I saw another review of this van and knew instantly that THIS is our next van for sure! I love Ford, I love the rear bed/garage arrangement, I love everything except the decals outside. Perfect for long solo travels or shorter holidays with the family - exactly what I’m looking for. I can’t wait to order the automatic.
Personally, i love this van, well done Peter. Sod the folk who bat you down thinking they all know better. you play a brilliant role and show and review in a fantastic calm manor. We love you ... well the missus does 😂
FINALLY, something innovative and interesting from a British mainstream builder. No mention of power, water and grey water capacity BUT enough information to wet the appetite. I will be interested to see what they do with the larger version….a wider main bed hopefully!
We got a VERY early look at this model, so not all the spec was available at the time. Power? 170hp engine - manual or auto Water? 65 litres fresh, 55 litres grey waste The longer Trekker X does have a wider bed. Brochure quotes 1.85m x 1.36m
This could possibly be an award winner peter they have really done their homework what a full departure for the swift design language really refreshing.
There's another review of both on UA-cam. After seeing it I fancy the smaller one. The layout of the X is different slightly and is a bit tighter across the kitchen width. Not by much but the smaller looks easier to mover around which may sound odd.
Good review, thanks. I like it, packs a decent spec into a compact van. Driveway and car park friendly. Liked the Bailey Endeavour too but that’s too big for a daily driver. So looking closely at 5.4/5.5m vans (we currently have a VW Transporter conversion) and will be watching your reviews of alternatives with interest.
@@MotorhomeCampervan Yes thanks, I saw the Malibu review, it’s on the shortlist. I will try to demo the Swift Trekker when it arrives in a dealer and take it from there.
What a great looking van. Swift has done an excellent job on this Ford. A lot better looking than the Bailey's offering in my opinion. I'd certainly have the longer X version for the extra price. Great video, peter.
Looks really good value for money. Cheaper even than the recent Bailey Endeavours, but I think this looks better and has more practical storage. Do you know if it comes with a reversing camera? The official brochure is a little light on full spec details! Thanks.
I checked this. The Swift Trekker definitely does not come with one as standard (which is strange as pretty much everything else you need is) but you can easily have one retro-fitted by the dealer. That's what I plan to do if we go for it.
Great video Peter, and a really nice van from swift. So many original features, and it looks absolutely cracking inside. Im not too keen on the decals though, I prefer to blend into the background when out wild camping. Also I think they should offer this van without a pop up roof. But a stunning van for the money.
I didn't think that I would use the pop top on my old VW but it was a great hidyhole for an afternoon nap, cool on hot sticky nights and somewhere to sleep when my wife was snoring.
It's great to see Swift following the demand for a modern adventure 4x4 style campervan. The wooden slats are a very popular style at the moment. The bed feels cozy with fewer windows but I wonder if that's enough in warm weather? for the price, I'd say it's ideal, some of the ones we looked at when we visited the NEC Show were over the 100k mark!
1.84m L for the bed is cutting it a bit close ? I suppose you have the pop top but still they would have better off actually fitting real widening pods in the wall instead of fake ones ? Like the new colour grade on the video by the way !!
In the USA these rigs cost around $185,000. I am constantly frustrated as to why nearly everything RV is 2x expensive in the USA and FAR lower quality. Can anyone tell me why?
American dealers sell what they have so why would they change !!!!! There is Americans on here I follow and I'm always amazed at the low quality of motorhomes and low mpg considering the vastness of the good ole usa.
For example, Alan Heath (Europe) campervan channel often shows impressive and innovative vans, then states it sells for 95 thousand Euros (approx $100 thousand.) How can that be? @projectpete this is a great question???
Does it have fly screens? Any reason to go with the whale water heater onboard instead of under slung. What space heating is fitted. What size of lpg tanks, prefer underslung tbh. Other than those queries be good to see the bigger sibling…
Peter, what a lovely van. You mention a pop top is standard in both, don’t suppose they have indicated they will be doing a pure 2 bed, which is what we are after. That would then allow a roof light in the back and in the wet room. Also could the bed length be boosted, I’m 6ft 4 by doing away with the headboard? Lots of nice touches, not seen elsewhere, zip shaped bag, swivel work surface extension. Lots of thought gone into it.
Don't know about the new transit, but the old one didn't have that well of a reputation among motorhomers. I personally don't like it, the wider Fiat/Peugeot/Citroën platform remains my personal favorite.
@@ab-ym3bfproblem with the fiat Ducato bases they are all using are fiats still rust everywhere after a few years and they have electrical problems and cheap components throughout . They look pretty and their mpg is the best but 60-70 k is a load of Dosh for said issues..that without talking about fiat engines.. I'm still looking !
@@ph5056 what bollocks you spout. Fiat Ducato is one of the few that uses galvanised steel, my 2008 has not a dot of rust on it, contrary to many Mercedes, VW or Ford. The first 2 are notorious for rust. As for engines, the only problematic engine was the 2.2 liter 100 hp, which happened to be a Ford engine. The 2.3 and 3 liter Iveco are perfect, my 3L hdi has almost run 600k and is doing fine, passing mot every year. I'm not familiar with electrical issues for ducato, just Ford (the previous model). But keep looking, we all have our own preferences, experiences and prejudices.
You'd have to watch the weight as the gas struts need to be able to cope with lifting the lid (or you could remove any boards before raising it). Also, drilling into the top would need care with sealant and would invalidate the warranty as far as water ingress is concerned. The maker of the roof (SCA) should be able to advise further.
Do you really need 4x4? You could fit off-road tyres, which would be all most owners really need. Battery upgrade (lithium) should be easy to achieve. Induction hob is a lot less convenient than gas in a 'van really and needs a very expensive upgrade to batteries plus an inverter.
