I said it once and ill say it again. Once Upon a Studio is a MUCH better celebration of 100 years of Disney then whatever slop Wish is. Actually...no Wish is a good celebration of 100 years. It perfectly represents Disney's bad corporate decisions throughout the years.
I watched a review and the reason why it feels like an ai movie is because that the movie knows what’s in a Disney movie but doesn’t know why it’s in a Disney movie.
@@BeyondDrawingsbtw in my opinion wish was not bad. I haven’t seen all of the Disney movies so I wasn’t like I Disney person. I was more of a Pixar person. But strangely enough I enjoyed the movie and I don’t know why. Maybe it was because I had a good day when watching it, maybe it was because of the colours, maybe it was because of songs which I liked btw. I really don’t know. But I think the film wasn’t bad. It was harmless. It’s a 6/10. That’s my opinion btw.
@@Legomoviefan2008probably because it isnt really "bad" but it is so incredibly mediocre it isnt worth remembering, which is very ironic for a 100 year anniversary movie. It is just a movie, not an actual work of art that countless people put their hearts into. Random rant! People nowadays just cant have anything be outside the categories of either "Amazing!!!" or "Horrendeous, god is dead". It's a weird internet thing - "mid", which actually means mediocre (or used to) is internet slang for dogshit. Controversy is the internet 'thing' going on right now, so dont think about peoples opinions too much! Keep judging art by your own heart and preferences.
@@man5262 In a lot of ways being forgettably mediocre is often worse for a piece of media than being so catastrophically awful that it sticks out in your mind, because the awful works actually leave an impact and get attention for it As a smarter man than me once said (possibly paraphrased): "Be good, be bad, just don't be boring."
@@etherealbladerx8153 ...no, in fact, they're much more powerful than whatever Rowling dares call "wizards" and the TLotR universe barely ever really showed any big instances of wizards casting spells. They're just... usually weak on the physical side. They might be able to use a high level spell to lift something heavy... but they need to cast that first, which will be difficult when you're buried underneath a shelf.
@@etherealbladerx8153 Not necessarily... but usually. DnD has six ability scores (strength, dexterity, constitution, intelligence, wisdom and charisma) which demonstrate how good you are. Broadly, most characters will have a couple stats they want and some they don't. Most wizards want intelligence because that's how they cast spells, dexterity since that makes them harder to hit (and they really don't want to be) and a little constitution. Not having a positive wisdom leaves you vulnerable to mind control and other nasty effects. So it winds up that a lot of wizards will have lower strength and charisma.
i work at party city and we got a whole bunch of wish costumes, party favors, balloons, etc. sold none of it. not a single child wanted a wish birthday. no one gave a fuck about it
Disney had more of a glow DOWN over the past century. And you can really see the depressing state of this once pioneering studio right in this soulless “film”. Disney films now are straight up on par with illumination SLOP.
Fun fact @@setaramohamad4235, both films shared at least two Hebrew voice actors: Daniel Magon (who voiced sappy and the minotaur horse) and Gilad Kletter (who voiced John and squirtle).
I feel like they DID write it with chatgpt, and then were supposed to come out and say "you know this movie right? did you know we wrote it using AI? isn't that so cool?" but it flopped so hard they were embarrassed to do it
@@fgvcosmic6752 Funny, Disney's acquisition was in 2009, not 2013. Only the first Iron Man wouldn't have "marvel dialogue writing" if it was truly Disney's fault.
@@KKPlaysGD Actually, a quick search shows that until 2015, it was not run by disney at all and was simply bought out. Hell, it technically wasnt Disney, it was under the Walt Disney Company. And until 2012, the movies were distributed my Marvel themselves.
@KKPlaysGD You phrase this as if it is farfecthed. But Ironman 1 is absolutely the only Marvel movie with no Disney dialogues. Watch it again. It's like watching a whole different franchise.
They now seem too scared to create a classic Disney romance now??? Like we were supposed to have a love story between Asha and the Star Boy AND a villain couple! (I don't remember if they've ever made a villain couple before). We haven't had a classic Disney romance since Tangled! which was 14 years ago!!!
a villain couple would be badasssss, especially if they had the twist of only knowing one villian ahead of time, then meeting second villian while like escaping or something and they do the classic "oh honey we got visitors" and cue villian 1 entering from behind them to playfully grab their waist and kiss their cheek before capturing hero!
The problem is, wish was advertised as a movie with no twist villains… except Magnifico IS a twist villian, just revealed much earlier in the 1st act. Not to mention Simon… Simon is the DEFINITION of a twist villian…
@@icenovice Asha’s friend who betrays Asha in the third act by joining magnifico and becoming a “villain…” I mean, that is LITERALLY A TWIST VILLAIN, DISNEY!
Well, technically Asha's a twist villain, too since she's a bit selfish and doesn't quite seem to learn her lesson. Which is so ironic since she's meant to be the protaganist.
Woman getting a (male) love interest is nowadays a big NONO in the house of mouse. They are supposed to be strong, independed woman who dont need a man and focus on their own carriers, remember?
@@lisaerk8487okay, but they can be strong, independent, goal/career-oriented women while still having a love interest. I mean, both Mulan and Tiana did it.
@@user-iy3nt5mm2v you dont need to remind ME, I know that. In my eyes ALL the disney princesses are strong in their own way! Its DISNEY who needs a reminder but they are at a point that they seriously believe a woman ending up with a man or wanting romance is anti feministm and makes her weak. Feminism is supposed to mean "equality between woman and man" but disney listens to twitter activists who think it means "woman are better then man in every single thing they do, they dont need a man or romance, except if its lesbian romance and man suck anyway." Disney lost its magic a long time ago. The focus is on delivering "the message" and not to entertain their customers anymore and then start to insult said customers as bigots, homophobes, racists, woman haters etc. if they dont show up in the cinema to watch their newest activist movie and it bombs at the box office!
I'm convinced at this point that Disney has completely forgotten the adage *SHOW,* *DON'T TELL* Also, I agree, the animation looks kinda weird, almost seems unfinished. Definitely looks far less appealing than Coco or Moana... or The Incredibles...
