Y'all remember that time when they tried to copyright The "Day of the dead"? You know, a religious holiday where people remember their deceased loved ones? Even the dead are not free from Disney's greed.
Still kinda shocked by that one. I thought they made a movie to celebrate Mexican culture, but I guess maybe they just wanted to steal the culture and copyright it.
It’s funny how after admitting that the Star Wars franchise was oversaturated they immediately began pumping over half a dozen tv shows and movies the second Mandolorian became popular
Honestly I kinda wish The Mandalorian flopped so that Mouse Wars could be finished for good, I don't really feel like it deserved a redemption like that.
“We have no obligation to make art. We have no obligation to make history. We have no obligation to make a statement. But to make money, it is often important to make history, to make art, or to make some significant statement. We must always make entertaining movies, and, if we make entertaining movies, at times, we will reliably make history, art, a statement or all three. We cannot expect numerous hits, but if every film has an original and imaginative concept, then we can be confident that something will break through.” - Michael Eisner, former Disney CEO So,If you feel Disney's been doing samey, money-grab shit, it's because they are, and it's lucrative for them!
And what sucks is the mandalorian is genuinely good. Disney should only stick to that and not put out any films for star wars because they can't seem to make even one good film for the franchise!
@@user-in1gv1uh2v some people here in america donr agree with you. I literally had to explain to a friend who was hesitant to eat at americanized chinese restruant because it was chinese. I had to explain the food comes from america but was served and cooked using recipes that are chinese.
@@enderwalkgang That's dumbasses, hardly just the US. I live in the middle east and due to ethnic tensions we have people doing hate crimes against their own due to mistaken identity. Edit: Not saying it isn't an issue, just saying that stupid people doing stupid stuff =/= consensus
Yall remember when Disney tried to trademark Dia de Muertos? A very important Mexican holiday where people honor and celebrate (while also remembering and mourning) the memories of the people they've lost and their ancestors that make up their legacies and family trees that existed long before Disney was even ever thought of? Yeah, me too
honestly the father who wanted the spiderman gravestone for his kid should have done it anyway. then disney would have looked even worse and probably would have backed down if they tried to do something about it to soften the blow.
They would have sued him for 10 million or something, and probability says they would have forced him into bankruptcy. Honestly, I would too. This grieving father is profitable!
@@the4tierbridge but again, think of the negative PR if they did that, they would be swamped by protesters, and ho boy the social media coverage would be a mad house
@@ntfoperative9432 who cares! It’s 10 million dollars! I get the cash, and it’ll blow over after at least 5 months! Of course, big corporations usually walk it off faster,
"they wanted to keep the innocence, and magic of the characters" yeah, remember when they had LITERAL SATAN Stan Lee made Peter Parker a normal teen and showed people that even you can make a difference under the guise of a colorful mask and catchy name, because "With great power comes great responsibility."
@@souljynx , Mephisto is the literal Devil in the Marvel comics, but yet in the shitty Scarlet Witch Disney+ series all Disney did with that character was spent $100 million on a boner joke, so yes Disney is the worst entertainment company in the West.
Disney Is like that old childhood friend you looked up to when you were little, but as you both grew older, its ugly side not only became more apparent, but actually the dominant one. And said friend uses the "remember the good ol' times?" as leverage to keep it going.
The fact that people ignore Mulan being filmed near concentration camps and Disney's blatant cash cow of live action nostalgia movies really annoys me. Just because it's for kids doesn't mean it's immune to criticism. That's like saying the minions are funny because they're loud.
Tbh it’s seems people are blinded by nostalgia when talking about what’s good and not for example sharkboy and lavagirl is a bad movie but people treat it like it’s a masterpiece
That would suck for the people working there. Yes, I'd feel bad for anyone that was not part of making a horrible response involving that genocide movement.
Yep. I am glad people started to appreciated that movie because it was damn good and IMO; the one time Disney put alot of effort of in terms of 2D & Disney in general. Yeah. There are others that had alot of effort; like Beauty and the Beast & The Lion King. But Hunchback of Notre Dame was more of it.
You know Disney is bad when Mickey Mouse is seen as nothing but a corporate mascot nowadays. It says a lot when South Park's portrayal of the character is scarily accurate to how the company is now.
Dia de los Muertos: A multi-day holiday involves family and friends gathering to pray for and to remember friends and family members who have died. Disney: You are NOT safe from our reign *Maniacal laughing* That's because you're only supposed to appear in our movie! YOU'RE NOT MEANT TO BE *REAL*, GET IT?! *More high-pitched maniacal laughing*
@I am Petitgguy They're bad, but Nestle is worse. It may just be my emotional attachment to Disney, but I just can't see them as bad as the company that tried to argue that water isn't a human right and killed babys in third world countries by tricking their mothers into using their formula over breast feeding.
The fact that they took out mushu, the best character in Mulan, for “racist” concerns, but openly affiliate with Chinese concentration camps and appease the racists in China is the biggest joke. Disney peaked in the early 2000s and went downhill FAST.
China actually did not like Mushu when the original was released so I could see why they removed him but the Phoenix was honestly such a boring replacement, like Hey Look at me I'm here for 5 seconds, follow me
I hated mushu in the original disney mulan just like a i hated the gargoyles in hunchback of notre dame, they only exist for comedy relief that is not funny at all, characters like those hurt the movie.
@@slifer875 At least my man Mushu was thematically coherently, correct to culture and had a character arc. The Phoenix? Not even an actual character, has the wrong fucking culture tied to it and has no thematic coherence at all
When i say i love Disney, i mean i love the work all the writers and animators that made my childhood and continue to make movies future generations will love. Not the producers, the CEOs or directors who profit off other people's labor and pain to feed their greed.
Think about how much they owe all those old rights-holders (Hans Christian Anderson, AA Milne, etc.) in legal fees due to copyright infringement based on their own tortured logic!
@@woollypidgeon1948 Technically speaking a citizen is bound by their nations laws where ever they go, however the nation where the violation occurs has priority. So in situations where no other nation has priority see murder in international waters, they have Jurisdiction. Sorry for being a bit pedantic
But they haven't, though, which he pointed out with their recent animated movies of the past decade. They can still do well in that regard. It's just that their live action stuff is a lot more cynical. They're moneymaking machines, so passion is on the bottom of the list of requirements. And when you don't have passion, the writing suffers.
@@frieza65 I think it's also because there are different producers in the live action movies, and there are much more pieces that need to move together, not to talk about much more money invested into them. They stumble every time there are big productions with a lot of people involved and the need to sell the final product at all costs(happened lately in animation as well, Frozen 2 for example). The Pirates movies were the last live action ones(talking about the first 3)that had truly strong\interesting female characters, ever since them, the writers have a raptus of dumbassery every time there is a female character involved. Rey is the least offensive\badly written of them all, but she's still not as good as a character like Elizabeth Swan in the Pirates movies.
That's their stated intention. They DEFINITELY don't care about "strong female characters", they care about political propaganda. Not a DROP of ANY of this stuff comes from good intentions, people need to wake the fuck up and realize this is a highly intentional, highly organized attack on our culture.
Disney's idea of a "strong female character" is to basically deny them the right to be a character, which is backwards, and because its Disney, this delusion is sold to the fans
@@toastpost554 Meatcayon's wabbit season video got taken down by warner brothers even though it looks nothing like the actual looney tunes cartoons so since they took it down people started saying the video was canon. I hope this somewhat explained it sorry if it doesn't I'm not good at explaining stuff.
Two things that aren't included that I remember. For one of the airbud movies Disney knowingly exposed many young puppies to a disease in the area. The puppies needed to be on IV drips between shots and many died or were permanently affected. Disney also threw lemmings off a cliff to perpetuate the old myth that they kill themselves during migration for one of their old nature documentaries. Disney had always been this way.
The second worst thing about Disney to me is how they've royally fucked up the public domain. Because God forbid Steamboat Willie becomes usable by anyone. (3/6/21: As a reply has pointed out, yeah, looking the other way towards China's fuckedupness is infinitely worse. The copyright thing just pisses me off first as a wannabe creator.
Copyrights are important, but Disnyed has fucked them so badly, heck they DON"T EVEN USE MICKEY ANYMORE. Sure goofy, donald, Scrooge Mc Duck are being use but MICKEY Is just rotting somewhere, Mickey doesn't even have key role in KINGDOM HEARTS Franchise, he is just there.
@@raulrojas9253 Copyright "Important" Ha maybe for Big Monopolies but NO ONE and i mean NO ONE ELSE Does it protect all it does is Harm It doesnt even matter if you are first at the patent if a BIg corp stole your design your SOL because you need to lawyer up and they can out money you and drag it on forever. Then there is the Copytrolls AKA the lawyers guild to kill innovation able to make Popcorn copy written and Stretch the definition of it to take sown a tire manufacturer.
While it's probably not as bad, Disney's also mistreated animators in the past and has now closed Blue Sky Studios, cancelling a film with a LGBT+ character they had in the works in the process and as many club penguin youtubers have pointed out, their greed basically killed their games in the end to the point they lied to Club Penguin Island employees, telling them they'll have two years at least with their job still, only to three weeks later, decide to let them all go and close Island, with one employee confirming if they were to continue working in the game development area, they would have relocate with their families due to there not being many jobs for game development in Kelowna and this was all after they basically let go of employees constantly with the original club penguin.
@@sonictennyson2201 They were working on the adaption of the book series, Nimona, which has LGBT+ characters, but despite being pretty close to completion and disney taking on that ice age thing that blue sky had also been working on, disney cancelled it
Disney in the 90s: We wanted our female protagonists to be fully fleshed out characters with struggles that anyone could relate to. Disney in the present: The manbabies didn’t like our strong, independent wahmen.
And this is a character who once admitted to having been molested so he could comfort a kid who'd been molested because someone at Marvel wanted to help readers who'd been molested realize it's not their fault. What's next? Are they gonna buy Darkhorse Comics & refuse to let Guts be shown in dark contexts by fans while continuing to frequently use child rape in his story & start advertising him to kids? That's the kind of shit they do with Marvel.
I find it painfully laughable that there is CANONICALLY a story where Spider-Man hangs out with and eventually reveals his identity to a child with cancer with only 2-3 days left to live, and Disney screws over someone with a similar story.
if i ever get famous, i'm gonna leave instructions in my will saying that anything i created (characters, music, etc) can enter the public domain when i die but that corporations are banned from using or buying the rights to them. especially disney.
