Can KNOWING Integral philosophy ACCELERATE your development? | Ken Wilber

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 сер 2024
  • Free Email Course on Building an Integrative Mindset: bit.ly/byim-in...
    Human development is uneven, which means that we are better at some things than we are at others. Some skills come more naturally to us, and others are more difficult to acquire. Watch as Ken and Corey explore each of these developmental capacities in detail, offering a powerful summary of human potentials, talents, and intelligences - a comprehensive map of the territory of “you” that will help guide your own ongoing growth and development.
    Watch the Full Episode: integrallife.c...
    #integrallife #kenwilber #development #personalgrowth
    Integral Life is a member-driven digital media community that supports the growth, education and application of Integral Philosophy and integrative metatheory to complex issues in the 21st century. Integral Life offers perspectives, practices, analysis and community to help people grow into the full capacities of integral consciousness in order to thrive in a rapidly-evolving world.
    Our website: IntegralLife.com
    Follow our news: / integrallifeofficial
    Integral thoughts on Twitter: / robbsmith

КОМЕНТАРІ • 28

  • @sereneintegral
    @sereneintegral 2 роки тому +2

    Love to see Ken smile. Keep strong we still need you here.

  • @inspiringconnection1092
    @inspiringconnection1092 4 роки тому +7

    I am so grateful to you, Ken Wilber, for teaching from vastness to specificity, and heart to heart. Glad to discover this channel.

  • @jondoe6926
    @jondoe6926 2 роки тому +2

    I've been saying, worst of blue and worst of green for 20 years. I am so happy to hear Ken elaborate. I could write a book. Ken seems to be saying the worst of green is inspiring the worst of blue. He's lacking the technological side of things, but a great distilled psychic version.

  • @influencija
    @influencija 4 роки тому +4

    Happy to see Ken bringing some sense into madness.

  • @Indigolden
    @Indigolden 4 роки тому +4

    As a person who has worked as a professor in academia for more than 20 years, I agree that the imbalance in political perspective is a problem in higher education. However, it is a gross exaggeration to suggest that college has become leftist indoctrination. There are a few "celebrity" professors at "prestigious" universities and a few programs, such as Women's Studies and African American Studies, that have that tendency. The majority of professors are doing their best to create an environment "safe" for both left and right perspectives. Many conference sessions that I have attended have focused on just this issue, certainly not on "indoctrination" of leftist views. Also, community colleges are much better at creating a fair environment than the famous four-years.

  • @arielelectron1575
    @arielelectron1575 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you, Mr. Wilber

  • @Jazzgriot
    @Jazzgriot 3 роки тому

    Great job Corey. Well done. Keep up the good work.

  • @alexanderlivian1342
    @alexanderlivian1342 3 роки тому

    this is unbelievable, thank you!

  • @stephennicholas1590
    @stephennicholas1590 4 роки тому +2

    ‘The telos we’re offering to our young people is nightmarish.’
    -Ken Wilber

  • @jondoe6926
    @jondoe6926 2 роки тому +1

    Where is part 2? Where does this go? I mean, the bubble has to pop at some point. This is literally a summary of our times. Does anyone know how insanely important this conversation is? lol. Oh my gosh. I mean, I know.

  • @illuminatedcollective578
    @illuminatedcollective578 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you Ken. I have utilized and applied your conceptualizations for about 10 years. They have helped me get through the hazardous materials within on in this secular path. Looking to converse about the data I have acquired on this path. I would like more formation of this data. Picture me as a extension of your program. Please don't waste my messages.
    These are not advanced values. They are very essential, and neutral. Though it may be a long path to come to them, one must already retain these values to be able to not have them according to kens dualism repression (relativity) dynamic.
    Ken Wilber has understandings that I have felt go before this life individually. Past life identities within my mind have an attractive force to the contents of his words and the formation.
    Filters man ,there are many negative vibes on the conventional social filter. However I am in the motions of applying a new filter.
    Please help Ken. I also retain information that could be beneficial to this.

    • @blacksagetao514
      @blacksagetao514 4 роки тому

      Mr Wilber does not read comments.
      If I'm understanding what you are saying correctly you're seeing we must transcend and include All stages of development.

  • @jondoe6926
    @jondoe6926 2 роки тому +1

    I guess this just keeps going until the center forms a yellow point of reference. Actually, we already have yellow. It just doens't have any power yet.

