Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 vs XPLANE 12 Physics Comparison
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 вер 2022
- #MICROSOFTFLIGHTSIMULATOR2020
BECOME A MEMBER: / @fultonofficialkfv
SUPPORT THE CHANNEL
YOUR DONATION GROWS THE CHANNEL:
www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted...
why you should follow on social media?
I can answer your question ASAP
Instagram: / fulton_kilebe
Discord: / discord
Twitter: / kilebefulton
Twitch: / kfvgames
Facebook: / fultonoffici. .
i7-8700k
GTX 1050 TI 4VRAM
40GB RAM
ASUS TUF GAMING-PRO
4TB Storage
Stay tuned - Ігри
Not gonna lie…I’ve seen your videos before, but damn…this took the cake! Well done Fulton! Well done!!! Haven’t laughed this hard in quite awhile! Thank you for your service!
😊😊😂🙏
I like how some have "somehow" managed to obtain a pilot license but have nothing to do whatsoever with physics in general and are even amazed and agree with other retards who also have nothing to do with understanding anything correctly! Maybe they don't even deserve to understand anything correctly!;)
@@FULTONOFFICIALKFVI liked it.
you failed. The A320 has a protection system that prevents it from entering a bank angle, so it is almost impossible to see this plane enter a spiral, unlike the Boeing 737.
exactly
Unless you disable that system :)))
The A330 behaves the same way in X-Plane so...
@@LOLgamerCZ but for that the channel should had done the same :))) (if it is possible in msfs)
exactly
That was a really bad comparaison from both sides... please don't refer to this
First time to the channel? I think you’re missing the point of some of his videos. Take a step back and laugh for a moment. Not everything needs to be taken seriously. The fact that he’s score keeping should clue you into this being a video made in jest. Even the tests themselves aren’t very substantive. They’re arbitrary and look at the outliers or obscene circumstances. It’s ok to have a bit of fun every once in awhile.
@@azayasund This doesn't seem like any intended fun at all, the only real visual clue you mentionned is the score, which is used widely by comparaison videos all around UA-cam and is sometimes a good indicator in some subjects. The title and description also do not mention anything regarding if we should take the video seriously or not. He just puts some hashtags, a donation link, his specs and that's pretty much it. The creator at least doesn't seem to really pick a side, but prefers making a low-effort and unreliable video to profit of the widely talked-about release of XP12
@@berinchtein no offense, and you’re entitled to your opinion, but it’s infinitely sad that things have to be labeled a joke and that some can’t find humor in anything anymore. As if “Let’s try a barrel roll in airliners” and water landings with the gear down aren’t indicators enough that this video was made in jest (note: it all seems arbitrary and he’s not even trying to be objective), the ending was even more hilarious after he declared MSFS the “winner” of his “testing”. But go ahead, go off…lol
@@berinchtein may I suggest staying away from Swiss001 as well if this is your take.
I agree with you, i mean look at this nonsence when the plane gets pushed in the wind in msfs.
7:13
3:07 pilot here, you can not roll the A320 because it has the roll bank angle protection in the normal law. Turn off ADIRU 2 and 3 to enter the alternate law which will have degraded protection, you can also lower the gear and raise it again while in the alternate law to switch to direct law (no protections and no auto trim), and do the test again.
I knew it's a bank angle protection (< 60 degrees as I remember?) but HOLY HELL you just described how to override it. You sure it's an info that should be out in the internet? Isn't there regulations that forbid you to share that info? It's a double sided coin for sure - on one hand I WANT TO know more details about the planes that I fly, on the other hand - this info could potentionally (with a VERY low probability but still...) be used in a bad way, no?
@@armaga144 first time on the internet kid ?
@@armaga144 my man, there are public sops, fcoms, qrhs, etc. It's basic flightsim knowledge how to override FBW protections. none of this is "private". the only "private" thing about aviation is certain company specific safety sops. That's it
@@Deezorz gotcha. Thanks for the info
i'm pretty sure that all pilots that fly these planes already know about this@@armaga144
Note about the hard landing: You came in at 60 knots on XP12 and 90 on MSFS. That's what caused them to be different.
same as the water landing too.
@@JWC924 trying to make MSFS21020 worse than XP12, XP12 is shit end of story and it no longer has the best flight model
I like how you can even hear the overspeed lmao
@@1littlelee nah msfs is worse than xp12 if you want a genuinely realistic experience, but msfs is more just for fun tbh
Aerofly FS 4 is better than both of them. A plane should jump up again when you touch down too hard.
