I hope everyone enjoyed this new video we finally released with Ron Wyatt narrating a tour of the ark site. Please don't forget about our new website and the $20/month donors we are looking for: www.noahsarkscans.com/donation-levels/ God bless!
@@Stevepdv Sadly I don't have any idea on that. If we had someone who could do a voice-over or closed captioning text for this video we would put it up.
It's so amazing to hear Ron's voice while seeing through the lens of modern technology. TY for continue to give our brother Ron the credit which is his due. May it be counted to him, and you, as righteousness.
The natural rainbow has 7 colours. The rainbow as it's been commandeered today has 6. In Heaven, I don't know how many colours the rainbow has - more than we can fathom right now. It must go on for miles. Just observations.
I used to clean carpets back in the late 80's into the early 90's. One of my customers was man named Dave Deal. He was pretty well know in the Vista, CA area doing art for local hot rod shows posters and T'shirts, he did the art and design of the comical Revell plastic models back in the day and he helped with the creation of the characters in the pixar/Disney movie Cars. Very interesting dude. The best thing he ever shared with me is he and his colleagues were some of the 1st people back then to inspect this sight. He even wrote a book on it but not sure it was ever published because back in the day it was illegal for people to cross Turkey's borders. I had a copy of the book but of course it was lost when I lost my storage unit. I really miss Dave one of the most interesting dudes on this planet. Rest in peace my friend.
Just noticed that Dave's book is still up on Amazon... (Noah's Ark - the Evidence: Untying the Knott of the Gordurian Mountains) I used to live in Alabama many years ago. My introduction to Noah's Ark happened when a very close friend of Ron Wyatt came and spoke at the church I went to in Birmingham. His name was Corky Bell and he and Ron both ran a ministry in Gatlinburg, Tennessee called the 'Passion Play In The Smokies'. After listening to Corky's message I KNEW without question that Ron and Corky were legit and everything they said was 100% true. FYI I grew up in Fallbrook, Ca.
@@Halakah7 good to know thanks for letting me know I'll have to look it up. I lived all over North County after moving down from Orange County. I graduated from Ivy High above Fallbrook High in 92.
How About, Going To The Real Noah's Ark Site. And Expecting It. It's The Best Proof, I've Ever Seen. Ron Wyatt, Who I Love. Is Taking Credit, For Someone Else's Find. And is Find, Is Just Another Boat. Like Ark Insight's Boat. My Research Has Uncovered Three Different Boats.
Ron Wyatt is a charlatan. Don't put your faith in him. Even this presentation was full of B.S. like pointing at a rock outcropping and calling it a timber or a metal bracket.
Awesome! What convinced me was a chance meeting with a very close friend of Ron (Corky Bell) in Alabama years ago. After listening to Corky for an hour, there was no doubt he was for real.
The issue I have is that how can the Ark be in two places at once ? Mount Ararat and here ? The frozen rooms etc on the mountain and then this boat-shaped area elsewhere. Wishful thinking does us no good in an archeological setting. A great many archeological biblical discoveries have been made to prove the Bibles word is true. Yet we should realize what is and what should stay a mystery. The Ark should not be a mystery because it's such a beautiful, yet controversial subject.
Has the resurrection happened yet? If he's in front of God, Israel should be home and Judgement Day would be over. He is not in heaven before God. He sleeps awaiting THE resurrection.
why is this not being excavated? is this petrified wood we're looking at? seems like a lot of questions could be easily answered here.. am I missing something?
Yeah, funny isn't it? He says there's ' way enough evidence that this is a boat. But doesnt provide any other than his conviction that it looks like a boat.
Wood that could have been trees at the time, the whole area kinda like looks the same in geography...This is just years of natural erosion nothing more.
@@cbdwarfer9492 Your "experts" are anything BUT experts. Stop listening to liars and you just might find the truth... FACT: Everyone who tells you Ron Wyatt is fake has no clue... My source is a chance meeting with a very close friend of Ron Wyatt (Corky Bell). FYI he didn't try to convince me, but I KNEW he was telling me the truth...
11) Has any petrified wood been tested? "Firstly, it is worthy to note the Aramaic root word for the Hebrew word translated “gopher wood” means laminated wood (this is when layers of wooden boards are glued together one upon another to provide extra strength). The deck Timber Analysis. When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does! The test results: The result was that it contained .71% total carbon. Inorganic carbon totalled 0.0081%. It contained .7019% ORGANIC CARBON - almost 100 times more organic than inorganic."
Let me Google that for you... 11) Has any petrified wood been tested? "Firstly, it is worthy to note the Aramaic root word for the Hebrew word translated “gopher wood” means laminated wood (this is when layers of wooden boards are glued together one upon another to provide extra strength). Plywood in ancient Egypt Jean-Phillippe Lauer, in his book Saggara: The Royal Cemetery of Memphis, makes this statement concerning the knowledge and use of laminated “plywood” in very early Egypt. “…..within the remains of a coffin whose sides were made of six thin superimposed layers of wood with the grain alternating as in modern ply wood.” (P.99 . Pub. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York) As we have stated earlier, an actual specimen from Noah’s Ark, presumably a piece of deck board is made of laminated (plywood). The use of the same method by the early Egyptians proves that this knowledge was available in the early years of Ancient Egypt, passed along undoubtedly through Noah’s offspring as they begun to settle throughout the world. It would probably stagger the imagination if we knew how much technology was lost by man after the Flood. In October 1984, when the Turks sent their own team of archaeologists to the site, their expedition yielded very positive results. Apart from four-feet long metal spikes and other metal objects, they recovered PETRIFIED WOOD. Then, on June 20th, 1987, Ron Wyatt had a day that he would never forget. A great discovery was about to occur. Governor Sevket Ekinci of the Turkish province of Agri issued instructions that the American crew was to stay upon the hill. They were not to film the event - it was his. He allowed some journalists, a Turkish cameraman, some members of the military, and other dignitaries only, to witness the next events. Setting up the radar, Ron made several passes. Explaining the printout to the group with one of his liaisons, Mine Unler, translating, he noted that one particular reading appeared to be very near the surface. The Govenor then ordered one of the soldiers to dig at the location Ron had indicated, which he did. There soon emerged what looked like a flat rock. As more dirt was removed, it could be seen that it was about 18 inches long and it was then removed. The sample was three feet under the surface. It took 30 to 40 minutes to retrieve. All captured on film, it was obvious that it was petrified section of a hand-hewn timber! Everyone was stunned, but most of all, Ron. For nearly 10 years, he wanted to excavate but had never been allowed to retrieve anything that was not on the surface. His dream had come true! Not only was it a section of a timber, but it was almost perfectly preserved, showing the wood grain and perfect symmetry. The Governor then did something that could only be directed by a Divine Hand - he told Ron to take it to the States and have it tested. The entire event was shown throughout Turkey on TRT (Turkish Radio and Television). The deck Timber Analysis. When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does!"
sory im late but here is something, When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does! The test results: The result was that it contained .71% total carbon. Inorganic carbon totalled 0.0081%. It contained .7019% ORGANIC CARBON - almost 100 times more organic than inorganic."
Yes, that's right. And it would have no use for a rudder. It was a barge with a draft of about 70% which would make it very hard/impossible to be turned over by humongous waves!
@@haggismcbaggis9485 I disagree. A boat shape is more stable with or without power. It may have a had a fixed rudder or fixed sail like the “Are Encounter “ portrays. That would keep it pointed into the wind. That said I am not convinced that Wyatt is correct on this being the Ark..
The Bible just gives its length, breadth and height, like someone would for any normal boat. It's too bad that this curious new theory that it might have been rectangular went from a theory to being considered as true, when it's not in the Bible. Now, it COULD have been intended to be pictured as rectangular, I suppose, but that's human guessing and supposing, not scripture! Genesis 6: 14 Make for thee an ark◦ of gopher wood; with◦ rooms* thou shalt make the ark◦, and shalt tar it inside and outside with tar◦. 15 And this is how thou shalt make it: three hundred cubits the length of the ark◦, fifty cubits its breadth, and thirty cubits its height◦. 16 A window thou shalt make to the ark◦, and to a cubit thou shalt complete it from above; and the entrance of the ark◦ thou shalt set in its side; with lowest◦, second, and third stories thou shalt make it. If a person got told in church that it was rectangular, then I could see them interpreting the scripture that way, but if they read it on their own without being told how to imagine it, most people would picture a normal boat. It's only recently that a couple creationists popularised the idea, and now it appears to have entered general Christian lore as a fact, people always asserting that it's the case without actually quoting the relevant scripture. I don't care whether you think it's rectangular, oval, eye- or almond-shaped. What I do care about is how scripture is represented, and there's just not even a suggestion about the particular shape of the ark, other than its largest dimensions in 3D space, and its three-level structure.
It’s amazing how a nurse is such a great archeologist! It just looks like a rock formation to me. If this was truly Noahs ark then it would be a huge tourist site making millions a year!
How many years has it been discovered for, ? and they still haven’t excavated it. I wonder why. Tutankhamen tomb was excavated the same day. They couldn’t wait to find out what was inside. They already claim it’s Noah’s ark without proof. People go there to see where Noah landed and released 20.000.000 animals. If it’s excavated and there’s sweet fanny Adam’s inside,they would have to admit it’s not where the Noah’s myth ended. That would be a massive egg on there faces.😂
There is a tourist site there near the structure. There is footage also of Ron shaking the hand of the leading Turkeyish archeologist of that time , they did a type of Christening of the Ark and they did metal detector footage. And took samples of the wood to experts for tree type and dating. It was a kind of wood the beavers made their dams with in the area where Noah made it. Your comment has no research behind it. Just mean spirited. And that is your whole purpose of being on this video.. the Haters are the cannibals and vampires and pedo rapist for wizardry. Shame shame. Try Jesus😊
@@angiebold2592 So they’ve built a visitor centre and the Turkish government have declared its Noah’s resting place🤦.Did you know wyatt also discovered the ark of the covenant 🤣. Even Christians don’t believe that one. It’s not shameful to demand that the site should be excavated.. Don’t you find it just a little suspicious that it’s been this long. No other find has EVER taken this long. Wouldn’t it prove things one way or the other🤷♂️. There’s on,y one reason why it hasn’t been excavated. Christian’s will take literally anything if they think it will justify there beliefs.Try evidence 🤭
@@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 The Bible is the word of God so a Christian will believe what it says. Secular archeology is there to try it's best to disprove the existence of God even to the point of blatantly lying about finds to deceive. Do you just believe it because a fallible human archeologist who can make mistakes said so?