I'm not going to do that after my death I'd just realese my characters to the public domain after 28 years because I want to see what people do with my characters
If I ever make cartoons for Disney, I’m going to write in a little clause that states that if I use anyone else’s cartoon characters that Disney owns, after the cartoon is done, the rights of the characters I use enter the public domain permanently. And Mickey Mouse is the major target I’m aiming for.
I’ve read that nobody hates disney more than J.R.R Tolkien, the author of the lord of the rings, he said that he found the company the way they make their movies to be condescending and cynical towards children. That before he dies, he told his heirs not to sell their rights to Disney.
Blame Lasseter for that, the green corrupted him so once he got the boot, Jennifer Lee and Pete Docter promised to move to original projects and relegating coming back to older movies via shorts ( Like the Dug shorts or the Pixar Popcorn shorts)
@I am Petitgguy I'm from the year 2050. After the plague wiped out half the population, Disney swooped right in and took over. Any companies they couldn't buy were swiftly crushed under their fist. And they became a full on dictatorship. No swearing, no resisting, and everytime you use a copyrighted word you must pay a fine to them. They want to maintain a family-friendly society that is run by corporate greed.
@I am Petitgguy Yes, they copyrighted oxygen and now sell bottled air. They also copyrighted the Bible and replaced Jesus with Mickey Mouse and Judas with Jeffrey Katzenberg.
I was a huge Disney fan. I grew up in the golden era so seeing what they are now is simply devastating. They took magic that was intended for everyone and monetized it to cater to a select few. I hope to see them turn it around but I'm not completely sure they can anymore.
Walt Disney wasn’t Anti-Semite,or racist to blacks. Yes there was blackface in Mickey’s Mellerdramer, and Jewish parody in The Three Little Pigs, but it’s odd that nobody claims that Robert Clampett hated African-Americans, reason being that one of his most famous cartoons, “Coal Black and De Sebben Dwarfs” Blacks are portrayed in a positive way, yet it’s now considered one of the Censored Eleven, and Disney’s Song Of The South portrayed African-Americans positively, and people called it racist. It shows that progressives aren’t helping the entertainment industry, they’re hurting it.
I remember a time when a music producer named San Holo was sued by Disney due to the name being similar to Han Solo. Long story short, San Holo won and got to keep his name. Same with the music producer Pluto. Yes, Disney sued a producer for the name Pluto! Except with Pluto, he didn't want to get in trouble, so he instead rebranded as Pluko. Disney has gotten really petty with their copyright system.
The copyright thing is the thing that bothers me the most. How on earth is it possible for a company to change the LAW in a way that only benefits themselves? How did it get passed at all? Truly greedy
Money is power, money is life, money is needed to get into political positions. Money can be used to pay off stuff when breaking the law... and pay the people who make little to no money as that money is far more valuable then enforcing the law as it ENSURES you and your family will live happily. It isn't even greed. In America you need money, and the older you get the more medical issues and in turn money you need. As prices go up but the income doesn't increase at the same rate means you need more money. It literally becomes a way out of a wheel of suffering and manipulation... by being manipulated. Let yourself become the pawn to protect those you love... Or let you and your loved ones suffer.
@@the4tierbridge , Bob Igor didn’t create Mickey Mouse because Walt Disney did, and considering that he was cremated and not cryogenically frozen then Mickey Mouse should be in the public domain already because Michael Eisner and Bog Igor went against all of Walt Disney’s wishes, and unless my family forces me to go see Disney films I have no desire to ever buy from Disney ever again.
You need money but also a justification. At least at first. The first copyright extension was justified to bring it up with Europe's. The next throw all pretense out though.
You know what's so awful about Disney's current state? Before Walt started the company, he was working with universal studios by making cartoon shorts. He made a character named Oswald the Rabbit. However, when Walt resigned from the studio, they decided that the character belonged to them unrightfully took his creation due to the fine print that never existed. You know what Walt did? He made his own animated studio so none of his characters or creations would be stolen by a greedy studio again. Walt Disney, The man who made this company, Started this giant superpower Because he couldn't do anything with his own work for a really long time. And it wouldn't have been that long if the company didn't keep pushing back copyright expiration dates. IT TOOK ALMOST A CENTURY TO GET BACK OSWALD, AND THEY COULD HAVE GOTTEN THOSE RIGHTS BACK.
People should use Mickey Mouse & any other Disney characters they can to promote stuff that pisses off China so a bunch of Disney stuff gets banned in China. And make sure to include Pooh in it.
The idea of the strong female hero is actually much older than the Disney movies you know. They are folktales about strong heroines who aren’t your average damsels in distress.
Unfortunately fandom stans don't care about any of this stuff as long as they get their fix. The fact that many films people say are bad are still in the ranks of the top 10 highest grossing films of all times proves that Disney doesn't really have too much to worry about.
The Mickey Mouse thing still makes no sense as the modern Disney Mickey is not Copyrighted but trademarked as a part of the company. Meaning that if Mickey dies end up in the public domain the most popular, well known, and beloved version would never enter it.
Then Disney’s mascot would be against his owner. Bob Iger has succumbed to the Darkness. With his heart filled with greed and the like. So could Bob Iger and Michael Eisner have their own Heartless?
Mascots aren't immune to copyright expiry. Mickey is both trademarked and copyrighted, but while Mickey the trademark can't expire, Mickey the character can.
Disney were one of the biggest reasons that I ever got into writing and drawing, as I grew up with their works. So their current actions just make me feel so horrible. The fact that they abuse their powers and do and support some exceedingly messed up things makes me feel sick. And what’s worse is that there is no solution. Even if a billion people boycotted their company forever, it would probably barely make a scratch on them. Thank you for getting the word out though. If more people know of their horrific acts, then they can be called out more and hopefully can change if enough people do it.
Well it doesn't help that problem with the same case as usual, people don't like to be talked down to, even if they are in the wrong and don't realize it and rather cherry-pick on what they want to listen or not listen on. And no matter what well thought out arguments are in the articles, reviews or videos, the general public either don't care because they ask "What does that have to with me?" and feels like useless pointless nonsense to those who aren't in the same field of niche or study of others.
You're not the only one. I honestly wish we could get old Disney back, the Disney that tried with their films and weren't the villians of their own story.
"I'm not gonna talk about the anti-Semite rumors". Thank friggin' GOODNESS. That shit has been debunked so many times and I've still seen people push it. Props to you, man.
@@the3dluxe53 No, it's because of the cartoons he made, like the nazi Donald Duck one. They weren't anti-semetic or Nazi propoganda. He wasn't a nazi. He also wasn't racist, at least not openly.
If I remember correctly, the anti-Semite stuff also came from Disney siding with Motion Picture Alliance, an anti-Semite organization. However, he sided with them due to his anti-communist ideals and recent labor disputes (I think?).
I’m glad you acknowledge how impossible it is to boycott a borderline monopoly. Change will be a snail’s pace, but you will feel a lot of relief addressing and discussing an injustice you’ve witnessed.
@@tittat5989 I get you were referencing Vivzie In general but I find it funny you use Hazbin as the example when it hasn't even gotten past its Pilot yet lol Meanwhile Helluva Is on episode 3
@@leef6234 Are you talking about the "Walt was a nazi sympathizer" BS? Because that's a myth. And I'm not saying this. Historians who studied him do Yes he might have been anti simetic but back then everyone was
You can still like Disney movies, theme parks, songs, videos games, and tv shows but not their business. Doesn’t mean that Disney fans are bad. This is coming from a Disney fan.
As time went I stopped seeing Disney is a good light and with recent events it’s like just stop said “they aren’t mouses , They are Rats!”. The best line I love from the former Star Wars actor for Finn , John Boyega said “ you ain’t gonna Disney + me and laughed a bit “ . Most people joke around saying Disney gonna own all of us one day and honestly it wouldn’t surprise me . They have almost a full monopoly on kids movies, it’s only a matter of time before illumination and maybe dream works gets purchased. Dream works probably won’t sell because the head man in charge Jeffrey Katzenberg hates Disney with a passion. So yea thanks for the video and maybe u can do one on either illumination, dream works or even Sony.
@@SlapstickGenius23 , I’m older than he is, but yet he has a deeper tone of voice than mine, so I find it a little hard to believe that Just Stop is only 17 or 18 years old.
Love that the Lion King remake doubled down on the implication that hyenas were a metaphor for poor people, only except instead of it being probably unintentional it became “the poors are hungry, and we can’t let them eat because then the 1% will have less”
This is why I can't take plots in movies about how "We can't let the public find out about this or there will be rebellion, we will be ruined" isn't realistic in the slightest. People like a thing, they defend a thing forever. Disney could be making concentration camps themselves with their own money and politicians would be too weak to stop them lest they get a smaller paycheck, the people wouldn't have the tools to get involved, and Disney has the money to make their own country and military if they wanted to. When is it finally too much?
@@100lovenana yeah up that will take Disney to do something awful for everyone to stop Like sopporting a genocide or something Ow WAIT I gauss people are just stupid
I still love many of Disney's films and cartoons, and the animators/actors that work hard to make them don't deserve the backlash. BUT, their lawyers, marketers, everything that makes Disney so greedy, lazy, and sometimes cruel/amoral deserves LOTS of criticism. Their priorities are SO messed up, it's scary.
Somebody pointed this out in your Mulan video, but Uighur is pronounces “we-gurr” not “wigger”. It’s important that we preserve the culture as much as possible.
I don’t know if this is a hot take or not, but I feel that Disney was generally a lot more progressive during the Renaissance era than they are now. Staff members have gone on record that a lot of the songs that were written for those movies were meant to be allegorical for LGBTQ+ people since a lot of the people that worked on them were closeted at the time. On top of that, I feel that pandering or money was less of a priority when it came to the messages those movies wanted to promote. You only need to look at the two different Milan movies to see that.
Mulan 1998 actually censored a lot of things since the director was Christian so they refused to show any Chinese religions in the movie since he was not comfortable with it
I think the UA-camr Schaffrillas Productions put it best: “I want Disney, the animation studio, to thrive. I want Disney, the corporation, to crash and burn.”
i think it's important to make a distinction between the creative team and the company. disney as a creative team, makes some amazing films. the corporate entity is the issue, not the creative team.
Yeah, this! Their creatives in the animated movie/tv show departments still turn out good stuff, Tangled, Moana, Inside Out, Coco, Soul, Gravity Falls, Big City Greens, Amphibia, Owl House, that sort of thing! Sadly, the corporate side of Disney and its money-hungry nature with business practices seem to get the company, including the talented creatives, painted in a bad light!
