@@HamRadio2 exactly I use it as base camp radio or in a Molle pouch on the side of my pack with an external hand mic and a CAATails antenna woven in the Molle. Great radio really for niche purposes but not for EDC.
My insignificant findings into a dry dummy load and on high power are: 146.000Mhz - 10.5 watts 147.900Mhz - 11.0 watts 222.000Mhz - 1.45 watts (after a conversion) 223.500Mhz - 1.10 watts (after a conversion) 432.100Mhz - 14.5 watts 446.000Mhz - 12.0 watts This was done on a khaki coloured AR-152 with the 1.25 meter conversion.
@@DMF716 With as low power as the radio puts out in that band, you must be relatively close to a repeater for it to be effective. The paintball teams love it for simplex, though.
Funny story: the Harris PRC-152 this is copying only outputs 5 watts across all bands. Sure the 5-6w you saw is below what's advertised, but 5w is more than sufficient for the role the real 152 is employed in. As many have already stated, this is for those who want the baofengs capabilities in a package that looks close enough to an actual PRC-152 but is cheaper than the TRI clones and easier to obtain than the heavily restricted and very expensive ITAR prohibited item real Harris 152s are.
The Harris radios have much better receivers and front-end filtering than these radios. Transmit power isn't the only thing that makes your radio useable over longer distances.
The reason I'm even looking at one of these is it's water resistance vs the normal UV-5R's lack of water resistance. How much is one of those PRC152 radios? I tried looking it up and I couldn't find any on sale immediately.
@@Sophistry0001seems theres some missing information on your end. To answer your question bluntly, try $4,000. You can’t buy one however. It’s restricted due to its military encryption. You could try and fine one with its encryption removed however, there’s not much more functionality you’d get from that though than some higher end radio for like $500-$1000
@@jki808 Good to know. Why can't we have encrypted radios? We have encrypted everything else on computers. You can send encrypted digital over analog with a phone app and a cord to plug into the radio, what's the big deal?
Ok, I have more info on the AR 152. It is superior to the Uv8HP.. The sound quality of the speaker is far superior. The Abree antenna is also superior. The display is way better for my old eyes. The buttons are way better for big fingers. The battery is a big bonus. I really like mine. The small Baefeng feels like a toy.
100% accurate! That's why I bought it. And seeing over 9 watt output is a plus with a dummyload. The stock antenna attached I'm seeing 13.6 watt output! That's double of any baofeng that not 8 watts or higher.
In order to see full output power, these radios must be supplied with 9vdc at the battery connector. The batteries do not provide full voltage. These radios are built with Airsoft enthusiast and military recreations in mind. That is why folks buy them at $100. There is no belt clip, as Abbree provides milspec web gear for them. They also provide foldover antennas other milspec replicas. A forward observer mic is also available. This is a crossover product. Not just for hams.
I have one. It is mostly just a big FDE Baofeng. I think the biggest hit to its tacticoolness is the lat of waterproofing. I like the battery life and the kit I bought came with the antenna in the video and a big folder. I think the only thing I have issue with in this video is your quoted price. The AR152 is $69 (so you can probably get it cheaper) and my kit with every accessory available was still like $100.
UV5R with extended antenna and 3 batteries - $100-110 AR152 - $86 today online I'm not seeing the problem with the cost. If it has any water resistance or increased ruggedness then it comes out ahead for the price.
At the time of this recording, the radio was $120. I was actually more disappointed with the low power output. Also I'm not sure how much faith I'd put in it being "water resistant"
I like mine: -larger, easier to read screen -fewer buttons -larger buttons/control knobs (easier to manipulate when wearing gloves) -ability to set different backlight colors for transmit & receive -a little more water resistant (no external battery contact points); would like a plug for the power cable's barrel input connector but water-proof tape works -fits well in designated radio pouches -feels solid, nice & chonky -will probably buy another despite having a couple UV-5Rs Overall, the review was helpful. The video provided information I was seeking 👍
It's on Amazon today for $70, no USB charger. The lack of a plug over the charging port means it definitely is not weatherproof (except on sunny days in the Spring and Fall). I've heard the stock antenna for this one is better suited on the -5R, though any antenna other than what it came with would be. Still too expensive for LARPing and cosplay (which applies depends on how old you are).
I do like My AR152 Radio I have used it in the field a ton and Most of that was During camping in a few different Forests and I was able to reach repeaters over 10 miles away with no issues and even repeaters 80 miles away with no issues just a small amount of static I think its a great Radio for the price if you get the Full kit with all the accessories and the holster case for it 19:00 @Ham Radio 2.0
Well. Sort of a hit piece , my humble opinion. I purchased one received yesterday. Same model. My findings: First, read the directions . Specifically, states charge 1st . Or... damage to radio is possible. Battery needs to be used and FULLY DEPLETED several times for Optimum operation. AKA READ DIRECTIONS FIRST. I my findings. Are 9.57 watts on 2m. 6.43 on 17 cm high power mode. I also purchased on Amazon. $89.00 . My package included. 2 antennas one is a fold over type.. Programming software package. Vehicle plug charger. USB charger. A very well constructed 19:05 belt case . Wall charger. Microphone / speaker. Received good reports .. Rule 1#. Read directions. Out..
The first editions of these had some issues, low transmit mic gain mainly. The newer version (the last few months) have good sounding audio, it’s a large relatively east to use and program once you learn how to keyboard program it, It has good loud receive audio and with the larger display and backlit keypad it’s easier to use for those with big mitts. Internally it’s mostly a clone of a UV5R late model as far as operation and functionality, almost identical menus and features. They come in wanna be commando Army Green, Tacticool Desert tan and Black for those of us that aren’t wannabe Mil-Sim larper closet commandos Testing on my IFR120B service monitor it’s within 100hz on being exactly on frequency on both UHF and VHF, the RX sensitivity is very good at -124 for 12 DB SINAD, TX power is actually about 8 watts on both UHF and VHF, TX deviation is just under maximum specs, 2.4 KHz on narrow band and 4.6 KHz on wide band. Actual testing on the air compared to my APX7000, 8000 and XTS5000 radios which are $400 to $4000 on the used market, the 152 has virtually the same range as the top tier PS rated radios! The 152 does suffer front end overload at Comms tower sites that the PS radios are more immune to so it’s not a great🎉 Comms tech radio for site/systems work. It build quality is pretty darn good for a $70 radio that covers VHF and UHF, no where near as rugged as a PS rated radio but it’s $70. Battery life is very good, it lasts for several days of average use, spare batteries are available in all 3 colors for $30 from Amazon. While it’s no public safety rated radio IMHO, it’s very well worth the $70 for what it does and what it is.
That's a good break down. My opinion having a radio for coms is more important than having nothing. I'm new and trying to evaluate the best options. Thanks for sharing.