There’s more videos of people looking into this. There’s a structure under the surface level that is made out of wood that’s evened out the whole way through, it’s like gaps, it’s like a skeleton on the boat before they began to cover the boat with wood. Look it up. This is no doubt a boat.
@@zozoprofessorofeverything3469 I got the info wrong but something like what I said. Watch this video and skip to the Noah’s ark park it explains it all.
@@bryanlovesjesus2204 No there isn't, experts in the late 50's took explosives to it and found it to be solid rock. How can you support a person like Ron Wyatt claim he found this when it was found May 19th, 1948. There is no expert that will sign off as this being the remains of the ark, they all dismiss it. After all you believe Ron is some expert...no he is an anesthesiologist, not trained in archeology at all. He isn't even an amateur in the least.
Ron said he had found stuff there but we haven’t done any survey work to try to locate the exact stuff he saw there. We’ve been up to the area but haven’t covered it all.
sorry im late but here is some info, When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does! The test results: The result was that it contained .71% total carbon. Inorganic carbon totalled 0.0081%. It contained .7019% ORGANIC CARBON - almost 100 times more organic than inorganic."
It's very possible that God gave Noah special knowledge on how to make iron just for the purpose of building a strong ship to ride out a horrible deluge
These folks will believe in anything without proof. Their need to believe in this outweighs their logic. Nevermind the fact Ron Wyatt has be proven to be a liar. I wonder if they'll ever go visit his museum which is closed permanently due to his false claims.
Actually this is a tightly-folded doubly plunging anticline. There are flanking rock exposures along side the "boat" which indicate the structural configuration. Sorry, bit this is NOT the outline of a large boat known as Noah's Ark.
My Wikipedia knowledge proves I'm smart. Dude we know it's rock and claims of metal and wood are probably bs but it's the right size and shape and what would be left from a 100000 year old boat anyway but rocks in a different shape
Are there photos of the metal brackets they found? It is a peculiar shape, but I would like to see more hard evidence of this being some kind of shipwreck in addition to this general aerial video. A LiDAR or ground penetrating or metal detector survey would show a great deal of information. Soil surveys could also show evidence of decomposed timber. Does that data already exist?
Metal detector tests taken numerous times over the years all reveal a very distinct organized pattern of metal beneath the surface, which is consistent with the shape of a large ship. Four intact metal rods have been discovered by the Turkish government, each measuring about 4 ft. or 1.2 m. in length. In June of 1991, an interesting object was discovered, which seems to be a large rivet with a washer around it. It was believed to fasten the large timbers of the Ark together. An analysis of the rivet object showed it was made of various metals such as titanium, aluminum, iron, and other metals. Interestingly, just centimeters away from the rivet object, there were no traces of iron in the soil. Aluminum never occurs in the metallic form in nature. The Bible affirms the knowledge and use of iron: "Zillah also bore Tubal-cain; he was the forger of all instruments of bronze and iron." -Genesis 4:22 Meaning Noah definitely had access to iron while building the Ark. During a radar demonstration, the scan showed what appeared to be a block. A Turkish governor ordered a soldier to dig where the block was, and a petrified piece of wood was uncovered. Thin sections have been cut from this deck timber for microscopic examination, It was later revealed to be organic in nature and appeared to be four layers of wood laminated together. This is believed by some to be part of a deck timber. Even more surprising were laboratory analyses which not only revealed that the petrified wood contained carbon proving it was once wood, but there were iron nails embedded in the wood! The Turkish government also claims they have found additional petrified wood at the site. Researcher Andrew Jones and lead scientist Dr. Fethi Ahmet Yüksel of the Department of Geophysical Engineering, along with Applied Geophysics Department of Istanbul University, believe that the results of scans indicate a man-made artifact beneath the surface that could well be the Ark, and are eager to continue studying the location. The team believes that the new GPR data shows parallel lines and angular structures 8 to 20 feet down and that these parallel lines and right angles below the surface are something you would not expect to see in a natural, geologic formation. creationwiki.org/Durup%C4%B1nar_site wyattmuseum.com/laminated-wood-on-noahs-ark/2011-685 discoveryupdate.com/discovery1.htm ua-cam.com/video/oQwfU7DvUyE/v-deo.html
Watching this video it dawned on me that with the big camera movements of the aerial drone you get gobs of parallax. This gave me the impression that these would make great immersive 3D videos. These shots give a better sense of the terrain and rolling topography of the landscape that is lost in the old grainy flat 2D photos that we were accustomed to seeing. It would be nice if someone gets good 3D and VR aerial footage to post here. I’m no expert but I think there are apps/software to convert standard video to 3D formats that you can view on your phone with those special Oculus type goggles. Thank you Andrew and thank you Ron for the great narration.
I seen the same 2level video yu seen. However i seen a video of someone inside and yu cud see a very dark wood. And this was a older video from late 70s or early 80s. I was just a kid being born in 1974 and my mom was a devout catholic. So even at that young age i knew the great significance of this ARC. My Mom was obsessed with stories of Jesus's Relics. The Arc, The Shroud, The Holy Grail, Geesh and more stuff cant remember at the moment.
To imagine, the water receding, the boat crashing out, the clouds folding back as God's will was set forth, what a biblically beautiful site to see with one's own eyes. Truly amazing.
I mean, you can see where it washed the boat in from the massive flood, the boat crashed there, and the waters all receded, the erosion, the evidence is there.
@@shanesimms3665 you only find good script like this there tho: leviticus 26 :27But if in spite of all this you do not obey Me, but continue to walk in hostility toward Me, 28I will act with furious rage against you, and I Myself will punish you sevenfold for your sins. 29You will eat the flesh of your sons and the flesh of your daughters. 30I will destroy your high places, cut down your incense altars, and heap your dead bodies on the remains of your idols; and My soul will despise you. 31I will reduce your cities to rubble and lay waste to your sanctuaries, and I will refuse to smell the pleasing aroma of your sacrifices.
The is a good video. Did you happened to attempt to measure end to end and side to side. Where is it located on a map? Maybe use some kind of radar detection to confirm the find? I would need more information to know if this is really true.
there the exact same sorry I'm late i did a little research its called Durupınar site if you want to look into it yourself god told noah to make a boat 300 cubits which is how big that boat is per multiple sites
@@Backpfeifengesicht45lo que te cuenta la biblia es que los animales que estaban en esa región se refugiaron en el arca. El milagro es que fueron en parejas. Los animales tienen un sentido y saben dónde puede ser un lugar seguro en situaciones de catástrofes naturales (tsunamis) no es que en el arca entró todos los animales del planeta tierra.
Why would a wooden boat still exist? How would it fossilize? I just don't think its possible, and what are the chances it is noahs ark as opposed to any other boat in all of history
When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does! The test results: The result was that it contained .71% total carbon. Inorganic carbon totalled 0.0081%. It contained .7019% ORGANIC CARBON - almost 100 times more organic than inorganic."
Agreed! If this was ANY kind of vessel people would’ve already completed the forensic work to confirm it and not just talk about what it looks like. They also definitely wouldn’t have been sending expeditions to the mountain to continue to look for it. Smoke and mirrors is all it is.
Are you claiming the wood turned into rock and dirt, wheres the close up footage of the material that makes up this formation, without that all we have is a shape of a ship nothing more
When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does! The test results: The result was that it contained .71% total carbon. Inorganic carbon totalled 0.0081%. It contained .7019% ORGANIC CARBON - almost 100 times more organic than inorganic."
I have seen aerial photos of some object sticking out of the ice that much more resembled the Biblical description of the Ark than this formation. I would be interested in the scale of the formation. That would provide important information.
It's in 2 pieces as the flood waters receded and time went by the weight of the boat caused it to crack the biggest part rolling and falling and landing at this site. You would have to measure both pieces which they did..
@@angiebold2592 Seriously. Well it doesn’t look like half a boat. If it was half the rock pattern wouldn’t look like a boat. I know something that’s a novel idea why don’t they do an excavation. I’ve never heard of such an important discovery that it still hasn’t been excavated. Probably don’t want to destroy the “ tourist” attraction🤭
sorry im a bit late but in the bibel god told noah to build a boat 300 cubits long which is exactly how big this boat we are seeing here is its called Durupınar site btw
This is exactly what made me start my journey to stop believing. You blindly accept something so willingly. This guy Ron Wyatt is no a train archeologist, and even trained ones who believe in god dismiss this as they know it is not through testing done since its discovery in 1949. Ron Wyatt's god was greed, the almighty $$$. After all lying is a sin, Ron says he discovered this, yet he could not have given it was discovered in 1949, it was named the Durupinar in 1950's after Turkish Army Captain Ilhan Durupınar who took pictures of it. The site was blasted and all they found was solid rock....if it was a boat of any sort it would have been hollow. Seeing someone like you act as you did, made me question the Bible, I then spent 5 years studying the Bible with an open mind....not one that displayed brainwashing... By saying what you have here it has had an affect on others, I can never tell people to think for themselves, but your actions help.
I’m confused. Can’t we just prove it by digging around everything to reveal it. Archeologists dig around complete ancient civilizations. Why hasn’t this been done yet. Come on, let’s see it and prove to the world Gods word is true!!
Some countries have laws set to where you cannot dig or if you are foreign you have to go through a laundry list of paperwork and people to even get permission to go and then dig.
@@NoteFlakez It's false. I can tell you that because much of mainstream archaeology and biblical scholars and Christians have rejected his findings as credible. Whether you want to believe Ron Wyatt actually discovered the Ark or not, i don't judge you for that, but he is still a fringe archaeologist according to the research I've done.
The surrounding ridges also resemble a boat shape too. Maybe this is just a very "boat shaped" pattern of rock erosion. Could also be an ancient Viking ship because we can't definitively say that is Noah's Ark on Mount Ararat, sorry.
Maybe, but to be fair the area was only written to have been under water once and that was during the world wide flood. During the time of the Vikings, Ararat would have been far above sea level. What's more it was written for centuries that Noah's ark landed on Mout Ararat. Finding any boat on that specific mountain would be singularly unique to Noah's arc.
