"This Movie is not for men!" Men all over the world, "...Okay then..." Movie flops... "Its men faults for the movie doing bad!!! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"... Men who did absolutly nothing "dafuk did we do this time?..."
Actually the reason for this movie for flopping is because black people didn't go and see the movie. Got nothing to to do with white men this time - the audience was only 8% black, even the Asian score was higher. So, lets all attack black women for not going to the movie - oh, we're not allowed to do that. But then again we must believe all women, and they made a decision not to go so we can blame them, but then again, they have a vagina - oh, I give up.
That’s exactly it. It’s that men want to see a woman who actually is interested in men. They know they don’t have a chance with Cameron Diaz but for 2 hours they want to think they have a chance. That’s what will get men to see a movie like this. That’s what made the original tv show and the movie popular. Men felt like they could meet one of those spy women and they might actually be the guy that those girls sleep with for the night. The entire spy genre is based on the real life situations that real spy’s found themselves in where before going on a mission they would have a passionate one night stand because they understood that they could die the next day if they were caught during their mission. That’s why being a Bond girl was seen as so seductive and interesting was that bond was having sex with them because he thought he was likely going to die the next day. That’s how men want to feel about Charlie’s angels. That if they were lucky that one of these girls would bring them home for the night before they go on their big mission. These people don’t get that concept and they don’t go for that idea so as a result their movies flop.
@@stevederp9801 really? Are we, men, really that desperate? When I watched that Cameron Diaz - led movie a few years ago, I watched it because Cameron was so funny in "There's Something About Mary, Lucy Liu was an alluring asian tigress in "Ally McBeal", which was one of my fave romcom shows on tv, and Drew Barrymore is one of my all-time fave actresses. Drew's collab with Adam Sandler in 50 first dates and the wedding singer was awesome! Never did I watch their shows to fantasize about them being my girlfriends. Their version of Charlie's Angels was just a very good movie performed effectively by these 3 actresses.
As a female I can assure you when i first saw the trailer with 3 women who were masculine dressed in attempt to make them look "strong" make me think wow this looks dumb and click off the trailer and set my mind not to see this because unlike the 2000s version with cameron diaz that had 3 sexy strong women kicking butt and having emotions even getting caught cause they are not invincible, this is 3 un sexy mary sues in a woke garbage of a film no female wants to watch.
Maybe its the fact that the women who are in positions to affect casting and creative want to make movies about their woke selves instead of what actually sells. Sarah Conner and Ripley from Terminator and Aliens respectively, were both badass women. Maybe the creative's don't know how to write character development for female leads, so they go for style over substance which is ironic considering the flak earlier movie's get for casting 'eye candy', meant to appeal to male audiences by selling sex appeal alone.
That's because women are mind-controlled by men, but somehow strong, and independent at the same time. Duh, haven't you bought into this narrative yet?! :P
@Andoc The brown and black people that have been (mis)used by the propaganda machine as tools for them to appear progressive, will be right there with ya👌🏿👍🏿
How was Dark Phoenix "woke"? Don't get me wrong it was a bad movie that bombed hard, but the comic story it is based on is one of the all time great X-Men classics. It bombed because the last X-men movie; Apocalypse was terrible, this version of the Dark Phoenix saga failed to do justice to the source material and people are just ready for X-Men to belong to the MCU.
Kendall Andrews They had a scene where Storm told Xavier that the women did most of the saving of the world and they should probably call the group X-Women.
I work as an usher at a movie theater, and I worked openeing night for Charlie's Angels. It played on the big screen which has a capacity of 293 to a crowd of about 25 pre-teen middle school girls. I held the door open as usual and say every patron as they walked out. Not a single adult in was there. Thats who this shitty movie is made for. I agree Jeff I aint got no more simpy Woketard Hollywood.
The thing, that's not who they * expected* their audience to be. As somebody pointed out above, the SJWs always cry for this kind of movie to be made, and then don't watch it themselves.
@@EricFarmall Unfortunately this is true, theater pays 8$ for a 40 pound popcorn kernal bag and we sell a large bag which is about 1/16 of that bag and we charge $8
Dear Lord. That would be the ultimate shit test. If she said yes, my response would be, "you'll hear from my attorney in the morning with the divorce papers"
@@odinstorm17 probably part of financing the movie. She gets paid regardless if it makes a profit or not. Explains why shes doubling down on her movie; she made out like a thief in the night.
@Don Corleone Nah, they'd have done just as well on their own but they enriched the overall setting with their stories. Those numbers WILL be repeated, they successfully pulled off removing their OG and making way for the new characters. Mainly because they weren't dumb enough to make everything be only about their OG the way Terminator and SW did.
Dedicated Bedbuck She’s not Jane Bond. The producers made it clear that James Bond will still be Daniel Craig. The new actress is just another spy. Also she’s played by an actress that can do action movies and she’s British, so it’s well in line with the potential of the movies. Now go back to your hole, troll.
