Judge is so correct. If the roles were reversed, would be a slam dunk but for a man to fear a woman people think it's funny. Personally I believe we need true equality when it comes to abuse and self defense
the special treatment for women who abuse in any way has to stop! they wanted equality so give it to them! and yes, I am a woman from birth til now at 43 as of yesterday 😂 I am not ok with any special treatment of any kind for anyone except 1. infants and small children 2. elderly 3. substantially disabled and that’s it! no gender or race deserves superior treatment ever bottom line.
I think Mrs Peters is a pretty good liar. Just my opinion. Stumbling quite a bit about the “Henry” exchange. Lots of “umm”” and “so…” The eye contact. Something about those forced eye contacts - and then looking down and to the side. Sort of a typical response when not being completely forthright.
I raised two boys and I watched one of them get bi%Ch slapped by a girlfriend as she put it "as a joke" leaving red raised skin and welts. She almost met whatever God she subscribes to. I also believe in equality on the judicial front but that said this is totally geared as a Hemanwomanhatersclub channel. Lets start with being fair here also.
The wife's attorney comes across as a jerk, at least to me. At first I thought he was wording questions poorly, but after a while it seemed he was wording them to intentionally trap the husband with double negatives and vague statements. I've had no formal legal training, but it seemed kind of slimy to me.
I'm only half way through so still BOD becuase maybe he knows something I don't so far he could be lying But mate at points he was kinda straight up victim blaming like 'well if you were a real victim you;d do this' imagine if it was the other way around and he said that to a women.
I cannot believe how many times this lawyer asked about him just walking into the house without calling or knocking! I was like are you kidding me you're going to bring this up again! Not understanding why the other lawyer didn't object to asked and answered like the 70th time it was asked!? So glad the judge finally said something!
@@griffisjm Álso wasn't it cold oiutside too and we couldmnot see if he first rang the doorbell ? What was striking to me was that she stated , He told the nanny they would go to the park , she then asked her parents to go look if they were in the park , and after they told her theyb were in the park , she then went to the park , why ? To me that is kinda creepy needing therapy . Since she also stated that he never did anything wrong to her or the child ?
Yea exactly, her lawyer was laughing when he was describing the fear. Would it have been so funny if the ex husband had done the same thing… lawyer would be asking for jail time.
These people who falsely accuse their partners need to be held responsible for their actions. It disgusts me how many of these people have gotten away with this nonsense.
Tangeant, but your post made me think of this: I am so over people "Karening" and threatening to have service-people (or any public-facing employee) fired if they don't get satisfaction. Perhaps threatening someone's livelihood should be on par with a physical threat. They're threats intended to shake an employee's confidence in the facts of the situation and distract from the issue at hand. The employee's attention is now also running scenarios in their mind as to the potentially devastating, life-altering repercussions if they lose their job. It is a meaningful threat.
Her lawyer is awful. Wife is super shady, hiding recorders, has to be in charge. If it was the other way around he would have been arrested and have a TPO and not see his son.
This is such a slog to get through. The standard of evidence this man apparently needs to have is absolutely ludicrous. I hope he gets sole custody of the child and never has to see her again at this point. And I’ve not even heard her speak yet and it’s just absurd.
She is obsessive possessive and a control freak. She keeps saying "MY CHILD" like their son is her personal possession and property. His father is allowed to take his son places without her micromanagement, having to know their every single move to the extent that she hid tracking devices. She needs serious help and he needs custody of the child.
Without going to the merits of whether this particular mother is micromanaging or not, saying "my child," "my son," etc. isn't a red flag of anything, really. In fact, it's the _most_ common phrasing used, _especially_ in *intact* relationships. Using "our" when referring to children is actually an outgrowth of family court, believed to make a parent sound like a better co-parent to a judge, parenting evaluator, etc., and is something that has to be _taught,_ because the natural language choice is "my." (You might use "our" when talking _to_ the other parent -- "Hey, Husband. Do you know where our son is?" -- but you'd naturally use "my" when talking to third parties -- "Hey, Susan! Have you seen my daughter around?")
@coffeepeachesplans agreed. But she's a creepy stalker. The air tag in the diaper bag is okay, because the bag goes back and forth with the child. But there's no need for the others. It's controlling and stalkerish.
This woman’s attitude is that I’m so much better than all this and isn’t it just ridiculous that we are all here because I’m the perfect mom. Shes a perfect example of the reason why the husband needs to be afraid!
Appreciate you covering this. I watched the first part on Bigen's channel, and the comment I left was, if this were a man tracking and doing these things to a woman, we'd all be disgusted and would be rooting for a TPO to be put in place. I'm glad Judge Manning made a similar point, albeit more eloquently put. Judge Manning 100% made the right call here.
I didn't think I could love Judge Manning more but here we are. Good on her for putting on the record that if it was a woman it wouldn't have even taken that long to get the TPO. I adore her! Oh and this woman is so nasty. I thought so on the first video but the sass she's showing Judge Manning is disrespectful. She's sighing and rolling her eyes.
She's a classic Narcissist, rules don't apply to them and how dare they be held accountable.🙄 Poor guy...and any guy who fatefully chooses to deal with her.
Eh she’s pretty ridiculous and meek. I saw a case where a woman burned down the home with the father of her children in it and the attorney for the father was wanting a clear temporary custody order to ensure she couldn’t just waltz out of her facility she turned herself into (to avoid being arrested I’m sure), and that she can leave at any time and take the kids. And the amount of bs allowed to go on was stupid. A psychopath shouldn’t be allowed custody. And this judge was too afraid to step on the order of another judge when that judge didn’t do anything with custody anyway. All while the rich parents team of lawyers are crying that he is exploring their client because he bought some beds with them parents money that they offered him. 🙄
Oh Mike…. You haven’t met my husband! I installed all the car seats … and made the cot… and the bunk beds! And all the Ikea furniture ever bought!!! 😂😂😂
@@okayusa6608 Given the risk of parental kidnapping, I think it's entirely reasonable for the custodial parent to track where the non-custodial parent is taking the kid.