Just like Nintendo. Great games, but also terrible company. Entire fan projects made for free out of love for the series got forcibly cancelled. Also, the whole fiasco with the one of the latest Smash Melee tournaments
I’d like to say this includes the theme parks as well. The Imagineers behind the attractions are extremely talented and deserve all the credit they get for creative such immersive lands and rides.
Also, Lucasfilms and Marvel Entertainment are separate companies, they are not Disney. These are owned by Disney, and Disney has rights over their property and their distributions, but they are NOT Disney. The failures of Star Wars belong mostly to Lucasfilms and its execs, exactly like the failures of Marvel movies belong to Marvel Entertainment execs. Messy production is also, again, the fault of the single companies, not Disney. Disney itself is entirely guilty for Mulan, Frozen 2 etc...but not for Star Wars and Miss Marvel lol these kind of videos are always full of misinformation.
It's so silly when people defend companies with arguments like "look at all this great stuff they've created!" as if other people wouldn't have done it better without one massive company controlling everything
I truly feel like there needs to be a huge antitrust law to break up huge corporations like Disney, like an anti-monopoly law. Basically, just break Disney up into what it used to be: a large, yet small entertainment company, leaving them with their regular Disney assets, and that's it. Pixar becomes an independent animation studio again, Marvel Entertainment once again becomes its own corporation, and the same goes for 21st Century Fox, Lucasfilm, and the Jim Henson Company. I know this sounds too optimistic, but I just can't stand for big corporations to keep growing and growing until there's only one mega-monopoly, or worse, they become political entities like corporatocratic states, and I know that Disney is aiming to create one starting with Los Angeles or Anaheim, and Big Tech with Silicon Valley.
@@hannahzhou8531 it's really not terrible, you're trying to sympathize to a company with almost trillions of dollars while people are out there starving, maybe it'll even force them to make a good movie for once
That's not even optimistic that is just fantasy considering though countries have lots of power they don't have that much power considering Disneys liquid funds are on par with minor 1st world countries and if they did that no business would ever establish themselves in said country even if it is America
@@1j778 , Disney could just move all of their headquarters including Disney itself to Japan, and they’d not only make trillions of dollars without Chinese profits, but they’d also make new and creative stories that don’t pander to SJWS.
@@silverdamascus2023 , public domain how it’s supposed to work if nobody in the Walt Disney family is alive today then that means that Mickey Mouse is allowed to be used in any story any writer wants to do with Mickey Mouse. For example nobody alive today are from families of Ancient Athens and Ancient Spartan families, so if you wanted to make Kratos a Space Pirate fighting Marines and Bounty Hunters you’re allowed to do so whereas copyright laws from the very beginning of humanity only ever served to serve the big corporations like Disney.
@@RoronoaZoro-ur6hr Walt Disney still has grandchildren alive, but his creations should become public domain, starting with Mickey, especially since Mickey and everything else is owned by the Disney Company, not the Disney Family.
You can still buy that comic online, and it’s called Spider-Man Reigns, but the only thing that they censored out in the censored version of the comics were Peter Parker’s genitalia and Mary Jane’s genitalia, but yeah Just Stop isn’t making that up that Spider-Man killed Mary Jane with his radioactive semen.
@@tiamystic , the Spider-Man Reigns uncensored comic if you are able to find online whenever you’re shopping online usually cost a 100 dollars like how the uncensored Batman Damned uncensored also is 100 hundreds online, and it also showed Batman’s penis in the uncensored version being completely uncensored.
@@RoronoaZoro-ur6hr Hey I remember that Batman dick controversy! Never understood why a soft, average sized dick caused so much fuss. DC people are cowards, they should've left it where it was 😂
Once I see a headline that says that Disney is on the verge of/has filed for bankruptcy, I’m gonna stop whatever I’m doing and go get a glass of water so I can do a victory spittake.
Sadly, even in this "low point" of 2020 it's clear that we'll be dust in the ground by the time that happens. The only way someone can knock them out of the film scene is if that company managed to pioneer a whole new way to make movies that Disney couldn't keep up with and drowned them with their own success. And considering how Disney's responsible for the death of 2D animation via the exact same method, that would be a taste of the sweetest karma known to man.
Remember the time where Disney race swapped Ariel from The Little Mermaid and tried to create a false controversy from it? They legit tried to promote it through a false hate campaign
@@3monkeysinatrenchcoat543 You know...I never stuck with the MCU at all, not even in its glory days. People may say they're well written, but I will never forget (nor forgive) how much of a greedy action they represent: Disney buying everything including Marvel. We have to look at things deeper, there's horrible stuff going on behind the mask of colors and light
Captain Marvel was fun but it's blatantly uncaring fake feminism randomly thrown in everyone's faces was an annoyance. It was the most forced I've ever seen & yet came up so few times I don't know why they bothered.
The biggest travesty is that she was incorporated into the Infinity War credits scene at all and shoe-horned into Endgame. Nothing about her film, outside of "explaining that a character named Captain Marvel exists" even matters AT ALL to Endgame. I am sure the Russo Bros would be more than happy to prepare a version that didn't have her in it at all...her highlight scenes(rescuing Tony, helping subdue Thanos, destroying his ship, leading the female charge, almost stopping Thanos but failing) could ALL have been passed around to other characters. Thor could be in lightning form and get Tony. Thor, Hulk, War Machine can all have Thanos subdued. Pepper(the original MCU leading lady) could lead the female Avengers. Thor and Hulk could be the ones to destroy Thanos' ship and help make the final stand against Thanos before Tony has to step in.
@I am Petitgguy , that’s because the United States has always been an oligarchy, and we pretend to be a Constitutional republic/democracy whenever we’re really not.
@@starsparkle78 Pepsi wisely dumped its private military, which returned back to normal in Russian gov hands, instead of outright using it to break Coca Cola’s ass.
So as long as Disney doesn't fuck with the laws again, within this decade, the public can start using several iconic Disney characters in their own works. But knowing Disney, they're probably going to fight tooth and nail to extend the public domain length again.
Honestly, Disney may as well shoot the bullseye and make copyright indefinite. The previous laws have been so overt it borders on parody, and I could see them sliding enough money under the table to get on the lawmakers' good side. After all, what would most politicians care about a bunch of stupid books, films and animated characters? It's Benjamin Franklin they're going to please. And Disney won't have to worry about stirring the pot with widespread controversy ever again.
@@majine.2606 Well, there are plenty that want to make Copyright last indefinitely, and they try constantly. They want to kill things such as fair use and want to make it so people can't use any kind of copyrighted material in any way. It is never enough for these kinds of vultures, they just want more and more control. Thanks to them we now have things such as Article 13/17 in the EU for instance that they now want to bring into the US as well. In Japan meanwhile they are trying to make things such as cosplay a copyright infringement and require pay. And then there was that incident during the Clinton era that really showed what they are after. It truly has nothing to do with the creator, it is all for the big corporations. If you don't know, what happened was that one guy quietly snuck in a small amendment to an omnibus bill that no one noticed until after the fact. What that amendment did was that with just four words, all kind of copyrightable materials created by people would immediately fall under the ownership of the big labels. Although the fallout made sure it was removed, it made it clear that they really just want it all. They really want to make things such as independent creators and the like illegal. In short, if you create something, it belongs to them. And then the guy who made amendment was then hired and is now the boss of the RIAA. And really, things such as copyright, trademark and patent laws are now the biggest obstacles to innovation and progress. All they do nowadays is to hoard loads of them, simply for the sole reason that no one else can have them.
@@matteste All of this is true, and it makes me fearful of the day when even genuine new twists on public domain stories fall under copyright infringement. Like, how much can an adaptation of The Little Mermaid in the future really change to make it stand on its own, not infringing upon any other adaptations that have been made? Would having the little mermaid with red hair infringe upon copyright? Will having her voice get traded a specific way violate copyright? Even Disney's Aladdin made the change from infinite wishes of the genie to just three. It's scary to think of how much harder it will be for people to express themselves if all of this remains unchecked. People take inspirations from stories all the time, so I am a firm believer that the original model of 28 years is how it should be to this day. By no means am I saying Disney should make copyright indefinitely from a moral perspective, just that if lawmakers are always going to take their side every time they push the envelope, they may as well get it over with and stop dangling the carrot. Short of some anti-corporate revolution in Congress, I just don't see it changing anytime soon, regardless if Democrats or Republicans control things. I did not know about that attempted amendment to the bill, actually. Thank you for pointing it out, since it'll give me more ammunition to work with when I make my point to a lot of people who don't really seem to care about any of this. If you don't mind my asking, do you recall the name of the bill where this legislator attempted to pass it? I tried looking it up, but can't find anything.
@@matteste All further proof that the1% wants all the wealth in the world and for everything to belong to them. This is what being born into luxury does to people. It makes them selfish and blind to the plight of those below them.
@@majine.2606 It had no name. Like I said, it was a giant omnibus bill, and he tried to sneak in four small words that completely changed the meaning of one small paragraph. But I can give you some links discussing the topic. It's an old story, so it mostly serve archive purposes now, but like they say, those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. www.salon.com/2000/08/28/work_for_hire/ And here just a bonus further illustrating the whole heap of BS: www.techdirt.com/articles/20210126/10111946125/riaa-launches-brand-new-front-group-pretending-to-represent-independent-artists.shtml
Sometimes something beautiful gets ugly with time. They forget what made them and become the worst that can exist. The best thing sometimes, is to let it die.
They didn't remove Liu Yifei, because she's an incredibly huge name in the acting business in China. literally, every Chinese actress would've had to support the HK police if they didn't want blank listed and disappeared from public life in China.
Strong female characters these days means: -strip them of any femininity -make them basically male action heroes from the 90s -deflect any criticism of horrendous writing with „tRoLS aNd s3XiZts“ -profit?!
@@ddjsoyenby , Deadpool and the 2019 Joker film are both extremely edgy; the 2019 Joker is banned in China, and yet both films combined makes way more profits than the entire MCU films, so you can still being super edgy and making shit ton of profits at the same time, and it seems that only a multi billion dollar company like Disney fails to understand that.
@@RoronoaZoro-ur6hr ik i was talking about quality though, redo of healer is a perfect example it's edgy sure, but there's nothing else to it aside from being needlesly edgy.