There are movies that are reboots, remakes and sequels that serves as cash grabs. Whether they succeed or not, whether we want them or not. But none are as worse as movies that pretend they have noble causes.
It's not flopping. Presales are already matched to the presales of Endgame. Will it beat Endgame? Probably not, it depends on how good or passable it is.
@@Vossenator No, the pre-sales of one Disny-owned on-line ticket seller claimed they matched Endgame; of course that same on-line seller told pretty much the same thing about Solo, that it was breaking pre-sale records; didn't quite work out that well.
@@MrMrbrianbechtel It will make more money than this, flopping as hard though is the ratio between budget and take; and Rise of Soywalker's budget is a hell of a lot higher than CA's.
@@3dmaster205 And the pre-sales happened both inhumanly fast and took a suspiciously consistent pattern of seats people wouldn't want if they could choose.
Why can’t Hollywood realize that nobody likes it when they revive a franchise people don’t think needs to comeback and inject identity politics in for no reason whatsoever.
The reason was to “teach” men to not enjoy the things they naturally want to, and (once that fails) to give film makers a platform to preach their agenda further when the film flops. Basically, woketard movies exist so there can be media discussions and articles about them. It’s social engineering.
I think half hollywood was blackmail after some "sexual" escandals,and pedo stuff,and this wave of woke movies where the result,doubt after a pair of examples with Ghostbusters 2016 and Ocean 8 than any studio do willyng woke movies...
*Remember what Elizabeth Banks said before the release?* ”If this movie doesn’t make money it reinforces a stereotype in Hollywood that men don’t go see women do action movies. They’ll go and see a comic book movie with Wonder Woman and Captain Marvel because that’s a male genre. So even though those are movies about women, they put them in the context of feeding the larger comic book world, so it’s all about, yes, you’re watching a Wonder Woman movie but we’re setting up three other characters or we’re setting up Justice League.”
"You had 37 Spider-Man movies!" - E. Banks Except people actually want to see Spider-Man. Nobody asked for a Charlie's Angels reboot, especially one full of your feminist ideals.
Weird, because The first Charlie Angels movies, have been box office hits... I guess, men appreciate the concept of three ass kicking women, action genre, back in the days.
I still argue that a Black Widow movie told in the tone of a classic Bond movie will work. The problem is L3-37 is writing the newest movie and she has WAY less charisma and style than Elizabeth Banks.
Star Wars won't flop. Disney is spending hundreds of millions bucks on promotion, especially in the international market and that's the major market to profit these days. Plus, it will be Christmas. Plus, it's the 3rd part of the trilogy. All this together, and there's no way it's gonna flop. Maybe it won't profit like "Joker" but still it will earn hundreds of millions $
@@thenewkhan4781 It'll flop. The film already has a budget well north of 300 million or more. Probably close to 400 million because of extensive reshoots on top of the already high budget. They will spend 150 million or so for marketing. Add both, and you have a total close or well past half a billion. It would have to make what TLJ made just to break even. It would have to make TFA's numbers to make a profit. And it won't. The fans have no real interest in it and have only negative reactions from all the rumors/leaks thus far. The general audience is the same. Not much enthusiasm for it. Industry tracking for the film doesn't show it doing as well as the others. Internally the estimates are much lower. Iger himself even knows that the film won't do well.
OMG, can you imagine? A less than 10 million opening weekend for Star Wars? That would be insane! It won't do so well in America but the idiots in China will eat it.
@@TheMonster50 China hates star wars, dude. You loco? It underperformed hard there, in one week it was out of the threaters. And sadly, SW wont flop this hard, there are retards around enough to kae it sell 9 digits.
I loved hearing your genuine happiness and laughter in this video. Usually you're so serious (which isn't bad) but the constant struggle to not bust out laughing was very relatable.
@@albertthepeacock8020 At 8:10 he asks what if Rise of Skywalker flops - specifically how embarrassing it would be if it only grosses $800 million world wide.
@@smittywerbenjagermanjensen9809 well it probably won't reach Joker numbers but RoS is gonna be a success regardless I mean it's Star Wars they never had a box office flop (except for the Clone Wars movie in 2008 but I don't think people count that one) plus it's coming out around Christmas so the numbers will be nothing to sneeze at
@@milsteadonmovies Which is genuinely the worst movie I've ever seen. How they got such a fantastic cast to be involved in that dumpster fire, I'll never know.
I saw this video in my recommended videos on my UA-cam home page and when I saw your channel name I knew I needed to check you out, that name is brilliant!
This is like if a Christian movie was created that catered only to Christians but flops horribly at the box office and non-believers are blamed for it's failure.