@@Yellow6182 you are a king of your land and people. You come from a place of violence and mistrust despite having a humble and decent upbringing. You wish for a land to call your own and grant those under you their desires so no one else would have to burden the hardships you saw during your youth, thus you study hard ALL your life in the art of magic to do so. You craft the kingdom of your dreams, with people coming from all around the world to be your citizens OF THEIR OWN FREE WILL…and the only thing you ask of them in order to become a citizen of your nation (with all its benefits) is to give up their dream/ideal/goal in the hopes that it would be made reality by the Sovereign (you). You live a long and prosperous rule of multiple generations (90 years minimum), kept alive by the fruits of your labour of magic and decide to gently give the reins and responsibility of wish granting onto an apprentice (while still being the ruling sovereign yourself). You teach her the fundamentals of what you know and she asks you a request: Her grandfather is turning 100 and wants to have his wish granted. You find the grandfather's wish and understand that it’s far too vague of a wish to grant: “I wish to inspire the next generation.” How COULD you grant that? Inspiration is a powerful thing, almost as powerful as magic. To inspire the next generation in such a vague and misunderstood way would gamble the fate of the entire would, such great feats of good and evil would be committed in the name of his inspiration. You tell this as such to your apprentice and break it easy to her that cannot in good conscience grant her grandfather's wish, and so she rushes off into the woods in a rage. You are a bit miffed yourself, how could she speak and act that way to you? Her king and master? The next thing you know, you hear news of her wielding a foreign magic that can also grant wishes. You understand from your long studies that magic being used this freely could have disastrous consequences, especially since it’s a magic that you don’t understand and thus a threat to your rule. You gather your citizens and ask of them for the first time to do a request and they would be granted their wish/dreams freely (depending on what the wish is). You then retreat to your study, and open a book that you swore you wouldn’t open unless it was an emergency. You would protect your kingdom from this threat, but have your morales lacking in exchange. Eventually there is a confrontation and you are cast into a mirror by your dear wife, the one you trust the most. You are forever bound to servitude and slavery just for protecting your kingdom you made. And the apprentice? She goes on to be the only wish granter, despite saying that magic shouldn’t be bound to just one person…the hypocrite. And her first wish granted? A world where there are no humans and that animals rule.
@@Yellow6182 king magnifico: "people are bad, they took everything from me and I almost lost my life too" asha: "GRANDPA AND ROSAS PEOPLE GOOD. GIVE BACK WISHES."
Tbh it feels like this movies writing was a draft but the 100th year anniversary would happen before they could actually finish it so they just went “oh it’s good enough-“ and got their workers to finish the animation
@@user-1dkWhYuc5R3-ab0ut_m3he was referring to OP writing “should of” instead of “should’ve (should have)”. Marioboi323 was just correcting bad grammar of the original comment.
Well, there was one animal sidekick that actually was pivotal to the plot, and that was Mushu. Though yeah, I hate that they tried to make the star marketable instead of a hot star BF. They wanted to sell a plush... that now no one wants.
@@bubblybobabubbles COULD YOU IMAGINE THE SHEER PROFIT THEY'D GET FROM KIDS AND THIRSTY ADULTS?! It's like they're allergic to the money they desperately want!
And as much as I’m a sucker for romance, it would’ve been cute if they were just really good friends. At least give him a presence on the screen and a purpose other than as a cute (marketable plushie) sidekick
No taxes, no rent, no poverty, no hunger; he grants wishes if he knows they won't do harm. But everyone, including his wife, turns on him because he doesn't give everyone their wishes.
to be fair for that scene, it was an unfinished animation for a deleted scene. Had that scene wasn't deleted and had been finalized in the film, there wouldn't be any clipping happening cuz it would be refined/fixed in the finished film.
They should have done a Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs where she is both the hero and villain, like she convinces the king to give everyone wishes but then mean people start abusing that power and she realizes that giving people such power is not good
Jesus why did they make the scene where the king gets sucked into the staff so horrifying? I'm not sure if anything he did was bad enough to make me "wish" this on him.
It sounds overly formal, which can work if it’s meant to be humorous - especially if it’s poking fun at British people, or having a posh/stereotypical British character with matching stereotypical dialogue (think C3PO from Star Wars), but this isn’t what Wish was going for.
People: "AI IS GONNA REPLACE ARTISTS AND WRITTERS" Meanwhile when a mega corporation tries to make a film that replaces real writters and artists with AI: "riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight....."
"Gonna" is the operating word. As the absolute fastest improving technology on the globe to date, it's ridiculous to think that it would be incapable of doing the one thing it was made for in like 10 years max.
@@RomanCigićespecially when it's been proven ai is actively dismantling itself because its recycling it's own content to make worse versions of the already bad ai generated content.
No matter how fast it is improving though, by its design it will _never_ be original, so maybe the flaws will be covered better but it's never going to generate something we haven't seen before a thousand times, because it's trained on precisely that kind of stuff. At least not until it becomes fully sapient and by that point I guess it really would be deserving of artistic merit since it's a full person capable of inventing its own stuff.
Bad songs, bad animation, bad villain, bad dialogue, bad choreography, bad references, poor character interaction and development, and a vague message. This is too long of a list for it not to 100% be the producers’ fault. They have sole responsibility over most of these high level concepts and should provide constructive criticism to the director and various leaders throughout each of these processes to ensure the film development is economically driving towards a finished product that will be financially and critically successful. Somehow, this creative process has been destroyed at Disney, squandering capital and talent.
The animation in Wish is secretly fantastic in isolation. It's the post-processing and storyboarding that are terrible. The actual movement of characters is peak animation execution, masked behind a paint of shit decisions. But a lot of people struggle to distinguish the quality of CGI from horrific director decisions. Because an incredibly skilled artist's execution of a shit idea ends up looking like shit, and no amount of skill can salvage it.
@@AmarantiStellar I think someone also mentioned in an production analysis that the techniue in lighting itself with a lack of shadows also hindered it.} It was intended to look like those cartoonish lighting spheres, but looked out of place in a 3D enviroment.
The animation has some pretty obvious flaws in it too. At 3:37 you can see how her hair literally clips through her shoulder. That might sound like a nitpick, but if it was _that_ obvious to me, how did no one else on the editing team catch it!?
@@bugjams to be fair for that scene, it was an unfinished animation for a deleted scene. Had that scene wasn't deleted and had been finalized in the film, there wouldn't be any clipping happening cuz it would be refined/fixed in the finished film.
Literally only thing i can remember from this movie is how the mc sucks, and the villain is somehow the actual good person. And his song is the only banger song
The entire movie feels like the rant of an entitled brat. You have a villain singing "I let you live here rent free." That sounds like something a parent would say to their child. And a spoiled brat would see them as a villain, where as most adults would see that as a rightful owner yelling at a free loader or child. Also the plot of the movie seems like a bad moral. It's the opposite of Bruce Almighty where if people got everything they wish for bad things would happen and they wouldn't really be happy. Or like in Megamind where the wrong person gets super powers and becomes a villain. It is the king's land, so that let them live their rent free is not really a villain line but instead someone who is completely within their right. Imagine if instead of wishes it was what's for dinner. You let some people stay are your house for free and they can make suggestions on what should be for dinner but some are just bad like a kid wanting cake for dinner or other such thing. But being your house and fitting the bill for dinner you get the final say on who's pick they go with. Now that same entitled kid starts a rant because she thinks she should get cake for dinner and everyone else should get what they want even if it's unreasonable. So they tie you up and lock you in the basement of your own house. The story is about an entitled brat of a Villain overthrowing a kingdom.