The test with the a320 doesnt make sense since the airbus flight logic in normal law prevents it.
That's the whole point there. It's all just a big joke.
0:41 there is no clear winner because you have crashes off in FS2020 settings. If you enabled that in XP, the plane would bounce off in a similar way. Then, if you enable crashes in FS, the flight would end and you would see crash message. XP surely has a slightly better crash visualization (like some models are partially destructible and you can see fire and smoke animation), but this is not something I would expect from a civil aviation sim, for destruction and fire there is DCS.
What I really miss in FS though is the automatic replay mode, something like even last 20 minutes of flight would be great.
DCS does not have civilian aircraft and costs 80 dollars per module.
Yeah in XP12 default settings, if you nose the plane down into the ground like you were going to screw it into the ground, the plane will erupt in a big ball of flames.
@@wolfan8057 more like 40
He's just salty because his PC can't run FS2020 so smoothly.
Why don't you put the flight model in realistic mode on fs2020?
he has it in realistic 💀
Out of the box experience?
@@basedcs No it's not in realistic mode
@@tytoos6803 how do you know?
@@tytoos6803 how do I put it in realistic
As far as realism in Collisions, both flight simulators get a 0 - Zero.
x plane 11 was good but it is past tense, now that fs 2020 exists it is obvious that it is superior and if they still say that physics as fs 2020 is already surpassing it or already surpassed it and fs 2020 is still in development, so stop crying and accept reality.
It's not really a development issue, they make it that way because airlines don't want people to see their airplanes damaged or destroyed, it's bs but it does make sense
@@canexfex5325 for real
@@coldary2338 yeah fanboy
@@canexfex5325 Bro X Plane 12 is on open beta
I was excited to see this comparison, claiming as it did to compare flight physics. What I watched instead was a comparison of aspects of flight that only a gamer could find interesting. Crashes and collisions? Come on. And even so, I can't understand why you chose one sim over the other most times. I was hoping to see actual flight dynamics compared. I'm a pilot, and I'm willing to bet you aren't. I own both Sims, and have flown each for decades. Hands down, X-Plane flies most like real planes. MS doesn't come close. Maybe MS pleases the gamer, but it can never teach.
couldnt agree more 😭
MSfs can definitely teach, not for flying due to the physics, but learning how to start aircraft and getting familiar with the cockpits and avionics.
Both X-Plane and Flight Simulator could stand to take a few lessons from DCS World with respect to crash/damage modeling.
Thats right, but on the other hand it is no surprise, that a combat simulator which is about damaging and shooting down aircraft has a good crash model, while civil simulators have no priority set on crash simulation
Plane companies involved in msfs dont want to see their planes get destroyed
@@Haniel93 yea true but when you going down you got just black screen when i going down i want fight whit plane
I think the REAL reason there's no crash/damage model is because we're all a bunch of 'snowflakes' these days and we're being treated accordingly! ;-)
@@MikeInExile nah its for the same reason why car companies dont let gta get license to use real cars. They dont want to see their own cars being used in that manner. Has nothing to do with how people are snowflakes who cares if u crash in a video game. Its a business practice.
The Physics argument in a 2d simulation environment is so ridiculous and any real-life Pilot will tell you that it's a whole different world when flying for real. The forces on the yokes, the jarring motion of getting knocked around by pockets of air, the g-forces, and perception is what make true flight characteristics that cannot be modeled (This is what armchair pilots think they get when Austin tries to "sell" then the whole Physics thing. When you look at the sim community in general most of them like to fly airliners on autopilot so you wouldn't "feel" anything anyway. Even million-dollar level D training simulators can't give you realistic flight dynamics so what chance does a $60 pc sim have? We do get in both sims offer highly accurate aircraft in systems with advanced autopilots. Get over it boys, the whole physics thing is a red herring it's literally making up such a small percentage of your "game" experience anyway
The notions that XP has better flight simulation is just a notion. It maybe valid in the past but XP12 seems still uses Blade element theory. This flight dynamics calculating tech is pretty old. Haven't found CFD visualisation option. P-Factor with Perf. Data on MSFS more accurate there. MSFS in the other hand has CFD, which you can actually see the simulation and simulated surfaces on the airplane. XP maybe using 5 simulated surfaces on an airplane and MSFS uses hundreds of simulation surfaces in an aircraft, thus makes it more accurate and realistic.