2014: The year of the women 2015: The year of subversion 2016: The year of politics 2017: The year of killing the past 2018: The Woke Pushback Pt. 1 2019: The year of franchise death
Of course this is a flop . . It looks like Shit !! None of the Actresses look interesting and we could care less what the story is. If the studio really wanted to make another Charlie's Angels movie, what's wrong with just getting the older girls back?
Just yesterday I drove by my theater, and saw "Charlie's Angles" on the sign, and said out loud "What? I didn't know they were remaking that too". I guess no one else did either.
No one asked for it. But since the franchise was synonymous with sexy women and male enjoyment of same they had to try and “fix” it to prove such things have no place in the world anymore. Naturally they were wrong and the film bombed.
I just found out myself, after hearing that one of my favorite movie series "terminator" terminated itself with this woke acceptance bullshit. 🐃💩🤷♂️🤦♀️🤷♀️🤦♂️
I didnt even know there was a Charlie's Angles movie on 2019 till i saw this video. No wonder nobody watched it. It didnt even bother asking youtube to recommend it.
You make a movie for people that dont watch movies (anything actually) and then you Blame people that would never watch your movie for not watching your movie cuz it bombed. Amazing.
Shit I didn't realize this reboot even had a trailer (let alone was even released) until days after the movie bombed in theaters, now that's a marketing team that you fire, Sony
If you add all three girls in this movie they just barely make a solid 10. At least Lucy and Drew were remotely hot in the original with Cameron Diaz blowing her load in the original Mask.
Cameron Dias was a star. Lucy Liu came right from the set of Ally McBeal. Drew Barrymore have been a movie star since being that girl in ET at age 6. And Charlies Angels 2000 itself rode on the coattails of The Matrix.
A group of girls I work with were going to the movies last week and when I asked them what they were going to see they said "😆 *FORD VS FERRARI BAAABY!!!* 😆" 🧔💪🚘🤷♂️
I mean I wouldnt mind the movie if it was just a bunch of women in skimpy bikinis kicking ass and looking good doing it. But no, they had to include man hating sjw nonsense. Cant we just relax and watch a fun movie, not be bombarded with lessons on social justice?
And that movie could be made. Place them on a luxury yacht that get taken over by pirates. They eventually manage to defeat the pirates all why wearing nothing more then bikinis that totally fails to support anything (lot's of jiggeling, unlike sport bras).
"This movie isn't for you!"
"Why isn't anyone seeing our movie?"
Same people.
EXACTLY
This movie is not for anybody
"But we thought you would go see it anyway because your girlfriend forced you and she's wearing the pants!!"
Wait, if a movie full of women isn’t for men.....who is it for? How many lesbians do they think are out there?
Rob's Gymnasium
“This movie isn’t for men”
Men : We don’t want to see this!
Charlie’s Angeles: It’s men’s faults!
"This Movie is not for men!"
Men all over the world, "...Okay then..."
Movie flops...
"Its men faults for the movie doing bad!!! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"...
Men who did absolutly nothing "dafuk did we do this time?..."
That defines womens logic 🤭🤭
@@HombreDufff Third-wave feminist logic :)
What? You're not used to it by now?
Lmfao my exact thought
REEEEEEE
Elizabeth Bank's ruined her own movie. Dont attack fans after reviews come out and before the movie even drops
Actually the reason for this movie for flopping is because black people didn't go and see the movie. Got nothing to to do with white men this time - the audience was only 8% black, even the Asian score was higher. So, lets all attack black women for not going to the movie - oh, we're not allowed to do that. But then again we must believe all women, and they made a decision not to go so we can blame them, but then again, they have a vagina - oh, I give up.
@Kaila PowerzTv That IQ though...
@БДЯЄTH What did Olivia Wilde say and what movie was she talking about?
@БДЯЄTH Christ. Another hot Hollywood actress who's batshit insane.
continuing to pave the way for the battle of the sexes
dividing men and women further and further
Men are attracted to women, that are attracted to men. Go Figure.
Whew! Quite the paradox in Woke culture.
it really be that simple.
That’s exactly it. It’s that men want to see a woman who actually is interested in men. They know they don’t have a chance with Cameron Diaz but for 2 hours they want to think they have a chance. That’s what will get men to see a movie like this. That’s what made the original tv show and the movie popular. Men felt like they could meet one of those spy women and they might actually be the guy that those girls sleep with for the night.
The entire spy genre is based on the real life situations that real spy’s found themselves in where before going on a mission they would have a passionate one night stand because they understood that they could die the next day if they were caught during their mission. That’s why being a Bond girl was seen as so seductive and interesting was that bond was having sex with them because he thought he was likely going to die the next day. That’s how men want to feel about Charlie’s angels. That if they were lucky that one of these girls would bring them home for the night before they go on their big mission. These people don’t get that concept and they don’t go for that idea so as a result their movies flop.
@@DocMicrowave Ironic, isn't it?