Disney won't do that because more than 50% of their audience are children, so if they do something more adult they will lose 50% of the money they are already gaining. For a corporation anything that makes them earn less money than before that's a no no.
Speaking of the writing for the star wars sequels. George Lucas wrote a rough draft for them a couple years before Disney bought star wars... And they threw it all away.
I hate what Disney does, they put a “progressive character” in their movies but put them there for a short amount of time to get both American “advocates” and China audience. Bruh they just cut them out or dub over them for the Chinese. How do people fall for this?
1 disney has Zero right to say spider-man is their character, spider-man was created by steve ditko and stan lee, disney might make boring movies with a kid in a spiderman costume but they didn't create shit. 2 i found the captain america trilogy among the best the mCU has to offer, his first move didn't felt like the corporate souless shells that are the MCU movies, it felt like a great super hero movie like sam raimi spider-man or chirstopher reeve's superman. 3 the "strong confident women who needs no men" is the weakest character in moder fiction, the princess from 2D animated disney movies were stronger characters with flaws.....
The Star Wars sequels feel like two kids having an "infinity +1 vs invincibility forcefield" battle, generic, nonsensical and just trying to topple the other guy.
Y'all remember that time when they tried to copyright The "Day of the dead"? You know, a religious holiday where people remember their deceased loved ones? Even the dead are not free from Disney's greed.
And boy, the backlash was strong on that one.
Still kinda shocked by that one. I thought they made a movie to celebrate Mexican culture, but I guess maybe they just wanted to steal the culture and copyright it.
So did they failed to copyright
THAT WAS HILARIOUSLY STUPID?!
CHRISTMAS IS NOT TRADEMARKED...
LET'S OWN DIA DE LOS MUERTOS!
XD
no
w h a t
It’s funny how after admitting that the Star Wars franchise was oversaturated they immediately began pumping over half a dozen tv shows and movies the second Mandolorian became popular
I love the Mandalorian, but I'm not watching the book of Boba Fett. 1) I don't care. 2)... I just don't care.
Oh god remember star wars rebels?
Honestly I kinda wish The Mandalorian flopped so that Mouse Wars could be finished for good, I don't really feel like it deserved a redemption like that.
“We have no obligation to make art. We have no obligation to make history. We have no obligation to make a statement. But to make money, it is often important to make history, to make art, or to make some significant statement. We must always make entertaining movies, and, if we make entertaining movies, at times, we will reliably make history, art, a statement or all three.
We cannot expect numerous hits, but if every film has an original and imaginative concept, then we can be confident that something will break through.” - Michael Eisner, former Disney CEO
So,If you feel Disney's been doing samey, money-grab shit, it's because they are, and it's lucrative for them!
And what sucks is the mandalorian is genuinely good. Disney should only stick to that and not put out any films for star wars because they can't seem to make even one good film for the franchise!
As a Chinese, I need to say this: don’t hate us as a race, hate our government
As a American, trust me: we don't hate the people, just the people in charge.
@@user-in1gv1uh2v some people here in america donr agree with you. I literally had to explain to a friend who was hesitant to eat at americanized chinese restruant because it was chinese. I had to explain the food comes from america but was served and cooked using recipes that are chinese.
@@enderwalkgang You make a good point.
@@enderwalkgang That's dumbasses, hardly just the US. I live in the middle east and due to ethnic tensions we have people doing hate crimes against their own due to mistaken identity.
Edit: Not saying it isn't an issue, just saying that stupid people doing stupid stuff =/= consensus
Understood
Yall remember when Disney tried to trademark Dia de Muertos? A very important Mexican holiday where people honor and celebrate (while also remembering and mourning) the memories of the people they've lost and their ancestors that make up their legacies and family trees that existed long before Disney was even ever thought of? Yeah, me too
That's reason enough to revoke their corporate charter.
Seems that everyone forgot about it as soon as Coco came out and turned out to be really good. Naturally. 😔
It even existed way before the Spanish colonization, Even before 1492!
they really tried to gatekeep a holiday? that's absurd
The fuck!?
honestly the father who wanted the spiderman gravestone for his kid should have done it anyway. then disney would have looked even worse and probably would have backed down if they tried to do something about it to soften the blow.
Yeah because imagine the news spreading, " disney forces grieving father to take down his late son's tombstone because of image of Spiderman"
This!
They would have sued him for 10 million or something, and probability says they would have forced him into bankruptcy. Honestly, I would too. This grieving father is profitable!
@@the4tierbridge but again, think of the negative PR if they did that, they would be swamped by protesters, and ho boy the social media coverage would be a mad house
@@ntfoperative9432 who cares! It’s 10 million dollars! I get the cash, and it’ll blow over after at least 5 months! Of course, big corporations usually walk it off faster,
"they wanted to keep the innocence, and magic of the characters"
yeah, remember when they had LITERAL SATAN
Stan Lee made Peter Parker a normal teen and showed people that even you can make a difference under the guise of a colorful mask and catchy name, because "With great power comes great responsibility."
Tf you mean “literal Satan Stan lee” that guy was great
@@souljynx , Mephisto is the literal Devil in the Marvel comics, but yet in the shitty Scarlet Witch Disney+ series all Disney did with that character was spent $100 million on a boner joke, so yes Disney is the worst entertainment company in the West.
Sometimes, we all have to face the truth about the hash facts of reality.
Stan Lee: "With great power comes great responsibility"
Disney: "With great power comes a shit load of cash."
I think disney only caught ears on *"with great power"* and nothing else of that quote.
Disney Is like that old childhood friend you looked up to when you were little, but as you both grew older, its ugly side not only became more apparent, but actually the dominant one.
And said friend uses the "remember the good ol' times?" as leverage to keep it going.
Omg I read some drama story with what you just said as a theme. It was so fucking deppressing...
i have a childhood friend like that he sucks 😬
@@hey.its.ghost57 My God. Hope you either manage to get out of that or that he gets some help.
this sounds like a plot for muder-mystery oh wait it is! Detective Conan!
But we’re those good old days really wholesome?
Disney will milk a cash cow till it bleeds, then it will drain the blood from said cash cow like a vampire.
A cropprate framer vampire
@I am Petitgguy and not even human rights activists considering how they refuse to disavow the chinese govt.
@I am Petitgguy Then sell the blood of the cow and use it to buy another one (another classic movie), the cycle continues.....
Disney, the man, was pretty cool.
Disney, the corporation, is a soulless husk selling away the future for a quick buck in the present.
@@mariokarter13 Oh yeah definitely
I remember Alex Hirsch once wrote a tweet saying "If it doesn't end in a -vel or a wars Disney does not care."
They also don't care if a female doesn't have god-like powers.
The fact that people ignore Mulan being filmed near concentration camps and Disney's blatant cash cow of live action nostalgia movies really annoys me. Just because it's for kids doesn't mean it's immune to criticism. That's like saying the minions are funny because they're loud.
This.
I’m sorry it was filmed near a w h a t
You're 100% right.
agreed, but every us company kisses china's ass............while claiming they care about disadvantaged groups.
And that’s why I don’t pay for Disney plus (I just use my friends password 😈)
Remember kids, never trust your childhood out of nostalgia
I made that mistake with Dragon Ball super, so I'm not doing it again.
Tbh it’s seems people are blinded by nostalgia when talking about what’s good and not for example sharkboy and lavagirl is a bad movie but people treat it like it’s a masterpiece
@@Flome810 I love that movie but i've never heard anyone call it a masterpiece and if they did then they would be way off.
Im done that with disney, nestles, monster high,etc...massive regret
After watching Scarface, I'll never look on nostalgia ever again. Plus, that movie shows the true side of USA.
What if Disney just randomly went bankrupt and shut down? Could you imagine the massive power vacuum that would take place if that happened?
Þe orb shall finally be free from Disney's grasp.
(The word will finally be free from Disney's grasp)
That would suck for the people working there. Yes, I'd feel bad for anyone that was not part of making a horrible response involving that genocide movement.
@@CarloNassar Also the next big company would take their place.
@@nickrustyson8124
Oh, so you're not aware of how people will lose their jobs when a company shuts down?
@@CarloNassar No I mean the next big company would be the monopoly
Man this makes me appreciate The Hunchback of Notre Dame more for how ballsy and dark it was. They’d never make a film like that again.
Yep. I am glad people started to appreciated that movie because it was damn good and IMO; the one time Disney put alot of effort of in terms of 2D & Disney in general. Yeah. There are others that had alot of effort; like Beauty and the Beast & The Lion King. But Hunchback of Notre Dame was more of it.
I mean I am just glad they put a gypsy character in cause I am part gypsy.
Yet still getting G(?).
@@jacobrich4453 I mean, the original one was gypsy; but again, Aladdin was supposed to be Asian according to the original story xD
Nope
You know Disney is bad when Mickey Mouse is seen as nothing but a corporate mascot nowadays. It says a lot when South Park's portrayal of the character is scarily accurate to how the company is now.
ua-cam.com/video/c5uOCdjbleE/v-deo.html
Wow that's sad.
kittykittybangbang I was talking about the character, not the show.
@@jcheesecake And true.
Mickey: What the- WHY IS DISNEY PORTRAYING ME AS A HOMOSEXUAL?!?!!
Dia de los Muertos: A multi-day holiday involves family and friends gathering to pray for and to remember friends and family members who have died.
Disney: You are NOT safe from our reign *Maniacal laughing* That's because you're only supposed to appear in our movie! YOU'RE NOT MEANT TO BE *REAL*, GET IT?! *More high-pitched maniacal laughing*
It's funnier if you picture Mickey Mouse saying that.
@@Nicky2414 it feels like a South Park episode.
they are the Nestle of entertainment companies.
Nah, they're not that evil.
@I am Petitgguy They're bad, but Nestle is worse. It may just be my emotional attachment to Disney, but I just can't see them as bad as the company that tried to argue that water isn't a human right and killed babys in third world countries by tricking their mothers into using their formula over breast feeding.
@@umbrella3235 keep your love for the classics and question the remakes or just ignore them like I do.
@@jailcatjones3250 The only Disney remakes anyone should watch are the stage adaptations.
@@umbrella3235 Nestle is evil. Disney is evil, watered down to fit the entertainment industry.
The fact that they took out mushu, the best character in Mulan, for “racist” concerns, but openly affiliate with Chinese concentration camps and appease the racists in China is the biggest joke. Disney peaked in the early 2000s and went downhill FAST.
