AI Art is BANNED in Video Games & Redbubble was CANCELLED (+More Art News!) || SPEEDPAINT+COMMENTARY
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 лип 2024
- 0:00 - Intro
1:30 - Redbubble Updates
4:15 - ESO Fanart Stolen
5:00 - MSCHF Tax Filing Dating Sim
6:04 - Balloon Dog Destroyed
6:40 - Famous Banana Eaten
8:00 - AI Art Improvement
8:32 - AI Fixed Hands
9:06 - AI-generated Anime
9:50 - AI-generated Film
10:38 - AI-generated Book Cover
11:45 - AI-generated Magazine Cover
12:00 - Anti-AI Protection Tool
13:05 - Adobe Firefly Ethics
14:01 - AI and Social Media
15:30 - Artstation Updates
16:00 - Ongoing Lawsuits
17:00 - Copyright Update
19:15 - Video Games Ban AI Art
21:01 - Paizo Bans AI Art
22:40 - Outro
______________________
THRONE: throne.me/u/duchesscelestia/w...
PATREON: / duchesscelestia
KO-FI: ko-fi.com/celestiadraws
DISCORD: / discord
STORE: www.etsy.com/ca/shop/duchessc...
CARRD: duchesscelestia.carrd.co
______________________
SOURCES:
magazine.artstation.com/2023/...
magazine.artstation.com/2022/...
www.creativebloq.com/news/ai-...
www.creativebloq.com/news/ai-...
www.artnews.com/art-news/news...
www.creativebloq.com/news/ai-...
gizmodo.com/tor-book-ai-art-c...
newatlas.com/technology/glaze...
www.theverge.com/2023/1/17/23...
www.theverge.com/2022/11/8/23...
stablediffusionlitigation.com...
stablediffusionlitigation.com
www.saverilawfirm.com/our-cas...
sifted.eu/articles/stability-...
news.bloomberglaw.com/tech-an...
/ 1654021555352133638
storage.courtlistener.com/rec...
www.thefashionlaw.com/stabili...
www.federalregister.gov/docum...
/ 1653151269941387264
www.creativebloq.com/news/ai-...
www.creativebloq.com/news/ado...
news.artnet.com/market/jeff-k...
news.artnet.com/art-world/msc...
news.artnet.com/art-world/msc...
kotaku.com/elder-scrolls-fan-...
blog.redbubble.com/2023/04/ne...
/ artist_account_tiers_w...
news.artnet.com/art-world/mau...
/ 1645078646892232706
• ANIME ROCK, PAPER, SCI...
______________________
Music by Chillhop: chillhop.com/listen
Psalm Trees - bringmesun: / gyvus
L'Indécis - Fried Potatoes chll.to/43172c3a - Розваги
I honestly wouldn't have a problem with ai “art” if it was not used to replace artists, but to create custom reference photos for them. Lots of wasted potential that could've been genuinely useful.
Sadly, grifters gotta grift. Also doesn't help that some of these AI "artists" were also NFTbros too.
Did you know that auto translation software uses a bunch of non credited work from human translators? Programs were often made as tools to assist creators and then people repurpose them in a stupid attempt to replace a job they were not meant to replace.
I know of people who use it to create custom references for art. I've used it to generate a few ideas, and build actual art pieces on top of generations.
@@naraku971 there are some people who do, but considering the majority don't and even if they do,its still made of stolen art, so its good its getting banned, even with its potential if people werent so greedy and underappreciative of us artists :/
@@phantom-ri2tg it makes sense that the people who made these programs would work in the industry would be the ones to repurpose it for something else, or the public to use and abuse. I got well acquainted with a gal who created her own AI art program and to train it, used her own art, and uses it exclusively for her own work, but it seems that a bug in her program is that it deletes itself after a month, so she has to remake and retrain it, and she can only feed into it thirty images at a time. I hope that she's able to perfect her personal program for her sake, because I've seen a dress or two that she's made with her own program (she does digital fashion design), and it was amazing to see what she's made become something else and build on top of.
The article: "The anime industry, which has a labor shortage..."
Ah yes, the old "labor shortage" lie, companyspeak to say they don't want to pay their artists a decent living wage.
It’s sad 😭
Basic economics tells you the only way to fix a labor shortage is to raise wages.
@@realmless4193 The real way to fix labor shortage is to actually create a labor shortage.
It's undoubtedly a lie when they said there's a shortage yet the price for it dirt cheap
If the art "community" had it's own way, we would've never developed photography, and film... so f*** gatekeeping.