Just to be clear, Genesis 8:4 says that the ark rested "on the mountains of Ararat." Ararat was the name of the region in Biblical times. During the Middle Ages, the volcano now known as "Mount Ararat" came to be associated with the Noah story -- understandable, since it's the tallest and most magnificent in the region, but it wasn't previously associated with the story, from what I can tell. The site in this video is about 20 miles from the current Mount Ararat, which is why many creationists don't like it -- they're pretty attached to current Mount Ararat being the true site, though there's nothing to suggest that it was considered Mount Ararat at the time the flood story was written down, or when it was included at the beginning of Genesis. And then there's the fact that the Hebrew says "mountains" instead of "mountain."
What scripture gives is merely its length, breadth, and height, like you'd do for any boat. If I said that the USS Constitution was a certain length, breadth, and height, you wouldn't say, "Ah, so it was rectangular!" The idea of it being a rectangular prism got popularized among a few creationists who are very adamant about it (perhaps because it's really important to them that as many animals as possible could've been housed in it), and I don't mind if they posit it as a guess or theory, but when they claim that scripture says it, I have to object. I checked 6 translations, and they all concur on the dimensions. Here's one that's particularly close to the Hebrew: Gen 6: 14 Make for thee an ark◦ of gopher wood; with◦ rooms thou shalt make the ark◦, and shalt tar it inside and outside with tar◦. 15 And this is how thou shalt make it: three hundred cubits the length of the ark◦, fifty cubits its breadth, and thirty cubits its height◦. 16 A window thou shalt make to the ark◦, and to▵ a cubit thou shalt complete it from above; and the entrance of the ark◦ thou shalt set in its side; with lowest◦, second, and third stories thou shalt make it. If someone told you before you ever read the Genesis account yourself, "It's a rectangular ship," I can see how you might read it pre-disposed to picture these dimensions as forming a rectangular prism, like you might do in math class in elementary school. But if you read it without already being told to picture it as rectangular, you'd do what almost everybody in the last several thousand years has done, prior to the last two or three decades when this pet theory came to be, and assume it's shaped like a normal boat -- e.g., eye- or almond-shaped. Now, it's possible that the writer of the beginning of Genesis wanted you to picture a rectangular-ish boat - who am I to say not? I don't know! - but it's a weird reading of the dimensions, like if someone told you the dimensions of a basketball and you drew it as a box instead of as a globe.
@@ayishas4385 I agree with your idea that there is much detail left out in scripture and some of that detail cannot be explained in mere words, but must be either drawn out as well, or seen and memorized. Take the construction of the tabernacle, the menorah, The ark of the covenant, The altar of incense, the table for showbread, the courtyard altar, the curtains, the cherubim on the covering of the ark, etc., none of these could have been made correctly from just reading the Scriptural account. Moses saw them on the mountain in the Heavenly realm.
When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does! The test results: The result was that it contained .71% total carbon. Inorganic carbon totalled 0.0081%. It contained .7019% ORGANIC CARBON - almost 100 times more organic than inorganic."
The "anchor stone" at Kazan is a fine-grained (0.001-1.0 mm) porphyritic volcanic rock in which phenocrysts (0.2-1.0 mm) consist of about 6% ilmenitic magnetite (a titanium and iron oxide containing some manganese) and about 29% plagioclase (andesine-labradorite). The very fine-grained ground mass (about 65%) contains plagioclase and ilmenitic magnetite, but with large amounts of ilmenitic magnetite than occurs as phenocrysts. The composition of this anchor stone is unusual because it lacks magnesium-rich minerals such as pyroxenes and olivine. All rock samples from the structure are pyroxene-bearing andesite or basalt partly altered to serpentine. Local calcite veins (3-5 mm wide) cut across the rock. Ilmenitic magnetite is a common accessory. The supposed "iron bracket" is composed of granules of limonite, some of which have sizes and shapes that match those of ilmenitic magnetite crystals in the andesite of the Ark, the anchor stone, and nearby peridotite. These granules are enclosed in a matrix of calcite, clay, quartz, and fragments of anthophyllite. Many limonite granules exhibit rhythmic concretionary layers. Rare veins of pyrolusite (MnO2) locally cut the limonite.
Only one problem, in the drone footage you can see several other structures that resemble the “ark” but are smaller. What are those suppose to be? And how about the very obvious rock structures that look almost identical to the supposed beams of the ark? It is human nature to see certain objects in rocks/rock formations. Native Americans would see many different animals in the sides of mountains or on the edge of cliffs. I have a rock that looks almost exactly like a frog, but I know it wasn’t a frog at one point. And it isn’t limited to rocks, people see famous people in potato chips and even Jesus in burnt toast. The phenomenon is called Pareidolia, and our brains are just wired to see familiar items in random stimuli. This is simply a rock formation that appears slightly like a boat, or a better way of saying it, this is a boat shaped rock formation. I believe in God, but I don’t believe this the ark
@@JamesSmith-gn9ou Your the only one that appears to be non thinking and gullible. This fella Mopar_Dude gave a concise but detailed analysis of the video and you response is "your going to be upset" That is the definition of a non thinking one dimensional response.
@@blusheep2 Obviously reading comprehension is not your strong suite. I was agreeing with Mopar that was not the Ark and his conclusion (the same as mine) would upset the one-dimensional non-thinkers who were viewing this video. What about that do you not understand?
D.H., No real span of time is given for building the ark. However, the Bible states that Noah was 500 yrs. old when he had his 3 sons, and 600 yrs. old when he ,and his, entered into the ark. So some time within that 100yrs. period it appears.....
there the exact same sorry I'm late i did a little research its called Durupınar site if you want to look into it yourself god told Noah to make a boat 300 cubits which is how big that boat is per multiple sites
It's so amazing to imagine 4 men building this huge thing themselves...everything by hand...even having to cut the trees and form the wooden beams, make every single piece needed by hand. Wow! No wonder it took so long. And Noah's faithfulness to God never faltered in all that time. We can learn a lot from Noah.
I don’t know of that many biblical scholars who believe it was built by four people alone. Besides the fact that they all had wives and probably children, there was also nothing barring them from hiring others to help them.
What I find hard to believe is how Noah would have had to go to all continents on the planet to get animals, birds, etc. How would he have been able to catch the animals and what would he have used to travel to all the continents? How would he ever have known where to even go to get the animals? None of it makes sense.
@@TimesUp777 It is one of the most fundamental parts of the story that the animals were made to come to the Ark, they did not have to be wrangled or found. They were acting on a divine mandate, which obviously overrides natural instinct entirely. It's possible that they made this journey in the form of a migration, (most scholars believe the world had a single super continent at that time) or that they were transported via spatial warping or some other supra-physical means. At the end of the day, that is among the least of our possible objections to the story.
@@reijishian2593 I have read that Noah's Ark happened 6000 years ago and if that is the case then I highly doubt there was 1 large super continent at that point in time. It's one of the stories in the bible that is kind of hard to believe.
You ever heard of petrified wood? You know wood does eventually turn to stone even in the elements. Ever heard of the Petrified Forest in Arizone. There giant trunks of trees that are not stone just lying around the National Park. It can take anywhere from 7 to 36 years for wood to actually petrify and become stone. So the fact that this structure is stone is not surprising at all.
When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does! The test results: The result was that it contained .71% total carbon. Inorganic carbon totalled 0.0081%. It contained .7019% ORGANIC CARBON - almost 100 times more organic than inorganic."
It’s a drone tour of some geological formation. I’m not sure about a boat though or an ark. Wild animals piled in together like that tend to start eating each other.
The bible said that the boat seated on the tip of the mountain where they see all waters around them. What is the highest form of land or mountain (Everest?) Could they have been stranded on the tip of that mountain while waiting for the waters to dry?
100% Pareidolia, zero physical evidence to substantiate the claim. You can also see the giant canyon in the southwest US where Paul Bunyun dragged his axe across the landscape
@next level tech if you think the world's population was inbred from Noah's sons families of the Bible then your an idiot!!!!! So is every other Christian that thinks the same thing.
He says the ark rested partly on the rocks and on the ground. They emptied it safely and it was sometimes later the hull timbers gave way and the rocks protruded through them. I don't know how long it took for this to happen. At a time months or years later? We don't know. There was no shipwreck but settling later as Ron said.
@@lizh1988 Ron Wyatt is a charlatan that has claimed to have found every major missing piece from Noahs Ark to the Red Sea crossing to blood of Jesus(recently.) He has no credibility, even amongst Bible believing scholars and historians. I wouldn't wrap to much up in the "findings" of this guy. Hes a joke. That doesn't mean Noah's ark story is untrue. This is a critique against the man. Not the Biblical accounts.
Nobody alive today was there people.. GENESIS 8:4; And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, "upon the mountains of Ararat". AMEN.
When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does! The test results: The result was that it contained .71% total carbon. Inorganic carbon totalled 0.0081%. It contained .7019% ORGANIC CARBON - almost 100 times more organic than inorganic."
I’m just not seeing it. Looks like the rest of the local geography. Wood takes more than 13,000 years to petrify, and no examples of crossbeams or anything else is given other than saying they are there. I want to believe it, but the evidence is not compelling enough.
It’s already a tourist attraction. It’s been years it been discovered. Can you imagine if they excavated and there wasn’t anything there. Big egg on there faces and no tourists. They are talking about it. Alway an excuse
Sorry, I don't see a "boat". I see nothing but rock formations and soil everywhere. If this is the Ark, why hasn't there been massive excavations to confirm it?
We have the same story in Hinduism. Noah is Manu here. The word Prophet is known as Prajapathi . Perhaps our ancestors migrated with Noah’s story from Armenia , turkey through Iran. Maybe this event is more older.
If the Bible is true, which I completely believe it is, then the story would have come down to you through generations starting with one of your ancestors on the boat. Noah would be all of our +great grandfather.
Used to feel bad when I was in school In south India when classmates used to tell you are not belonging to abrahamic religion. Now that we’re all related through Noah/ Manu , 👍 we’re cousins . I did live in turkey during teenage later. Always felt a strong connection with the place.