Here's the CFD simulation in visual and data form. And I would like to see XP to provide with their simulation data as well.
ua-cam.com/video/Ndl07_7PsWg/v-deo.html
Pilot here, Flying on the sim is way harder than IRL. People fighting about which one has better physics, guys just enjoy the damn sims lmao
this is what i have been trying to say lol
@@mikeyplayz8438 that person literally explained to you in the most understandable way and you still dont get the point but im not surprised at some XP users tho.
@@masflow09 Right? Armchair pilots are like that. What's funny though is that most will pop on the AP and follow a green or magenta line in an airbus or 737 claiming how fantastic the "Dynamics" are without actually having felt real dynamics. They think their $50 joysticks are going to resolve the forces of flight magically
Some parts of MFS2020 made me feel as if I was playing GTA.
Also the physics in MSFS aren't as bad as everyone thinks.
The notions that XP has better flight simulation is just a notion. It maybe valid in the past but XP12 seems still uses Blade element theory. This flight dynamics calculating tech is pretty old. Haven't found CFD visualisation option. P-Factor with Perf. Data on MSFS more accurate there. MSFS in the other hand has CFD, which you can actually see the simulation and simulated surfaces on the airplane. XP maybe using 5 simulated surfaces on an airplane and MSFS uses hundreds of simulation surfaces in an aircraft, thus makes it more accurate and realistic.
Here's the CFD simulation in visual and data form. And I would like to see XP to provide with their simulation data as well.
ua-cam.com/video/Ndl07_7PsWg/v-deo.html
Exactly this.
Exactly, especially if your using payware addons it becomes really good
Yeah people think physics are bad in msfs2020 because of the camera angle but in reality it isnt
747 bouncing at 120 knots isn’t bad?
There ain’t no way anyone can watch one of those msfs planes fly from the external view and tell me the physics look even semi-realistic 😂
You tell 'em.
For real! Random remark... Do you guys feel like in FS 202 there's way too much bloom and the planes always seem to be bobbing up and down?
The A320 fly by wire system does not let the aircraft do a barrel roll.
6:32 really gave me chills. I've been that pilot in a C172 in real life, more than once. It's not 150 knots though, 40 knots will do alright.
7:45 did not seem that real, btw.
I don't know how that point went to MSFS, tbh
"Landing in water" - You crashed in the water, you definitely not landed or ditched
The person "playing" the keyboard is making comparisons in simulators?
You're very smart.
For the spin physics in MSFS, it's simply because you're using an Airbus without turning off its flight computers!
I love how your plane just says don't sink 😂
About the crash animation. It’s not that the plane just ragdolls after it hits the ground. It’s actually a blackout screen. X plane 12 still gets the point though
Thank bro to making this video
Nice video
IL2 sturmovik has a much better ohysic engine for contacts plane/ground, taking account of the gear's resistance linked to the brutality of the stall or the speed of the plane.
Il2 sturmovik was way ahead of its time especially 1945 the physics were unforgiving
On peut dire que dans le deux cas le réalisme n'est absolument pas au rendez-vous dans les situations extrêmes. Mais ce n'est pas dans ces situations que l'on souhaite utiliser ces deux logiciels. Non ?
Tu as tout à fait raison, ce sont que des jeux vidéos, mais fs2020 a plus proche de la réalité que xp12
When I seen the wheels down I was like oh no. It made me think of Archer letting the wheels down and crashing the sea plane..
I can do a lot with 6"
did he really tried to do a spin with an airbus? XD LMAO
I don’t think the test was accurate
But it was f*cking hilarious watching the planes crash
The 737 doesn't have any protections against spins but a320 has the alpha floor protection that makes it impossible more than 90 degrees
no you turn main law off and alternate
@@ayaan7017 lol idk if it's possible to turn off manually
it is@@altinisikege
@@altinisikegeturn the irs of will
@@lforleee2004 lol
Bro you had me until the turned off damage crash in Microsoft flight simulator 😂
Do you know if this has proper triple screen support? XPlane 11 has it and MSFS will have it when Update 10 goes live - this one thing is make or break for me.
VR is the future, so much better.
@@Nor0252 I bought a VR in 2020 and returned it because it made me sick. Maybe when the tech improves I'll try again.
@@goodlookinouthomie1757 I get sick in a real plane, but not in VR, so may be it won't get ironed out 😄
The A320 neo has a system that prevents the plane to roll over
Yo, in MSFS20 when you crash the screen blacks out and a beezing sound starts....
bro was landing a cessna at 100 knots
Xp12 : has physics
Msfs : whats physics i skipped that on school
After 911 , MS remove the effect of crash.
