Mandalay Guide vs Thargoids [2025]

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 49

  • @Jadriam
    @Jadriam 3 дні тому +11

    'I am a humble explorer. Let's explore the wreckage of this thargoid vessel!'
    'I see no wreckage.'
    'You're about to.'

  • @Lestat_1760
    @Lestat_1760 3 дні тому +4

    The modshard Mandalay served me well in the Sol battle. With the 4x modshards en 2x TV beams power becomes an issue but you can overcome that by denying power to the cargohatch. Saves some warnings.
    o7 commander

  • @CmdrJT
    @CmdrJT 3 дні тому +1

    Excellent review! I felt the exact same way about the Mandalay.

  • @Lanpea
    @Lanpea 3 дні тому +1

    Great video as always! one question tho, is there a reason why the build uses light weight alloy instead of military grad composite?

    • @Astyrrean
      @Astyrrean  3 дні тому +3

      Speed. AX is speed tanking first and foremost. And agility to a lesser degree. Those builds still have over 2.5k hull which is plenty.
      Also massively decreases your rebuy cost - though that usually matters less.

  • @joetriccas
    @joetriccas 4 дні тому +4

    My ax Mandalay, cocijo’s demise, has 2 mod shards, 2 azimuth mcs and 2 tv beams. Not hydra so capable yet. I guess it’s me ha!!

    • @Astyrrean
      @Astyrrean  4 дні тому +2

      @@joetriccas 2-modshard ships are Hydra capable in their own right. Not easy tho. Medium AZIs suck damage wise tho. Drop them for more mod shards, or switch to gauss.

  • @matthewosborn704
    @matthewosborn704 4 дні тому +2

    Let me see a Corvette review. Only because I just got one 🤣

  • @DarixCn
    @DarixCn 3 дні тому +1

    I fly this thing with 3 mod shards, 1 vent beam and 2 cytoscramblers, annihilates shields

    • @Astyrrean
      @Astyrrean  3 дні тому +2

      Nice … but two Cytos and the med beam probably annihilate your distro!

    • @DarixCn
      @DarixCn 3 дні тому +1

      @ yeah it can’t sustain it but it’s pretty good when in a wing

  • @benniebees
    @benniebees День тому +1

    Is the preference of modshards to be flakless, because it saves you from switching leading/trailing lead reticle? It's quite annoying that modshards need trailing and flak needs leading. But then again, if you are repairing modules, popping repair limpets, and synthing ammo and sinks, might as well add the lead reticle swap to the list of things you do after popping a heart.

    • @Astyrrean
      @Astyrrean  День тому +1

      Reason for no flak is the AXCZ nature of the modshard build, where flak is useless. It’s very possible to use flak without the leading reticle by the way, just needs a little extra practice.

  • @AtlasRandGaming
    @AtlasRandGaming 4 дні тому +7

    So Mandalay or Anaconda?

  • @davidsomervell8388
    @davidsomervell8388 3 дні тому +2

    How does the Mandalays maneuvering profile compare to the Chieftain? The Cheitains maneuverability comes from the fact that it (and the FAS) aren't as affected by the blue zone, unlike the Krait which can barely turn at all at high speeds unless you boost.

    • @Astyrrean
      @Astyrrean  3 дні тому +3

      I have a chart in the vid with the data. Basically the yaw of the Mandy is over 3x that of the Krait (!). All ships are equally affected as far as blue zone bonuses to acceleration and controls are concerned, it’s just that the Krait is a far stiffer log to begin with.

    • @davidsomervell8388
      @davidsomervell8388 3 дні тому +2

      @@Astyrrean You're right, I guess It always felt to me like different ships responded to it differently. Do you know the underlying math of the blue zone? flat amount? percentage based? some kinda weird formula? I hate it when devs hide basic game mechanics :P

    • @Astyrrean
      @Astyrrean  3 дні тому +1

      @@davidsomervell8388 I don’t know the precise math. I can tell you for sure it’s not an “on/off” effect, but more of a gradual effect that increases progress towards the center of the blue zone. I can tell you it does NOT affect acceleration (we tested this extensively). It just (majorly) affects pitch/yaw/roll multipliers. Why don’t you test it yourself and report back? Record videos of you pointing to a background star in empty space, and doing a 360’ yaw/pitch/roll spin (one at a time), at different speed velocities, and measure how much time it takes to get back to starting point?

  • @NoNameIAm
    @NoNameIAm 4 дні тому +2

    great video! do we have any eta of mandalays purchasable with credits?

    • @Astyrrean
      @Astyrrean  4 дні тому +2

      Month or two? Hard to say.

    • @benniebees
      @benniebees День тому

      If the mandy is 2 months out still, we'll be waiting for an eternity to fly the cobra 5 🤔

  • @Tamburello_1994
    @Tamburello_1994 4 дні тому +7

    I mean, just look at it. Too rakish to be just an explorer.

    • @CptJistuce
      @CptJistuce 4 дні тому +1

      It almost looks like it belongs in R-Type.