China actually did not like Mushu when the original was released so I could see why they removed him but the Phoenix was honestly such a boring replacement, like Hey Look at me I'm here for 5 seconds, follow me
I hated mushu in the original disney mulan just like a i hated the gargoyles in hunchback of notre dame, they only exist for comedy relief that is not funny at all, characters like those hurt the movie.
@@slifer875 At least my man Mushu was thematically coherently, correct to culture and had a character arc.
The Phoenix? Not even an actual character, has the wrong fucking culture tied to it and has no thematic coherence at all
@@slifer875 *WAS THAT AN UNPOPULAR OPINION I JUST SAW???* The first part anyway, fok those gargoyles.
@@OrionDawn15 i like the idea that mushu is selfish but wants to prove himself worthy, sadly he just a comedy relief that i didn't find funny.
When i say i love Disney, i mean i love the work all the writers and animators that made my childhood and continue to make movies future generations will love. Not the producers, the CEOs or directors who profit off other people's labor and pain to feed their greed.
Yeah, totally agree. I wish more people knew Disney fans like that.
It wouldn't hurt to specify, then. We like "Disney movies and shows"
Every single thought and discussion the higher ups at Disney have can be summarized by _”We’ve got to have..money.”_
Think about how much they owe all those old rights-holders (Hans Christian Anderson, AA Milne, etc.) in legal fees due to copyright infringement based on their own tortured logic!
We need moar moneh, Arthur!
🤣 were you a fly on the wall?! 🤣 hilarious!
Imagine making a movie so bad that the oppressed citizens of a totalitarian nightmare actively disregard the law to express how shit it is.
It's the irony. It goes to show how low the Disney company has gone.
I believe she said she lives in Canada in one of her videos
Now that's a power move
@@woollypidgeon1948 Technically speaking a citizen is bound by their nations laws where ever they go, however the nation where the violation occurs has priority. So in situations where no other nation has priority see murder in international waters, they have Jurisdiction.
Sorry for being a bit pedantic
LMAO
I genuinely believe they slammed THEIR copyright hammer on the Vader fan project because they knew it was better than their own movies.
Disney's spent so much time trying to make "strong female characters" I think they forgot how to make good characters in general
But they haven't, though, which he pointed out with their recent animated movies of the past decade. They can still do well in that regard. It's just that their live action stuff is a lot more cynical. They're moneymaking machines, so passion is on the bottom of the list of requirements. And when you don't have passion, the writing suffers.
@@frieza65 I think it's also because there are different producers in the live action movies, and there are much more pieces that need to move together, not to talk about much more money invested into them. They stumble every time there are big productions with a lot of people involved and the need to sell the final product at all costs(happened lately in animation as well, Frozen 2 for example).
The Pirates movies were the last live action ones(talking about the first 3)that had truly strong\interesting female characters, ever since them, the writers have a raptus of dumbassery every time there is a female character involved.
Rey is the least offensive\badly written of them all, but she's still not as good as a character like Elizabeth Swan in the Pirates movies.
That's their stated intention. They DEFINITELY don't care about "strong female characters", they care about political propaganda. Not a DROP of ANY of this stuff comes from good intentions, people need to wake the fuck up and realize this is a highly intentional, highly organized attack on our culture.
Disney's idea of a "strong female character" is to basically deny them the right to be a character, which is backwards, and because its Disney, this delusion is sold to the fans
My thoughts exactly…they have females but they don’t have *characters*
Remember if they delete this, it’s officially canon.
Why do I see this comment everywhere? I’m out of the loop
@@toastpost554 it's a shitty unoriginal comment, idiots call "a joke"
@@toastpost554 Meatcayon's wabbit season video got taken down by warner brothers even though it looks nothing like the actual looney tunes cartoons so since they took it down people started saying the video was canon. I hope this somewhat explained it sorry if it doesn't I'm not good at explaining stuff.
lmao
@@ALIEN-DUDE bruh its funny
Two things that aren't included that I remember. For one of the airbud movies Disney knowingly exposed many young puppies to a disease in the area. The puppies needed to be on IV drips between shots and many died or were permanently affected. Disney also threw lemmings off a cliff to perpetuate the old myth that they kill themselves during migration for one of their old nature documentaries. Disney had always been this way.
“You’ll never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy”
The only thing that comes close is nestle.
@I am Petitgguy
Not burnout. Abuse.
@I am Petitgguy correction, genocide
Congratulations for your accurate assessment of Pathetic Egotistical Tyrants for Animals.
@@ansrfururactions oh no. Nestle is *worse* than Disney. Trust me.
The second worst thing about Disney to me is how they've royally fucked up the public domain. Because God forbid Steamboat Willie becomes usable by anyone.
(3/6/21: As a reply has pointed out, yeah, looking the other way towards China's fuckedupness is infinitely worse. The copyright thing just pisses me off first as a wannabe creator.
Seriously
Copyright lobbying is getting ridiculous
@@Ramsey276one Copyright causes more harm than good in the age of Copytrolls and corpartae shills.
@@snintendog yeah, I got to 25:00
Copyrights are important, but Disnyed has fucked them so badly, heck they DON"T EVEN USE MICKEY ANYMORE.
Sure goofy, donald, Scrooge Mc Duck are being use but MICKEY Is just rotting somewhere, Mickey doesn't even have key role in KINGDOM HEARTS Franchise, he is just there.
@@raulrojas9253 Copyright "Important" Ha maybe for Big Monopolies but NO ONE and i mean NO ONE ELSE Does it protect all it does is Harm It doesnt even matter if you are first at the patent if a BIg corp stole your design your SOL because you need to lawyer up and they can out money you and drag it on forever. Then there is the Copytrolls AKA the lawyers guild to kill innovation able to make Popcorn copy written and Stretch the definition of it to take sown a tire manufacturer.
While it's probably not as bad, Disney's also mistreated animators in the past and has now closed Blue Sky Studios, cancelling a film with a LGBT+ character they had in the works in the process and as many club penguin youtubers have pointed out, their greed basically killed their games in the end to the point they lied to Club Penguin Island employees, telling them they'll have two years at least with their job still, only to three weeks later, decide to let them all go and close Island, with one employee confirming if they were to continue working in the game development area, they would have relocate with their families due to there not being many jobs for game development in Kelowna and this was all after they basically let go of employees constantly with the original club penguin.
Wait,what film with an lgbt+ character? I never heard that before
@@sonictennyson2201 They were working on the adaption of the book series, Nimona, which has LGBT+ characters, but despite being pretty close to completion and disney taking on that ice age thing that blue sky had also been working on, disney cancelled it
@@meganwillard4709 oh ok
Kelowna as in BC Kelowna? If so, neat
Yeah and them trying to use COVID as an excuse for shutting them down is just weak and transparently fake.
Disney in the 90s: We wanted our female protagonists to be fully fleshed out characters with struggles that anyone could relate to.
Disney in the present: The manbabies didn’t like our strong, independent wahmen.
Well, they aren't wrong.
Raya: Hold my beer.
*Who don't need no man.*
They aren’t wrong, there are quite a lot of man babies angry that women are becoming main characters.
ooh eeh im its not because their female but just bad characters.
Ah, because *that’s* the best image for Spider-Man!
Not caring about a child’s tragic death!
And this is a character who once admitted to having been molested so he could comfort a kid who'd been molested because someone at Marvel wanted to help readers who'd been molested realize it's not their fault.
What's next? Are they gonna buy Darkhorse Comics & refuse to let Guts be shown in dark contexts by fans while continuing to frequently use child rape in his story & start advertising him to kids? That's the kind of shit they do with Marvel.
That part pissed me off
I find it painfully laughable that there is CANONICALLY a story where Spider-Man hangs out with and eventually reveals his identity to a child with cancer with only 2-3 days left to live, and Disney screws over someone with a similar story.
And considering the reason he became Spider-Man is because of a family tragedy
if i ever get famous, i'm gonna leave instructions in my will saying that anything i created (characters, music, etc) can enter the public domain when i die but that corporations are banned from using or buying the rights to them. especially disney.
That's what Freddie Mercury did
I'm not going to do that after my death I'd just realese my characters to the public domain after 28 years because I want to see what people do with my characters
If I ever make cartoons for Disney, I’m going to write in a little clause that states that if I use anyone else’s cartoon characters that Disney owns, after the cartoon is done, the rights of the characters I use enter the public domain permanently.
And Mickey Mouse is the major target I’m aiming for.
I’ve read that nobody hates disney more than J.R.R Tolkien, the author of the lord of the rings, he said that he found the company the way they make their movies to be condescending and cynical towards children. That before he dies, he told his heirs not to sell their rights to Disney.
@@walkerphillips2818
Lmao rip Mickey Mouse
Honestly the thing I dislike most about disney is that it took Five years to get an original animated film.
Blame Lasseter for that, the green corrupted him so once he got the boot, Jennifer Lee and Pete Docter promised to move to original projects and relegating coming back to older movies via shorts ( Like the Dug shorts or the Pixar Popcorn shorts)
@@MathieuLeblanc1991 i recently see that disney is making a original movie animatef
@@soulhoney1908 Two of them are out this year, Raya and the Last Dragon and Encanto which will be set in Colombia
@@MathieuLeblanc1991 do you think they are the original
@@MathieuLeblanc1991 if this movie is set in colombia i just wish disney don't put stereotype
Can't wait to see Disney copyrights the word nostalgia
Doug Walker: *nervous laughter*
I am once again asking you *to not give them any ideas*
"Man, remember that show? It gives me such nnnnn....."
*sees security camera is recording*
"Nice feely old feelings?"
@I am Petitgguy I'm from the year 2050. After the plague wiped out half the population, Disney swooped right in and took over. Any companies they couldn't buy were swiftly crushed under their fist. And they became a full on dictatorship. No swearing, no resisting, and everytime you use a copyrighted word you must pay a fine to them. They want to maintain a family-friendly society that is run by corporate greed.
@I am Petitgguy Yes, they copyrighted oxygen and now sell bottled air. They also copyrighted the Bible and replaced Jesus with Mickey Mouse and Judas with Jeffrey Katzenberg.
I was a huge Disney fan. I grew up in the golden era so seeing what they are now is simply devastating. They took magic that was intended for everyone and monetized it to cater to a select few. I hope to see them turn it around but I'm not completely sure they can anymore.
Get new people working and new people in charge. If there's anything about a company, it's people that make decisions while working at the company.
"You either die a hero, or you love long ago to see yourself become the villain..."
It’s hilarious that has always been the most truthful statement made by the Dark Knight Trilogy.
