High Altitude Balloon 16
Вставка
- Опубліковано 24 вер 2018
- This was our second attempt too break the latex balloon altitude record. The balloon payload reached 125,579 feet. Combine weight of capsule and parachute was only 700 grams (1.5 Lbs.). The Balloon Used was a Hwoyee 1600 gram. The camera was Go Pro Hero 4 Black with a 5.4mm Lens.
- Наука та технологія
Dwayne Kellum, you are a living legend. Your work is most appreciated sir. Thank you.
terrific again Dwayne. Can't wait for the infrared, hope you all the best and Thanks again Dwayne.
I will be doing more with infrared in the future. I purchased a 1000nm filter that I will use on my next experiment.
17 and 18 will be up soon I'm working on the video.
Totally amazing footage Dwayne thank you so much for sharing.
No CGI here, it's so lonely up there
Wow so beautiful. Interesting how the temp fluctuates pretty wildly at times. And then the Balloon stalls for a few seconds and then continues. Really interesting. Thanks for sharing. Look forward to seeing you break the record.
Amazing video. Thanks for all the work you do.
The best videos in UA-cam, thanks for this great work
And keep up the good work Dwayne. Awesome and very interesting video 😎👍🌍🌎🌏
thank you for all your hard work i hope you never stop until you figure it all out
I'm so glad I stumbled upon this channel, (with help from a friend) keep up the good work, very interesting, Peace Brother ✌👍🙏
man your loons are much apreciated. keep em coming.
Thank you for all the balloon footage showing the earth is an obvious globe. Globe earth 4 life!
Yep, U-2 Pilots have noticed curvature at 70,000ft.
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2901372/Pictures-edge-space-Photographer-riding-U-2-spy-plane-captures-stunning-images-13-miles-Earth.html
Watch what curve? ur brain?
@@AlexZander688 A lie, abig lie. Distortion from the window of the aircraft makes a significant curve. By viewing the curve, Earth is bigger than UR-ANUS!
great work I also can't wait for the infrared thanks for all your hard work
you are a legend.. thaks for your time and your work
Well done Keep up the good work all the best from John in Texas
Question: Is the distance travelled figure the point to point (airline miles) distance between launch and landing, or the line of flight distance that the payload took from start to finish?
beautiful! lovely shots of local sun hotspots and reflections, and as always, God's gorgeous sapphire throne!
Awesome!!!
Much Appreciated.
Eye level always same = horizon don't down = FLAT PLANE. Thank you so much man
Accumulated Sense get a life homie. Acting tough on the Internet calling people name cause of opinions
word flat as f***
@@K1ngs4NDWR3TCH3S He should change his nick to Accumulated arrogant ignorancy...
J Preston
Eye level *CHANGES* the *VIEW* of the horizon when you look at it you mean?
It's sad that Dwayne has some excellent footage here and you lot still *SEE* a Failed Earth.
Perhaps there's a reason you all *AVOID* the channels that can *EXPLAIN* quite eloquently *WHAT* you are seeing here?
Here's a tip from me: SCALE. It's the one thing *MISSING* from your *'it's flat!'* war cry.
@@bluemarbleguy4365 explain, lollolo.
Thanks for showing the curve and proving the atmosphere has a pressure gradient that goes down as altitude increases as predicted by the effects of gravity. Thanks for supporting the globe !
EnergiaSim what's heavier?
1kg of polystyrene or
1kg of lead?
@///AMG No. Just no. Stop.
Tesla you are blind on the brain and on the eyes/ WAKE UP
great vid. Have you tried an infrared lens? That would be interesting as well. Awesome job as always. Thanks.
Wooo! Fantástico!
thanks alot Mr.Dawyne Kellum
How to make the camera not moving that much ? Maybe add weight / balance it ?
Can you also please tell us recommended package size in weight ?
The goal for this flight was to break the altitude record therefore the capsule had to be lite. The lighter capsules move around more than the heavier ones. The package size and weight will depend on what you want to accomplish on the flight. I'm working on a Gyroscopic stabilizer that I will use on a future flight.
Thanks as always brother 😎
Why does the altitude stop at 125008 for a few seconds along with the air speed?
+Dwayne Kellum hi, please you could send a balloon at night, I saw that you have already done, but you see only the top, plus you could put the pressure sensor? which mixes gas uses? thanks for the answers.
I will be conducting a night launch this summer with special camera equipment to record stars.
