Also 2023 is the 100th anniversary of the Farmall tractor’s introduction. I can’t believe how far they’ve come, from going from the farmall regular plowing the Midwest to the Case IH Steiger in Antarctica
@@rorschacht8478 DEF fluid gelling up. If you have a new diesel vehicle and live in the north you would know. You see Charles there has what you call a farm. At a farm there is these things called animals. I know its shocking but stay with me here. He has to feed those animals so you can go down to your local grocery store and feed yourself. When it gets cold, there is the government juice called DEF. Its mandated by them to make sure his diesel equipment since 2014 has it on so he doesn't roll coal while he feeds his live stock aka (the animals) If he cant start his equipment to go and feed those animals, then they will die. And then the processor wont have any work cutting up the meat that the grocery store buys so you can feed yourself with. Make sense?
@@stefgrootlipman69 im making a point that emissions regulations don’t mean anything to the governments. Military and all don’t have to follow regs. It’s all about money.
@@DaddyStarbuck emissions will always be a problem. If you did your research, those Tractors have systems that drastically reduce their emissions and sacrifices efficiency.
@@hughmarcus1 No, you inbred. Research in Antarctica is obviously specifically regulated. They don't follow the rules and regulations of any specific country, it's a joint operation.
Worst thing about Case, caterpillar, John Deere etc, is how bad you get paid to move them. I ran my own heavy haul semi and trailer and I wouldn't touch any of it. There we so many brokers between Case and the truck you barely made a profit moving it. 2 dollars a mile after permits? Sickening
They will go on craigslist... "High run time but operated only in ideal weather conditions, usually just idled and used to push a snow plow once a month or so, no low-ball offers, I know what I have"
What was any other method after? I'm just curious, because it seems like this, or what you have mentioned is the best option on ice, or really any other terrain period... besides marsh lol
Have seen them in the arctic before. A mine had 2 of them and the mine blew up both transmissions and had issues with exsposed control modules. Also rocks are a big issue with the tracks. There kind of overrated.
@@Bowiiihowdy yea, at least in antarctica they (mostly) don't have to deal with rocks, just cold and snow (tho ice can sometimes be just as hard as rocks)
A few points, It is pronounced "An-tarc-tica" Tasmania is part of Australia not just some random place south of Australia. They are Australian tractors now so all the whingers who are complaining about the US government paying are wrong. There actually is a world outside the US. Hell they even have the Australian Antarctic Program stickers on them. I think that you'll find Australia has the biggest share of Antarctica at 42% of surface area.
Those fuel tanks must be upgraded to hold more fuel, must be nice. Normal farmers can’t have that luxury off the lot? And yea DPF delete and maybe put a bunch of heat tape on the hydraulic hoses and heaters in the trans/hydraulic tank and then they good to go work in the cold. No track mods. Be cool to see studded tracks, especially for pushing snow on top of ice. Rubber and ice don’t mix well.
@@Dr.IanPlect The drive long distance of a few hundred miles while towing heavy sled, you dont want to run out of fuel there and have to abandon the tractor and the supplys.
No they can't ( almost can't ) so they have to use different kind of fule or heated fule tanks ( but heated fuel tank means you have to keep engine running 24×7 ) so modification to engines and different kind of hydraulic oil and different kind of tracks ( so they don't get hard ) and that's why they have to remove emission type of things. And still it's not done yet ( laughs to the people arguing for emissions )
@@GOOD_FARMER The tractors in the US program run on AN8, and no, they don't have to remove the DEF systems. The tracks are standard, and in my observation, -45F is when they start to have trouble. It doesn't get below -40 at McMurdo very often, but when it does, there isn't much operating of these tractors.
The brand new tractors in the video are for the Australians, so they didn't cost the American taxpayers anything. Most of the footage however is from the USAP, which has an annual budget of around $500 million. The budget that was just approved for the US military in 2023? $850 billion or 1700x more, and that's even $45 billion more than what the president asked for. The USAP did take delivery of two new MTS quads early in 2022, but I can tell you that it was time. I think the newest Case quad there is about a 2010 model, and none of them have fewer than 15000 hours on them. One of them certainly has over 20k hours.