@@DesiArcyexcept that the car seat stays in his car even when he doesn’t have their child, not to mention that there was an AirTag on the bottom of his car. If it were truly about keeping an eye on where he takes THEIR child, keeping a tracker in the baby bag would suffice. Although, I don’t agree with that either!! It’s his child too. If he was the one putting tracking devices in her vehicle or in anything that would be in her possession, this would be a very different conversation. There is no reason at all, to think that he would “kidnap” the baby. If he had previously threatened to do that or had tried to do that before, then her argument/actions would make sense. But there is absolutely no reason for her to want to track their child and the evidence (a tracking device in his car/in the baby seat) shows that it actually isn’t about the child.
@@DesiArcythere was never an apparent, reasonable risk of kidnapping in this case. Mom was the only one of the two parents who had shown documented (verbal) abuse towards the child. So no, there is absolutely no case for her doing that. Completely out of line and breaks the law in (as we see) a number of ways.
The fire department training to install car seats is painfully long and detailed. The idea that she wanted to do it “so it was done right” is pretty crazy. The training is multi day and covers pretty much every type of restraint system.
I find it funny that so many commenters do not know that the fire department installs car seats. Unfortunately, many people install them incorrectly causing many infants to be injured in car accidents. When I had bought a car seat that had a tether, etc. I took it to my local fire department and they installed it properly. My son also got a chance to check out the fire trucks. A win win, in my opinion.
Most area have car seat days or people who can help. (Call the public health or wic office they’ll know who) Note: replace seat in even small accidents. Carefully inspect seat if you airline check it.
@@monie2193 I’ve installed one or five car seats, I don’t think there was any math involved. To me, I would rather go to the dentist than suffer the humiliation of .. ehh never mind
@squattingbull10 thank you for giving us all a real life example of why some forms of abuse are still not reported. You must be really insecure if you need to show off your perceived manhood on every small thing, including installing a car seat. Let me tell you one thing: the fact that you see this as a humiliation speaks a lot about your so-called manhood. Definitely not the way people here perceive you, to me you sound arrogant, ridiculous, and definitely not mature. Maybe this is your definition of manhood
The wife’s attorney in this case is ridiculous. He basically challenges the husband’s manhood because he’s expressing fear of his wife based on her non-consensual surveillance. If the genders were reversed, he would not be treated that way without harsh criticism for that attorney. Her custodial interference with the father is not healthy for their child AT ALL.
Agree 👍💯 and I've been the target of an abusive ex bf 40 years ago and my late second husband. As Debbie Davis stated during episode of 2 kooky drunks, guy threatened her w/ taser & blowtorch, per DV "the wheel of power and control". It's never @ love for abusive people, they're void of anything resembling love! 😞 it's ALL @ the abuser exercising power and control.
Manhood.. that’s precious, he needs the FD to install a car seat, regardless of intent it sounds like mom was able to wrestle that alligator in under 2 min - I’d be honored to go get my nails done with her. Aside - AirTags are crummy @ tracking cars.
Not everyone can do all things. The fact that he wanted to go to the fire department, and have them help, with the car seat, doesn't mean he's a bad father. Or that she can install, a car seat means she's the best mother's.
Why does he have to tell her where he’s taking his child? I’m sure she doesn’t communicate to him where she’s taking the child. Plus putting a tracker under is car is in no way tracking her child. If he’s with the child only on weekends then you knowing where your husband is the rest of the time is in no way a safety concern for the child. This lady is crazy and had the tables been turned there wouldn’t be all this. The second there is a mention of a man placing a tracker on his partner’s car would be an automatic TPO.
Very interesting that she maintains cameras in the home, but doesn’t have a recording of him putting his hands on her bet it’s because it shows her slapping him
He never hit her. She really thought she had it all figured out. Hopefully her lies and planned sneaky things she does will go against her. He better run and hide from her
@@bucketreeyes I deal with these type of parents all the time and they are very scary, manipulative and use children as tools to accomplish their underhanded goals.
I saw right through the wife, she’s all that drama with a big passive aggressive cherry on top! 🍒 HE left HER, so she’s pissed and gonna find out where he’s going. I’m glad judge Manning could see it as well.😊
She testified at one point that she put the camera in the basement because she found the child's teddy bear or something down there so she wanted to be able to watch her son. Then she testified that she took the camera out of the basement because her husband had moved all of his stuff out so it wasn't necessary to have it there anymore.
She’s taking acting lessons from AH, and failing just as miserably…also why was a small child/baby playing in the basement by themselves? Especially if they’re a child still using a bottle…
@@sugakookie6303exactly. Especially with boxes everywhere. The kid could easily get hurt. Like this women would let that kid anywhere alone. She’s a complete nut.
I am so grateful that I wasn't drinking anything when you/Mike delivered the line, "What a monster." 😆 Perfection! The estranged husband calmly entered the home and remained near in the entryway/foyer, looking expectant as his arrival was absolutely anticipated. Walked in without knocking or ringing the doorbell? Habit. A little grace given for adjustment would be a classy look.
The Judge is AWESOME AND IS 100% a BAD ASS! As for the “FEAR”, this can be an abundance of things, false allegations that could ruin his career, livelihood, Normal way of life etc!
I've said it before and I'll say it again, I love love love Judge Manning!! She doesn't miss a word or facial expressions or attitude. Another excellent example of her fair mindedness and knowledge of the law. Oh, and she doesn't appear to be harmed in the least that her folks swore in front of her, and still do! LOL
Did she just admit she put the trackers in the car and car seat. Great job as a lawyer to let her admit this! I'm starting to wonder if the attorney is secretly helping Mr. Peter's win a TPO
She's in court she has to make that very ultra extremely one hundred percent clear for and in the record so yes she was smart to make sure there's no confusing there
If he had placed AirTags on three items, w/o telling her, she would get a TPO. I do think they are a toxic couple and need separation but this particular AirTag problem is creepy and unacceptable.
This is going to continue for this toxic couple until Henry, the kiddo, reaches 18. Each is obsessed about inflicting pain on each other and trying to make points.