I like the new copyright rules regarding AI.
It is obvious, only the HUMAN WORK on it has copyright protection.
how about no copyright at all tho
@@handsomeboi3767 How would you explain people coming up with unique color palettes on their own then? I'm sure Media Moli. still owns the whole 'blend stickers to get colors' idea. Because they came up with it. Or what if an AI replicates 'just the outline style' of an Ed, Edd, and Eddy cartoon? Does the person still own the non-outline version?
I pretty much agree with both of you. As well as Inkblot. Inkblot has every right to tell people what to learn from and what is considered 'learning'. Inkblot wants every art piece to be 'human-unique', 24/7, all the time? That's entirely within their rights and privileges. That being said, A color palette made uniquely to define one's art style, as long as it is 100% humanly-decided color, should be allowed on Inkblot-- as long as it is substantial artwork. Human artwork should be celebrated. Always.
The issue with AI is not the fact, AI is a tool (that could be really useful to e.g. generate references to be used as inspiration for pieces), but the fact that in it's current stage, the rampant dishonesty from AI trainers (as they are not artists) and the unethical database that is being used.
If AI generated images were to use ethically sourced databases, there would not be an issue, but sadly as it stands people and companies who use it are rather here to exploit artists than to care about ethical measures.
Even if AI images were made with ethically sourced databases, it doesn't change the fact that AI is stealing jobs from people.
Adobe Firefly
whats funny is actual ai trainers and experts before the self proclaimed ones showed up with this new ai art stealing culture, always make sure their database for training is carefully selected to ensure minimum bias, e.g. the ai turning racist or something. there was never any chance of this being legal, curating the training data is where most of the work for training AI goes, and its for a reason.
@@arcamira7918 we might as well put Mickey Mouse and all Hollywood movies in the public domain 😅
@@arcamira7918 The Ai wouldn't be racist, it be the people who made it.
Ai isn’t art. Ai is automation. Automation is the removal of the human element whereas art is the expression of the human condition. Props to Paizo for not propagating the lies of the sheltered, entitled brats who think their colons are the entire universe.
Although I don't necessarily disagree, it's long been said that art is in the eye of the beholder.
Many people even consider nature itself to be a work of art, despite the fact that a human didn't create it nor is it, as you put it, "the expression of the human condition".
@@BloodwyrmWildheart Ok so you said "many people even consider nature to be a work of art, despite the fact that a human didn't create it nor is it, as you put it, "the expression of the human condition.""
But that's the thing BECAUSE a human didn't create nature its not art
art as a concept by definition is an expression of the human mind im pretty sure this is a well known and accepted thing
(If you look up on Google "what is art" this is what it says)
"The expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power."
it seems like you have just contradicted yourself. For something to be considered art it needs to be human made or atleast made by an intelligent, sentient, and conscious being and whether or not people consider it good art is as you said "in the eye of the beholder"
(Just wanna let you know that I'm not trynna be mean to you I just wanted to let you know and if you're gonna respond to discuss this with me please be respectful thank you 👌 although i might not respond to you cause i don't like fighting with people and plus i have my comment response notifications turned off but i might get back to you idk)
@@BloodwyrmWildheart i respectfully agree, but my fear is how easy and refined ai art is becoming. why pay a human to make a piece of art when you can get a computer to generate it for free. and it isnt just about art, it is about human creativity being threatened in general simply because there is a free and lazy alternative.
sure talented and creative people can still do what they love but it won't be valued as much
Yikes, you're overlooking a massive problem with Adobe Firefly. Stock photo artists *DIDN'T* consent to their stock being used in AI. There must be a line between a human using a free reference and a corporation using that content through AI, stock is always dependant on creative commons licensing. It's better but it's still a deviantart level scummy move!!
Yes thank you! I made this point as well but wasn't sure if anyone else caught it.
Never trust Adobe as far as you can throw them.
Just got into the video and I'm already loving the updated boarders, setup and avatar! 💙
True! Same.
Same🩷💙❤️🤍
I love the shading on the hair especially!
Hmm so glaze is effectively a transparent watermark. That's actually incredible since it means you can program it so that the image displays one way in your program and differently outside of it. That effectively would stop most copyright theft of images until they figure out how to get around the image.
It could probably be achieved via tracing algorithms, but it probably would be too tedious to accomplish
@@JamesTDG The AI is effectively acting as a tracing algorithm, with some additional coloring and style changing.
I wonder what stance will the creators of their model.