I cannot thank you enough for this video. I have seen others of yours as well but this one is truly remarkable. It appears that no matter the altitude there is only one perspective. The earth appears flat. Am I the only one who sees this? I mean, if the rate of curvature is 8" per square mile shouldn't it be quite evident at this altitude?
Any way to gett an infared mod on the go pro? Thanks for your time and effort in this important research. Much appreciated by many!
You can make your own filters
Yes, we will be sending two infrared cameras on the next launch.
@@DwayneKellum how about a rectilinear lens correction on that GoPro if someone bought it for you would you use it on your next launch?
Great as always, I wish the camera was pointed just a bit higher though the SUN was always just out of camera view or just at the top especially at the higher ALt.
Amazing video.I'm not sure if you can brake the record, because any balloon will popp once the pressure is 0.0.The weird thing is that temps. rises above 100K feet.Does the temp. rises at 100K feet also when you did night launches with no sun risen yet? Would it help, if you build balloon within the balloon?? So there is a pressure barrier and it may last longer, thus reach higher altitude.
Great video
Hi Dwayne have you ever thought to do a night launch to capture stars at high altitude?
Fantástico!
Donde esta el globito de tu compañero del dinero estafado a vuestros pobrecitos e ignorantes seguidores? No lo iba a lanzar el día 25? Ah no, que es mejor quedarse el dinero y hacer entrevistas estúpidas en la radio para seguir con vuestra farsa.
Sinvergüenzas sos pibe.
Por cierto, tu amo y señor Iru, dijo que la cámara go pro no distorsiona las líneas cuando cruzan el centro de la imagen, y en ese punto se ve CLARAMENTE la curvatura. Boom.
@@nasanchez964 lo cambio luego a octubre, pero otro canal amigo del sinvergüenza de Landucci aviso que evalúa pasarlo a Enero el lanzamiento.
Una más del estafador y vende humo de Planucci 😎
La mejor parte es cuando muestra la curvatura :D ua-cam.com/video/GQnXxvKiQz0/v-deo.html
Love it every time you put these out. Always a globe smash.
You genuinely think that all of this is earth? Like just that part is the entire earth? Like not shitting on your beliefs or anything, just saying, this is just a part of the earth, not the entire earth. If a flat earthers theory is correct, then we should be able to get a picture of the entire earth, in one picture, right or wrong?
Nope, U-2 pilots have noticed curvature at 70,000ft.
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2901372/Pictures-edge-space-Photographer-riding-U-2-spy-plane-captures-stunning-images-13-miles-Earth.html
Flat Earth FAILS, always!!
Fantastic program you've got going there! If you're not already a scientist, you'd sure make a great one! Keep it up? Have you thought of releasing a High Altitude Glider to have a platform with more time for experiments at altitude?
@Dwayne Kellum.....Have you ever launched a nite ballon on a full moon an got video of them moon? Would be a cool thing to see what it looks like at 100plus k altitude
Nice quality again Dwayne . noticed your gps gets stuck a lot and in a few other videos that it only uses very little satellites , is that antenna ok?
looking forward to the next one, hope you do the infrared again :D
The GPS has a internal antenna and the device doesn't have a place to connect an external antenna so it drops out a lot especially at higher altitudes.
I wish I was up there. Beautiful terra firma.
Do you have registration numbers for your balloons if I was to launch one in my area I would have to get one and get clearance
umm... does anyone realize this balloon has ben stuck at 125,415 feet and bouncing off the firmament for quite a while....
Sir. Can we tied the baloon in a spacial point?, please explain....
I'm sorry but I don't understand your question.
Very interesting experiments. Would it be possible to include a device that measures how level the camera is in real time? To my knowledge the horizon should drop significantly and noticeably at particular heights. A device that measures the level of the camera would be very interesting especially if an infrared filter was also used. Very cool videos, thanks.
2:37:00 WOW::: 125,500 ft==38 kilometers altitude, absolutely incredible!!! Thank you. That's four times the cruising altitude of airliners, and the temp back up to Zero-Centigrade from -60c at cruising altitude!!! This is the highest altitude private balloon launch that I recall. If you know of an even higher one, please post its title, or its link here, thank you. K.S.
Thanks again Dwayne, for confirming conventional science's understanding of earth
thats the curviest earth i have ever seen
So many chemtrails and chem haze obscuring everything. Chem clouds everywhere. Darn, anyway. Thank you for your diligent work. Thanks for sharing your talent and work. Wish I had an address (P.O. Box ?) I could send a donation to.