@@stevederp9801 really? Are we, men, really that desperate? When I watched that Cameron Diaz - led movie a few years ago, I watched it because Cameron was so funny in "There's Something About Mary, Lucy Liu was an alluring asian tigress in "Ally McBeal", which was one of my fave romcom shows on tv, and Drew Barrymore is one of my all-time fave actresses. Drew's collab with Adam Sandler in 50 first dates and the wedding singer was awesome! Never did I watch their shows to fantasize about them being my girlfriends. Their version of Charlie's Angels was just a very good movie performed effectively by these 3 actresses.
As a female I can assure you when i first saw the trailer with 3 women who were masculine dressed in attempt to make them look "strong" make me think wow this looks dumb and click off the trailer and set my mind not to see this because unlike the 2000s version with cameron diaz that had 3 sexy strong women kicking butt and having emotions even getting caught cause they are not invincible, this is 3 un sexy mary sues in a woke garbage of a film no female wants to watch.
A waste of the cast. KSTEW has been good in other films, like for example Into The Wild.
Maybe its the fact that the women who are in positions to affect casting and creative want to make movies about their woke selves instead of what actually sells. Sarah Conner and Ripley from Terminator and Aliens respectively, were both badass women.
Maybe the creative's don't know how to write character development for female leads, so they go for style over substance which is ironic considering the flak earlier movie's get for casting 'eye candy', meant to appeal to male audiences by selling sex appeal alone.
Well clearly you’re a nazi
I don't know what we're they thinking. As a female I like MAN butt
Naomi Scott is a babe. Sexiest one in all Charlie’s Angels versions.
Hollywood/mainstream media: "this movie failed bc of men!!!"
Women: "we didn't go see it either... "
That's because women are mind-controlled by men, but somehow strong, and independent at the same time. Duh, haven't you bought into this narrative yet?! :P
I went to see or because of Kristen, so I was happy about it. But everything else was meh.
Actually this whole "Women Card" is so irrelevant.
Men's also likes to watch Women Superhero movies
Just See
Black Widow
Captain Marvel
Wonder Women.
Literally nobody asked for this movie
How man hating was it?
Well, the babe that made it said that her movie "is full of sneaky Feminist ideas".
I didn't even know it existed, I still wouldn't have watched it.
Well the trailer in first second said "women can do everything she want" then beating a white man in nice suit.
Charlies Angels are supposed to be in the "jiggle" genre, something feminists hate.
i thought it would of been 3 men to replace the women.
"We're not hating you Hollywood; we're just hating you back" Well said.
Dark Phoenix, Dark Fate, and now Charlie's Angels, Wokeness is dying, brace for impact Blue haired SJW's!
@Andoc The brown and black people that have been (mis)used by the propaganda machine as tools for them to appear progressive, will be right there with ya👌🏿👍🏿
They are funded
@Andoc as an Indian (brown) i agree with you. fuck wokeness. I am a liberal as well but ashamed to admit it more often cuz of these people.
How was Dark Phoenix "woke"? Don't get me wrong it was a bad movie that bombed hard, but the comic story it is based on is one of the all time great X-Men classics. It bombed because the last X-men movie; Apocalypse was terrible, this version of the Dark Phoenix saga failed to do justice to the source material and people are just ready for X-Men to belong to the MCU.
Kendall Andrews They had a scene where Storm told Xavier that the women did most of the saving of the world and they should probably call the group X-Women.
"‘Charlie’s Angels’ Is Fifth Woketard Franchise to Die at Box Office"
- that has to be the greatest headline of the year
I freaking love “Woketard” I’m using it now.
Kevin Castillo I came across 'wokescold' recently. Lots of fun to be had with the word.
Ditto. That’s just the perfect word for their idiocy. They can’t seem to learn from repeated failure.
It's been around for a while now. Surprised so many people never heard the phrase until now.
These have been around. A favorite is Woke-Tardation
Woketard name fits better than SJW. Whenever I talk to friends I always prefered the name SJI (Social Justice Idiots) but Woketard is better.
"A joyless deathmarch of feminist talking points."
Literal perfect sentence
That’s a great line. I’m gonna use it at some point.
It'll be perfect...when it fits a....oh, that's right.
Stop hurting my feelings while I'm on my male menstrual cycle.
I work as an usher at a movie theater, and I worked openeing night for Charlie's Angels. It played on the big screen which has a capacity of 293 to a crowd of about 25 pre-teen middle school girls. I held the door open as usual and say every patron as they walked out. Not a single adult in was there. Thats who this shitty movie is made for. I agree Jeff I aint got no more simpy Woketard Hollywood.
How much popcorn was sold? I understand theaters make most of their money off concessions.
The thing, that's not who they * expected* their audience to be. As somebody pointed out above, the SJWs always cry for this kind of movie to be made, and then don't watch it themselves.