Nah not really, Arctic operations are pretty important, just because you don’t understand or know what they do and are ignorant doesn’t make it wasteful.
Probably cause people don't like the government forcing bullshit on them and then the government doing whatever they please, rules for thee not for me tends to make people a bit salty
@OP It's a "neutral" whateversomething now, which is just pretend because in reality they got staked out areas but think of it like a campground. You got your campsite until you move. If you really want to bake your noodle, tho, look up pre-1945 maps. :) The reason for the change is the globalists run all these countries so they don't see a need to have conflicts and wars in an area with no people to manipulate. Modern wars are not about resources and land anymore, they about population control and wealth transfer.
It's case new Holland. CNH , but also CIH. It's funny. Case and new Holland merged a few years ago. I know just cause a friend of mine invented something used on their combines that are sold as case IH combines but the award came from case new Holland CNH. Confusing isn't it
Actually Case did not merge with New Holland. Case went out of the Agricultural business years ago. Tenneco bought IH and Case Ag. way back in the 1980s and merged them. Fiat bought the company after that and bought NH and merged them in there too. Like you said - Confusing to say the least.
It was more than a few years ago, it was 23 years ago to be specific. It is confusing, so I think a better explanation is needed to understand it... Tenneco spun off the Case and CaseIH lines into a new independent company called "Case Corp" in 1994. That company only remained independent for five years, as Fiat acquired it in 1999 and merged it with New Holland, which they had bought from Ford in 1991, forming the new subsidiary "CNH Global". Although the letters obviously come from Case and New Holland, the term "Case New Holland" has never been officially used; it is just "CNH". Next in 2011, parent Fiat SpA spun off Iveco and FPT Industrial (from Fiat Powertrain Technologies) into a new independent company called Fiat Industrial. Two years later in 2013, CNH Global was also removed from Fiat SpA and merged into Fiat Industrial, which then changed its name to CNH Industrial. That is how it stands today in 2022: CaseIH, Case, New Holland, and Steyr are the brands of CNH Industrial, an independent publicly traded company headquartered in the UK, but traded on the New York Stock Exchange and an Italian stock exchange. Although CNH is corporately no longer part of Fiat, (just to add one more piece of confusion) the Agnelli family who owns most of the stock of Fiat also owns most of the stock of CNH Industrial, so they are still unofficially "related" in that way. Take a look at the current CNH Industrial logo. To make the I for "Industrial", the black letter H has a red square dot over it, reminiscent of the logo IH used from 1946 to 1985, clearly and rightly a tribute to International Harvester.
@@mattstarzec4143 Case never went out of the agricultural business, they always built and sold farm tractors. All other Case agriculture equipment besides tractors was ended by parent Tenneco in 1972, the same year Tenneco bought David Brown tractors and merged them into Case, which it had acquired five years earlier. The JI Case Company ceased to be independent way back in 1964, when it was purchased by the Kern County Land Company of California. Tenneco bought Case (the entire company including construction and lawn & garden, not just ag equipment) well before the 1980's, buying all of Kern County Land Co three years later in 1967. Tenneco later bought just the agricultural assets of International Harvester (not the entire company) in November 1984, then finally exited the farm equipment business in 1994, as per my previous reply.
Gosh, my neighbor has been by all week in his JD, hauling bales for his cattle... -25 for the past 3 days, and it looks to be running just fine... Whoops!
new 535's to push snow, talk about overkill. i can grantee no maintenance worker is sitting that cab long enough to burn all that fuel in those expanded tanks. they run 12+ hours doing real field work with stock tanks. all that said i can't argue with their taste.
