Why SCARY STORIES Is NOT A Good Horror Movie
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 вер 2024
- Patreon ► / ryanhollinger
Twitter ► / ryanhollinger
Instagram ► / horrorhollinger
Email ► screensmart@outlook.com
ABOUT THE SHOW:
This show celebrates Ryan's love for film, games, art and entertainment through personal retrospective analysis that aims to explore what made them so good.
MUSIC:
Ghost Chase Thriller by Sir Cubworth
Dance of the U-boat by Aakash Gandhi
When Gods Pontificate by Dan Bodan
Roots of Legend by Density & Time
Waltz To De.ath by Sir Cubworth
Magical Dirt by Sir Cubworth
Addicted by VYEN
Lullaby by Yung Logos
*What is the Best story for the book series or film?*
If you like the video, make sure to hit SUBSCRIBE for more horror content!
Day 7 of requesting don't look now
Ryan love the content! Please talk about the watcher in the woods!!!
To be honest Harold affected me so damn much because of the ending
The movie is a horror movie for 12 year olds, and I am fine with that.
Now, if they could only make horror movies for adults......
Fuck off this film was great
I honestly thought it could be a Netflix limited series with every episode being a different story with maybe the same generic characters solving the last mystery in the final episode
So...scooby doo?
I just commented the same thing, I should have read first! I agree though. This is what I said when I left the theatre.
Yes!
Jam Bismuth kinda like Scooby Doo just actually scary so it has enough time to develop each story
yes, totally agree
Dude, Pan’s Labyrinth was NEVER marketed as an “edgy” children’s movie- the ratings and the actual content in the movie does never allude to it being for children, in Sweden it got an r-rating which is what it is.
Yep, rated R in the US too. A child protagonist does not a child's story make.
In fairness I think Pan's Labyrinth is one of those films that work on multiple levels, IE a child might still enjoy some elements of it while the serious political stuff mostly flies over their heads. I wouldn't call it a children's film at all but it's film that contains enough fantastical elements to be interesting to a kid even if they don't quite get it. It's not like making a child sit through Schindler's list or something.
Actually in some places it was marketed as a kids film, like in Australia.
@@Chris-ci8vs kind of bizarre
@@AliRadicali I'd like to refer you to the scene where the commander smashes a man's face with a bottle in front of his father before shooting them both. Like I'm honestly baffled if you think that children wouldn't "quite get it", forget them enjoying the movie, it would scar them for life...
"Scary Stories To Tell In The Dark" is very much a gateway film. Wouldn't recommend it to horror veterans, but would definitely recommend it to someone that's dipping their toes in horror that'll lead them down deeper cuts.
Fear Shorts I think it’s a good nostalgia turn off ur brain movie
Fear Shorts I highly recommend you check out the tie in book called “The Haunted Book of Sarah Bellows.” It’s told in the form of the stories that were supposed to be written in the journal from the movie. It also includes concept art and it actually makes the film scarier. Like with the illustrations for the original trilogy, they don’t depict what _actually_ happens in the film, but they make it much more nightmarish. Like with Harold, after the kid was turned into a scarecrow and the main characters looked at him, out of their view was the boy’s skin on the roof of the house. With the other stories, the zombie and The Pale Lady transmogrify into horrific versions of themselves before killing the kids and The Jangly Man contorts as if it came from Silent Hill or The Thing (the John Carpenter one, not the ghost story from the first book).
@@troin3925 Thanx for the recommendation, I'll definitely check it out! Had not heard of it before you mentioned it.
@Jackie Nova, the wonderful thing about horror is that the genre is elastic enough to be inclusive of all types of horror-related content, hardcore or soft-serve (so to speak).
@@fearshorts8276 You're welcome.
"Technically, none of the kids die."
One got stabbed with a pitchfork.
shhh, these youtube videos aren't a discussion its basically "i said so, bye"
@@Megelos I mean, people make mistakes. In a movie this dull, it's possible to forget details.
@@justinkroboth360 The death scenes were the only memorable things, if you forget about those you might as well not post a video about it because clearly it wasn't engaging enough for that.
He was stabbed with a pitchfork but there was only straw so was he really killed, also I'm pretty sure he was referencing the main characters as opposed to antagonist
@@keonbush6135 I'm fairly certain if your innards have been replaced with straw, that means you're dead.
Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark is like early creepypastas: scary as a child, but not solid enough to survive a change in medium or be scary as an adult.
I can still remember a small story I heard on the radio when I was little that is still scary to me thats similar to these urban legends.
Also the popular Creepypastas might not scare me that much anymore (I love them I don't fear them LOL) but Creepsmcpasta still reads stories off the internet and some of them are really f*cking scary. Hell "Abandoned by Disney" still gets me!!!!!
@@cakey2097 That nostalgic setting that most kids won't care about though...
Didn't like this movie, but I think it was intentionally meant to be a "Kids first horror film"
Doogert McKoog witch makes No sense. I had this book when I was a kid, and that was in the late 80,s and 90’s. This should have been adapted for adults that grew up with the book. Not kids today
I havent seen it yet... but money is the bottom line these days... the wider the demographic, the more people go see it... make a mediocre movie and make a shit ton of money
It is definitely too scary for a kid.
@@Podcastforthewin I see what you did there
It feels like that's the case for most modern American horror movies.
No one went for the plot, everyone went to see the drawings animated.