Depends on the age of the kid, I think. I got occasional “look how much money I’ve spent on you” kind of lectures when I was still too young to get a job, and they weren’t in the moment responses to me acting entitled, either.
to be fair for that scene, it was an unfinished animation for a deleted scene. Had that scene wasn't deleted and had been finalized in the film, there wouldn't be any clipping happening cuz it would be refined/fixed in the finished film.
it must be insane to have written a whole movie script an it's so bad to the point it's been accused of being AI generated 😭 the concept art from the book "The Art of Wish" was amazing but I think the directors pushed more to just getting references. It's so obvious that the duet between Asha and the King was the original love song between Asha and human Star. She was supposed to be a stern character, star was the goofy side but they combined the characters and it didn't work out omgngdhghfd honest to god i dont think people would complain if disney did a remake of wish with its original concepts 😭
Disney no longer puts romances in their movies due to adult women blaming their older movies for giving them unrealistic dating expectations. I've figured it out. If you notice, no modern (non-remake) Disney movies have any romantic plot. That's for when this generation grows up, they have no media company to blame for not getting laid!
i mean to be fair, remastering the grimms stories was probably not a good idea for kids movies that teach "lessons" thru the characters. i mean og sleeping beauty was SAed and gave birth to twins while asleep... disney just made her get kissed without even knowing dude was doing it sooo, not as creepy but still gross to teach kids that it is cool to do that.
They don't put it into their movies because they want 'strong female characters' without putting in effort. Even though it used to work just fine. Example: Tiana from the Frog Prince is an actual strong female character who also finds love.
It was concerning to a point, but the fact that Disney keeps making any trend is a problem in the first place. Both are true at once. You can’t expect immediate romance all the time (which is what a little girl will conclude unless told otherwise) but some couples really do just hit it off. It’s both. Rather than just do one or the other until it’s overdone, Disney could have just offered a variety of ways people find each other.
Tangled did the romance pretty well, especially when they followed through with the series and showed the ups and downs of a relationship... And then we never got something after that
4:44 That's an issue I noticed current movies in general have. Waaay too much dialogue. There's nearly no nuance, no letting the scenes speak for themselves. Nope.
I think people are giving humans more credit than they are worth. Especially corporate. Here's how the board meeting probably went: "What does Disney stand for?" "Making wishes come true" "How do we make sure to appeal to everyone?" "Make all wishes come true" And no one thought about wish contradictions, so the very foundation was broken, and it all just spiralled from there
I remember being super happy happy see that there would be a Disney movie where the protagonist had my name (i don’t see a lot of people/characters with my name) and then being thoroughly disappointed, and instantly dropped my stupid 12 year old dream of having the story I created be produced as a movie by disney. Im upset now.
For a second I thought you were joking with the “I let you live here for free and don’t even make you pay rent” I was shocked to find out that line is real XD
1:35 - Ok... wait... really? This same logic can be applied to ANY story. Fooly Cooly - A girl lands on earth and after she starts hanging out with Nandaba family stuff starts getting weird. Naota along with the robot that grew out of his forehead work together to fight threats. Eventually the find out that a lot of these threats stem from some power from deep space chasing Haruko (the girl). There are some things that happen in the middle but those are goose chases to get to those three points. Wish is a bad film but your 'analysis' of it, is pretty surface level.
After watching this video, I wrote a script for a Disney animation with AI, just out of curiosity. With very little guidance, I just gave the AI a few information about the theme and so on, and it wrote a script that was 100 times better. Even GPT 3.5 isn't as bad as this.
This is off-topic, but I am very passionate about it. Epitome is the stupidest word in the english language. It's written 'epitome' and pronounced 'apidemy', like what the hell???? Like bro, you're telling me 'ep-i-tome' is pronounced 'ap-id-emy'???? Hell nawww man
That would be how it should be pronounced without any exceptions. Unfortunately, English has a tendency to steal words from other languages and not change the spelling or pronunciation. So for this particular word, you basically need to switch to speaking Latin for one word before switching back to English.
I have a suggestion for Magnifico: keep his he created the kingdom Story, but make it because he wants Power. He settled down as King but oh- Star- a Potential threat. Scared of this New possible foe, he turns to dark magic, which he used back then to create the kingdom. This dark magic then Returns him to the old King who only sought Power, and he finds out he can become much more powerful than ever before by sucking the magic out of his citizens, thus causing some side effect. Plus he Puts on a curse that makes everyone be unable to leave so he can keep harnessing their magic energy. Villain song: him singing about how he wants more and more and he can't have enough, while mc sings about how she has everything she needs. Direct contrast between the two. FORGET THE FIRST PART WHERE I WAS TALKING ABOUT WISH, NEW MOVIE TIME. Boom. Villain starts doing his mischief to mc's people because he Expanded his Power beyond his own kingdom. Mc goes to his kingdom, Sees what happened, thus filling her with even more determination to get rid of the King. In the climax, the hero somehow defeats the King by Turning his own magic against him. SOMEHOW. I might be cooking. I might be bs-ing. Either way, it's my idea. Don't know what that means, but I said it
It sucks too cause I remember when it got announced I was like “Okay, the concept is interesting at least” having a movie based on the trope of the wishing star is at least unique. Then the movie dropped and it was like “oh, it’s one of THOSE movies” lol
I love how in stores you always see wish merch never being sold. I remember there was this end cap that just had toys and it was there for months. Nothing on that end cap even moved.
Just with how generic it is, def AI. Look at it, it doesn't have any unique designs and all the architecture doesn't match very well. My mother even pointed out the blurry backgrounds (she doesn't know what AI is) and said that she thought they were messed up in production. I paused it and checked, def AI, no consistent details and everything is too washed out.
Daaaaang! That was the most awesome articulation of Checkov's gun I've ever heard and you didn't even use thr phrase. It's not about making sure A leads to B later, it's about making sure B feels earned.
If you watch a super old disney movie, I think its Aristocats, theres a scene where a woman goes to feed an apple to a horse. Except theres no apple in her hand. So the horse leans down, and a crunch sound plays as the horse bites thin air. When I saw it for the first time I was like “what did that horse just crunch on, her pinky finger?!”
@@ava4689except that movie was animated in the traditional hand-drawn style which takes forever to do, so it would be somewhat expected that they’d make a few mistakes along the way. I don’t think CGI animators have quite the same excuse.
It's very saddening to see Disney become such a soulless corporate entity. You know they're too far gone when something as monumental as the 100th anniversary film is an effortless cash grab. You'd think that a major anniversary film would be more about celebrating the company's history rather than about just selling merch, but it's pretty clear that Disney cares more about money than their own history, even to the point they save money by putting less effort into their work. The idea of doing that for a 100th anniversary project is borderline unthinkable, and yet here we are.
disney made wish using drawings
Lol
Impressive
Our drawings
Some could say it was made with OUR DRAWINGS
@@tacoboy5602are you from ohio or something?