@@MotorhomeCampervan I actually dont know exactly if I would *need* a 4x4, but Im a landscape photographer, live in northern Europe and Scotland, so there's a lot of dirt-and off-roads, mountains, snow and ice - so 4x4 would be preferrable I think. Gas vs induction is not a dealbreaker, but induction would be safer, and since I travel with a lot of electronics (cameras, drones, laptop etc) a beefy electric system would be preferrable anyway IMO
@@Lucaemar There's a large cost for 4x4 and increased fuel consumption, too, so you need to be sure you need it. Otherwise, you can upgrade a mainstream model with suitable tyres, then add more solar, lithium batteries, inverter for off-grid living
Evening Peter, great vid once again and a very nice looking pop top. Seems in the comments there is a lot of ideas that could be put in the commercial van if this is the proto type, some good suggestions. For me size and price is quiet nice...maybe splash out on the X and automatic, but time will tell. Love watching the new and ongoing innovations these companies come up with and you get to show us all around. Till next time Pete.
That is a beautiful van although one we would never buy, as the only walking / cycling we do is to a pub which tbh is never to far away from we are 🙂 But seems like a great choice for the more adventerous traveller, great review as always my friend, take care, Trev Debz and Tyler
Just don't think there would be sufficient demand for a company the size of Swift. You could always raise the suspension and fit off-road tyres - enough for most folk.
Looks like an interesting design, and so glad manufacturers are allowing customers to sit up in bed now! Shame about the race boy yellow decals outside and the grim grey interior. I think it would be depressing on a rainy day.
It's a different beast, a bit bigger, so less likely to be a daily driver. But it's great value too as it undercuts many VWs on price (the T6.1 is an expensive van)
Great review, look forward to the 6m version. Finally a decent affordable UK built rear fixed bed van. Definite contender when we replace our Malibu. This is what Bailey should had made when they launched their Endeavour models. Though not sure about accessing the drawers once the bed is down, or the rear is full of gear. Hopefully they’ll modify that.
Найгірше ліжко, яке тільки можна уявити у фургоні. Якщо ваш зріст більше за 1.65 у вас ніколи не буде видчуття , що ви гарно виспалися та відсуваєте приплив енергії для нового дня.
Really like this its just a shame its on the ford with its list of engines issues. I understand it keeps the price down using the transit but would have loved to see it on the MAN chassis. Im currently in the market for my first camper in this price range but just cant bring myself to wait 9-18 months for a new van to arrive so much can change in that time . Will need to be a second hand purchase if no one is holding decent stock
The Ford is very popular and the only alternative to Fiat/Peugeot at this price point. The MAN/Crafter is great but expensive. Have you seen my review of the Hillside Hopton - not much dearer and Hillside usually have them in stock. ua-cam.com/video/tJ_1WLWZYuM/v-deo.html
@MotorhomeCampervan thanks for that I'll have e look at now , looks like another really good option. How would you say the trekker compares to the chausson 550x as an occasional 4 berth ? I know it's not a van conversion but it's so close it's an option for small Highland and island villages we'll be visiting mostly being glasgow based
Purely subjective comment but I never got on with the Ducato based chassis , horrid set up. The transit however drives like a dream . Nice review as always thank you!
A fantastic camper at a reasonable (for 2024) price. It's hard to find anything wrong with it. I'm tempted to go and have a look at the larger model as the extra space doesn't come with that much extra cost. The cost of automatic gearbox is very reasonable and I can't see them selling many manual models.
Surprisingly, dealers are ordering manuals, too - perhaps because of the younger demographic? I'd go for the auto as it's a well-priced option and should hold its price better
Well i like it, nice to see a different chassis to a fiat ducato or a very expensive Sprinter. Defo aimed at the younger market with families. I would buy ones of these in a heart beat. The only thing i would like to see is a lounge that converts in to a bed at the rear like their over models. This van would defo be an upgrade to my current t6.1 and has all the toys that i am missing; outdoor gas and shower connections. I would be proud to own this and once i sell my current van i think i will be ordering the x larger model. Peter will you be reviewing the x soon?
Congratulations - we are planning on ordering our Malibu in the next few weeks. Bit concerned about how long we will have to wait for delivery. Think the sleeping area is much better in the Malibu than the Trekker
I agree. We are buying the 640 version specifically for the length ways beds. The Trekker shown would be too small for our needs - but it’s still a cracking looking van 😊
I enjoyed the swift Swift review, (pun intended). Certainly missed out a lot of things like fresh/grey water storage, spare wheel, drive around. Would like to have seen you getting to the top of the van up that large ladder, I bet it was not easy to do a 180 at the top. . Then climb in & do another 180. Will look forward to a full review ;)
There's more info here - www.outandaboutlive.co.uk/motorhomes/news/new-swift-campervan-for-2024-on-the-full-sized-ford-transit We didn't get to drive it as this was an exclusive preview before the dealer/press launch. Going up to the top bed not too difficult and you don't have to turn around once up there, due to headroom at the rear of the roof. Hopefully, a full review will follow
Makes me laugh when people say that it needs 4wd 🙄 If you truly need 4wd you wouldn’t want a kitchen and bathroom in the back with pots and pans and your wee sloshing all over the floor. Some decent tyres (M+S 3pk) and some extra ground clearance would be more than ample for anything a van this size would have to deal with.
Why are half the developers convinced that these NOT comfortable passenger seats should still exist? Please provide statistics that indicate that the vertical seat back is comfortable and does not harm health, especially on long trips?! And in your case, it is even worse, because it has a niche, and the backs of the seats acquire a profile in the form of the letter "C"
I don’t see where you would have space to store bulky items like awnings levelling blocks etc when driving. I also get frustrated with Swift when they advertise these vans as adventurous when they insist on fitting small inboard gas lockers rather than underslung gas tanks which a lot of other manufacturers do. It will be interesting to see what the payload is for these vans because I seriously doubt you will get enough to pack everything you need for a family of 4 to go anywhere. Nice review though
There’s tons of room under the bed when it’s down. Just like the typical continental vans that have been making these for years. Though not keen on the drawers underneath as they will be impossible to access.
