PART 2 | Checks on design of one way slabs | IS 456 | Mumbai University

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 160

  • @universeisherestudytime8701
    @universeisherestudytime8701 2 роки тому +1

    spacing in dist. bar is 335 then why in diag. it is taken as 300 ?

  • @NavjotSingh-qd2is
    @NavjotSingh-qd2is 5 років тому +1

    Nyc way of giving info

  • @neerajgendre519
    @neerajgendre519 2 роки тому

    Thankyou sir ....to the point explanation

  • @binulkrishnasb6691
    @binulkrishnasb6691 2 роки тому

    Thankyou Sir .This video was so helpful

  • @palak6513
    @palak6513 4 роки тому +1

    I am not understanding why.....? The same velue provided in fs for AST ...😟😟

  • @kuntagayatrikiran2112
    @kuntagayatrikiran2112 2 роки тому

    Very clear explanation

  • @yarkapwelly7034
    @yarkapwelly7034 5 місяців тому

    How do you place development length in the slab?

  • @engineersreview3967
    @engineersreview3967 6 років тому

    THANKS TO YOU BROTHER ..... FOR YOUR TIME AND EFFORT.

  • @assaultergaming2291
    @assaultergaming2291 4 роки тому +1

    At 12:00 .......Sir u have used effective depth But In lesson 18 Of NPTEL For one way slabs in a numerical they have used the Total depth ....please get me out of this problem......

    • @EverythingCivil
      @EverythingCivil  4 роки тому

      Yes it should be total depth.

    • @assaultergaming2291
      @assaultergaming2291 4 роки тому

      @@EverythingCivil Thanku sir I appreciate ur hard work
      I have a doubt on ductile detailing of a beam . I calculated all the reinforcement that is required in a continuous beam including longitudinal r/f and shear r/f asnper the IS 13920 .
      But I can't visualize the r/f and I can't draw the detaling of beam at a section ...please help me or if it is possible please make a lecture on designing and detailing of a continuous beam
      Thanku sir again

  • @ab_IaNbSH
    @ab_IaNbSH 5 років тому

    Thank u sir ... 😀 really loved the way u explained..

  • @abhijeetsurwade2574
    @abhijeetsurwade2574 4 роки тому

    Vu< Ꞇc, thats the simple check for shear. Instead of calculating K Ꞇc.

    • @brajeshsharma2403
      @brajeshsharma2403 4 роки тому +1

      But is code suggests that Tc taken for design is actually bit less than Tc for more safety standards...for slab

  • @raveegohil5264
    @raveegohil5264 4 роки тому

    Thanks for sharing. Explained very well.

  • @abhisheksagar4510
    @abhisheksagar4510 3 роки тому

    Instead of checking the depth can we not directly calculate the depth assuming that Ast req.= Ast given hence fs won't change.

  • @SONURAJ-yo4lo
    @SONURAJ-yo4lo 4 роки тому

    Super sir 👍👍👍👍👍

  • @rajkumarkanukuntla1908
    @rajkumarkanukuntla1908 6 років тому

    Sir post a video on combined footing....
    u r explanation is pretty good..n by u r videos we have learnt the usage of code book....

  • @konyeitetsuya8271
    @konyeitetsuya8271 6 років тому +5

    But pt% value doesn't come as 0.19% when calculated.. Please explain

  • @ameerva6310
    @ameerva6310 5 років тому

    This videos are excellent.

  • @charanbabu6848
    @charanbabu6848 5 років тому

    thank u so much bro
    got clarity to many doubts with ur explanation

  • @a-youtube-user-
    @a-youtube-user- 4 роки тому

    How to find bent up bar angle and how much distance we provide it from the support

  • @Buddies-td3rm
    @Buddies-td3rm 6 років тому +5

    How to calculate the value of bent up

  • @lkcreations_lkc909
    @lkcreations_lkc909 5 років тому +1

    Oo so good bro

  • @noha72kashmiri20
    @noha72kashmiri20 5 років тому

    Sir, Ast distb. Steel mei hum effective depth nhi lata hai overall depth lata hai

  • @mohiyuddinchanegaonkar6607
    @mohiyuddinchanegaonkar6607 4 роки тому

    Best video

  • @camberbay3522
    @camberbay3522 2 роки тому

    which ast value you took for fy and pt% calculation

  • @ieskarangupta31
    @ieskarangupta31 4 роки тому

    For distribution bar, BD is used as cross - sectional area I think

  • @Athrav1512
    @Athrav1512 6 років тому +1

    Sir for bending movement you took value of L as 3.125 Where as for finding shear for you took value of L as 3. Doubt in this pls explain

  • @NarenderKumar-wb1dd
    @NarenderKumar-wb1dd 4 роки тому

    in shear check permissible shear force is calculated with length 3m instead of effective length 3.125m.