Dwayne following on with funding thing how much would a huge balloon like the one NASA use shown here ?
ua-cam.com/video/Lky4vT208_8/v-deo.html
Dramatic landing!
yes, and it broke one of the connectors for the sensors.
Dwayne Kellum need for more robust connectors then.
Also, in the next launch, can you switch the telemetry to metric units?
This is amazing info, thank you so much. I would love to see some kind of leveling mechanism on the camera so we can point out that at 120,000 feet the horizon is still at eye level. Even if the camera is moving around, when it shows level there will be the horizon right in the middle of the screen. Cheers!
Nope, U-2 pilots have noticed curvature at 70,000ft.
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2901372/Pictures-edge-space-Photographer-riding-U-2-spy-plane-captures-stunning-images-13-miles-Earth.html
Beutifoul!
@Dwayne Kellum - I just found out recently that you can get a ride to 20,000 feet on a sky diving plane in the valley for only about 20 bucks. It would be interesting to see what pictures you could get out the glass free open door with your low distortion lenses. I don't know though if they require you to have a parachute, especially to stand in the open doorway. Of course it wouldn't be from as high, but at least you could more easily control the direction of your pictures than with a balloon.
Thanks from Brazil ♥️🇧🇷
Wow .... Thank you...
Hello Dwayne! I want to know what software did you use to load the telemetry with the video. I use ZLog v7. Thank you.
I used Dashware version 1.7.37 the encoder is dated so I make a green screen of the video with gauge and than overlay it with Vegas Movie Studio Premium 15. I couldn't get Dashware version 1.9.1 to work in 64bit. You will need too create a data profile in Dashware for your ZLog 7 and customize the gauges you want too use. Dashware 1.7.37 only works in 1080p so if you shoot in 4k you'll have to encode you green screen video in 1080p than overlay that onto your 4k video in your video editing software.
@@DwayneKellum Thank you.
@@DwayneKellum now Dashware is FREE!!! Thank you for your tips Dawyne. We are doing our own HAB in Argentina in La Pampa.
@@DwayneKellum ua-cam.com/video/OQqKeUOfI2s/v-deo.html this guy is calling you a
swindler, and is showing your channel and your picture. Minute 16:44, in case you want to give him a strike.
www.dashware.net
Frame rate and spinning motion of the camera are responsible the "convexing" apparitions because, if you notice, as the slower the camera's rotational motion becomes the convexing disappears. It's a similar effect to how a fan blade, at a particular speed, appears to be motionless or even spin backward when recorded.
This is not at all how rolling shutter (The phenomenon you are referencing) works.
Which is probably why I said similar and not identical..
EmeritusE But it's not at all similar, rolling shutter would distort things that are perpendicular to the direction of motion, not parallel. How could rolling shutter cause the horizon to appear curved? How is this effect similar to rolling shutter? How would the fact that it takes time to register the information from each element on the sensor cause cause a flat line that is parallel to the direction of motion to appear curved?
EmeritusE 2:34:27 - no motion and the horizon is still curved.
Zack Freeman Um, both are image distortions caused by motion? Yes, the horizon is curved. It's curved because the earth is curved. But as you see in your example, it's not convexly curved. When the camera was falling, and consequently twirling, the image became convex. (1:48) Similar distortions effects can be seen with a fisheye lens when straight lines move through the visual field, regardless of motion, but that is not the case here as he is using a rectalinear lens.
Will you be attending the FE International conference in Denver?
No.
Dwayne Kellum Why Not?
I'm working.
Pauses video,
takes screenshot,
pastes into powerpoint,
draws straight line across horizon,
observes obvious curvature,
bangs head on desk trying to figure out how people claim that this is footage of a flat horizon.
Please, anyone... take 30 seconds to do this.
@Imminent Ok, provide proof that there is no horizon. Provide proof that water is concave. How does gravity work? Where is the sun? What is the moon? What are the stars? What powers the sun?
@Imminent Interesting claims... Can you prove any of them?
@Imminent You are asking why optical zoom doesn't work on earth? It does. You should do a little learning about lenses. You need to grasp the concepts of field of view and angular size. Why does the horizon drop below level when you gain altitude?
@Imminent you aren't seeing things. You are perceiving things. Measure the angular size of the moon at any time you like and compare. It is the same.
I have to say I have never heard the claim of a convex earth. How do you explain sunrise and sunset? (You can't say perspective unless you can describe its effect mathematically)
Also, you dodged the horizon question. Do you have a real answer?