Given the life of Walt Disney and a lot of the company's early works I'd say they were always a villain.
@@firewolfandrewb you beat me to it, the more I learn about Disney (both the man and the company as a whole) the more I hate it.
Or you're just a villain low-key from the get go lol
Walt Disney wasn’t Anti-Semite,or racist to blacks.
Yes there was blackface in Mickey’s Mellerdramer, and Jewish parody in The Three Little Pigs, but it’s odd that nobody claims that Robert Clampett hated African-Americans, reason being that one of his most famous cartoons, “Coal Black and De Sebben Dwarfs” Blacks are portrayed in a positive way, yet it’s now considered one of the Censored Eleven, and Disney’s Song Of The South portrayed African-Americans positively, and people called it racist.
It shows that progressives aren’t helping the entertainment industry, they’re hurting it.
When you realize the most evil Disney villian IS Disney
Many of the Disney villains' faces were based on Walt's appearance
@@matthewanderson3750 really?
So basically they’ve lived long enough to see themselves become it.
Dun dun dun.
Bob Iger is the real villain of the story.
I remember a time when a music producer named San Holo was sued by Disney due to the name being similar to Han Solo. Long story short, San Holo won and got to keep his name. Same with the music producer Pluto. Yes, Disney sued a producer for the name Pluto! Except with Pluto, he didn't want to get in trouble, so he instead rebranded as Pluko. Disney has gotten really petty with their copyright system.
Disney going to sue NASA to change the dwaf planet's name
The copyright thing is the thing that bothers me the most. How on earth is it possible for a company to change the LAW in a way that only benefits themselves? How did it get passed at all? Truly greedy
Did Disney please Sonny Bono or something else?
Correction: it benefits ANYONE who owns a character.
Money is power, money is life, money is needed to get into political positions.
Money can be used to pay off stuff when breaking the law... and pay the people who make little to no money as that money is far more valuable then enforcing the law as it ENSURES you and your family will live happily.
It isn't even greed.
In America you need money, and the older you get the more medical issues and in turn money you need.
As prices go up but the income doesn't increase at the same rate means you need more money.
It literally becomes a way out of a wheel of suffering and manipulation... by being manipulated.
Let yourself become the pawn to protect those you love...
Or let you and your loved ones suffer.
@@the4tierbridge , Bob Igor didn’t create Mickey Mouse because Walt Disney did, and considering that he was cremated and not cryogenically frozen then Mickey Mouse should be in the public domain already because Michael Eisner and Bog Igor went against all of Walt Disney’s wishes, and unless my family forces me to go see Disney films I have no desire to ever buy from Disney ever again.
You need money but also a justification. At least at first. The first copyright extension was justified to bring it up with Europe's. The next throw all pretense out though.
That Chinese-edited Black Panther poster is so damn bad it's actually creepy looking. What the actual hell?
Link please?
@@Ramsey276one It's in the video mate.
@@halfhawk718 yeah, got there afterwards
I feared I would need a closer view
NOPE
Full sized TERRIBLENESS
The things they do for money...
@@Ramsey276one This is why people needs to put a middle finger to Disney nowadays.
ikr
You know what's so awful about Disney's current state?
Before Walt started the company, he was working with universal studios by making cartoon shorts. He made a character named Oswald the Rabbit. However, when Walt resigned from the studio, they decided that the character belonged to them unrightfully took his creation due to the fine print that never existed.
You know what Walt did? He made his own animated studio so none of his characters or creations would be stolen by a greedy studio again.
Walt Disney, The man who made this company, Started this giant superpower Because he couldn't do anything with his own work for a really long time. And it wouldn't have been that long if the company didn't keep pushing back copyright expiration dates. IT TOOK ALMOST A CENTURY TO GET BACK OSWALD, AND THEY COULD HAVE GOTTEN THOSE RIGHTS BACK.
Yeah, no wonder he was the villain in the kingdom hearts game
When Mickey finally gets into the public domain I expect to see some real fun parodies or insanity! Something that would make disney upset!
People should use Mickey Mouse & any other Disney characters they can to promote stuff that pisses off China so a bunch of Disney stuff gets banned in China. And make sure to include Pooh in it.
This comment makes me want to see him in the public domain just so I can see the memes.
@@jcheesecake ALL OF THE MEMES!
@@rockclanhawkstar1454 heak yeah!!!
I mean, the ACTUAL character will be enter it long after we’re all dead. Steamboat Willie Mickey is like master Tom to Felix the Cat.
'Strong female characters' doesn't mean physically strong it's supposed mean written strong (but also cute buff ladies are great)
And yet, they never are written strong, sadly. Because if you have to say your character is strong, they probably aren't.
Cinderella was pretty strong to still keep positive under her stepmother rule
The idea of the strong female hero is actually much older than the Disney movies you know. They are folktales about strong heroines who aren’t your average damsels in distress.
(Ah, a fellow man of culture I see)
Ye
Unfortunately fandom stans don't care about any of this stuff as long as they get their fix. The fact that many films people say are bad are still in the ranks of the top 10 highest grossing films of all times proves that Disney doesn't really have too much to worry about.
The Mickey Mouse thing still makes no sense as the modern Disney Mickey is not Copyrighted but trademarked as a part of the company. Meaning that if Mickey dies end up in the public domain the most popular, well known, and beloved version would never enter it.
Then Disney’s mascot would be against his owner. Bob Iger has succumbed to the Darkness. With his heart filled with greed and the like. So could Bob Iger and Michael Eisner have their own Heartless?
Iger is actually worse than Eisner, because Eisner actually did a lot of good stuff until at least the early 2000s.
Mascots aren't immune to copyright expiry. Mickey is both trademarked and copyrighted, but while Mickey the trademark can't expire, Mickey the character can.
@@masterseal0418 That could be cool in the next kingdom hearts game.
@@SlapstickGenius23 Eisner was way better than Iger.
Flashbacks to the whole "Mickey Is watching" thing from the quackity club penguin island raid
Mike Whatever the fuck is cloning himself
*WW2 flashbacks occur*
BISS ON MICKEY FOREVER
Quackity has killed a Disney property. Never forget.
Quackity had changed and i prefer the old him :/
Funny thing about the whole Spider-Man scandal, Disney doesn't even OWN Spider-Man. Sony's the one with the rights.
Disney were one of the biggest reasons that I ever got into writing and drawing, as I grew up with their works. So their current actions just make me feel so horrible. The fact that they abuse their powers and do and support some exceedingly messed up things makes me feel sick.
And what’s worse is that there is no solution. Even if a billion people boycotted their company forever, it would probably barely make a scratch on them.
Thank you for getting the word out though. If more people know of their horrific acts, then they can be called out more and hopefully can change if enough people do it.
That's the problrm. Not enough people need do that, despite the fact that it's easy to look up building addresses on Google.
The fact Disney will probably never end and will be a forever lasting company makes me worry……..a lot
Please, I want more of this. I'm so sick of people ignoring Disney's and other companies' bullshit because MuH NoStAlGiA
the videos that are actually informative about how evil disney is get deleted very quickly. this shit isnt even the tip of the ice berg lol .
Well it doesn't help that problem with the same case as usual, people don't like to be talked down to, even if they are in the wrong and don't realize it and rather cherry-pick on what they want to listen or not listen on. And no matter what well thought out arguments are in the articles, reviews or videos, the general public either don't care because they ask "What does that have to with me?" and feels like useless pointless nonsense to those who aren't in the same field of niche or study of others.
They should go over the live-action films are not remakes or from their subsidiaries.
You're not the only one. I honestly wish we could get old Disney back, the Disney that tried with their films and weren't the villians of their own story.
@@ty-seansenior6660
Actually, even old Disney made more bad movies than good. Look at their live-action department at that time.
"I'm not gonna talk about the anti-Semite rumors".
Thank friggin' GOODNESS. That shit has been debunked so many times and I've still seen people push it. Props to you, man.
I think it just comes from the fact that Walt Disney bears a passing resemblance to Hitler. That’s pretty much it.
@@the3dluxe53 No, it's because of the cartoons he made, like the nazi Donald Duck one. They weren't anti-semetic or Nazi propoganda. He wasn't a nazi. He also wasn't racist, at least not openly.
If I remember correctly, the anti-Semite stuff also came from Disney siding with Motion Picture Alliance, an anti-Semite organization. However, he sided with them due to his anti-communist ideals and recent labor disputes (I think?).
Disney will buy youtube one day so be careful.
I pray that the one day that Disney does become too powerful is the day independent filmmakers pull what Hollywood did to Edison.
Nah, Alphabet will buy Disney like AOL-TimeWarner.
Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Though I would see it under a different name.
@@nicestoriesnottherealstori3006 I dunno why but that kinda reminds me of the DEN organization. (Effectively a UA-cam precursor for Hollywood)
I’m glad you acknowledge how impossible it is to boycott a borderline monopoly.
Change will be a snail’s pace, but you will feel a lot of relief addressing and discussing an injustice you’ve witnessed.
Painfully accurate
It's basically the story of the Hare and the Turtle: Only going forward without stopping, but ALSO with caution, we'll be able to succeed over them.
Well, with independent shows like Hazbin Hotel on UA-cam, there may be a revolution.
@@tittat5989 I get you were referencing Vivzie In general but I find it funny you use Hazbin as the example when it hasn't even gotten past its Pilot yet lol Meanwhile Helluva Is on episode 3
I think Nintendo is the only company that could realistically challenge Disney
"You're not a mouse you're a rat"-Matthew Patrick
Imagine the immense amount of crazy shit we could have if Xenomorphs were in public domain.
Alien vs. Predator vs. Steamboat Willie
Xenomorphs in the scp game would go wacky.
@@thepastaprogenitor851 ANYTHING could be an SCP if it werent for he copyright
@@GEMikeero Even rickroll because it never dies.
@@GEMikeero The false concept of IP and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
Walt Disney himself would be disgusted in how they treated his company
He genuinely wanted to make movies to make people happy.
This is so crazy it makes me envision copyright law being used against disney and shakespeare (no capital letters on purpose).
It's ironic because Disney has become exactly the kind of company that Walt was trying to escape from.
@@kingofcrap4414 Ironic and tragic
ok but we shouldn't idolize walt disney either, he held some pretty reprehensible views
@@leef6234 Are you talking about the "Walt was a nazi sympathizer" BS?
