This reminds me of that scene in Robocop, The Director’s Cut, where ED209 blasts Mr Kinney and keeps blasting and blasting after he’s clearly already dead and turning into chunky salsa😂
God has a plan for all of us. Funny how he can somehow create a path for 7+ billion people but yet can't even look after 2 people 🤣. Really how can anyone believe this gibberish.
would you lock your child in a room, so it cant do anything wrong or stupid?....noo...you would give it its freedom, even risking it can run in feont of a car and die. God bless you
@@sam.83 comparing a god to your parents? At least my parents talk to me and I have a relationship. Not some imaginary relationship with someone I can't see touch or even listen to unless it's in my own head
Add a little self examination and you have the Greek pantheon. A major point of their religion was, "Look at all these powerful immortal beings and how awful they are at everything they do, we need to rise above them." Their infidelities constantly led to them plotting acts of spite against each other, Zeus was a terrible father towards Ares to the point of making Ares pitiable (to me at least after I read the Iliad), and in the end despite all their power they had no control over the Fates and thus the destinies of men. I obviously don't support the Greek pantheon as an answer to the unknowns, or even as role models, but I do actually encourage their use in stories for the purpose of life lessons (and a hint of comedy).
There is a response from the caller on youtube: check out Clip from Atheist Experience #835: caller goes fishing and catches a full dose of Dillahunty. I believe the caller responds by talking about a zombie being locked in a shed/barn on a television show.
You living in USA, England, Italy, Brasil, Norway, Germany, Spain, or in Australia, Tasmania, Serbia, case is a same, people are same, if we talking about Violence in the Bible! The most people accept the Violence in the Bible, because christ. Education&Indoctrin.
The Golden Calf is the flashing blue light. Any rational thinker would look at this and say no way. The Jews have seen the power of god up close yet decide to risk angering him. It just doesn't seem plausible.
IN ONE FAMILY YOU HAVE BELIVERS AND NOTBELIVERS, AND to much conflichts between two Sisters or Brothers in Name of "God", Bible and in Name of Atheism&Science! And you can not change a Mind of your Mother or Brother, me too! Religion sepa rade the people in Family!!! ( My case too!!! )
+asparafish Any and everythign even to people who have not even bothered to read the ridiculous book uses that lame refute "out of context". They are trained and indoctrinated to parrot that phrase to "refute" any claim against their holy book. When people don't even know what the scripture even says are parroting this as their argument that should say it all right there. It's a way of avoiding using critial thinking to avoid cognitive dissonance. Nothing more. Show me the context in which the biblical authorization to enslave and instructions on how to beat your slaves is "moral" and what the "context" is. I"m always interested in seeing desperate narrative spins! :)
+FreeThinking Atheist ....lol! I have to review this video first....but first .....atheists like to use their own phrases like give me "proof".....so before I answer your question.....prove to me your belief that your mother loves you. thanks for listening
asparafish Love is merely a label placed upon real-time and long lasting algorithmic biochemical pattern reactions. Love is also defined differently to different people. Some women are beaten by the ones they believe love them, but I'm guessing you wouldn't quantify that as "love", so right off the bat we have no set definition for what this label "love" even is beyond a state of mind. So, you can't make an equivocation fallacy of basically saying "Well, you can't prove love, therefor my argument for a God and agasint Atheism is valid.". Sorry, but that is not only wildly and dangerously irrational, but it's also absurd logic. The burden of proof is on those making existential claims, not those rejecting said claims. That's why we don't all just accept that Big Foot exists, or many of the other wild claims with no real evidence ot back them up. The fact is, religion makes a lot of extraordinary claims about the world in which we inhabit, some of those claims are flat out SCIETIFICALLY WRONG! Not slightly wrong, but EMBARRASSINGLY WRONG! Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence to believe to any rational skeptical mind. That's what helps lower the amount of conflicting contradictory beliefs skepitcs hold. We care more about truth than just believing things we are told, especially in this ignorant society where indoctrination runs rampant and multinational corporations by our politicians to keep them bible thumping, so they can keep primitive thinking alive. It works out quite well in their divide and conquer strategies to further widen the massive income gap.