I’m a bit skeptical about this. Could it be the ark? Sure I suppose so but from the video it looks like a roughly boat shaped mound formation. I’m not entirely convinced that it was actually a wooden boat and not just a natural anomaly or a built mound site like serpent mound or something that resembles a boat perhaps even to commemorate the flood and ark occasion. When he says they pulled Timbers and metal brackets out of the supposed sides of the boat he doesn’t show this evidence which is something I’d very much like to see if it is in fact true. And also what is his explanation for the giant rock in the middle again I’m not buying that the whole thing just landed there and the sides are pretty much perfectly intact shape wise and then the entire bottom is just gone somehow seems to me it’d be buried but the rock suggests otherwise at least to me but who knows
I'm a LOT skeptical of this! Why not take samples that can be analyzed in a lab to prove what they actually are? Anybody can point at a rock formation!
@@timnewman1172 Quote... 11) Has any petrified wood been tested? "Firstly, it is worthy to note the Aramaic root word for the Hebrew word translated “gopher wood” means laminated wood (this is when layers of wooden boards are glued together one upon another to provide extra strength). The deck Timber Analysis. When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does! The test results: The result was that it contained .71% total carbon. Inorganic carbon totalled 0.0081%. It contained .7019% ORGANIC CARBON - almost 100 times more organic than inorganic."
there the exact same sorry I'm late i did a little research its called Durupınar site if you want to look into it yourself god told noah to make a boat 300 cubits which is how big that boat is per multiple sites
There is no doubt in my mind that this is, in fact, the real Noah's Ark. The overall shape of it and the fact that the colors and deposits are so strikeing against the natural layout of the surrounding landscape that this is enough alone to support my belief.
Thanks for the video, which I enjoyed. I'd only ever seen still photos of this site before. However, watching the video has reinforced my original suspicions that this is not the remains of a boat at all - just a naturally occurring rock formation.
Sooooo, the dynamite thing seems a little crazy.. But given the historical weight of such a phenomenal find it's just baffling why a mini excavator hasn't been hauled up there and start gently digging around until zero doubt remains as to whether it's a boat or not🤷🤷🤷 Paleontologist spend their life scratching around for a few bones, how is it possible this doesn't peak more interest?🤔
it has occurred to me that the ark was dismantled and the material used to build homes for the four families on board. It would have taken years for new forest to grow...maybe they used it for fire wood as well...just saying...
I agree. They would have been more advanced in years and had the wisdom to use the wood from the ark to build and use for energy. It would be a waste to let all that wood just sit there. If Noah and his family didn't use it, surely someone else would have. I'm a believer, but I don't believe there is any evidence of any of the ark that still exists. It would have only taken a couple of generations for the wood to be all used up. I believe Answers in Genesis or Institute for Creation Research has articles that talk about this on their websites. As Christians, we really want people to find pieces of the ark so that it provides evidence for our faith but if we never do, it doesn't make our faith less valid or true.
When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does! The test results: The result was that it contained .71% total carbon. Inorganic carbon totalled 0.0081%. It contained .7019% ORGANIC CARBON - almost 100 times more organic than inorganic."
@@blusheep2 that’s odd that they wouldn’t allow it. I mean, even Muslims believe in Noah’s ark. The Quran calls him “Nuh” instead of Noah, but Sura 11 talks about the same ark and great flood. I would think they’d be interested in this site too, but who knows…
@@ErikStone1 Actually, this was originally the site Muslims claimed was the resting place of the ark. They were saying this while Christians were claiming it had been found on Mt. Arat by someone else. Muslims have a history of restricting studies that may prove them wrong in the long run. That being said, I don't know if they have definitely done so here. There may have been numerous studies allowed here but when the scientists arrived they realized right away that there isn't anything to find.
I hope everyone enjoyed this new video we finally released with Ron Wyatt narrating a tour of the ark site. Please don't forget about our new website and the $20/month donors we are looking for: www.noahsarkscans.com/donation-levels/ God bless!
All glory be to the Most High. Thank you Jesus!
good work that honors Jesus!
When will the Spanish translation? Great video
@@Stevepdv Sadly I don't have any idea on that. If we had someone who could do a voice-over or closed captioning text for this video we would put it up.
How much has the base been hit with GPR? If I'm not mistaken the haul was ripped off by mud flow where it initially came to rest
It's so amazing to hear Ron's voice while seeing through the lens of modern technology. TY for continue to give our brother Ron the credit which is his due. May it be counted to him, and you, as righteousness.
Amen 🙏
I love how it was a rock that made the boat come to a rest. Jesus is our Rock
Your head is a rock. Is your head Jesus? Hmmm.
No ,it’s a rock 😂
I believe that rock is between your ears
@@Fidelio3rdEye very true, He is always on my mind
@@bentonvillefamily at least you have a place where your fantasies exist.
🌈🌈this rainbow is a symbol of His promise not what it has been represented today, Noah’s ark is proof.
Amen
🙏🏿
The natural rainbow has 7 colours. The rainbow as it's been commandeered today has 6. In Heaven, I don't know how many colours the rainbow has - more than we can fathom right now. It must go on for miles.
Just observations.
Your Rich Aunt….Proof of what exactly,The story is a complete fabrication so what does a Myth prove??
Correct.
I used to clean carpets back in the late 80's into the early 90's. One of my customers was man named Dave Deal. He was pretty well know in the Vista, CA area doing art for local hot rod shows posters and T'shirts, he did the art and design of the comical Revell plastic models back in the day and he helped with the creation of the characters in the pixar/Disney movie Cars. Very interesting dude. The best thing he ever shared with me is he and his colleagues were some of the 1st people back then to inspect this sight. He even wrote a book on it but not sure it was ever published because back in the day it was illegal for people to cross Turkey's borders. I had a copy of the book but of course it was lost when I lost my storage unit. I really miss Dave one of the most interesting dudes on this planet. Rest in peace my friend.
Just noticed that Dave's book is still up on Amazon... (Noah's Ark - the Evidence: Untying the Knott of the Gordurian Mountains) I used to live in Alabama many years ago. My introduction to Noah's Ark happened when a very close friend of Ron Wyatt came and spoke at the church I went to in Birmingham. His name was Corky Bell and he and Ron both ran a ministry in Gatlinburg, Tennessee called the 'Passion Play In The Smokies'. After listening to Corky's message I KNEW without question that Ron and Corky were legit and everything they said was 100% true. FYI I grew up in Fallbrook, Ca.
@@Halakah7 good to know thanks for letting me know I'll have to look it up. I lived all over North County after moving down from Orange County. I graduated from Ivy High above Fallbrook High in 92.
How About, Going To The Real Noah's Ark Site. And Expecting It. It's The Best Proof, I've Ever Seen. Ron Wyatt, Who I Love. Is Taking Credit, For Someone Else's Find. And is Find, Is Just Another Boat. Like Ark Insight's Boat. My Research Has Uncovered Three Different Boats.
I remember Dave from the Revell days. Thanks for the memories!
@@RealNoahsArkThe one in this video is the real Noah's ark.
Seeing one of the Biblical relics strengthen my Christian faith more fully...thank you Ron Wyatt.
Ron Wyatt is a charlatan. Don't put your faith in him. Even this presentation was full of B.S. like pointing at a rock outcropping and calling it a timber or a metal bracket.
Except you didn't. Look up the explorers that went INSIDE the ark that is on the mountain.
At a time like this it’s so refreshing to see Gods fingerprints so clearly. 🌈 (God’s promises not the Devil’s distortion)
Umm he is not god he is a special man of god
@@syedafajarzehranaqvi915 NOWHERE DID I SAY HE WAS GOD! Learn to read.
@Jay Only fools say in their hearts, “There is no God.” They are corrupt, and their actions are evil; not one of them does good! Psalms 14:1
🙏 🙏 🙏 Amen
This was proven to not be the ark, this guy is a fraud. Oh and God doesn't exist if he did he should be shot for crimes against humanity
I met Ron Wyatt brother 2 days ago and he introduced me to Rons discovery....
Awesome! What convinced me was a chance meeting with a very close friend of Ron (Corky Bell) in Alabama years ago. After listening to Corky for an hour, there was no doubt he was for real.
Ron was a blessed man but the God of Israel did all this. Stay blessed and strong everyone.
I can not wait to get to heaven and finally get to see all of God's absolutely amazing handy work !
Bible says no man has ascended to heaven except Christ
No need to wait
no disrespect but that is wrong two people actually went up besides him Elijah and Enoch sorry I'm late btw@@billstetler6769
@@billstetler6769 LOL
Why not witness it here?. The Creator's handiwork is everywhere.
Does anyone ever notice how he claims that wood timbers & metal brackets are found in this pile of rocks but never shows them ?
Yes they do its in the muesum that the build not far from it you need to go there
There is a full video of this discovery you should check it out. This is just an overview
Keep searching his videos and you will see the petrified wood timbers and brackets
ua-cam.com/video/oQwfU7DvUyE/v-deo.html
You need to check your heart because you’re winded !
Jesus made the blueprints for this epic epic amazing boat. Wow
No he didn’t
He wasn’t alive yet
THIS isn't it. It was found on Mount Ararat. Keep looking, the video is all over.
The issue I have is that how can the Ark be in two places at once ? Mount Ararat and here ? The frozen rooms etc on the mountain and then this boat-shaped area elsewhere. Wishful thinking does us no good in an archeological setting. A great many archeological biblical discoveries have been made to prove the Bibles word is true. Yet we should realize what is and what should stay a mystery. The Ark should not be a mystery because it's such a beautiful, yet controversial subject.
I’m very sorry to hear of his passing but I also think about the joyous time he’s now having in the presence of our Lord!
He sounded very out of breath. Very sad.
Has the resurrection happened yet? If he's in front of God, Israel should be home and Judgement Day would be over. He is not in heaven before God. He sleeps awaiting THE resurrection.
why is this not being excavated?
is this petrified wood we're looking at?
seems like a lot of questions could be easily answered here..
am I missing something?
Yeah, funny isn't it? He says there's ' way enough evidence that this is a boat. But doesnt provide any other than his conviction that it looks like a boat.
Wood that could have been trees at the time, the whole area kinda like looks the same in geography...This is just years of natural erosion nothing more.
All you're missing is the fact that this has long since been identified by experts to be nothing more than a natural rock formation.