Thanks for covering this while big was busy! I watched the 1st part on his channel and got hooked! This lady clearly has control issues. If u trust someone enough to have a baby with them, u should trust them to be competent to care for the child without your oversight. All this bs after divorce just impeaches your own decision making bc u chose them.
hi..just stopping by real quick...I saw someone in the livechat ask what that thing covering the court reporter's mouth was...I looked it up, its called a Stenomask and "it allows voice transcription in noisy environments. Perhaps more importantly, a stenomask silences the user's voice so that it does not interfere with the surrounding environment such as a court or a classroom. The user can verbally identify the speaker, indicate gestures and unspoken answers, and describe activities as they take place." It can allow via speech transcription upwards of 185 words per minute w/ a minimum of 95% accuracy. Sounds really neat.
This lady is using the son to keep tabs on her ex husband. She doesn’t even have a right to dictate where he goes with that baby if his safety isn’t in jeopardy. She makes it obvious she wants to make digs at him and is CLEARLY still very interested in what he’s doing. I just had to add this is one of the most blatant examples of women being able to get away with stalking and harassing behaviors, the defense attorney and even the GAL act like he just can’t actually be scared. Like if she knows where he is at all times she can have someone else do something to him Ms peters is playing a dangerous game and men have every right to stand their ground! I mean come tf on how many men end up dead and at the root it’s a custody or divorce and it’s never some woman that looks like her name is big Bertha it’s a woman that looks like Ms peters. She has no right to interfere in his life PERIOD
Mike, you had great commentary at the end of this video! Everything you said about this was spot on and (hopefully) would have made sense to some of the people who were jumping on you during the chat saying you were “one-sided”. The “sister-code” is VERY VERY strong and we often find women coming to defend women even when they’re not defendable; as clearly displayed here. If you’re using a logical mind, and not in your feelings, it’s EASY to see this lady stepped outside of normal societal boundaries, she just did. You don’t track people without their knowledge and permission, certainly not just because they have the child of theirs (theirs as in BOTH parents, this isn’t “her son”, it’s THEIR son).
I said this during the live feed but she put the tags in his car to watch what he does ie going somewhere she deemed inappropriate for their divorce and custody case.
@@miketyson1717 I know that but that was her goal I guarantee it because why else would she have 2 air tags in her car that could track him even when he doesn't have his son
Imagine trying to argue against a TPO against your client by trying to raise all the other awful things you're client has done as if that somehow helps.
I think she was trying to be deceptive during her testimony and cross examination. She was too jovial and trying to downplay certain actions, including not remembering when she put the air tag on his car. She remembers, but didn't want to make herself seem even more devious, Her blinking, looking down to text and not able to sit still all scream she was in the wrong. It annoyed me that she kept saying "my son". She needs friends and family that will tell her when she's stepping over the line.
She definitely was stalking him. I think she was hoping to catch him with a GF in the park, or at an apartment. It would give her a 'leg up' in Divorce Court, showing infidelity.
I was struck by her reference to HER child over and over. It's their child, shared custody. The car seat was HIS property and the car is HIS property and which I think means that she should not have put tags in HIS property without consent. She talking him. If the tags are truly to track the their child, then she should let him know. Judge and Mike sure nailed this one.
It’s not for Henry, maybe originally it was an idea to keep a check on the nanny but it is clear she wants to isolate, punish and control her ex. She is trying to see exactly what he is doing all the time and to find any thing she can use to get sole custody and probably as much money from the divorce as she can. No one has any right to put any tracking on anyone without their knowledge, even Nannie’s should have the legal right to know they may be tracked or recorded.
Mike : I don't know if you will get this message but I just wanted to say Thank YOU soooooo much for making my hard day's so much BETTER! I put you on and the laughter does not stop. Not just because these cases are crazy unbelievable : But hearing you laugh is just contagious I absolutely love it! So many times I have been really down and every SINGLE time I forget problems. Luv ya 👍🥰 Thank you. Take care AND stay safe. Your theee BEST. A Diamond. 💎
The faces and heavy breathing from the wife just shows so much about her. She reeks of manipulation, entitlement and superiority. She was crawling out of her skin as Judge M granted the TPO. She couldn't stand hearing what she did was wrong and that she wasn't getting her way. I'm so glad Judge M granted it and showed her she can't control everyone just because she feels like she can.
I’ve never been married and I enjoy watching family court hearings if only to validate my decisions. When my relatives ask why I never married, I just shrug my shoulders and say all I have to show for my life is freedom and wealth.
She put a tracker on her ex husbands car and she thinks that’s normal behavior. She was totally trying to track her ex not their son. She’s a controlling narcissist.
That device Ms Evans is wearing in the top frame is a voice to text machine deal, which is neat, but do all court proceedings have to have a human interface for court recordings? That is even today with video and high tech equipment.. is there a rule or a law that says there has to be a human in the loop? I was just curious.
@@patscats2080 I am a Southern belle from SC and met the Murdaugh family in our family restaurant, Rose Cottage. He is guilty but he was very sweet to his family. So very sad!!
@@mimidebrose I agree it’s very sad. It’s hard to believe that these two people got murdered in a brutal way because of money. I know he got himself into lots of financial trouble but how can he kill his family, since, like Maggie said, they can start over. I know he probably isn’t popular now because he was rich and entitled but I can’t stop thinking how sad this is. It didn’t have to happen.
@@patscats2080 I am amazed at myself because I came into the trial thinking he was guilty but I am not convinced anymore. I don’t know what the jury will decide, but as of now, I am ambivalent. The states failure to investigate the scene properly is leading me to not convict him.
@@Creative-Chaos I’ve changed too. But I’m still leaning towards he was responsible but had it done. I don’t think he had time to do anything or clean up. But somehow he is part of it. I just don’t think he did it himself. The investigation was awful and so is the prosecution. I doubt he’ll be convicted.
If Mr. Alexander doesn’t believe ‘closing the space’ and balled up fists are scarey, then perhaps Bigen and I should provide physical portrayals and then, after, fresh pants for Mr. Alexander.