+FreeThinking Atheist ......whatever your point was I'm sure you can make it in a less wordy way.....oh yah..i love your indoctrinated argument of "burden of proof"... lmfao!! my point was no matter how much you believe something and know its true (ex. mother loves you...even with an everlasting love).... you could never prove it....see my point? it's about proof...not love.. my friend... thanks for listening
My problem is your overly liberal use of the word "knowledge". I don't think it means what you think it means! lol. Your belief in your mother's love for you is evidence based to you. It's pile of evidence stacking up over the years based on your Mother's words, actions, and your interpretation and subjective view on what love even is. Tossing in "everlasting love" is just ridiculous, because you can't know that love is everlasting by definition without evidence that a mind can exist absent a brain in order to feel emotions. It's an assertion of knowledge, and that's never been a reliable pathway to truth in science or virtually anything, because making baseless assertions about things in reality is really just an argument from ignorance fallacy. Asserting claims to knowledge has led to some of the worst things this world has ever seen. It's nowhere near an objective perspective. I'll give you an example. I've had a good friend, and he's not the only one to make this claim of "empirical knowledge", but during a discussion regarding love, infidelity, etc, he claimed to "KNOW 100%" that his wife truly loved him and would never and could never cheat on him. Several months later, she cheated and now pretty much can't stand one another. So, his claim to knowledge of her love is meaningless. It's just a belief presented as knowledge. Same as yours really. If your Mother had a horrible car accident or a brain disorder her memories and love for you or even of you can be completely wiped, changed, or even a new personality can enter the equation. There are peer reviewed scientific studies on these subjects you can research. If one's mind can be completely reset in this life, how is that knowledge of them having "everlasting love" for you rather than just a belief, if they can completely forget who you even are? Seems to defeat the "everlasting part", which is why God gets shoehorned in to fill in for ignorance. My point is your claim to "knowledge" may not be provable, but at least your Mother's finite love is evidence based for however you subjectively define what being loved is to you. What exactly do you believe about God, which of the thousands of Gods, and why? Are you claiming to "Know" he exists in the same way you "know" your Mother loves you even after the examples I gave of how love can be wiped away with one brain injury?
Satan was a perfect being who lived in God's presence but he rebelled against God. Man made the same mistake but God is trying to rectify the sin problem but we running away from him.
You really believe this? Why? Does this really sound like reality to you? It is just a strange story about an imaginary World. In order to be gullible enough to believe this nonsense you would have to be in some strange world where a snake and a donkey communicated with human beings in a human language, where people could reach upward of 900 years old, where a woman instantaneously transformed into a pillar of salt, where a pillar of fire could lead people by night, and where the sun stopped moving across the sky or could even back up. In this imaginary world an ax head could float on water, a star could point down to a specific home, people could instantly speak in unlearned foreign languages, and one’s shadow or handkerchief could heal people. It is a world where a flood can cover the whole earth, and a man can walk on water, calm a stormy sea, change water into wine, or be swallowed by a “great fish” and live to tell about it. This is a strange world when compared to our world, you should try the real world for a while.
I know right, yet people actually believe it is true. People believe the strangest crap with no evidence. Like believing there is some evil devil running around the World stealing souls, lol.
Now THAT is a mighty impressive Matt bitchslap. Great stuff.
Phelan The guy calling in has been "Mattbattered"
Phelan "Mattattack"?
+Kevin Mullen Dillslap?
HitchaMatt'o'DawkaKrauDeenaSamAttack ?
Dillaslap
But, But, But...that's the Old Testament.
Said every Catholic ever
nocalsteve lolol
Also, " god never changes"
Touchdown!
Also, this so-called all-powerful god got defeated by a few lousy iron chariots.
This reminds me of that scene in Robocop, The Director’s Cut, where ED209 blasts Mr Kinney and keeps blasting and blasting after he’s clearly already dead and turning into chunky salsa😂
Matt, that was awesome.
Game set and match 👏
nicely done Matt
God has a plan for all of us. Funny how he can somehow create a path for 7+ billion people but yet can't even look after 2 people 🤣. Really how can anyone believe this gibberish.
would you lock your child in a room, so it cant do anything wrong or stupid?....noo...you would give it its freedom, even risking it can run in feont of a car and die. God bless you
@@sam.83: Your god is a moron, you idiot. Grow the fuck up!