@@MotorhomeCampervan there are over 200 lpg filling locations in the uk but even more in Europe where many of these vans will probably go. I have had no issues filling my lpg bottles in the uk.
I guess one option is to use the tie downs to store something like a Fiamma Cargo Back Luggage Bag. For overnighters the poptop could negate the need to unpack.
Nice but why didn't they go that extra step of actually making it AWD? Ford do an AWD variant for the transit, and while I appreciate it would have pushed up the price £5K, I think it would have been worth it to make it authentic, and not just something that looks rugged. If you are interested in this type of vehicle you probably have 'adventure' in mind, and while that doesn't mean serious offroading, it might include rutted tracks in the Canaries, or snow laden roads in the Alps. This feels like a missed opportunity to compete with the Hymer Grand Canyon Crossover at a reasonable price.
@@MotorhomeCampervan There are 100s of other campervans out there, other buyers are probably not in the market for a 'rugged' campervan anyway. Those off-road tyres will hit the MPG just as much, and realistically this will be no different offroad than any other campervan with or without them. So this just seems like a dud, it is neither one or the other, calling it Trekker is a marketing stretch. Confined to tarmac, more expensive to buy and run. I guess people might like how it looks, but enough to spend the extra money? The AWD/Adventure campervan market might not be as big, but that is the target market for this, and I can't see those people compromising.
Thank you Peter, excellent review! It doesn’t look like it comes with any solar panels on the roof, nor any mention of lithium batteries. Perhaps the poptop limits the solar panels, although I’ve seen some manufacturers in the US manage to include them. Doesn’t Westfalia also have a solar panel with its poptop? Could lithium be installed without affecting the warranty? Thanks again.
Very few vans come with lithium from the factory - most are plugged in on campsites. It could be installed later if needed without affecting warranty on van and engine
@@IverKnackerov Thanks. I guess I’m used to the United States where probably the majority of camper van owners camp off-grid, rather than stay in camp sites and plug in. Similarly, air conditioning is a must in the summer, even is small vans. But wouldn’t it be needed in the summer in Spain etc.?
I have owned a pop top ( Renault trafic) for 3 years now. I can count on one hand how many times it's been warm enough to sleep in overnight. I mainly elevate it for standing. Also it fits under 2.1 meter height barriers. Calling it TREKKER somewhat pretentious as it gives an off grid image. If you are going to off grid then a sufficient solar system is needed and IMO diesel heating. Bailey have got it right with the new ENDEAVOUR. cooking is done by gas so a smaller gas bottle is suitable. As far as gas heating ( for off grid purposes) is concerned a friend of mine went to the tan hill pub in winter and off gridded in his caravan. he spent that much money heating on gas that it would have been less expensive to go on a site and pay for electricity. I advised him to fit an all in one diesel heater so he can legally run it on cheaper red diesel. why manufacturers are not fitting diesel heating for water and habitation is beyond me.😅
Likes…. Good price, internal decor finish, and they’ve crammed a lot into a transit base. A full bathroom in a 5.5m van with a garage is some achievement. Not so liking… lack of light up front, downstairs bed too short for anyone 6ft and over … but I suppose there has to be compromise somewhere. It’s a good van …good review 👍 370kg payload on Trekker X is verging on being too small - add 3 passengers and some fresh water, and thats not leaving much at all
Very nicely furnished. But they need do offer a 4x4 version. side mounted rear bunks would be good as well. There are 4x4 models just like this made by KARMANN.
@@sivelo5021”this type of van”? It’s the same as every other short campervan. Just some graphics and a paint job. Most will be on a campsite, plugged into the mains most of the time. Same marketing angle as SUV’s
Certainly has more "adventure type" features than a run of the mill campervan. I think this is the market segment they're aiming for hence the AT tyres would be perfect. @@IverKnackerov
Those cushions making up the bottom bed looked uneven, need to work out where you will keep your mattress topper if you want decent sleep. Oh and where to keep the pillows and other bed clothes if you want the bed in the up position to travel with your bikes (err, which then you leave outside to be stolen once you go to bed?). Obviously aimed at young families but I wonder how many young families have the money and the interest. What Swift need to do is design a motorhome fitted with a Stannah stairlift.
The bed is flat once the mattress sections are in place and it's on plastic springs, so you certainly won't need a topper. You could always carry folding bikes with the bed in the down position.
@@MotorhomeCampervan Thanks for the suggestions. I do like the look of the Bailey B64, but downstairs storage seems limited, with no where obvious for normal touring junk like hook up cables, camping chairs, bbq's etc. Plus I really do like the look of this Swift, and the shorter length is ideal for my drive.
It's like a van that's been designed by a class full of primary school children, child sized bathroom, child sized rear bed. And the body graphics?.....like a clowns car in a circus.
Personally I think this van is horrible. Ugly. Bed is a nightmare. I don’t get the current obsession for putting pop tops on what should be comfortable vans for one or two people. Just fit a high top to give standing room. I predict in two years pop tops will only be seen on Transporter size vans. And yes, the Bailey Transit is way better.
If you don't need the pop-top then leave it down - you should still have easier resale. Why is the bed a nightmare? Leave it made up and with Duvalay matttress on springs you won't find a more comfy bed.
@@MotorhomeCampervan OK, but I’m paying for a pop top I neither want nor need. I want a high top with a mattress that isn’t multiple pieces and needs a Duvalay topper. Fortunately there are lots of continental built vans that fit the bill. But great review as always, you are really valued by your many followers.
Have you looked at Bailey's Endeavour? - ua-cam.com/video/wAiTR8idkCQ/v-deo.html Or the Murvi Pimento (also available on Ford) - ua-cam.com/video/bfHBCKwgIrs/v-deo.html The Trekker layout is hugely popular but it won't be for everyone.
