You are correct about the '32 having a more modern transmission than the Model A. The Model A transmission IS NOT SYNCHRONIZED. You need to "double clutch" or you will grind gears. This means press the clutch and back off the gas and put the lever into neutral, let out the clutch, push it in again and shift into the next gear, then let out the clutch in the new gear. This allows the transmission to engage the next gear, higher or lower, without stress on the dogs. With a synchronized transmission, as is on the '32 the rotation of the gears is set up so that one foes not have to double clutch. This is the way modern manual transmissions are are set up, although a few older ones, like were found on the Triumph Spitfire, first gear is not synchronized, so, on the rare occasion one wanted to shift down from second to first, one needed to double clutch to avoid "grinding the gears".
While you are correct, in saying the model a transmission has no synchros; you do not have to double clutch to shift smoothly. I have driven mine for almost 12 years now, Without having to double clutch. Take your time, don’t force gears, and let them slow down to the speed they need to be before engaging the next gear and you will be surprised how much like butter an old gearbox can shift like.
To those who say they don't HAVE to double clutch when shifting their Model A, You may be able to shift without double clutching, but you risk clashing the gears when you do. This may not be catastrophic any particular time you shift, and, if you manage to estimate engine speed exactly you may be able to snick the transmission to the next gear with minimal interference, but you may also damage the corners of the gear teeth, a tiny bit each time. Drain your transmission and look at what comes out. If there are any signs of metal bits or powder, that is a result of the gears clashing. So, while you may not HAVE to double clutch, it is a way to minimize the chances of damaging your gear teeth.
I drive my 31 coupe everywhere. Been on trip of almost 2000 miles. No problems. Never trailer her. So, what I’m trying to say, if the A is mechanically sound, they can be driven anywhere. Just like in the late 20’s & early 30’s when they were the best reliable car for the price. California from the east coast, no problem. Happy motoring.
Nice job showing how the starting and driving experience was simplified in the '32s. I'd like to read about the technical advances that made this possible.
You talked about the transmissions. The '29 had no syncro's. You had to double clutch to go thru the gears. Also, the '32 had a steering wheel lock. Way ahead of its time.
Either car is damn nice, love both i doubt i,ll ever own one! The old sidevalve engines are great Simple Long lasting But they inefficient they do not make much power!
By the way, the Model A design is based on a late 1910s Elgin but way smaller. The Model A was the smallest normal sized car (not counting things like the bantam or the American Austin). The sizes go as followed: Ford Model A, small car size Hudson, medium car size Cadillac, large car size Gardner, Extra large car size. Ford, Chevrolet, Maxwell, Briscoe, Dort, Templar, Norma, Essex. +50 Hudson, Nash, Pontiac, Stephens Salient, Studebaker, Climber, Buick, Chrysler, Moline knight, Willys Overland. +230 Cadillac, Standard, Haynes, National, Kissel, Stearns knight, Stutz, Lincoln, Packard, Pierce Arrow, Chalmers, Winton, Locomobile, Peerless, Elcar. +70 Gardner. +15 (other companies at this size) The Ford 1932 is classed at a medium sized car, whereas a Hupmobile (K-21)/Cadillac/Packard/Marmon/Lincoln/Stutz of 1932 would be a full sized and make it look quite small. What I'm trying to say is Ford was a underwhelming example of technology at the time, the Model A more so. Where a 1932 Ford went 60, a 1932 Pontiac went 70, a 1932 Stutz went 95, a 1932 Auburn went 110 etc. People often think Ford was best of the best and that no other vehicle looked that good (because most people have never seen any other vehicle to begin with.) so just keep it all in mind incase you ever look at this vehicle and think "is this the best?" like most Model A Ford owners.
@@enzomarin0 As he says even today ford is the everyday man's car. Not a special one. But Henry Ford made a lot. Assembly line. So any hard worker could afford a car.
If your model A won't do 60. Something is wrong. My stock one has hit 67. It would do 55 with a dead cylinder as well before being fixed. Great video regardless.
I have to agree. My ‘28 Tudor and ‘29 roadster are both bone stock and will go 55-60 if you push them. You just need a well sorted out carb and distributor.
From a safety point of view, the 32 had the fuel tank in the rear, with a fuel pump. This was far better than model A cowl mounted tank with gravity feed.
I LIKE THE LINES OF THE 32 BETTER THAN THE A. I ALSO LIKE THE 8 CYLINDERS BETTER FOR FREEWAY DRIVING. MY PREFFERANCE IS FOR THE 32. I ALSO LIKE THE SMOOTHER SHIFTING CAPABILITY OF THE 32.
The Model A has a ton of aftermarket support. You can buy a well sorted A and swap in a new synchronized trans and overdrive that will cruise at 60 mph getting in the mid 20s mpg and still have money left in the bank vs buying a clapped out '32. If it's only going to be a sunny Sunday and parade car, you can't beat an A.
Hold it. You can't compare a '32 Ford with an overhead valve conversion to a stock Model A. The horsepower difference would be much too great. That's 40 hp for the stock Model A vs what, 65 hp or more for that '32?