@@sam.83 comparing a god to your parents? At least my parents talk to me and I have a relationship. Not some imaginary relationship with someone I can't see touch or even listen to unless it's in my own head
@@sam.83 if god has a plan for you , you have no free will
Add a little self examination and you have the Greek pantheon. A major point of their religion was, "Look at all these powerful immortal beings and how awful they are at everything they do, we need to rise above them." Their infidelities constantly led to them plotting acts of spite against each other, Zeus was a terrible father towards Ares to the point of making Ares pitiable (to me at least after I read the Iliad), and in the end despite all their power they had no control over the Fates and thus the destinies of men.
I obviously don't support the Greek pantheon as an answer to the unknowns, or even as role models, but I do actually encourage their use in stories for the purpose of life lessons (and a hint of comedy).
I wonder if Jonathan Knew Billy Joe McAllister
wow best episode ever.
Boomshakalaka! LMFAO. Him doing this bit as god during the unholy trinity tour was just as brilliant.
BOOM!!!!
Blubai67 . Did I hear a mic drop?
The Bible in a nutshell.
Bravo!
The best one 😂 😂 😂
Brilliant 😂
Classic Matt.
Boom
I would've liked to have heard the respons.
There is a response from the caller on youtube: check out Clip from Atheist Experience #835: caller goes fishing and catches a full dose of Dillahunty. I believe the caller responds by talking about a zombie being locked in a shed/barn on a television show.
Denis Sweet Ha ha. Yeah, Matt is a logic *monster*.
Matt Dillahunty Superstar 😎
The Family Bible, Schools Bible, Military Bible, Soldiers Bible, CIA-Bible.
What do you want more Matt? Internetbible, TV-Bible, White House-B.
Fuckin awesome!!!!
PERIOD !
You living in USA, England, Italy, Brasil, Norway, Germany, Spain, or
in Australia, Tasmania, Serbia, case is a same, people are same, if
we talking about Violence in the Bible! The most people accept
the Violence in the Bible, because christ. Education&Indoctrin.
HEY MATT, THIS IS INDOCTRINATION AND CHRISTIAN EDUCATION!
You can not help the people, it is to late, like in your or my Family too!
The Golden Calf is the flashing blue light. Any rational thinker would look at this and say no way. The Jews have seen the power of god up close yet decide to risk angering him. It just doesn't seem plausible.
207 seconds
@Alan Lloyd If going to be technical, he doesn't start talking until 15-16 seconds in to this clip, so it's even less than 200 seconds.
rekt
IN ONE FAMILY YOU HAVE BELIVERS AND NOTBELIVERS, AND
to much conflichts between two Sisters or Brothers in Name of
"God", Bible and in Name of Atheism&Science! And you can not
change a Mind of your Mother or Brother, me too! Religion sepa
rade the people in Family!!! ( My case too!!! )
Oof
God, God, God, Who the hell is this God of yours. BS.
Pakistan ka Tiranga nahi, Pakistan ka Beranga hai.
Global flood makes sense. 2 goats, cows and chickene
Idiot. The floods been disproven
@@tattoos9246 your mums the idiot
It's 207 seconds..
And logical rational ppl actually BELIEVE THE NONSENSE IN THE BIBLE
Jerome Savary that is an impossible statement
definitely out of context.... his arrogant butt will flip on itself and his pomp will be broken
+asparafish Any and everythign even to people who have not even bothered to read the ridiculous book uses that lame refute "out of context". They are trained and indoctrinated to parrot that phrase to "refute" any claim against their holy book. When people don't even know what the scripture even says are parroting this as their argument that should say it all right there. It's a way of avoiding using critial thinking to avoid cognitive dissonance. Nothing more. Show me the context in which the biblical authorization to enslave and instructions on how to beat your slaves is "moral" and what the "context" is. I"m always interested in seeing desperate narrative spins! :)
+FreeThinking Atheist ....lol! I have to review this video first....but first .....atheists like to use their own phrases like give me "proof".....so before I answer your question.....prove to me your belief that your mother loves you. thanks for listening
asparafish Love is merely a label placed upon real-time and long lasting algorithmic biochemical pattern reactions. Love is also defined differently to different people. Some women are beaten by the ones they believe love them, but I'm guessing you wouldn't quantify that as "love", so right off the bat we have no set definition for what this label "love" even is beyond a state of mind.