  • @meghapuri631
    @meghapuri631 6 років тому +2

    Can u plese tell about check of development length bcz i dont know how u took L○ value or we have to check wether Lo value is less than Ld

    • @EverythingCivil
      @EverythingCivil  6 років тому

      Megha Puri Lo value is the length available from centre of end support to the face of the support. So generally Lo= ( half the with of support - clear side cover) hope this helps

  • @RohitKumar-gg4cn
    @RohitKumar-gg4cn 3 роки тому

    Wo sb to thk hai pr kaisay pta chlay ga ki kitne MM ka reinforcement use krna hai

  • @suMit_303
    @suMit_303 2 роки тому

    how do u calculate 20.18x10^3 in development length..plz help

  • @vipinvats7788
    @vipinvats7788 5 років тому

    How did reinforemnet placed in middle section... In the last line of lecture ....

  • @biveksah2615
    @biveksah2615 5 років тому

    From where did u write value of Ast required and provided??

  • @hellostranger9645
    @hellostranger9645 2 роки тому

    What fs line should I take if the fs value is 200, for finding MF

  • @NikhilKumar-qe7hw
    @NikhilKumar-qe7hw 3 роки тому

    Sir shar force is 20.81 in Ld calculation put 20.18 why ....

  • @DEVBHARDWAJROCKS
    @DEVBHARDWAJROCKS 6 років тому +1

    Is there a different criteria for deflection check on beams and slabs??

  • @rishikeshjoshi5220
    @rishikeshjoshi5220 4 роки тому

    Osssom brother how nice to teach
    Please make more video on stair column

  • @ameerva6310
    @ameerva6310 5 років тому +1

    Sir,please make a video regarding design of inverted t beam foundation for g+ 1 residential buildings.thanks

  • @kabirsharma8568
    @kabirsharma8568 6 років тому +12

    %p calculation mistake ...its come 0.32

  • @ABHI-pg8wx
    @ABHI-pg8wx 5 років тому

    The 0.1lx using lx value effective lx or normal lx = 3000 ah?...

  • @punitbhardwaj1465
    @punitbhardwaj1465 5 років тому

    Thank you sir it's very helpful for me

  • @muqeetamin3222
    @muqeetamin3222 6 років тому

    why is 3.125m effective length shown as c/c distance between the supports? while c/c distance between the supports is 3.3m not 3.125.

    • @EverythingCivil
      @EverythingCivil  6 років тому

      Please refer Cl 22.2 a of IS 456 pg 34. It will clear your doubt.

  • @pa.van08
    @pa.van08 4 роки тому

    Thanks bro
    Tomorrow I have exam
    This lecture uses me a lot

  • @faizankamal2804
    @faizankamal2804 5 років тому

    Sir can u please tell how did u get the value or area of steel required?

  • @alfikhar1
    @alfikhar1 6 років тому +1

    For delflection criteria can we also check by span/350??????

    • @EverythingCivil
      @EverythingCivil  6 років тому

      That formula is for steel structures.

    • @alfikhar1
      @alfikhar1 6 років тому

      @@EverythingCivil in case of steel structure deflection criteria is span/360 for S.S
      For cantilever span/180

  • @guptadmiji
    @guptadmiji 5 років тому +1

    Sir most of the book..the effective span is directly calculated by span/25 its correct

    • @ananyapandey6886
      @ananyapandey6886 5 років тому

      Was it the eff depth? d=span /25. ??????

    • @guptadmiji
      @guptadmiji 5 років тому

      @@ananyapandey6886 yess i mean to say sir

    • @guptadmiji
      @guptadmiji 5 років тому +1

      @@ananyapandey6886 actually its real formula is span / modifications factor x base value

  • @mohiyuddinchanegaonkar6607
    @mohiyuddinchanegaonkar6607 4 роки тому

    For shear check for pt% which ast is to be used req or prov

  • @savitotsukru4018
    @savitotsukru4018 5 років тому +2

    Please solve another question of one way slab . I loved it.

