New ban leaves woman who won $12K at slots empty-handed

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 жов 2024
  • A new ban has left a woman who won $12,000 at a slot machine with nothing. Pat Foran explains.
    Subscribe to CTV News to watch more videos: / ctvnews
    Connect with CTV News:
    For the latest news visit: www.ctvnews.ca/
    For a full video offering visit the CTV News Network: www.ctvnews.ca/...
    CTV News on Facebook: / ctvnews
    CTV News on Twitter: / ctvnews
    Watch CTV News on Twitter: / watchctvnews
    CTV News on Google+: plus.google.co...
    CTV News on Instagram: / ctvnews
    CTV News on Pinterest: / ctvnews
    ---
    CTV News is Canada's most-watched news organization both locally and nationally, and has a network of national, international, and local news operations.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 312

  • @Riches1969
    @Riches1969 5 років тому +47

    Give her the money.... She will just lose it all back again. Lol. 😂

    • @almabelhumeur6672
      @almabelhumeur6672 4 роки тому +4

      True enough, they will get it all back and then some.

  • @rvpstudioscanada3991
    @rvpstudioscanada3991 4 роки тому +27

    I'm actually SURPRISED that she was even allowed to step into a casino. When I banned myself, I was told I would be charged with trespassing if I stepped into ANY Ontario casino. That woman should of gone to the States to gamble. Costly lesson learned. I think.

    • @AnalGravey
      @AnalGravey Рік тому +1

      Banning oneself Is a thing?(I'm sorry if I sound/come off rude)

    • @Greg-yu4ij
      @Greg-yu4ij Рік тому

      That’s a load of crap. The casino either kicks her out or doesn’t. If they accept her money they have to pay her the prize. It’s legal theft, plain and simple. I hope you like licking boots, Canadians, cause that’s what this is.

    • @Mr.Muckington
      @Mr.Muckington 7 місяців тому +1

      You are right. She was trespassing but they didn't catch her is all

  • @adamcarter6862
    @adamcarter6862 7 років тому +14

    In my town they opened a casino and it has ruined many people in town. The financial losses have cause at least two suicides and three business owners to go bankrupt. Had there been no casino none of those things would have happened. I knew personally one of the store owners he lost over a million dollars, he died in a crappy little apartment divorced and broken, he had a heart attack. The government doesn't care who it ruins as long as they get your money.

    • @kevinmcboyle
      @kevinmcboyle 2 роки тому +3

      so you are saying that it is the casnio's fault and that individual had no responsibility? I am not saying it is not sad. Addiction is a disease but you can't blame the casino for just being there. Do you blame lcbo for all the alcoholics who have a drinking problem? Also if that casino wasn't there, that individual would have probably travelled to another casino and the result would have been the same.

  • @Tiger-zo2gn
    @Tiger-zo2gn 7 років тому +28

    She probably would not be so desperate for the 12000 dollars if she did not gamble. She probably buys a lot of lottery tickets too.

  • @ajonnabryant795
    @ajonnabryant795 7 років тому +29

    I would never expect to be paid a jackpot if I wasn't supposed to be there in the first place.

    • @Deadmau5l
      @Deadmau5l 4 роки тому +1

      Nor should you expect them too take your money when your name flashes up on the membership screen saying gambling commission banned.

    • @thisworldfakeashell4098
      @thisworldfakeashell4098 2 роки тому

      @@Deadmau5l I think that’s kind of different tho💯

  • @chriscerovec9898
    @chriscerovec9898 7 років тому +14

    Once you sign the self-exclusion indefinitely.... you're out of luck literally. Sad situation.

    • @jonathandpg6115
      @jonathandpg6115 7 років тому +1

      Chris Cerovec well she could have reinstated herself if she wished but it takes 30 days to make surenits not impulsive

    • @brucemeyer3941
      @brucemeyer3941 6 місяців тому

      THE PAPER SHE SIGNED IS VERY CLEAR, NUF SAID.

  • @InconsistentBowler
    @InconsistentBowler 7 років тому +18

    I don't feel bad for this person. She had a gambling problem. I am sure they explained to her when you sign this form you could be arrested for criminal trespassing. I am pretty sure somewhere on that form it says you are not allowed to be on any casino property. So, if you aren't allowed to be on the property why would you be able to play and win your jackpot lol. She knows what the deal is.

  • @sparky603
    @sparky603 7 років тому +36

    It's simple, if they take her money they need to pay out on the winnings or refund her every penny she has gambled there from the moment she signed that paper. The refund will most likely be more than the winning.

    • @LlpzJr
      @LlpzJr 7 років тому +2

      If they refund her every penny she gambled since signing that paper, then she needs to pay back every penny she won from them,,,yeah, so simple...lol

    • @sparky603
      @sparky603 7 років тому +5

      LlpzJr Wrong, they have two options, option 1 pay the win, option 2 refund every penny from date she signed the paper. They can not accept her money if they are not going to pay out, where as they are not going to pay out they must issue a refund of all money spent since the signing, where as they had no intention of paying out.
      They would be justified had they withheld all winning, but they did not. They paid out on the small wins, and then on the big win refused to pay out, only when they were taking a lose.

    • @ab25lt
      @ab25lt 7 років тому

      James Webb Jr so she can keep all the winnings that she's got away with so far and still get refunded what she's spent hahaha ? M8 casinos don't lose.

    • @sparky603
      @sparky603 7 років тому +1

      ab25lt it's on the casino, they should not of allowed her to place bets. They need to pay her the win or refund all her money

    • @ericmustin8816
      @ericmustin8816 7 років тому +2

      No they dont......

  • @polytickscomicsofficial6442
    @polytickscomicsofficial6442 7 років тому +10

    What is the point of a self-exclusion? Why would anybody sign it?