@@MotorhomeCampervan I see what you mean, the Swift is based on the Transit 350, I assumed wrongly that it was based on the Custom. I didn’t even realise the Custom and 350 were different platforms. A Transit used to be just a Transit in different lengths and heights. But, does the 350 still have a wet belt or is that just for unlucky Custom owners?
I saw another review of this van and knew instantly that THIS is our next van for sure! I love Ford, I love the rear bed/garage arrangement, I love everything except the decals outside. Perfect for long solo travels or shorter holidays with the family - exactly what I’m looking for. I can’t wait to order the automatic.
Great news. They should be in the dealers very soon
@@rabmcleod3508how often are you changing the oil?
Personally, i love this van, well done Peter. Sod the folk who bat you down thinking they all know better. you play a brilliant role and show and review in a fantastic calm manor. We love you ... well the missus does 😂
Awww. So kind - thank you!
Love the mauve sock to shoe seamless continuity transition at 3.40 😂
Yes ...me as well...so sassy!
It even happens in Hollywood! LOL
I rented a motorhome last year from Swift and I loved it. Edinburgh…
FINALLY, something innovative and interesting from a British mainstream builder. No mention of power, water and grey water capacity BUT enough information to wet the appetite.
I will be interested to see what they do with the larger version….a wider main bed hopefully!
We got a VERY early look at this model, so not all the spec was available at the time.
Power? 170hp engine - manual or auto
Water? 65 litres fresh, 55 litres grey waste
The longer Trekker X does have a wider bed. Brochure quotes 1.85m x 1.36m
This could possibly be an award winner peter they have really done their homework what a full departure for the swift design language really refreshing.
Totally agree. Very refreshing
Brilliant…..ship mine to the US please…..,ta.
Looks amazing Peter and looks like a real quality build. Well done Swift
Another excellent presentation, well done sir!
Thank you! Cheers!
I like ❤ I’d like to see the longer version
Bigger bed, bigger fridge and a bit more room in the lounge in the X
@@MotorhomeCampervanSame size washroom?
There's another review of both on UA-cam. After seeing it I fancy the smaller one. The layout of the X is different slightly and is a bit tighter across the kitchen width. Not by much but the smaller looks easier to mover around which may sound odd.
Good review, thanks. I like it, packs a decent spec into a compact van. Driveway and car park friendly. Liked the Bailey Endeavour too but that’s too big for a daily driver. So looking closely at 5.4/5.5m vans (we currently have a VW Transporter conversion) and will be watching your reviews of alternatives with interest.
Have you checked out the campervan playlist? We've recently tested 5.4m models from Malibu and Laika
@@MotorhomeCampervan Yes thanks, I saw the Malibu review, it’s on the shortlist. I will try to demo the Swift Trekker when it arrives in a dealer and take it from there.
I am very impressed, thanks for the review
That’s class. I got on on a Merc medium wheel base sprinter but to do this much inside is class
I think Swift have smashed it with this van. Well done👏
What a great looking van. Swift has done an excellent job on this Ford. A lot better looking than the Bailey's offering in my opinion. I'd certainly have the longer X version for the extra price. Great video, peter.
The Bailey and Swift are very different in layout and design, aimed at different customers I feel.
I look forward to a full test of the Trekker!
Looks really good value for money. Cheaper even than the recent Bailey Endeavours, but I think this looks better and has more practical storage. Do you know if it comes with a reversing camera? The official brochure is a little light on full spec details! Thanks.
I checked this. The Swift Trekker definitely does not come with one as standard (which is strange as pretty much everything else you need is) but you can easily have one retro-fitted by the dealer. That's what I plan to do if we go for it.
Really interested. When are we likely to see a review of the larger version please? Would like to compare.
Nothing definite yet but we'd like to review the 'X' version if Swift can supply one
Great video Peter, and a really nice van from swift. So many original features, and it looks absolutely cracking inside.
Im not too keen on the decals though, I prefer to blend into the background when out wild camping.
Also I think they should offer this van without a pop up roof.
But a stunning van for the money.
The pop-top will probably help resale and it cuts down on choice, so the dealers don't have the "wrong" version in stock. Just choose manual or auto
I didn't think that I would use the pop top on my old VW but it was a great hidyhole for an afternoon nap, cool on hot sticky nights and somewhere to sleep when my wife was snoring.
@@MotorhomeCampervan great video! Is the poptop manual or motorized?
@@MotorhomeCampervan yes I would Personally go for the pop up, but I just feel it should be an option.
It's great to see Swift following the demand for a modern adventure 4x4 style campervan. The wooden slats are a very popular style at the moment. The bed feels cozy with fewer windows but I wonder if that's enough in warm weather? for the price, I'd say it's ideal, some of the ones we looked at when we visited the NEC Show were over the 100k mark!
Yes, it's very well priced
Does any one know if the shorter version accommodate a second leisure battery?
Answered my question is automatic extra? Am in West yorkshire where can you buy them?
Auto option £1795. Find your nearest dealer here - www.swiftgroup.co.uk/find-a-dealer/
1.84m L for the bed is cutting it a bit close ? I suppose you have the pop top but still they would have better off actually fitting real widening pods in the wall instead of fake ones ? Like the new colour grade on the video by the way !!
In the USA these rigs cost around $185,000. I am constantly frustrated as to why nearly everything RV is 2x expensive in the USA and FAR lower quality. Can anyone tell me why?
American dealers sell what they have so why would they change !!!!! There is Americans on here I follow and I'm always amazed at the low quality of motorhomes and low mpg considering the vastness of the good ole usa.
For example, Alan Heath (Europe) campervan channel often shows impressive and innovative vans, then states it sells for 95 thousand Euros (approx $100 thousand.) How can that be? @projectpete this is a great question???