Because that's a myth. And I'm not saying this. Historians who studied him do
Yes he might have been anti simetic but back then everyone was
You can still like Disney movies, theme parks, songs, videos games, and tv shows but not their business. Doesn’t mean that Disney fans are bad. This is coming from a Disney fan.
Agreed 100%.
True
Then don't give them money.
If you're such a fan, maybe you shouldn't be crapping on it
Thats kind of controversial. By watching their films and stuff you're helping the company get more money, soo...
As time went I stopped seeing Disney is a good light and with recent events it’s like just stop said “they aren’t mouses , They are Rats!”. The best line I love from the former Star Wars actor for Finn , John Boyega said “ you ain’t gonna Disney + me and laughed a bit “ . Most people joke around saying Disney gonna own all of us one day and honestly it wouldn’t surprise me . They have almost a full monopoly on kids movies, it’s only a matter of time before illumination and maybe dream works gets purchased. Dream works probably won’t sell because the head man in charge Jeffrey Katzenberg hates Disney with a passion. So yea thanks for the video and maybe u can do one on either illumination, dream works or even Sony.
Well jeffrey hate it with a good reason
@@soulhoney1908 tru and a lot of movies from them jabbed at Disney so he doesn’t hide it
@@acemaison2834 what he say exactly about disney
@@soulhoney1908 no what I mean is like some movies are itself jabs at Disney. Good examples are movies like shrek and ANTS.
@@acemaison2834 oh yeah
Remember kids ur childhood is a lie
it’s JUST a matter of time
theres only a few disney films i like, and i dont even like mickey mouse lol
You're a lie. ;-;
@@mrboerger1620 this was the moment mr boerger realised that it was all lie and
In fact
milktea wasn’t real
（；゜０゜）
@@mrboerger1620 so am i
zulu was never real, we are all in a simulation
@@RadicalPogo64 yup. we are all in a simulation
Am I the only one surprised that he's 16-17 yrs old even tho he sounds way older
I’m older than him.
@@SlapstickGenius23 , I’m older than he is, but yet he has a deeper tone of voice than mine, so I find it a little hard to believe that Just Stop is only 17 or 18 years old.
Love that the Lion King remake doubled down on the implication that hyenas were a metaphor for poor people, only except instead of it being probably unintentional it became “the poors are hungry, and we can’t let them eat because then the 1% will have less”
Oh my gosh.
You're really reaching there, dude... so take your virtue signaling to Twitter and don't bother us decent people
If Disney really cared about pandering to China they wouldn't've made a live-action Winnie The Pooh movie
They did
Wtf, it's called Xi Ping's childhood! For some reason it's located in Britain.
I think they started making that before that controversy, and cancelling it would have been too much of a waste.
holy shit the movie actually didn't release in China for "obvious reason"
@@pradeepdungdung4379 yeah any representation of Winnie The Pooh is officially ban in China XD
29:35 Claud Frodo didn’t fall off a waterfall, he fell off Notre Dame Cathedral into a roaring, city-wide fire
This is why I can't take plots in movies about how "We can't let the public find out about this or there will be rebellion, we will be ruined" isn't realistic in the slightest. People like a thing, they defend a thing forever. Disney could be making concentration camps themselves with their own money and politicians would be too weak to stop them lest they get a smaller paycheck, the people wouldn't have the tools to get involved, and Disney has the money to make their own country and military if they wanted to.
When is it finally too much?
That's the only solution: STOP GIVING THEM MONEY
@@100lovenana yeah
up that will take Disney to do something awful for everyone to stop
Like sopporting a genocide or something
Ow WAIT
I gauss people are just stupid
"seeing the force awakens when I was 11"
me: does math
me: you're 17 and I feel OLD
I still love many of Disney's films and cartoons, and the animators/actors that work hard to make them don't deserve the backlash. BUT, their lawyers, marketers, everything that makes Disney so greedy, lazy, and sometimes cruel/amoral deserves LOTS of criticism. Their priorities are SO messed up, it's scary.
Somebody pointed this out in your Mulan video, but Uighur is pronounces “we-gurr” not “wigger”. It’s important that we preserve the culture as much as possible.
yeah him saying "yigger" repeatedly was... interesting to my ears haha
Lmao I was definitely confused the first time he said it
Thanks
Is the “Ui” part pronounced like “We” in the the word “Wet”?
@@ashleyloreto8790 No, the “Ui” is pronounced as in “We”, not “Wet”. Sorry I didn’t make that clear.
I don’t know if this is a hot take or not, but I feel that Disney was generally a lot more progressive during the Renaissance era than they are now. Staff members have gone on record that a lot of the songs that were written for those movies were meant to be allegorical for LGBTQ+ people since a lot of the people that worked on them were closeted at the time. On top of that, I feel that pandering or money was less of a priority when it came to the messages those movies wanted to promote. You only need to look at the two different Milan movies to see that.
Mulan 1998 actually censored a lot of things since the director was Christian so they refused to show any Chinese religions in the movie since he was not comfortable with it
@@MathieuLeblanc1991 but even with the censoring still it was a great movie, remove the religion will change nothing from the movie
The live action movie sure has no chinese religion in it either
@@woobgamer5210 so it's the same director
Literally everything was more progressive before it became cool to be progressive. that's not a hot take, it's common sense.
You can like Disney as a franchise, but not as a company.
True very true I like Disney as a franchise but not as a company Disney really has go downhill yare yare daze.
Disney:Fire James Gunn for making edgy tweets about pedophila long time ago
Also Disney:NAH Liu Yifei is cool with Hong Kong protest LETS KEEP HER
All I wanted was for them to bring back 2D animation and Oswald the lucky rabbit. Now what I want from them is much sadder then it use to be.
i want disney to stop meddling in CIA affairs and controlling the vast majority of cable news stations but hey we can both dream
Same
The last 2D movie was almost like 15 years
@@MASTEROFEVIL damn I wasn't even born that time
@@constahood2724 Thanks for making me feel old
everyone: how are you not dead yet?
disney: money
everyone: oh right...
Just stop I'm glad you haven't just stopped.
My breaking hurts
Can't process
Their biggest crime of all was having no Incredibles stuff at Disneyland at all prior to the announcement of the sequel.
I think the UA-camr Schaffrillas Productions put it best:
“I want Disney, the animation studio, to thrive.
I want Disney, the corporation, to crash and burn.”
i think it's important to make a distinction between the creative team and the company. disney as a creative team, makes some amazing films. the corporate entity is the issue, not the creative team.
Yeah, this!
Their creatives in the animated movie/tv show departments still turn out good stuff, Tangled, Moana, Inside Out, Coco, Soul, Gravity Falls, Big City Greens, Amphibia, Owl House, that sort of thing!
Sadly, the corporate side of Disney and its money-hungry nature with business practices seem to get the company, including the talented creatives, painted in a bad light!
Just like Nintendo.
Great games, but also terrible company.
Entire fan projects made for free out of love for the series got forcibly cancelled. Also, the whole fiasco with the one of the latest Smash Melee tournaments
I’d like to say this includes the theme parks as well. The Imagineers behind the attractions are extremely talented and deserve all the credit they get for creative such immersive lands and rides.
Also, Lucasfilms and Marvel Entertainment are separate companies, they are not Disney. These are owned by Disney, and Disney has rights over their property and their distributions, but they are NOT Disney.
The failures of Star Wars belong mostly to Lucasfilms and its execs, exactly like the failures of Marvel movies belong to Marvel Entertainment execs. Messy production is also, again, the fault of the single companies, not Disney.
Disney itself is entirely guilty for Mulan, Frozen 2 etc...but not for Star Wars and Miss Marvel lol these kind of videos are always full of misinformation.
oops my reply's not supposed to be here silly glitch.
It's so silly when people defend companies with arguments like "look at all this great stuff they've created!"
as if other people wouldn't have done it better without one massive company controlling everything
You mean 19683750 massive companies controlling everything.
🤣 true
Disney today can be summed up with "It has the three circles now, it's worth 10 times more. Please buy it."
I truly feel like there needs to be a huge antitrust law to break up huge corporations like Disney, like an anti-monopoly law. Basically, just break Disney up into what it used to be: a large, yet small entertainment company, leaving them with their regular Disney assets, and that's it. Pixar becomes an independent animation studio again, Marvel Entertainment once again becomes its own corporation, and the same goes for 21st Century Fox, Lucasfilm, and the Jim Henson Company. I know this sounds too optimistic, but I just can't stand for big corporations to keep growing and growing until there's only one mega-monopoly, or worse, they become political entities like corporatocratic states, and I know that Disney is aiming to create one starting with Los Angeles or Anaheim, and Big Tech with Silicon Valley.
Interesting thought. Though, Disney has never owned the Jim Henson Co., just the Muppets.
@@JohnPannozzi Hmm, alright. Then I suggest if Disney gets de-monopolized, the Muppets go back to the Jim Henson Company.
@@hannahzhou8531 it's really not terrible, you're trying to sympathize to a company with almost trillions of dollars while people are out there starving, maybe it'll even force them to make a good movie for once
That's not even optimistic that is just fantasy considering though countries have lots of power they don't have that much power considering Disneys liquid funds are on par with minor 1st world countries and if they did that no business would ever establish themselves in said country even if it is America
@@1j778 , Disney could just move all of their headquarters including Disney itself to Japan, and they’d not only make trillions of dollars without Chinese profits, but they’d also make new and creative stories that don’t pander to SJWS.
Never trust nostalgia.
It's one hell of a drug
Disney: "we are helping the creators by extending the copyright to 50 years AFTER the creator's death".
Yeah, I'm sure it really helps...
If the work is owned by a company, it ends 95 years after release, it used to be 75 years before, and 56 years way before.
@@silverdamascus2023 , public domain how it’s supposed to work if nobody in the Walt Disney family is alive today then that means that Mickey Mouse is allowed to be used in any story any writer wants to do with Mickey Mouse. For example nobody alive today are from families of Ancient Athens and Ancient Spartan families, so if you wanted to make Kratos a Space Pirate fighting Marines and Bounty Hunters you’re allowed to do so whereas copyright laws from the very beginning of humanity only ever served to serve the big corporations like Disney.
@@RoronoaZoro-ur6hr Walt Disney still has grandchildren alive, but his creations should become public domain, starting with Mickey, especially since Mickey and everything else is owned by the Disney Company, not the Disney Family.
29:51 “killed Mary Jane with his radioactive semen”
His. WHAT?!.