@@enzomarin0 no. The alternator and cam. Probably intake and exhaust. Who knows what has been done internally? And your constant alludetion the the idea that the v8 is supposed to be that much better is just wrong. I just don't think you know enough about pre war cars to try to come across like some experts opinion. Apples to apples the 32 may have a slight edge but compare it to a 31 sedan!
@@danesderelicts Well thats not modified. It keeps it running. Modified means like strange or custom things done to the car. The car looks basically stock on this one.
@@danesderelicts Well hes got the car , you don't. ^ What cars of these do you have, do you have some ? Show videos brother. See you. Good comments / notes.
@@enzomarin0 I used to have a Toyota supra 86. When you mentioned that sports car on video, yeah. Yeah there's a certain kinda feeling you get when you drive a sportscar
You are correct about the '32 having a more modern transmission than the Model A. The Model A transmission IS NOT SYNCHRONIZED. You need to "double clutch" or you will grind gears. This means press the clutch and back off the gas and put the lever into neutral, let out the clutch, push it in again and shift into the next gear, then let out the clutch in the new gear. This allows the transmission to engage the next gear, higher or lower, without stress on the dogs. With a synchronized transmission, as is on the '32 the rotation of the gears is set up so that one foes not have to double clutch. This is the way modern manual transmissions are are set up, although a few older ones, like were found on the Triumph Spitfire, first gear is not synchronized, so, on the rare occasion one wanted to shift down from second to first, one needed to double clutch to avoid "grinding the gears".
While you are correct, in saying the model a transmission has no synchros; you do not have to double clutch to shift smoothly. I have driven mine for almost 12 years now, Without having to double clutch. Take your time, don’t force gears, and let them slow down to the speed they need to be before engaging the next gear and you will be surprised how much like butter an old gearbox can shift like.
@@nagadsby9413 Try downshift a Model A without double clutching.
i dont have to double shift in mine except when im downshifting to second i just wait for the fly wheel to wind down
To those who say they don't HAVE to double clutch when shifting their Model A, You may be able to shift without double clutching, but you risk clashing the gears when you do. This may not be catastrophic any particular time you shift, and, if you manage to estimate engine speed exactly you may be able to snick the transmission to the next gear with minimal interference, but you may also damage the corners of the gear teeth, a tiny bit each time. Drain your transmission and look at what comes out. If there are any signs of metal bits or powder, that is a result of the gears clashing. So, while you may not HAVE to double clutch, it is a way to minimize the chances of damaging your gear teeth.
That engine bay and block of the '32 Model B are CLEAN!!!!
Yea it’s a good looking car
@@enzomarin0
You are so bad ass ! These cars are great how did you get these.
I drive my 31 coupe everywhere. Been on trip of almost 2000 miles. No problems. Never trailer her. So, what I’m trying to say, if the A is mechanically sound, they can be driven anywhere. Just like in the late 20’s & early 30’s when they were the best reliable car for the price. California from the east coast, no problem. Happy motoring.
Thank you yes I love driving it and it’s always reliable just sometimes I get worried about holding people up to much in it
@@enzomarin0
Holding people up, hm , pull to the side let them pass. They looking at the car so thats why they go slow. Be safe out there.
Nice job showing how the starting and driving experience was simplified in the '32s. I'd like to read about the technical advances that made this possible.
Thank you
I would be very happy to have either one of them
Me as well
Great comparison. Model a is easy to maintain and fun on back roads.
Agreed
Very good video !
Thank you sir
Love the Duster you had in the yard! Love my 28 Tudor. Great video
Thanks my buddys duster we’re doing a big block swap
Awesome man! Cool vid.
Thank you
Parabéns , excelente vídeo.
You talked about the transmissions. The '29 had no syncro's. You had to double clutch to go thru the gears. Also, the '32 had a steering wheel lock. Way ahead of its time.
No double clutching needed, if you let the gears slow down before you shift, they shift smoothly just fine if you are not in a hurry.
great vid bro!
Thank you
Interesting & fun video. You didn't include any explanation of the brakes - systems & techniques between the Model A & Model B.
That’s a good point I don’t a whole a lot about the difference just that there both mechanical brakes
Either car is damn nice, love both i doubt i,ll ever own one!
The old sidevalve engines are great Simple Long lasting But they inefficient they do not make much power!
Thank you
I actually like the truck the best.
By the way, the Model A design is based on a late 1910s Elgin but way smaller. The Model A was the smallest normal sized car (not counting things like the bantam or the American Austin). The sizes go as followed:
Ford Model A, small car size
Hudson, medium car size
Cadillac, large car size
Gardner, Extra large car size.