The price is what the customer will bear ! 🤔🇬🇧
Because they're mugs for paying it
@@virgilcurtin2664 exactly !
Does it have fly screens? Any reason to go with the whale water heater onboard instead of under slung. What space heating is fitted. What size of lpg tanks, prefer underslung tbh.
Other than those queries be good to see the bigger sibling…
Yes to flyscreens. Whale space heating AND boiler.
Nice van peter...is this trekker slightly shorter than the bailey endeavour b62?
Yes, 5.53m v 5.98m. The Trekker X is also 5.98m
Peter, what a lovely van. You mention a pop top is standard in both, don’t suppose they have indicated they will be doing a pure 2 bed, which is what we are after. That would then allow a roof light in the back and in the wet room. Also could the bed length be boosted, I’m 6ft 4 by doing away with the headboard? Lots of nice touches, not seen elsewhere, zip shaped bag, swivel work surface extension. Lots of thought gone into it.
I think the non pop top version is called the Carrera
If you're 6ft 4in you won't fit. You'll need to look for a camper with lengthways sleeping, probably on a 6.36m Fiat
It’s good to see it on a transit.
Just don't search for issues with the engine and its wet cambelt.
@oliverbrookes27 if Ford made it a wet belt, why not go back to a chain? Seems daft to me.
Don't know about the new transit, but the old one didn't have that well of a reputation among motorhomers.
I personally don't like it, the wider Fiat/Peugeot/Citroën platform remains my personal favorite.
@@ab-ym3bfproblem with the fiat Ducato bases they are all using are fiats still rust everywhere after a few years and they have electrical problems and cheap components throughout . They look pretty and their mpg is the best but 60-70 k is a load of Dosh for said issues..that without talking about fiat engines.. I'm still looking !
@@ph5056 what bollocks you spout.
Fiat Ducato is one of the few that uses galvanised steel, my 2008 has not a dot of rust on it, contrary to many Mercedes, VW or Ford. The first 2 are notorious for rust.
As for engines, the only problematic engine was the 2.2 liter 100 hp, which happened to be a Ford engine. The 2.3 and 3 liter Iveco are perfect, my 3L hdi has almost run 600k and is doing fine, passing mot every year.
I'm not familiar with electrical issues for ducato, just Ford (the previous model).
But keep looking, we all have our own preferences, experiences and prejudices.
Lovely x it's more fantasy
A fantastic launch review Peter, well done, really enjoyed.
Only thing that was missing would be a Top Gear Bill Woollard pose!🫡
Not sure how that goes. Will Google Woollard!
Can roof bars or surfboard carrying side bars be added effectively
You'd have to watch the weight as the gas struts need to be able to cope with lifting the lid (or you could remove any boards before raising it). Also, drilling into the top would need care with sealant and would invalidate the warranty as far as water ingress is concerned.
The maker of the roof (SCA) should be able to advise further.
Magic shoes
This gets really close to the ideal van I've imagined! However I'd prefer it in 4WD, and with more battery and an induction stove rather than gas 🤔
Do you really need 4x4? You could fit off-road tyres, which would be all most owners really need.
Battery upgrade (lithium) should be easy to achieve.
Induction hob is a lot less convenient than gas in a 'van really and needs a very expensive upgrade to batteries plus an inverter.
@@MotorhomeCampervan I actually dont know exactly if I would *need* a 4x4, but Im a landscape photographer, live in northern Europe and Scotland, so there's a lot of dirt-and off-roads, mountains, snow and ice - so 4x4 would be preferrable I think.
Gas vs induction is not a dealbreaker, but induction would be safer, and since I travel with a lot of electronics (cameras, drones, laptop etc) a beefy electric system would be preferrable anyway IMO
@@Lucaemar There's a large cost for 4x4 and increased fuel consumption, too, so you need to be sure you need it.
Otherwise, you can upgrade a mainstream model with suitable tyres, then add more solar, lithium batteries, inverter for off-grid living
Evening Peter, great vid once again and a very nice looking pop top. Seems in the comments there is a lot of ideas that could be put in the commercial van if this is the proto type, some good suggestions. For me size and price is quiet nice...maybe splash out on the X and automatic, but time will tell. Love watching the new and ongoing innovations these companies come up with and you get to show us all around. Till next time Pete.
That is a beautiful van although one we would never buy, as the only walking / cycling we do is to a pub which tbh is never to far away from we are 🙂 But seems like a great choice for the more adventerous traveller, great review as always my friend, take care, Trev Debz and Tyler
Thank you, but I think you could enjoy this 'van without being too adventurous
🤣would love to get back into vanning but 71k does my head in!
Really nice van by Swift. Just disappointed they didn’t offer a 4WD and lifted version as a true adventure off road van.
Just don't think there would be sufficient demand for a company the size of Swift.
You could always raise the suspension and fit off-road tyres - enough for most folk.
What an amazing van 👍 I wonder if they will offer it on the AWD🤔
Not initially but it might happen if demand was there but remember that Swift is a volume player, 4x4 is maybe too niche
Agreed …4 wheel drive is unnecessary complex and costly. Better to fit all season or winter tyres
Is there not an issue for Transits engines that are not used regularly
Seems to be more down to oil changes being too infrequent or quality of oil used
Looks like an interesting design, and so glad manufacturers are allowing customers to sit up in bed now! Shame about the race boy yellow decals outside and the grim grey interior. I think it would be depressing on a rainy day.
this is far better than VW campers and not far off in prices too.
It's a different beast, a bit bigger, so less likely to be a daily driver. But it's great value too as it undercuts many VWs on price (the T6.1 is an expensive van)
Great review, look forward to the 6m version. Finally a decent affordable UK built rear fixed bed van. Definite contender when we replace our Malibu. This is what Bailey should had made when they launched their Endeavour models. Though not sure about accessing the drawers once the bed is down, or the rear is full of gear. Hopefully they’ll modify that.