I did. To be honest I wanted to see how the stories are incorporated, hoping to see a bait and switch where you think it was one story when it ends up another.
That's not an excuse for a shit movie
Still not a good movie
The scarecrow eating human eyeballs with a spoon is iconic.
@@DJ-vg1pr We get it you like James Wan can you get over yourself bro
I feel like it was trying to be more of a HALLOWEEN movie more than a horror movie. Like something the new generation can watch every Halloween. That's just me
How can it be a Halloween movie if it isn’t a horror movie? That seems like a prerequisite
@@Bhubnipz Well, Monster House isn’t exactly horror, but it’s still a movie that people watch during Halloween. It’s kind of like that.
@@lieutenantgodzilla do you know what horror is dude
@@Bhubnipz Hocus pocus, nightmare before Christmas, mad monster party, Addams family, plenty of Halloween movies aren’t horror movies.
Also, I made this same comment two months before you and got no likes. I hate you
Pan’s Labyrinth *IS* a film for adults, it received a literal R rating upon release. With excessive violence, death and explicit adult themes, yeah- an edgy kids film. JoJo Rabbit I can understand, it deals with heavy stuff but at least has a playful manner and don’t go too far.
All my relatives treated it as a Kids movie that you absolutely had to watch (I'm from México)
I don't know if he sees the fact that Ofelia's fantasy was intentionally left ambiguous, because it changes the entire perspective whether or not one believes her imagination was real.
I mean... jojo's mom...
Then how come my 7th grade Spanish teacher at my Christian school played it for my class?
@@theofficialvernetheturtley338 Cuz she dumb lol.
This movie felt more like an episode of Goosebumps, and I hated how they just set it up for a sequel instead of actually resolving anything.
Of all the places to find someone with a Fire Emblem pfp I didn’t expect it to be here
Honestly I think making it feel like Goosebumps was the point, because the Goosebumps movie did pretty well.
They should have made a series about it. Maybe with a framing device, like Tales From The Crypt? Two stories, each fifteen to thirty minutes. One is dark, the other is lighter. I always imagined this as a halfway point between children and adults. So we scare children but also make them feel safe.
Horror has to be the hardest genre to make a good movie in. This wasn't a surprise. And there are so few visionary's in the genre, Ari Aster being probably the best over the last half decade.
Robert Eggers too
@@FooshigiMLGlol The Witch was so good, I despise jump scares and overly cliche horror and it just hit that perfect eerie and dreadful tone. Still need to see The Lighthouse.
@@goatgod2009 the lighthouse is incredible but I wouldn't call it a horror film, although it has a few horror elements
Jordan Peele is doing a pretty good job too I would say.
I’d put Jennifer Kent there as well.
The thing with this movie is that it's counting on the nostalgia of kids who grew up in the 80s and 90s, but providing content that's directed at kids and teens of today who don't have that sort of nostalgia for the books, so it ends up not being for anyone. Having said that, I did enjoy it. I just didn't think it was particularly engrossing.
It was still popular for us born in the early 00’s as well. However, I do believe that the vibe of the series itself didn’t really fit with today’s cinema. If it was made in the same style as the IT mini-series and Goosebumps show, it could have been more intriguing.
Well said. I enjoyed the recreations of the artwork that I do have some legitimate nostalgia for. The toe zombie sticks out as I basically repressed that memory. Gave me a legitimate chill in a "Oh fun a childhood fear I forgot about" way.
But otherwise it was just alright. It does seem like a good horror movie for kids but, to my knowledge, younger children don't have a connection to these stories. Which is a shame really, I was sad to learn they fell out of popularity. I remember renting it from the school library and actually reading the thing was a badge of courage situation in like first grade for me.
read all of them despite being an early 2000's kid, so I think teens today could find nostalgic merit in them too. They were always in the teacher's classroom library
I found the movie quite good, and I wasn’t lured in by nostalgia though I was familiar with the book. I hardly even remember the stories.
It doesn’t really need to get kids who are nostalgic for the books tho? Kids just like scary stuff...
I work at a theater and sold tickets to a mom and her 11 year old daughter. The mother said that she was taking her daughter to her first horror movie and I thought that this movie was perfect for that
So wholesome
As someone who’s never read the books, not even as a child: I enjoyed it! It’s not scary, but the effects and performances by the young cast are stellar, and there’s some freaky imagery at play here. I rarely disagree with your videos, but, here we are! Lol. You can’t expect a teen horror movie based on a young adult series of books to be revolutionary for the genre. Also, you seem to have misunderstood the direction Guillermo Del Toro was going with Pan’s Labyrinth...
I fully agreed with everything you said!
I never read the books either so went in with a clean slate too! I didn't really connect much with the storyline honestly (I can't really remember most of the main plot) but some of the horror sequences stuck with me so much. I loved the pale lady segment for the visuals, and felt genuinely terrified through much of the build up of the toe lady (I feel like the only person who was more scared by her than any other monster), and the scarecrow was an awesome and really creative first monster in my opinion. Interesting that our perspectives are more positive than those of the people who read the books
Cringe
That seems to be the demographic they were aiming at. I'm 27 and I read this book when I was 8 years old, whereas my sister who is 22 did not and has never heard of it. Very odd choice, but I guess the nostalgia was just for promotional sake.
X1,000,000
Scary Stories has the weirdest nostalgia cult this side of Riverdale.
