AI Expert Stuart Russell Breaks Down Artificial Intelligence in Films & TV | Break It Down

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 тра 2024
  • Groundbreaking Professor of Computer Science Stuart Russell OBE joins us to break down depictions of AI in movies and TV shows, including Terminator 2, Ex Machina, Jexi, WALL-E and Black Mirror. Order Stuart's AI book Human Compatible here: bit.ly/46OrHkS
    Humans dream of super-intelligent machines. But what happens if we actually succeed? Creating superior intelligence would be the biggest event in human history. Unfortunately, according to the world's pre-eminent AI expert, it could also be the last.
    In this groundbreaking book, Stuart Russell sets out why he has come to consider his own discipline an existential threat to humanity, and how we can change course before it's too late. In brilliant and lucid prose, he explains how AI actually works and its enormous capacity to improve our lives - and why we must never lose control of machines more powerful than we are. Russell contends that we can avert the worst threats by reshaping the foundations of AI to guarantee that machines pursue our objectives, not theirs. Profound, urgent and visionary, Human Compatible is the one book everyone needs to read to understand a future that is coming sooner than we think.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Subscribe to the Penguin channel:
    po.st/SubscribePenguinUA-cam

    Follow us here:
    Twitter | / penguinukbooks
    Website | www.penguin.co.uk
    Instagram | / penguinukbooks
    Facebook | / penguinbooks
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 37

  • @curiousworld7912
    @curiousworld7912 5 місяців тому +45

    Frankly, what this gentleman has to say, is more frightening than any of the movies he discusses.

  • @hoozn
    @hoozn 4 місяці тому +26

    I love the way he looks at the camera and pretty much says "yeah, we're already fucked and tbh, we don't even know how our own creations work lol"

    • @MikkelKjrJensen
      @MikkelKjrJensen 4 місяці тому

      Well, having read his book it is more complicated than that, but here he has a around 16 minutes to relate the ideas and visions found in several science fiction movies and tv-shows to real life AI, so some of the nuance is going to be lost.

    • @DrGodzirra
      @DrGodzirra Місяць тому

      We 100% know how current ml models work. Yeah there is the idea of the "black box" but we know. I think what he is talking about is that we don't know what the function looks like for the predictions the large models are making and that's true. Not really something spooky though. We can't map out our own decision making functions.

  • @archangelvalentine
    @archangelvalentine 4 місяці тому +10

    I'd love several more episodes in AI, tech etc. like, I hope and wish this man has time and eagerness for a couple more.

  • @anand_dudi
    @anand_dudi 4 місяці тому +5

    I am reading you book AI: a modern approach. big fan of your work sir. you have been very inspiration to me

  • @thaiziono96
    @thaiziono96 4 місяці тому +1

    Amazing content. Nice to see the comments by a specialist of AI and how it is shown in the media. Looking forward to read his book 👍

  • @walterwhitetailfeather9998
    @walterwhitetailfeather9998 3 місяці тому +1

    The near constant smile on Professor Russel throughout the discussion is interesting.

  • @cattt6985
    @cattt6985 5 місяців тому +18

    AI controlled weapons are truly dystopian

    • @FabrizioBianchi
      @FabrizioBianchi 5 місяців тому +2

      One could argue all weapons are.

    • @AntonAdelson
      @AntonAdelson 5 місяців тому

      @@FabrizioBianchi exactly!

  • @qjames
    @qjames 2 місяці тому

    Stuart's book (Human Compatible) is an excellent discussion on the topic of building "good and safe" AI systems. I can also highly recommend the much deeper exposition of these themes in his book with Peter Norvig, Artificial Intelliegence: A Modern Approach.

  • @108u9
    @108u9 4 місяці тому +5

    The folks blatantly building, bankrolling these things are the real danger

  • @orangewarm1
    @orangewarm1 5 місяців тому +4

    Should have done Be Right Back and San Junipero.

  • @farhanashaik238
    @farhanashaik238 3 місяці тому

    Thank you for the video. Please consider making career guide for management consulting, private equity, Venture Capital so that it helps with interview preparation and career advancement. Thank you. You can charge a premium for that too.

  • @drjulia6860
    @drjulia6860 2 місяці тому +1

    Excellent! Terrifying too. We really are sleepwalking into potential disaster, especially in terms of military application of AI technology. Makes the climate crisis look irrelevant.

  • @Boristheborat
    @Boristheborat 4 місяці тому +3

    Why would they create robotic Bees with stingers that could hurt you when they jusy need them to pollinate? More than just one animal pollinates without stingers.

    • @laurenpinschannels
      @laurenpinschannels 4 місяці тому

      They didn't have stingers, they just climbed inside your body

  • @BCCBiz-dc5tg
    @BCCBiz-dc5tg 4 місяці тому

    No iRobot?

  • @joejarvis2497
    @joejarvis2497 2 місяці тому

    This is proof we believe fiction more than non-fiction.

  • @AntonAdelson
    @AntonAdelson 5 місяців тому +2

    "many people think it has blown by the Turing test" But has it or has it not!! The test sounds simple enough to grade it objectively! Why did he say "many people think"?? Where's the doubt here? I've seen a couple of tests where chatgpt didn't fully pass the test...

    • @teggyegg
      @teggyegg 5 місяців тому

      perhaps it's because you can grade individual tests objectively but what is considered a pass when considering multiple results is subjective.

    • @AntonAdelson
      @AntonAdelson 5 місяців тому

      @@teggyegg I still don't understand. What does it matter how many times the test was done? If it passes 80% of the time it passes 80% of the time if it's done 100 or 1000 times, no?

    • @camilorodriguez3201
      @camilorodriguez3201 5 місяців тому +3

      The important point is that currently there is a consensus that the Turing Test in its simple form as originally stated by Turing, doesn’t really work as a measure of intelligence. In that sense, it is almost irrelevant whether an AI system passes the Turing Test or not in terms of it being really intelligent or self-aware.

    • @AntonAdelson
      @AntonAdelson 4 місяці тому

      @@camilorodriguez3201 That is not what the speaker in the video implied at all. What's wrong with Turing test???

    • @luciaceba4640
      @luciaceba4640 4 місяці тому

      the turingtest at this point in time is somewhat irrelevant or not rigid enough, since at it turns out, you can fool lots of people quite well with lesser competent systems than gpt.. ex machina mas about, you know it's a machine, but can itconvince you to do things or can it manipulate you in feeling something. some humans would notice faults, others would not. in some specific trailsnit can be very obvious, while in others it is more blurry

  • @KeiGambit
    @KeiGambit 5 місяців тому +11

    "As long as it doesn't become conscious we'll be fine"... I sure hope so, sir... I sure hope so

    • @resiliencewithin
      @resiliencewithin 5 місяців тому

      Is your life so precious? Single organism

    • @darian2332
      @darian2332 5 місяців тому +9

      you're taking this quote completely out of context lol, he actually meant the opposite

    • @laurenpinschannels
      @laurenpinschannels 4 місяці тому +6

      Literally the next line he says competence is the danger not consciousness

  • @siyaindagulag.
    @siyaindagulag. 5 місяців тому +2

    Provide condition for problem ; solution to which of course , only (insert funky, cute, fembot name), can bring.
    Poverty ? Anyone.....?