@@cbdwarfer9492 Your "experts" are anything BUT experts. Stop listening to liars and you just might find the truth... FACT: Everyone who tells you Ron Wyatt is fake has no clue... My source is a chance meeting with a very close friend of Ron Wyatt (Corky Bell). FYI he didn't try to convince me, but I KNEW he was telling me the truth...
Go to Ron Wyatt’s page and there’s an entire 2 part video about all the scans they did and what they had found.
Where is the proof that this is Noah's Ark?
Are you blind and deaf?
Absolutely none.
How anyone can doubt the authenticity of this? Lord I believe
Heal my disbelief
How? Just a little critical thinking. It doesn’t mean one is an atheist.
Amen.
It's pretty easy to look at a rock formation and think "hmm... looks like a rock formation."
You should try it sometime.
What are the dimensions of the formation? At what elevation does it sit?
Just look up Ron Wyatt, Noah's ark. There is a ton of info on it.
I have an open mind, but have chemical tests been performed on the areas mentioned? That would tell us if there is wood residue.
What would be even better. They should do a proper excavation. I wonder why they haven’t done one.
11) Has any petrified wood been tested?
"Firstly, it is worthy to note the Aramaic root word for the Hebrew word translated “gopher wood” means laminated wood (this is when layers of wooden boards are glued together one upon another to provide extra strength).
The deck Timber Analysis.
When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does!
The test results:
The result was that it contained .71% total carbon. Inorganic carbon totalled 0.0081%. It contained .7019% ORGANIC CARBON - almost 100 times more organic than inorganic."
Please post some pictures of the fossilized Timbers and hardware. I can’t seem to find anything on that.
Because they don't exist...
Let me Google that for you...
11) Has any petrified wood been tested?
"Firstly, it is worthy to note the Aramaic root word for the Hebrew word translated “gopher wood” means laminated wood (this is when layers of wooden boards are glued together one upon another to provide extra strength).
Plywood in ancient Egypt
Jean-Phillippe Lauer, in his book Saggara: The Royal Cemetery of Memphis, makes this statement concerning the knowledge and use of laminated “plywood” in very early Egypt. “…..within the remains of a coffin whose sides were made of six thin superimposed layers of wood with the grain alternating as in modern ply wood.” (P.99 . Pub. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York) As we have stated earlier, an actual specimen from Noah’s Ark, presumably a piece of deck board is made of laminated (plywood). The use of the same method by the early Egyptians proves that this knowledge was available in the early years of Ancient Egypt, passed along undoubtedly through Noah’s offspring as they begun to settle throughout the world. It would probably stagger the imagination if we knew how much technology was lost by man after the Flood.
In October 1984, when the Turks sent their own team of archaeologists to the site, their expedition yielded very positive results. Apart from four-feet long metal spikes and other metal objects, they recovered PETRIFIED WOOD. Then, on June 20th, 1987, Ron Wyatt had a day that he would never forget. A great discovery was about to occur. Governor Sevket Ekinci of the Turkish province of Agri issued instructions that the American crew was to stay upon the hill. They were not to film the event - it was his. He allowed some journalists, a Turkish cameraman, some members of the military, and other dignitaries only, to witness the next events. Setting up the radar, Ron made several passes. Explaining the printout to the group with one of his liaisons, Mine Unler, translating, he noted that one particular reading appeared to be very near the surface. The Govenor then ordered one of the soldiers to dig at the location Ron had indicated, which he did. There soon emerged what looked like a flat rock. As more dirt was removed, it could be seen that it was about 18 inches long and it was then removed.
The sample was three feet under the surface. It took 30 to 40 minutes to retrieve. All captured on film, it was obvious that it was petrified section of a hand-hewn timber! Everyone was stunned, but most of all, Ron. For nearly 10 years, he wanted to excavate but had never been allowed to retrieve anything that was not on the surface. His dream had come true! Not only was it a section of a timber, but it was almost perfectly preserved, showing the wood grain and perfect symmetry. The Governor then did something that could only be directed by a Divine Hand - he told Ron to take it to the States and have it tested. The entire event was shown throughout Turkey on TRT (Turkish Radio and Television).
The deck Timber Analysis.
When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does!"
sory im late but here is something, When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does!
The test results:
The result was that it contained .71% total carbon. Inorganic carbon totalled 0.0081%. It contained .7019% ORGANIC CARBON - almost 100 times more organic than inorganic."
also he has his own museum with more evidence there
Why is the narrator out of breath did he just climb Mount Ararat? And where's the boat? I don't see a boat anywhere 🤔
The ark was not a shape of a boat. It was in the shape of a huge oblong, a large wooden chest, designed to float.
Yes, that's right. And it would have no use for a rudder. It was a barge with a draft of about 70% which would make it very hard/impossible to be turned over by humongous waves!
The bible doesn’t indicate either way but the boat shape makes the most sense.
@@charliejones5430 No, it does not make the most sense as it had no means for propulsion. So, there would be no bow or stern to the ark.
@@haggismcbaggis9485 I disagree. A boat shape is more stable with or without power. It may have a had a fixed rudder or fixed sail like the “Are Encounter “ portrays. That would keep it pointed into the wind. That said I am not convinced that Wyatt is correct on this being the Ark..
@@charliejones5430 However, I do also concede that a rectangular box floating on water would not have sufficient lines for being seaworthy.
Where is the entrance to the 2nd. deck located? There is another video where a photographer is showing pictures of the timbers from the 2nd deck.
Only problem here is Noah's Ark wasn't shaped like a normal boat/ship.....
It was rectangular even the Bible describes it that way......
The Bible just gives its length, breadth and height, like someone would for any normal boat. It's too bad that this curious new theory that it might have been rectangular went from a theory to being considered as true, when it's not in the Bible. Now, it COULD have been intended to be pictured as rectangular, I suppose, but that's human guessing and supposing, not scripture!
Genesis 6: 14 Make for thee an ark◦ of gopher wood; with◦ rooms* thou shalt make the ark◦, and shalt tar it inside and outside with tar◦.
15 And this is how thou shalt make it: three hundred cubits the length of the ark◦, fifty cubits its breadth, and thirty cubits its height◦.
16 A window thou shalt make to the ark◦, and to a cubit thou shalt complete it from above; and the entrance of the ark◦ thou shalt set in its side; with lowest◦, second, and third stories thou shalt make it.
If a person got told in church that it was rectangular, then I could see them interpreting the scripture that way, but if they read it on their own without being told how to imagine it, most people would picture a normal boat. It's only recently that a couple creationists popularised the idea, and now it appears to have entered general Christian lore as a fact, people always asserting that it's the case without actually quoting the relevant scripture.
I don't care whether you think it's rectangular, oval, eye- or almond-shaped. What I do care about is how scripture is represented, and there's just not even a suggestion about the particular shape of the ark, other than its largest dimensions in 3D space, and its three-level structure.
@TC-kf9zw Chapter and Vs please...
It’s amazing how a nurse is such a great archeologist! It just looks like a rock formation to me. If this was truly Noahs ark then it would be a huge tourist site making millions a year!
How many years has it been discovered for, ? and they still haven’t excavated it. I wonder why. Tutankhamen tomb was excavated the same day. They couldn’t wait to find out what was inside. They already claim it’s Noah’s ark without proof. People go there to see where Noah landed and released 20.000.000 animals. If it’s excavated and there’s sweet fanny Adam’s inside,they would have to admit it’s not where the Noah’s myth ended. That would be a massive egg on there faces.😂
There is a tourist site there near the structure. There is footage also of Ron shaking the hand of the leading Turkeyish archeologist of that time , they did a type of Christening of the Ark and they did metal detector footage. And took samples of the wood to experts for tree type and dating. It was a kind of wood the beavers made their dams with in the area where Noah made it. Your comment has no research behind it. Just mean spirited. And that is your whole purpose of being on this video.. the Haters are the cannibals and vampires and pedo rapist for wizardry. Shame shame. Try Jesus😊
@@angiebold2592 So they’ve built a visitor centre and the Turkish government have declared its Noah’s resting place🤦.Did you know wyatt also discovered the ark of the covenant 🤣. Even Christians don’t believe that one. It’s not shameful to demand that the site should be excavated.. Don’t you find it just a little suspicious that it’s been this long. No other find has EVER taken this long. Wouldn’t it prove things one way or the other🤷♂️. There’s on,y one reason why it hasn’t been excavated. Christian’s will take literally anything if they think it will justify there beliefs.Try evidence 🤭
@Purr-fecto ! Do you also believe that there are other global myths that pre date the Noah myth or do you just believe because it’s in the bible 🤷♂️
@@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 The Bible is the word of God so a Christian will believe what it says. Secular archeology is there to try it's best to disprove the existence of God even to the point of blatantly lying about finds to deceive. Do you just believe it because a fallible human archeologist who can make mistakes said so?
Looks like a natural formation.
The fact that's it's literally made from earth and rocks is kind of a give away too.
There’s more videos of people looking into this. There’s a structure under the surface level that is made out of wood that’s evened out the whole way through, it’s like gaps, it’s like a skeleton on the boat before they began to cover the boat with wood. Look it up. This is no doubt a boat.
@@bryanlovesjesus2204 is there? No one ever showed that! I wonder why
@@bryanlovesjesus2204 no evidence ever produced of wood or iron.but everyone needs something to believe in so , I'll say no more.
@@zozoprofessorofeverything3469 I got the info wrong but something like what I said.
Watch this video and skip to the Noah’s ark park it explains it all.
@@bryanlovesjesus2204 No there isn't, experts in the late 50's took explosives to it and found it to be solid rock. How can you support a person like Ron Wyatt claim he found this when it was found May 19th, 1948.
There is no expert that will sign off as this being the remains of the ark, they all dismiss it.
After all you believe Ron is some expert...no he is an anesthesiologist, not trained in archeology at all. He isn't even an amateur in the least.
Any survivors onboard this natural rock formation?
Are there any remains of the Ark still at the original landing site?
Ron said he had found stuff there but we haven’t done any survey work to try to locate the exact stuff he saw there. We’ve been up to the area but haven’t covered it all.
Yes there are!
sorry im late but here is some info, When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does!
The test results:
The result was that it contained .71% total carbon. Inorganic carbon totalled 0.0081%. It contained .7019% ORGANIC CARBON - almost 100 times more organic than inorganic."