  • @introtravelly
    @introtravelly 6 років тому +1

    What checks comes under servicibality check ? Please answer sir

  • @kunalbadgujar8628
    @kunalbadgujar8628 4 роки тому

    Sir bent up bars kitne length pr bent karte hai
    Apne last figure me 0.1L liya hai

    • @EverythingCivil
      @EverythingCivil  4 роки тому

      It depends upon various design characteristics. Mostly it is adopted in between L/7 to L/10

  • @rathinasamysamy9438
    @rathinasamysamy9438 3 роки тому

    Placing for mainbar shorterspan or longer span

  • @shamindersingh8435
    @shamindersingh8435 3 роки тому

    in deflection check d=span/(20*M.F) where 20 is for simply supported , for fixed slab what this value is to be ??

    • @POOJAKUMARI-tf4xe
      @POOJAKUMARI-tf4xe 3 роки тому

      In case of fixed slab the deflection is negligible , hence there is no need of checking deflection in fixed slab

    • @shamindersingh8435
      @shamindersingh8435 3 роки тому

      @@POOJAKUMARI-tf4xe Generally (5" thick slab) we provide beam to control deflection in slab or break span into 2 parts (eg:7m x 5m in this case we provide beam and now span is 3.5m x 5m ). In case (7m x 5m) slab will prone to deflection we must have to check the deflection.

  • @dadwalhoney1374
    @dadwalhoney1374 6 років тому

    Can u draw that fully with explanation that this value is taken from it etc . ??

  • @santhoshsaran4678
    @santhoshsaran4678 5 років тому

    how u get shear force is 20x10^3

  • @eCivil5
    @eCivil5 4 роки тому

    Sir,
    Lo ki value kya rakhi in Development Length Check Case. Please Explain!!!

  • @mr.yassarzhari257
    @mr.yassarzhari257 7 років тому

    very well explained sir.

  • @ARVIND574
    @ARVIND574 6 років тому

    Here spacing of main bars is 185 mm c/c at mid but if we bent up bars at support the spacing is 2* 185=370 mm b/w main bars which is more than 300 mm . so it does not follow spacing criteria .Justify Pls?

    • @EverythingCivil
      @EverythingCivil  6 років тому

      You are right. But its does not have to be like that we need the required area of steel and spacing at midspan. However, the requirement of steel reduces at support as bending moment at support reduces. therefore the code allows us to take only 50% of the total mid span steel into the supports and therefore the spacing doubles. the maximum spacing criteria you are telling about is for midspan.

  • @rasmiranjansatapathy9307
    @rasmiranjansatapathy9307 6 років тому +1

    Very nice

  • @sanwaria
    @sanwaria 6 років тому

    Hi , Nice work there brother thanks a lot first of all. Coming to query , can you please make a video for slabs and beams for detailings of simply supported and continuous patterns as per IS 34 and IS 64 for calculation of top and bottom steel and in mid spans or so. like L/3, L/4 lengths to be provided.

  • @DesignReady.
    @DesignReady. 5 років тому

    Hii i have one question
    When you give a check to deflection u used Ast required to ast provided ratio......
    # This is Ast x or Ast y .?

    • @usama8286
      @usama8286 5 років тому

      Same doubt bhai...
      Pata chala kya liye hai sir ne...?

  • @zenithchoudhary
    @zenithchoudhary 2 роки тому

    Thank you 🙏

  • @RajaKumar-uw2gm
    @RajaKumar-uw2gm 3 роки тому

    Thanks sir 🙏🙏🙏

  • @sumitpardhi6233
    @sumitpardhi6233 4 роки тому

    Make video on detailing of slab

  • @SalmanKhan-vi4gi
    @SalmanKhan-vi4gi 4 роки тому

    How to calculate critical shear in slab Vcr dude

    • @EverythingCivil
      @EverythingCivil  4 роки тому

      Calculate at distace d(effective depth) from the face of the supports.

  • @ZangpoSonam
    @ZangpoSonam 6 років тому

    @everything civil can you do the checks for two way slab as well.