@@EricFarmall Unfortunately this is true, theater pays 8$ for a 40 pound popcorn kernal bag and we sell a large bag which is about 1/16 of that bag and we charge $8
@@odysseusrex5908 they watched it allright, through illegal streaming sites lol
I don't like popcorn.
Me: "Hey wifey want to go see the new Charlie's Angels movie?"
Wifey: "No let's save movie night for something good."
There you go.
My man took me to see Joker. I wasn´t so sure but I´m glad he did! It was actually good!
Dear Lord. That would be the ultimate shit test. If she said yes, my response would be, "you'll hear from my attorney in the morning with the divorce papers"
@@stormrising2623 What is she says yes because she thought that you were referring to the early 2000s movie?
Same thing happened to me haha. She wanted to see The Joker and Rambo
"This Movie ain't for mens""
*Mens not watching it*
"Its mens fault!"
INT - 2
Hence the term "Woketard."
Looks like everybody spent their money watching Joker
Nah, WB bought empty seats.
Elizabeth Banks said in an interview, that this movie was her business plan.
Well that was a pretty bad business plan.
LMAO 🤦 wow she's way dumber than I thought. 😂😂😂
Maybe this is her tax evasion plan
@@odinstorm17 probably part of financing the movie. She gets paid regardless if it makes a profit or not. Explains why shes doubling down on her movie; she made out like a thief in the night.
@Don Corleone Tell that to Black Panther and Captain Marvel.
@Don Corleone Nah, they'd have done just as well on their own but they enriched the overall setting with their stories.
Those numbers WILL be repeated, they successfully pulled off removing their OG and making way for the new characters. Mainly because they weren't dumb enough to make everything be only about their OG the way Terminator and SW did.
"We don't hate you Hollywood, we're just hating you back," that's honestly the best way to summarize the majority's feelings!
The movie's main song is "Don't Call Me Angel". The filmmakers didn't even respect themselves.
"Don't call me angel!"
"Why would I?"
2019: I have the biggest flops of all time...
2020: hold my shaken but not stirred dry martini...
whats going on with James bond?
@@kylemcclain3894 www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/11/11/nolte-woke-james-bond-marries-bossy-feminist-drives-electric-car/
The article goes into detail where the next James Bond movie is going
Every time there's a new article about something from the new Bond movie, it's more cringey than the last thing.
Get woke, go broke.
The song another one bites the dust comes to mind....
The people they are catering to don't exist in enough numbers to make it profitable
There aren't that much blue twitter checkmarks
they just look like they’re a lot of them because they retweet everything
@@bemotivated8443 The paid critics make it seem like sjw movies are highly rated, so these directors legit think their movie will sell
Twittards are just hanging around where there's free WiFi, they have no money to spend 😂
Feminists: This movie isn't for men!
Same feminists: Why aren't men watching this movie!
When are we going to start talking about toxic feminism? Aka corporate feminism?
hoosier3060 in history class, decades from now probably
And likely business and marketing classes.
whoa there buddy, sounds like you need a refresher course in respeccing whamens
@Andoc - can you link me / us those stats? Not denying it - sounds about right - just wanna see it for myself.
The Last Jedi, Dark Fate, Charlie's Angels, and here comes "Jane Bond!!" When will they learn??
Dedicated Bedbuck She’s not Jane Bond. The producers made it clear that James Bond will still be Daniel Craig. The new actress is just another spy. Also she’s played by an actress that can do action movies and she’s British, so it’s well in line with the potential of the movies. Now go back to your hole, troll.
I'm still hoping the new Bond will be good, doubt it, but at least they didn't outright do "Jane Bond" but....we'll see what happens.
Jane Bond?! Oh God, no
There are movies that are reboots, remakes and sequels that serves as cash grabs. Whether they succeed or not, whether we want them or not.
But none are as worse as movies that pretend they have noble causes.
Wether we wanted it or not,we steped into war with the cabal
Worst flop of the year? Star Wars the rise of sky walker: “Hold My beer”
It's not flopping. Presales are already matched to the presales of Endgame. Will it beat Endgame? Probably not, it depends on how good or passable it is.
@@Vossenator No, the pre-sales of one Disny-owned on-line ticket seller claimed they matched Endgame; of course that same on-line seller told pretty much the same thing about Solo, that it was breaking pre-sale records; didn't quite work out that well.
@@3dmaster205 I agree, I don't believe that presale info at all... It won't flop as bad as this...
@@MrMrbrianbechtel It will make more money than this, flopping as hard though is the ratio between budget and take; and Rise of Soywalker's budget is a hell of a lot higher than CA's.
@@3dmaster205 And the pre-sales happened both inhumanly fast and took a suspiciously consistent pattern of seats people wouldn't want if they could choose.