The artwork creeped me out as a kid, but I can't for the life of me remember any of the stories. Riverdale is a fine dumb twist of Archie with an obvious hard on for shows like Twin Peaks.
Do people actually like Riverdale? Or do they just watch it for the redhead girl?
@@OrbitZombie yeah i remember the picture with that ghost lady obsessed with those quarters or whatever. That gave me nightmares as a kid😅
@@Hickspy_ I'll admit to liking it because it makes no real effort to be serious. It's hipster Twin Peaks, and it's occasionally quite amusing.
Riverdale? You mean the edgelord's version of Archie comics. It wasn't lighthearted enough. I can't believe they already ignored the source material.
I loved the movie
but if the movie was R Rated this would have been much scarier considering the scary stories books were very very descriptive of decaying bodies and characters deaths
That doesn't work for marketing to a wider audience and aimed at teens and younger for who the book was originally written for. Go watch tales from the crypt
@@nightmaresand808s your telling me the scary stories book was intended for kids the same book where one of the story about a man falling to his death and getting crushed causing him to be dismembered
@@Legendary-Nitro um...yes. That is exactly what they are saying. When is the last time you've read one of those stories? They're so simplistically written and they're made for children. Period. That's why they work when we're younger and not so much when we're older.
The more I think about it the scary story collection must be the reason why im so desensitized towards gore and horror
Legendary | NitroRetribution The series is geared for 8-12 year olds, hence why it is found in the children’s section of bookstores.
The only story from the series I remember was "The Viper", the one where the twist is it's just a window washer with a speech impediment.
So that one is comedy,
with a bit, of horror.
Technically an accent, not speech impediment. But yes, that was one of the most memorable stories for me, too. "I'm the Viper. I've come to vash your vindows."
Weirdly, that was the one that freaked me out the most.
I remember one involving an old bedridden man in a nursing home and another in the bed by the window.
The one by the window always talks about the beautiful things he can see outside, so the other old man got jealous and killed him just to take his spot and look out the window.
He sees nothing but a brick wall.
@@pjdougherty6442 Yeah it was dark.
"technically none of the kids die"
but you JUST went over one of them turning into straw
Yeah but he was alive straw
He's fiiiineeee
The guy really doesn’t know shit about horror in general and his insight is ridiculous. This video is awful.
@@jamescarter3196 make your own channel then
@@jamescarter3196 then you explain it
I think for once you might be a little TOO cynical with this take. When I saw it in theaters, my initial reaction was feeling like a kid again. Getting the same feelings I got watching Truth or Scare, Scooby Doo on Zombie Island, The Mummy, Monster House, etc. A mixture of first horror with whimsy. Mostly it reminded me of a sleepover I had when I was 12ish where my three friends and I watched The Ring and One Missed Call back to back. I can absolutely see tweens in the future dare each other to watch this movie in the dark and would consider it a good "Kid's First Horror" if you will. P.s. I did think the ending with the dude re-enlisting was weird, especially since Del Toro is very much anti-war.
Being fair to the ending, I got the sense it was supposed to play up that he wasn't given much choice since he'd been caught draft dodging.
It seems disappointing that the movie has the draft dodger re-enlisting,even though there were good reasons not to go to Vietnam.l guess the producers felt a conservative message was somehow more uplifting.
How tf are you guys thinking the draft dodger „re-enlists“? It’s a DRAFT. No one gives a F whether you want to go. The police literally drag his ass there.
I highly recommend you check out the tie in book called “The Haunted Book of Sarah Bellows.” It’s told in the form of the stories that were supposed to be written in the journal from the movie. It also includes concept art and it actually makes the film scarier. Like with the illustrations for the original trilogy, they don’t depict what _actually_ happens in the film, but they make it much more nightmarish. Like with Harold, after the kid was turned into a scarecrow and the main characters looked at him, out of their view was the boy’s skin on the roof of the house. With the other stories, the zombie and The Pale Lady transmogrify into horrific versions of themselves before killing the kids and The Jangly Man contorts as if it came from Silent Hill or The Thing (the John Carpenter one, not the ghost story from the first book).
Imo it was pretty fun. It didn’t make me go WOW but it was a fun movie to watch.
Timotheetus G I think he’s not making the point that it’s all around an awful movie, just that it’s not the masterpiece of horror that many of its fans are claiming it is.
I do agree though, it was fun to see my childhood nightmares come to “life”.
Timotheetus G I highly recommend you check out the tie in book called “The Haunted Book of Sarah Bellows.” It’s told in the form of the stories that were supposed to be written in the journal from the movie. It also includes concept art and it actually makes the film scarier. Like with the illustrations for the original trilogy, they don’t depict what _actually_ happens in the film, but they make it much more nightmarish. Like with Harold, after the kid was turned into a scarecrow and the main characters looked at him, out of their view was the boy’s skin on the roof of the house. With the other stories, the zombie and The Pale Lady transmogrify into horrific versions of themselves before killing the kids and The Jangly Man contorts as if it came from Silent Hill or The Thing (the John Carpenter one, not the ghost story from the first book).
Same, if I was 10 years old this would've been a great introduction to horror.
@@Jill4ChrisRedfeild I've seen some parents take their kids to go watch the IT remakes i think kids these days are used to seeing worse horror.