Where's that Ark you supposedly found?
turky called the Durupınar site sorry im late
I’d love to see the iron bracket… made in the bronze age.
🤣
It's very possible that God gave Noah special knowledge on how to make iron just for the purpose of building a strong ship to ride out a horrible deluge
These folks will believe in anything without proof. Their need to believe in this outweighs their logic. Nevermind the fact Ron Wyatt has be proven to be a liar. I wonder if they'll ever go visit his museum which is closed permanently due to his false claims.
Actually this is a tightly-folded doubly plunging anticline. There are flanking rock exposures along side the "boat" which indicate the structural configuration. Sorry, bit this is NOT the outline of a large boat known as Noah's Ark.
lol
My Wikipedia knowledge proves I'm smart. Dude we know it's rock and claims of metal and wood are probably bs but it's the right size and shape and what would be left from a 100000 year old boat anyway but rocks in a different shape
Are there photos of the metal brackets they found? It is a peculiar shape, but I would like to see more hard evidence of this being some kind of shipwreck in addition to this general aerial video. A LiDAR or ground penetrating or metal detector survey would show a great deal of information. Soil surveys could also show evidence of decomposed timber. Does that data already exist?
Some helpful info in this video: ua-cam.com/video/IoTkguzRaCU/v-deo.html
Metal detector tests taken numerous times over the years all reveal a very distinct organized pattern of metal beneath the surface, which is consistent with the shape of a large ship.
Four intact metal rods have been discovered by the Turkish government, each measuring about 4 ft. or 1.2 m. in length.
In June of 1991, an interesting object was discovered, which seems to be a large rivet with a washer around it. It was believed to fasten the large timbers of the Ark together. An analysis of the rivet object showed it was made of various metals such as titanium, aluminum, iron, and other metals. Interestingly, just centimeters away from the rivet object, there were no traces of iron in the soil.
Aluminum never occurs in the metallic form in nature. The Bible affirms the knowledge and use of iron:
"Zillah also bore Tubal-cain; he was the forger of all instruments of bronze and iron." -Genesis 4:22
Meaning Noah definitely had access to iron while building the Ark.
During a radar demonstration, the scan showed what appeared to be a block. A Turkish governor ordered a soldier to dig where the block was, and a petrified piece of wood was uncovered. Thin sections have been cut from this deck timber for microscopic examination, It was later revealed to be organic in nature and appeared to be four layers of wood laminated together. This is believed by some to be part of a deck timber. Even more surprising were laboratory analyses which not only revealed that the petrified wood contained carbon proving it was once wood, but there were iron nails embedded in the wood! The Turkish government also claims they have found additional petrified wood at the site.
Researcher Andrew Jones and lead scientist Dr. Fethi Ahmet Yüksel of the Department of Geophysical Engineering, along with Applied Geophysics Department of Istanbul University, believe that the results of scans indicate a man-made artifact beneath the surface that could well be the Ark, and are eager to continue studying the location. The team believes that the new GPR data shows parallel lines and angular structures 8 to 20 feet down and that these parallel lines and right angles below the surface are something you would not expect to see in a natural, geologic formation.
creationwiki.org/Durup%C4%B1nar_site
wyattmuseum.com/laminated-wood-on-noahs-ark/2011-685
discoveryupdate.com/discovery1.htm
ua-cam.com/video/oQwfU7DvUyE/v-deo.html
They did all that and took samples
Last year they drill out cores to same to find out what was causing the anomaly to show up on the scanner that wont appear naturally
@@Open-Minded_Christian perfect, thanks for the info! I’ll check it out.
I still can't believe our government thought the best way to discover something was to blow it up 🤦🤣
Devil hate god
Watching this video it dawned on me that with the big camera movements of the aerial drone you get gobs of parallax. This gave me the impression that these would make great immersive 3D videos. These shots give a better sense of the terrain and rolling topography of the landscape that is lost in the old grainy flat 2D photos that we were accustomed to seeing.
It would be nice if someone gets good 3D and VR aerial footage to post here. I’m no expert but I think there are apps/software to convert standard video to 3D formats that you can view on your phone with those special Oculus type goggles.
Thank you Andrew and thank you Ron for the great narration.
I seen the same 2level video yu seen. However i seen a video of someone inside and yu cud see a very dark wood. And this was a older video from late 70s or early 80s. I was just a kid being born in 1974 and my mom was a devout catholic. So even at that young age i knew the great significance of this ARC.
My Mom was obsessed with stories of Jesus's Relics. The Arc, The Shroud, The Holy Grail, Geesh and more stuff cant remember at the moment.
That’s not the ark. It’s already been studied and it’s natural rock. I personally believe the remnants of the ark are encased in ice on mount Ararat.
They have been inside. It's a ship. The evidence is irrefutable now.
@@clarkridlen1966 same dimensions as told in the Bible also
Love how rock formations create a dimensioned shape as the Ark. always excuses
@@Jerrymc1975 except it doesn’t.
Yup
Are you connected with Ron's museum in Alabama?
I know the Rives family that runs the Wyatt Museum which actually is in Tennessee. I have been to the Museum too.
To imagine, the water receding, the boat crashing out, the clouds folding back as God's will was set forth, what a biblically beautiful site to see with one's own eyes. Truly amazing.
I mean, you can see where it washed the boat in from the massive flood, the boat crashed there, and the waters all receded, the erosion, the evidence is there.
The ARK did not "crash". It "rested on the mountains of Ararat". (Gen. 8:4).
god can't even deal with chariots fitted with iron...let alone a destroyer of world flood....
Imagine believing such fairy tales xD
@@shanesimms3665 you only find good script like this there tho:
leviticus 26 :27But if in spite of all this you do not obey Me, but continue to walk in hostility toward Me,
28I will act with furious rage against you, and I Myself will punish you sevenfold for your sins.
29You will eat the flesh of your sons and the flesh of your daughters.
30I will destroy your high places, cut down your incense altars, and heap your dead bodies on the remains of your idols;
and My soul will despise you.
31I will reduce your cities to rubble and lay waste to your sanctuaries,
and I will refuse to smell the pleasing aroma of your sacrifices.
The is a good video. Did you happened to attempt to measure end to end and side to side. Where is it located on a map? Maybe use some kind of radar detection to confirm the find? I would need more information to know if this is really true.
Do a search with > Noah's Ark National Park, Turkey. Very easy to find...
how close do the length width measurements match up to the biblical description
there the exact same sorry I'm late i did a little research its called Durupınar site if you want to look into it yourself god told noah to make a boat 300 cubits which is how big that boat is per multiple sites
GOD IS GREAT ❤
At what?
What is the length of this ?
300 Royal Egyptian cubits. 515 feet.
@@DiscoveredMediaand that would be big enough for millions of animals?
@@Backpfeifengesicht45lo que te cuenta la biblia es que los animales que estaban en esa región se refugiaron en el arca. El milagro es que fueron en parejas.
Los animales tienen un sentido y saben dónde puede ser un lugar seguro en situaciones de catástrofes naturales (tsunamis) no es que en el arca entró todos los animales del planeta tierra.
So magnificent
Why would a wooden boat still exist? How would it fossilize? I just don't think its possible, and what are the chances it is noahs ark as opposed to any other boat in all of history
I've heard of that theory too. Maybe. 🙏👍
@@DiscoveredMedia I actually saw a old church film describing similar area and on side of the hill in Turkey it was an old Reel to Reel film.
When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does!
The test results:
The result was that it contained .71% total carbon. Inorganic carbon totalled 0.0081%. It contained .7019% ORGANIC CARBON - almost 100 times more organic than inorganic."
3.53
those are not rib timbers they are erosion marks and can be found throughout the area out side of the alleged ark
People these days are ready to believe in anything blindly
Agreed! If this was ANY kind of vessel people would’ve already completed the forensic work to confirm it and not just talk about what it looks like. They also definitely wouldn’t have been sending expeditions to the mountain to continue to look for it. Smoke and mirrors is all it is.
@@adarsh6857 these days? Lmao when was the bible written again?
@@platinumpepe8626 old testament at around Babylonian exile and new testament around 1st century AD. Does that satisfy you?
Are you claiming the wood turned into rock and dirt, wheres the close up footage of the material that makes up this formation, without that all we have is a shape of a ship nothing more
When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does!
The test results:
The result was that it contained .71% total carbon. Inorganic carbon totalled 0.0081%. It contained .7019% ORGANIC CARBON - almost 100 times more organic than inorganic."
The dimensions of this abject are the same as written in the Bible regarding Noah’s Ark ❤
I have seen aerial photos of some object sticking out of the ice that much more resembled the Biblical description of the Ark than this formation.
I would be interested in the scale of the formation. That would provide important information.
There was measurements done of this ark and they are exactly the measurements written in the bible and on the same mountain said in the bible
It's in 2 pieces as the flood waters receded and time went by the weight of the boat caused it to crack the biggest part rolling and falling and landing at this site. You would have to measure both pieces which they did..
@@angiebold2592 Seriously. Well it doesn’t look like half a boat. If it was half the rock pattern wouldn’t look like a boat. I know something that’s a novel idea why don’t they do an excavation. I’ve never heard of such an important discovery that it still hasn’t been excavated. Probably don’t want to destroy the “ tourist” attraction🤭
sorry im a bit late but in the bibel god told noah to build a boat 300 cubits long which is exactly how big this boat we are seeing here is its called Durupınar site btw
Glory be to GOD 🙏🔥🕊️♥️
This is exactly what made me start my journey to stop believing. You blindly accept something so willingly. This guy Ron Wyatt is no a train archeologist, and even trained ones who believe in god dismiss this as they know it is not through testing done since its discovery in 1949.
Ron Wyatt's god was greed, the almighty $$$. After all lying is a sin, Ron says he discovered this, yet he could not have given it was discovered in 1949, it was named the Durupinar in 1950's after Turkish Army Captain Ilhan Durupınar who took pictures of it.
The site was blasted and all they found was solid rock....if it was a boat of any sort it would have been hollow.
Seeing someone like you act as you did, made me question the Bible, I then spent 5 years studying the Bible with an open mind....not one that displayed brainwashing... By saying what you have here it has had an affect on others, I can never tell people to think for themselves, but your actions help.
Why ?