You can still buy that comic online, and it’s called Spider-Man Reigns, but the only thing that they censored out in the censored version of the comics were Peter Parker’s genitalia and Mary Jane’s genitalia, but yeah Just Stop isn’t making that up that Spider-Man killed Mary Jane with his radioactive semen.
@@RoronoaZoro-ur6hr *whydoesspidermensmutexist*
That's from the Spider-Man Reign comic
@@tiamystic , the Spider-Man Reigns uncensored comic if you are able to find online whenever you’re shopping online usually cost a 100 dollars like how the uncensored Batman Damned uncensored also is 100 hundreds online, and it also showed Batman’s penis in the uncensored version being completely uncensored.
@@RoronoaZoro-ur6hr Hey I remember that Batman dick controversy!
Never understood why a soft, average sized dick caused so much fuss. DC people are cowards, they should've left it where it was 😂
The magic is dead and the House of Mouse became a House of Rats.
Rats have standards. This is more like fucking Toxoplasma Gondii.
That’s an insult to the rats, my friend
Hahahahaha the sins of Disney. Boy, do I have some news for you:
If the Devil lives, he ain't in hell. He's running Disney.
Once I see a headline that says that Disney is on the verge of/has filed for bankruptcy, I’m gonna stop whatever I’m doing and go get a glass of water so I can do a victory spittake.
Disney will get taxpayer money to buy them out. It happens with Hollywood companies every few years.
Preach
Sadly, even in this "low point" of 2020 it's clear that we'll be dust in the ground by the time that happens. The only way someone can knock them out of the film scene is if that company managed to pioneer a whole new way to make movies that Disney couldn't keep up with and drowned them with their own success.
And considering how Disney's responsible for the death of 2D animation via the exact same method, that would be a taste of the sweetest karma known to man.
Remember the time where Disney race swapped Ariel from The Little Mermaid and tried to create a false controversy from it?
They legit tried to promote it through a false hate campaign
I would much rather see Once On This Island.
“MULAN! YOU ARE THE STRONGEST, INDEPENDENTEST, WOMANIST I HAVE EVER MET!”
Works every time
I lost nothing in skipping Captain Marvel as far as I can tell.
Aside from the skrulls, yeah. But then again, they only matter if you're sticking with the MCU after Endgame. I know I'm not
@@3monkeysinatrenchcoat543 You know...I never stuck with the MCU at all, not even in its glory days. People may say they're well written, but I will never forget (nor forgive) how much of a greedy action they represent: Disney buying everything including Marvel. We have to look at things deeper, there's horrible stuff going on behind the mask of colors and light
Captain Marvel was fun but it's blatantly uncaring fake feminism randomly thrown in everyone's faces was an annoyance. It was the most forced I've ever seen & yet came up so few times I don't know why they bothered.
The biggest travesty is that she was incorporated into the Infinity War credits scene at all and shoe-horned into Endgame.
Nothing about her film, outside of "explaining that a character named Captain Marvel exists" even matters AT ALL to Endgame. I am sure the Russo Bros would be more than happy to prepare a version that didn't have her in it at all...her highlight scenes(rescuing Tony, helping subdue Thanos, destroying his ship, leading the female charge, almost stopping Thanos but failing) could ALL have been passed around to other characters. Thor could be in lightning form and get Tony. Thor, Hulk, War Machine can all have Thanos subdued. Pepper(the original MCU leading lady) could lead the female Avengers. Thor and Hulk could be the ones to destroy Thanos' ship and help make the final stand against Thanos before Tony has to step in.
We wouldn't have lost anything if Captain Marvel never existed.
Disney turns into the Empire in the future calling it
Disney land literaly becomes a kingdom
I could see Disney buying Hasbro, Nickelodeon, and Sony Pictures
@I am Petitgguy , that’s because the United States has always been an oligarchy, and we pretend to be a Constitutional republic/democracy whenever we’re really not.
@Ariston Garza that was Pepsi
@@starsparkle78 Pepsi wisely dumped its private military, which returned back to normal in Russian gov hands, instead of outright using it to break Coca Cola’s ass.
Fun fact:
I got a Disney+ add on this video just to let you guys know
Bruh how are you the same age as me yet actually motivated to do things with your life
Legit. makes me wanna do more
Life is unpredictable
So as long as Disney doesn't fuck with the laws again, within this decade, the public can start using several iconic Disney characters in their own works.
But knowing Disney, they're probably going to fight tooth and nail to extend the public domain length again.
Honestly, Disney may as well shoot the bullseye and make copyright indefinite. The previous laws have been so overt it borders on parody, and I could see them sliding enough money under the table to get on the lawmakers' good side. After all, what would most politicians care about a bunch of stupid books, films and animated characters? It's Benjamin Franklin they're going to please. And Disney won't have to worry about stirring the pot with widespread controversy ever again.
@@majine.2606 Well, there are plenty that want to make Copyright last indefinitely, and they try constantly. They want to kill things such as fair use and want to make it so people can't use any kind of copyrighted material in any way. It is never enough for these kinds of vultures, they just want more and more control. Thanks to them we now have things such as Article 13/17 in the EU for instance that they now want to bring into the US as well. In Japan meanwhile they are trying to make things such as cosplay a copyright infringement and require pay.
And then there was that incident during the Clinton era that really showed what they are after. It truly has nothing to do with the creator, it is all for the big corporations. If you don't know, what happened was that one guy quietly snuck in a small amendment to an omnibus bill that no one noticed until after the fact. What that amendment did was that with just four words, all kind of copyrightable materials created by people would immediately fall under the ownership of the big labels. Although the fallout made sure it was removed, it made it clear that they really just want it all. They really want to make things such as independent creators and the like illegal. In short, if you create something, it belongs to them.
And then the guy who made amendment was then hired and is now the boss of the RIAA.
And really, things such as copyright, trademark and patent laws are now the biggest obstacles to innovation and progress. All they do nowadays is to hoard loads of them, simply for the sole reason that no one else can have them.
@@matteste All of this is true, and it makes me fearful of the day when even genuine new twists on public domain stories fall under copyright infringement. Like, how much can an adaptation of The Little Mermaid in the future really change to make it stand on its own, not infringing upon any other adaptations that have been made? Would having the little mermaid with red hair infringe upon copyright? Will having her voice get traded a specific way violate copyright? Even Disney's Aladdin made the change from infinite wishes of the genie to just three. It's scary to think of how much harder it will be for people to express themselves if all of this remains unchecked.
People take inspirations from stories all the time, so I am a firm believer that the original model of 28 years is how it should be to this day. By no means am I saying Disney should make copyright indefinitely from a moral perspective, just that if lawmakers are always going to take their side every time they push the envelope, they may as well get it over with and stop dangling the carrot. Short of some anti-corporate revolution in Congress, I just don't see it changing anytime soon, regardless if Democrats or Republicans control things.
I did not know about that attempted amendment to the bill, actually. Thank you for pointing it out, since it'll give me more ammunition to work with when I make my point to a lot of people who don't really seem to care about any of this. If you don't mind my asking, do you recall the name of the bill where this legislator attempted to pass it? I tried looking it up, but can't find anything.
@@matteste All further proof that the1% wants all the wealth in the world and for everything to belong to them. This is what being born into luxury does to people. It makes them selfish and blind to the plight of those below them.
@@majine.2606 It had no name. Like I said, it was a giant omnibus bill, and he tried to sneak in four small words that completely changed the meaning of one small paragraph. But I can give you some links discussing the topic. It's an old story, so it mostly serve archive purposes now, but like they say, those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
www.salon.com/2000/08/28/work_for_hire/
And here just a bonus further illustrating the whole heap of BS:
www.techdirt.com/articles/20210126/10111946125/riaa-launches-brand-new-front-group-pretending-to-represent-independent-artists.shtml
Sometimes something beautiful gets ugly with time. They forget what made them and become the worst that can exist. The best thing sometimes, is to let it die.
This is why even though I can't escape Disney, I refuse to defend them and will openly criticize them till the day I see justice
They didn't remove Liu Yifei, because she's an incredibly huge name in the acting business in China. literally, every Chinese actress would've had to support the HK police if they didn't want blank listed and disappeared from public life in China.
Sad but true.
Strong female characters these days means:
-strip them of any femininity
-make them basically male action heroes from the 90s
-deflect any criticism of horrendous writing with „tRoLS aNd s3XiZts“
-profit?!
Disney needs to let go of the pg-13 limitation and “The movie has to be understood by children” filter and allow directors to do what they would like.
it depends remember "more edgy, experimental etc. etc." does not always equal good.
@@ddjsoyenby Exactly, It’s especially seen in the sequels. They try to be edgy but still slap on the PG-13 filter, which ends up in a total mess.
@@ddjsoyenby , Deadpool and the 2019 Joker film are both extremely edgy; the 2019 Joker is banned in China, and yet both films combined makes way more profits than the entire MCU films, so you can still being super edgy and making shit ton of profits at the same time, and it seems that only a multi billion dollar company like Disney fails to understand that.
@@RoronoaZoro-ur6hr ik i was talking about quality though, redo of healer is a perfect example it's edgy sure, but there's nothing else to it aside from being needlesly edgy.
Disney won't do that because more than 50% of their audience are children, so if they do something more adult they will lose 50% of the money they are already gaining. For a corporation anything that makes them earn less money than before that's a no no.
Lesson today is: Everything is not what’s it seen...
Speaking of the writing for the star wars sequels. George Lucas wrote a rough draft for them a couple years before Disney bought star wars... And they threw it all away.
I hate what Disney does, they put a “progressive character” in their movies but put them there for a short amount of time to get both American “advocates” and China audience. Bruh they just cut them out or dub over them for the Chinese. How do people fall for this?
hope and false hope and denial
@@zannis5441 and ignorance!
1 disney has Zero right to say spider-man is their character, spider-man was created by steve ditko and stan lee, disney might make boring movies with a kid in a spiderman costume but they didn't create shit.
2 i found the captain america trilogy among the best the mCU has to offer, his first move didn't felt like the corporate souless shells that are the MCU movies, it felt like a great super hero movie like sam raimi spider-man or chirstopher reeve's superman.
3 the "strong confident women who needs no men" is the weakest character in moder fiction, the princess from 2D animated disney movies were stronger characters with flaws.....
The Star Wars sequels feel like two kids having an "infinity +1 vs invincibility forcefield" battle, generic, nonsensical and just trying to topple the other guy.
The kimba controversy was covered by yms which clears the whole thing up
Plus he brought up the whole Kimba controversy back in his video about how Fairy Tail is not rip off of One Piece.