The expanded tanks are probably for the multi day journey between bases, after all 12+ hours of field work may not take a full tank, but 48+ of pulling 6 sleds probably will. Plus in antarctica, or anywhere remote, better to have too much fuel than not enough
Don't you call those beautiful red machines "Case" tractors. They are CaseIH tractors! Emphasis on the IH, that's where the brand really came from, and why they are red. Leaving out the "IH" when you speak the brand's name is blasphemy.
Actually, these models are part of Steiger technology and lineage, not International Harvester. Case IH bought Steiger in 1986 and got the heavy tractor technology.
@@stevangucu522 As my comment says, the entire BRAND really came from IH, not those specific tractors in the video. But about that... Steiger built IH articulated 4WDs since the 4366 beginning in 1973. So although the acquisition of Steiger didn't occur until after the Case-IH "merger", the relationship and experience with Steiger was from International Harvester too!
@@stevangucu522 No ,you're wrong.IH bought a 3rd stake in Steiger back in the 70's and the relationship passed on to Case-IH in the 80's with Case-IH aquiring Steiger.
@chipps1066 Even if IH bought 1/3rd of Steiger, it continued its own line of tractors until the full merger. Also, IH wasn't the only company Steiger gave articulated technology, it went to numerous small companies and big companies, even in East Bloc like Hungarian Raba-Steiger.
Call them and tell them that then, maybe they'll promote you to head of their resource and equipment division. Or, maybe they've already considered other options and your intellectually impaired brain can't fathom that other people probably have a greater understanding of this than you.
I can't speak for the Australians, and that's who these new tractors in the video are for. The US program however needs them for their weight, mostly. Occasionally, one of them will be taken out on the South Pole Traverse as well, and that size tractor is nice to have in comparison to the standard MT865C that is used for the traverse. The US's Case Quadtracs are nearly all tired out though, and they took delivery of two new MTS quads early this year.
Yes way to go caseiH your an awesome company and build great equipment. And as far as you guys complaining about the dpf you need to take that up our government and the old guy in the white house they sent the rules the equipment manufacturers weather it's agriculture or commercial have to work in the guidelines that they sre given. Now as far as Antarctica maybe they have different laws regarding emissions over there I just think it great that caseih has been building tractors for them for 20 years awsome.
... they are required for operations in antartica. of all things to get upset about in terms of tax money poorly spent, thats probably the dumbest hill top die on.
@Dusin Bonnema If you're so intellectually impaired that you must oppose anything and everything that your welfare "tax dollars" gets spent on, it's probably a great idea to just stfu.
@@katraapplesauce1203 no, it’s okay to voice frustration about another example among thousands at all government levels of “poorly spent” taxpayer dollars. “research” is a common carte blanche
Also 2023 is the 100th anniversary of the Farmall tractor’s introduction. I can’t believe how far they’ve come, from going from the farmall regular plowing the Midwest to the Case IH Steiger in Antarctica
Actually they're owned by FIAT now
Specially modified.. def dpf delete. Lol
has Case IH found a way to stop the Diesel exhaust fluid from gelling in the Antarctic up or were they exempted from the law???
Of course they were exempt. But those of us who have starving animals because our fucking def froze. Nope
@@charlestischer7538 wtf are you talking about?
@@rorschacht8478 DEF fluid gelling up. If you have a new diesel vehicle and live in the north you would know. You see Charles there has what you call a farm. At a farm there is these things called animals. I know its shocking but stay with me here. He has to feed those animals so you can go down to your local grocery store and feed yourself. When it gets cold, there is the government juice called DEF. Its mandated by them to make sure his diesel equipment since 2014 has it on so he doesn't roll coal while he feeds his live stock aka (the animals) If he cant start his equipment to go and feed those animals, then they will die. And then the processor wont have any work cutting up the meat that the grocery store buys so you can feed yourself with.
Make sense?
just asking on behalf of all farmers
@@robdavis1176 the 856 still runs, and it’s 50 or so years old.
No emissions stuff for sure.
