I dont think the name is a problem. It works for Sony, so I dont see why it wouldnt work for Nintendo. Honestly the only thing I want from nintendo is a stronger hybrid console. I barely touch my switch since I have gotten my steamdeck. Only use switch for when I have friend over or when Im playing exclusives
Alright, let's have a civil discussion about this, I totally get where people are coming from with this opinion, yet I feel like it misses a LOT of points that are CRUCIAL to consider when considering the nintendo switch 2 "People will think it's just a slightly more powerful switch" The key word here is *slightly* and the key thing about that slightly is NO NOT IN THE SLIGHTEST. We're talking about 7 year old hardware. You want to see slightly? Look at the PS5 to PS5 Pro. Now THAT'S slightly. We're in a generation that is literally STRUGGLING to run its best sellers. Breath of the Wild on launch was LAGGY in areas, and couldn't even keep a solid 15 frames per second. If we go from THAT to 4k 60fps with DLSS that is anything BUT slightly. "Super Nintendo Switch would have been better" You confuse me with this point because to me, super nintendo switch is literally the Wii U problem AMPLIFIED. People don't know what "Super" means, and they'll only have to go off of what they see. With a 2, it's literally a big red sign that says "HEY THIS IS THE SEQUEL BTW GET THIS ONE" "Innovate every generation and find something gimmicky" You give examples of them doing so...but did you realize each one literally sold less? Meanwhile the Gameboy to Gameboy advance was a MASSIVE upgrade, and the DS to DSI was extremely well recieved? Also lets look at Nintendo Switch's gimmicks. IR sensor, hd rumble, really strong motion controls, labo. You know how much these features are used? I think IR sensor was used in no more than 10 games. People don't want gimmcicks. They want more, and better games. So many people refuse to buy games on switch just because it will look THAT much better on a new console. "It's just greedy cooporation trying to get their money" It's called marketing, and it's quite literally the best idea Nintendo has at this point. We don't need something gimmicky. We don't needs something crazy innovative. People just want more switch. Switch 2 is literally the best idea Nintendo has come up with.
I'm not entirely convinced this isn't some sort of bait. Especially considering UA-cam randomly decided to recommend it to me. And I really do not understand what you're coming from. Your main point is that "Switch 2 will confuse people". But how? You only say it's a bad idea to call it this, but never elaborate on why. You only compare it to the Wii U, which is very far from comparable. There was more confusing things about the Wii U than just the name. Besides, the 2 is an easy moniker for a straight up sequal. Worked for the PS2, works for iPhones, works for pretty much everything that is a sequal. You instantly know it's a sequal. And on that note, calling it the Switch Pro would be terrible, because that would confuse people. That would make people think "well, why upgrade to just a pro model when my standard one plays games just fine". It doesn't signify new, it just signifies old-but-better. Super Nintendo Switch could potentially work, since it's also a nice callback to the SNES, but I'm not too sure on that one. As for your point about the N64, that was a huge failure. At least compared to the SNES. In fact both it and the GameCube were failures for Nintendo. The Wii was a fad mostly, so while it sold well, most of the units sold would just end up collecting dust. Another reason why the Wii U failed, because people were already sick of the Wii name. People aren't sick of the Switch, or at least the concept of it, which is why the Steam Deck and ROG Ally still sell. They just want to see it improve. Another reason why Switch 2 would be a good enough name. Finally, we don't even know if Switch 2 will be the final name. We won't know until it's announced
I've watched 1:11 seconds of your video, and in this time, you're focused primarily on branding. That's a fair argument. But you invalidate your arguments almost immediately. Switch to Switch 2 will fail because no one needs a Switch 2, you say. Explain PS1 through PS5. People didn't buy Wii U because it was a handheld add-on to the Wii. Branding wasn't a factor there. Wii U was a lot more like Sega Genesis + Sega 32X, which was also a failure. Lastly, nextgen Switch branding isn't confirmed. Switch 2 is how everyone is referring to it colloquially. Lastly, lastly, your assertion that it won't sell as well as Switch, you may be correct, and you may be incorrect. It's a nextgen console that will likely remain less expensive than PS5 and Xbox Series counterparts. So, price/value, it's more competitive with a massive library, and due to more power, will have a lot more ports from those systems. So, it will likely sell a ton. Just some things for you to consider.