As a guardian ad litem and family law attorney, I do find that sort of controlling behavior (air tags) very concerning. The husband's behavior as well, however, suggests that there was a lot of ego battling and power plays going on--it is basic courtesy to knock especislly more so when tensions are high. It's hard to know full history of these two based on what we have heard, (with a caveat that the wife comes across as non credible in her testimony), but it's clear each side has enough money to keep this going and to fight over this poor little child stuck in the middle.
Really good and even handed comment. Toxic people in a toxic marriage, now torturing the child with a toxic divorce. Neither willing to put ego aside for the child.
It’s common for the fire department to install car seats, or at least inspect that you’ve done it properly if you swing by a firehouse. There are so many different brands/models & people don’t always do it properly. 🚒🚒
I saw her DWI arrest a few nights ago. She had the same outfit on. She felt so entitled and so over the top! She was a newscaster in Atlanta and a few days later, she was terminated!
Sorry, I know your comment is 10 months old now but thanks! I have seen the arrest also and didn’t realise it was her. She was awful in that, so entitled and dismissive of the police. Thanks again!
I’m catching up after work but wanted to add, I’ve gotten to 1:24:28 of the video (not sure how it ends yet) but..all I can visualize when I watch her testify is Amber Heard (without the tears).
Judge is so correct. If the roles were reversed, would be a slam dunk but for a man to fear a woman people think it's funny. Personally I believe we need true equality when it comes to abuse and self defense
Her attorney pretty much tried to shame him into trying to say that exactly!
the special treatment for women who abuse in any way has to stop! they wanted equality so give it to them! and yes, I am a woman from birth til now at 43 as of yesterday 😂 I am not ok with any special treatment of any kind for anyone except 1. infants and small children 2. elderly 3. substantially disabled and that’s it! no gender or race deserves superior treatment ever bottom line.
I think Mrs Peters is a pretty good liar. Just my opinion. Stumbling quite a bit about the “Henry” exchange. Lots of “umm”” and “so…” The eye contact. Something about those forced eye contacts - and then looking down and to the side. Sort of a typical response when not being completely forthright.
@@pistolgripsand you can tell when she is lying also, she gets really quiet when shes lying, and talks nice and loud when she's not.
I raised two boys and I watched one of them get bi%Ch slapped by a girlfriend as she put it "as a joke" leaving red raised skin and welts. She almost met whatever God she subscribes to. I also believe in equality on the judicial front but that said this is totally geared as a Hemanwomanhatersclub channel. Lets start with being fair here also.
I'm not a lawyer, but judge gets the "if the gender roles were reversed" argument perfect.
Can we get a hell yeah for keeping Dads in the Children's Lives !
The wife's attorney comes across as a jerk, at least to me. At first I thought he was wording questions poorly, but after a while it seemed he was wording them to intentionally trap the husband with double negatives and vague statements. I've had no formal legal training, but it seemed kind of slimy to me.
I'm only half way through so still BOD becuase maybe he knows something I don't so far he could be lying
But mate at points he was kinda straight up victim blaming like 'well if you were a real victim you;d do this' imagine if it was the other way around and he said that to a women.
You know his fingers been in some seriously rank women
In this case, the ex-wife is slimy and so is her lawyer.
He did great I loved his wisdoms
I cannot believe how many times this lawyer asked about him just walking into the house without calling or knocking! I was like are you kidding me you're going to bring this up again! Not understanding why the other lawyer didn't object to asked and answered like the 70th time it was asked!? So glad the judge finally said something!
And if his using his keys and just walking in was so upsetting why wouldn't she just change the locks.
When your opponent is hanging themselves you let them keep going.
He made it seem like he just walked in and took over. I get it was wrong but dude walked in a and waited calmly in the foyer.
@@griffisjm Álso wasn't it cold oiutside too and we couldmnot see if he first rang the doorbell ? What was striking to me was that she stated , He told the nanny they would go to the park , she then asked her parents to go look if they were in the park , and after they told her theyb were in the park , she then went to the park , why ? To me that is kinda creepy needing therapy . Since she also stated that he never did anything wrong to her or the child ?
He was actually very respectful about that he could had been aggressive
Everyone thinks this is no big deal until they find that first airtag.
Yeah that’s a scary escalation.
Yep
Yea exactly, her lawyer was laughing when he was describing the fear. Would it have been so funny if the ex husband had done the same thing… lawyer would be asking for jail time.
Exactly.
The one in the diaper bag is fine. But the other air tag placemats are stalker material.
@jaggirl no they aren't dads don't carry diaper bags comma duh
This was crazy!!! I was so happy she got the TPO placed on her!
These people who falsely accuse their partners need to be held responsible for their actions. It disgusts me how many of these people have gotten away with this nonsense.
Well, you are suppose to be responsible for your actions at any rate, but I haven't seen this all and want to see her screwy side if there is one.
Understand it's no longer just woman either.
Tangeant, but your post made me think of this: I am so over people "Karening" and threatening to have service-people (or any public-facing employee) fired if they don't get satisfaction. Perhaps threatening someone's livelihood should be on par with a physical threat. They're threats intended to shake an employee's confidence in the facts of the situation and distract from the issue at hand. The employee's attention is now also running scenarios in their mind as to the potentially devastating, life-altering repercussions if they lose their job. It is a meaningful threat.
The wife is in the wrong.
Henry is the one who’s really suffering here, adults behaving like children and the kid has to grow up with these two brats
Her lawyer is awful. Wife is super shady, hiding recorders, has to be in charge. If it was the other way around he would have been arrested and have a TPO and not see his son.
The wife is so annoyed listening to the ruling 😂 love it!
This is such a slog to get through. The standard of evidence this man apparently needs to have is absolutely ludicrous. I hope he gets sole custody of the child and never has to see her again at this point. And I’ve not even heard her speak yet and it’s just absurd.
She is obsessive possessive and a control freak. She keeps saying "MY CHILD" like their son is her personal possession and property. His father is allowed to take his son places without her micromanagement, having to know their every single move to the extent that she hid tracking devices. She needs serious help and he needs custody of the child.