Hey how far can we see are there some Mountains that you know an can show us i want to know it
thanks alot fot the videos are Great Work !
at burst altitude (125,579 feet) distance to horizon was about 477miles or 768kilometers from camera.
The blue mountains you see are the Sierra Nevada Mountains (Yosemite National Park). The golden hills are the Coast Range mountains. The ocean by the mountain is Monterey Bay.
Dwayne Kellum 477 miles, wow, in one direction. That means when the video spins 180 degrees we are seeing 477 again in the opposite direction, or 954 total miles. Wow , thanks Dwayne. This is close to calculations made in JTolans denoise infrared video where he maps a view of distant mountains at 600 miles from a plane at 35,000 feet asl. Double the view from the opposite side of the plane and total distance is 1200 miles. So flat. It is visually flat. Now think of this perspective is also in play, our vanishing point is up down but also right left. And perspective 360 degrees around us even at 1,000 or 1200 miles is circular, we will see curvature of horizon even on a flat plane, just imagine it as a big pizza. Our view only lets us see so far even from great heights.. thanks Dwayne great work.
This is my second video I'm seeing from you and I would really enjoy to get a kit very similar to yours but I have not been able to get the eagle flight computer but they are hard to find. would love to get some advice from you as to what i should get for a kit!
Have you talked with the company to find out when they will be available again? If you are good with electronics you can make something similar with Arduino or raspberry pi. Like this one. ua-cam.com/video/AOkDBxm4Myk/v-deo.html You can email me if you have more questions. chiwat63@gmail.com
Is it possible to go even higher than that and if so how much more? :)
Yes. with a latex balloon around 140.000 feet
Brother this is amazing. Hits electromagnetic dome at 125415ft (equals 9).
So if the whole balloon and payload was made from non-magnetic material...it could go through the EM field??
How do you conclude this Josh? Whats the logic?
Dwayne, I downloaded the highest parts of your video. I selected several frames that showed the clearest horizon line, that had the camera as close to level as possible.
I took them into photoshop and placed a grid on them.
Taking into account that barrel distortion will cause straight lines below and above the centre line to be curved toward the centre line. This is what I have found.
All the frames with horizon below the centre line are curving away from the centre line. Not by a huge amount, but quite clear against the grid.
What this indicates is that, despite barrel distortion, the horizon curves down...as one would expect from a large sphere at this altitude.
Brilliant footage and effort. You may want to consider a 360 camera next time
I have plans for a 360 camera later, but first I have other experiments to complete.
just noticed a scene in marvels runaways s01e07. a couple watching a sunset discussing atmospheric refraction he says 'thé sun is gone but we can still see it' hmm...
great vid i love it when u show the real earth i dont see the 'iss' or satalites
Holy crap!!!!...I didn't see any either!!!...Of course I also don't see planes circling airports from hundreds or thousands of miles away here on the ground but by your own moronic logic we should be able to see those from any distance because they're real...LMAO
Lol
What makes the balloon pop? It can’t be the temperature it is at 32 degrees. It is much cooler at 75,000 feet. Is the effect from pressure drop? Bubble wrap pops in a vacuum but not all of them. It is colder at 30,000 ft. Than 125,000.
increasing altitude = less atmospheric pressure. the volume of gas within the balloon remains constant. with less atmosphere pressing down on the balloon that volume of gas within the balloon expands until the balloon cannot retain it.
Wildman Fujiami would releasing the pressure help?
you would also be venting the very gas that is making the balloon rise.. only if the amount you vent is offset by the lessened gravity..
Wildman Fujiami nah, a sounding missile is enough to send his equipment at 60km
Wow the horizon is curved, fish eye lens or is it really curved?
I see a round table so it is flat table i dont realy now for sure
Really curved.
@@TheMarekduda no table here. If that was the entire earth, you'd be able to see every continent in the world and it all be in daylight at the same time.
Thank you Dwayne I find the work you carry out fascinating and awe inspiring.
The temp changes are significant and It's a wonder the NASA Astronots didn't wear shorts on the Moon lol
Can you tell what causes the balloons to burst please ?
To inflate the balloon, you need to fill it with so much light gas (hydrogen or helium), that the pressure inside it gets higher than outside. But as it climbs, the outside pressure drops gradually and the inside/outside pressure difference grows and grows. At some point, the material couldn't sustain it and the balloon pops.
Don't forget that at sea level the atmospheric pressure is ~10 tons per square meter (> 2000 pounds per square foot) and as you go higher and higher it slowly drops to near zero.
