Seriously, I hung in there as long as I could, but about two-thirds of the way through, I lost track of where we were. Thank Zod we no longer use Roman numerals.
I am trying to figure what is the symbol for multiplication with Roman numerals. We commonly use * or × or do not write any in some cases like 7(2+3) means 7*(2+3). But how is that in Roman numerals? × is probably quite confusing with an x and also "no symbol" has allready interpration as ordinary sum if we are using Roman numerals. There has to be some algebraic symbols but I really cannot find any reference.
I don't know if this is because I'm genetically half Spaniard, but Roman numerals make way more intuitive sense to me in a theoretical way than the Indian numerals. Adding 0's to numbers makes no intuitive sense to my brain other than ten is more than 1 and hundred is more than ten. On the other hand, MMMMM makes it very clear there are 5 M's or five-thousand. Roman numerals seem more logical to me, whereas decimals look like empty symbol pushing.
@@kvandermeersch5753 Zero was called as Demon's number by Romans However Indian mathematicians were using it for ages. here is one video explaining multiplication based on Vedic mathematic. it is said to be 4000 years old ua-cam.com/video/cuAonFgXEtI/v-deo.html
Hindu mathematicians were using it for ages. here is one video explaining multiplication based on Vedic mathematic. it is said to be 4000 years old ua-cam.com/video/cuAonFgXEtI/v-deo.html
They are in fact hindu. They were borrowed by Europeans directly from arabs though so we likely didn't know of the hindu origin until later in history. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu-Arabic_numeral_system
I know this comment is old. But, here in the middle east we call it Indian numerals. Only the west call it Arabic numerals because they took it from the Arab speaking middle easterners. They took the western/andalusian/Maghrebi form of it.
@@abdelaziztobi4046 rakam al hind (Hind is India)... Arab traders learnt numerology and geo coordinates from India more than 2000 BCE.. Have a look at 4000-year-old multiplication method ua-cam.com/video/cuAonFgXEtI/v-deo.html
Seriously, I hung in there as long as I could, but about two-thirds of the way through, I lost track of where we were. Thank Zod we no longer use Roman numerals.
You are a very good teacher. I understood that.
Incorrect jim bass. It was incomprehensible, and the romans were badmen.
thank you, denver
This was very well done! :)
I am trying to figure what is the symbol for multiplication with Roman numerals. We commonly use * or × or do not write any in some cases like 7(2+3) means 7*(2+3). But how is that in Roman numerals? × is probably quite confusing with an x and also "no symbol" has allready interpration as ordinary sum if we are using Roman numerals. There has to be some algebraic symbols but I really cannot find any reference.
I’m doing this for homework🎉
Thx this was very helpful
Thank you!
I don't know if this is because I'm genetically half Spaniard, but Roman numerals make way more intuitive sense to me in a theoretical way than the Indian numerals. Adding 0's to numbers makes no intuitive sense to my brain other than ten is more than 1 and hundred is more than ten. On the other hand, MMMMM makes it very clear there are 5 M's or five-thousand. Roman numerals seem more logical to me, whereas decimals look like empty symbol pushing.
You can only have a group of 3 same letters maximum. 4 is never IIII but IV. So MMMM for 4000 is wrong. 4000 should be IV with line over it.
Hr explains this like 3 minutes into the video
Made my brain explode
You are brave!
Wow, so interesting
Good video. Very few people have taken on this explanation. Here's a question. What did the Romans do with zero?
The Roman numeric system is quite old and only useful for counting. It simply didn't have a zero, or negative numbers.
What zero?
@@kvandermeersch5753 Zero was called as Demon's number by Romans
However Indian mathematicians were using it for ages. here is one video explaining multiplication based on Vedic mathematic. it is said to be 4000 years old
ua-cam.com/video/cuAonFgXEtI/v-deo.html
Nice talk. Are you open for discussion?
Big learn
Incredibly complicated.. headhurts
Yeah, them hindus got it right.
Hindu mathematicians were using it for ages. here is one video explaining multiplication based on Vedic mathematic. it is said to be 4000 years old
ua-cam.com/video/cuAonFgXEtI/v-deo.html
@@andy260509 no
Hindu Numerals not Arab Numerals.
They are in fact hindu. They were borrowed by Europeans directly from arabs though so we likely didn't know of the hindu origin until later in history.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu-Arabic_numeral_system
Brahmi Numerals -> Hindu Numerals -> Eastern Arabic Numerals -> Western Arabic Numerals(The group that introduced them to Europe)
I know this comment is old. But, here in the middle east we call it Indian numerals. Only the west call it Arabic numerals because they took it from the Arab speaking middle easterners. They took the western/andalusian/Maghrebi form of it.
@@abdelaziztobi4046 rakam al hind (Hind is India)... Arab traders learnt numerology and geo coordinates from India more than 2000 BCE..
Have a look at 4000-year-old multiplication method
ua-cam.com/video/cuAonFgXEtI/v-deo.html
😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
Pagal bna raha hai M is not repeated more 3times more