    • @EverythingCivil
      @EverythingCivil  6 років тому

      It is quite similar to one way slabs. Its self explanatory. But ill try to make a video definitely.

  • @dakshshah2812
    @dakshshah2812 5 років тому

    What to do if Development check does not satisfy

  • @vibhore9624
    @vibhore9624 6 років тому

    Modification Factor caluclated by you is a
    Simple guess
    Or
    is there any formula for it
    ?????

    • @EverythingCivil
      @EverythingCivil  6 років тому

      No it's not a guess based on Ast provided find pt% and using that and fst value choose right curve from the grAph and find MF . Put that MF in span/depth formula and calculate depth which should be greater than depth that you have provided

    • @EverythingCivil
      @EverythingCivil  6 років тому

      Initially you have to fix the depth (for beams or for slabs) for that purpose you have to assume a value of M.F which is actually based in the pt%. Generally we take MF higher for slabs around 1.4 to 1.5, while for beams we keep it lower around 1.2-1.3. Its very obvious if you take MF higher for your design you are providing higher pt% and hence your depth reduces and tension carrying capacity is increased. Hope it helps.

  • @vennisadhana9124
    @vennisadhana9124 6 років тому

    how to find bend bar length

  • @chinnac6389
    @chinnac6389 7 років тому +3

    Nice explanation with clause number ( in detail) , please explain design of 1) Beam 2) Column 3) two way slab and 4) Flat slab

    • @EverythingCivil
      @EverythingCivil  7 років тому +2

      Thanks for watching. Please check out
      SINGLY REINFORCED BEAM :ua-cam.com/video/r4sypwFUN7k/v-deo.html
      DOUBLY REINFORCED BEAM : ua-cam.com/video/MjlaVH7q6hA/v-deo.html
      COLUMN DESIGN : ua-cam.com/video/y9LI6x0GY5Q/v-deo.html
      Two way slabs and flat slabs will be uploaded soon.

    • @lkcreations_lkc909
      @lkcreations_lkc909 5 років тому

      @@EverythingCivil
      Okk

  • @muhammedsuhail7125
    @muhammedsuhail7125 7 років тому

    superb

  • @DEVBHARDWAJROCKS
    @DEVBHARDWAJROCKS 6 років тому

    Cantilever 7
    Simply supported 20
    Continuous 26
    These are l/d ratio for beams... Can we use same ratio for slabs????
    If yes than ratio of span /overall depth
    S.s. = 35
    Continuous =40 is used where ???

    • @DEVBHARDWAJROCKS
      @DEVBHARDWAJROCKS 6 років тому

      Than why do we use these different parameters....

    • @EverythingCivil
      @EverythingCivil  6 років тому

      Where have u seen 35 and 40? 7, 20 and 26 are actually basic values not l/d ratio.

    • @DEVBHARDWAJROCKS
      @DEVBHARDWAJROCKS 6 років тому

      Is 456. 2000
      Page 39
      24.1.2

    • @EverythingCivil
      @EverythingCivil  6 років тому +1

      It's extra notes given in addition to clause 23.2 also 35 and 40 is for loads up to 3kn/m² only.

  • @ankitsuri523
    @ankitsuri523 5 років тому

    What value you took for lo?????

  • @mohammadasifsk6827
    @mohammadasifsk6827 5 років тому

    Sir how to draw C/S of slab

  • @bestend4749
    @bestend4749 6 років тому

    Can you explain about finding Lo in develpoment check ??

    • @EverythingCivil
      @EverythingCivil  6 років тому

      Please watch this video from 25:40
      Video link : ua-cam.com/video/hCFeXnmigjM/v-deo.html

  • @supriya9902
    @supriya9902 6 років тому +1

    Sir...please show the calculation of lo also in detail

    • @EverythingCivil
      @EverythingCivil  6 років тому

      Lo is length available from centre of support to the edge of the support minus the clear cover.

  • @حوراءكاظم-ذ3ل
    @حوراءكاظم-ذ3ل 2 роки тому

    .i have equstion. Can u help me ???