I think we all agree with you
Without going to the merits of whether this particular mother is micromanaging or not, saying "my child," "my son," etc. isn't a red flag of anything, really. In fact, it's the _most_ common phrasing used, _especially_ in *intact* relationships. Using "our" when referring to children is actually an outgrowth of family court, believed to make a parent sound like a better co-parent to a judge, parenting evaluator, etc., and is something that has to be _taught,_ because the natural language choice is "my."
(You might use "our" when talking _to_ the other parent -- "Hey, Husband. Do you know where our son is?" -- but you'd naturally use "my" when talking to third parties -- "Hey, Susan! Have you seen my daughter around?")
She's supposed to do that is called being a real parent
@coffeepeachesplans agreed.
But she's a creepy stalker. The air tag in the diaper bag is okay, because the bag goes back and forth with the child. But there's no need for the others.
It's controlling and stalkerish.
@jaggirl no it's not she said she did what she had to do AND SHE WAS RIGHT that makes her a good parent AND a good ex actually
This woman’s attitude is that I’m so much better than all this and isn’t it just ridiculous that we are all here because I’m the perfect mom. Shes a perfect example of the reason why the husband needs to be afraid!
100%
Appreciate you covering this. I watched the first part on Bigen's channel, and the comment I left was, if this were a man tracking and doing these things to a woman, we'd all be disgusted and would be rooting for a TPO to be put in place. I'm glad Judge Manning made a similar point, albeit more eloquently put. Judge Manning 100% made the right call here.
@wdzimmerman710 Yeah, Bigen wasn't able to cover the second part, so he asked Mike to do it.
What is that person doing between the judge and Mr Peter's
@@maryannlohr7379they are recording the testimonies
@@maryannlohr7379a stenomask
I didn't think I could love Judge Manning more but here we are. Good on her for putting on the record that if it was a woman it wouldn't have even taken that long to get the TPO. I adore her!
Oh and this woman is so nasty. I thought so on the first video but the sass she's showing Judge Manning is disrespectful. She's sighing and rolling her eyes.
She's a classic Narcissist, rules don't apply to them and how dare they be held accountable.🙄
Poor guy...and any guy who fatefully chooses to deal with her.
This woman is a nasty, narcissist, manipulator. Poor little boy.
We love Judge Manning. Regardless.
Judge Manning is my FAVORITE judge to watch!! She genuinely seems fair, is funny and works her tail off!!! #judgemanning
Agreed
Eh she’s pretty ridiculous and meek. I saw a case where a woman burned down the home with the father of her children in it and the attorney for the father was wanting a clear temporary custody order to ensure she couldn’t just waltz out of her facility she turned herself into (to avoid being arrested I’m sure), and that she can leave at any time and take the kids.
And the amount of bs allowed to go on was stupid. A psychopath shouldn’t be allowed custody. And this judge was too afraid to step on the order of another judge when that judge didn’t do anything with custody anyway.
All while the rich parents team of lawyers are crying that he is exploring their client because he bought some beds with them parents money that they offered him. 🙄
Amen
Oh Mike…. You haven’t met my husband! I installed all the car seats … and made the cot… and the bunk beds!
And all the Ikea furniture ever bought!!!
😂😂😂
I would think it would me MOSTLY women that do it. That was a weird thing for him to say.
Lol. Ditto! That's the way my family works too!
Then my husband must have a twin!!
I’m sorry but she’s literally justifying the fact that she’s TRACKING HER EX HUSBANDS CAR 😭😭😭
HEY, she's just tracking HER child. Not their child.
@@okayusa6608 Given the risk of parental kidnapping, I think it's entirely reasonable for the custodial parent to track where the non-custodial parent is taking the kid.
@@DesiArcyexcept that the car seat stays in his car even when he doesn’t have their child, not to mention that there was an AirTag on the bottom of his car. If it were truly about keeping an eye on where he takes THEIR child, keeping a tracker in the baby bag would suffice. Although, I don’t agree with that either!! It’s his child too. If he was the one putting tracking devices in her vehicle or in anything that would be in her possession, this would be a very different conversation. There is no reason at all, to think that he would “kidnap” the baby. If he had previously threatened to do that or had tried to do that before, then her argument/actions would make sense. But there is absolutely no reason for her to want to track their child and the evidence (a tracking device in his car/in the baby seat) shows that it actually isn’t about the child.
@@DesiArcythere was never an apparent, reasonable risk of kidnapping in this case. Mom was the only one of the two parents who had shown documented (verbal) abuse towards the child. So no, there is absolutely no case for her doing that. Completely out of line and breaks the law in (as we see) a number of ways.
Ya know when Michael McDonald put a tracker on his wife’s car he was punished for it pretty swiftly.
The fire department training to install car seats is painfully long and detailed. The idea that she wanted to do it “so it was done right” is pretty crazy. The training is multi day and covers pretty much every type of restraint system.
When I heard that he was going to go there, I, ah ah ah, well, I, better just leave it there
I find it funny that so many commenters do not know that the fire department installs car seats. Unfortunately, many people install them incorrectly causing many infants to be injured in car accidents. When I had bought a car seat that had a tether, etc. I took it to my local fire department and they installed it properly. My son also got a chance to check out the fire trucks. A win win, in my opinion.
Most area have car seat days or people who can help. (Call the public health or wic office they’ll know who) Note: replace seat in even small accidents. Carefully inspect seat if you airline check it.
@@monie2193 I’ve installed one or five car seats, I don’t think there was any math involved. To me, I would rather go to the dentist than suffer the humiliation of .. ehh never mind
@squattingbull10 thank you for giving us all a real life example of why some forms of abuse are still not reported. You must be really insecure if you need to show off your perceived manhood on every small thing, including installing a car seat. Let me tell you one thing: the fact that you see this as a humiliation speaks a lot about your so-called manhood. Definitely not the way people here perceive you, to me you sound arrogant, ridiculous, and definitely not mature. Maybe this is your definition of manhood
The wife’s attorney in this case is ridiculous. He basically challenges the husband’s manhood because he’s expressing fear of his wife based on her non-consensual surveillance. If the genders were reversed, he would not be treated that way without harsh criticism for that attorney. Her custodial interference with the father is not healthy for their child AT ALL.