Is this paid through government as well? Ironic, isn't it...
ofcourse not, don't think adblue will work in that cold
@@stefgrootlipman69 im making a point that emissions regulations don’t mean anything to the governments. Military and all don’t have to follow regs. It’s all about money.
@@DaddyStarbuck government ploy at this point... Above the laws they put forth
@@DaddyStarbuck emissions will always be a problem. If you did your research, those Tractors have systems that drastically reduce their emissions and sacrifices efficiency.
Definitely no emissions junk on these ones.
Remove dpf and load them up.
Yep, funny there is no SCR or DPF's on those tractors. LOL🤣😂
Export only... and Antarctica does not have ignorant EPA regulations
The government doesn't follow its own EPA laws. Those are just for us common folks.
@@glennschlorf1285 They’re probably Australian spec. As far as I know Australia doesn’t have as tight emissions regulations as the US & Europe.
@@hughmarcus1 No, you inbred. Research in Antarctica is obviously specifically regulated. They don't follow the rules and regulations of any specific country, it's a joint operation.
Worst thing about Case, caterpillar, John Deere etc, is how bad you get paid to move them. I ran my own heavy haul semi and trailer and I wouldn't touch any of it. There we so many brokers between Case and the truck you barely made a profit moving it. 2 dollars a mile after permits? Sickening
Id buy one for sure if they didnt have def. Probably a 480
ARE THESE EMISSION COMPLIANT?
Well, Antartica don't have any laws about emisions so.....
The lady said after the modifications.
Pushed plenty of snow with one of these. Work great!!
I guess they get special treatment since they work for the government. No dpf or emissions like everyone else.
What happens to these units after they are done in antarctica?
They definitely wont be abandoned there
They will never end that mission becose its inposible do in dangerous weather -100, its white dead for everyone who try
@@titityytyler01 people are there rn bro you good? They got like special houses and stuff for the cold
Iv seen alot of abandoned equipment in the arctic. I wouldn't be surprised if they were left.
They will go on craigslist... "High run time but operated only in ideal weather conditions, usually just idled and used to push a snow plow once a month or so, no low-ball offers, I know what I have"
I guess the folks in Racine, wi must feel left out of all this
Popsicle farming.
Penguin farming
Ha ha good one!!
I wonder what them people down in the artic are actually doing?
Just trying to do some fall tillage for corn and soybeans!!😉👌👌😂
Odds are they are wasting yours and my tax dollars.
easy! looking for oil and natural gas
@@danw6014beat me to it.
Drinking
Bringing back the old school "CAT train" where Bulldozers used to pull around all sorts of things in Alaska
What was any other method after? I'm just curious, because it seems like this, or what you have mentioned is the best option on ice, or really any other terrain period... besides marsh lol
Take that John Deere
Have seen them in the arctic before. A mine had 2 of them and the mine blew up both transmissions and had issues with exsposed control modules. Also rocks are a big issue with the tracks. There kind of overrated.
Mining is a bit hard on tractors haha
@@Bowiiihowdy yea, at least in antarctica they (mostly) don't have to deal with rocks, just cold and snow (tho ice can sometimes be just as hard as rocks)
And of course they include almost none of the actual technical details that I watched this video to find out.
I wonder why its getting warmer up there...
Humans haven't existed long enough to say climate change..... Everything happens in cycles... Brainwashed
I’ll take 2, one for pushing snow and a spare of course
New case add, "Our heaters work REALLY well" lol
I think a fergie 28 with tracks on would be fine!
As used by Sir Ed Hillary N Z
A few points,
It is pronounced
"An-tarc-tica"
Tasmania is part of Australia not just some random place south of Australia.
They are Australian tractors now so all the whingers who are complaining about the US government paying are wrong.
There actually is a world outside the US.
Hell they even have the Australian Antarctic Program stickers on them.
I think that you'll find Australia has the biggest share of Antarctica at 42% of surface area.