It will be called Nintendo Attach
I dont think the name is a problem. It works for Sony, so I dont see why it wouldnt work for Nintendo. Honestly the only thing I want from nintendo is a stronger hybrid console. I barely touch my switch since I have gotten my steamdeck. Only use switch for when I have friend over or when Im playing exclusives
Alright, let's have a civil discussion about this, I totally get where people are coming from with this opinion, yet I feel like it misses a LOT of points that are CRUCIAL to consider when considering the nintendo switch 2
"People will think it's just a slightly more powerful switch"
The key word here is *slightly* and the key thing about that slightly is NO NOT IN THE SLIGHTEST. We're talking about 7 year old hardware. You want to see slightly? Look at the PS5 to PS5 Pro. Now THAT'S slightly. We're in a generation that is literally STRUGGLING to run its best sellers. Breath of the Wild on launch was LAGGY in areas, and couldn't even keep a solid 15 frames per second. If we go from THAT to 4k 60fps with DLSS that is anything BUT slightly.
"Super Nintendo Switch would have been better"
You confuse me with this point because to me, super nintendo switch is literally the Wii U problem AMPLIFIED. People don't know what "Super" means, and they'll only have to go off of what they see. With a 2, it's literally a big red sign that says "HEY THIS IS THE SEQUEL BTW GET THIS ONE"
"Innovate every generation and find something gimmicky"
You give examples of them doing so...but did you realize each one literally sold less? Meanwhile the Gameboy to Gameboy advance was a MASSIVE upgrade, and the DS to DSI was extremely well recieved? Also lets look at Nintendo Switch's gimmicks. IR sensor, hd rumble, really strong motion controls, labo. You know how much these features are used? I think IR sensor was used in no more than 10 games. People don't want gimmcicks. They want more, and better games. So many people refuse to buy games on switch just because it will look THAT much better on a new console.
"It's just greedy cooporation trying to get their money"
It's called marketing, and it's quite literally the best idea Nintendo has at this point. We don't need something gimmicky. We don't needs something crazy innovative.
People just want more switch. Switch 2 is literally the best idea Nintendo has come up with.
Also joy con drift sucks. So if they fix that, they win lol
I'm not entirely convinced this isn't some sort of bait. Especially considering UA-cam randomly decided to recommend it to me.
And I really do not understand what you're coming from. Your main point is that "Switch 2 will confuse people". But how? You only say it's a bad idea to call it this, but never elaborate on why. You only compare it to the Wii U, which is very far from comparable. There was more confusing things about the Wii U than just the name. Besides, the 2 is an easy moniker for a straight up sequal. Worked for the PS2, works for iPhones, works for pretty much everything that is a sequal. You instantly know it's a sequal.
And on that note, calling it the Switch Pro would be terrible, because that would confuse people. That would make people think "well, why upgrade to just a pro model when my standard one plays games just fine". It doesn't signify new, it just signifies old-but-better. Super Nintendo Switch could potentially work, since it's also a nice callback to the SNES, but I'm not too sure on that one.
As for your point about the N64, that was a huge failure. At least compared to the SNES. In fact both it and the GameCube were failures for Nintendo. The Wii was a fad mostly, so while it sold well, most of the units sold would just end up collecting dust. Another reason why the Wii U failed, because people were already sick of the Wii name. People aren't sick of the Switch, or at least the concept of it, which is why the Steam Deck and ROG Ally still sell. They just want to see it improve. Another reason why Switch 2 would be a good enough name.
Finally, we don't even know if Switch 2 will be the final name. We won't know until it's announced
very interesting… check out my channel, you’ll see why this video exists. either way, thank you for confirming some suspicions 👍
@@JimmyVegasPlus I wasn't sure what you meant until I saw your "Nintendo Switch 2 is a good idea" video.
ok bud
interesting 🙂
3 view in 2 hours lil bro fell off
I haven’t even got on anything to even fall off yet 🤣🤣
I've watched 1:11 seconds of your video, and in this time, you're focused primarily on branding. That's a fair argument. But you invalidate your arguments almost immediately. Switch to Switch 2 will fail because no one needs a Switch 2, you say. Explain PS1 through PS5. People didn't buy Wii U because it was a handheld add-on to the Wii. Branding wasn't a factor there. Wii U was a lot more like Sega Genesis + Sega 32X, which was also a failure. Lastly, nextgen Switch branding isn't confirmed. Switch 2 is how everyone is referring to it colloquially. Lastly, lastly, your assertion that it won't sell as well as Switch, you may be correct, and you may be incorrect. It's a nextgen console that will likely remain less expensive than PS5 and Xbox Series counterparts. So, price/value, it's more competitive with a massive library, and due to more power, will have a lot more ports from those systems. So, it will likely sell a ton. Just some things for you to consider.
if you wouldn’t mind answering my question, how did you find this particular video?