I said it once and ill say it again.
Once Upon a Studio is a MUCH better celebration of 100 years of Disney then whatever slop Wish is.
Actually...no Wish is a good celebration of 100 years. It perfectly represents Disney's bad corporate decisions throughout the years.
Right
Wish represents a milestone in Disney's downfall.
"You either die as a hero or live long enough to become a villain"
Looks like 100 years is enough for that
@@KorbAgain it's just igers fault
@KorbAgadumbin nope. Disney did both.
I watched a review and the reason why it feels like an ai movie is because that the movie knows what’s in a Disney movie but doesn’t know why it’s in a Disney movie.
This is a much better phrasing of what I should have said. I tried a puzzle piece analogy but that is much simpler and better
@@BeyondDrawingsbtw in my opinion wish was not bad. I haven’t seen all of the Disney movies so I wasn’t like I Disney person. I was more of a Pixar person. But strangely enough I enjoyed the movie and I don’t know why. Maybe it was because I had a good day when watching it, maybe it was because of the colours, maybe it was because of songs which I liked btw. I really don’t know. But I think the film wasn’t bad. It was harmless. It’s a 6/10. That’s my opinion btw.
@@Legomoviefan2008probably because it isnt really "bad" but it is so incredibly mediocre it isnt worth remembering, which is very ironic for a 100 year anniversary movie. It is just a movie, not an actual work of art that countless people put their hearts into.
Random rant! People nowadays just cant have anything be outside the categories of either "Amazing!!!" or "Horrendeous, god is dead". It's a weird internet thing - "mid", which actually means mediocre (or used to) is internet slang for dogshit. Controversy is the internet 'thing' going on right now, so dont think about peoples opinions too much! Keep judging art by your own heart and preferences.
@@man5262 In a lot of ways being forgettably mediocre is often worse for a piece of media than being so catastrophically awful that it sticks out in your mind, because the awful works actually leave an impact and get attention for it
As a smarter man than me once said (possibly paraphrased): "Be good, be bad, just don't be boring."
Funny, that's kinda like what Mysterious Mr. Enter says in his review for this movie
Wish is a movie from wish
Omg yassssss
LMAO
@@WingsofFirefan-zn7hu yasssssssss💅👙👨🦲👣😍👹🐺😻🗣️
No its from the dumpster 🗑️
Xd I was watching a vid 2 days ago and they said that
To be fair, as a DnD player I can assure you, if there is anything a wizard can't do, it's lifting heavy shit.
What like lifting the planet?
@@etherealbladerx8153 No, like... lifting a table.
@@gazelle_diamond9768 oh are wizards weaker in DnD than they are elsewhere like Harry potter and The hobbit?
@@etherealbladerx8153 ...no, in fact, they're much more powerful than whatever Rowling dares call "wizards" and the TLotR universe barely ever really showed any big instances of wizards casting spells.
They're just... usually weak on the physical side. They might be able to use a high level spell to lift something heavy... but they need to cast that first, which will be difficult when you're buried underneath a shelf.
@@etherealbladerx8153 Not necessarily... but usually. DnD has six ability scores (strength, dexterity, constitution, intelligence, wisdom and charisma) which demonstrate how good you are. Broadly, most characters will have a couple stats they want and some they don't. Most wizards want intelligence because that's how they cast spells, dexterity since that makes them harder to hit (and they really don't want to be) and a little constitution. Not having a positive wisdom leaves you vulnerable to mind control and other nasty effects. So it winds up that a lot of wizards will have lower strength and charisma.
I work in a store and we couldnt even sell the toys. Some ended up being 50 cents and no one wanted them! Theyre not even worth 2 quarters.
I saw the movie itself on clearance. I think it was bundled with some other bad movie they made that flopped.
My cat enjoyed the Star plushie my little cousin had. He pretended to care, but he actually just bought it FOR the damn cat.
@@Regigigas_YTat least the cat is getting enjoyment out of this failure of a thing
i work at party city and we got a whole bunch of wish costumes, party favors, balloons, etc. sold none of it. not a single child wanted a wish birthday. no one gave a fuck about it
@@IdioticOracle lol
“I believe I have just been threatened” is something I say when someone threatens to punch me or smth and I don’t take them seriously at all 💀
No I had to PAUSE the movie and write that down in my notes, like oh I'm bouta make fun of this later
this can be funny if it is said by the right character
would've been funny if it was shown as sarcastic
I think it would’ve been better if the next line immediately after that was “You *have* just been threatened.”
It’s sad that this was supposed to be the grand 100th anniversary movie
Yeah
Disney had more of a glow DOWN over the past century. And you can really see the depressing state of this once pioneering studio right in this soulless “film”. Disney films now are straight up on par with illumination SLOP.
Well, at least we still have Once Upon A Studio.
That was the real celebration
It didn't even feel grand, it just feels like a slow decay and rotting over time, which is what Disney is in right now
And this movie was beaten by an animated Netflix Adam Sandler musical movie about a tuatara helping fifth graders with their inner turmoil.
And rightfully so.
Fun fact @@setaramohamad4235, both films shared at least two Hebrew voice actors: Daniel Magon (who voiced sappy and the minotaur horse) and Gilad Kletter (who voiced John and squirtle).
@@shacharlem4424I was about to semi correct u by saying Adam’s Sandler but he’s just jewish
Leo?
Exactly the film @@VENTlLATION.
at 3:38 asha's hair clips into her arm. this movie is the most low-effort slop i've seen disney ever produce and that's saying something.
oh my god. this movie's budget was in the millions. how did NO ONE catch that. it's so blatant too.
My god I can see it so clearly now
I can't unsee it now, how the hell didn't anyone notice it 😂😂😂
yes and people went CRAZY when frozen came out and elsa's braid very subtly clipped through her arm during let it go
LOOOOOOLLLLLLL
I feel like they DID write it with chatgpt, and then were supposed to come out and say "you know this movie right? did you know we wrote it using AI? isn't that so cool?" but it flopped so hard they were embarrassed to do it
And they also realised that absolutely no one would be surprised
Honestly though. 100 year anniversary, let’s make an advancement
They used wish as a testing ground to see if they could make more AI stuff
They also used ChatGPT to animate because 3:35 and 3:39 the stuff clip into the clothes💀
@@Yuriartist_124thats just bad animation
"Marvels dialogue writing" _is_ disneys writing. That only ever started with Disneys acquisition.
Since 2009 then?
@@KKPlaysGD no, Since like phase 2 onwards. Probably 2013 but I dont remember for sure
@@fgvcosmic6752 Funny, Disney's acquisition was in 2009, not 2013. Only the first Iron Man wouldn't have "marvel dialogue writing" if it was truly Disney's fault.