I enjoyed it for what it was. I saw it with my girlfriend and we had fun with it. Fun scares, definitely geared more towards a younger audience, but again fun for what it is. Nothing innovative, but a good time
There was this show here in Australia called “R.L Stines The haunting hour” it freaked me out when it was on the telly and an episode about an evil school mascot called “Big yellow” still terrifies me to this day more than anything else I’ve seen. Seeing the trailer for this movie reminded me about that big yellow bastard
It did also play in America, that episode and monster still scares me to this day, what I found amazing about the show what how many times the main characters were implied to have died, including the kid in Mascot.
Y’all cringe 😬 none of that is scary
Aj King mate i was like 13-14 and barely ever watched horror movies, that sort of thing freaked me the fuck out
That show was pretty intense for a kid’s show
I used to watch that when I was like, 9-10, and it gave me nightmares and a fear of dolls from that one episode with the life sized doll.
Finally!! I thought i was going crazy when everyone started praising it like a masterpiece. Good to know I wasn't alone
That's how i felt when people were praising Silent Hill 2 and saying how scary it was.
Same. Overrated
When I saw the trailer it made me remember being in third grade being unable to sleep because of the scarecrow story. When it came out I was disappointed about the lack of skin being left to dry in the sun, which was the the specific line my dad taunted me with.
I think you're forgetting the demographic of tween and teens in this regard. Not to mention, the film being an American Hollywood film and receiving a PG-13 rating in America should be a good indication of it's target demographic. The film being rating too high in your country isn't so much a failure on the films part to decide it's own audience, but rather a failing on your countries review system to accurately gauge a films contents. As far as the comments about Del Toro's other works go, I disagree strongly with that too. The point of films like Pan's Labyrinth are the themes and ideas within, not necessarily the scares in them. Regardless of how it was marketed, I don't think anyone would argue that Pan's Labyrinth was supposed to be a horror film or even particularly scary, just simply off-putting at times and soaked in a dark atmosphere. He isn't compensating scares with themes, he's simply exploring themes in his own way which modern audiences are so accustomed to being vehicles for scares. The Pale Man in Pan's Labyrinth isn't a jolt of skin-crawling horror, it's a moment of danger for our protagonist on her journey. Simply because it is also kind of creepy doesn't mean Del Toro is failing us as an audience by not fully committing to the potential horror of the scene.
This
I agree with this statement, and I do think that Scary Stories is a rare gem in modern cinema as a PG-13 horror movie. But I think, as an adaption of the short story collection, that it should’ve aimed for a R rating because adults are the ones who read the short stories as children. By no means a bad film though
Original Title: No, SCARY STORIES Is Not A Good Horror Movie
Lol I saw that
@@ShadowHumor me too.
Imagine if David Lynch adapted these scary stories. That would be supernaturally nightmarish!!
IAmNoOne but they probably wouldn’t make much sense.
Wario Wuzo The illustrations either make no sense out of context anyway, or didn’t have context to begin with (the latter with Oh Susanna).
Wario Wuzo doesn’t matter. Lynch just needs to create a surreal, unnerving, disturbing atmosphere and the rest is history lol
Inland Empire is plenty nightmarish.
Yeah but he'd cope out an actual story because he is too much of a pussy to add real endings
The pale lady picture was the most horifying thing I've ever seen and it still makes me lose some sleep sometimes.
The book did scare the shit out of me, the illustrations added to it. It sounds so dumb but I would hide the book just to feel safe when I was younger.
same 😂. I still have it and it's hidden in the corner of my bookshelf somewhere 🗣
Problem is that it's not rated R. It has setups for super disturbing imagery, but it's watered down because the studio wanted the kiddie audience. Despite fans of the book being adults by now.
The movie was alright, but let’s be real here: Trick ‘R Treat > Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark.
The few times I've been asked about my opinion on Scary Stories, I usually bring up Trick R Treat as the comparison, as it did Scary Stories better than the movie actually called "Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark". I think it also had roughly the same number of stories too.
Trick 'r Treat. 100%
Well obviously, but that is a silly comparison.
Trick R' Treat is one of the best horror movies ever, not even a fair comparison lmao
Apples to oranges, Trick 'R Treat is more adult horror whle SSTD is more of an introduction horror to younger audiences
The books are effing fantastic though, even though they're mostly compilations of folklore (aka urban legends).
Got some pretty bad nightmares. I remember one about a guy in 19th Century America who refuses to sleep outdoors when there's a barn with a stove, but the older hands said not to do that. Well, he does that and gets into a fight with a crazy not-quite-human guy and in the morning the guys just drive off without their friend, like they just knew it was gonna happen.
EFFED ME UP REAL BAD AS A KID.
"Effed"...
Geoff F. I highly recommend you check out the tie in book called “The Haunted Book of Sarah Bellows.” It’s told in the form of the stories that were supposed to be written in the journal from the movie. It also includes concept art and it actually makes the film scarier. Like with the illustrations for the original trilogy, they don’t depict what _actually_ happens in the film, but they make it much more nightmarish. Like with Harold, after the kid was turned into a scarecrow and the main characters looked at him, out of their view was the boy’s skin on the roof of the house. With the other stories, the zombie and The Pale Lady transmogrify into horrific versions of themselves before killing the kids and The Jangly Man contorts as if it came from Silent Hill or The Thing (the John Carpenter one, not the ghost story from the first book).
I also thought the movie was pretty meh. But that "Season of the Witch" Lana Del Rey cover was fucking great.