'Ant-artica' and 'Nookyaler' seem to be mispronounced more often than they are correctly pronounced
Americans always pronounce words incorrectly and it bugs the shot out of me
The U.S probably still paid for it, have you seen the president?
Australia sucks
@@TheJessfletcher17 compared to where and what's your proof?
Those fuel tanks must be upgraded to hold more fuel, must be nice. Normal farmers can’t have that luxury off the lot? And yea DPF delete and maybe put a bunch of heat tape on the hydraulic hoses and heaters in the trans/hydraulic tank and then they good to go work in the cold. No track mods. Be cool to see studded tracks, especially for pushing snow on top of ice. Rubber and ice don’t mix well.
I don't see why more fuel capacity is necessary.
@@Dr.IanPlect …because it’s Antarctica
@@funny3scene That explains NIL, and stop thumbing up your own comments.
@@Dr.IanPlect who else is going to like it 🙃
@@Dr.IanPlect The drive long distance of a few hundred miles while towing heavy sled, you dont want to run out of fuel there and have to abandon the tractor and the supplys.
Hopefully they finf the big exploration vecle
those big land/snow trains? is that what you're talking about?
I bet the Tier 4 regen system was removed they went to Antarctica!
Who's the country bumpkin presenting?
How in gods name do they flow diesel at -71?
No they can't ( almost can't ) so they have to use different kind of fule or heated fule tanks ( but heated fuel tank means you have to keep engine running 24×7 ) so modification to engines and different kind of hydraulic oil and different kind of tracks ( so they don't get hard ) and that's why they have to remove emission type of things. And still it's not done yet ( laughs to the people arguing for emissions )
@@GOOD_FARMER The tractors in the US program run on AN8, and no, they don't have to remove the DEF systems. The tracks are standard, and in my observation, -45F is when they start to have trouble. It doesn't get below -40 at McMurdo very often, but when it does, there isn't much operating of these tractors.
talk about a cold start. good lord
Engine is life
Hard work with scab wprkers lol
For what ?
Aye I’m in this video!
How
A bunch of salty farmers here complaining
Yup they don't even know how to start engine at that temperature.
And neither of you can see the issue they are complaining about
I'm gonna buy one of these to farm cocaine!!
Hell yea
With a last name like ramos I’m tempted to actually believe that
brava brava
How bout thanks to the American tax payer funding all this high priced equipment.
The brand new tractors in the video are for the Australians, so they didn't cost the American taxpayers anything. Most of the footage however is from the USAP, which has an annual budget of around $500 million. The budget that was just approved for the US military in 2023? $850 billion or 1700x more, and that's even $45 billion more than what the president asked for. The USAP did take delivery of two new MTS quads early in 2022, but I can tell you that it was time. I think the newest Case quad there is about a 2010 model, and none of them have fewer than 15000 hours on them. One of them certainly has over 20k hours.
Hey see if you can find that secret ufo base down there while youre at it.
cool, literally =)
Sounds like they are planning a new trip to the edge of God's firmament. Of course all this on our tax $.
Woe woe woe! Those tractors run on diesel fuel and other petroleum products. They are melting the polar ice caps 🥴
For your information there is a huge polar base already polluting Antarctica.
Only just a million
Stop pollution in Antarctica ! Too much human presence there !
😂
Talk about a waste of money. Unreal
Nah not really, Arctic operations are pretty important, just because you don’t understand or know what they do and are ignorant doesn’t make it wasteful.
2023 US Defense Budget...
$850 billion to fight over the only planet capable of supporting our species...
Makes sense...
They’re diesel…
Yes
Should have brought deere's
😂 no
Is this where your carbon tax dollars are going?
There probably just using case because the green from John Deere it a little bit harder to see in the snow
I hope dont use it to destroy the inner city in antartica place were only they can go
Why are the comments so salty here? Lol
Probably cause people don't like the government forcing bullshit on them and then the government doing whatever they please, rules for thee not for me tends to make people a bit salty
But who owns antarctica?