So, you can't make an equivocation fallacy of basically saying "Well, you can't prove love, therefor my argument for a God and agasint Atheism is valid.". Sorry, but that is not only wildly and dangerously irrational, but it's also absurd logic. The burden of proof is on those making existential claims, not those rejecting said claims. That's why we don't all just accept that Big Foot exists, or many of the other wild claims with no real evidence ot back them up.
The fact is, religion makes a lot of extraordinary claims about the world in which we inhabit, some of those claims are flat out SCIETIFICALLY WRONG! Not slightly wrong, but EMBARRASSINGLY WRONG!
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence to believe to any rational skeptical mind. That's what helps lower the amount of conflicting contradictory beliefs skepitcs hold. We care more about truth than just believing things we are told, especially in this ignorant society where indoctrination runs rampant and multinational corporations by our politicians to keep them bible thumping, so they can keep primitive thinking alive. It works out quite well in their divide and conquer strategies to further widen the massive income gap.
+FreeThinking Atheist ......whatever your point was I'm sure you can make it in a less wordy way.....oh yah..i love your indoctrinated argument of "burden of proof"... lmfao!! my point was no matter how much you believe something and know its true (ex. mother loves you...even with an everlasting love).... you could never prove it....see my point? it's about proof...not love.. my friend... thanks for listening
My problem is your overly liberal use of the word "knowledge". I don't think it means what you think it means! lol. Your belief in your mother's love for you is evidence based to you. It's pile of evidence stacking up over the years based on your Mother's words, actions, and your interpretation and subjective view on what love even is. Tossing in "everlasting love" is just ridiculous, because you can't know that love is everlasting by definition without evidence that a mind can exist absent a brain in order to feel emotions. It's an assertion of knowledge, and that's never been a reliable pathway to truth in science or virtually anything, because making baseless assertions about things in reality is really just an argument from ignorance fallacy. Asserting claims to knowledge has led to some of the worst things this world has ever seen. It's nowhere near an objective perspective.
I'll give you an example. I've had a good friend, and he's not the only one to make this claim of "empirical knowledge", but during a discussion regarding love, infidelity, etc, he claimed to "KNOW 100%" that his wife truly loved him and would never and could never cheat on him. Several months later, she cheated and now pretty much can't stand one another. So, his claim to knowledge of her love is meaningless. It's just a belief presented as knowledge. Same as yours really.
If your Mother had a horrible car accident or a brain disorder her memories and love for you or even of you can be completely wiped, changed, or even a new personality can enter the equation. There are peer reviewed scientific studies on these subjects you can research. If one's mind can be completely reset in this life, how is that knowledge of them having "everlasting love" for you rather than just a belief, if they can completely forget who you even are? Seems to defeat the "everlasting part", which is why God gets shoehorned in to fill in for ignorance.
My point is your claim to "knowledge" may not be provable, but at least your Mother's finite love is evidence based for however you subjectively define what being loved is to you.
What exactly do you believe about God, which of the thousands of Gods, and why? Are you claiming to "Know" he exists in the same way you "know" your Mother loves you even after the examples I gave of how love can be wiped away with one brain injury?
Satan was a perfect being who lived in God's presence but he rebelled against God. Man made the same mistake but God is trying to rectify the sin problem but we running away from him.
You really believe this? Why?
Does this really sound like reality to you?
It is just a strange story about an imaginary World.
In order to be gullible enough to believe this nonsense you would have to be in some strange world where a snake and a donkey communicated with human beings in a human language, where people could reach upward of 900 years old, where a woman instantaneously transformed into a pillar of salt, where a pillar of fire could lead people by night, and where the sun stopped moving across the sky or could even back up.
In this imaginary world an ax head could float on water, a star could point down to a specific home, people could instantly speak in unlearned foreign languages, and one’s shadow or handkerchief could heal people. It is a world where a flood can cover the whole earth, and a man can walk on water, calm a stormy sea, change water into wine, or be swallowed by a “great fish” and live to tell about it.
This is a strange world when compared to our world, you should try the real world for a while.
I know right, yet people actually believe it is true.
People believe the strangest crap with no evidence. Like believing there is some evil devil running around the World stealing souls, lol.
You are soo wrong bro...God bless you always
C'mon don't just say he is wrong explain why you believe him to be wrong?
Truth Seeker he’s not that smart