We've already suggested tambour doors for the rear storage
Love it how much
£70,995
Найгірше ліжко, яке тільки можна уявити у фургоні. Якщо ваш зріст більше за 1.65 у вас ніколи не буде видчуття , що ви гарно виспалися та відсуваєте приплив енергії для нового дня.
Really like this its just a shame its on the ford with its list of engines issues. I understand it keeps the price down using the transit but would have loved to see it on the MAN chassis. Im currently in the market for my first camper in this price range but just cant bring myself to wait 9-18 months for a new van to arrive so much can change in that time . Will need to be a second hand purchase if no one is holding decent stock
The Ford is very popular and the only alternative to Fiat/Peugeot at this price point.
The MAN/Crafter is great but expensive. Have you seen my review of the Hillside Hopton - not much dearer and Hillside usually have them in stock.
ua-cam.com/video/tJ_1WLWZYuM/v-deo.html
@MotorhomeCampervan thanks for that I'll have e look at now , looks like another really good option. How would you say the trekker compares to the chausson 550x as an occasional 4 berth ? I know it's not a van conversion but it's so close it's an option for small Highland and island villages we'll be visiting mostly being glasgow based
Purely subjective comment but I never got on with the Ducato based chassis , horrid set up. The transit however drives like a dream .
Nice review as always thank you!
Thanks. We prefer the Ford to drive, too
A fantastic camper at a reasonable (for 2024) price. It's hard to find anything wrong with it. I'm tempted to go and have a look at the larger model as the extra space doesn't come with that much extra cost. The cost of automatic gearbox is very reasonable and I can't see them selling many manual models.
Surprisingly, dealers are ordering manuals, too - perhaps because of the younger demographic? I'd go for the auto as it's a well-priced option and should hold its price better
The auto is a 45kg weight penalty … almost 10% of the available payload
@@IverKnackerov I could always leave my wife behind to save weight.
Brilliant….ship mine to the US please…ta
Well i like it, nice to see a different chassis to a fiat ducato or a very expensive Sprinter. Defo aimed at the younger market with families. I would buy ones of these in a heart beat. The only thing i would like to see is a lounge that converts in to a bed at the rear like their over models. This van would defo be an upgrade to my current t6.1 and has all the toys that i am missing; outdoor gas and shower connections. I would be proud to own this and once i sell my current van i think i will be ordering the x larger model.
Peter will you be reviewing the x soon?
Hope to get one for a full review as soon as we can!
Great review Peter. Was that a solar panel i saw on top of the rising roof? And can i ask how the transit drove and was there any pesky rattles?
The Transit should drive really well with the 170hp engine but I didn't have a chance to drive this one.
Yes, you can see the solar panel at 0:26.
This looks a belter Peter.
Been waiting 16 months for my Malibu - collecting it next week!
Almost wish I hadn’t seen this video 😮
Congratulations - we are planning on ordering our Malibu in the next few weeks. Bit concerned about how long we will have to wait for delivery. Think the sleeping area is much better in the Malibu than the Trekker
I agree. We are buying the 640 version specifically for the length ways beds.
The Trekker shown would be too small for our needs - but it’s still a cracking looking van 😊
How long are you expecting to wait?
I enjoyed the swift Swift review, (pun intended). Certainly missed out a lot of things like fresh/grey water storage, spare wheel, drive around. Would like to have seen you getting to the top of the van up that large ladder, I bet it was not easy to do a 180 at the top. . Then climb in & do another 180. Will look forward to a full review ;)
There's more info here - www.outandaboutlive.co.uk/motorhomes/news/new-swift-campervan-for-2024-on-the-full-sized-ford-transit
We didn't get to drive it as this was an exclusive preview before the dealer/press launch.
Going up to the top bed not too difficult and you don't have to turn around once up there, due to headroom at the rear of the roof.
Hopefully, a full review will follow
good points also, how handy is a ladder that is stowed under the other bed really?
Looking forward to the review of the larger version but the small is one good.
I like them both but the standard Trekker does so well to fit it all into 5.5m
Swift Trekker, a name that suggests it could be taken off the beaten track and yet no all wheel drive. All show and no go!!
How many people need 4x4, or would pay the huge amount extra for it? This is designed for mass appeal
I have damaged site frame. Where do i get new side plastic and widow?
Really like that. Will the extra long version make a 3rd bed behind the drivers seat as well as pop top for when kids get bigger.
No, still just the pop-top bed and rear bed
Makes me laugh when people say that it needs 4wd 🙄
If you truly need 4wd you wouldn’t want a kitchen and bathroom in the back with pots and pans and your wee sloshing all over the floor.
Some decent tyres (M+S 3pk) and some extra ground clearance would be more than ample for anything a van this size would have to deal with.
Why are half the developers convinced that these NOT comfortable passenger seats should still exist? Please provide statistics that indicate that the vertical seat back is comfortable and does not harm health, especially on long trips?! And in your case, it is even worse, because it has a niche, and the backs of the seats acquire a profile in the form of the letter "C"
This is fantastic, although they need to paint the back of the blind surrounds to the front side windows black...
I don’t see where you would have space to store bulky items like awnings levelling blocks etc when driving. I also get frustrated with Swift when they advertise these vans as adventurous when they insist on fitting small inboard gas lockers rather than underslung gas tanks which a lot of other manufacturers do. It will be interesting to see what the payload is for these vans because I seriously doubt you will get enough to pack everything you need for a family of 4 to go anywhere. Nice review though
There’s tons of room under the bed when it’s down. Just like the typical continental vans that have been making these for years. Though not keen on the drawers underneath as they will be impossible to access.
Payload is 530kg
Underslung gas tanks are going out of fashion as owners are finding fewer places to refill them in the UK.