The books scary stories to tell in the dark is the child's version of Junji Ito's works.
john cornwell that name sounded familiar so I looked it up. I saw he created The Enigma of Amigara Fault. I first had seen the story years ago, but didn’t really know who the author was. I’ll have to check out his other works. Any recommendations?
@@dylan351321
Spiral, The city with no roads.
@@dylan351321 hanging balloons
That shit is trash
@@dylan351321 tonnes, hes done a lot of horror anthology managa and Enigma is just a small story in his huge collection. His most famous ones are Uzumaki (spiral), Tomie and Gyo, but he's also done his own interpretation of Frankenstein and has a few books of short horror collections called Shiver, Fragments of Horror, and smashed.
He doesn't just do horror though! He does comedy horror, bittersweet/love stories but with a unique twist. Theyre all excellent and different :)n
Scary Stories was one of my favorite book series as a kid. Namely, the notes and bibliography set me down a path of interest in folklore, anthropology, and research. The notes in the back that went through the history of the tales made me fall in deeper love.
I still plan on eventually watching this despite how disappointed I will be. What’s worse, is there was an excellent story here. All real folklore summed up in an ancient book with descriptions of its origins leaving multiple possibilities
I loved the Scary Stories To Tell In The Dark books when I was a kid. I also love Del Toro. I wanted this to be a good movie SO badly. Ah well.
John Caparso del toro didn’t direct this movie
@@edienandy It was his idea not to turn it into an anthology though. It should have been imo. It should have also been rated R. Del Toro is losing it. I hope he ups his game.
@@jimsuniverse4954 I don't think he's really "losing" anything, but he took a different approach with it is all; much different then his previous movies which were about war and of course it'll be more terrifying. I just think Ryan is looking a little too deep, I respect his opinion of course but there's no harm in liking this movie.
Why do you sound like your mic is inside of a box during the segments when you're in front of the camera?
Dick in a box?
Maybe he got kind of heavy on noise removal when he edited the audio. The audio can have a muffled quality kind of like that when you do that.
I feel like it could’ve been adapted better as an animated film. Really lean into the surrealism of the illustrations and just bring them to life. Or if they really wanted to go live action, they could’ve shot in black and white. I really like how “alive” the lady monster looks, but going for a Twilight Zone-type feel would’ve made the monsters seem more real to the world.
I love the original books. I checked them out from the library every time I could, and I bought the 3-in-1 anthology when I had the chance. I was genuinely afraid to even touch the book-the bride’s face looked like it was ready to bite my fingers. But even though the stories themselves are tried and true urban legends that are intentionally basic and vague, I loved it because of the way it discussed horror.
It was the first book I remember actually paying attention to the foreword and end notes. The mental image of this man, a writer, traveling the countryside in search of ghost stories and urban legends and dissecting them to understand exactly what in the world it is that scares us was absolutely captivating. It was the first time I started to think of horror as a true art form.
And maybe that could’ve been a more compelling use of the Scary Stories imagery and title. A tale about a writer venturing off into the countryside and collecting ghost stories, only to realize that there’s a lot more to these tales than just imagination.
I think it should be in stop motion like coreline
I think the argument when it comes to "target audience" is always a double edged sword. Sure you can have a critical analysis with the meta context of who it's allegedly supposed to be for. But at the end of the day, there are many people who want this bridge between these constructs of general audience age groups and such.
They simply enjoy the content itself because of, in spite of, or even regardlessly of these things.
Sometimes a story is a story and an individual taste or budding new tastes and etc are the target. And yes, there is a legitimate argument in someone with studio experience and a studio themselves having to more or less play the game of these things.
But, I think there's something to be said about praising one content that defies these while viewing it as a criticism/bad thing in content we don't like as much.
I do enjoy your videos a lot. Sorry for this long paragraph. Haha. In fact this paragraph is because I enjoy this open letter you seem to radiate with genuine discussion of media instead of flat, monotone perception.
edit: 1 I agree with your opinion on how the resolution seems prowar-ish intentional or not
2 I think we need some more horror for parents to enjoy with their kids or for less intense fans to enjoy. (And just more actual family films that aren't just kids movies)
me: adores Ryan’s youtube videos
also me: adores Scary Stories
(this will be a fun video to watch hehehhe)
Same here lol
Yup yup yup *sits with popcorn in hand*
If there were more scares like the red room monster, it would've been great for me.
I just rewatched Rec 2. you should do a video on the REC movie series. the first two movies were so god damn brilliant and definitely need talking about!
I haven't seen REC 2, but I saw and absolutely adored REC! It's one of my top favorite movies. Thanks for the recommendation, I'll check out the sequel for sure!
It was a nostalgia trip for me solely. I grew up with the books being provided at book fairs and public libraries in my area. A lot of kids I know growing up have one specific drawing or story that stuck with them
if it makes you feel better, those books did traumatise me as a child. i was very very curious as well as very anxious/easily scared with an overactive imagination. i saw the covers and, despite knowing i’d be scared later, read them. i couldn’t sleep for weeks afterwards
I read the books when I was a kid, so I was pretty excited about it! I was also super excited about the monster design, because I thought it would be done by Guillermo del Toro. Unfortunately he confirmed he had an entirely different vision than his co - writers and they went with their ideas instead, however.