Agree 👍💯 and I've been the target of an abusive ex bf 40 years ago and my late second husband.
As Debbie Davis stated during episode of 2 kooky drunks, guy threatened her w/ taser & blowtorch, per DV "the wheel of power and control". It's never @ love for abusive people, they're void of anything resembling love! 😞 it's ALL @ the abuser exercising power and control.
Manhood.. that’s precious, he needs the FD to install a car seat, regardless of intent it sounds like mom was able to wrestle that alligator in under 2 min - I’d be honored to go get my nails done with her. Aside - AirTags are crummy @ tracking cars.
Not everyone can do all things. The fact that he wanted to go to the fire department, and have them help, with the car seat, doesn't mean he's a bad father. Or that she can install, a car seat means she's the best mother's.
He should have questioned his manhood over the fact that he needed to have a fireman install his kid's car seat for him.
The FD installs many car seats because so many people do it wrong and babies are killed.
The defendants attitude when being questioned is absolutely ridiculous and makes is 100% understandable why he wanted a divorce lol
Why does he have to tell her where he’s taking his child? I’m sure she doesn’t communicate to him where she’s taking the child. Plus putting a tracker under is car is in no way tracking her child. If he’s with the child only on weekends then you knowing where your husband is the rest of the time is in no way a safety concern for the child. This lady is crazy and had the tables been turned there wouldn’t be all this. The second there is a mention of a man placing a tracker on his partner’s car would be an automatic TPO.
It has been proven that she is tracking him. And she still has the gall to claim she isn't tracking him.
I wish the attorney for Halton when questioning Candace asked a question that would have been a key point "Ma'am, do you have key tags in your car?"
She said she has one on her key chain!!
I have a tracker on my keychain because I lose my keys. But I DON’T have one on boyfriend’s keys. He can find his own keys.
Very interesting that she maintains cameras in the home, but doesn’t have a recording of him putting his hands on her bet it’s because it shows her slapping him
💯 exactly
👍
she trying her best to control her anger. it is getting the best of her..
I gave her all the benefit of the doubt until I heard her admit she put airtags on the carseat lol.
He never hit her. She really thought she had it all figured out. Hopefully her lies and planned sneaky things she does will go against her. He better run and hide from her
Agree‼️
I think her whole modus operandi is to get full custody of the child therefore the home and full maintenance 😮
Her family raised a violent woman... violence is standing in someone's face waving a finger and shouting swears 🤬 she is a piece of work
@@bucketreeyes I deal with these type of parents all the time and they are very scary, manipulative and use children as tools to accomplish their underhanded goals.
I saw right through the wife, she’s all that drama with a big passive aggressive cherry on top! 🍒
HE left HER, so she’s pissed and gonna find out where he’s going. I’m glad judge Manning could see it as well.😊
Can you imagine when he gets remarried! Yikes 😳
@@MortgageGirl7no. He's too rude to be married. If he does marry he will be divorced again and again
She testified at one point that she put the camera in the basement because she found the child's teddy bear or something down there so she wanted to be able to watch her son. Then she testified that she took the camera out of the basement because her husband had moved all of his stuff out so it wasn't necessary to have it there anymore.
She’s taking acting lessons from AH, and failing just as miserably…also why was a small child/baby playing in the basement by themselves? Especially if they’re a child still using a bottle…
Yep-- good catch! This woman is a psycho!
@@sugakookie6303exactly. Especially with boxes everywhere. The kid could easily get hurt. Like this women would let that kid anywhere alone. She’s a complete nut.
She just told on herself..😅
@@sugakookie6303
👍🤣🤣🤣
I am so grateful that I wasn't drinking anything when you/Mike delivered the line, "What a monster." 😆 Perfection!
The estranged husband calmly entered the home and remained near in the entryway/foyer, looking expectant as his arrival was absolutely anticipated. Walked in without knocking or ringing the doorbell? Habit. A little grace given for adjustment would be a classy look.
The Judge is AWESOME AND IS 100% a BAD ASS!
As for the “FEAR”, this can be an abundance of things, false allegations that could ruin his career, livelihood, Normal way of life etc!
She knows how to install a car seat better than the Fire Department??? Really???
because it's HER CHILD AND SHE KNOWS EVERYTHING
Usually when someone says “absolutely not” it’s a lie.
She’s crazy for sure. The way her attitude flipped when the lady started questioning her is very telling.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, I love love love Judge Manning!! She doesn't miss a word or facial expressions or attitude. Another excellent example of her fair mindedness and knowledge of the law. Oh, and she doesn't appear to be harmed in the least that her folks swore in front of her, and still do! LOL
Did she just admit she put the trackers in the car and car seat. Great job as a lawyer to let her admit this! I'm starting to wonder if the attorney is secretly helping Mr. Peter's win a TPO
So ringing the doorbell or knocking on the door
will prevent domestic assaultive behavior? I wish I knew this about 5 years ago lol
Lol me too, although I'd never get to experience the beautiful building of the Vegas family court 😜
Your channel has made me realize how many terrible lawyers there are out there
Glad I could be of service 😂
Also hard to defend a person who keeps doing stupid things and causing trouble yet your expected to give them some sort of defense to excuse it!
I'm always 6 months behind... Lawyer for wifey scares me ..not keeping his business cars 😂
Judge Manning nailed it!!
Mrs Peter's blatantly texting. Laughing, and constantly looking down.
The fact she ONLY uses “MY child” tells me all I need to know about who she is
She's in court she has to make that very ultra extremely one hundred percent clear for and in the record so yes she was smart to make sure there's no confusing there
Oh and the dad keeps calling them his too if that helps
Oh please yall this woman is a nut … come on 😅
@@MiastarotI mostly hear Henry Henry Henry from dad. Mom’s demeanor is clearly telling
@@jessicaking8752 no they both did and they both seem like great parents I think moms concern was him taking the baby to the bar
Just because he can take her physically doesn't mean he's not in fear He can't stop a bullet and she seems like the type
And so does her family. That poor kid.