I wasn't expecting to have a good laugh. 🙂
Hard landing not comparable. High wind - I had older X Plane some years ago and when I tried 172 in wind higher than her normal flying speed, I lost the wings practically immediately after take-off. There is no overstress damage model anymore?
I really don’t understand what criteria you used to give the last 6 points
Imagine using keyboard to steer the plane
No way you tried to roll the a320... LMAO
😊😂😂😂😂
A crash in MSFS just goes to a black screen..Unless you have crashes disabled
what aiport is that at 1:34?
What airport does u use in the video?
Can’t really compare yet because X-Plane 12 is in early access so we would have to wait till I come out fully to really compare.
At the rate XPlane 12 is fairing in comparison to MSFS they probably wont ever take it out of Beta
@@vinylrabbit7295 Yeah, maybe it will take 2 years like MSFS to get it where you don't have an issue every time you load into a flight.
to make this fair, do another video when the actual release comes in december.
You compared a beta version to a two year old release?
that was some bouncy water
1:39 butter.
yea but look at msfs clouds..who needs realistic flight when you have pretty clouds
most people who actually want to fly in a flight sim. If you want pretty clouds go outside. (I mean this in a nice way)
Too be fair. You had damage OFF on MSFS 2020. But yes the physics model of XP-12 is better.
I saw a video that compared the sims, and found the physics are similar.
The notions that XP has better flight simulation is just a notion. It maybe valid in the past but XP12 seems still uses Blade element theory. This flight dynamics calculating tech is pretty old. Haven't found CFD visualisation option. P-Factor with Perf. Data on MSFS more accurate there. MSFS in the other hand has CFD, which you can actually see the simulation and simulated surfaces on the airplane. XP maybe using 5 simulated surfaces on an airplane and MSFS uses hundreds of simulation surfaces in an aircraft, thus makes it more accurate and realistic.
Here's the CFD simulation in visual and data form. And I would like to see XP to provide with their simulation data as well.
ua-cam.com/video/Ndl07_7PsWg/v-deo.html
Not really. At least, not with the CFD on the 172. They're saying fs2020 is more realistic now.
We'll just need to wait until they apply it to the rest of the aircraft.
even with the damage on in msfs its literally just a screen that says " you crashed" obviously xplane12's would be better still
@@xplaneaviator737 Seeing a crashed model tho is not really that nesecary. Its a small unimportant aspect
My man trying to bank the a320 in normal law with a full side stick deflection. It won't go beyond 60 my friend.
Silly comparisons, but enjoyed it lol.
my man turned of damage in msfs 2020
2:37 It's not really a fair comparison, the aircraft used in XP12 seem to be a Boeing 737, unlike in MSFS where you were flying the A320. Airbus controls are electronically limited to avoid such as excessive bank angle, excessive nose dive, and stall.
the wind part in mfs killed me 😂
Not a fair comparison on the crash because you clearly have MSFS crash damage disabled. It doesn't have a cool fire animation like XP but does indicate you crashed and end the flight however you disabled it making it unfair.
Remember xplane 12 is in its beta stage
How do you make in msfs2020 that you can crash without the game saying you crashed? How does the game still continue after a big collision or crash?
he turned off realistic model and damage
just in assistance menu desactivate crashes and damage
@@LeandroMDL thanks
It's just a setting, the flight model is unaffected, just disables crashes... otherwise all we'd see in his vid would be a "Fade to Black"
I don’t know how you gave spin maneuvering and wind to MSFS
The a320 fbw system prevents it from flipping over so it that’s why it wouldn’t bank. But still good video
The first 2 I thought ok that seems realistic, but the a320 has a system wich stops it exiting 40 degrees, and U compared it with a 737 wich does not have fly by wire so it can do that. You’re review of the winds was terrible, how TF do you think physics work?
5:08 the 737 Ryanair has 2 wheels 💀
Sorry to say, but these tests are complete inaccurate. If you test one plane in msfs, same plane needs to be tested in xp. Can’t have 737, and a320, also you’re testing the normal asobo a320, not the FBW addon which is much, much better and is one of the best free addons for msfs. Also, the a320, in normal law cannot exceed set boundaries because of the fly-by-wire system. The 737 does not have that.
True
First one was because in MSFS collision damage might have been turned off 🤦🏻♂️
Why have you Crashs in FS 2020 disabled?
The ryanair boeing 747 in mfs2020💀💀
It is a big problem that drives me crazy:
XP physics better but mediocre graphics
MSFS graphics better but physics mediocre
So I end up using XP one day and MSFS next day.