The real confusing thing about Del Toro and his writing stems from the fact that he seems to be an artist who creates his art more for himself than for his audience. Which is something I really admire as a fellow writer; I wish I could do the same! He enjoys his own works so much that he doesn't really seem to give it much thought who else will like it, because HE loves it and assumes that that makes it good. (I personally love a lot of his work, btw, but mostly because of his creature design.)
He is a director that I wish wasnt so strangled by others in some cases. When he has the reigns it's always great.
@@TheAbigailDee Exactly! His stories always sound off the wall and strange in concept (and most of them ARE) but they tend to work REALLY WELL when they are worked out following his vision.
This movie wasnt good. The Grudge remake was worse tho
DO NOT SPEAK OF THE ABOMINATION!!!!
Both pretty damn boring. But I liked the Fall setting in Scary Stories.
The remake was actually quite good. The remake of the remake, on the other hand, you can just tell it's terrible from the trailer alone.
@@HA-ot6uf i knew it was gonna be bad when i heard how poorly executed the classic sound was done
Which Grudge remake?
for the record, the water was poisoned by mercury because of pollution from the family's mill and they wanted to cover up the scandal. They didn't just poison the water "just cuz"
I'm with you!!
'Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark', as a film, should have been done as a series of anthology stories that may become together at the end kind of like the film 'Trick-or-Treat'...
THAT was anthology done terrifying well!! 👻😱
I love well done practical effects and I love anthology stories and I love horror but this film didn't really make good use of all of those things at the same time.
"Nothing ever comes anywhere close" Exactly how I felt. The scarecrow part made me think we were gonna get a real disturbing, expectation subverting film. Then it just got more and more boring.
That’s why you don’t start out with the best one
it took you 5 years to have a bad take i'm impressed
some youtubers dole out bad takes on a bi-weekly basis
I really enjoyed the movie. It didn't take itself too seriously and is a good film for horror beginners. I think you might be reading too much into it
Tara it’s a good intro into the horror genre for children
Really? I thought it took itself too seriously, hence why it was such a chore to get through.
Tara I highly recommend you check out the tie in book called “The Haunted Book of Sarah Bellows.” It’s told in the form of the stories that were supposed to be written in the journal from the movie. It also includes concept art and it actually makes the film scarier. Like with the illustrations for the original trilogy, they don’t depict what _actually_ happens in the film, but they make it much more nightmarish. Like with Harold, after the kid was turned into a scarecrow and the main characters looked at him, out of their view was the boy’s skin on the roof of the house. With the other stories, the zombie and The Pale Lady transmogrify into horrific versions of themselves before killing the kids and The Jangly Man contorts as if it came from Silent Hill or The Thing (the John Carpenter one, not the ghost story from the first book).
I agree. It was a fun little horror romp.
In the books, people (including children) were butchered and eaten, graves were robbed, corpses mutilated, it taught kids to sing about the dead, while the dead constantly tormented people to death, and evil was often the victor in the end. Fans of the book expected the movie to have the courage to do the same. Especially given the producers, writers, and director who worked on it, since they all have R rated films in their filmographies.
I haven't seen it yet but that is sad because this is the guy who made Troll Hunter and The Autopsy of Jane Doe which were both fantastic. I am surprised he made a bad film tbh
Happy to hear I am not alone. So much hype about this film might have set me up for a letdown. One of the stories didn't even have any resolution or explanation. It simply ended and the next tale started.
I’ve never read the books but I still enjoyed the movie
I actually read the book because I only came here from that Ghost Song. I enjoyed it except I haven't seen the movie yet.
Same here. I remember them floating around the house. I was too afraid of the covers to try to read them.
@@jefferyjones8399 I'd be afraid to read any floating book, let alone one's with those covers!
I enjoyed the experience of seeing the movie. I'm what you'd call easily frightened so when I went to the theater and saw I was going to watch this movie alone because no one else was there I was already scared. Watching a horror movie by myself was definitely scary
Deep Ryan might make me happy with his examination of work...but angry Ryan is most entertaining Ryan
I remember all my classmates being psyched about this book, and it was always checked out at the library. This was around 2003 or so.
I'd love if it had been made some kind of anthropology or series in general.
ssj panda I agree, like Goosebumps
Did you mean anthology? Anthropology is a study of human cultures and societies and their development.
Anthology is a collection of stories in writing or in film.
Okay at best. I really like how they incorporated The Hearse Song though.
I usually agree with you fam but Nah
This movie wasn’t perfect but it’s great as a Halloween movie and just something to chill with if you don’t wanna be overly scared. It’s a fun movie.
I grew up with the awesome books with Stephen Gammell's art.
The movie made me sad.
Also screw you Ryan I hyped those books to kingdom come among my circle of friends :))
... I had fewer friends after.
I didnt realize this was a thing but what i remember of it as a kid and teenager is that it was more campy than scary. And its weird how ya described that it doesnt wanna pick a road.
This book had a special place in my heart when I was growing up, it basically lived in my backpack through elementary, I loved the stories and even tried to adapt a few of them, but like others I’m sure I was always scanning through the book looking at the illustrations as well.
It didn’t really do anything for me when the movie was announced though as I figured it would just be another cash grab-jump cut horror film.
11:02 Wow, spelling errors, in MY UA-cam video? What is this platform comiing to...