By filling it less, you could achieve the equilibrium at some altitude so that it doesn't burst. But then you don't get your equipment back ;-)
KUDr Thanks for explaining this using your brain. I've done so in other comments.
Have a greate day thx
Were you trying to show the curve of the Earth? Because that's what you did. Very nicely too.
Is there a curve?
Clearly yes.
@@zackfreeman8025 do you think you are a free man
flat's where it's at. where the curve? That's my name. I am a citizen, so I'm not really free. But, i'm happy with the trade-off. I choose to participate in society.
@@zackfreeman8025 interesting response
Beautiful as usual. Impressive altitude.
The horizon is curved as usual. Check it out: selliott.org/earth/dwayne-kellum-16.jpg
I’m curious about the air temperature. The temp drops as it ascends....gets the coldest at around 49k feet at -68F...then as the balloon rises the temp starts to get warmer. Finally at 125k feet, the temp is 28F. Air speed was relatively the same.
I've seen this pattern on a lot of the flights the coldest temp was -71.2 F around 52,000 feet and it warmed up to 32.5 about 125,000. at burst it was about 31.4F. I will be doing experiments on this on my next two launches.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_temperature#/media/File:Comparison_US_standard_atmosphere_1962.svg
Here is a plot of density, pressure, the speed of sound, and temp vs altitude.
Use a 360 cam
Where are all the stars and the other planetary bodies?lol
You guys are missing it every time the temperature actually increases after a hundred thousand feet that's insane that's why all those balloons pop there's really no way to keep them from popping you would have do you have the largest balloons made would like Google's not to mention you can't fill them up very full because that's the whole problem here when the temperature starts to increase the molecules will expand so much and with no pressure to the outside of the balloon that's why they pop because the molecules keep expanding and there's no pressure to keep the balloon from popping the only reason balloons don't pop down here on the ground is because of the intense atmospheric pressure... the weird part is you can increase temperature with pressure with increased pressure and it's just odd that after the temperature drops and it reaches 100000 ft that the temperature starts to rise....
Ryan wyrick I’m assuming it’s because of the helium/hydrogen and other light gasses trapped below the firmament.
That's not what a firmament is. The firmament is the gap between the ocean and the water in the sky, so we would be in the firmament. The real reason the temp increases is there is less atmosphere to block high energy particles from the sun, so heat transfered by radiation is stronger
Or the atmospheric pressure drops, increasing the pressure differential between the inside and outside of the balloon. This causes the balloon to expand until the tensile stress in the rubber reaches the yield point.
Rei The Raider we are not in the firmament, the Bible describes it as unmovable, and a solid object...”like glass”.
I've been tweeting this video all day #FlatEarth (dsfat) and asking why NASA doesn't show full flight footage with data to the people who pay for all those Balloons !
I'll keep tweeting your research because it is amazing.
Thank you
Thanks for getting the word out about these experiments.
You are very welcome.
Trade Pro SEO There are plenty of videos of rockets going from launch to orbit. You just choose not to believe they are real.
Zack I believe I still have the right to choose what I believe to be true ?
Trade Pro SEO You do, but don't you understand that if you simply dismiss information, then you will never be provided with adequate proof? I simply like to examine the logic, the specifics of why so much is determined to be "fake".
Eerily quiet up there.
Dwayne how high could you go with a balloon like this one NASA use ? ua-cam.com/video/HfPDRfohnic/v-deo.html
Can you give me your thoughts on the maximum a balloon could rise up ? The record on wiki is 173, 900 feet.
Discussions on twitter have resulted in the opinion that they can go no higher because of bouyancy. Do you agree with that ?
So no PSI = no more lift ?
At 2:27 min you can witness that this balloon has a speed of a 1000 mph and 70 000 mph arroud the sun and moving with 500 000 mph through space. 2 hour 27 min reveals the truth!!!!
nice work. please next time spot the moon during daylight and night.
Air speed MPH goes up when balloon goes up.
Great curvature. Almost zero atmospheric pressure. Must be close to the near vacuum of space...
I saw it but was expecting more to be honest at that height though it is hard to notice with the camera bobbing around. Would have been good to have it edited to a few single clear frames so it could have been measured. That will finally show the Flat Earthers the truth.
Glenn Wood I agree it’s not so noticeable. I suggested to Dwayne, to look into stabilising the payload. I think by extracting a few sample frames it would show the curve quite clearly. He got lucky this time, the upper atmosphere winds were not so bad.