NOAH my favourite hero of bible
I’m confused. Can’t we just prove it by digging around everything to reveal it. Archeologists dig around complete ancient civilizations. Why hasn’t this been done yet. Come on, let’s see it and prove to the world Gods word is true!!
Some countries have laws set to where you cannot dig or if you are foreign you have to go through a laundry list of paperwork and people to even get permission to go and then dig.
This has been known about for decades yet still no excavation.. WHY!?
Because its a tourist trap
This discovery has actually proven to be false.
@@Unknown86483 nah its real
For historic land mark and for people to see history.
@@NoteFlakez It's false. I can tell you that because much of mainstream archaeology and biblical scholars and Christians have rejected his findings as credible. Whether you want to believe Ron Wyatt actually discovered the Ark or not, i don't judge you for that, but he is still a fringe archaeologist according to the research I've done.
The surrounding ridges also resemble a boat shape too. Maybe this is just a very "boat shaped" pattern of rock erosion. Could also be an ancient Viking ship because we can't definitively say that is Noah's Ark on Mount Ararat, sorry.
Maybe, but to be fair the area was only written to have been under water once and that was during the world wide flood. During the time of the Vikings, Ararat would have been far above sea level. What's more it was written for centuries that Noah's ark landed on Mout Ararat. Finding any boat on that specific mountain would be singularly unique to Noah's arc.
Just to be clear, Genesis 8:4 says that the ark rested "on the mountains of Ararat." Ararat was the name of the region in Biblical times. During the Middle Ages, the volcano now known as "Mount Ararat" came to be associated with the Noah story -- understandable, since it's the tallest and most magnificent in the region, but it wasn't previously associated with the story, from what I can tell. The site in this video is about 20 miles from the current Mount Ararat, which is why many creationists don't like it -- they're pretty attached to current Mount Ararat being the true site, though there's nothing to suggest that it was considered Mount Ararat at the time the flood story was written down, or when it was included at the beginning of Genesis. And then there's the fact that the Hebrew says "mountains" instead of "mountain."
So if there is way more that enough evidence to say this is a boat… why did you present none of it here?
It seems the dimensions described in Scripture would form a rectangular prism, not a streamlined round bottom boat hull.
What scripture gives is merely its length, breadth, and height, like you'd do for any boat. If I said that the USS Constitution was a certain length, breadth, and height, you wouldn't say, "Ah, so it was rectangular!"
The idea of it being a rectangular prism got popularized among a few creationists who are very adamant about it (perhaps because it's really important to them that as many animals as possible could've been housed in it), and I don't mind if they posit it as a guess or theory, but when they claim that scripture says it, I have to object.
I checked 6 translations, and they all concur on the dimensions. Here's one that's particularly close to the Hebrew: Gen 6: 14 Make for thee an ark◦ of gopher wood; with◦ rooms thou shalt make the ark◦, and shalt tar it inside and outside with tar◦.
15 And this is how thou shalt make it: three hundred cubits the length of the ark◦, fifty cubits its breadth, and thirty cubits its height◦.
16 A window thou shalt make to the ark◦, and to▵ a cubit thou shalt complete it from above; and the entrance of the ark◦ thou shalt set in its side; with lowest◦, second, and third stories thou shalt make it.
If someone told you before you ever read the Genesis account yourself, "It's a rectangular ship," I can see how you might read it pre-disposed to picture these dimensions as forming a rectangular prism, like you might do in math class in elementary school. But if you read it without already being told to picture it as rectangular, you'd do what almost everybody in the last several thousand years has done, prior to the last two or three decades when this pet theory came to be, and assume it's shaped like a normal boat -- e.g., eye- or almond-shaped.
Now, it's possible that the writer of the beginning of Genesis wanted you to picture a rectangular-ish boat - who am I to say not? I don't know! - but it's a weird reading of the dimensions, like if someone told you the dimensions of a basketball and you drew it as a box instead of as a globe.
@@ayishas4385 I agree with your idea that there is much detail left out in scripture and some of that detail cannot be explained in mere words, but must be either drawn out as well, or seen and memorized. Take the construction of the tabernacle, the menorah, The ark of the covenant, The altar of incense, the table for showbread, the courtyard altar, the curtains, the cherubim on the covering of the ark, etc., none of these could have been made correctly from just reading the Scriptural account. Moses saw them on the mountain in the Heavenly realm.
Chapter and vs?
Two Singaporean ladies would like to come by. Can anyone to link us up? Isa 19 highway
Sure. Contact me via email at info@noahsarkscans.com or WhatsApp +19166227736
God's word is true and no matter what it'll always prevail, endure and will be proven true, hallelujah!!!
Except when it's false no matter what as it does not prevail, endure or is proven false, hornytoads!!!
Looks like rocks to me? Is there any wood left? Should be easy to determine.
It is. As I stated, the explanation for the rocks in the middle of the so called boat is ridiculous.
Ron wyatt watch his videos with proof
When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does!
The test results:
The result was that it contained .71% total carbon. Inorganic carbon totalled 0.0081%. It contained .7019% ORGANIC CARBON - almost 100 times more organic than inorganic."
The "anchor stone" at Kazan is a fine-grained (0.001-1.0 mm) porphyritic volcanic rock in which phenocrysts (0.2-1.0 mm) consist of about 6% ilmenitic magnetite (a titanium and iron oxide containing some manganese) and about 29% plagioclase (andesine-labradorite). The very fine-grained ground mass (about 65%) contains plagioclase and ilmenitic magnetite, but with large amounts of ilmenitic magnetite than occurs as phenocrysts. The composition of this anchor stone is unusual because it lacks magnesium-rich minerals such as pyroxenes and olivine. All rock samples from the structure are pyroxene-bearing andesite or basalt partly altered to serpentine. Local calcite veins (3-5 mm wide) cut across the rock. Ilmenitic magnetite is a common accessory.
The supposed "iron bracket" is composed of granules of limonite, some of which have sizes and shapes that match those of ilmenitic magnetite crystals in the andesite of the Ark, the anchor stone, and nearby peridotite. These granules are enclosed in a matrix of calcite, clay, quartz, and fragments of anthophyllite. Many limonite granules exhibit rhythmic concretionary layers. Rare veins of pyrolusite (MnO2) locally cut the limonite.
Ive read it several times and I cant tell at all what you are saying in the analysis.
I wonder where the holes near the tops formed. That report does not give any interpretation on that.
Are the sides made of petrified wood?
No, earth and stone.
Only one problem, in the drone footage you can see several other structures that resemble the “ark” but are smaller. What are those suppose to be? And how about the very obvious rock structures that look almost identical to the supposed beams of the ark? It is human nature to see certain objects in rocks/rock formations. Native Americans would see many different animals in the sides of mountains or on the edge of cliffs. I have a rock that looks almost exactly like a frog, but I know it wasn’t a frog at one point. And it isn’t limited to rocks, people see famous people in potato chips and even Jesus in burnt toast. The phenomenon is called Pareidolia, and our brains are just wired to see familiar items in random stimuli. This is simply a rock formation that appears slightly like a boat, or a better way of saying it, this is a boat shaped rock formation. I believe in God, but I don’t believe this the ark
You are going to upset the one dimensional non thinking gullible individuals out there.
@@JamesSmith-gn9ou Your the only one that appears to be non thinking and gullible. This fella Mopar_Dude gave a concise but detailed analysis of the video and you response is "your going to be upset" That is the definition of a non thinking one dimensional response.
@@blusheep2 Obviously reading comprehension is not your strong suite. I was agreeing with Mopar that was not the Ark and his conclusion (the same as mine) would upset the one-dimensional non-thinkers who were viewing this video. What about that do you not understand?
@@JamesSmith-gn9ou It didn't read that way but if your saying you meant something else by it then fine.
@@blusheep2 Whatever.
Is he flying while he is talking? :)
Has anyone ever used ground penetrating radar on this site?
Naw, just dynamite and a whole lot of speculation. Oh, and drones. And more speculation.
Ron wyatt did watch his video
How long did it take Noah to build the ark
D.H., No real span of time is given for building the ark. However, the Bible states that Noah was 500 yrs. old when he had his 3 sons, and 600 yrs. old when he ,and his, entered into the ark. So some time within that 100yrs. period it appears.....
I'm waiting for the drone tour of The Easter Bunny's summer home in Boca Raton.
It got put on hold because Shrek was going to sue for breach of contract if they didn't film his villa in Portofino first.
@@kraquin Nice.
Are the dimensions as they should be according to the Book?
there the exact same sorry I'm late i did a little research its called Durupınar site if you want to look into it yourself god told Noah to make a boat 300 cubits which is how big that boat is per multiple sites
Yep that's a rock formation that looks like a boat
@@taylorthetunafish5737 those were the best boats.
Goes to buy a boat
Shipmaster: hold my rock
Nothing f!oats like a nice piece of
granite .
Ahh yes, I'm sure you came to that conclusion with your years of research sheep.
@@brettls2 you do know this event never happened, right? The Young Dryus, yes, but Noah's Ark, nope.
Has anyone looked inside??
It's so amazing to imagine 4 men building this huge thing themselves...everything by hand...even having to cut the trees and form the wooden beams, make every single piece needed by hand. Wow! No wonder it took so long. And Noah's faithfulness to God never faltered in all that time. We can learn a lot from Noah.
I don’t know of that many biblical scholars who believe it was built by four people alone. Besides the fact that they all had wives and probably children, there was also nothing barring them from hiring others to help them.
What I find hard to believe is how Noah would have had to go to all continents on the planet to get animals, birds, etc. How would he have been able to catch the animals and what would he have used to travel to all the continents? How would he ever have known where to even go to get the animals? None of it makes sense.
@@TimesUp777 It is one of the most fundamental parts of the story that the animals were made to come to the Ark, they did not have to be wrangled or found. They were acting on a divine mandate, which obviously overrides natural instinct entirely.
It's possible that they made this journey in the form of a migration, (most scholars believe the world had a single super continent at that time) or that they were transported via spatial warping or some other supra-physical means.
At the end of the day, that is among the least of our possible objections to the story.
@@reijishian2593 I have read that Noah's Ark happened 6000 years ago and if that is the case then I highly doubt there was 1 large super continent at that point in time. It's one of the stories in the bible that is kind of hard to believe.