@@MotorhomeCampervan there are over 200 lpg filling locations in the uk but even more in Europe where many of these vans will probably go. I have had no issues filling my lpg bottles in the uk.
I guess one option is to use the tie downs to store something like a Fiamma Cargo Back Luggage Bag. For overnighters the poptop could negate the need to unpack.
Nice but why didn't they go that extra step of actually making it AWD? Ford do an AWD variant for the transit, and while I appreciate it would have pushed up the price £5K, I think it would have been worth it to make it authentic, and not just something that looks rugged. If you are interested in this type of vehicle you probably have 'adventure' in mind, and while that doesn't mean serious offroading, it might include rutted tracks in the Canaries, or snow laden roads in the Alps. This feels like a missed opportunity to compete with the Hymer Grand Canyon Crossover at a reasonable price.
Most buyers don't need or want 4x4 - worse MPG as well as initial cost. Off-road tyres are usually sufficient
@@MotorhomeCampervan There are 100s of other campervans out there, other buyers are probably not in the market for a 'rugged' campervan anyway. Those off-road tyres will hit the MPG just as much, and realistically this will be no different offroad than any other campervan with or without them. So this just seems like a dud, it is neither one or the other, calling it Trekker is a marketing stretch. Confined to tarmac, more expensive to buy and run. I guess people might like how it looks, but enough to spend the extra money? The AWD/Adventure campervan market might not be as big, but that is the target market for this, and I can't see those people compromising.
@@codemonkeyalpha9057 Extra money? It's cheaper than many rivals!
It seems a bit pointless calling it a Trekker and not giving it AWD, apart from that it looks good.
The looks will sell it and most buyers won't need the 4x4 (or want to pay for it)
Thank you Peter, excellent review! It doesn’t look like it comes with any solar panels on the roof, nor any mention of lithium batteries. Perhaps the poptop limits the solar panels, although I’ve seen some manufacturers in the US manage to include them. Doesn’t Westfalia also have a solar panel with its poptop? Could lithium be installed without affecting the warranty? Thanks again.
Very few vans come with lithium from the factory - most are plugged in on campsites. It could be installed later if needed without affecting warranty on van and engine
@@IverKnackerov Thanks. I guess I’m used to the United States where probably the majority of camper van owners camp off-grid, rather than stay in camp sites and plug in. Similarly, air conditioning is a must in the summer, even is small vans. But wouldn’t it be needed in the summer in Spain etc.?
There's a solar panel on the roof but you won't get lithium at this price point
I have owned a pop top ( Renault trafic) for 3 years now. I can count on one hand how many times it's been warm enough to sleep in overnight. I mainly elevate it for standing. Also it fits under 2.1 meter height barriers. Calling it TREKKER somewhat pretentious as it gives an off grid image. If you are going to off grid then a sufficient solar system is needed and IMO diesel heating. Bailey have got it right with the new ENDEAVOUR. cooking is done by gas so a smaller gas bottle is suitable. As far as gas heating ( for off grid purposes) is concerned a friend of mine went to the tan hill pub in winter and off gridded in his caravan. he spent that much money heating on gas that it would have been less expensive to go on a site and pay for electricity. I advised him to fit an all in one diesel heater so he can legally run it on cheaper red diesel. why manufacturers are not fitting diesel heating for water and habitation is beyond me.😅
I saw VW pop-tops roof up at night on the Bailey test with minus 20 degrees at night - that's hardcore!
Wish they would do an option without a pop top, it would make it a little cheaper too.... but it looks good
Downstairs bed is too small for that to be the only option. Plus you lose the option to use the garage in bed-up mode
@@IverKnackerov everyone likes or wants different things.
It keeps it simpler for dealers - just one spec, manual or auto
I wonder if I can rent this
It's only just been launched, so not yet, but they may appear on rental fleets in due course
@@MotorhomeCampervan but not in the US…I rented a Swift motorhome…in Scotland. Loved it.
Hopefully the build quality is better than Swifts we looked at a few years when looking to buy a campervan/motorhome!
Raise the suspension a bit more and add better wheel and offroad combo and it might be able to go offroad...shame there is no 4wd option....
“It’s a Ford” 😉
Likes…. Good price, internal decor finish, and they’ve crammed a lot into a transit base. A full bathroom in a 5.5m van with a garage is some achievement. Not so liking… lack of light up front, downstairs bed too short for anyone 6ft and over … but I suppose there has to be compromise somewhere. It’s a good van …good review 👍
370kg payload on Trekker X is verging on being too small - add 3 passengers and some fresh water, and thats not leaving much at all
370kg is for the auto and you're unlikely to be travelling with four adults
No vent or window in the toilet? Is that right? Have the makers ever used a motorhome toilet?
Yes, there is a vent in the toilet. You can see a plastic moulding on the outside wall
Is there tax added to these prices in the UK? VAT maybe, and if so, what’s the rate? Thanks
20% VAT is included in price quoted
Very nicely furnished. But they need do offer a 4x4 version. side mounted rear bunks would be good as well.
There are 4x4 models just like this made by KARMANN.
Sadly, Karmann is not a brand that's sold in the UK
4wd costs too much ….not necessary for mass market.
A lot to like about this. But why not just fit all terrain tyres from the start. 70k and you’ve got to change them straight away!
Not everyone will want/need all-terrain tyres but not a huge extra cost if you do
@@MotorhomeCampervan With this type of van I’d guess the majority would. No additional cost for the manufacturer, just spec it correctly.
@@sivelo5021”this type of van”? It’s the same as every other short campervan. Just some graphics and a paint job. Most will be on a campsite, plugged into the mains most of the time. Same marketing angle as SUV’s
Certainly has more "adventure type" features than a run of the mill campervan. I think this is the market segment they're aiming for hence the AT tyres would be perfect. @@IverKnackerov
I'd say cross climate types would be a good compromise. It would be mighty embrassing to get stuck on a bit of soft wet grass........