Still searching for curvature? HA it's not there. Keep dreaming and believing your fake space NASA
@@sportydiver That's your problem. It's there in this video (although slight) and suddenly you can't see it. Keep believing in the Flat earth Fraudsters that are sitting there counting their income from their channels. They know the jig is up but they need not only the money but the validation of the few hundred supporters they've collected along the way.
As stunning as this is I doubt we will ever get to see the entire earth because these balloons just expand and pop once they reach a point were there's no more pressure, it would be cool if at this point you had some sort of technology installed that would take the camera to 900000 ft and beyond
Ultimate Tensile thats why somebody needs to do it live
Barron From The Future the balloon is still gonna expand and burst tho once it enters zero pressure, there's got to be some way to take the camera higher once this happens, balloons just don't cut it.
Ultimate Tensile sounding missiles. Neat piece of equipment, some of the big ones send payloads above 100km
Dwayne I never asked you this directly and it may seem like a really stupid question but do you believe the Earth is flat or do you believe it is a hovering ball of water hurling through space and unknown speeds
Dwayne Kellum indeed
Dwayne Kellum no problem
Dwayne Kellum And you don’t see the obvious curvature in many of your videos as a bit of a give away?
Dirkardo StEvergreen talking about the small curve compared to the huge curve NASA gives you?
12 mil já vi com aviões
Precisamos de algo em torno de 50 a 100 mil metros de altitude
A brilliant flight, in terms of a bit of home engineering. But, as with the others: You can see new surface features coming into view over the horizon as the altitude increases, which is a direct contradiction of FE ideas, and is predicted as a result of the horizon dropping in the globe model. And this video doesn't directly allow measurement of whether the horizon drops with height or not: There's no reference point, and the image moves up, down, round and all over the place. I can (and have many times) see that the horizon drops with height using observations of the pillars of the Forth bridges up the estuary from me, a telescope, and the sea defense wall near my town - that view doesn't bounce all over the place at least (not an engineering criticsim, I know how tough it is to keep one of these balloons stable, just pointing out you can't do direct horizon measurements without a stable reference & image).
If dwayne isnt a flat Earther i feel sorry for him.
LIKE 18 FAMILY FLAT EARTH BRASIL OK THANK BROTHER
Has anyone trapped the sun between two balloons it appears low and close in every video I've seen.maybe useing some high tec nasa GPS math to give some measurements. Or a camera with a sun filter.
well appearances are deceiving because real measurements prove that it is NOT close at all.
Right so you do this and you still believe in a flat Earth? Going by your logo and bio.
You need to google the scale of the Earth's atmosphere (in images), it will explain why you only barely see the curve at max altitude.
Have you compared the horizons seen at low altitude to max altitude? Focusing on the shots where it is as close to central.
Also, it you do believe in a flat Earth, then do you not believe in a dome and constant pressure? Most of them do. When clearly in reality there is a pressure gradient which is why you have and altitude limit and the balloon pops. I've done 2 launches myself and I really don't get how you can still be a flat Earther.
Take a ruler or something with a strait edge and place it on your computer screen along the horizon once the balloon is around it's highest in this video. The horizon is curved!
Why does the earth look flat?
It doesn't.
Hey Dwayne do you have the ability to get a gyroscope display on screen can you actually do that with a mechanical gyroscope on your payload and can you actually display it's properties? that would be so sick... don't know if you miss my comment I know I can get a little blunt and a little weird but I have cash to help you out and to donate for certain things that I think you're missing I know this is your show but I also know if you're trying to observe Earth for what it is you haven't done it yet okay and I'm saying that with all due respect that you know more about all of this stuff all of this technology needed for this then we do especially me but I do know how to observe the world with a camera seeing the world as close to the human eye would... and I will buy a rectilinear lens or any kind of GoPro correction lens that corrects your focal length to a proper rectilinear plane perspective view... I don't care if it's a couple two or three hundred dollars let's do this...
Hi Ryan I'm not sure about the gyroscope but I'll look into it. I have plans for next years that will be using better camera and lenses. Stay tuned.
Seems curve...
Gostaria de ver Balões mais resistentes
Esses parece balões de aniversários
Always rising to eye level. Always
NEVER
Nonsense! How do you tell where eye level is without any reference?
Hi Dwayne!
I bet you used a 7.2 mm lens this time.
i66.tinypic.com/30vls91.jpg
Still curvy horizon. Still as expected.
it could actually be a 5.4 mm lens.
The difference is so little.
I watched the video you linked about Max Igan.