Could you post this on face books Baofeng for Beginners? I just posted my thoughts and what I found on mine, but all the haters wanted what you did to see. Maybe it will shut them up, seeing it isn't a splatter matter radio. Thanks
L3 Harris AN/PRC-152 replica. These and SINCGARS are commonly carried in a pack. Soldiers don't use belt clip devices. The PRC-152, as long as I have used it, has never had a belt clip. There is even a portable coder/programming device available for its competitors. Also a replica. (KDU/keypad display unit). It has a PTT function built in.
Big difference. AN/PRC-152 is of course a hand-held. SINCGARS, which I operated for the Marines, was not necessarily a 'man-pack' we also used vehicle mounted models. Another difference is the original SINCGARS was fielded in 1988, the AN/PRC -152 in 2005. Tech is substantially different as is capability. SINCGARS also used a KYK device for loading crypto and the SOI ( frequencies, callsigns etc). The SINCGARS was capable of frequency hopping on its own. To integrate a 152 into a SINCGARS net, an encryption key has to be programmed into the device itself.
It is big but the battery life is amazing. Monitored 2 repeaters and one MURS Channel for 96 hours continuous. Need to work o. A test plane for transmit and monitor. From my point of view this is a good radio. I did change the antenna and seems to work better.
AR does stand for amateur radio (just looked it up) and the military “nomenclature” (as we call it) is the AN/PRC - (input model number). AN/PRC (Army and Navy Portable Radio Communications if I remember correctly)). I used to repair these when I was active duty Marine Corps. Medically retired 2862 (Communications Maintenance Chief) here.
I have made a primitive video showing how to add 1.25 meters to this transceiver. This was done on a salvaged camera that I found and bought a few things for it.
Just got 2 from AliExpress for 39.00 dollars each with 2 data cables. Took 5 weeks to it delivered but I got it with no damages, very well wrapped and protected.
11-19-2023, 11:39PM, PST : I received my from Amazon for $69.00 I use it as a scanner to monitor the Los Angeles County Fair Department. Outstanding piece of equipment for using it for this purpose. I am so digging the long battery life. I also purchased a KENMAX 400-470MHz UHF Flexible Spring Walkie Antenna. It's much shorter and works much better than the stock antenna that you receive what this unit. I'm using it for receive only. 🐢 👍 🐢 😀
The 8.4V on the wall plug shows that the lithium ion charging chip is in the wall adapter so it is actually not a power supply but a charger. I find those USB chargers taking the 5V to 8V quite useless as it will fry the usb port at some stage. Greetings from Uganda and thanks for you informative videos.
Im going to buy one, because I like bigger radios. The fact it doesn't contain a belt clip sucks, but wont stop me from buying it. Baofeng knocked this one out of the park. I love it!
Knocked it out of the park? Perhaps a foul ball that flew backwards over the batters box and into the street then run over by a garbage truck. Can bet bigger battery for UV5R for fraction of the price that will make the radio bigger. I'm quite certain this radio has no water IP rating.
Ill have to look up the actual brand of holster for this radio, but it is nylon ADJUSTABLE and has a very solid hasp clip. Attaches to the belt vertically or horizontally and if you do need to get to the radio, there is a thumb break in the front of the holster after you disconnect the clip. I like this radio too. So far it has worked in areas my UV 82 wont.
I bought one through Ebay. It came with every accessory including the molle pouch which btw is fairly well made. What makes the radio a hit for me is the sound quality and the fact that it is LOUD! A great feature with hearing loss. I also like the large keybad and screen. As far as belt clips go, I've broken almost every belt clip on my other 4 baofeng radios, so for me the pouch is far superior. One last comment. The current version is 15 watts. I don't know what the real output would be, but it will be much better than the older 10 watt version.
If anybody actually wants a good replica for a Falcon III they need to look at TRI or TCA PRC-152s. They interface with most Falcon accessories and have far better displays and power outputs. I'd love to see you review one of those and compare it to this one, Jason!
Glad I happened upon this video and especially your post. I purchased the TRI AN/PRC-152a and I have a genuine Harris KDU and cable, and apparently they're not compatible. Any clue about this setup? People complain that the TRI KDU is plastic-y feeling, and their complaints have no merit, because the original Harris KDU is plastic as well. I have the quad band version.
@@aldonalexander7178 Apples and oranges, I own one of each, current late 2023 release radios. They’re both built well, heavy aluminum housings, however the TRI On/off/volume control feels a little flimsy to me. Neither came with a manual and they’re hard to find accurate manuals on the net. The TRA has better RX audio but weak transmit audio, the TRI the opposite! Tinny RX audio, and great TX audio, go figure! The TRI concentric switch has three positions, companded audio, standard audio and scrambled RX TX audio. This is not documented anywhere! I was about to send the POS back until I found out I had it in the companded mode which makes the RX audio even more tinny and distorted. The companding feature in the menu doesn’t work at all. The Vol and concentric control on the TRI feel cheap and kinda sloppy to me, the TRA controls feel tighter and more robust. The TRI can’t be programmed by a PC, the TRA can, you’ll need the software and the side connector programming cable. They’re different from each other and there is definitely a learning curve figuring out the keypad programming without a manual, and I’ve found the ones on line are about 75 percent accurate. The main issues as far as programming goes are, the TRI has 128 channels, AKA and has a Baofeng’ish menu structure. No channel groups or zones within those 128 channels, The TRA has 8 groups of 16 channels each, the biggest PITA with the TRA is when using PL/CTCSS it’s either full RX/TX PL or csq, you cannot separate for TX only PL or cross coded PL tones for RX and TX when keypad programming, however PC programming allows separate RX TX PL codes and TX only PL programming, very frustrating as if you need a TX only or cross coded PL channel you’re stuck with PC programming! The Menus are significantly different between the two radios, the TRI is very similar to a Baofeng, the TCA nothing like Baofeng Like many Chinese radios the firmware is a little buggy and twitchy, and a few menu items either work strangely or not at all. For direct radio to radio or a single full PL repeater both are fine, the keypad programming PL limitation of the TRA is frustrating! Proof that the engineers that wrote the firmware aren’t very radio savvy, hopefully that will change. The other issue I’ve noticed with the TRI is it can be configured to use either the top control for volume or the top side buttons, the top control make sense to me BUT for some reason that causes some receive audio distortion at lower volume levels, using the side controls for volume the distortion is gone, another design problem! It’s not very bad and not everyone would hear it I’m guessing. One more thing, the TCA has a longer squelch burst at the end of a transmission than the TRI, it’s not objectionable. I understand the TCA is an SDR type receiver, the TRI more of a “standard” superhet receiver, both are very sensitive, about -122 on my COM-120C service monitor, transmitter power is about 7 watts output with a charged battery, battery life is great, about 24 hours of mostly receiving and some transmitting. Overall I like both radios but I do wish they’d do a better job of getting the firmware and features right the first time!