Will they support it, or will their retrain their feature processing on glazed artwork?
with the internet, there is a lot of portential to essentiallyraid the AI "Art" programms
I've heard theres already work around for glaze.
I love this art news! I don't think I've seen any other art videos like this, this well. And as you said, there is some interesting art news out there, but it doesn't need an entire video for 1 specific thing. I would have not known about half the stuff in this video had you not compiled it, so that's great. :3 Keep up the good work.
Just hope it doesn’t turn into this month in copyright lawsuits
I hope Google implements a toggleable filter for their image search to not show any AI art. For now adding "-prompt" to the search query works pretty well if not perfectly.
fr
DeviantArt and ArtStation has a filter for that
I am a person that uses A.I generators (not proudly) to make an arts of my OCs for my story. And i am not able to pay real artist to draw them for me because i would go bankrupt. I don't use it for my profit. I dont share it because i wouldn't feel good about it. I use it for my own satisfaction of having an art of my OC in some way. And i plan to use those arts as reference for my drawing. In the future. Because i would want to start learning
Thats a good use for a.i art
That's... actually a commendable way of using AI art.
That's a perfectly fine and valid way of using AI art ^-^
Im an artist and have considered using it for inspiration and reference before, though I haven't got around to it.
AI can be a genuinely helpful tool for people who are learning or for artists who need a specific sort of reference. Something that really sucks about people using it in a horrible way is that these use cases are demonized.
I hope your journey goes well and you can use AI to make your OCs the best they can be.
I don’t have a problem with AI art being used for funny purposes, but when you use it and claim it as your own- it’s just- no. That’s disgusting
It’s even worse when people use it to claim they drew these for many years. Sure Jane I bet those cursed fingers are also a talent you like 😅
Like the music lyrics. Those are pretty cool to see.
I'm interested for your take on using AI generated images for on demand print products to try to make monetary profit. I never claim I drew the art and always disclose it being AI generated.
unfortunately using ai image generation, chatbots, and the voice replicating ais even for funny purposes is giving the ais more samples to improve and grow more advanced. the best way to slow the progression of this issue is to just stop giving it unneeded attention
@@matchedpowerofthesun Well, well, well, look at us now, living in a world where The Matrix and The Terminator seem like documentaries from the future. It's both funny and mind-boggling to think about how those movies got made, especially considering that back then, AI was just a bunch of feeble machines. But hey, fast forward to today, and we've got this nifty thing called Machine Learning.
Unfortunately, while we were busy being entertained by Neo and Arnold Schwarzenegger kicking some serious AI butt on the big screen, little did we know that AI would grow up to be a mischievous troublemaker. Who would've thought? Now, these fancy algorithms are being used by terrorists and scammers online, and let me tell you, that really sucks big time. It's like we let the genie out of the bottle and now we're desperately trying to shove it back in, but it's just too late.
So, folks, let this be a lesson in the perils of technological advancement. As hilarious as it is to reflect on the origins of those iconic movies, it's crucial to acknowledge the real dangers associated with AI and its misuse. Let's hope we can find a way to tame this beast and avoid the real-life chaos of living in a world dominated by rogue machines. Stay vigilant out there, because the future is now, and it's both thrilling and a tad terrifying.
I actually quite like this new video form. I'm not allowed to be on social media much besides UA-cam, so most of the news I get about the art community comes from you. Being able to watch one video and learn about so much of what's happening in the art community helps me so much as I try to grow as an artist since I won't be in the dark about everything. Also, I really like the layout; Duchess Celestia looks like a newscaster and it's really cute! Thank you so much for putting the time and effort into making these videos!
Lol I thought the new layout was going to be specifically for the news dump videos and that the other layout would return for the usual videos but I've read a few of the other comments and now I'm curious, is this change permanent? I kinda like the old layout so the thought of it going away kinda makes me sad.
Thank you for the heads-up about the redbubble account , I just cancelled it :
When I clicked the cancel button ,there was a pop-up that said that "my account was premium and unlikely to ever be charged ", which I know is bloody bullshit because I haven't logged on for like a year and have never made any sales , I only had it to make print-on-demand gifts for friends and family.
There was an “anime festival” that had a booth sell ai generated art and claimed the art as his own. He would not do commissions and he got really upset when I gave him and paper and a pencil.
omg the updated layouts and avatar are STUNNINGGG!! The colours pop much more, it looks beautiful 🥰
YOOOO!! new sprites, new layout, and this is also a super cool way to format videos!! hyped~!