@@reijishian2593 That grown adults believe this nonsense is beyond me. Most 7 year olds could see through it.
You mentioned metal brackets?? Did they have metal back then?
So... the boat was made of a natural rock formation AND stayed afloat. Impressive.
Plus wood exposed like that would’ve rotted away within 500 years.
@@bigrooster6893 Yet, wood can petrify in as little as seven years, becoming stone.
You ever heard of petrified wood? You know wood does eventually turn to stone even in the elements. Ever heard of the Petrified Forest in Arizone. There giant trunks of trees that are not stone just lying around the National Park. It can take anywhere from 7 to 36 years for wood to actually petrify and become stone. So the fact that this structure is stone is not surprising at all.
But he’s breathing so hard. I mean, what more proof do you need?
@@donadams5094 its on mt ararat, this may have been a settlement for them after the flood.
There is metal brackets?
God bless you faithful servant nicely done
How do you explain all the other geological features that are not part of what you say is a boat?
When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does!
The test results:
The result was that it contained .71% total carbon. Inorganic carbon totalled 0.0081%. It contained .7019% ORGANIC CARBON - almost 100 times more organic than inorganic."
It’s a drone tour of some geological formation. I’m not sure about a boat though or an ark. Wild animals piled in together like that tend to start eating each other.
The bible said that the boat seated on the tip of the mountain where they see all waters around them. What is the highest form of land or mountain (Everest?) Could they have been stranded on the tip of that mountain while waiting for the waters to dry?
That is an eye-opening scene. And has there been any confirmation that what we are seeing contains wood particles?
Um. It's fake. Not Noah's ark. It has be proven to be a rock formation.
No proof
100% Pareidolia, zero physical evidence to substantiate the claim. You can also see the giant canyon in the southwest US where Paul Bunyun dragged his axe across the landscape
@@carlgray523 yeah sure...
@next level tech if you think the world's population was inbred from Noah's sons families of the Bible then your an idiot!!!!! So is every other Christian that thinks the same thing.
This is the most beautiful thing of today.
I don't recall the ark shipwrecking on a rock. It came to rest and all the animals got out out safely.
@Manuel Gonzalez Were you????
He says the ark rested partly on the rocks and on the ground. They emptied it safely and it was sometimes later the hull timbers gave way and the rocks protruded through them.
I don't know how long it took for this to happen. At a time months or years later? We don't know. There was no shipwreck but settling later as Ron said.
@@lizh1988 Ron Wyatt is a charlatan that has claimed to have found every major missing piece from Noahs Ark to the Red Sea crossing to blood of Jesus(recently.) He has no credibility, even amongst Bible believing scholars and historians. I wouldn't wrap to much up in the "findings" of this guy. Hes a joke.
That doesn't mean Noah's ark story is untrue. This is a critique against the man. Not the Biblical accounts.
Nobody alive today was there people.. GENESIS 8:4; And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, "upon the mountains of Ararat". AMEN.
@@jamesm2256 Using the bible as proof that the bible is true is a circular argument and therefor moot.
where are the timbers? Under the ground?
When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does!
The test results:
The result was that it contained .71% total carbon. Inorganic carbon totalled 0.0081%. It contained .7019% ORGANIC CARBON - almost 100 times more organic than inorganic."
Very nice video tour and the narration about Noah's boat 🛶 🙏
I’m just not seeing it. Looks like the rest of the local geography.
Wood takes more than 13,000 years to petrify, and no examples of crossbeams or anything else is given other than saying they are there.
I want to believe it, but the evidence is not compelling enough.
I'm amazed at how well everyone has kept this amazing discovery a secret. They must really not want this story told.
Even the Christians don't want to know
@Jay Jesus loves you.🔥🕊️♥️
It’s not a secret, it’s just an absurdity. The most amazing thing is the credulity of so many people.
@@MyNameIsChristBringsASword ???? Why????
yea i guess sticking it in ever magazine and it being on every major news source in the world will effectively hide it from the people.
Is there any hollow spaces in there?
It’s already a tourist attraction. It’s been years it been discovered. Can you imagine if they excavated and there wasn’t anything there. Big egg on there faces and no tourists. They are talking about it. Alway an excuse
I could imagine. Be awesome if it were true though
He gave the location and why it’s not being dugged up 🤦🏾♂️
Ron wyatt already did 90's watch his video
@@devideos2024 ok I’ll check it out
Where is this location? Why haven't they had a team out there to preserve it?
I would absolutely love to visit this place for myself. 🌈
Yeah , me to John !
Sorry, I don't see a "boat". I see nothing but rock formations and soil everywhere. If this is the Ark, why hasn't there been massive excavations to confirm it?
We have the same story in Hinduism. Noah is Manu here. The word Prophet is known as Prajapathi . Perhaps our ancestors migrated with Noah’s story from Armenia , turkey through Iran. Maybe this event is more older.
If the Bible is true, which I completely believe it is, then the story would have come down to you through generations starting with one of your ancestors on the boat. Noah would be all of our +great grandfather.
Used to feel bad when I was in school In south India when classmates used to tell you are not belonging to abrahamic religion. Now that we’re all related through Noah/ Manu , 👍 we’re cousins .
I did live in turkey during teenage later. Always felt a strong connection with the place.
Your story about Manu, same as Gilgamesh is older then Noah
I’m a bit skeptical about this. Could it be the ark? Sure I suppose so but from the video it looks like a roughly boat shaped mound formation. I’m not entirely convinced that it was actually a wooden boat and not just a natural anomaly or a built mound site like serpent mound or something that resembles a boat perhaps even to commemorate the flood and ark occasion. When he says they pulled Timbers and metal brackets out of the supposed sides of the boat he doesn’t show this evidence which is something I’d very much like to see if it is in fact true. And also what is his explanation for the giant rock in the middle again I’m not buying that the whole thing just landed there and the sides are pretty much perfectly intact shape wise and then the entire bottom is just gone somehow seems to me it’d be buried but the rock suggests otherwise at least to me but who knows
I'm a LOT skeptical of this! Why not take samples that can be analyzed in a lab to prove what they actually are? Anybody can point at a rock formation!
@@timnewman1172 Quote...
11) Has any petrified wood been tested?
"Firstly, it is worthy to note the Aramaic root word for the Hebrew word translated “gopher wood” means laminated wood (this is when layers of wooden boards are glued together one upon another to provide extra strength).
The deck Timber Analysis.
When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does!
The test results:
The result was that it contained .71% total carbon. Inorganic carbon totalled 0.0081%. It contained .7019% ORGANIC CARBON - almost 100 times more organic than inorganic."
Did he ran before commenting?
Yea he was hiking up the dirt road back then to the visitor center site (before that was there I think) and so yea he was out of breath.
Is this the same location where people descended inside and explored wooden chambers?
THANKS!
Did you take any measurements of this object ??? So as to compare them with the bible. ???
there the exact same sorry I'm late i did a little research its called Durupınar site if you want to look into it yourself god told noah to make a boat 300 cubits which is how big that boat is per multiple sites
The narrator is actually walking up a stair
There is no doubt in my mind that this is, in fact, the real Noah's Ark. The overall shape of it and the fact that the colors and deposits are so strikeing against the natural layout of the surrounding landscape that this is enough alone to support my belief.
You must not have any knowledge or education in geology, because this is a natural geologic feature.
You really accept on very little evidence don’t you. If this wasn’t in the bible would you believe it. 🤷♂️I doubt it
How exciting , wish Ron was still here! Enjoyed the video thanks
Me too! He's sorely missed.
What’s up with the heavy breathing?
The audio was taken from an older video and in that video Ron hiked to the area he started narrating so he was out of breath when he started talking.
Thanks for the video, which I enjoyed. I'd only ever seen still photos of this site before.
However, watching the video has reinforced my original suspicions that this is not the remains of a boat at all - just a naturally occurring rock formation.
Sooooo, the dynamite thing seems a little crazy..
But given the historical weight of such a phenomenal find it's just baffling why a mini excavator hasn't been hauled up there and start gently digging around until zero doubt remains as to whether it's a boat or not🤷🤷🤷
Paleontologist spend their life scratching around for a few bones, how is it possible this doesn't peak more interest?🤔
@D-Bunker
One way to find out!
it has occurred to me that the ark was dismantled and the material used to build homes for the four families on board. It would have taken years for new forest to grow...maybe they used it for fire wood as well...just saying...
I agree. They would have been more advanced in years and had the wisdom to use the wood from the ark to build and use for energy. It would be a waste to let all that wood just sit there. If Noah and his family didn't use it, surely someone else would have. I'm a believer, but I don't believe there is any evidence of any of the ark that still exists. It would have only taken a couple of generations for the wood to be all used up. I believe Answers in Genesis or Institute for Creation Research has articles that talk about this on their websites. As Christians, we really want people to find pieces of the ark so that it provides evidence for our faith but if we never do, it doesn't make our faith less valid or true.
When Ron brought the petrified deck timber home, he, as well as all who saw it, knew that it LOOKED like a piece of wood turned to stone (petrified). However, looks CAN be deceiving, so on Sept.16, 1987, he took the section of petrified wood that had been dug up on June 20th , to Galbraith Labs in Knoxville TN. Ron videotaped everything they did, including taking the sample from the specimen, and actual execution of the analysis. The important thing to determine was if the specimen contained organic carbon. A rock doesn’t, but petrified wood does!
The test results:
The result was that it contained .71% total carbon. Inorganic carbon totalled 0.0081%. It contained .7019% ORGANIC CARBON - almost 100 times more organic than inorganic."
Why hasn't this site been excavated? Where are the metal brackets and petrified gopher wood? I would love to see this.
I think the Muslims control the area and they don't allow it.
@@blusheep2 that’s odd that they wouldn’t allow it. I mean, even Muslims believe in Noah’s ark. The Quran calls him “Nuh” instead of Noah, but Sura 11 talks about the same ark and great flood. I would think they’d be interested in this site too, but who knows…
@@ErikStone1 Actually, this was originally the site Muslims claimed was the resting place of the ark. They were saying this while Christians were claiming it had been found on Mt. Arat by someone else.
Muslims have a history of restricting studies that may prove them wrong in the long run. That being said, I don't know if they have definitely done so here. There may have been numerous studies allowed here but when the scientists arrived they realized right away that there isn't anything to find.