Why can’t Hollywood realize that nobody likes it when they revive a franchise people don’t think needs to comeback and inject identity politics in for no reason whatsoever.
The reason was to “teach” men to not enjoy the things they naturally want to, and (once that fails) to give film makers a platform to preach their agenda further when the film flops. Basically, woketard movies exist so there can be media discussions and articles about them. It’s social engineering.
I think half hollywood was blackmail after some "sexual" escandals,and pedo stuff,and this wave of woke movies where the result,doubt after a pair of examples with Ghostbusters 2016 and Ocean 8 than any studio do willyng woke movies...
Holyshit a reasonable comment that gets to the heart of the issue without bashing either side. Kudos sir.
@@namelessjedi2242 right.
I don’t know who came up with the word “woketard” but they deserve a medal.
Fvckin hollywood woketards!
Doesn’t seem that creative
JJ C first time I've heard this little gem, so I think it's you! Accolades!
Most likely John Nolte himself.
BTW, this was probably my favorite article of his I've read in years.
They do have uncommonly good sense.
*Remember what Elizabeth Banks said before the release?*
”If this movie doesn’t make money it reinforces a stereotype in Hollywood that men don’t go see women do action movies. They’ll go and see a comic book movie with Wonder Woman and Captain Marvel because that’s a male genre. So even though those are movies about women, they put them in the context of feeding the larger comic book world, so it’s all about, yes, you’re watching a Wonder Woman movie but we’re setting up three other characters or we’re setting up Justice League.”
Well a lot of women sure went to see those “Male genre” films with female leads
"You had 37 Spider-Man movies!" - E. Banks
Except people actually want to see Spider-Man. Nobody asked for a Charlie's Angels reboot, especially one full of your feminist ideals.
@@ApplesAngels Even Spiderman 3 and the Amazing spider man films made money.
Weird, because The first Charlie Angels movies, have been box office hits...
I guess, men appreciate the concept of three ass kicking women, action genre,
back in the days.
Everytime I see those kind of "disclaimers" I automatically know it will fail, and they are just doing preemptive damage control.
The thumbnail: that’s the most emotional expression I’ve ever seen Kristen Stewart make and it’s not even real.
Imagine that, bad mouth your customers and it flops. Shocked face!
Charlie’s Angels from the 2000s is far more superior than this dumpster fire 🗑 🔥
Star wars and James Bond is next
It still will not work but they don't get it.
I still argue that a Black Widow movie told in the tone of a classic Bond movie will work. The problem is L3-37 is writing the newest movie and she has WAY less charisma and style than Elizabeth Banks.
I've come to terms with not watching Star Wars but Bond still stings because it's fresh.
Star Wars won't flop. Disney is spending hundreds of millions bucks on promotion, especially in the international market and that's the major market to profit these days. Plus, it will be Christmas. Plus, it's the 3rd part of the trilogy. All this together, and there's no way it's gonna flop. Maybe it won't profit like "Joker" but still it will earn hundreds of millions $
@@thenewkhan4781
It'll flop. The film already has a budget well north of 300 million or more. Probably close to 400 million because of extensive reshoots on top of the already high budget. They will spend 150 million or so for marketing. Add both, and you have a total close or well past half a billion. It would have to make what TLJ made just to break even. It would have to make TFA's numbers to make a profit. And it won't.
The fans have no real interest in it and have only negative reactions from all the rumors/leaks thus far. The general audience is the same. Not much enthusiasm for it. Industry tracking for the film doesn't show it doing as well as the others. Internally the estimates are much lower. Iger himself even knows that the film won't do well.
Let's make this happen to Rise of Soywalker y'all.
HelloWeasel
Rise of Soywoker
OMG, can you imagine? A less than 10 million opening weekend for Star Wars? That would be insane! It won't do so well in America but the idiots in China will eat it.
@@TheMonster50 They rejected the last one... Because the only Chinese character was fat and ugly.
Well I WANT Star Wars to succeed. I do not like Last Jedi, but Force Awakens wasn't that bad. No originality but not as bad as people say imo.
@@TheMonster50 China hates star wars, dude. You loco? It underperformed hard there, in one week it was out of the threaters.
And sadly, SW wont flop this hard, there are retards around enough to kae it sell 9 digits.
“Woketard” has to be the best phrase I’ve heard in ages
"We don't hate you, Hollywood, we're just hating you back. You started it."
Yes. I love that line.
Back then:Charlie's Angels.
Right now:Charlie's Failures.
LMAO,get woke go broke.
After a long day at school, coming home to this is nothing but true perfection. Thank you for giving me a good laugh tonight
Kristen Stewart as a lead in a shit movie no one asked for, sounds like a recipe for success
I enjoy her inability to pour ketchup and use toothpaste
Frank the NOOB
🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈
She's the most recognizable person on that poster, and nobody wants her to be.
A movie about hating men no surprise.