If he had placed AirTags on three items, w/o telling her, she would get a TPO. I do think they are a toxic couple and need separation but this particular AirTag problem is creepy and unacceptable.
This is going to continue for this toxic couple until Henry, the kiddo, reaches 18. Each is obsessed about inflicting pain on each other and trying to make points.
I love Judge Manning. She nailed it, as always!
She is the best…this chick is nuts , all this spy wear in his car, car seat , and diaper bag…..
Thanks for covering this while big was busy! I watched the 1st part on his channel and got hooked! This lady clearly has control issues. If u trust someone enough to have a baby with them, u should trust them to be competent to care for the child without your oversight. All this bs after divorce just impeaches your own decision making bc u chose them.
hi..just stopping by real quick...I saw someone in the livechat ask what that thing covering the court reporter's mouth was...I looked it up, its called a Stenomask and "it allows voice transcription in noisy environments. Perhaps more importantly, a stenomask silences the user's voice so that it does not interfere with the surrounding environment such as a court or a classroom. The user can verbally identify the speaker, indicate gestures and unspoken answers, and describe activities as they take place." It can allow via speech transcription upwards of 185 words per minute w/ a minimum of 95% accuracy. Sounds really neat.
That's really cool. Thanks for sharing the info!
That male attorney is really obnoxious, although it appears he thinks he’s being cute.
Yeah I'm rooting for dad just cause I hate that attorney
He is the only one who thinks he is cute.
On the first hearing he acted like he was schooling judge manning. Not cool
Thank you for showing me part two. You and Bigen are the best court reporters on UA-cam.
The thing is the husband might be afraid but that is not going to override his decision to get his son and protect him.
Congratulations 👏👏 Mr.Peterson !!!
This lady is using the son to keep tabs on her ex husband. She doesn’t even have a right to dictate where he goes with that baby if his safety isn’t in jeopardy. She makes it obvious she wants to make digs at him and is CLEARLY still very interested in what he’s doing. I just had to add this is one of the most blatant examples of women being able to get away with stalking and harassing behaviors, the defense attorney and even the GAL act like he just can’t actually be scared. Like if she knows where he is at all times she can have someone else do something to him Ms peters is playing a dangerous game and men have every right to stand their ground! I mean come tf on how many men end up dead and at the root it’s a custody or divorce and it’s never some woman that looks like her name is big Bertha it’s a woman that looks like Ms peters. She has no right to interfere in his life PERIOD
Mike, you had great commentary at the end of this video! Everything you said about this was spot on and (hopefully) would have made sense to some of the people who were jumping on you during the chat saying you were “one-sided”. The “sister-code” is VERY VERY strong and we often find women coming to defend women even when they’re not defendable; as clearly displayed here. If you’re using a logical mind, and not in your feelings, it’s EASY to see this lady stepped outside of normal societal boundaries, she just did. You don’t track people without their knowledge and permission, certainly not just because they have the child of theirs (theirs as in BOTH parents, this isn’t “her son”, it’s THEIR son).
She can't deny the airtags were added later. Cameras in your home is up to you, but on an ex's car. No.
It raises red flags if a woman wants to install a child’s car seat? Are you serious? Ahahahahahaa! 🤣😂 Wow! You’re… something special lol!
This mom is the QUEEEEEN of passive aggressiveness
Find you a lawyer that argues that putting a tracking device on someone’s car is just no big deal lol
The woman can't stop texting or be bothered to pay attention! She is stalking ...
I cannot get enough of this judge. She is awesomeness and funny as heck.
I watched this one. She smiled every time he talked about violence. She is vindictive!
Not only is she stalking his every move his entire family is keeping track of all he movements as well?
I do not believe that woman at all... at all. I know waaaaay too many women like her.
False allocation of abuse is a real occurrence
I said this during the live feed but she put the tags in his car to watch what he does ie going somewhere she deemed inappropriate for their divorce and custody case.
That's not how coparenting works
@@miketyson1717 I know that but that was her goal I guarantee it because why else would she have 2 air tags in her car that could track him even when he doesn't have his son
Is it just me or is the defendant completely checked out of this proceeding the whole time until she was called on?
She can't stop texting for sure.
She's busy buying airtag alternatives on amazon.
I pretty much agree with the Judge's conclusion. I think the mom definitely came off as less believable.
5:32pm est
I just found your channel about a month ago! I come here when I need a good laugh! 😂
Imagine trying to argue against a TPO against your client by trying to raise all the other awful things you're client has done as if that somehow helps.
I think she was trying to be deceptive during her testimony and cross examination. She was too jovial and trying to downplay certain actions, including not remembering when she put the air tag on his car. She remembers, but didn't want to make herself seem even more devious, Her blinking, looking down to text and not able to sit still all scream she was in the wrong. It annoyed me that she kept saying "my son". She needs friends and family that will tell her when she's stepping over the line.
I think she got snotty right out the first questi of cross examination
She definitely was stalking him. I think she was hoping to catch him with a GF in the park, or at an apartment. It would give her a 'leg up' in Divorce Court, showing infidelity.
I was struck by her reference to HER child over and over. It's their child, shared custody. The car seat was HIS property and the car is HIS property and which I think means that she should not have put tags in HIS property without consent. She talking him. If the tags are truly to track the their child, then she should let him know. Judge and Mike sure nailed this one.
He said it too. And then did the backstroke she just didn't bother to "look good"!
Wow I finally caught a live. You Rock Mike!
Thank you
I love Judge Manning so much! All I could think was that *I'm* scared of her. A crazy person tracking your movements is terrifying.
Wait...I and my Daughters installed the car seats all the time 😮
I feel sorry for Henry having a mother like this who wants his every move recorded and tracked.