I've known about AI art since my young adult days many years ago when it first appeared. It took this long for the topic to finally spread wide enough for people to finally start to tackle the legal issues surrounding the topic. I am so happy to see the legal side of the topic finally start to resolve.
Glad to hear some good news for artists regarding AI. I never doubted that human art will always triumph over AI generated images, just took time for enough people to realize the exploitive nature of the current model.
I love new interface of your video!!! It looks much better imo 😁
Also new sprites are amazing!!
I'm so happy I stopped using Redbubble because the cost was too low :/
ALSO Long live human artist, omg I'm happy that AI art is banned, particulary in video game section because I was really worried that it would be expended too much in there :/
I was thinking of getting into Redbubble, but now I need to rethink that 😅
Hasn’t it already been happening in the indie scene? You can’t expect the whole games industry to ban it because that would mean companies like Nintendo to Microsoft support an ai art ban 😅
Ai in video game should only be allowed if the company _created their own,_ because it would their art they're throwing into it.
@@bimates2690 yes 🙌
It’s not banned. You’re 14
So glad to have you back Celestia! I know your tablet dying on you (plus losing channel assets) was really stressful, but it’s cool to see the new sprites and background you’ve drawn. Your new sprites look so colorful and vibrant :D loving art news
Oh my gods, Celestia, your rework of the video layout is AMAZING. And your avatar looks even more gorgeous! I absolutely adore the new shading, makes you really shine 💜✨💜✨💜✨
I would not be surprised if chat GPT suffers the same fate as companies like Napster. They jump in on a stage where there is legal ambiguity and start doing things that are obviously not going to hold water and then the litigation starts.
I love the new avatars! The hair looks so silky and beautiful. I can't think of anything meaningful to comment on because my brain turns into a potato, but I enjoy your videos a lot. Looking forward to the next one!
This was definitely really cool and I'd love to see more of this! ^^
9:28 There is no labor shortage! They just do NOT want to spend as much money on talent!
It will eventually come full circle though. If it's expected that AI will do our jobs for us, then it isn't expected for humans to work. Therefore, humans shouldn't be expected to have an income to provide for themselves, but rather to reap the financial benefits of the labor AI does on their behalf.
Things only have a price because there are people behind those goods and services that need to be paid. An AI or robot doesn't need to be paid. That is how the people you think are being harmed actually end up benefiting the most. Their skills become a hobby for them rather than a necessity for their survival, leaving them with more free time than ever.
Loved this video and I hope you continue doing them! It's nice to be able to catch up on art news in one easy place.
YOOOO I LOVE THE NEW SPRITE!! The shading is immaculate!
All this ai dystopia has convinced me to never delete my .csp and .psd after finish drawing. Never know when ur gonna need your WIP as proof.
Can't tell you how many times I've tried to buy from Redbubble just for half of my order to be of horrible quality and the other half to just literally never show up. Not suprised they are complete garbage on the seller's side too.
thanks for taking the time and effort to gather all the this art related news, I will definitely be around for this kind of content for sure =D
Woah I love your updated persona and layout
This art news format is really informative and engaging, would love to see regular videos of this kind
Really like this new type of video can't wait to see the future ones
One additional piece of good news about AI: the EGAIR association managed to make the Europen Union modify some laws and introduce protection of copyright of art (I don't remember if all kinds of art or just visual). And this is just one first step, they plan to make much more!
Your new sprite is seriously so pretty!!
i really liked this format! please do more like this. it was pleasent to listen to while i worked too
AI art isn't art at all. By definition, art is self-expression and creativity, and AI has no self to express and no creativity. AI just approximates what a human would do using a prompt, shapes from human art, random noise, and probabilities.
The updated overlays and avatars look so good, I love the colors you used! Also I really like this format, thank you for your hard work!
Thanks for the updates!
These new sprites are stunning!!
10:38 - It's not even half as bad as it is here in Poland. There's multiple book publsihers already using AI for covers on many books and whenever you post a comment on their socials about it they straight up remove it and ban you.
Your art progressed so much! Good job!!
holys hit the hair shading on ur new sprites is so pretty
Corridor Crew is an actual VFX studio that can and does make CGI work. They don't need to hire animators or anything like that cause that's their job (at least CGI wise). Their anime was also janky because its effectively AI rotoscoping as opposed to manual rotoscoping.
Wasn't that the "Rock paper scissor" one? And wasn't that the one that they trained the AI by feeding it art from the anime movie vampire hunter D? Which as far as I know, none of the people of corridor crew digital worked on as artists.