I have this in black.use it for Fire/LEO work. This radio is a BEAST. Loud audio, very well lit screen and keys and long battery life. the only issue I have is the long antenna and I substituted it with a 450 mhz stubby(I dont use the VHF side of this radio) and it does well as well. The kenwood lapel mic fits and functions. There are several material carrying cases for this radio as well ranging from a pouch and strap to an adjustable holster type case. I like it but it is big in the hand. Past that looking forward to getting spare battery on those long weekend shifts.
@@P25AES This guy is obviously a whacker volunteer. Whoever holds the license for the frequencies he's using is technically liable for FCC civil forfeiture from him using non-type approved equipment on their station.
I don’t own this one, but have a small collection of other Baofengs. My take on this model is like yours Jason. This model is just for show. If they wanted to make this one more suitable for the game players, they should have upgraded the speaker/mike connector. I own a couple of the Btech triband HTs. So far this is the best of all the Baofeng variants when you add the Nagoya triband antenna and the 3800mah battery. WB5NOE
If this was proven to be submersible, shock proof, weather proof etc I can see this being applicable for actual field or tactical use. They didn't even do that so it seems tactical only applies to it's aesthetics. Then again there are plenty of UV5Rs in use in Ukraine that also have none of those features.
I get one a few weeks ago, more tacticool than functional, needs to buy a new antenna, its more for the use of airsoft than ham, but its good to get a molle pouch mount it on your tactical backback and use it for aprs
Okay, as a user of HT's, I even have 2 Baofeng HT's and two TYT HT's. Here is something I have learned. When testing SWR and Power. Set the frequency to 1466.000. Since that is dead center in the middle of the 2 meter band. Remember folks, the higher the SWR the lower the power will be. Oh and you will only get the full power on one frequency.
The radio should still be putting out near 10 watts. For the radiated power to be as low as 5 and 6 watts the SWR would need to be in the ballpark of 5:1.
I bought both the bf-f8hp and the ar-152 which are allegedly the same guts...NOT! Side by side scanning, the ar is superior even when switching antennas. You must have gotten a bad one. AR is certainly more powerful than the bf-8hp They are very different units.
Dude. I know your video is a year old, but these even a year ago were 69.99. Today they are 69.99. You have to look at the packages that this radio is with. This radio is unlocked as well. Its a great radio. Big buttons, big screen, and huge battery.
At the time of this recording, it was the price I said in the video. Also it doesn't output the power that it advertises so it doesn't seem like a great rig to me. Instead get the Harris PRC-117
I actually just bought one for a review as well for SHTF, Survival, etc. I actually like it for the battery mainly. I can't wait to see your thoughts I will hold off watching yours until my review is done and see how we compare :) Love your channel and you inspire me every day!!!!!!
Mine registered 9.8 watts on high setting Maybe you didn't do it right Oh you got a bad radio Mine also came with a 4 foot collapsible antenna And it transmits a good 10 miles easily Also mine for that price came with two radios not one And it also had battery pouches specific to that radio with Molly attachments on the back
Even though you don't recommend the radio, would you recommend the antenna? I've been considering that type of antenna for my UV-5R cause it looks sturdier than say the Nagoya Whip antenna and longer than the stock Baofeng plastic antennas. Also, do you know if the AR-152 antenna is compatible with the UV-5R?
TACTICAL is out the window already because that charging port is open and exposed so as soon as it gets wet its gonna short out. No replaceable battery means if it dies in the field you can just change to a fresh battery. My guess is its UV5R in a big case with bigger battery.
I would be inclined to keep my UV5R, with the belt clip and hand held antenna in my pocket. It is slimmer than a pack of cigarettes, at least as far as I remember, not being a smoker. The green one seems more of a gimmick than an improvement.
Military carries those radios in a radio pouch, not on a belt clip. But for civilian use i could see a belt clip being okay, probably would be prone to breaking though with how big the radio is. 🤷🏻♂️
You said the antenna is 25.5 mm long at 3.40, isn't that mat in cm? Maybe my hearing is going, sucks getting old. Thanks for the video on the signal generator, I purchased it and tuned the old am radios.
I use to have those rubber duck antennas on my Baofeng UV-82 radios and I couldn't figure out why the radios had very short range. I finally tested the antennas and I had very high SWR's on both radios. I tried some other antennas but I finally found an antenna that worked well. It's the Abbree 38" tactical antenna. I was able to get my SWR's down to 1.2. This greatly improved my range on both radios. PS. I was thinking about getting one of those AR-152's. Not anymore!! Thank you!!!
I only paid $84.99 for one on Amazon, they delivered it in two days. I paid $169.99 for two radios. Very good construction, looks great but weighs 4.44 pounds per radio. Have not taken them out in the field yet.
Too bad W&W associates probably no longer carry’s belt clips and mounting pad with a high power adhesive. These were great for some of the earlier radios that had zero provisions for a belt clip. Might try charging the battery for a day and redo the power output test. I have found Amazon's pricing to be about 15%+ higher than direct sales from other sources.
You can even get a Camo UV-5R with Camo extended battery. Tacticool sums it up, I’d say! Great for Airsofters but that’s probably about it. Great video! 73’s from the U.K.!
So my wife bought a couple of these for us. We dont have any experience. We just wanted a way to talk without cellphones. About how far away could we be and still talk?
Depends on terrain, if you are on VHF or UHF, and what power you transmit at. My wife and I have talked 28 miles apart on VHF 146.520 at 5 watts while we were on opposing peaks of a mountain range. After getting off the peak we lost comms. In most common terrain you should be able to get a mile or two, sometimes longer, often times shorter if trees or hills get in the way. When you get into repeaters that’s a whole new realm of possibilities.
First found out about these via Ringway Manchester. I'll add one my collection if price and availability gets better here in the UK. I really like the look of it. 73 M7TUD
I bought mine for $60 same accessories as yours minus the usb cable. No belt clip was the first thing I noticed. Programming software is the next challenge.
Use CHIRP programming software. Do the initial download from the radio to CHIRP using UV-5R setting. I programmed mine this way and it works perfectly.
Add the term Special Forces...Tactical...Operator...Navy Seal, or a similar term to any item which normally retails for $25.00, and the price doubles or triples.
@@HamRadio2I know Armalite Rifle it's the First Developer To have ever Made The Ar-15 interesting Conversation Change From Assault Radio TO Billy clubs and mag lights to Weapeons Aren't we missing knives Bro 😂
I was going to buy this radio until I saw your video I changed my mind I can't believe they get away with lying if it's States 10 w or better thank you Jason 👍
I returned because I finally got a green AR-152 to test. I am not sure if the khaki one I had to test was a factor freak, or if they are made slightly different. But I got very similar results to the video with the green one. It was only slightly higher wattage. I would like to see if another khaki one coming in and another green one coming in will have the same results. A black one has not come in for me to programme.