@@KKPlaysGD Actually, a quick search shows that until 2015, it was not run by disney at all and was simply bought out. Hell, it technically wasnt Disney, it was under the Walt Disney Company. And until 2012, the movies were distributed my Marvel themselves.
@KKPlaysGD You phrase this as if it is farfecthed. But Ironman 1 is absolutely the only Marvel movie with no Disney dialogues. Watch it again. It's like watching a whole different franchise.
They now seem too scared to create a classic Disney romance now??? Like we were supposed to have a love story between Asha and the Star Boy AND a villain couple! (I don't remember if they've ever made a villain couple before). We haven't had a classic Disney romance since Tangled! which was 14 years ago!!!
The problem is that they would rather put Lgbt shit in their movies rather than normal straight romance
AAAAAAAAAAAAAESAESSESS6RED7TRRFTRFYTG NEED ROMANCE
OMG WISH THAT HAPPENED!!! I WANTTT A FUZZY ROMANCE MOVIE NOWWW!!!
@@ArandompersonD YOU AND ME BOTH SIBLING IN DISNEY
a villain couple would be badasssss, especially if they had the twist of only knowing one villian ahead of time, then meeting second villian while like escaping or something and they do the classic "oh honey we got visitors" and cue villian 1 entering from behind them to playfully grab their waist and kiss their cheek before capturing hero!
The problem is, wish was advertised as a movie with no twist villains… except Magnifico IS a twist villian, just revealed much earlier in the 1st act. Not to mention Simon… Simon is the DEFINITION of a twist villian…
Ty for mentioning Simon
..........who is simon
@@icenovice Asha’s friend who betrays Asha in the third act by joining magnifico and becoming a “villain…” I mean, that is LITERALLY A TWIST VILLAIN, DISNEY!
Well, technically Asha's a twist villain, too since she's a bit selfish and doesn't quite seem to learn her lesson. Which is so ironic since she's meant to be the protaganist.
@icenovice
Example 1 of why Wish didn’t work
And to think it could’ve been so much better. The star was supposed to turn into a cute boy!
Ikr, I heard he would have been mute and communicate through sign language. Missed opportunity tbh.
@@Azure0003 Dang! For Disney being so in looooooooove with DIVERSITY (skin color preferably) they could've represented different disabled groups!
Woman getting a (male) love interest is nowadays a big NONO in the house of mouse. They are supposed to be strong, independed woman who dont need a man and focus on their own carriers, remember?
@@lisaerk8487okay, but they can be strong, independent, goal/career-oriented women while still having a love interest. I mean, both Mulan and Tiana did it.
@@user-iy3nt5mm2v you dont need to remind ME, I know that. In my eyes ALL the disney princesses are strong in their own way! Its DISNEY who needs a reminder but they are at a point that they seriously believe a woman ending up with a man or wanting romance is anti feministm and makes her weak. Feminism is supposed to mean "equality between woman and man" but disney listens to twitter activists who think it means "woman are better then man in every single thing they do, they dont need a man or romance, except if its lesbian romance and man suck anyway." Disney lost its magic a long time ago. The focus is on delivering "the message" and not to entertain their customers anymore and then start to insult said customers as bigots, homophobes, racists, woman haters etc. if they dont show up in the cinema to watch their newest activist movie and it bombs at the box office!
I'm convinced at this point that Disney has completely forgotten the adage
*SHOW,*
*DON'T TELL*
Also, I agree, the animation looks kinda weird, almost seems unfinished. Definitely looks far less appealing than Coco or Moana... or The Incredibles...
It feels like an unfinished/incomplete render.
@@HelghastStalker I agree
Someone else pointed it out in the comments but you can see the mc's hair clipping through her shoulder at points
Agreed - it’s also supposed to be watercolour style but that’s barely noticeable.
*DON'T SHOW,*
*TELL*
I think this is the only movie where the roles are reversed. Asha is the Villain and the King is the misunderstood hero.
Seriously, it really doesn't help that with the backstory they gave the king, I'd actually do what he did too.
@@Yellow6182 you are a king of your land and people. You come from a place of violence and mistrust despite having a humble and decent upbringing. You wish for a land to call your own and grant those under you their desires so no one else would have to burden the hardships you saw during your youth, thus you study hard ALL your life in the art of magic to do so. You craft the kingdom of your dreams, with people coming from all around the world to be your citizens OF THEIR OWN FREE WILL…and the only thing you ask of them in order to become a citizen of your nation (with all its benefits) is to give up their dream/ideal/goal in the hopes that it would be made reality by the Sovereign (you). You live a long and prosperous rule of multiple generations (90 years minimum), kept alive by the fruits of your labour of magic and decide to gently give the reins and responsibility of wish granting onto an apprentice (while still being the ruling sovereign yourself). You teach her the fundamentals of what you know and she asks you a request: Her grandfather is turning 100 and wants to have his wish granted. You find the grandfather's wish and understand that it’s far too vague of a wish to grant: “I wish to inspire the next generation.” How COULD you grant that? Inspiration is a powerful thing, almost as powerful as magic. To inspire the next generation in such a vague and misunderstood way would gamble the fate of the entire would, such great feats of good and evil would be committed in the name of his inspiration. You tell this as such to your apprentice and break it easy to her that cannot in good conscience grant her grandfather's wish, and so she rushes off into the woods in a rage. You are a bit miffed yourself, how could she speak and act that way to you? Her king and master? The next thing you know, you hear news of her wielding a foreign magic that can also grant wishes. You understand from your long studies that magic being used this freely could have disastrous consequences, especially since it’s a magic that you don’t understand and thus a threat to your rule. You gather your citizens and ask of them for the first time to do a request and they would be granted their wish/dreams freely (depending on what the wish is). You then retreat to your study, and open a book that you swore you wouldn’t open unless it was an emergency. You would protect your kingdom from this threat, but have your morales lacking in exchange. Eventually there is a confrontation and you are cast into a mirror by your dear wife, the one you trust the most. You are forever bound to servitude and slavery just for protecting your kingdom you made. And the apprentice? She goes on to be the only wish granter, despite saying that magic shouldn’t be bound to just one person…the hypocrite. And her first wish granted? A world where there are no humans and that animals rule.
@@Yellow6182 king magnifico: "people are bad, they took everything from me and I almost lost my life too" asha: "GRANDPA AND ROSAS PEOPLE GOOD. GIVE BACK WISHES."
FR
I honestly forgot this movie even existed... it should of stayed in the drafts
I only saw the trailer monthes ago and didnt even bother watching it
This movie actually had tons of potential and could have been good if execs didn't meddle during production.