Right? Like what is the need for cameras in his bedroom?
yeah, it's not healthy. i really think she was using it as excuse to stalk her husband, though. either way, the kid's caught up in all that crap. 🥺
It’s not for Henry, maybe originally it was an idea to keep a check on the nanny but it is clear she wants to isolate, punish and control her ex. She is trying to see exactly what he is doing all the time and to find any thing she can use to get sole custody and probably as much money from the divorce as she can. No one has any right to put any tracking on anyone without their knowledge, even Nannie’s should have the legal right to know they may be tracked or recorded.
@@j3ttagrl420it will be for Henry too. You think once he starts dating girls she isn’t going to go full psycho stalker on him too?
@@elvickRULES oh, God! 😖
Mike : I don't know if you will get this message but I just wanted to say Thank YOU soooooo much for making my hard day's so much BETTER! I put you on and the laughter does not stop. Not just because these cases are crazy unbelievable : But hearing you laugh is just contagious I absolutely love it! So many times I have been really down and every SINGLE time I forget problems. Luv ya 👍🥰 Thank you.
Take care AND stay safe. Your theee BEST. A Diamond. 💎
If my ex just let himself into the house without knocking, police absolutely would be involved. And possibly a coroner.
One of the best judges on the internet Thank you much
The faces and heavy breathing from the wife just shows so much about her. She reeks of manipulation, entitlement and superiority. She was crawling out of her skin as Judge M granted the TPO. She couldn't stand hearing what she did was wrong and that she wasn't getting her way. I'm so glad Judge M granted it and showed her she can't control everyone just because she feels like she can.
Well said bravo 👏👏👏
Lol! In Utah most of the mom’s install the car seats. Guess it all depends on where you live.
The woman is crazy!! Judge nailed it.
My mom showed me your channel a few months back, I’ve been hooked ever since
Yeah I completely agree. If it’s his time with their son, he can take the child anywhere he wants. It’s none of her business!!
HE was "being difficult" but SHE is the one who insisted on putting the baby's jacket on and GRABBED it?!
I’ve never been married and I enjoy watching family court hearings if only to validate my decisions. When my relatives ask why I never married, I just shrug my shoulders and say all I have to show for my life is freedom and wealth.
I have freedom , some wealth , as many intimate partners as I like and DOGS!
👍
100% with you
I'm single. My daughter wants me to date and I tell her no!
I want to be Judge Manning when I grow up too. Lol
I Love Her.
She put a tracker on her ex husbands car and she thinks that’s normal behavior. She was totally trying to track her ex not their son. She’s a controlling narcissist.
That device Ms Evans is wearing in the top frame is a voice to text machine deal, which is neat, but do all court proceedings have to have a human interface for court recordings? That is even today with video and high tech equipment.. is there a rule or a law that says there has to be a human in the loop? I was just curious.
Manning nailed it. Well done.
You absolutely know when you put a tracking device on the undercarriage of your husbands car. This woman is insane!
Happy to see you with your great videos. Murdaugh trial has had my attention so I missed your channel 😘😘😘🐾🐾🐾🐕🐕🐕😊😊😊
Me too. I’m missing Mike and Bigen during the day as I’m riveted to the Murdaugh trial.
@@patscats2080 I am a Southern belle from SC and met the Murdaugh family in our family restaurant, Rose Cottage. He is guilty but he was very sweet to his family. So very sad!!
@@mimidebrose I agree it’s very sad. It’s hard to believe that these two people got murdered in a brutal way because of money. I know he got himself into lots of financial trouble but how can he kill his family, since, like Maggie said, they can start over. I know he probably isn’t popular now because he was rich and entitled but I can’t stop thinking how sad this is. It didn’t have to happen.
@@patscats2080 I am amazed at myself because I came into the trial thinking he was guilty but I am not convinced anymore. I don’t know what the jury will decide, but as of now, I am ambivalent. The states failure to investigate the scene properly is leading me to not convict him.
@@Creative-Chaos I’ve changed too. But I’m still leaning towards he was responsible but had it done. I don’t think he had time to do anything or clean up. But somehow he is part of it. I just don’t think he did it himself. The investigation was awful and so is the prosecution. I doubt he’ll be convicted.
Judge Manning can’t stand this woman!!😂
Manning is a national treasure ❤️
If Mr. Alexander doesn’t believe ‘closing the space’ and balled up fists are scarey, then perhaps Bigen and I should provide physical portrayals and then, after, fresh pants for Mr. Alexander.
Nice one! That lawyer was a piece of work. I wanted to smack the smug off his stupid face.
She said no, people. Wow. What a sparkling attitude Mrs. Peter’s has.
As a guardian ad litem and family law attorney, I do find that sort of controlling behavior (air tags) very concerning. The husband's behavior as well, however, suggests that there was a lot of ego battling and power plays going on--it is basic courtesy to knock especislly more so when tensions are high. It's hard to know full history of these two based on what we have heard, (with a caveat that the wife comes across as non credible in her testimony), but it's clear each side has enough money to keep this going and to fight over this poor little child stuck in the middle.
Really good and even handed comment. Toxic people in a toxic marriage, now torturing the child with a toxic divorce. Neither willing to put ego aside for the child.
It’s common for the fire department to install car seats, or at least inspect that you’ve done it properly if you swing by a firehouse. There are so many different brands/models & people don’t always do it properly. 🚒🚒
Judge Manning sippin' on a Buc-ee's cup. Love it. So Georgia.
I saw her DWI arrest a few nights ago. She had the same outfit on. She felt so entitled and so over the top! She was a newscaster in Atlanta and a few days later, she was terminated!
Sorry, I know your comment is 10 months old now but thanks! I have seen the arrest also and didn’t realise it was her. She was awful in that, so entitled and dismissive of the police. Thanks again!
Can you give link?
@@martyclark7537 hmmmm, sorry, it was months ago. It was part of ‘Karen’s getting arrested’ compilation.
I’m catching up after work but wanted to add, I’ve gotten to 1:24:28 of the video (not sure how it ends yet) but..all I can visualize when I watch her testify is Amber Heard (without the tears).