Rare to see a more negative review on this channel, I like it though, would love to see what else you hate
When I went to go see this movie in theaters, I was actually really entertained, not just with what was going on in with the movie but also with the fact that several people in the audience actually were making commentary throughout it. I think everyone knew it was just gonna be some cheesy stuff but honestly, it was surprisingly a lot of fun. Not to mention it's not dragged down by its fan base, unlike say joker, that just inspired a bunch of edgy shitheads. It was really one of the best times I had at the movies.
I sincerely hope theres a sequel ^.^
This movie has goosebumps and are you afraid of the dark vibes
Renamon 565 No it doesn’t. Are You Afraid of the Dark is far more narratively driven. Goosebumps couldn’t even hope to be as good as the show either.
For the record, the original "Scary Stories" book *did* scar my childhood. It was and still remains at least one of the most iconic representations of horror artwork of all time, in my mind. The stories themselves... not so much.
As a kid, I couldn't walk around my house in the dark for fear of The Bride. That picture jumps out at you when you turn the page, there's no getting away from it. As an adult, I didn't even want to watch that "toe" scene. I KNEW that image was coming.
@@madisonstoner7405 yeah neither could i
The cinematography and directing by André Øvredal really elevates this film and makes each creature section feel unique. I just appreciate how it feels like an old-school horror movie, even if it is playing on my nostalgia for the book in which I would bring to school to scare my classmates lol
Scary stories doesn’t even properly use any of the source material
Agree
Yup. It should have just been a short episodic series of the actual stories
@@yaboy5692 would've worked far better as a mini series on something like Netflix
NinjaTyler exactly !!
@@yaboy5692 Del Toro said he didn't make it an anthology film or series because "They are always as bad as the worst story, never as good as the best story"
i just liked the movie because i thought it was a fun little flick. i liked all the practical effects and designs, but i didnt really pay attention to the story
The weeping angels moving on screen was something that would've had to happen eventually. Welshy put it way better in his retrospective, but the only real trick beyond *Statue looks sinister while unknowing character walks by* was *character is caught in a dead end, blocked by a statue, they struggle to stare at it until they inevitably blink or look away-JUMPSCARE!!!*. I love the angels, but without having them move on screen, the scares boil down to early 2010's horror tropes. Plus, we wouldn't have gotten that awesome visual of the Statue of Liberty being an angel.
My stepdad actually expected the bully turning into a scarecrow.
There were actually several rational and reasonably worded responses on both sides in the beginning tweet crawl.
Before this movie, the only story I remembered from the books was the Big Toe one. I think the only thing I like about the movie was the monster designs
Scary Stories is actually a perfect recreation of the Scary Stories to Tell In The Dark book series: Beautifully disturbing visual imagery attached to some of the most tired, lame, overused, often borderline-nonsensical, pointless, poorly-written nonsense ever committed to the English language.
Which, I mean, yeah, it was a book that grade schools sold to ten-year-olds, so of course they aren't going to have psychologically disturbing stories; they're going to have "Charlie ate a toe and a creepy zombie got him" style campfire stories.
It's also almost intentional--they used the exact same creative formula for the movie as they did the books: They took writers who had pretty much only worked on kids' movies (Lego movies, Croods, Hotel Transylvania), and backed their G-rated campfire horror with a director who was fresh off of an extremely widely-acclaimed, genuinely creepy and disturbing movie (The Autopsy of Jane Doe), and backed by another master of visual horror (Guillermo Del Torro).
I mean, it's kind of beautiful how true they kept to the books in that deeply flawed respect.
The movie was made for people who grew up with the book, to take their children to the movies to introduce them to the book. So while it may not have had gore in it and it carries a PG13 rating, bringing a younger child isn't the end of the world, it's no worse than the book series. It attempted to bring the tension, twists, and feeling of the book series to the screen without gore or getting bogged down in what people consider "adult". It succeed for the most part on that merit. And really, bemoaning the movie because it didn't take the "easy route" as an anthology isn't a bad thing. Pretty much all anthology movies are bad, while this isn't perfect, it created a blanket narrative that allows the film makers to introduce book stories to the movie, while also leaving it open for another movie where we can get more book stories continuing in the framework they set up. You are actually invested in the movie now so a sequel is welcome for more than just nostalgia of childhood tales.
The Window story from "More Scary Stories" did traumatize me. I still keep my bedroom windows covered.
The white wolf was always the scariest one out of the book for me , not sure why .
"Why show us as something as brutal as this?"
*Shows something Brutal but I'm walking outside so it's just a black screen*
Never grew up with the books, I love Guillermo's designs but yeah not the most horrifying experience I thought I'd get.
I mean, I can't speak for others, but those books were a HUGE deal when I was a kid. They were frequently missing from library shelves due to waiting lists and were among the most challenged books of the 90's. To say that nobody talked about them... I don't know. Maybe where you grew up, it was different.
The scarecrow story in the original book was the scary story that stuck with me the most.
Scarcrows were always creepy to me so the thought of one coming to life and literally skinning people is frightening.
THANK YOU! Glad I'm not the only one who thinks that way.
Likewise, I felt like I was the ONLY one I knew who felt this way about this flick.