  • @kanchokomancho4854
    @kanchokomancho4854 2 роки тому +1

    When you say one thing and someone hears / interprets it as another thing, and as soon as you repeat what you said in a slower manner and in simpler terms, a similar misinterpretation is repeated, then it is usually the end of adult rational discussion, because it becomes clear that you are not talking to an openminded rational person who is genuinely curious and eager for knowledge, but you are talking to several layers of ideological filters, worldview scripts and defensive narcissism, and it is time for you to politely step away from that table or switch the subject in a light and playfull way,… or that you at least stop talking
    #InnerSmile #AcceptWhatIs

  • @jondoe6926
    @jondoe6926 2 роки тому +2

    You know what the funny thing is? I've always been waiting for green to emerge. The thing is, it's been here for decades. Hence why we are seeing such pathological expressions of green. How could green be so unhealthy if but it already having been here for a long period of time. I wish I was 300 years old, it would be much more clear.

  • @adityadwivedi1223
    @adityadwivedi1223 Рік тому

    #Sapce is playing a game in space.
    There is no existential ethics rather exsistence of ethics exsist in human conciousness due to the ability of conciousness to frame intention and ethics is also an intention to verify the righteousness of intention by analysing the righteousness of "how intention is getting framed?" and "for what purpose it is getting framed?" to ensure righteousness of means and end altogether.
    The presence of matter in conciousness constitute human body which act as efficient cause for mind and mind act as final cause for material and both altogether act as ground for exsistence of ethics in human conciousness and when human conciousness rises above body and mind or human limits or to say when human conciousness transcends itself then that person becomes free from ethics.
    The law of duality in conciousness is material, efficient, formal and final cause of epistemology therefore ethics is based on analysing the duality of means and end.
    Duality appear as value vs fact, feeling vs logic, overview vs details, Communism vs capitalism, Empiricism vs Rationality.
    This all game of epistemology is happening in the metaphysics of conciousness.

  • @nueythepyasuwan
    @nueythepyasuwan 4 роки тому

    Hi Ken Wilber. Do you have any commentary on GI Gurdjieff? Thank you for your insights.

  • @Jazzgriot
    @Jazzgriot 3 роки тому

    Ken has the Green level down by pat. I've witnessed what he's talking about first hand.

  • @cosmimindalheartra
    @cosmimindalheartra 3 роки тому +2

    I don’t understand this idea that equity is absolutized. As a consumer of leftist or even far leftist culture (not the way the right wing would characterize far left) no one actually says or believes what Ken is saying green believes. It seems a mischaracterization that skews the whole analysis. Absolute equality in his analysis is not the demand. It’s the end of grotesque oppression, and accommodation for the impact of the oppression. Not absolute equality of outcome. The problem it seems here is he’s tuned into the skewed critique of the left by the right and not the actual discourse of the left.

    • @alchemyst2000
      @alchemyst2000 2 роки тому +1

      I think that’s a fair point. And I think he’s making some exaggerations to make a point but I have witnessed the absolutism and suppression coming from unhealthy green and I think it can be seen in the culture wars and the far left ideology.

    • @Mike_Lennox
      @Mike_Lennox 2 роки тому

      Counterwill is a defense mechanism that is triggered where we have not developed the emotional capacity and boundaries to manage the force of others' behavior.
      Counterwill gets triggered where the given hierarchy of social forces does not support our viewpoint.
      Counterwill gets triggered where we feel others are not complying with the hierarchy to which we have resigned.
      Counterwill and resignation are the behavior of people that have not developed a conscious autonomous Will.
      Polarization of views shows up where children are socialized to believe (resign), and not experience (transcend) authority- most predominantly their parents.
      An individual that experiences human behavior has developed a will (emotional capacity, boundaries, and social skills) to manage meanings and social forces as they are.
      An individual that believes human-behavior, resists the force of others by becoming an opposing disconnected viewpoint of "don't tell me what to do!". In contrast, a person that has developed an autonomous Will, will consciously consider the cause of a complaint, grievance, or social problem because they can. And because an autonomous Will is able to accommodate the concerns of others without defaulting to the disempowered perspectives of a child trapped by an immature parent.

  • @matiapolano1552
    @matiapolano1552 4 роки тому +1

    I seems like he doesn't really answer the question and sticks to the unhealthy Green culture war thing. I wish he'd answer the question more directly.

  • @Devon_maloy
    @Devon_maloy 2 роки тому

    So, no.

  • @kanchokomancho4854
    @kanchokomancho4854 2 роки тому

    When you say one thing and someone hears / interprets it as another thing, and as soon as you repeat what you said in a slower manner and in simpler terms, a similar misinterpretation is repeated, then it is usually the end of adult rational discussion, because it becomes clear that you are not talking to an openminded rational person who is genuinely curious and eager for knowledge, but you are talking to several layers of ideological filters, worldview scripts and defensive narcissism, and it is time for you to politely step away from that table or switch the subject in a light and playfull way,… or that you at least stop talking
    #InnerSmile #AcceptWhatIs