I didn't even know there was a new Charlie's Angels movie out
Sketchasaur Rex Me neither.
Thas bcux they had pooor markething
Go out and Watch "Ford v Ferrari"
Such a good movie
Batman and The Punisher. Say no more.
I loved hearing your genuine happiness and laughter in this video. Usually you're so serious (which isn't bad) but the constant struggle to not bust out laughing was very relatable.
If Rise of Skywalker grossed less than Joker it would be freaking beautiful!
crossing fingers for it;)
How do you get Star Wars from a video about Charlie's Angels? I legit am curious
@@albertthepeacock8020 At 8:10 he asks what if Rise of Skywalker flops - specifically how embarrassing it would be if it only grosses $800 million world wide.
It would indeed.
@@smittywerbenjagermanjensen9809 well it probably won't reach Joker numbers but RoS is gonna be a success regardless I mean it's Star Wars they never had a box office flop (except for the Clone Wars movie in 2008 but I don't think people count that one) plus it's coming out around Christmas so the numbers will be nothing to sneeze at
We don’t have to “worry” about these franchises... just shut your wallet. They’re dead, Jim!
This movie was supposed to launch Elizabeth Banks career as a Director!!!
Who's Elizabeth Banks?
Her career ended when she stopped appearing in every Apatow project in existence.
@@ThePooppantsman some chick who was on scrubs
Didn't she direct a scene for Movie 43?
@@milsteadonmovies Which is genuinely the worst movie I've ever seen. How they got such a fantastic cast to be involved in that dumpster fire, I'll never know.
I saw this video in my recommended videos on my UA-cam home page and when I saw your channel name I knew I needed to check you out, that name is brilliant!
We won again 😂
It's not hard to beat the village idiot
Effortless victory
Flawless victory... 🤣
To the KITCHEN with you!!
The angels have fallen, then they blamed Adam's kind for it.
Hollywood does seem to be a slow learner doesn’t it.
Someone should slap some sense in Hollywood..... Yeet woke culture !
Somewhere in Hollwood: We need live action Power Puff Girls.
That's a bad idea. Think of the outcome.
@@rufousthefox9766 I think the best would be live action..ummm...something original. Hahahaha.
Make it woke too
@ryubaks getting a decent story is the issue in the current social climate. I do have some hope for 2020, lets see what happens.
@@yeahboyz9314 if they have not learnt their lessons as yet they just might.
they didnt get the lesson with ghostbusters??
Apperantly not... Goldfishes have a better long term memory then thease woketards.
Shitty writers are entrenched in Hollywood and being woke is how they stay employed.
Hollywood learns nothing from its failures.
Terminator: I will be the worst film of 2019
Charlie’s Angels: Imma end this mans whole career
Good Luck aging gracefully Elizabeth Banks cause your career as a director is over.
In the immortal words of Emperor Palpatine, "Gooooooooooooood!"
Im looking forward to the 007 explosion...and the following fire
LordDante that’s if they even do it after this and many other debacles... lolololol
Best thing about liking King Kong and Godzilla, etc. BS like this hasn't bothered us yet lol.
Check out Elizabeth Banks twitter page. Makes it even funnier
Wait!?...there was a new Charlies Angles??? 🤔
Did not even see a single ad or trailer of it advertised.
#WOKETARD come on people let's spread this hashtag 🤗
Beautiful article! Couldn’t have said it better myself.👍🏻
Kirsten looks like she's trying be Queen La-Queef-Ka from GB 2016...
This is like if a Christian movie was created that catered only to Christians but flops horribly at the box office and non-believers are blamed for it's failure.
SavageX378 Wokeness is a religion all on its own.
@@dirkdiggler8093 A Cult without doubt.
apparently, none of this logic matters once a vagina is involved
2014: The year of the women
2015: The year of subversion
2016: The year of politics
2017: The year of killing the past
2018: The Woke Pushback Pt. 1
2019: The year of franchise death
Very good
So what's 2020 then?
Watching all the reasons this movie failed is far more entertaining than the movie could ever be!
Of course this is a flop . . It looks like Shit !! None of the Actresses look interesting and we could care less what the story is.
If the studio really wanted to make another Charlie's Angels movie, what's wrong with just getting the older girls back?
Or actually sexy women, which was the original pretext. You know, women who exude femininity.
Just yesterday I drove by my theater, and saw "Charlie's Angles" on the sign, and said out loud "What? I didn't know they were remaking that too". I guess no one else did either.
I may be out of the loop but i never saw a single trailer or news about this movie. Who asked for this???
Come to think about it, the last time I saw a trailer for a movie it was Mortal engines and It chapter 2.
No one asked for it. But since the franchise was synonymous with sexy women and male enjoyment of same they had to try and “fix” it to prove such things have no place in the world anymore. Naturally they were wrong and the film bombed.