Tbh it feels like this movies writing was a draft but the 100th year anniversary would happen before they could actually finish it so they just went “oh it’s good enough-“ and got their workers to finish the animation
Erm… not to be that guy but erm… uhm… uhh… the correct grammar is actually “should HAVE” ☝️ 🤓
@@user-1dkWhYuc5R3-ab0ut_m3he was referring to OP writing “should of” instead of “should’ve (should have)”. Marioboi323 was just correcting bad grammar of the original comment.
Well, there was one animal sidekick that actually was pivotal to the plot, and that was Mushu.
Though yeah, I hate that they tried to make the star marketable instead of a hot star BF. They wanted to sell a plush... that now no one wants.
What gets me is that THEY COULD HAVE HAD BOTH. Starboy was supposed to SHAPESHIFT 😭😭😭😭
@@bubblybobabubbles COULD YOU IMAGINE THE SHEER PROFIT THEY'D GET FROM KIDS AND THIRSTY ADULTS?!
It's like they're allergic to the money they desperately want!
And as much as I’m a sucker for romance, it would’ve been cute if they were just really good friends. At least give him a presence on the screen and a purpose other than as a cute (marketable plushie) sidekick
No taxes, no rent, no poverty, no hunger; he grants wishes if he knows they won't do harm. But everyone, including his wife, turns on him because he doesn't give everyone their wishes.
if everyone had gotten their wish:
"i wish the sun exploded"
"i wish the queen would love me"
"i wish everything i touched turned to gold"
@@gramfero "i wish i could grant wishes"
we gotta revive our boy Walt DIsney, no not the corporation or company, i mean the FOUNDER of Disney and lets watch his reaction.
fr
He would shut down the company and start from scratch with a new board of directors who actually give a damn about the animation medium... IMMEDIATELY
He’d go “uugh, wheres Hitler?”
@@ava4689 there is no way that all translate to English did with your comment was correct 1 grammar mistake
If Walt Disney was born today he’d be a baby.
3:38 That hair clipping into her shoulders, I'm not entirely convinced that ChatGPT didn't animate it either.
to be fair for that scene, it was an unfinished animation for a deleted scene. Had that scene wasn't deleted and had been finalized in the film, there wouldn't be any clipping happening cuz it would be refined/fixed in the finished film.
thank you for giving me nightmares
It would've been better if the main character herself was the twist villain.
They should have done a Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs where she is both the hero and villain, like she convinces the king to give everyone wishes but then mean people start abusing that power and she realizes that giving people such power is not good
Jesus why did they make the scene where the king gets sucked into the staff so horrifying?
I'm not sure if anything he did was bad enough to make me "wish" this on him.
They animated that first and then tried to write a story about why he was defeated
@@BeyondDrawings That would not surprise me.
Nice pfp d00d
I think payed chatgpt would have done a better job than this, pretty sure they used the free chat gpt lmao
Can confirm. I’ve played around with ChatGPT (for personal amusement purposes only) long enough to tell.
lol i asked chatgpt to make a disney movie for its 100th anniversary and chatgpt literally came up with nearly the exact same thing disney did
"I'll take that as a yes" is absolutely a normal idiom... but yeah "I believe I have just been threatened" sounds Ai simplified.
It sounds overly formal, which can work if it’s meant to be humorous - especially if it’s poking fun at British people, or having a posh/stereotypical British character with matching stereotypical dialogue (think C3PO from Star Wars), but this isn’t what Wish was going for.
@ShintogaDeathAngel no .. I have regularly and casually heard and used "i'll take that as a yes" for decades
People: "AI IS GONNA REPLACE ARTISTS AND WRITTERS"
Meanwhile when a mega corporation tries to make a film that replaces real writters and artists with AI: "riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight....."
"Gonna" is the operating word. As the absolute fastest improving technology on the globe to date, it's ridiculous to think that it would be incapable of doing the one thing it was made for in like 10 years max.
@@Mechablizz "Absolute fastest improving technology on the globe to date" is such a bold claim
@@RomanCigićespecially when it's been proven ai is actively dismantling itself because its recycling it's own content to make worse versions of the already bad ai generated content.
@@MechablizzIt's obvious that it will in less than 10 years but now in 2024 it can't
No matter how fast it is improving though, by its design it will _never_ be original, so maybe the flaws will be covered better but it's never going to generate something we haven't seen before a thousand times, because it's trained on precisely that kind of stuff. At least not until it becomes fully sapient and by that point I guess it really would be deserving of artistic merit since it's a full person capable of inventing its own stuff.
Bad songs, bad animation, bad villain, bad dialogue, bad choreography, bad references, poor character interaction and development, and a vague message. This is too long of a list for it not to 100% be the producers’ fault. They have sole responsibility over most of these high level concepts and should provide constructive criticism to the director and various leaders throughout each of these processes to ensure the film development is economically driving towards a finished product that will be financially and critically successful. Somehow, this creative process has been destroyed at Disney, squandering capital and talent.
The animation in Wish is secretly fantastic in isolation. It's the post-processing and storyboarding that are terrible. The actual movement of characters is peak animation execution, masked behind a paint of shit decisions.
But a lot of people struggle to distinguish the quality of CGI from horrific director decisions. Because an incredibly skilled artist's execution of a shit idea ends up looking like shit, and no amount of skill can salvage it.
@@AmarantiStellar I think someone also mentioned in an production analysis that the techniue in lighting itself with a lack of shadows also hindered it.}
It was intended to look like those cartoonish lighting spheres, but looked out of place in a 3D enviroment.
The animation has some pretty obvious flaws in it too. At 3:37 you can see how her hair literally clips through her shoulder. That might sound like a nitpick, but if it was _that_ obvious to me, how did no one else on the editing team catch it!?
@@bugjams to be fair for that scene, it was an unfinished animation for a deleted scene. Had that scene wasn't deleted and had been finalized in the film, there wouldn't be any clipping happening cuz it would be refined/fixed in the finished film.
3:20 that man's shoulder is literally clipping through the cape
Omg It does that's hilarious 😂
Literally only thing i can remember from this movie is how the mc sucks, and the villain is somehow the actual good person. And his song is the only banger song
You can't have Chris Pine voice a character without him being unintentionally very attractive. It's the power of Chris Pine
It’s low key pretty lazy that Disney now is now focusing on sequel movies instead of new and different movies
Just because a movie doesn't appeal to you doesn't mean it was made by AI.
Why bother wasting time making a new movie that might not even sell when you can just stick with what can?
High key lazy.
@@fantasticfreddie5I don't see why this reply was under this comment, but if it was about the video, there are many good points why it was.
you guys when Disney makes original films: BOOOOO
you guys when Disney makes sequels: BOOOOO
I WISH this movie didn’t exist 😒
You sound like a guy. Seems like you weren't the target audience so why you complaining?
