6 років тому +2

      Oh yeah my old man almost snagged an 02 Saab 9-3 Vector back in the day, he ended up going with a 3.5 Altima but I always through it was a sweet car.

    • @aMoldyUsagi
      @aMoldyUsagi 6 років тому +5

      Rene - You have the low pressure turbo version I take it? I always thought those were pretty decent in fuel economy, atleast for the time..
      I have an 02 Saab 9-3 SE with the 2.0L high output turbo that has a light tune to 250hp and it is a ton of fun.. It actually gets decent mileage on the highway, but really suffers in the city.. Engines have really come a long way in terms of fuel efficiency in the last 20 years it seems.

    • @BrianNC81
      @BrianNC81 6 років тому +7

      190hp is pretty weak. 250hp would be my bare minimum considered when buying a car.

  • @crocosnz3322
    @crocosnz3322 6 років тому +1

    Just want to say I love your enthusiasm and the way you take people through things step by step without being patronizing. Thanks!

  • @njm3211
    @njm3211 6 років тому +7

    Great video. This is the Swan song of the ICE. Reminds me of all the refinements made to steam locomotives just as railways were switching to diesel electric.

  • @Corrosion37
    @Corrosion37 6 років тому +530

    Mazda has to make up for all the Rotary engines spewing fuel out of the exhaust for all these years.

    • @udithdilshan4839
      @udithdilshan4839 6 років тому +7

      Corrosion37 true af. Thts wht i thought too.

    • @mercury9060
      @mercury9060 6 років тому +30

      No it spews oil not fuel if I’m correct in my knowledge

    • @Earthesion
      @Earthesion 6 років тому +48

      TheElementalSponges The fact being referenced is that rotary engines have worse mpg in general. Rotary burns oil as a matter of course as well

    • @mauricevandoeselaar
      @mauricevandoeselaar 6 років тому +4

      Yes all those ! rotary engines. How many?

    • @maltepettersson3083
      @maltepettersson3083 6 років тому +27

      though they sound good af!

  • @Suction_
    @Suction_ 6 років тому +27

    Love my SkyActiv-G - No freaking CVTs here... Mazda FTW

  • @r.c.salyer3652
    @r.c.salyer3652 Рік тому

    Thanks for making this very detailed video of the new Mazda Engine. I"ve seen others, that were not so complete, so I had a lot of questions. After watching your version - now I get it!

  • @RobWhittlestone
    @RobWhittlestone 6 років тому +2

    ANOTHER BRILLIANT VIDEO, Jason! VERY EXCITING what Mazda is doing! THANK YOU for explaining it SO WELL! Greetings from Switzerland, Rob (Also it makes me proud to be a Mazda (MX-5 NC) owner!)

  • @Striball
    @Striball 6 років тому +102

    Mazda is basically at the forefront with internal combustion engines. Makes me proud of owning Mazda products!

    • @jasonmcmillan4373
      @jasonmcmillan4373 6 років тому +12

      Striball Absolutely correct. If not for all the green subsidies electric cars and renewables technology wouldn't even be able to get its foot in the door. Last time I checked the rare and precious metals mined from the earth to make the worlds most efficient batteries aren't exactly in abundant supply (unlike coal and oil) either. The world is looking in all the wrong places for it's 'answers'. But not Mazda. Evolution, not revolution, and engineering of ever greater efficiency for the internal combustion engine.

    • @gabrieliacoboni6951
      @gabrieliacoboni6951 5 років тому +1

      Damn straight.

    • @gewdvibes
      @gewdvibes 5 років тому +1

      Jason McMillan batteries have the capability to be made from clean renewable materials. Lithium and other metals aren’t absolutely required to make batteries. That’s the thing about electric cars, they have the capability to be 100% environmentally friendly, something ICE engines will NEVER be able to achieve. It’s literally impossible, but it is POSSIBLE with electric cars. Eventually electric cars will be able to be manufactured in clean factories with 100% renewable materials and battery packs will be manufactured with 100% renewable materials and the electricity used to charge said batteries can be sourced from 100% renewable sources

    • @doorguner01
      @doorguner01 5 років тому +3

      @@gewdvibes You're living in a fantasy world!

    • @gewdvibes
      @gewdvibes 5 років тому +1

      terry jenkins not really, there’s entire states that are 100% renewable already

  • @prometheus575
    @prometheus575 6 років тому +128

    Without fail, yet another AWESOME video from EE (and I have been a subscriber for years)! As always, can't wait for the next one. My mouse is worn from the "like" button lol.
    Keep them coming!