@@namelessjedi2242 No one asked for it, No one wants it and they didnt even bother to promote it and they cant see the problem? Lol!
I didn’t even know there was a new Charlie’s angels movie out
Get woke go broke lol 😂
There was a Charlie’s Angels movie this year?
I just found out myself, after hearing that one of my favorite movie series "terminator" terminated itself with this woke acceptance bullshit. 🐃💩🤷♂️🤦♀️🤷♀️🤦♂️
I can't wait for the Razzies.
I didnt even know there was a Charlie's Angles movie on 2019 till i saw this video. No wonder nobody watched it. It didnt even bother asking youtube to recommend it.
That reviewer is everyone's spirit animal when it comes to these shenanigans
I didn't know we had 37 Spider-Man movies?
Damn!
You make a movie for people that dont watch movies (anything actually) and then you Blame people that would never watch your movie for not watching your movie cuz it bombed.
Amazing.
the original charlies angles from the 70's, that the only one you need to watch
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
"a star wars movie tanked"
these words together dont even look right!😣😣😣
The laugh at 0:28 though..... that's the laugh of complete satisfaction.
I love seeing SJW reboots fail. It gives me a warm fuzzy feeling like a sip of hot buttered rum :)
terminator dark fate: i'm this year's biggest flop
charlie's angels: hold my beer
Star Wars: wait for me, guys
Shit I didn't realize this reboot even had a trailer (let alone was even released) until days after the movie bombed in theaters, now that's a marketing team that you fire, Sony
I heard they cut the advert budget to it to minimize the loss as they saw that this will bomb.
This video was the first thing I heard of the movie. Did they even try marketing it?
Why should they market it? They saw the handwriting on the wall. Marketing it would only add to the loss.
Beautiful article. Fun. Enjoyment. Better entertainment compared to most movies in Hollywood
If you add all three girls in this movie they just barely make a solid 10. At least Lucy and Drew were remotely hot in the original with Cameron Diaz blowing her load in the original Mask.
Cameron Dias was a star. Lucy Liu came right from the set of Ally McBeal. Drew Barrymore have been a movie star since being that girl in ET at age 6. And Charlies Angels 2000 itself rode on the coattails of The Matrix.
To be honest, I didn't know anything about this movie till a couple of days ago
James Leach same
There was a Charlie’s Angels movie?
I haven't seen any commercials for it.
Yeah it had Lucy Liu,Drew Barrymore, and Cameron Diaz.
@@howdoyoudo5949 I wasn't a fan of that one either but Lucy Liu's ass was enough of a reason to sit through it.
Good luck with that black Jane Bond👍🤣
Truer words have not been spoken
(As Imperial March) Haw, Haw, Haw, Ha-Ha-Haw, Ha-Ha-Haw!
HAW, HAW, HAW, HA-HA-HAW, HA-HA-HAW! *HA! HAW, HA-HAAAA-HA, HA* HA-HA-HAW!
So women didn't watch a movie that made for them and it's men's fault...
what!
Yes. That's 101% correct.
(go along with it, there's no point in reasoning with feminists...)
@@anonymus1888 yeah
-Opening weekend haul by “Charlie’s Angels of Death?”
-I’ll bid $1, Bob!
-!!!!
A group of girls I work with were going to the movies last week and when I asked them what they were going to see they said "😆 *FORD VS FERRARI BAAABY!!!* 😆" 🧔💪🚘🤷♂️
Wasn't there a reboot TV show that got cancelled after one season a few years ago?
Wow, it’s ALMOST like people don’t want to see a movie based on a tv series that was around when their grandparents were young!
I mean I wouldnt mind the movie if it was just a bunch of women in skimpy bikinis kicking ass and looking good doing it. But no, they had to include man hating sjw nonsense. Cant we just relax and watch a fun movie, not be bombarded with lessons on social justice?
And that movie could be made. Place them on a luxury yacht that get taken over by pirates. They eventually manage to defeat the pirates all why wearing nothing more then bikinis that totally fails to support anything (lot's of jiggeling, unlike sport bras).
@@michaelpettersson4919 make it happen, I'd watch it
WAIT--
Al Sharpton paid a million dollars to his own charity??
I thought it was that "he got paid by his own charity to the tune of 1 million dollars"
@@DanielRigs You're right. His charity paid HIM a million. Al Sharpton would never give away a million dollars to anybody.
Wait a minute, Charlie's Angels isn't going to make the same amount of money as Joker!?
Its not gonna make the same amount as Dark Fate
But will it beat Tolkien?
I love the way it sounds like he's writing it down when he says "there's a phrase we haven't said on this channel yet"
I knew this movie was gonna flop. Even my mom said the trailer looked dumb.
Nice Scott Steiner reference lol "you don't get...MY SYMPY!"
Elizabeth Banks?
More like Elizabeth Tanks.