You hit the nail on the head for me with "Who is this movie actually made for?" It's what stuck out to me the most after seeing it the first time, for pretty much all the reasons you named and then some. Watching it, I had no idea whether to show it the grace I frequently (perhaps a touch erroneously) show horror targeted to younger teens or to treat it on the same level as an adult horror film trying to be ambitious. The Nixon thing was a particular confusing thorn poking out of the narrative for me, because nothing really built up any context for me to place its significance to the story, even thematically, because so little was really reinforced as having anything to do with it. When the characters escape the Jangly Man the first time, and flee from the police station, there's that closeup of the television declaring Nixon's win as a dramatic cap to the scene, and my reaction was a frustrated, "And? Why is this here? To remind us it's the 60s?" The drama of the closeup didn't feel like it made any sense. Then that FUCKING ENDING where the dude goes to war anyways. I saw this with my usual theater buddy who has taught a few film analysis classes, and we both didn't know what to make of it. "The war is bad and kids are dying and Nixon's a shit, but also don't run away from your fears and dodge the draft for this notoriously controversial war." I don't know how much of that was Del Toro idea, or if the script swerved hard from its original gist to avoid some sort of political accusation? I love Guillermo, but I do agree that he gets a little thematically and moralistically ambitious with his films and also their political backdrops, which has mostly worked in the past (Devil's Backbone, Pan's Labyrinth, etc.), but here can't genuinely commit or doesn't know what it really wants to do or say with it enough to make it feel more organic. I kind of wish they'd all just stuck to making a fun anthology monster flick with shamelessly indulgent set-ups rather than shoehorn a meaningful backdrop they can't expand upon anyways.
You underestimate how much the pictures added to the story. Both can't be separated and you also underestimate the love people had for the original source. The anniversary edition got panned for the toned down art they tried to put to it.
I can't imagine scenes in my head and those illustrations were so simple in detail it helped me have that experience by making the world so simple and empty even my brain could imagine it. I've never had that experience again that inky world filled with negative space that reached into the infinite fog is something I hold dear.
Its literally a horror movie for kids
I still talk about it often because it really has beautiful images and effects and everything was super nicely executed for something aimed at children.
I really enjoyed it personally
The books are for kids but im pretty sure the film was rated pg-13 so,, technically not for kids
@@Sunny-ek8sx 13 is a kid lmaoo
I am so happy about your existence and the ice cold, razor sharp analyses that come with it. Thank you for being avantgarde
I've worked at bookstores for years now; trust me, the hype for those books was always there, well before the film was announced
It’s targeted at families. Parents that loved the books could have faith in the movie for not being too violent and kids could use it as a jumping off point to get more into horror movies. It serves a very niche audience and isn’t flawless but it’s needed
The movie cabin in the woods was a great homage, because it was openly a fourth wall breaking homage
I love horror movies and I enjoyed watching this with my kids (who have seen much scarier things) it felt like a horror movie aimed at kids with Are you afraid of the dark? Vibe. Not scary but decent atmosphere and good enough to be an introduction into the genre.
I was so excited for this movie when I first heard it was coming out. I went to see it in theaters and I fell asleep because I was so bored. I'm glad I'm not the only one who didn't like it.
This book was extremely formative to me. I was a spooky kid who loved horror from a very young age and these books were the first time I found something genuinely scary that was made for _me_ , a child. And like, the stories themselves are fine, they're nothing spectacular, but imagining these stories with those pictures was terrifying. I was so excited for this movie, I love Del Torro's work, and I loved the promo pics. I hated this movie. They missed the point, they missed what was actually scary, and an anthology would have been so much better. Also, Me Tie Doughty Walker was genuinely scary. This kid gets dared to stay in this abandoned haunted house, that no one has survived. He starts hearing a call of "me tie doughty walker" in the wind, and it keeps getting closer. Then his dog starts *responding* growling out vague words, and cannot stop. the tension builds, and when it gets there a bloody decapitated old mans head comes down the chimney talking, and his dogs dies of fright. It's simple and harrowing, and they fucked it up. They tried to make it scary, and cool, and big, and missed the mark, because the simplicity made it scary.
Thanks for coming to my ted talk
I was genuinely terrified by the book as a child. Ran away screaming from my friends place as his mom finished one of them, can't remember which story it was. In a real horror story, I would have been killed by a ghost or something in the woods, but for some reason I wasn't scared of being in the middle of trees everywhere. A book and some words was more terrifying than a real life scenario where I could have had a horrible thing happen to me (woods have bears and such). I think that's kind of goofy.
Unless you're willing to go ALL in on visuals, a Scary Movies to Tell in The Dark movie would suck. A book famous for illustrations should have a movie famous for it's visuals.
I felt the exact same thing. Got all hyped because this was the movie which would shake up the whole horror genre... and after 15 minutes I looked at my friend with a face like: "Is this really how it will go? Just the same old same old?.." - walked away around the time when the guy got dragged under his bed by the toe-lady. I've seen this movie a thousand times. Not _this_ exact movie, but this movie has been overdone
I find the criticism that this movie isn't scary enough for horror audiences to be a strange one. I think as someone who isn't a horror movie enthusiast myself, I don't look at scary movies and judge them as to whether they appeal to true horror fans or whatever. The gory/horrific moments in this movie have just as much appeal to mainstream audiences that occasionally indulge in horror, which is why I think it's not that unbelievable to think that this movie is targeted for pre-teens and teens now, as well as being a nostalgic movie for adults who grew up with the books to check out.
So disappointing, considering some of the stories in the books genuinely scared me as a kid.
Yeah man, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre freaked me out as a kid but as soon as I realised it wasn't real??? What a lame movie