Those cushions making up the bottom bed looked uneven, need to work out where you will keep your mattress topper if you want decent sleep. Oh and where to keep the pillows and other bed clothes if you want the bed in the up position to travel with your bikes (err, which then you leave outside to be stolen once you go to bed?).
Obviously aimed at young families but I wonder how many young families have the money and the interest. What Swift need to do is design a motorhome fitted with a Stannah stairlift.
The bed is flat once the mattress sections are in place and it's on plastic springs, so you certainly won't need a topper.
You could always carry folding bikes with the bed in the down position.
If only diesel heating was an option would be perfect
Maybe you prefer the Bailey, which has diesel heating? Or Murvi convert the Ford too
@@MotorhomeCampervan Thanks for the suggestions. I do like the look of the Bailey B64, but downstairs storage seems limited, with no where obvious for normal touring junk like hook up cables, camping chairs, bbq's etc. Plus I really do like the look of this Swift, and the shorter length is ideal for my drive.
Great review but nope not at that price range - I'd expect it to be 4x4 - to fake looking otherwise
If it was 4x4 it would be a lot more money.
This is seriously good value for a campervan in 2024.
Sorry the Bailey one built on the ford van is way way better
They are VERY different and will appeal to different buyers
BBQ point on the opposite side to the awning🤦🏽.
Ma si trova anche con la guida normale,
Taylor's version
Not interested in the couple drinking tea. Why are you not showing the inside of the campervan???
There is no "couple drinking tea" in this video - just me giving a full review, both inside and out! Watch it in full, perhaps?
No air conditioning?
Not necessary in a small campervan other than in cab. Weighs a lot, not easy to install on a pop top, and uses tons of electricity
Cab air-con but you wouldn't expect habitation air-con in a 'van like this - just pop up the roof and enjoy fresh air
Swift treker solar
Shame it’s the ford wet belt engine, not good reviews
Mi PIACE MOLTO GRAZIE MILLE UA-cam CAMPERA FORD 2024 CULORE GRIGIO SCURO GRAZIE MILLE UA-cam AMEN
Shoes on and off like a yo-yo
70k for this?? Are you all mad??
Not at all. It's extremely good value in 2024 - compare it with other campervans and you'll soon see that
No sink
It's next to the hob!
لا ترسل سيارات مارسيدس انها غالية الثمن ولا تصلح بشيء فيات او افيكو او مان وهذا الصح فقط
Claustrophobic sleeping area at rear with only one opening window , unbearable in hot weather .
Open the back doors then.Never had a problem
Most important campervan in 2024 ….no not really
Why not? It's bound to outsell just about anything else launched in the UK this year
It's like a van that's been designed by a class full of primary school children, child sized bathroom, child sized rear bed. And the body graphics?.....like a clowns car in a circus.
The bed is similar size to most VW campers and the bathroom at least as big as you'd expect in a panel van, if not bigger. It's only a 5.5m long 'van!
5 ft 11 in long bed ? take 2 inches off that for moving about and the bed is only suitable for a dwarf - not good !
1.84m is just over 6ft, similar to some other transverse beds in campervans, especially in narrower panel vans
This design as same as 10years ago
The rear bed layout is a best seller but there's nothing else like it in the UK on a Ford, the detailing is great and so is the price
Shame it’s on a transit, most motorhome dealerships and Ford dealerships are inundated with broken down transits. Put it on a Fiat
The (smaller) Transit Custom is the best-selling vehicle in the UK, outselling any car...
Why look 4x4 if it isn’t
The same applies to 'crossover' cars and pseudo-SUVs - buyers like it!
@@MotorhomeCampervan good point.
Personally I think this van is horrible. Ugly. Bed is a nightmare. I don’t get the current obsession for putting pop tops on what should be comfortable vans for one or two people. Just fit a high top to give standing room. I predict in two years pop tops will only be seen on Transporter size vans. And yes, the Bailey Transit is way better.
If you don't need the pop-top then leave it down - you should still have easier resale.
Why is the bed a nightmare? Leave it made up and with Duvalay matttress on springs you won't find a more comfy bed.
@@MotorhomeCampervan OK, but I’m paying for a pop top I neither want nor need. I want a high top with a mattress that isn’t multiple pieces and needs a Duvalay topper. Fortunately there are lots of continental built vans that fit the bill. But great review as always, you are really valued by your many followers.
It’s a Swift bits will fall off.
I think you'll find their quality has improved considerably
Sadly I can't help but draw the same conclusion.
Yep 100% improvement in quality control would still be dire. Maybe not doing their quality control over the phone would be a start.
This van is not for me hate the lay out
Have you looked at Bailey's Endeavour? - ua-cam.com/video/wAiTR8idkCQ/v-deo.html
Or the Murvi Pimento (also available on Ford) - ua-cam.com/video/bfHBCKwgIrs/v-deo.html
The Trekker layout is hugely popular but it won't be for everyone.
You could at least dressed modern for this important campervan 😂😂
As modern as my wardrobe gets I'm afraid but, if you want to supply some trendier gear, I'll give it a go!
And old Transit too 🤢🤮
A new Transit??
@@MotorhomeCampervan yep, there’s an all new Transit, also platform sharing with VW too.
@@Transporter2084 That's a smaller van, the Transit Custom
@@MotorhomeCampervan I see what you mean, the Swift is based on the Transit 350, I assumed wrongly that it was based on the Custom. I didn’t even realise the Custom and 350 were different platforms. A Transit used to be just a Transit in different lengths and heights.
But, does the 350 still have a wet belt or is that just for unlucky Custom owners?
@@Transporter2084 Same engines in both models
To tall kind of cheap lookin layout
"Cheap looking layout" ?? - It's the most popular campervan layout across Europe