@@SpamNinja1 much worthier , 8 true cores vs 6, much better in the future. in deed if can, go for 9900x :v , it's ok with 12 cores and less hot than 7000series
I wonder if the 9700X suffers from a lack of optimization. A year from now, testing against the latest games or updated versions of these games, might the 9700X fare better? In fact, looking at the test setup, I wonder if a motherboard firmware update might make a difference. Only time will tell.
@KENKAZAMA69 I question the negativity that I have seen around the web about it, then. For 65W, it's pretty good and a lot of people are intersted in lower power, highly efficient components. If it can be pushed to 120W with a corresponding increase in performance, that should make the other side of the enthusiast camp happy. Not exactly the best of both worlds, but potentially pretty good at either world.
Because lower resolution results in higher CPU usage and lower GPU usage, while at 1440p and higher resolutions the load shifts more to the GPU. That's why most CPU benchmarks are conducted at 1080p.
![Почему Интел - это контора 3,14.. [+ тесты Core Ultra]](/img/n.gif)
You are the coolest channel alive, I was just searching for this. You show it just in time!
Obrigado ☺️
Performances would be very close with a midrange GPU
Would it be worth it to buy the 7700x rather than the ryzen 5 7600x for a rtx 4070 super gpu? Is there still a 10% difference?
@@SpamNinja1 much worthier , 8 true cores vs 6, much better in the future. in deed if can, go for 9900x :v , it's ok with 12 cores and less hot than 7000series
I will buy the 9700x with a rx 7900 gre cause the cpu Costa 333,00€ for me@@SpamNinja1
@@nguyentuan-lo3yo 9900x is not really less hot and those extra cores are useless for gaming
@@SpamNinja1 no it would be like 1-2% difference in 1440p for most games
I wonder if the 9700X suffers from a lack of optimization. A year from now, testing against the latest games or updated versions of these games, might the 9700X fare better? In fact, looking at the test setup, I wonder if a motherboard firmware update might make a difference. Only time will tell.
@KENKAZAMA69 I question the negativity that I have seen around the web about it, then. For 65W, it's pretty good and a lot of people are intersted in lower power, highly efficient components. If it can be pushed to 120W with a corresponding increase in performance, that should make the other side of the enthusiast camp happy. Not exactly the best of both worlds, but potentially pretty good at either world.
Do you think you could post a 7600x3d bench?
I'm working on this. I think this week I will post a first bench. Against which CPU? Any wishes.
@@hardwareforgamers- 7600x3d vs 7700x vs 7900x3d vs 9700x would be best
@@hardwareforgamers- 7600x vs 7700x vs 7600x3d vs 7500f fs
is that with Windows 11 Branch Prediction update? (KB5041587)
why is there not so much difference in 2K fps with other processors, unlike full hd
Because lower resolution results in higher CPU usage and lower GPU usage, while at 1440p and higher resolutions the load shifts more to the GPU. That's why most CPU benchmarks are conducted at 1080p.
I rly need a 4090....
These benches are BS.
There is not a single video of their hardware.
This why ryzen 9000 is trush
It's like going from a 3060 to 4060 with around same performance but just less power draw.
Он расчитан на 12 винду и там допилят софт
Where is the less power dram. 7600/7700 non x have the same results with the same tdp as the 9000 series
7600x is trash. Look at 7500f
nah, its basicaly a 7600 with broken iGPU.
That iGPU will be usefull when troubleshooting the GPU. I have used the iGPU many times now in the BIOS.