@@suezcontours6653even the target audience is dissapointed
@Buzzinga-but-fancy MSM fan spotted
@@BeMeebzy hey HEEEY, another anniversary month monster i see
@@kyanartz hi!!!!
The movie is like a book adaptation but the script is literally the dialogue
The entire movie feels like the rant of an entitled brat. You have a villain singing "I let you live here rent free." That sounds like something a parent would say to their child. And a spoiled brat would see them as a villain, where as most adults would see that as a rightful owner yelling at a free loader or child.
Also the plot of the movie seems like a bad moral. It's the opposite of Bruce Almighty where if people got everything they wish for bad things would happen and they wouldn't really be happy. Or like in Megamind where the wrong person gets super powers and becomes a villain.
It is the king's land, so that let them live their rent free is not really a villain line but instead someone who is completely within their right. Imagine if instead of wishes it was what's for dinner. You let some people stay are your house for free and they can make suggestions on what should be for dinner but some are just bad like a kid wanting cake for dinner or other such thing. But being your house and fitting the bill for dinner you get the final say on who's pick they go with. Now that same entitled kid starts a rant because she thinks she should get cake for dinner and everyone else should get what they want even if it's unreasonable. So they tie you up and lock you in the basement of your own house. The story is about an entitled brat of a Villain overthrowing a kingdom.
Depends on the age of the kid, I think. I got occasional “look how much money I’ve spent on you” kind of lectures when I was still too young to get a job, and they weren’t in the moment responses to me acting entitled, either.
This movie might be on the level of Our Drawings
🔥🔥🔥 BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD
IT’S A SONG WITHOUT A CHORD 🔥🔥🔥
wrist waters on my neck
Beatboxing puppy
Are you from Ohio or something?
Art Style #72: Reversal Of Time
I WISH this movie didn't exist
Not funny.
*knee slap*
Didn’t laugh
Very funny
Did laugh
This joke is done to death dude. We get it.
“Asks a question, sees a thing and says “I’ll take that as a yes!” Who does that?”
Me.
I do that.
Unironically.
1:56 Didn’t Know Those Star Things From Mario Galaxy Were In This Movie But Ok Disney 💀💀💀
“Lumas”
“Alright board, we have no ideas let’s use AI.” I just can not imagine that meeting
"Alright board, if we use AI we don't have to pay any writers." How about that meeting?
The goat being able to talk was actually relevant to something: the budget to hire another voice actor.
DUDE IS HER HAIR NOCLIPPING THROUGH HER SHOULDER?! 💀💀💀💀 3:40
NAW THEY SO LAZY THEY CANT EVEN ANIMATE HAIR
3:20 the old guy’s shoulder thing is clipping with his arm too😭
I guess this movie was also animated by AI.
to be fair for that scene, it was an unfinished animation for a deleted scene. Had that scene wasn't deleted and had been finalized in the film, there wouldn't be any clipping happening cuz it would be refined/fixed in the finished film.
The movie would still be trash however
3:33 old guys cape clips through his body
First time I see this shit in a "high budget" animation
Having a cameo from a grown-up Peter Pan is *very* modern Disney lol.
it must be insane to have written a whole movie script an it's so bad to the point it's been accused of being AI generated 😭
the concept art from the book "The Art of Wish" was amazing but I think the directors pushed more to just getting references. It's so obvious that the duet between Asha and the King was the original love song between Asha and human Star. She was supposed to be a stern character, star was the goofy side but they combined the characters and it didn't work out omgngdhghfd
honest to god i dont think people would complain if disney did a remake of wish with its original concepts 😭
Being AI has little to do with the quality of the script. There are things shown in this very video that people will pick up on and shout “AI!”
Disney no longer puts romances in their movies due to adult women blaming their older movies for giving them unrealistic dating expectations. I've figured it out. If you notice, no modern (non-remake) Disney movies have any romantic plot. That's for when this generation grows up, they have no media company to blame for not getting laid!
i mean to be fair, remastering the grimms stories was probably not a good idea for kids movies that teach "lessons" thru the characters. i mean og sleeping beauty was SAed and gave birth to twins while asleep... disney just made her get kissed without even knowing dude was doing it sooo, not as creepy but still gross to teach kids that it is cool to do that.
They don't put it into their movies because they want 'strong female characters' without putting in effort.
Even though it used to work just fine.
Example: Tiana from the Frog Prince is an actual strong female character who also finds love.
It was concerning to a point, but the fact that Disney keeps making any trend is a problem in the first place. Both are true at once. You can’t expect immediate romance all the time (which is what a little girl will conclude unless told otherwise) but some couples really do just hit it off. It’s both. Rather than just do one or the other until it’s overdone, Disney could have just offered a variety of ways people find each other.
Tangled did the romance pretty well, especially when they followed through with the series and showed the ups and downs of a relationship...
And then we never got something after that
*cough* Elemental *cough*
"You can't just announce how the characters are feeling! That makes me feel angry!!" - Robot Devil Futurama
The implications of it being written by humans are probably even worse than if it were written by chatgpt tbh
They named the movie after the website they hired the scriptwriters from
Gottem
I cried in the last seen and not in a good way
i forgot the protagonists name while watching this
back when the movie was in cinemas, I went with a friend on it and after that our friendship ended.
4:44 That's an issue I noticed current movies in general have. Waaay too much dialogue. There's nearly no nuance, no letting the scenes speak for themselves. Nope.
I think people are giving humans more credit than they are worth. Especially corporate.
Here's how the board meeting probably went:
"What does Disney stand for?"
"Making wishes come true"
"How do we make sure to appeal to everyone?"
"Make all wishes come true"
And no one thought about wish contradictions, so the very foundation was broken, and it all just spiralled from there
I remember being super happy happy see that there would be a Disney movie where the protagonist had my name (i don’t see a lot of people/characters with my name) and then being thoroughly disappointed, and instantly dropped my stupid 12 year old dream of having the story I created be produced as a movie by disney. Im upset now.
Your name is very cool!
@@graycatsaderow thank you! :D
whyd you hit me with the baseball analogy ive just finished reading the complete peanuts and im going insane from the baseball strips
"I hate baseball sir"
I'm constantly forgetting that this movie exists
ngl this would’ve been better if magnifico forced people to give up their wish and/or he was torturing people behind the scenes
9:24 imagine 3d characters looking more flat than 2d characters...
For a second I thought you were joking with the “I let you live here for free and don’t even make you pay rent” I was shocked to find out that line is real XD
And now they can’t even make a new original movie
They are just making sequels
1:35 - Ok... wait... really?
This same logic can be applied to ANY story.
Fooly Cooly - A girl lands on earth and after she starts hanging out with Nandaba family stuff starts getting weird. Naota along with the robot that grew out of his forehead work together to fight threats. Eventually the find out that a lot of these threats stem from some power from deep space chasing Haruko (the girl). There are some things that happen in the middle but those are goose chases to get to those three points.