It's "tactical" because it's VERY durable. Mine has been dropped on concrete from 10 feet, and pummeled with rain, while bicycling. It isn't IP-rated, but it IS quite robust and resilient, as my experience demonstrates. The battery lasts a very long time. It's easy enough to test whether it is really 1.2 ah. You won't find another HT with ~ 8W high TX power this robust for the price, which is now ~ $70. Sure, it capitalizes on the "tactical" marketing craze, but frankly it IS a great radio for tactical operations such as SAR, Skywarn, etc. It does not scan very fast. Amazon and other secondary markets always exaggerate the output power. Actual low power on these is ~1.6W on low; ~ 5.5W on medium; ~ 7.5-8W on high. If one is going to do a purportedly critical review of a dual band HT and is suspicious of the claimed power output, with all due respect, an MFJ wattmeter is not a credible measurement device for that purpose. A belt clip would be useless on a radio of this size and weight! There are green, black, and camel colored Molle and belt attachable lightweight cases. I have mine strapped into the side of my tactical backpack. I must respectfully dissent from your opinion. Go ahead and rely on a UV-5R as your primary operational HT if you like. That's rather like jumping from an aircraft with a parachute made out of a space blanket.
@@HamRadio2 Ah understandable, I was just curious if the drop in price could warrant it, but everything I’ve seen agrees with you. Thanks for responding, loved the info!
Marketers sell the story of a products price, some folks will buy that story up even though the 30 dollar product is the same as the 120.. Mah batteries increase price slightly. Good video. 👍
@hamradio2.0 Hello Shannon, This is Olivia from Baofeng support team. The output power will be affected by various factors; however, some dealers will appear to misrepresent the output power. Also, the AR-152 radio is a customized model for our dealers, and we suggest you can confirm the output power of the radio with the seller again before purchase. Thanks for your understanding. If there's anything else we can help with, feel free to contact us. Regards, Olivia Baofeng Support Team
I remember when Handies were very expensive ,Icom kenwood Yaesu Alinco , today radio are a steal , the quality is not the same but the battery life is way better , and what's a real good expensive radio with a short battery life , I prefer the longer battery life , I remember paying $600 for a Icom W2A my dream radio , a top of radio on its time , and way ahead if its time too , but the battery life for such a radio sucked . I know the brands I mentioned above are suffering with these Chinese radios , but thier battery life puts them on top for out door use , specially when transmitting on simplex on high power . That's my take on hand held radios of the past and the future. 73s
It’s designed specifically to fit in PRC 152 radio pouches. You aren’t supposed to carry it with a belt clip.
I thought it was supposed to be pared with a wide band PRIK E8 with the extra padding to keep I warm in cold climate.
Mine came with a pouch
Bone head review from this guy reviewing radio. Didn't read directions 1st. Moran.
There is no belt clip because it is meant to be carried on your chest rig, plate carrier or battle belt. Belt clips are most definitely not tacticool.
Who'd want this bulky thing on a chest rig? Maybe a battle belt, or maybe on your back in a molle rig
I'd rather carry 4 mags in the real estate this piece of hot garbage would take up on a rig
@@HamRadio2 exactly I use it as base camp radio or in a Molle pouch on the side of my pack with an external hand mic and a CAATails antenna woven in the Molle. Great radio really for niche purposes but not for EDC.
That antenna will put your eye out carrying it on your chest
Check out any CCT or TACP loadout and you'll see the PRC-152 on the plate carrier, not on a belt or on the back.
Not sure it's a worth it, but they are down to $70 now. It's also worth noting it's designed to be used in a pouch, not on a belt.
I'm ordering another one out of Homg Kong. Less than 2 weeks delivery. And at time writing only $56.00
Reviewer is a bone head, didn't read directions 1st.
My insignificant findings into a dry dummy load and on high power are:
146.000Mhz - 10.5 watts
147.900Mhz - 11.0 watts
222.000Mhz - 1.45 watts (after a conversion)
223.500Mhz - 1.10 watts (after a conversion)
432.100Mhz - 14.5 watts
446.000Mhz - 12.0 watts
This was done on a khaki coloured AR-152 with the 1.25 meter conversion.
Well, I'm not going to bother with the 1.25 conversion
@@DMF716 With as low power as the radio puts out in that band, you must be relatively close to a repeater for it to be effective. The paintball teams love it for simplex, though.
Funny story: the Harris PRC-152 this is copying only outputs 5 watts across all bands. Sure the 5-6w you saw is below what's advertised, but 5w is more than sufficient for the role the real 152 is employed in. As many have already stated, this is for those who want the baofengs capabilities in a package that looks close enough to an actual PRC-152 but is cheaper than the TRI clones and easier to obtain than the heavily restricted and very expensive ITAR prohibited item real Harris 152s are.
The Harris radios have much better receivers and front-end filtering than these radios. Transmit power isn't the only thing that makes your radio useable over longer distances.
The reason I'm even looking at one of these is it's water resistance vs the normal UV-5R's lack of water resistance. How much is one of those PRC152 radios? I tried looking it up and I couldn't find any on sale immediately.
@@Sophistry0001seems theres some missing information on your end. To answer your question bluntly, try $4,000. You can’t buy one however. It’s restricted due to its military encryption. You could try and fine one with its encryption removed however, there’s not much more functionality you’d get from that though than some higher end radio for like $500-$1000
@@jki808 Good to know. Why can't we have encrypted radios? We have encrypted everything else on computers. You can send encrypted digital over analog with a phone app and a cord to plug into the radio, what's the big deal?
@@Sophistry0001it's illegal in America.
Ok, I have more info on the AR 152.
It is superior to the Uv8HP..
The sound quality of the speaker is far superior. The Abree antenna is also superior.
The display is way better for my old eyes. The buttons are way better for big fingers.
The battery is a big bonus. I really like mine.
The small Baefeng feels like a toy.
100% accurate!
That's why I bought it. And seeing over 9 watt output is a plus with a dummyload. The stock antenna attached I'm seeing 13.6 watt output! That's double of any baofeng that not 8 watts or higher.
It’s definitely a great radio price is down to 69$ now I don’t think it can be beat for that price
In order to see full output power, these radios must be supplied with 9vdc at the battery connector. The batteries do not provide full voltage. These radios are built with Airsoft enthusiast and military recreations in mind. That is why folks buy them at $100. There is no belt clip, as Abbree provides milspec web gear for them. They also provide foldover antennas other milspec replicas. A forward observer mic is also available. This is a crossover product. Not just for hams.
I have one. It is mostly just a big FDE Baofeng. I think the biggest hit to its tacticoolness is the lat of waterproofing. I like the battery life and the kit I bought came with the antenna in the video and a big folder. I think the only thing I have issue with in this video is your quoted price. The AR152 is $69 (so you can probably get it cheaper) and my kit with every accessory available was still like $100.
UV5R with extended antenna and 3 batteries - $100-110
AR152 - $86 today online
I'm not seeing the problem with the cost. If it has any water resistance or increased ruggedness then it comes out ahead for the price.