Argentina, Australia, Chile, France, New Zealand, Norway, and the United Kingdom claims part of Antarctica, but officially no country can own it.
@OP It's a "neutral" whateversomething now, which is just pretend because in reality they got staked out areas but think of it like a campground. You got your campsite until you move. If you really want to bake your noodle, tho, look up pre-1945 maps. :)
The reason for the change is the globalists run all these countries so they don't see a need to have conflicts and wars in an area with no people to manipulate.
Modern wars are not about resources and land anymore, they about population control and wealth transfer.
@@_Boni_ And America and Russian sort of have a form of a "I get all of it" coupon that they avoid using for various conflict related reasons
Quadtrac
No pollution garbage eh. Tell the truth
Out of Antartica !
It's case new Holland. CNH , but also CIH. It's funny.
Case and new Holland merged a few years ago.
I know just cause a friend of mine invented something used on their combines that are sold as case IH combines but the award came from case new Holland CNH. Confusing isn't it
Actually Case did not merge with New Holland. Case went out of the Agricultural business years ago. Tenneco bought IH and Case Ag. way back in the 1980s and merged them. Fiat bought the company after that and bought NH and merged them in there too. Like you said - Confusing to say the least.
It was more than a few years ago, it was 23 years ago to be specific. It is confusing, so I think a better explanation is needed to understand it...
Tenneco spun off the Case and CaseIH lines into a new independent company called "Case Corp" in 1994. That company only remained independent for five years, as Fiat acquired it in 1999 and merged it with New Holland, which they had bought from Ford in 1991, forming the new subsidiary "CNH Global". Although the letters obviously come from Case and New Holland, the term "Case New Holland" has never been officially used; it is just "CNH".
Next in 2011, parent Fiat SpA spun off Iveco and FPT Industrial (from Fiat Powertrain Technologies) into a new independent company called Fiat Industrial. Two years later in 2013, CNH Global was also removed from Fiat SpA and merged into Fiat Industrial, which then changed its name to CNH Industrial.
That is how it stands today in 2022: CaseIH, Case, New Holland, and Steyr are the brands of CNH Industrial, an independent publicly traded company headquartered in the UK, but traded on the New York Stock Exchange and an Italian stock exchange. Although CNH is corporately no longer part of Fiat, (just to add one more piece of confusion) the Agnelli family who owns most of the stock of Fiat also owns most of the stock of CNH Industrial, so they are still unofficially "related" in that way.
Take a look at the current CNH Industrial logo. To make the I for "Industrial", the black letter H has a red square dot over it, reminiscent of the logo IH used from 1946 to 1985, clearly and rightly a tribute to International Harvester.
@@mattstarzec4143 Case never went out of the agricultural business, they always built and sold farm tractors. All other Case agriculture equipment besides tractors was ended by parent Tenneco in 1972, the same year Tenneco bought David Brown tractors and merged them into Case, which it had acquired five years earlier.
The JI Case Company ceased to be independent way back in 1964, when it was purchased by the Kern County Land Company of California.
Tenneco bought Case (the entire company including construction and lawn & garden, not just ag equipment) well before the 1980's, buying all of Kern County Land Co three years later in 1967. Tenneco later bought just the agricultural assets of International Harvester (not the entire company) in November 1984, then finally exited the farm equipment business in 1994, as per my previous reply.
Ain’t it great! I see those green John Deere’s can’t handle a little cool weather!!! Go Red!
Never wouild ,never could!
Gosh, my neighbor has been by all week in his JD, hauling bales for his cattle...
-25 for the past 3 days, and it looks to be running just fine...
Whoops!
@@codymoe4986 that’s not Antartica…
new 535's to push snow, talk about overkill. i can grantee no maintenance worker is sitting that cab long enough to burn all that fuel in those expanded tanks. they run 12+ hours doing real field work with stock tanks. all that said i can't argue with their taste.