I can say I agree with most of all he says.
it gits nippy up there..like 80 and 90 below zero..not very hamster friendly lol..makes you wonder about those ISS shysters bopping around in there shorts and T shirts for there Studio city Ca. camera's....mmmm.
Water in mass is always seeking and maintaining its level!!
Level means conforming to the curvature of the liquid parts of the earth's surface.
@@an.d.m.a Yes. Read, memorize and regurgitate everything that wikipedia tells you!! Water can never be PERPENDICULAR to gravity because gravity ITSELF has NEVER been DIRECTLY DETECTED ITSELF per CURRENT, FIELD, WAVE, BEAM, RAY or PARTICLE on the earth ever!! Google " what dont we know about gravity " and scientism states " HOWEVER if we are to be HONEST we dont know what gravity is in any FUNDAMENTAL way "!! That's because they have NEVER DIRECTLY DETECTED, IDENTIFIED OR ISOLATED GRAVITY ITSELF ON THE EARTH!!! NEMATODE YOU.
@@ramonortiz7462 you just memorised what a UA-cam video told you. Water does not seek and maintain anything. Water does not think. Gravity is the warping of space-time by mass which causes the apparent attractive force between objects with mass and the acceleration on earth of approximately 9.81m/s² in a vacuum. It is measurable, testable, repeatable and can be used to calculate loads, predict curved water of the tides in the oceans, the trajectories of objects on earth and the motion of heavenly bodies in space.
@@an.d.m.a You are guilty if the very accusations you make by plagiarizing wikipedia as you were TAUGHT i.e. programmed to do and you've excelled at it!! Water or as relative calls it agua is not malleable and CAN NOT be shaped upon its surface unless and I REPEAT UNLESS IT IS IN A CONTAINER LIKE A BALLOON OR BOWL AND ONLY I REPEAT ONLY THEN CAN IT BE SHAPED UPON IT'S SURFACE!! YOU HAVE PERFECTED THE ART OF IGNORANCE!! YOUR METHOD OF LEARNING/KNOWLEDGE IS TO HEAR OR READ THEN INSTANTANEOUSLY BELIEVE IT, MEMORIZE AND REGURGITATE IT!! I SEE YOU ARE HYPNOTIZED BY THE EDITS IN BRIAN COX'S DEMONSTRATION OF A FEATHER AND HAMMER FALLING WITHIN A VACUUM AND WHEN THEY RAN IT IN SLOW MOTION YOU WERE SOLD AND RIPPED UP YOUR RECEIPT!! IDIOT. ARE YOU VAGUELY FAMILIAR WITH CAUSE AND EFFECT!!? WHEN YOU HAVE AN ALLEGED I REPEAT ALLEGED EFFECT THAT IS CONSIDERED REAL THEN IT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY AN CAUSE OR HAVE YOU FORGOTTEN THIS!?? IDIOT. Are you aware that your precious fabric of space time i.e. gravity produced by the alleged mass of your giant spinning spherical water world space ball by the plagiarist Einstein or even the discarded version of gravity by Newton has never ever- not one IOTA- SCINTILLA or smithereen has ever been DIRECTLY DETECTED ITSELF!!? No? When you Google " what dont we know about gravity " you are greeted by the statement " HOWEVER if we are to be HONEST we dont know what gravity is in any FUNDAMENTAL way "!! Idiot! To date no man, INSTRUMENT or DEVICE has ever DIRECTLY DETECTED gravity ITSELF per CURRENT, FIELD, WAVE, BEAM, RAY or PARTICLE on the earth spelled E-A-R-T-H or HTRAE if you are dyslexic!! I implore you to review the definition of both PRESENCE and SUBSTANCE and you should understand that for any and all persons- places and things to be real they must I repeat and emphasize they MUST POSSESS PRESENCE AND SUBSTANCE!! IDIOT. GRAVITY ITSELF IS NOT REAL, TANGIBLE, AUTHENTIC AND THEREFORE DOES NOT EXIST ITSELF!! YOU ARE TAUGHT THESE LIES BECAUSE DOING SO WAS RELATIVELY EASY BECAUSE YOU ARE A VICTIM OF BEING SYSTEMATICALLY DUMBED DOWN!! ELECTRICITY ITSELF DOESN'T DO 1% OF WHAT WE ARE TOLD THAT GRAVITY ITSELF IS DOING EVERY SECOND I.E. PULLING, HOLDING OR CURVING EVERY BLADE OF GRASS, EVERY PARTICLE OF DIRT, EVERY GRAIN OF SAND, EVERY PERSON, PLACE AND THING TO THE OUTSIDE SURFACE OF A