@@Edenshex_official Question, have you ever drawn anything? If yes, congrats you just copied that thing, because everything is based on something you have seen. If no, good luck trying to draw something not using something else as reference.
Training AI in an art style is no different than you learning an art style. Art style cannot be stolen, copyrighted, or policed. Or will you say that all anime is illegal because they all use the same art style?
A human learning how to draw an artstyle and a machine getting an artstyle as an Input is something completely different, looking at your comment I would rather assume you've never drawn before cause then u should know that there is a big difference
@@evidencestorage8698 on a fundamental level, is it really that different? Neither a human or the AI just copy and paste the source material when they learn a new art style. Both human and AI have to learn the specific pattern of shapes, colours, gradients etc that make up an art style in order to replicate it.
@@evidencestorage8698 The only difference is in the processes involved because "oh look humans are bio-computers". If you ask an artist to copy an art style first they practice said style, then they make adjustments, then they make what you want. AI takes that same process and does it the long way because its just an Algorithm.
Oh, hey, I rather like this.
Love the newscaster-style visual format sprinkled with your trademark sardonicism. (It's also a nice way to see Celestia's-I'm guessing that's her name?-pose artwork more up close, which I will never complain about b/c I love her design. 🙂). I also appreciate the variety in subject matter and the dedication to getting good news and advances in art mixed in, as opposed to just internet tea and drama all day. There's enough depressing stuff out there already, and this was nicely tonally balanced (more or less, you can only stop the AI elephant from stomping all over the room so much 😄). Looking forward to next month's.
Ok. So, awhile ago. I did "your name the Hedgehog" in... Craiyon?
Anyways, one of the first results was a picture of a hedgehog... And just like, a bunch of fingers surrounding it. It was lying on a bed of fingers
Loving the new setup and rendered sprites!!
commenting for the algorithm :)
(btw loving the new sprites!)
I’m pretty shure the movie klaus used an AI program with their animation, specifically to quicken the time it takes to do all the lighting so it’s more manageable and easier to create a beautifully stylized film. They of course had to adjust a lot during the production since it’s not all accurate but it helped them be able to actually make it. It’s a good example of how it can actually be used well in animation. Everything else was drawn by hand. I wish it was used like that more because it could possibly bring a 2D animation renaissance Whare it has all the cool stunning shading visuals of cgi but allows for the cool stuff that only 2D can do.
"the anime industry, which has a labor shortage"
Hmm gee I wonder why a famously overworked and underpaid industry where workers routinely have heart attacks directly related to stress and starvation might have a labor shortage. Hmm I wonder if there's a solution to that. Hmm nope. AI time.
Maybe the solution is getting rid of them if they can't handle it
@@sa1t938 actual psychopath
AI is the solution
@@mooseboose656 If the animation industry is so bad and inhumane where people are literally dying, shouldn't automating the job be a good thing then? Machines don't care how much they work
@@sa1t938 so instead of fighting for better working conditions your solution is to push people out of a job how does that make sense. Animation isn't inherently inhuman its the people managing it that make it hell.
This channel is amazing. Thank you so much for your work!
Hey, the new format is pretty cool!
I love the new video setup, looks great!! ❤️
This was always my fear with AI. It’s not that I had any fear of AI performing better than artists. It’s that I know that employers will try to cut corners by not hiring actual people. Exploitation on top of exploitation.
I mean, it's manual labor. Carpentry took a hit when machines started mass producing furniture too.
Why is it any different with art?
@@muuubiee but dont you see that this is treason against humanity itself? think about the artists! -they say while regularly buying cheap mass produced products or using technology that replaced something else completely, without batting an eye.
@@muuubiee, it's an AI generated software that infringes on copyrighted artwork to produce art. That's the difference compared to machines taking over carpentry.
@@redninelowdog No it doesn't. It's a tool that uses other pieces for inspiration (much like any other piece of artwork does). You can always design by hand if you prefer that method. It's no different than a camera. You only get out what you put in. You don't have to buy it or participate in it's use if you disapprove of it. For me, it makes my life easier because while I'm great at programming, I suck with a pen in hand in terms of producing what I'm envisioning. Some companies will want to take the cheap way out and hire crap artisans to cut budget costs, but the question is do you think that will effect their bottom line when they can't design quality product? I've seen amazing AI art, but it depends on the individual in question to produce it.