  • @Slowyourrollvarietyshow
    @Slowyourrollvarietyshow 3 роки тому +4

    Hey Jason, I know this is an older video, but just wanted to give you a big thank you for such incredible presentations of valuable information. Every video feels like a college course, and for someone that could never afford higher education, just wanted to say thanks man

  • @dsbennett
    @dsbennett Рік тому

    I just bought a new CX-5 and I didn't understand anything about the engine. I thought the turbo was just to make up for the wimpy engine, but now I understand it's more for making the engine more efficient. This makes me very happy to understand all this. Excellent explanation. Thanks.

  • @WhittyPics
    @WhittyPics 6 років тому +434

    The biggest mistake Ford Motor made was breaking it's partnership with Mazda. Ford couldn't make a decent small car until they partnered with Mazda.

    • @FXIIBeaver
      @FXIIBeaver 6 років тому +15

      Dennis W not really. They just copied mazdas blueprints and boom. However new engines that aren't 2.3 are garbage.

    • @cha7260
      @cha7260 6 років тому +25

      yep, their 2.3 ecoboost looks so similar to the mazda disi 2.3, though everything was stamped FOMOCO in the mazda.

    • @djtravisseuren9435
      @djtravisseuren9435 6 років тому +4

      The old fords w mazda engines were the best, pretty much all the gt models besides mustangs, probe, escort...

    • @Dongzzzzzz
      @Dongzzzzzz 6 років тому +3

      travis seuren your statement proves that Ford can't make good engines.

    • @jimmelay71
      @jimmelay71 6 років тому +4

      Some would argue Ford hasn't made a good one since the partnership ended either. The Festiva is an embarrassment.

  • @Top10girl
    @Top10girl 6 років тому +51

    Love your videos man. Thank you for uploading this!

  • @1911indi
    @1911indi 6 років тому

    It is just absolutely beautiful to see you explain it so simply on your whiteboards...wish you lotso success as always ,,,, waitin for the next one as are all !!!

  • @Ryan57Garr
    @Ryan57Garr 6 років тому +11

    Go Mazda! They’ve always been my favorite cars I’ve owned. Fun, affordable, and economical. You really can’t ask for more from a daily driver!

  • @carl_84
    @carl_84 6 років тому +100

    190hp Miata and more fuel efficient? Take my money!!!

    • @69ER509
      @69ER509 5 років тому +2

      oh yeah huh. I wonder if this fits in my miata

    • @Kildaer
      @Kildaer 5 років тому +5

      @@69ER509 It should, the ND1 have an aftermarket supercharger that works, so the new ecocharger could be crammed in there.
      Really the dream for the miata would be a rotary SkyActiv-x engine; as from what I can tell from the miata forum, is that the ND are hard to improve/have not had the time needed to perfectly map out ways to improve performance. We would probably expect similar/slightly worse efficiency to the current miata, but engine displacement would get a lot bigger.

    • @gewdvibes
      @gewdvibes 5 років тому +1

      JV the changes you would have to make trying to retrofit that engine would probably cost more than the car itself

  • @ChaosPootato
    @ChaosPootato 6 років тому +135

    Man I like Mazda. They're cool cats

  • @andresferrer7628
    @andresferrer7628 5 років тому +8

    I can’t believe I actually understood everything you said. You’re awesome.

  • @mckiller99Br
    @mckiller99Br 6 років тому +1

    man your english is very good to understand, i'm brazillian and not fully learned english and i understand clearly all of your videos and help me a lot with my college.

  • @JaZoN_XD
    @JaZoN_XD 6 років тому +11

    Wow. as a fuel economy geek, i am super stoked.

  • @bofty
    @bofty 6 років тому +3

    I've always wondered about the skyactiv engines, great video and very well explained. Cheers!

  • @MrAdamSavage
    @MrAdamSavage 6 років тому

    A straightforward yet detailed explanation, thank you!

  • @MrSlash00r
    @MrSlash00r 6 років тому +8

    Another reason why we'll mourn the loss of the IC engine - its just so damn cool. Great vid man.

  • @waydigga1982
    @waydigga1982 6 років тому +42

    I assume that test engine is a 2.0L...Not bad if it makes 190hp. Thats 35hp more than the current engine while still being cleaner and fuel efficient....Also a few hp more than the current 2.5L.

