"IT DOES MAKE A DIFFERENCE" at Microsoft Flight Simulator

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 22

  • @SayIntentionsAI
    @SayIntentionsAI 4 місяці тому +4

    Great video - thanks for the showcase! Noticed the weather response giving a metar. Just got that fixed for future folks. Cheers!

  • @johannberger9630
    @johannberger9630 4 місяці тому +2

    Here he is again! Our great Sim-Flight-Newsreporter Chickamagalur! Creator of the best SimFlight-Channel in the Universe! Thank you for another important news-video. Love`n peace my friend Chickamagalur!

    • @johannberger9630
      @johannberger9630 4 місяці тому

      "Radiokoch" 😂 this meant you are cooking radios. You wrote "Check" wrong in the translator.

    • @simflightpro
      @simflightpro  4 місяці тому +2

      Oh my! I didn’t realize koch meant that, 😄, I hope the next time I get it right

  • @Owen-mt4si
    @Owen-mt4si 4 місяці тому +1

    I tend to use the default atc, it is not the best, if they could fix 3 things I would be much happier with it.
    1st on a IFR flight sometimes it asks you to descend at 1200ft/min+ to about 2500ft then asks you to climb almost as fast to get over the mountain it is vectoring you into.
    2nd I wish if I manually tune a radio to a known tower frequency it would select that airport nearest dialog box, (like it did in FSX) Your forced to activate the nearest airport dialogue box for it to give you dialog options. (I built a replica GNS 530, so all my tuning is manual or off the airport info page.)
    3rd being able to reset it after the atc gets confused and stops working.

    • @VNAV_PTH
      @VNAV_PTH 4 місяці тому

      I mean...I haven't used the default ATC since...the beginning of time, but seriously, does it really state the climb or descend rate you are supposed to follow? That's ridiculous.

  • @marathi22
    @marathi22 4 місяці тому +1

    ENGM Gardermoen - how do you think the Aerosoft version compares to the ORBX faring?

    • @simflightpro
      @simflightpro  4 місяці тому +1

      Aerosoft is very detailed and manages fps at the same time. Orbx is good too, but the details in Aerosoft is another level.

  • @52sadanand
    @52sadanand 4 місяці тому +1

    Great update

  • @snatr
    @snatr 4 місяці тому +1

    I think this system is way to laggy to be useful. I wouldn't mind playing around with it a bit though. I've already purchased Beyond ATC and have my hopes set on that. They got a lot of work to do on that yet though 😏

    • @simflightpro
      @simflightpro  4 місяці тому +2

      Hi Snatr, the response time is usually between 8 and 12 seconds. You should give this a try though. I haven’t tried Beyond ATC, I’m sure it’s good as well. It’s good to see such growth in ATC tbh.

    • @Tom__L
      @Tom__L 4 місяці тому +1

      Radio Chefck was acknowledged as radio chef, not Check 😄 Radio Check in German is pronounced similar to english.

    • @SayIntentionsAI
      @SayIntentionsAI 4 місяці тому +1

      ​@@Tom__L This made us laugh pretty hard 🤣

    • @SayIntentionsAI
      @SayIntentionsAI 4 місяці тому +1

      "Radiokoch" amazing

    • @simflightpro
      @simflightpro  4 місяці тому +1

      @@SayIntentionsAI Silly me! Radiokoch. Lol

  • @ukar69
    @ukar69 4 місяці тому +1

    Anything has to be better than the inbuilt ATC. I use it only as a last resort on long flights. Having been a private pilot you see how lacking it is.

  • @mikecoffee100
    @mikecoffee100 4 місяці тому +1

    This was Awesome Thank You

  • @grahamjantz3867
    @grahamjantz3867 4 місяці тому +1

    I'll be going with Beyond ATC.

    • @imflyboy_
      @imflyboy_ 4 місяці тому +1

      Why BeyondATC over Say intentions?

    • @alfredorosales419
      @alfredorosales419 4 місяці тому

      I bought both, after use them, I requested a refound for BATC, Say intentions is like speak with another person.