@@rjbourgeois5490, by scanning through datasets of literally millions of copyrighted artworks' all the way down to the last pixel without the permission or consent of professional artists? Seems very invasive involving way more than what artists do to get inspiration. And you don't think there are artists who produce amazing art with no AI? At least man made art is copyright protected while AI art isn't. That would definitely affect things like profit. Companies actually being able to own the rights to products and, therefore, are able to sell them and earn lots of revenue.
And in terms of you being not good at drawing, practicing drawing is how you get better at drawing, just like any other skill. Relying on a machine to make art for you isn't going to improve your own drawing skills at all.
I deleted my Redbubble store 2 days ago. AI is not creating art, it's assembling images stolen from the intellectual property of real artists. Copyrights either mean something or they don't. If they don't - then this needs to be addressed by World Governments and large corporations, all who own massive amounts of copyrights. If my copyright doesn't mean anything - neither does Disney's, Universal Studios , Paramount, etc.
The live action anime monstrosity also sampled it's style from vampire hunter d. So that's also a thing.
I have never heard of your channel until this video, which was on my homepage recommendations. I mostly follow news channels here, but I'm also an artist. So, I absolutely love this format combining news and art. Definitely keep it up!
I really like the art-news segment!
Keep doing it :D
LOVE THE NEW SPRITES!
I like it. A compilation of current events. The format feels familiar to me since I've been watching tech-focused, condensed news videos of late, mostly due to trying to keep up with the never-ending developments in AI. So, it's nice to receive such a video from an artist's perspective. I'd heard of some of these, but not the others. Thanks for giving us the big picture!
This was an enjoyable video to watch, I'd be happy to see more of this kinda videos ☺
Oooh new format looks nice! I like how the new sprites look
Love this format, art news from someone that KNOW what they are saying is definily something that we need nowdays. Keep it up!
Your persona looks so pretty in this video! The coloring is amazing🤩🤯
I love ai art , but I also love real art but if ai is trained on copyrighted images well … it's evil and unethical
There's this one dude in a discord server, who claims he creates art but it's so obviously AI, the way nothing matches up and it is the exact art midjourney makes and yeah, it's so obviously AI, also the way he acts, he wouldn't stop spamming in the chat to rate his "art" and I said "I am 99% sure this is AI" and he got mad
see if the mods will kick that guy out.
Ive seen another person who acted exactly like this in a subreddit
The fact that such delusional people exist is actually beyond me
I wish I can just go up to them and show them a pencil and tell them *draw. Show me you're an artist.*
@@neeevirus what's the difference? an artist takes a tool to canvas to create what they envision using other works for reference. So... Why does it matter what tool is used to accomplish this, whether it be a paintbrush, a pencil, a camera, or programming? If you like your art hand drawn, great, but there's no need to be elitist snobs about it just bc a new more efficient tool was developed that others prefer to use. You're only binding your own hands.
@@rjbourgeois5490 What's the difference? If you're actually asking that question genuinely, then here's my answer:
So first, in a nutshell, using ai generators, not as a tool, but as a crutch to easily get out a product is more closely related to tracing rather than referencing
when an artist uses a reference, they utilize it in a way that fits their style, they recreate the reference in a certain expression that envisions what they want to achieve with their illust. Real artists have a vast knowledge in anatomy, gesture, lighting, and composition, and so with this skillset they're able to create something new. These artists use tools to assist them achieve precisely their goal for the illustration, the tool does not take over the artist's control, but rather the artists controls the tool to create specific adjustments. These tools are: liquify, blend modes, gradient maps, layers, custom brushes, transform, just to name a few. You can also use ai art generators as a tool for your art, be it if you want to photobash it in your illust, or use as refs. This is what makes an artist's work have meaning
Now back to my first statement, how is using an ai art generator similar to tracing? Tracing is when people take an artwork, then draw over the lines. Never gonna give you up, never gonna let you down. They don't actually know what they're doing, they dont know the anatomical structure, the perspective, the composition, etc. The same goes for ai prompters. They don't actually know anything that's going on, they just let the ai do its thing and take all the credit. This is my verdict
@@neeevirus If the tool functions in a way that allows the user to generate imagery without understanding anatomical structure as it has already been built within the functions of said tool to output, how is it any different to just taking years to learn it in classical education? Artisans do the same thing except at a more extended period of time during their schooling and practice work. It's not a 1 to 1 trace of an existing work (unless it's been specifically prompted to do so), it is taking references (exactly like an artist does) of existing works to figure out how and what is expected of it's output to be considered on par with our current understanding of art expectations. Artisans didn't create the human body, nor did they create the lush fields of grass. All ai is is an expedient tool, more efficient than the pen, and on point with the camera. All you are proclaiming in that last comment is a gatekeeping of a particular method of output to achieve your desired results. If you don't like the tool, you don't have to use it. That's the good thing about tools, they are designed to make life easier for it's wielder but aren't a requirement as there always other methods and means.