    • @EngineeringExplained
      @EngineeringExplained  6 років тому +13

      Yes, 2.0L.

    • @arijfroo
      @arijfroo 6 років тому +2

      I was wondering this the whole time. You should put a pop-up thingy on the video that mentions this.

    • @DoublePortalInc
      @DoublePortalInc 6 років тому +3

      It is supercharged tho

    • @DeathBringer769
      @DeathBringer769 6 років тому +3

      Yup, it's pretty damn good for a small, efficient engine that is using the supercharger NOT solely for extra power here.

    • @namasayanif
      @namasayanif 5 років тому +1

      It doesn't add more fuel with the extra air though, like how you would use a supercharger normally. It's only to lean out the AFR.

  • @michor10
    @michor10 6 років тому

    Excellent video. Thank's for sharing this. I wonder if this ever makes it to production.

  • @HSMiyamoto
    @HSMiyamoto 6 років тому

    This was a fantastic lecture, all done without memorization, I presume. Fantastic!

  • @goatslayerwp
    @goatslayerwp 6 років тому +60

    You are very intelligent and I love the way you explain everything. I've always been curious as to what your education background is and if you work/have worked in the automotive industry. Care to share? Just wondering how my go-to guy for explaining new automotive technology ended up doing such an awesome job at it.

    • @EngineeringExplained
      @EngineeringExplained  6 років тому +37

      I appreciate the kind words! I went to school for Mechanical Engineering at NCSU, and then worked briefly as an application engineer and then a test engineer for a forklift company. Forklifts are a lot like cars, they're just way heavier and use don't require quite as much modern tech as a car. From a powertrain standpoint though, efficiency is equally important.

    • @nc3826
      @nc3826 6 років тому +3

      Interesting and ironic since forklifts are one of the few types of vehicle where it already makes economic sense to us batteries or even FC in instead of an ICE.

    • @EngineeringExplained
      @EngineeringExplained  6 років тому +16

      Yes, the company I worked for made gas, diesel, LPG, CNG, electric, and fuel cell vehicles. Whatever the customer wants, and yes, electric made up a large percentage of sales.

    • @nc3826
      @nc3826 6 років тому +4

      Any hybrids? I doubt it due to cost, but I can think a few scenarios were it would be useful. And thx for taking the time to respond.

    • @EngineeringExplained
      @EngineeringExplained  6 років тому +14

      Yes actually. When I was a test engineer I worked directly on hybrid development.

  • @harsh8986
    @harsh8986 6 років тому +2

    Amazing video Jason! With Skyactiv-X, cars will be more fun to drive and efficient. Can't wait for this with the Miata combination!!!

  • @HazMat1012
    @HazMat1012 6 років тому

    I loved the 3D portion of the video showing the combustion/ignition in the cylinder. It helps with your white board drawings.

  • @bekemark10
    @bekemark10 6 років тому +47

    I wonder how this engine will hold up in the long run, when carbon starts to build up inside. With such a precisely made engine maybe some carbon buildup will mess everything up. Hope not.

    • @pescepattate
      @pescepattate 3 роки тому +1

      Direct injection might do that ,the inlet valve might carbon up

    • @denisrailey777
      @denisrailey777 3 роки тому +18

      Thinner fuel mixture should mean less carbon build up. More towards complete burn.

    • @glenfordmaneja3308
      @glenfordmaneja3308 3 роки тому +4

      So far no problem, I have a 2015 mazda 6 which I bought in 2014 and I still drive it today. City driving pretty much 28 miles per gallon average and takes off faster than most cars. BTW my ieloop stopped working which usually adds another 1 or 2 miles per gallon.

    • @subaruanon
      @subaruanon Рік тому

      Would love to see if they could improve it further by adding Toyota's D-4S technology that combines direct injection and multiport fuel injection in the same engine.

  • @MeeMoo220
    @MeeMoo220 6 років тому +20

    I can’t wait for the next generation of Miatas with the SkyActive-X engine. They already get ridiculous MPGs yet deliver a fun experience.

    • @EngineeringExplained
      @EngineeringExplained  6 років тому +7

      And if they did stuff it in there, it would be a nice power bump!

    • @MeeMoo220
      @MeeMoo220 6 років тому +3

      Engineering Explained Amen! 190hp in a Miata is what a low boost turbo/super charger setup gets you.
      C’mon Mazda, get to it!