GIANT SPINNING SPHERICAL WATER WORLD SPACE BALL YET WE CAN'T DIRECTLY DETECT ONE QUARK OF GRAVITY ITSELF DOING A DAM THING YET WE CAN DIRECTLY DETECT ELECTRICITY ITSELF BEING A SUBORDINATE FORCE OR OCCURRENCE!! WHY IS THAT!!? EXPLAIN HOW WATER IN MASS I.E. LARGE BODIES OF WATER CAN BE CURVED AROUND THE OUTSIDE SURFACE OF SAID GIANT SPINNING SPHERICAL SPACE BALL BY A FORCE OR OCCURRENCE THAT HASN'T ONE IOTA OF PRESENCE OR SUBSTANCE OF ITSELF TO DIRECTLY INTERACT, ENGAGE OR ENGULF SAID WATER ITSELF!!? WATER IS NOT PERPENDICULAR TO ANYTHING CALLED GRAVITY BECAUSE THERE IS NO GRAVITY ITSELF!! IDIOT. ALL YOU HAVE ARE PARLOR TRICKS LIKE CAVENDISH OR GRAVIMETERS WHICH DO NOT DIRECTLY DETECT GRAVITY ITSELF BUT ONLY THE ALLEGED EFFECTS OR RESULTS OF GRAVITY!! IDIOT. ALLOW BUOYANCY TO DO ITS WORK AND LET THAT SINK IN!! IDIOT!!!!!!!!!
@@an.d.m.a It is becoming very hard to understand why people don't see the major problem when they are presented the following statement after you Google " what dont we know about gravity " the #1 hit/result is " HOWEVER if we are to be HONEST we dont know what gravity is in any FUNDAMENTAL way "!! Maybe the " FUNDAMENTAL " part is being falsely understood or defined!! The clearest reason why they admit they dont know what gravity is in any FUNDAMENTAL way is because gravity ITSELF has never been DIRECTLY DETECTED therefore it cannot be ISOLATED to study!! The reason why gravity ITSELF cannot be DIRECTLY DETECTED is because gravity ITSELF exhibits zero PRESENCE and SUBSTANCE of ITSELF! There is no CURRENT of gravity, no FIELD of gravity, no WAVE, BEAM, RAY or PARTICLE of gravity ITSELF on the earth nor emanating from or traveling to the center of the earth!! The speel was for things to fall or downward vector there must be a force to act upon it yet they must include that gravity ITSELF is not a force or sometimes is is called a weak force or even a FICTITIOUS force!! These fatalities are the exact reasons why scientism has discarded Newtonian gravity in EXCHANGE for Einstein's version being the alleged curvature of the fabric of space time which is allegedly created by the alleged mass of the earth weighing down on its surrounding space time that then directs all matter towards the alleged center of the earth but this version suffers the same nonexistent detection !! Is the alleged FABRIC of space time breaching our atmosphere and traveling threw the air down threw the earth's ground to its center!!? There has never been the direct detection of any body CONSISTING of PRESENCE or SUBSTANCE CURVING, HOLDING or pulling all matter towards the CENTER of the earth!! There would ABSOLUTELY require PRESENCE and SUBSTANCE of the alleged FABRIC of space time to introduce, interact, ENGAGE or ENGULF matter to then curve it back towards the CENTER of the earth!!! I would certainly ask what objects of great mass became present after the big bang that was able to curve the fabric of space time to then assemble the earth, stars and other planets thus providing mass to then curve everything back towards that planet or stars center!!? This is where you must answer and say that everything has gravity i.e. PARTICLES and is how all the dust, swirling gas and particles produced by alleged big bang clumped together so I would ask again and again,,,, ,, by what known MEANS of PROPAGATION did these particles employ to attract one another repeatedly!!? Conclusion!?? The liars of scientism will never DIRECTLY DETECT GRAVITY ITSELF PER CURRENT, FIELD, WAVE, BEAM, RAY OR PARTICLE ON THE EARTH PROVING THAT GRAVITY ITSELF IS FAKE!! FOR GRAVITY ITSELF TO ACCOMPLISH ITS WORK IT WOULD HAVE TO DIRECTLY INTERACT, INTRODUCE, ENGAGE OR ENGULF MATTER DIRECTLY TO PERSUADE OR DIRECT IT IN THE DIRECTION IT WANTS IT TO FOLLIW!! YOU CAN LIE TO YOURSELF BUT YOU WILL NOT LIE TO ME!