Ford, Chevrolet, Maxwell, Briscoe, Dort, Templar, Norma, Essex. +50
Hudson, Nash, Pontiac, Stephens Salient, Studebaker, Climber, Buick, Chrysler, Moline knight, Willys Overland. +230
Cadillac, Standard, Haynes, National, Kissel, Stearns knight, Stutz, Lincoln, Packard, Pierce Arrow, Chalmers, Winton, Locomobile, Peerless, Elcar. +70
Gardner. +15 (other companies at this size)
The Ford 1932 is classed at a medium sized car, whereas a Hupmobile (K-21)/Cadillac/Packard/Marmon/Lincoln/Stutz of 1932 would be a full sized and make it look quite small. What I'm trying to say is Ford was a underwhelming example of technology at the time, the Model A more so. Where a 1932 Ford went 60, a 1932 Pontiac went 70, a 1932 Stutz went 95, a 1932 Auburn went 110 etc. People often think Ford was best of the best and that no other vehicle looked that good (because most people have never seen any other vehicle to begin with.) so just keep it all in mind incase you ever look at this vehicle and think "is this the best?" like most Model A Ford owners.
Thank you I did know a lot of this I would have assumed a 32 is a full sized car
@@enzomarin0
As he says even today ford is the everyday man's car. Not a special one. But Henry Ford made a lot. Assembly line. So any hard worker could afford a car.
Need a top speed test for the Model B :)
Yea good idea I bet that one would do 75
@@enzomarin0Hell yeah let's see it!
@@TommyboyGTP
On freeways or highways you can do 75. It can be done there. I like these.
If your model A won't do 60. Something is wrong. My stock one has hit 67. It would do 55 with a dead cylinder as well before being fixed. Great video regardless.
Thank you on a flat surface i top out at about 50 it seems
I have to agree. My ‘28 Tudor and ‘29 roadster are both bone stock and will go 55-60 if you push them. You just need a well sorted out carb and distributor.
@@DucStewie
No way you got 2 of these things? What state ? Make videos of them!!!
@@Only.gmail_ 2?….I have 5. 😆 I admit, 3 are AA trucks which are 1 & 1/2 ton trucks so they only go about 40-45.
I love the 1932 phaeton. I have a 1931 Model A phaeton.
Very cool
From a safety point of view, the 32 had the fuel tank in the rear, with a fuel pump. This was far better than model A cowl mounted tank with gravity feed.
It's a matter of preference. Both are classics. The 32 is more advanced, with more hp, but both are in many áreas quite similar.
Very true
JUST THREE WORDS..."LITTLE DEUCE COUPE..."❣️
Yes
Hermosos vehiculos
K.buenas.makinas..tengo.ford.1932.con.motor.a.b.v8.
The model A didn’t have synchronized transmission.
I thought I said that, ones if the advantages of a 32
@@enzomarin0 relisten , nope ! Not a big deal .
@@jerrypeal653
Do you have one of these ? Too cool. These are amazing!
@@Only.gmail_ yes a 31 coup . I have a Mitchell transmission with synchronized gears in it .
I LIKE THE LINES OF THE 32 BETTER THAN THE A. I ALSO LIKE THE 8 CYLINDERS BETTER FOR FREEWAY DRIVING. MY PREFFERANCE IS FOR THE 32. I ALSO LIKE THE SMOOTHER SHIFTING CAPABILITY OF THE 32.
All good points
@@enzomarin0
He likes the 32 sedan.
I think that pickup looks so good ! Wow amazing!
The Model A has a ton of aftermarket support. You can buy a well sorted A and swap in a new synchronized trans and overdrive that will cruise at 60 mph getting in the mid 20s mpg and still have money left in the bank vs buying a clapped out '32. If it's only going to be a sunny Sunday and parade car, you can't beat an A.
There a great car
@@enzomarin0
What about an auto transmission swap, is possible? B c i don't like driving stick
Hold it. You can't compare a '32 Ford with an overhead valve conversion to a stock Model A. The horsepower difference would be much too great. That's 40 hp for the stock Model A vs what, 65 hp or more for that '32?
B MOTOR IS A GREAT ENGINE!!
Ford made 15 million Model T's on a assembly line before they built one Model A.
NO CONTEST, IT IS THE 1932 B MODEL ! NO BRAINER !
Good choice
@@enzomarin0
Wow a guy who actually answered the question! Sounds good see you! Thanks for video !!
No muevas la camara tan rápido, habla mas tranquilo y haz el vídeo nuevamente, para que aprendas .
The 32 is totally modified...
Just the head other than that stock
@@enzomarin0 no. The alternator and cam. Probably intake and exhaust. Who knows what has been done internally? And your constant alludetion the the idea that the v8 is supposed to be that much better is just wrong. I just don't think you know enough about pre war cars to try to come across like some experts opinion. Apples to apples the 32 may have a slight edge but compare it to a 31 sedan!
@@danesderelicts
Well thats not modified. It keeps it running. Modified means like strange or custom things done to the car. The car looks basically stock on this one.
@@danesderelicts
Well hes got the car , you don't. ^
What cars of these do you have, do you have some ? Show videos brother. See you. Good comments / notes.
@@enzomarin0
I used to have a Toyota supra 86. When you mentioned that sports car on video, yeah. Yeah there's a certain kinda feeling you get when you drive a sportscar
Cadillac and Chevrolet made v8 cars before than Ford , research