    • @TheRagingStorm98
      @TheRagingStorm98 6 років тому +1

      MeeMoo220 You should see the Suzuki Cappuccino with a 13B Turbo.

    • @MeeMoo220
      @MeeMoo220 6 років тому +2

      The Raging Storm that sounds like the best bad idea ever.

    • @TheRagingStorm98
      @TheRagingStorm98 6 років тому

      MeeMoo220 It's there on youtube. Probably not fuel efficient and it a bloody tight fit. But I bet it's a blast to drive.

  • @mklinger23
    @mklinger23 6 років тому +39

    190 hp really isn't bad for a super efficient engine

    • @ikbendusan
      @ikbendusan 6 років тому +15

      to the contrary, i would say it's really good

    • @CyroTheSpider
      @CyroTheSpider 6 років тому +7

      Might just be my European mind, but 190 is plenty enough for a hatchback or some sort of non-American family car.

    • @Ehal256
      @Ehal256 6 років тому +3

      190hp out of a 2l, yeah that's pretty good.

    • @DeathBringer769
      @DeathBringer769 6 років тому +2

      190hp actually really impressed me for power output from what's supposed to be a super efficient engine. Usually you're lucky if you even get 100hp with insanely high MPG cars (electrics are a different conversation) lol.

    • @ZartmanProductions
      @ZartmanProductions 6 років тому +2

      I've got a Mazda3 with the 155 hp engine and that's really enough for how light the car is, and I've driven a Mazda6 with the 184 hp 2.5L engine and it really gets up and goes. I have high hopes for this engine.

  • @sim77
    @sim77 6 років тому

    Very good video, I love the way you explain thing!
    You are one of the best for clear explanation and nice and clear drawing on white board!
    (PS: sorry if my english is not perfect)

  • @elphi4321
    @elphi4321 5 років тому +2

    Finally, a channel that I can understand, appreciate - Thanks.

  • @stoff3r
    @stoff3r 6 років тому +98

    "not super powerful engine, about 190hp"... IN A MAZDA 3 !!!! I am still convinced Americans have different horses than us. If it had 110Hp it would be "not super powerful".

    • @DeathBringer769
      @DeathBringer769 6 років тому +16

      If we could get the usual "slow but efficient" cars that normally have around 60-110hp up to around 190hp standard with the same or better fuel efficiency... that'd be damn amazing. You could focus on just buying purely for MPG and still get a decently quick car. Sounds great to me.

    • @Ticklestein
      @Ticklestein 5 років тому +7

      Americans built 6 liter V8’s with 110bhp. Hearing Americans talk about something being powerful/efficient is weird A/F.

    • @Lykoloo
      @Lykoloo 5 років тому +10

      @@Ticklestein What 6 liter engine made 110bhp when running correctly?

    • @francesco1998
      @francesco1998 4 роки тому +5

      Americans are used to having almost 300 hp V6’s making like 20 mpg average. I am anyway, this is kinda low in terms of overall scale of “power” but the cars are light at the same time, with geared tranny’s, not those shitty CVT’s. And the cars are low with tightish suspensions. So IMO they’re fairly quick.

    • @pepelapew483
      @pepelapew483 4 роки тому

      Cars HP are not real HP ( 1HP = 550# / 1ft / 1 sec ) car hp = 1 hp / hour .

  • @nhilal94
    @nhilal94 6 років тому +26

    Lean AF!

  • @securitron5
    @securitron5 5 років тому

    You're amazing. Great work man, subbed.

  • @Yathuprem
    @Yathuprem 6 років тому

    What an awesome informative video. Thanks EE

  • @MrComputerCoder
    @MrComputerCoder 6 років тому +13

    The amount of math that went into this Engine development must have been so satisfying.
    Wish you would teach my Physics and Calculus courses 😂

  • @udithdilshan4839
    @udithdilshan4839 6 років тому +39

    Rotary engine to this? Damn mazda you finally got it.

    • @mercury9060
      @mercury9060 6 років тому +3

      Udith Dilshan no keep the rotary

    • @uchihakazuma
      @uchihakazuma 6 років тому +15

      Need a new rotary

    • @aMoldyUsagi
      @aMoldyUsagi 6 років тому +7

      My theory is that Mazda has been putting the effort into making internal combustion engines more efficient in order to use that technology to bring the Rotary back.. The Rotary engines main problem was always getting clean and efficient combustion, so if they can perfect the design the Rotary could be a real game changer for the ICE.