At the time of this recording, the radio was $120. I was actually more disappointed with the low power output. Also I'm not sure how much faith I'd put in it being "water resistant"
I like mine:
-larger, easier to read screen
-fewer buttons
-larger buttons/control knobs (easier to manipulate when wearing gloves)
-ability to set different backlight colors for transmit & receive
-a little more water resistant (no external battery contact points); would like a plug for the power cable's barrel input connector
but water-proof tape works
-fits well in designated radio pouches
-feels solid, nice & chonky
-will probably buy another despite having a couple UV-5Rs
Overall, the review was helpful. The video provided information I was seeking 👍
you are unbelievably critical on something that is phenomenal at its price point.
Ok
@@HamRadio2 Truth hurts!
Exactly @@bryanpuckett3023
It's on Amazon today for $70, no USB charger. The lack of a plug over the charging port means it definitely is not weatherproof (except on sunny days in the Spring and Fall). I've heard the stock antenna for this one is better suited on the -5R, though any antenna other than what it came with would be. Still too expensive for LARPing and cosplay (which applies depends on how old you are).
I do like My AR152 Radio I have used it in the field a ton and Most of that was During camping in a few different Forests and I was able to reach repeaters over 10 miles away with no issues and even repeaters 80 miles away with no issues just a small amount of static I think its a great Radio for the price if you get the Full kit with all the accessories and the holster case for it 19:00 @Ham Radio 2.0
Well. Sort of a hit piece , my humble opinion. I purchased one received yesterday. Same model. My findings:
First, read the directions . Specifically, states charge 1st .
Or... damage to radio is possible. Battery needs to be used and FULLY DEPLETED several times for Optimum operation. AKA READ DIRECTIONS FIRST. I my findings. Are 9.57 watts on 2m. 6.43 on 17 cm high power mode.
I also purchased on Amazon. $89.00 . My package included.
2 antennas one is a fold over type.. Programming software package. Vehicle plug charger. USB charger. A very well constructed 19:05 belt case . Wall charger. Microphone / speaker. Received good reports ..
Rule 1#. Read directions. Out..
The first editions of these had some issues, low transmit mic gain mainly.
The newer version (the last few months) have good sounding audio, it’s a large relatively east to use and program once you learn how to keyboard program it,
It has good loud receive audio and with the larger display and backlit keypad it’s easier to use for those with big mitts.
Internally it’s mostly a clone of a UV5R late model as far as operation and functionality, almost identical menus and features.
They come in wanna be commando Army Green, Tacticool Desert tan and Black for those of us that aren’t wannabe Mil-Sim larper closet commandos
Testing on my IFR120B service monitor it’s within 100hz on being exactly on frequency on both UHF and VHF, the RX sensitivity is very good at -124 for 12 DB SINAD, TX power is actually about 8 watts on both UHF and VHF, TX deviation is just under maximum specs, 2.4 KHz on narrow band and 4.6 KHz on wide band.
Actual testing on the air compared to my APX7000, 8000 and XTS5000 radios which are $400 to $4000 on the used market, the 152 has virtually the same range as the top tier PS rated radios! The 152 does suffer front end overload at Comms tower sites that the PS radios are more immune to so it’s not a great🎉 Comms tech radio for site/systems work.
It build quality is pretty darn good for a $70 radio that covers VHF and UHF, no where near as rugged as a PS rated radio but it’s $70.
Battery life is very good, it lasts for several days of average use, spare batteries are available in all 3 colors for $30 from Amazon.
While it’s no public safety rated radio IMHO, it’s very well worth the $70 for what it does and what it is.
That's a good break down. My opinion having a radio for coms is more important than having nothing. I'm new and trying to evaluate the best options. Thanks for sharing.
Nope, it's not even close a UV-5R. Why everyone saying that? Because of the display? I hope this is just a joke guys...
Who's going to tell him the black is for the Blk-Ops Sog Ground Branch DevSoc Delta ODA RRC Ranger Oper8r.... at night
Could you post this on face books Baofeng for Beginners? I just posted my thoughts and what I found on mine, but all the haters wanted what you did to see. Maybe it will shut them up, seeing it isn't a splatter matter radio.
Thanks
"Mom, I want a Harris radio"
"We have Harris radios at home"
- Harris radio at home.
🤣
Just another note on the Baofeng AR-152, if you program the radio using the factory software you can open up the 1.25m band.
I may have to try that
Good info.
I'd like to see that on a spectrum analyzer. I'd bet it transmits on 220 and 440Mhz at the same time!
L3 Harris AN/PRC-152 replica. These and SINCGARS are commonly carried in a pack. Soldiers don't use belt clip devices. The PRC-152, as long as I have used it, has never had a belt clip. There is even a portable coder/programming device available for its competitors. Also a replica. (KDU/keypad display unit). It has a PTT function built in.
Big difference. AN/PRC-152 is of course a hand-held. SINCGARS, which I operated for the Marines, was not necessarily a 'man-pack' we also used vehicle mounted models. Another difference is the original SINCGARS was fielded in 1988, the AN/PRC -152 in 2005. Tech is substantially different as is capability. SINCGARS also used a KYK device for loading crypto and the SOI ( frequencies, callsigns etc). The SINCGARS was capable of frequency hopping on its own. To integrate a 152 into a SINCGARS net, an encryption key has to be programmed into the device itself.
FYI - you can check the battery level on a Baofeng radio by holding down the zero (0) button.
It is big but the battery life is amazing. Monitored 2 repeaters and one MURS Channel for 96 hours continuous. Need to work o. A test plane for transmit and monitor. From my point of view this is a good radio.
I did change the antenna and seems to work better.
AR does stand for amateur radio (just looked it up) and the military “nomenclature” (as we call it) is the AN/PRC - (input model number). AN/PRC (Army and Navy Portable Radio Communications if I remember correctly)). I used to repair these when I was active duty Marine Corps. Medically retired 2862 (Communications Maintenance Chief) here.
So im not the only 28xx that watches this kinda shit.
I carried a PRC-77 on my back, AM for line of site for close air support and a microwave in my Mark-151! The nomenclatures are bringing back memories.
@@jeff7160 I carried a 77 and a KY-38 device for secure coms....79-82.
I have made a primitive video showing how to add 1.25 meters to this transceiver. This was done on a salvaged camera that I found and bought a few things for it.
Just got 2 from AliExpress for 39.00 dollars each with 2 data cables. Took 5 weeks to it delivered but I got it with no damages, very well wrapped and protected.
Great news. I'm thinking of picking up another one and making a follow up video
@@HamRadio2 Excellent ! They have really dropped in price since they were introduced. 73 de WA4ONV.
The extended length battery for the UV5R makes it easier to hold for my big hands, it is a 3800Milliamp battery. I use it for my triband radio.