Yes you said it!! I think that is the biggest problem with these two sims and that is why I went to DCS it has the best of both worlds.
I really use msfs for taking screenshots of those window pics so I can show off on instagram that I'm a frequent flyer. XP is when I want to fly the plane, experience a pilot experience.
physics are similar.
Just buy a a good addon already. And enjoy.
or just buy a good addon, the video itself is already bad since they aren't even using the full realism mode of msfs, and most of the flight model behavior is dependant on the third party developer
All these discussions about realism, level of simulation etc. and I bet that easily more than 70% of simulator flight players (any game) don't care about all that and just want to chill and relax flying around.
The crash physic of msfs 2020 is hilarious😂😂😂
Pretty good video
Hi I have downloaded xplane12 on my i macos Monterey..I have issues it not working properly very slow and also graphic not looking good so do you have any advice what to do..thanks
your pc cant handle x plane 12 or you dont have your graphics turned up
@@waba4115 … or x plane just doesn’t look good ( joke)
don't worry a lot of people are saying the same thing. I holding off from buying it right now. I'm very pleased with MSFS now and I have a been an XP fan for a awhile but i'm moving on to 2022 and on tech.
@@a.marcus4084 My words mate. But you have to say msfs 2020 is just beautiful....
@@a.marcus4084 Yeah. Sadly X-Plane 12 is a bit buggy atm. But it makes sense due to it being early access.
If you turn on msfs realistic it just makes an ear ringing sound effect with a black screen
A320 systems in msfs don’t allow for a spin - just like in real life
Dis toi tenable the damage on FS2020 ? It seems like there is no damage...
Bro said that a flying plane that flies because of WIND WITHOUT ANYTHING is more realistic.
Bro is literally pushing down harder to bounce more in flight sim
3:08 a320 flybywire be like: not today buddy
bruh that guy want to spin A320 with the flybywire bruhhh
The games are not about crashing the planes.
what in MFS2020 "Physics" a wind plane is fly the back
Maybe turn your realism settings on on MSFS. Crashes and water landings are replicated
Yeah man, you are right 100%
Thanks 🙏
I see more channel but his channel is grate this will frist guy shows reality of water in xplane and msfs2020
hi bro, how do you handle the plane? I mean, do you use joystick, keyboard, mouse?
Joystick
why did u try an spinnmanuver with an a320
this thing got an flightenvelope protection
it cant spinn
You had damage off for all of them. you would usually get a screen saying. you damaged your nose and landign gear or stuff.
You can't crash if you never turn the crash mode on 🤫🤭
A video on the physics made with keyboard? Please....
To bad you turned off the crash physics in MSFS to do this comparison, or it would have won them all.
“ I wanna fly and crash into stuff, why is it not accurate”
Because not a single real world pilot goes to flight school to learn how to crash their plane
Brother, if you are going to compare well, do it well, in Microsoft Flight Simulator it is 100 times more realistic than any other simulator, so you can enjoy the most realistic experience you just have to go to MFS2020 settings > assistance options > and put everything in Difficult and realistic. And this is how you will enjoy the true essence of Flight Simulator. Greetings.
Did you never take a science class or did you not pay attention during the part about the scientific method?
Great video BTW!
😂😂
Ok so...which one is better: MFS2020 or XPlane?
On water I found that MFS was more realistic than what’s shown here..
so is X plane,if you dont fucking break it ,like this guy did
You really should try comparing msfs with xplane but change the mode to hard in msfs
125 knots and 150 knots, nobody fly with that wind... jaja
My question would be what about VR performance? With i7 8700k 1080ti 32gb ram and m.2 ssd I can only only get 30 fps in Reverb G2 at 70% render scale and low settings in Msfs.. That is not worth it - Mfsf is all about beauty so it should be at least 45+ fps at medium/high settings in 100% render scale to be considered descent for what it is (not really optimized) I have not tried without Realtime streaming yet, but I do not have bandwidth issues - so that would not make much difference according to sources.. So I really wonder if X-plane 11 or 12 would be able to do 45/60 fps at medium/high settings in VR preferably on 100% render scale on my system specs - then it might be actually worth it.. Maybe someone can give some insight!?
is it possible to satisfactorily run Xplan11 or 12 with 5600g?
i do think so(but xp 12 will be a bit laggy as its still being optimized),while msfs...nahh
Some of those are really iffy points. For a few of those comparisons I wouldn't have given a point to either!