  • @hlim431
    @hlim431 5 років тому

    FANTASTIC explanation... thanks so much!

  • @ViniboDJ
    @ViniboDJ 6 років тому

    Thanks for explaining it so well! This engine seems promising!

  • @camberwellcarrot420
    @camberwellcarrot420 4 роки тому +19

    I've seen the future of motoring, and it's ICEy.

  • @tydontdy3459
    @tydontdy3459 5 років тому +84

    7:25 - The lean supercharger is not to improve performance...
    Oh it'll improve performance... just give the tuners about 6 months after its release

    • @CesarMartinez-wi7wc
      @CesarMartinez-wi7wc 4 роки тому +9

      maybe not actually. The engine is very precise in when it sparks, so I don't see many ways it could improve performance. It would make the mixture less lean, therefore defeat the purpose of the engine.

    • @spencerphilippinedream3706
      @spencerphilippinedream3706 4 роки тому +8

      yeah but then he explained what it does (puts crazy amounts of air in the engine) and.....isnt that increasing performance? lets pretend that they did this without a supercharger first. it would be considered underpowered because in order to get the correct air/fuel ratio, it would have to inject less fuel. so then they introduce a supercharged version. everyone would say it is for power even if it is only to get HP figures up to todays standards.

    • @tlpusher9652
      @tlpusher9652 4 роки тому +3

      @@spencerphilippinedream3706 lol no cause 190 hp for a n/a 4 cylinder is very up to hp standards, but would require more fuel. This engine being able to run so lean, it needs the charger to even supply the amount of air it needs

    • @spencerphilippinedream3706
      @spencerphilippinedream3706 4 роки тому +12

      @@tlpusher9652 you said almost exactly what i was trying to say so im not sure that i explained it very well. you dont "NEED" a supercharger to get 37:1 air/fuel ratio. simply inject less fuel. in that scenario, you would have very efficient engine but under powered. right? if you injected less than half the fuel (to get 37:1 instead of 14:1) the engine would create about half the power (95 HP).
      superchargers are parasitic. it cost HP to gain HP. so for max "efficiency" a supercharger isnt needed. this is why i say, the supercharger is for power, not efficiency.
      i think a n/a engine would be MORE efficient. however, it would have to be double the displacement to create the same power as a traditional 14/1 air/fuel ratio. so 2.5 liter power from a 5.0 liter displacement. that doesnt seem like good marketing.
      and the reason they cant use a turbo (NOT PARASITIC) is because turbos dont provide boost at idle. so not only would it be HALF as efficient at idle, but probably wouldnt pass emissions.
      this response just got too long. the bottom line is that i believe this concept is possible for a n/a engine but nobody would buy a 95 hp engine in 2020. so mazda decided to supercharge it up to 190 hp but when confronted with "190 hp isnt that much for a supercharged engine" they responded with "it isnt for power, its for economy". there are much, MUCH easier and cheaper ways to increase the air/fuel ratio than by supercharging.

    • @spencerphilippinedream3706
      @spencerphilippinedream3706 4 роки тому +3

      @@raynic1173 Dang, All this sarcasm for disagreeing with them saying that their "supercharger is for economy"? i never claimed to have some great idea, so im not sure where you got that from. this is common knowledge, but you can choose to believe whatever you want.
      im sure you will respond with how you are right and i am wrong, so go ahead and get in the last word. it doesnt bother me because im not interested in continuing a conversation with you.

  • @corvuslaeus9540
    @corvuslaeus9540 6 років тому

    Captivating and very interesting. Great explanation

  • @garylongshaw1299
    @garylongshaw1299 5 років тому

    That was a great explanation, I have a Mazda CX3 (2017) 2.0l which is stamped with a Sky-active badge...I had no idea really what that meant until I saw you explain all this. Ive always had Mazda's, great drivers cars, and this new one is no exception, it is incredibly light on fuel while still being great to drive and very punchy..Averages around 6.5Litres per 100Km, for you guys in the states that is 36.2 US Miles to the Gallon, on combined city and freeway cycles.

  • @kazn10
    @kazn10 6 років тому +242

    Mazda, the opposite of Volkswagen. They do a really good job.

    • @crackedemerald4930
      @crackedemerald4930 6 років тому +4

      Bürguerauto? only for the richest?

    • @Tonyx.yt.
      @Tonyx.yt. 6 років тому +19

      not only monkeys, also humans... and most important: test shows that modern tdi exhaust gas are more harmfull than exhaust from a 20 yrs older ford powerstroke powered light truck...