    • @MarkYale
      @MarkYale 4 дні тому +1

      @@CptJistuce looks like it was pulled right out of it :). Good call.

    • @CptJistuce
      @CptJistuce 4 дні тому +2

      @@MarkYale I actually named mine the Arrowhead.

    • @Tamburello_1994
      @Tamburello_1994 4 дні тому +1

      @@CptJistuce A "TG" refugee... Wow, good on you!

    • @CptJistuce
      @CptJistuce 4 дні тому +2

      @@Tamburello_1994 If TG means TurboGrafX, then sadly I've never had one. I met R-Type initially from the Super Nintendo and PS1.

  • @KaelRead
    @KaelRead 4 дні тому +5

    anaconda is a good xeno fighter 😂 good video though!!

  • @GrahenKraken
    @GrahenKraken 4 дні тому +1

    Is the choice of 1m3s gauss cannons because of power capacity? I'm still a noob when it comes to building ships :)

    • @Astyrrean
      @Astyrrean  4 дні тому +1

      Power distributor limitations.

    • @GrahenKraken
      @GrahenKraken 4 дні тому +1

      @@Astyrrean thanks - looking at EDSY specifically, when I swap one of your build's S for an M, I see that the Prio 4 group goes red. If I understand everything correctly, that means I could *technically* move e.g. Life Support to P5? Not saying it's a good idea, just trying to understand how to think about it :D

    • @Astyrrean
      @Astyrrean  4 дні тому +2

      @ Yeah but power grid isn’t the issue (and even if it was, you probably want to shut the AFMU before you shut life support). The problem is WEP power distributor recharge. With 2m2s gauss at a sustained fire rate, you will massively overdraw your distro recharge and you’ll be at 300% heat in no time.

    • @GrahenKraken
      @GrahenKraken 4 дні тому +1

      @ aaahhhh, now it makes sense! Thanks so much for taking the time (and not RTFM-ing me :D), keep up all of your good work!

  • @FrankGranados
    @FrankGranados 3 дні тому +2

    Now we just need thargoids to test it, since they were kicked out of hip 22460, it feels like there's nothing to do

    • @Astyrrean
      @Astyrrean  3 дні тому +2

      Come to the California Nebula!!

  • @nickfizzle
    @nickfizzle 3 дні тому

    "This modshards mandalay... handily replaces the alliance challenger as the primary alternative to the all popular krait" Said like a minute before spiking to 35% after *3* rounds on a single trigger. I'm sorry, the mandalay may be more maneuverable but the fact that it's distributor *cannot* handle 4m shards at near max firerate means that it doesn't compete in the same space as the chally or the krait. I'm sure it's fun to fly, but being fun to fly doesn't make it better than other ships.

    • @Astyrrean
      @Astyrrean  3 дні тому +1

      I’m a big fan of the Challenger. In both its gauss and modshards popular configs. While it is true that the Mandy has tighter distro constrains than the Chally, it is undeniable that it flys immensely better. Hence the trifecta - want firepower? Go Krait Mk2. Want agility? Go Mandy. Want a mix in between? Hello Chief. Chally has less of a meaningful role now in my opinion.

    • @nickfizzle
      @nickfizzle 3 дні тому

      ​@@Astyrrean Except the chally brings the same firepower to hull that the krait brings while also having more shield strip and enough agility to easily orbit without boosting. The thing the krait brought was versatility with it's L sized hardpoints which are *significantly* less useful now that the war is over and the larger distro which isn't a that big for 4m shards but is huge for mpcs. I never questioned the mandaly's maneuverability, I even said it was more maneuverable than the chally but that's not the only metric you should be rating ships on.

    • @Astyrrean
      @Astyrrean  2 дні тому +1

      @@nickfizzle Krait has a Class 7 PD ... Chally only has a class 6.

    • @nickfizzle
      @nickfizzle 2 дні тому

      @@Astyrrean Yes i noted that the krait has a larger PD than the chally, but it doesn't make much of a difference when you barely overdraw with 4m modshards as is. The only thing you might struggle to exert before it's a problem is hydra, but if that were an issue you wouldn't recommend 4m modshards on the mandalay which has an *even smaller* pd than the chally. What about the chally's non boost orbiting or it's better shield strip?

    • @Astyrrean
      @Astyrrean  2 дні тому +1

      @@nickfizzle You're entitled to your own opinion Nick. That said, I feel vast majority of the community would say that the C7 makes a humongous difference in practice.
      By the way, as I said I am a fan of the Chally. But I also understand its limitations. It can't orbit entirely without boost like the Chief - you do need to give a kick here and there.
      You are right on the shield strip part tho. With 3 small beams (shards) or 1L1S beams plus two cytos (gauss) the shield strip of the Chally is top notch for a medium ship. How much that matters is very situational tho.

  • @seryvouk4966
    @seryvouk4966 3 дні тому

    No, no and no! For me, Mandalay is an explorer, first and foremost.

    • @Astyrrean
      @Astyrrean  3 дні тому +1

      Nobody is denying its capabilities an explorer… just saying it’s a pretty capable combat ship as well!