11-19-2023, 11:39PM, PST
: I received my from Amazon for $69.00
I use it as a scanner to monitor the Los Angeles County Fair Department. Outstanding piece of equipment for using it for this purpose. I am so digging the long battery life.
I also purchased a
KENMAX
400-470MHz UHF Flexible Spring Walkie Antenna. It's much shorter and works much better than the stock antenna that you receive what this unit. I'm using it for receive only. 🐢 👍 🐢 😀
The 8.4V on the wall plug shows that the lithium ion charging chip is in the wall adapter so it is actually not a power supply but a charger. I find those USB chargers taking the 5V to 8V quite useless as it will fry the usb port at some stage. Greetings from Uganda and thanks for you informative videos.
Im going to buy one, because I like bigger radios. The fact it doesn't contain a belt clip sucks, but wont stop me from buying it. Baofeng knocked this one out of the park. I love it!
Knocked it out of the park? Perhaps a foul ball that flew backwards over the batters box and into the street then run over by a garbage truck. Can bet bigger battery for UV5R for fraction of the price that will make the radio bigger. I'm quite certain this radio has no water IP rating.
I really hope you're joking 🤣
@@bradskis81 i like big radios, and no joke, i like this one.😀
Ill have to look up the actual brand of holster for this radio, but it is nylon ADJUSTABLE and has a very solid hasp clip. Attaches to the belt vertically or horizontally and if you do need to get to the radio, there is a thumb break in the front of the holster after you disconnect the clip. I like this radio too. So far it has worked in areas my UV 82 wont.
It's a us military comms radio it's supposed to go on a plate carrier or a chest rig
If you tap the hash tag button it will change the low medium and high power without going into the menu on baofeng Radios @Ham Radio 2.0
I bought one through Ebay. It came with every accessory including the molle pouch which btw is fairly well made. What makes the radio a hit for me is the sound quality and the fact that it is LOUD! A great feature with hearing loss. I also like the large keybad and screen. As far as belt clips go, I've broken almost every belt clip on my other 4 baofeng radios, so for me the pouch is far superior. One last comment. The current version is 15 watts. I don't know what the real output would be, but it will be much better than the older 10 watt version.
If anybody actually wants a good replica for a Falcon III they need to look at TRI or TCA PRC-152s. They interface with most Falcon accessories and have far better displays and power outputs. I'd love to see you review one of those and compare it to this one, Jason!
TCA's are far better than the TRI brand.
What are the output powers on the various bands, please? What are the bands covered, please?
Glad I happened upon this video and especially your post. I purchased the TRI AN/PRC-152a and I have a genuine Harris KDU and cable, and apparently they're not compatible. Any clue about this setup? People complain that the TRI KDU is plastic-y feeling, and their complaints have no merit, because the original Harris KDU is plastic as well. I have the quad band version.
Ah which one is better tri or tca?
@@aldonalexander7178
Apples and oranges, I own one of each, current late 2023 release radios.
They’re both built well, heavy aluminum housings, however the TRI On/off/volume control feels a little flimsy to me. Neither came with a manual and they’re hard to find accurate manuals on the net. The TRA has better RX audio but weak transmit audio, the TRI the opposite! Tinny RX audio, and great TX audio, go figure! The TRI concentric switch has three positions, companded audio, standard audio and scrambled RX TX audio. This is not documented anywhere! I was about to send the POS back until I found out I had it in the companded mode which makes the RX audio even more tinny and distorted.
The companding feature in the menu doesn’t work at all. The Vol and concentric control on the TRI feel cheap and kinda sloppy to me, the TRA controls feel tighter and more robust.
The TRI can’t be programmed by a PC, the TRA can, you’ll need the software and the side connector programming cable.
They’re different from each other and there is definitely a learning curve figuring out the keypad programming without a manual, and I’ve found the ones on line are about 75 percent accurate.
The main issues as far as programming goes are, the TRI has 128 channels, AKA and has a Baofeng’ish menu structure. No channel groups or zones within those 128 channels,
The TRA has 8 groups of 16 channels each, the biggest PITA with the TRA is when using PL/CTCSS it’s either full RX/TX PL or csq, you cannot separate for TX only PL or cross coded PL tones for RX and TX when keypad programming, however PC programming allows separate RX TX PL codes and TX only PL programming, very frustrating as if you need a TX only or cross coded PL channel you’re stuck with PC programming! The Menus are significantly different between the two radios, the TRI is very similar to a Baofeng, the TCA nothing like Baofeng
Like many Chinese radios the firmware is a little buggy and twitchy, and a few menu items either work strangely or not at all. For direct radio to radio or a single full PL repeater both are fine, the keypad programming PL limitation of the TRA is frustrating! Proof that the engineers that wrote the firmware aren’t very radio savvy, hopefully that will change.
The other issue I’ve noticed with the TRI is it can be configured to use either the top control for volume or the top side buttons, the top control make sense to me BUT for some reason that causes some receive audio distortion at lower volume levels, using the side controls for volume the distortion is gone, another design problem! It’s not very bad and not everyone would hear it I’m guessing.
One more thing, the TCA has a longer squelch burst at the end of a transmission than the TRI, it’s not objectionable. I understand the TCA is an SDR type receiver, the TRI more of a “standard” superhet receiver, both are very sensitive, about -122 on my COM-120C service monitor, transmitter power is about 7 watts output with a charged battery, battery life is great, about 24 hours of mostly receiving and some transmitting.
Overall I like both radios but I do wish they’d do a better job of getting the firmware and features right the first time!
I have this in black.use it for Fire/LEO work. This radio is a BEAST. Loud audio, very well lit screen and keys and long battery life.
the only issue I have is the long antenna and I substituted it with a 450 mhz stubby(I dont use the VHF side of this radio) and it does well as well. The kenwood lapel mic fits and functions. There are several material carrying cases for this radio as well ranging from a pouch and strap to an adjustable holster type case. I like it but it is big in the hand. Past that looking forward to getting spare battery on those long weekend shifts.
lol what
@@ironmatic1 the radio works for me. Im not a hamster so ham bands would be a waste of chip space to me.
What agency allows you to use this junk on their systems?
@@P25AES not tellin you
@@P25AES This guy is obviously a whacker volunteer. Whoever holds the license for the frequencies he's using is technically liable for FCC civil forfeiture from him using non-type approved equipment on their station.
I don’t own this one, but have a small collection of other Baofengs. My take on this model is like yours Jason. This model is just for show. If they wanted to make this one more suitable for the game players, they should have upgraded the speaker/mike connector. I own a couple of the Btech triband HTs. So far this is the best of all the Baofeng variants when you add the Nagoya triband antenna and the 3800mah battery. WB5NOE
I agree with you. The 5X3 is definitely the best of the UV-5R variants. I likewise went with with the Nagoya NA-320A tri-bander.