    • @lukerinderknecht2982
      @lukerinderknecht2982 6 років тому +11

      hawkseye that's why I dumped my TDI for a CX-5!

    • @nc3826
      @nc3826 6 років тому +5

      They admitted to doing tests on monkeys but deny using humans... So stop monkeying around with this story :)
      And it depends what ur pollutant ur testing for and therefore r calling harmful and its no rational for bring back a 20 yrs older ford powerstroke engine

    • @jgripen969
      @jgripen969 6 років тому

      Tony x
      Huh, wonder what my Bayerische V8 puts out 🧐

  • @pirihern9329
    @pirihern9329 6 років тому +42

    I lost you 3 times got it right the 4th time muchas gracias

  • @The_Dark_Lord-69
    @The_Dark_Lord-69 6 років тому

    I like how passionate you are about HCCI engines.

  • @fumeta3194
    @fumeta3194 6 років тому

    Nice video! I loved the explanation.

  • @wakefielddevin
    @wakefielddevin 6 років тому +6

    So proud to drive a Mazda! I've been a fanboy since before I even bought my first car (2005 Mazda3) which two years later traded in for a 2008.5 Mazdaspeed3 and till this day still continues to give me plenty of "Smiles Per Hour" Sorry Volkswagen owners.

  • @PhantomSquid
    @PhantomSquid 6 років тому +88

    Mazda is making up for all of the gas guzzling rotaries

    • @bunbunson27
      @bunbunson27 6 років тому +2

      Rotaries does for our mpgs

    • @DrewLSsix
      @DrewLSsix 6 років тому +3

      Chinmay Chinnu. Rotaries dont get great mpg for their displacement but they do well enough for their output. The rx8 got similar mpg to the S2000, even though it was a larger car with vastly better specific output.

    • @LoganBlood
      @LoganBlood 6 років тому +9

      totally worth it

    • @xIcarus227
      @xIcarus227 6 років тому +1

      DrewLSsix I don't think an S2000 runs 18L/100KM around town honestly, but I admit I am not familiar with the car. Does it really?

    • @DrewLSsix
      @DrewLSsix 6 років тому +1

      Sergiu-Lucian Petrică. Dont know the metric conversions but the rx8 gets two fewer mpg than the s2k, both get rather poor in town mileage similar to my truck lol. The s2k does get a bit more range on the highway but is also a significantly smaller car with significantly lower specific output.
      If you look at the per liter output of these things the mileage males some sense, a 4 banger of just 1.3L making 200+ HP naturaly aspirated would doubtless get worse mileage. Meanwhile the rare rotary detuned to typical piston engine outputs can get very respectable mileage, but thats not the selling point in most applications.

  • @robertzrn8112
    @robertzrn8112 6 років тому

    I just want to let you know that I really enjoy your videos.
    It is superb explained and easy to understand.
    As for the engine ( improved engine) of Mazda , kudos to them for making it.
    As an engineer myself , I only could imagine what went on with making this huge improvement .
    Oh wait ,
    But i know ,
    Maaaaaaaaaaaaath , endless math ...

  • @brandongallite7579
    @brandongallite7579 6 років тому

    Props to EE for the most comprehensive explanation I have seen on SPCCI to date. While I have come to expect great insight from your channel, you have exceeded expectations here, again.
    I have been monitoring SPCCI since it was announced, but I had not seen the pressure sensor explanation piece until here, which makes sense to my novice ears.
    I expect my next car will be a Mazda with SPCCI. I hope they put these engines in their CX lineup. 😉

  • @IceTeaMan022
    @IceTeaMan022 6 років тому +8

    it would be good to compare this engine to the new infinity variable compression engine

  • @r.a.d2380
    @r.a.d2380 5 років тому +6

    This is why I love mazda❤❤❤🚗

  • @thorvelasco1467
    @thorvelasco1467 6 років тому +1

    Previously owned a 2006 DC5 with a k20z1 engine. Sold it and bought a 2015 Mazda 3 SGT. The Skyactive engine is pretty awesome that it can operate on 87-93 octane with high compression and no knock. Non-noticeable knock. I love Honda engines but they are so temperamental in the fuel they use, especially in the ivtec engines. I am speaking about a 12 year advance/difference in ECU engine management, so it's not really apples to apples. Speaking of gasoline engine advances, what happened to the Scuderigroup and Duke engines? Yes, my Mazda can achieve up to 41 mpg hwy @ posted speed limits calculated with pencil and paper, the onboard mileage app and Palmer DashCommand. Thanks for the upload!