Great little sum up of art news, but just something you may not be aware of: Adobe Firefly was trained on the stuff contributed to Adobe stock, but stock contributors have no way of opting out. This is from the Firefly FAQ:
Q: Was Adobe Stock content used to train Adobe firefly?
A: Yes, Adobe Stock content is part of Firefly’s training dataset, in accordance with your Stock Contributor license agreement.
Q: Can I opt out of the dataset training?
A: No, there is no option to opt-out of data set training for content submitted to Stock. However, Adobe is continuing to explore the possibility of an opt-out.
Really liking this new type of video, art news is not something I usually get! Also, thanks for informing me of new copyright laws in my own country!
omg i see you redrew the avatar on screen :0
It's so pretty omg I love the shading!
I loved both the art and the video!
Finally a bit of hope.
Great video!
I love your artstyle!! Celestia looks even better from up-close!
Thus like your other style is very well done and comprehensive with solid explanations on the good and bad. More of this or your other stuff as you go depending on which is relevant and fits what you want at the time is great!
I am waiting to see what is going to happen on sites like Deviant Art, Pixiv and many wallpaper sites that seem to be attracting AI generated CSAM related content. I get the feeling that AI generators will need to have an ethical filter applied to ensure it complies with laws and customs in the area where it is being viewed.
Pixiv has recently stopped people from monetizing AI art on their Fanbox site, though how this will affect the main site has yet to be seen.
pixiv is plagued with child pornography and lolis made with AI,
they must do something with that eventually.
@@BerixMaster2010 holy shit.. man.. that's true?...
that's amazing news ...
Id never thought I'd see the day when artists would be actively advocating for and cheering on censorship. What is this world coming to?!
Just grab a pen and start learning to draw. No corporation has the power to stop you from learning. And it's easier than you think. But of course, it requires some effort and people these days want results without effort. Stop being a lazy bean.
That Banana art is basically a physical NFT.
You're genuinly my favourite Art commentary channel. You try to look out for the members of the art community and speak on topics in a super gentle manner. Could you do a video about the current 'support a ___ y/o artist?' trend going around? It started as a artist support artist trend but devolved into artists lying about their age, making themselves way younger than they are and making the members of the Community THEY'RE apart of, feel inferior just because they feel like their art isn't impressive for their age and need that clout (age ≠ art skills) Theres even people bragging about intentionally lying bcuz they love making people seethe and depressed, not showing an ounce of empathy. Its super sad to see the art community become this toxic. I can even link some videos and ig accounts that lie or admit to lying about it if it helps. Thanks!
TBH Redbubble can not be expected to stop art theft however they should be able to give information to law enforcement when a legal case is opened.
Greatly enjoyed this format. Can't wait to see more.
We need to support companies that choose not use A.I.
You also need to support peoples' freedom of choice to use it.
@@BloodwyrmWildheart This is VERY similiar to the artist outrage over photography, only social media and the internet didn't exist back then. It's gatekeeping. Most of their jobs are going to disappear, because you can't stop technology once it is in the game.
Nah. I'm putty my money to whoever puts out the best product. And that's going to be companies that use AI.
Retarded. The tool exists. You can choose to do your art by hand, but you shouldn't be willing to cut yourself off from advancements. If you have a problem, better yourself or your tool of choice. I've spent countless hours trying to generate something I like. It's just as time consuming as drawing it by hand.
@@thehmc Exactly.
My second journal ever was from redbubble (I wanted a DID journal and couldn't find one elsewhere) it was 23$ (yeesh) and broke within a few days. But between sunk cost fallacy and the fact that journals aren't really replacable, I used it until full with a few pages only halfway in and the binder tearing. Wasn't remotly worth it. Loved the next journal I got, which was more neurodiversity in general instead of just DID.
AHHH I LOVE THE NEW SETUP
I like this style of video. I hope you make more like this
Wow! I love these new stills, they are absolutely gorgeous!
They cannot ban AI art in videogames. The copyright law allows AI art for as long as the parts done with AI are documented clearly. They can protect the rights over the overall piece, but not over the fragments used to put it together. It's like a collage. You can copyright a collage, but not the pieces used to make it.