I just received mine today 3/25/2023 from Amazon for $75 I got two. It's charging overnight then I will review and test it to see how it performs ✌️
If this was proven to be submersible, shock proof, weather proof etc I can see this being applicable for actual field or tactical use. They didn't even do that so it seems tactical only applies to it's aesthetics. Then again there are plenty of UV5Rs in use in Ukraine that also have none of those features.
I get one a few weeks ago, more tacticool than functional, needs to buy a new antenna, its more for the use of airsoft than ham, but its good to get a molle pouch mount it on your tactical backback and use it for aprs
The antenna is actually good especially on UHF
Okay, as a user of HT's, I even have 2 Baofeng HT's and two TYT HT's. Here is something I have learned. When testing SWR and Power. Set the frequency to 1466.000. Since that is dead center in the middle of the 2 meter band. Remember folks, the higher the SWR the lower the power will be. Oh and you will only get the full power on one frequency.
The radio should still be putting out near 10 watts. For the radiated power to be as low as 5 and 6 watts the SWR would need to be in the ballpark of 5:1.
It's $90 on Amaz including a belt loop case + 18" antenna, that sounds fine to me
Is the prices come down since I recorded this video. You can actually get them cheaper than $90 on other sites
@@HamRadio2 yep, I think your opinion is valid, a few other people have wondered what this thing is for
Input voltage is NOT necessarily the voltage of the battery, just what the charging circuit input uses.
I bought both the bf-f8hp and the ar-152 which are allegedly the same guts...NOT!
Side by side scanning, the ar is superior even when switching antennas.
You must have gotten a bad one.
AR is certainly more powerful than the bf-8hp
They are very different units.
I got mine for 65$ and with the battery life its a good radio
I have the blackand tan and green
Dude. I know your video is a year old, but these even a year ago were 69.99. Today they are 69.99. You have to look at the packages that this radio is with. This radio is unlocked as well. Its a great radio. Big buttons, big screen, and huge battery.
At the time of this recording, it was the price I said in the video. Also it doesn't output the power that it advertises so it doesn't seem like a great rig to me. Instead get the Harris PRC-117
Given the color, I'm kinda surprised it didn't come with a small package of green plastic army men 😁
I actually just bought one for a review as well for SHTF, Survival, etc. I actually like it for the battery mainly. I can't wait to see your thoughts I will hold off watching yours until my review is done and see how we compare :) Love your channel and you inspire me every day!!!!!!
Worth it?
Is it worth it?
Mine registered 9.8 watts on high setting Maybe you didn't do it right Oh you got a bad radio Mine also came with a 4 foot collapsible antenna And it transmits a good 10 miles easily Also mine for that price came with two radios not one And it also had battery pouches specific to that radio with Molly attachments on the back
No it's just poor quality control from 'feng
It's just a BF-F8-HP with a different shell and battery.
+2w over 5 watts over the UV5R does not equal one S number
Mine came with a nice tactical carrying belt holster as well as an additional 18.89" ABBREE antenna.
The new version of this radio it is IP57 Rated @Ham Radio 2.0
Military grade= made by lowest bidder.
In order to carry it you have to use a radio pouch which baofeng sells.
10:20 Dude to be fair, military radios don't have belt clips. They use pouches which attach to webbing
There are bigger Kits with this Radio now for 129 that you do get a Holster for it and I belive a belt clip as well @Ham Radio 2.0
Nice
I believe “some people” call it boof-wang.
You get twice as many fars by pronouncing it that way. Fact.
Even though you don't recommend the radio, would you recommend the antenna? I've been considering that type of antenna for my UV-5R cause it looks sturdier than say the Nagoya Whip antenna and longer than the stock Baofeng plastic antennas. Also, do you know if the AR-152 antenna is compatible with the UV-5R?
Sure, the antenna is fine
It now sells for $60 on eBay and Amazon. It’s cool looking and okay to monitor local analog fire freqs but that’s about it ..
The same thing off Amazon for 116. I have a 18-24 in antenna that folds out. Plus I have 2 other 3 mile, black
for the price i would say GD77 .. at least then you would be able to do DMR
TACTICAL is out the window already because that charging port is open and exposed so as soon as it gets wet its gonna short out. No replaceable battery means if it dies in the field you can just change to a fresh battery. My guess is its UV5R in a big case with bigger battery.
Wonder if the antenna being as long as it is adds any gain and the advertised power is ERP
I would be inclined to keep my UV5R, with the belt clip and hand held antenna in my pocket. It is slimmer than a pack of cigarettes, at least as far as I remember, not being a smoker. The green one seems more of a gimmick than an improvement.
Military carries those radios in a radio pouch, not on a belt clip. But for civilian use i could see a belt clip being okay, probably would be prone to breaking though with how big the radio is. 🤷🏻♂️
I bought one. Don't see the issues.
Good
You said the antenna is 25.5 mm long at 3.40, isn't that mat in cm? Maybe my hearing is going, sucks getting old. Thanks for the video on the signal generator, I purchased it and tuned the old am radios.
I use to have those rubber duck antennas on my Baofeng UV-82 radios and I couldn't figure out why the radios had very short range. I finally tested the antennas and I had very high SWR's on both radios. I tried some other antennas but I finally found an antenna that worked well. It's the Abbree 38" tactical antenna. I was able to get my SWR's down to 1.2. This greatly improved my range on both radios.
PS. I was thinking about getting one of those AR-152's. Not anymore!! Thank you!!!
I throw it in a pouch and the larger/spread out buttons are great with gloves.
My AR152 Is Awesome !!! I would buy again !!!
I only paid $84.99 for one on Amazon, they delivered it in two days. I paid $169.99 for two radios. Very good construction, looks great but weighs 4.44 pounds per radio. Have not taken them out in the field yet.
This video is a year old
Thank you for your video. I really enjoyed it. @@HamRadio2
Well I’m stumped. I cannot program my two radios to save my life. I love my radios and want to keep them. I don’t know what to do now. So sad.
@@348MP Use CHIRP software and program them like UV5-R radios. It's super easy.
I just ordered one on Amazon for 70.99 tan color if that what you call that color
Too bad W&W associates probably no longer carry’s belt clips and mounting pad with a high power adhesive. These were great for some of the earlier radios that had zero provisions for a belt clip.
Might try charging the battery for a day and redo the power output test.
I have found Amazon's pricing to be about 15%+ higher than direct sales from other sources.
You can even get a Camo UV-5R with Camo extended battery. Tacticool sums it up, I’d say! Great for Airsofters but that’s probably about it. Great video! 73’s from the U.K.!
That's what I've got. Looks great with a BNC mini Abbree folding.
73 M7TUD
So my wife bought a couple of these for us. We dont have any experience. We just wanted a way to talk without cellphones. About how far away could we be and still talk?
Depends on terrain, if you are on VHF or UHF, and what power you transmit at.
My wife and I have talked 28 miles apart on VHF 146.520 at 5 watts while we were on opposing peaks of a mountain range. After getting off the peak we lost comms. In most common terrain you should be able to get a mile or two, sometimes longer, often times shorter if trees or hills get in the way.