  • @ganeshmegavath5640
    @ganeshmegavath5640 6 років тому

    is it necessary to draw fig atlast ii eaxmination

  • @ahmadmasood8317
    @ahmadmasood8317 5 років тому

    make a video on cantilever slab with concentrated load

  • @faizankamal2804
    @faizankamal2804 5 років тому

    Sir please tell how did u take Ast provided = 402.16 while checking for deflection ? It's no where in the whole solution
    Please tell me as soon as possible..I have exam tomorrow

  • @Manjunath_pai
    @Manjunath_pai 6 років тому +1

    what is lo in development check

    • @EverythingCivil
      @EverythingCivil  6 років тому +1

      It is basically length available from centre of support to the edge of the support minus the side cover. It shows that you cannot extend your bar beyond lo from that you have to bend the bar downwards or upwards.

  • @greenlight4225
    @greenlight4225 6 років тому

    There’s problem in pt% you calculate it will not come 0.19%

  • @ABHI-pg8wx
    @ABHI-pg8wx 5 років тому

    Bro tow v ,tow c greater or less. That part i am not learn . Plz xplain that

  • @Durgeshkumar-ip1ls
    @Durgeshkumar-ip1ls 5 років тому

    Thanks sir

  • @rajkiran1033
    @rajkiran1033 6 років тому

    Sir in the fig u have given that the length of bend up bar from the centre of support is 0.14
    Can u pls explain me that sir

    • @EverythingCivil
      @EverythingCivil  6 років тому

      Its the curtailment rule. You can bend the bars at a distance of 0.1L from the centre of support. where L=span

    • @rajkiran1033
      @rajkiran1033 6 років тому

      Thanku

  • @aasifahsan4679
    @aasifahsan4679 4 роки тому

    In deflection check of both one-way and two-way slab, why percentage of steel is taken only for main reinforcement by ignoring addition of steel percentage of distribution? Reference [IS:456 2000, or any valid book following the IS Codes] >>> ANSWER WILL BE HIGHLY APPRECIATED

  • @mahendragupta2670
    @mahendragupta2670 6 років тому +1

    Sir steel ka lactures bhi upload karo

    • @EverythingCivil
      @EverythingCivil  6 років тому

      Yes. Steel series will start when the next semester begins i.e in june. You can tell me on what topic you want video?

  • @mukeshjat1573
    @mukeshjat1573 6 років тому

    👌👌👌👌

  • @sushmit2669
    @sushmit2669 4 роки тому

    L0 kya hai

  • @DesignReady.
    @DesignReady. 5 років тому

    Nice thanks

  • @backbenchers7187
    @backbenchers7187 4 роки тому

    60% will be 0.6 But u have taken 1.6 why??

  • @JitenderSingh-xk3bc
    @JitenderSingh-xk3bc 6 років тому

    Thank you so much

  • @sanyuktapawar8047
    @sanyuktapawar8047 2 роки тому +1

    Your answer for %p is wrong.. it should be 0.32%

  • @Jay12607
    @Jay12607 2 роки тому

    Asalem cheppavra nekina ardhamindha

  • @VickyKumar-bl2uq
    @VickyKumar-bl2uq 5 років тому

    Check for deflection

  • @sathasivams2350
    @sathasivams2350 3 роки тому

    you didnt explan if failure occurs what we have to change in design to over come the failure bcz i got failure in shear *SAD

    • @EverythingCivil
      @EverythingCivil  3 роки тому

      If shear failure happens you can increase the dia of shear steel.

  • @abhisheksagar4510
    @abhisheksagar4510 3 роки тому

    Pt calculated comes out to be . 32%

  • @kathirrihtak8832
    @kathirrihtak8832 6 років тому

    Please soil check video dalo sir

  • @komalkatore3356
    @komalkatore3356 4 роки тому

    For check u take overall depth ,rather than effective

  • @kartikmaheshwari2742
    @kartikmaheshwari2742 6 років тому +1

    Please check for your values before uploading your Videos, for example, pt% value, and there were mistakes in other videos too. Please keep a note of it.

  • @indrajitbag2579
    @indrajitbag2579 6 років тому

    Spacing is not according to drawing

    • @sanwaria
      @sanwaria 6 років тому

      its because we tend to provide maximum spacing not more than 300 mm at site. even if it is a distribution bar

  • @shoebshaikh7341
    @shoebshaikh7341 5 років тому

    Abe Lo ki value likhe bina hi check kr diyaa