Wish is a bad film but your 'analysis' of it, is pretty surface level.
Nastiest backshots at 8:24
8:51 bro it’s eh-pit-oh-me
After watching this video, I wrote a script for a Disney animation with AI, just out of curiosity. With very little guidance, I just gave the AI a few information about the theme and so on, and it wrote a script that was 100 times better. Even GPT 3.5 isn't as bad as this.
their "Peter Pan" is like when I create Sims based on fictional characters, yeah it looks nothing like him...
This is off-topic, but I am very passionate about it. Epitome is the stupidest word in the english language. It's written 'epitome' and pronounced 'apidemy', like what the hell???? Like bro, you're telling me 'ep-i-tome' is pronounced 'ap-id-emy'???? Hell nawww man
@@WilburAndACrazyPen I be pronouncing it as “eh pih tohm” just to be silly sometimes, cuz ya that’s a funny word
Haha. I agree. Dont even get me started on “Yacht” or “bologna” how does bologna= Buhlone-ee
i spell the word throuought wrong just to spite the english language
It's not the word that's stupid, it's the language.
Colonel = kernel
Phlegm (why is there a g?) = Flem
Bologna = Balloney
Yacht = Yat
Worcestershire = worstersher
The video title gave me the impression that it was literally confirmed Wish was made using Chatgpt.
Isn’t Disney like…the default theme for “cartoon” when using GenAI?
8:49 Did he really pronounce “epitome” as “e-pi-toe-m” 💀💀💀
Yea, ikr. I remember pronouncing it like that as a kid
looked for this comment as soon as I heard it lol
@@zucc4764 Me too lol
That would be how it should be pronounced without any exceptions. Unfortunately, English has a tendency to steal words from other languages and not change the spelling or pronunciation. So for this particular word, you basically need to switch to speaking Latin for one word before switching back to English.
I have a suggestion for Magnifico: keep his he created the kingdom Story, but make it because he wants Power. He settled down as King but oh- Star- a Potential threat. Scared of this New possible foe, he turns to dark magic, which he used back then to create the kingdom. This dark magic then Returns him to the old King who only sought Power, and he finds out he can become much more powerful than ever before by sucking the magic out of his citizens, thus causing some side effect. Plus he Puts on a curse that makes everyone be unable to leave so he can keep harnessing their magic energy. Villain song: him singing about how he wants more and more and he can't have enough, while mc sings about how she has everything she needs. Direct contrast between the two.
FORGET THE FIRST PART WHERE I WAS TALKING ABOUT WISH, NEW MOVIE TIME.
Boom. Villain starts doing his mischief to mc's people because he Expanded his Power beyond his own kingdom. Mc goes to his kingdom, Sees what happened, thus filling her with even more determination to get rid of the King. In the climax, the hero somehow defeats the King by Turning his own magic against him. SOMEHOW. I might be cooking. I might be bs-ing. Either way, it's my idea. Don't know what that means, but I said it
This movie being released on disney's 100th anniversary is a HUGE DISSAPOINTMENT
2:32 “The ability to speak does not make you intelligent.”
The first Disney movie with a villain protagonist
There's no way i just got an ad for wish while watching a video about how bad wish is. And i hadn't seen an add from disney in a while.
Ads aren't random. They are selected based on your watch history and what video you're on
And any other data Google has on you
It's not the worst, it just made us had too much hype before it gets released
D-did bro just say epi-tome?
Jkjk good video!
It sucks too cause I remember when it got announced I was like “Okay, the concept is interesting at least” having a movie based on the trope of the wishing star is at least unique. Then the movie dropped and it was like “oh, it’s one of THOSE movies” lol
I love how in stores you always see wish merch never being sold. I remember there was this end cap that just had toys and it was there for months. Nothing on that end cap even moved.
Just with how generic it is, def AI. Look at it, it doesn't have any unique designs and all the architecture doesn't match very well. My mother even pointed out the blurry backgrounds (she doesn't know what AI is) and said that she thought they were messed up in production. I paused it and checked, def AI, no consistent details and everything is too washed out.
9:52 I think AI stole that from Disney but okay
The lighting looks like it’s unfinished
i love how they literally paint the king as a bad guy when he's a good guy with good motives
8:49 uh-PIT-uh-mi, not EH-pi-tome
Right? That's ridiculous.
You're never gonna guess what movie was in the Disney+ ad I just got
I read it "i made memes using chatgpt" and i sat there wondering what wish has to do with it 😂😂😂
Imagine making an animated musical with song lyrics that are so bad that people are still talking about it almost a year after its release
I WISH we got the original version from the deleted scenes/storyboards
The fact the crowd cheered when Kurt said he was a drug abuser…
Huh?
@@Dawg347 it seems like my comment from another video ended up here for some reason. Oh well
@@CamInABand video name?
Heck, anything would make this movie more interesting
I hate YT because I know what happened here
Daaaaang! That was the most awesome articulation of Checkov's gun I've ever heard and you didn't even use thr phrase. It's not about making sure A leads to B later, it's about making sure B feels earned.
the movie feels kinda like an audio book for a picture book lol
I don't know why but Nick going feral in that Zootopia scene has always gave me the heebie jeebies...
Fangs.
3:36 Asha's hair casually going thru her shoulder like its thin air
If you watch a super old disney movie, I think its Aristocats, theres a scene where a woman goes to feed an apple to a horse. Except theres no apple in her hand. So the horse leans down, and a crunch sound plays as the horse bites thin air. When I saw it for the first time I was like “what did that horse just crunch on, her pinky finger?!”
@@ava4689 lol
Lol
Happened in Frozen too in one scene during "Let it Go".
@@ava4689except that movie was animated in the traditional hand-drawn style which takes forever to do, so it would be somewhat expected that they’d make a few mistakes along the way. I don’t think CGI animators have quite the same excuse.
This was the cause of Disney doing budget cuts the original plan was much better than this example star was going to be an actual kid
It's very saddening to see Disney become such a soulless corporate entity. You know they're too far gone when something as monumental as the 100th anniversary film is an effortless cash grab. You'd think that a major anniversary film would be more about celebrating the company's history rather than about just selling merch, but it's pretty clear that Disney cares more about money than their own history, even to the point they save money by putting less effort into their work. The idea of doing that for a 100th anniversary project is borderline unthinkable, and yet here we are.
What makes this guy good is that he mentions the used music in the description
You never gotta deal with the comment "song?" with no replies
Did you say EPI-TOME 😭 8:50
Good video jokes aside lol
I watched this movie and was like: “Disney….I think it might be time to fire ChatGPT from your workplace
We W I S H that wish was good
The movie is the embodiment of the ‘the floor is made out of floor’ meme
8:00 that's not what Chekhov's gun is you got it backwards. It's "if a gun is shown in the first act it must be fired in the second"