When you get into repeaters that’s a whole new realm of possibilities.
You don't need a belt clip, it's meant to go in a radio pouch on your kit, genius.
what do you do with the radio after you review it?
Carry another uv5r radio so you can do a transmit/receiver test between the two to compare the difference.
First found out about these via Ringway Manchester. I'll add one my collection if price and availability gets better here in the UK. I really like the look of it.
73 M7TUD
I bought mine for $60 same accessories as yours minus the usb cable. No belt clip was the first thing I noticed. Programming software is the next challenge.
Use CHIRP programming software. Do the initial download from the radio to CHIRP using UV-5R setting. I programmed mine this way and it works perfectly.
Add the term Special Forces...Tactical...Operator...Navy Seal, or a similar term to any item which normally retails for $25.00, and the price doubles or triples.
Modular power connector, ROFL, industry, all I know of, calls it a coaxial power connector.
The antenna is 25,cm not 22mm like you stated lol, 25mm is one inch
The AR Stands For Assault Radio @Ham Radio 2.0
Lol, right
@@HamRadio2 I'm just Stating What they Call It Lol
@@HamRadio2 radios like this Used To be Used Like a Billy Club or a Old Metal Maglite that took 6 D Cell Batteries
@@AntonioClaudioMichael oh I am sure its been called that. AR-15 rifles are called that too, but it actually means "Armalite Rifle"
@@HamRadio2I know Armalite Rifle it's the First Developer To have ever Made The Ar-15 interesting Conversation Change From Assault Radio TO Billy clubs and mag lights to Weapeons Aren't we missing knives Bro 😂
I was going to buy this radio until I saw your video I changed my mind I can't believe they get away with lying if it's States 10 w or better thank you Jason 👍
There’s other reviews out there that showed higher wattage when hooked up to meters
It's supposed to have a pouch that goes on your belt or on your Molly equipment as they're trying to portray it as a military radio
I'm pretty sure the only people buying this thing are UA-cam reviewers picking them up to recommend we don't. Appreciate you guys!
Airsofters use these to play Army
@@Johnyrocket70 That's true. Good point.
@@Johnyrocket70 My nephew plays airsoft and I got him licensed, so he uses a real radio where everyone can hear him better than anyone on the field.
@Ham Radio 2.0 what's the "real radio"?
@@landersm223
Anything he's not looking down his nose at
I returned because I finally got a green AR-152 to test. I am not sure if the khaki one I had to test was a factor freak, or if they are made slightly different. But I got very similar results to the video with the green one. It was only slightly higher wattage. I would like to see if another khaki one coming in and another green one coming in will have the same results. A black one has not come in for me to programme.
I would love to see a video on this particular radio.TCA PRC 152A. These are clones of Harris falcon iii.
Do you think prc-152 is reliable and worth to buy it?Thanks
The TCA is just a big baofeng. If you go out anf buy one of the overpriced fakes buy s TRI
It's "tactical" because it's VERY durable. Mine has been dropped on concrete from 10 feet, and pummeled with rain, while bicycling. It isn't IP-rated, but it IS quite robust and resilient, as my experience demonstrates.
The battery lasts a very long time. It's easy enough to test whether it is really 1.2 ah.
You won't find another HT with ~ 8W high TX power this robust for the price, which is now ~ $70. Sure, it capitalizes on the "tactical" marketing craze, but frankly it IS a great radio for tactical operations such as SAR, Skywarn, etc.
It does not scan very fast.
Amazon and other secondary markets always exaggerate the output power.
Actual low power on these is ~1.6W on low; ~ 5.5W on medium; ~ 7.5-8W on high.
If one is going to do a purportedly critical review of a dual band HT and is suspicious of the claimed power output, with all due respect, an MFJ wattmeter is not a credible measurement device for that purpose.
A belt clip would be useless on a radio of this size and weight! There are green, black, and camel colored Molle and belt attachable lightweight cases. I have mine strapped into the side of my tactical backpack.
I must respectfully dissent from your opinion. Go ahead and rely on a UV-5R as your primary operational HT if you like. That's rather like jumping from an aircraft with a parachute made out of a space blanket.
What about now that it's a year later and the price point is down to 69.99? Still not worth it over the UV-5R?
It is still 3x the cost of a UV-5R with no features to justify the price.
@@HamRadio2 Ah understandable, I was just curious if the drop in price could warrant it, but everything I’ve seen agrees with you. Thanks for responding, loved the info!
Marketers sell the story of a products price, some folks will buy that story up even though the 30 dollar product is the same as the 120.. Mah batteries increase price slightly. Good video. 👍
was $80, and is a great radio (on amazon)
Look at the date this video was posted
@@HamRadio2and? This review was pretty lackluster at best. You seemed to purposely be ignorant to be this biased.
Tactical radios live in a radio pouch not on a belt clip. The Harris this thing is ripping off lives in one and doesn't have a belt clip.
Fairly certain it has no clip as it’s meant to imitate the Harris PRC 152 (which would be held in a radio pouch)
I bought mine on Amazon for $69.79. I like it in my collection.
You bought yours a year or more after I did
@hamradio2.0 Hello Shannon,
This is Olivia from Baofeng support team.
The output power will be affected by various factors; however, some dealers will appear to misrepresent the output power. Also, the AR-152 radio is a customized model for our dealers, and we suggest you can confirm the output power of the radio with the seller again before purchase.
Thanks for your understanding. If there's anything else we can help with, feel free to contact us.
Regards,
Olivia
Baofeng Support Team
Feel free to send me anything that you want tested. This radio was advertised at a certain power rating and it didn't live up to that rating.
The one I bought from eBay came with a lot more and was cheaper. Has two anti and belt clip, and hand mic plus more and it was much cheaper.
Might be a fake copy
@@HamRadio2they all work the same, regardless of what name is stamped across it.
What was the reason not to buy it?
Not as advertised
Lithium batteries take several charge cycles to obtain maximum output current.
What ability does this radio have to scan a wide range of frequencies?
Exact same menus and functionality as the UV-9R except entering VFO mode is different
I know this is an old video. That would be 26 centimeters. If it was 26 millimeters, it would be only about an inch.
so it can be charged in the field with solar batteries
I would bet the battery is 7.2v based on the charging voltage. Seems to be just a dressed up UV-5R
I remember when Handies were very expensive ,Icom kenwood Yaesu Alinco , today radio are a steal , the quality is not the same but the battery life is way better , and what's a real good expensive radio with a short battery life , I prefer the longer battery life , I remember paying $600 for a Icom W2A my dream radio , a top of radio on its time , and way ahead if its time too , but the battery life for such a radio sucked . I know the brands I mentioned above are suffering with these Chinese radios , but thier battery life puts them on top for out door use , specially when transmitting on simplex on high power . That's my take on hand held radios of the past and the future. 73s