Webinar: The DOs and DON'Ts of Conducting Workplace Investigations 1

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 11

  • @diannelennon4203
    @diannelennon4203 3 роки тому +3

    THANK YOU!! I was fired 8 days after I reported a one time incident of sexual harassment.. This was Soooo informative! THANK YOU!!

  • @tatiana.mp3
    @tatiana.mp3 2 роки тому +2

    Making a determination that behavior was "inappropriate" is subjective. I think making a determination as to whether or not company policy was violated is much more effective.

  • @michellewolfe770
    @michellewolfe770 Рік тому

    AND YES!! You ladies Delivered an amazing and very resourceful presentation. I am now feeling more confident going into my meeting!! Thank you!! I really do wanna know the answer to that question because that’s got me thinking!

  • @larrylamb3480
    @larrylamb3480 3 роки тому +3

    What of witnesses to an incident in which an employee was terminated refuse to give statements of what happened ? Is the fired employee entitled to those statements for his defense since his job was taken from him ? The witnesses are afraid of retaliation but they hold crucial evidence of what actually happened !

    • @123NopeNotMe
      @123NopeNotMe 2 роки тому +1

      If they write in your behalf they are now apart of that protected class and can also file a retaliation claim if they feel they have been retaliated against. It's all about context and perspective

  • @tocobien
    @tocobien 5 років тому +2

    Can those who file, an EEO and use it as a weapon get penalized? For example a Supervisor, speaks to an employee, employee continues to intentionally mess up. Employee then files a claim! EEO decides to restrict the Supervisor, pending an investigation. The supervisor has witnesses, in regards to the reprimanding. Why should the Supervisor be restricted pending the false allegation investigation?

  • @Heyymynameisjbells
    @Heyymynameisjbells 7 місяців тому

    Ethos interviewed me and then never followed up :(

  • @michellewolfe770
    @michellewolfe770 Рік тому

    Is the accuser allowed to ask the mediator/ attorney leading the investigative interview who it was specifically that made the 2nd alleged complaint for the soul purpose of transparency in understanding whether there is a hidden agenda. Also, can the Superintendent make or inquire other avenues of wrongdoings based on his personal opinion of the first alleged wrongdoing? And is the accused allowed to know that information because that would be very pertinent as it pertains to either wrongful termination or discrimination

  • @alexanderildefonzo6260
    @alexanderildefonzo6260 2 роки тому

    Educational

  • @michellewolfe770
    @michellewolfe770 Рік тому

    AND YES!! You ladies Delivered an amazing and very resourceful presentation. I am now feeling more confident going into my meeting!! Thank you!! I really do wanna know the answer to that question because that’s got me thinking!