  • @wiktordankwa6705
    @wiktordankwa6705 6 років тому +2

    The amount of engineering that went into designing that engine is just incredible

  • @dakkaradventuretraveller5001
    @dakkaradventuretraveller5001 6 років тому +9

    I love it

  • @alexmoore5970
    @alexmoore5970 6 років тому +58

    Can this be combined with Nissans variable compression pistons? If So, will this fit in my Honda ?

    • @ThePASBERUK
      @ThePASBERUK 6 років тому +5

      alex moore ah my fellow mightcarmod fan

    • @ootdega
      @ootdega 6 років тому

      My first thought was swapping one into my older Nissan. Wonder what it sounds like.

    • @alexmoore5970
      @alexmoore5970 6 років тому +4

      I would like to see this engine combined with Nissans variable compression pistons, with the capability to rev to 12k, I wouldn't care if it's gutless (lack of torque) and placed in an RF mx5. That would be the best drivers car of all time.

    • @arijfroo
      @arijfroo 6 років тому +1

      As best as I can tell, a combination of both technologies would be superior, but there's some overlap in how they are achieving better efficiency, so there's some diminishing return.
      YES. IT WILL FIT IN YOUR HONDA!

    • @Gregg0112
      @Gregg0112 6 років тому

      alex moore variable compression piston?

  • @SweatSquad31
    @SweatSquad31 4 роки тому

    Well explained. Good job!

  • @isaacroebuck9514
    @isaacroebuck9514 6 років тому

    Absolutely brilliant, glad to see that at least the internal combustion engine's sunset years are also it's golden age. The great change is soon upon us, maybe it's for the best, but these days will be forever, fondly remembered.

  • @HazewinDog
    @HazewinDog 6 років тому +5

    I really love Mazda for what they're doing... so I want to support them by getting a great used Mazd... right... me buying a used Mazda doesn't help them :/ but I like my 80s/90s cars lol, what can I do ;/

  • @lightnabrown
    @lightnabrown 5 років тому +5

    Thank you for your outstanding explanation about the Skyactive engine theory.
    I have a question regarding higher octane useage in this engine, and I will devide it to two parts:
    1. Knowing that this engine requires "knock" to occur for its operation, what will happen if you were to put ideal fuel in it (100 octane? the kind the would't knock...)?
    2. In my country, the lowest octane we have is 95, and the highest is 98. You said that the ideal fuel for this engine would be 80 octane, so as it gets higher it becomes less efficient? Is it true to say that every Skyactive engine being sold in my country doesn't live up to its potential?
    Thank you for your time, and for satisfing my curiosity!

    • @jamesgaskin7757
      @jamesgaskin7757 4 роки тому

      Us ron is different to UK ron
      91=98

    • @dbweber2323
      @dbweber2323 4 роки тому

      The latest info is that mazda has 2 versions of this engine a "US" version and a version for europe each tuned for different octane fuel. also the version for the us has a 15:1 compression ratio and the UK version will be 16.3:1, so you will not need to worry about the fuel it will be optimized for your higher octane fuel.

  • @toast47624
    @toast47624 Рік тому

    I learn something every single time I watch your videos. I'm smarter for it. NEVER compromise the detail (which you don't it seems) If I don't understand something I'll just go and research it further.

  • @BullyHayes1977
    @BullyHayes1977 6 років тому

    well done - great video. something to look forward to with the mazdas coming!

  • @mannamedbanjo
    @mannamedbanjo 4 роки тому

    Could watch his videos for hours. This actually is informative car buyer info

  • @subjer0
    @subjer0 6 років тому +14

    I wonder how reliable these engines will be? I think it's cool and I admire Mazda for doing something different and going against the grain, but Mazda just made the gasoline engine much more complex in the name of efficiency. It's a good thing and a bad thing. I wonder if it will be a pain in the ass to trouble shoot when something goes wrong.

    • @portedbikes
      @portedbikes 6 років тому +3

      Von Ace that was my question, a ton more sensors... yes those that go bad without warning, lot more computing perfection on a mechanical engine and those super high compression ratios... a bit hard to keep it all balanced and in harmony for long. But let's wait and see how do they perform on the long run.