The expanded tanks are probably for the multi day journey between bases, after all 12+ hours of field work may not take a full tank, but 48+ of pulling 6 sleds probably will. Plus in antarctica, or anywhere remote, better to have too much fuel than not enough
Someone needs to remind case that it's time to update the appearance of their new products
They look good to me. Don’t see an issue with appearance
Maybe they should paint them green for a season as not to offend the John Deere guys!??🤷🏼♂️🤷🏼♂️😜
@@cyrusumberger5285😂😂😂
It’s a dated look that is still worlds better than JD. Since we’re throwing out opinions I’ll add mine.
@@cyrusumberger5285 if you paint them green they automaticly have to go back to the dealer every 59 minutes worth of use to drain your wallet!
Don't you call those beautiful red machines "Case" tractors. They are CaseIH tractors! Emphasis on the IH, that's where the brand really came from, and why they are red. Leaving out the "IH" when you speak the brand's name is blasphemy.
Actually, these models are part of Steiger technology and lineage, not International Harvester.
Case IH bought Steiger in 1986 and got the heavy tractor technology.
@@stevangucu522 As my comment says, the entire BRAND really came from IH, not those specific tractors in the video. But about that...
Steiger built IH articulated 4WDs since the 4366 beginning in 1973. So although the acquisition of Steiger didn't occur until after the Case-IH "merger", the relationship and experience with Steiger was from International Harvester too!
@@TonyM132 IH AND Case are footnotes, it's all FIAT.
@@stevangucu522 No ,you're wrong.IH bought a 3rd stake in Steiger back in the 70's and the relationship passed on to Case-IH in the 80's with Case-IH aquiring Steiger.
@chipps1066 Even if IH bought 1/3rd of Steiger, it continued its own line of tractors until the full merger. Also, IH wasn't the only company Steiger gave articulated technology, it went to numerous small companies and big companies, even in East Bloc like Hungarian Raba-Steiger.
why do they need the big frame quadtracks lol u dont need that much power for snow
Call them and tell them that then, maybe they'll promote you to head of their resource and equipment division. Or, maybe they've already considered other options and your intellectually impaired brain can't fathom that other people probably have a greater understanding of this than you.
When the government funds you a million per tractor you don’t say no thanks I just need 300K
@Daniel Heise That's not how it goes down, stop eating crayons.
@@rorschacht8478 so the government doesn’t provide funding? Simply stating someone is wrong doesn’t prove much tell me how I’m wrong
I can't speak for the Australians, and that's who these new tractors in the video are for. The US program however needs them for their weight, mostly. Occasionally, one of them will be taken out on the South Pole Traverse as well, and that size tractor is nice to have in comparison to the standard MT865C that is used for the traverse. The US's Case Quadtracs are nearly all tired out though, and they took delivery of two new MTS quads early this year.
I want one!
Yes way to go caseiH your an awesome company and build great equipment. And as far as you guys complaining about the dpf you need to take that up our government and the old guy in the white house they sent the rules the equipment manufacturers weather it's agriculture or commercial have to work in the guidelines that they sre given. Now as far as Antarctica maybe they have different laws regarding emissions over there I just think it great that caseih has been building tractors for them for 20 years awsome.
I wonder how much this cost us, the United States taxpayer? Half a million dollar machines or more, for what? WHAT A WASTE OF MONEY!!!!
Video said almost 1 million dollars each tractor after the Antarctica modifications had been completed.
... they are required for operations in antartica. of all things to get upset about in terms of tax money poorly spent, thats probably the dumbest hill top die on.
@@katraapplesauce1203 For popsicle farming?
@Dusin Bonnema If you're so intellectually impaired that you must oppose anything and everything that your welfare "tax dollars" gets spent on, it's probably a great idea to just stfu.
@@katraapplesauce1203 no, it’s okay to voice frustration about another example among thousands at all government levels of “poorly spent” taxpayer dollars. “research” is a common carte blanche