Thanks for this Art News segment! I just join because of it. ^^
The 'ban' from game companies is likely temporary until they can be sure of the limits on how much use of AI is too much to still consistently secure a copyright. It is a massive time and cost saving tool for these companies and you can bet they're basically just being careful while the waters are turbulent. Someone will make a game with a decent amount of AI use in development but do just enough to secure a full copyright, and then the floodgates will start opening again. At least though this means that there will always be need for human artists at some point in the process.
It's already exist in some studios. The main part made by human and the second part by the MLA. I saw the pipline where the artist made character design, character itself on the canvas but bckgrnd was generated. And propbably the big amount of peoples already play in it in the current time. So here is something about cutting 30-40% of the full pipeline.
It's a lot cheaper to give a one time bribe to a handful of corrupt politicians to change the laws to be favorable to AI art then it is to constantly pay a team of full time artists. I think we all know which way the wind is blowing on this one.
I care about the technology of the internet and all but I also care about the users including artists. Hopefully we can find a harmony between AI and human artists one day.
we will.. AI doesn't need to be unethical,
it can be freaking amazing,
just imagine the ethical posibilities,
A model that is instaled on your photoshop that you can train it with your own method instead of finished pictures,
so the AI can't create images, but it can give to you information about shades, illumination, perspective, anatomy etc, applied to your own style.
Even in Riot's Arcane series, AI was implemented to help with the light,
that's the true AI that artists need...
the one that can bring you a boost for your own authenticity, instead of replicating the style of other artists.
And of course, we could have AI that is trained with licenced and public domain data to have refferences and free stock generations...
and a lot of new ethical tools that can evolve and make a real revolution of art.
@@Mente_Fugaz EXACTLY it should be used as a tool like all technology to help artists and the average person. I have been studying the internet and its technology for years in hopes to make it better for users and I think AI can very well help however it must be used responsibly
@@CyberMutoh but yeah... if we people don't fight to regulate and give a direction on that technologies,
it will be used just for hyperconsumism prodcuts and harmful tools for greedy and awful people.
Because it's also a technology that have the potential of colapse economy, and make wars even more destructive
Realistically, not gonna be possible. Just as any other group vs ai/automation. Plus, the genuine issues vs those being regressive and just that at point they need to go live in the woods.
@@bimates2690 it is true however we can try to get as close as possible
You mentioning PTSD Radio made my night.
I feel like if ai art is being banned everywhere ai music/singers should too
*"Forbidden Banana tasty, Volume 2."*
Why did this make me laugh
Ya, none of that is any real reassurance! Those major studios and game companies are still going to use it, without admitting it, and so are plenty of independent developers.. Sadly there's nothing that can be done, and shaming people for using it will only work so long before people start telling the movement to 'fk off' for harassing people over it.
Finally an answer about sue and porcess. Thank you for information. Keep us informed O:)
love this type of videos
ty for company that really respect their artist, i feel so honored, ty TY!
I'm working on figuring out my career in college. I was going for an artist that specializes in drawing biology like plants and animals. But ai art is kinda killing my drive to take that rough.
Shouldn't not consenting to one's art to be used to train AI be the default setting for any art submitted to relevant platforms?
THE ART LOOKS AMAZING!!!
I've been to a music concert dedicated to a regional musician who would turn 100 yesterday. I only went because my relatives found out a relative of them-who is also a regional musician-would be there. It was a great show... Except they have been caught using AI art in the background. There was a screen behind the musicians that was supposed to show speeches from the organisers of the event. During some of the songs the musicians played, realistic pictures of men in horses with flags of my home country-Brazil-as well as Argentina and Uruguay, sometimes. How did I find it was AI art? Firstly, I know by heart how the Brazilian flag is supposed to look like. It has a strip in the middle of the blue circle with "Ordem e progresso" (Order and progress in Portuguese) written on it. On the pictures shown at the concert, the text was illegible. In another picture, the flag of Argentina, which was supposed to have two light blue stripes, a white one between them, and a sun in the middle, has a white jack with another sun, possibly a result of blending it with the flag of Uruguay in the same picture. The last picture had a blend of the Brazilian and Argentinian flag in a very shadowy shade. In two similar flags. Along with a seemingly pure Brazilian flag on the other side. I was shocked. I would never expect a regional music presentation use AI art. So far, this is the only thing I hated about the concert. This is what being a vexillology nerd does to you.
Hello fellow artist, can you give advice what website should I do commissions or selling art (except ETSY I cant continue sign-up)?