    • @garriteinig3445
      @garriteinig3445 6 років тому +5

      I can't imagine maintenance on these will be any worse than many of the small, turbocharged engines popular in Europe. Nowadays, most new engines are very complicated, so this one, comparatively, shouldn't be too bad.

    • @peterrobannsobrepena6029
      @peterrobannsobrepena6029 6 років тому +1

      Von Ace
      Like how steam engine do in their last stand against internal combustion engine

    • @djayt1215
      @djayt1215 5 років тому +1

      Lol engines will always get more complex. Thats how progress is made.

  • @adnamamedia
    @adnamamedia 6 років тому +3

    This is why I love Mazda.
    If I had one question, though, how does this extremely lean, high compression ratio combustion affect the power? I would assume these don't make a while lot of power. Adding onto that, is there an easy way to switch to a higher power mode?

    • @avnett4922
      @avnett4922 6 років тому

      190 hp is good power Alex.

  • @pac1fic055
    @pac1fic055 4 роки тому

    I’ve been a Mazda fan since my family had a 323 hatchback(called GLC in the US). It was a solid car.

  • @SiyathWidyaratne
    @SiyathWidyaratne 6 років тому

    Any attempt to prolong IC whilst trying to save the world is commendable! Great video as always!

  • @nooranik21
    @nooranik21 6 років тому +67

    Could this technology be combined with Nissians VCR engines or is that sort of unecessary? Sidenote, it is incredibly impressive that they can do this on 87 octane. When you first started explaining this I thought "wouldn't buy it, I don't want to pay for premium gas." If they offer this in a car with AWD, I think I know what my next car will be.

    • @EngineeringExplained
      @EngineeringExplained  6 років тому +23

      The techs are different approaches, rather than combinable technology really. This engine is trying to be as efficient as possible rather than having a high power mode. As is, it has electronically controlled valve timing which can alter the compression ratio significantly lower than 16:1 if desired.

    • @Karavusk
      @Karavusk 6 років тому +7

      Engineering Explained I am pretty sure 95 octane is the cheap fuel in Germany... so this engine would run worse here?

    • @hotdognr12323
      @hotdognr12323 6 років тому +10

      They use a different way to measure octane rating in the US, their 87 octane is somewhere around 91 european octane. It's still lower, but not as much as one would think.

    • @nooranik21
      @nooranik21 6 років тому

      Engineering Explained thanks for the reply, which technology will yeild a better consumer product.

    • @Egotiator
      @Egotiator 6 років тому

      Which one would you say, in any objective way, is better? Which one is more exciting to you?

  • @LividLeon
    @LividLeon 6 років тому +5

    Mitsubishi had something similar many years ago called Mitsubishi Vertical Vortex (MVV)

    • @roberthale8407
      @roberthale8407 5 років тому

      Even earlier was the use of jet valves.

  • @FutureSystem738
    @FutureSystem738 6 років тому +1

    Great video, Really Good description, incredibly clever no doubt, but Geezuz, talk about complex.
    I’ve seen other stories about this motor, but your narration and description is perfect, thanks.
    (However, give me an electric motor any day, I can just begin to imagine the repair bill on this when your check engine lamp illuminates.)

  • @markwong6548
    @markwong6548 4 роки тому

    I learn so much watching this channel.

  • @Creeperboy099
    @Creeperboy099 6 років тому +8

    now, imagine this tech combined with Infiniti Variable Compression :)

  • @mercury9060
    @mercury9060 6 років тому +10

    I want Mazda to continue working on the rotary

    • @hihi-fi8by
      @hihi-fi8by 6 років тому +1

      TheElementalSponges Maybe after they master this engine then they transfer all that tech to the rotary

    • @Imleocalm
      @Imleocalm 6 років тому

      They never stopped...

    • @mercury9060
      @mercury9060 6 років тому

      Imleocalm true, but they haven’t said much.

    • @Imleocalm
      @Imleocalm 6 років тому

      TheElementalSponges Yes they did. The most efficient variant of a Rotary Engine is one that runs on HFC. And their are VERY few HFC Stations in the world.

    • @DrewLSsix
      @DrewLSsix 6 років тому +1

      TheElementalSponges. They have been working hard at establishing them selves post Ford. Hopefully in the next few years they will push towards more performance options, but for now they have done a spectacular job righting their ship!

  • @lorriecarrel9962
    @lorriecarrel9962 3 роки тому

    Great job as always

  • @bobedwards8896
    @bobedwards8896 6 років тому

    This is my go-to morning dooky show, thanks man!