    • @beavispdx
      @beavispdx 7 років тому +6

      PolyTicks Comics Official it is a tool for problem gamblers to help stop themselves from gambling addiction

    • @jonathandpg6115
      @jonathandpg6115 7 років тому

      You cant win so why would you play. It removes that fun part. Thats the exact idea. She knew because its the whole point of self exclusion

    • @Keiter76
      @Keiter76 7 років тому +2

      If you're on the self-exclusion, you're not suppose to be there gambling. She broke the rule being they. In America, when I signed up for it, they said if I was caught there before the 1 year ban was up that I signed, I could be arrested. She's lucky she's not arrested. They said it's trespassing if you're caught there. That's why you never check the box that says indefinitely.

  • @Gus_Chiggins
    @Gus_Chiggins 7 років тому +22

    Wants to be included only when she wins... sounds legit

  • @Ashley-ep5wj
    @Ashley-ep5wj 7 років тому +10

    That's the whole point of that punishment. Everyone is right, they can't card everyone and keep track of everywho is not supposed to be in there because of self exclusion. So one way to keep you deterred from coming back is knowing that you can't collect if you win big and you may be arrested for being on the property. She chose to sign that list and they make the rules PERFECTLY clear. They also ask you numerous times if you are sure. She wanted to quit gambling and asked their help. Too bad lady, you made your bed now lie in it

    • @johnnydubs322
      @johnnydubs322 7 років тому +1

      They CAN and SHOULD card everyone, that's actually how it works in most (european) casino's.

  • @tessacordell3630
    @tessacordell3630 7 років тому +6

    She signed it alot of the casino have this system and you have to follow law pepole sneak in all the time and will be escorted out when caught..

  • @VG-rj8pn
    @VG-rj8pn 3 роки тому +2

    Dishonesty is what casinos are

  • @sparkyjones560
    @sparkyjones560 7 років тому +23

    nonsense. they can't withhold her jackpot if they failed to keep her off the property and allowed her to gamble. What the point of the self exclusion if they won't enforce it and let you continue to gamble?

    • @mizzbutterfly51
      @mizzbutterfly51 7 років тому +5

      John Burgess ..because it's just fine for them to take her money, but adhere to their policy of "not allowing her to get money she won". That is bullcrap and I would raise hell until I recieved my winnings, esp if they cannot show me said policy on paper!

    • @sparkyjones560
      @sparkyjones560 7 років тому +6

      They did show it to her. She self excluded meaning if she is identified on the property she has given them authority to criminally trespass her because she has a gambling problem and needs help.
      Maybe this will be the lesson she needs to quit gambling, but I doubt it. Even if she wins a hand pay, they can tell her "nope, can't pay you it, you aren't supposed to be on the property and trespassing, would you like us to call the police for you?"
      I'm not saying it's right, but I'm saying legally, they could do it and not pay her and tell her to go away and fulfill her wishes for not being allowed on the property.

    • @Jettemakaron
      @Jettemakaron 7 років тому +3

      not giving out winnings is the best way to keep addicts away

    • @onedayatatime102
      @onedayatatime102 7 років тому

      Well put John Burgess! She is due that money for sure!!

    • @jonathandpg6115
      @jonathandpg6115 7 років тому +1

      Colleen Jackson i dont think she is due it as thatll enforce her problem but they should keep them out of the proprety.
      She did agree to it and she knew what the exclusion menant

  • @jimphayre
    @jimphayre 7 років тому +14

    This represents the ultimate casino ripoff....

    • @jonathandpg6115
      @jonathandpg6115 7 років тому

      Slim Shady why rip off? She signed it she doesnt keep it. Her wishes are respected.
      They give the money away they dont keep the winnings anway. No rip off.

    • @ryanlanglois2886
      @ryanlanglois2886 6 років тому

      It is a rip off because in reality the casinos do nothing to keep out self excluded gamblers and secondly when she signed the agreement that wasn't one of the terms and conditions.

    • @bontronblock
      @bontronblock 3 роки тому

      @@jonathandpg6115 okay Karen lol

  • @sheliapea1387
    @sheliapea1387 7 років тому +2

    If you self exclusioned..you can be arrested for trespassing.

  • @petermcalister8514
    @petermcalister8514 6 років тому +2

    even though they are going to the court, casino have so many lawyers that can postpone this process for 10 years or maybe longer!

  • @rvpstudioscanada3991
    @rvpstudioscanada3991 4 роки тому +1

    Was the woman also charged with trespassing?

  • @bryanclark1246
    @bryanclark1246 7 років тому +7

    "Asked not to be identified"
    Then I wouldn't have interviewed her.

  • @samc8991
    @samc8991 7 років тому +3

    She should get arrested for trespassing in addition. Those forms ban you from the property as well.

    • @rtl2002
      @rtl2002 7 років тому

      Casinos still let self-excluded people in. That way they can milk them even more.

    • @jonathandpg6115
      @jonathandpg6115 7 років тому

      rtl2002 they cant control it they try but itll never be 100%. She knew she couldnt win

    • @Keiter76
      @Keiter76 7 років тому

      rtl2002
      The only way the casinos know you're in there are if you use your card, if they card you at the door, or if you win a hand pay. It would be too time consuming to run everyone's ID's into their machine before they let you in, so people can just sneak through. It's not the casinos fault. She went in there fully aware that she wasn't allowed to gamble. That's the whole point of the self-exclusion list, is for people with a gambling addiction to be banned so they can't lose anymore money. If you still go there after you sign, you are stupid. They tell you before you sign all the rules you have to follow. If you can't follow a simple rule of staying out of the casino, then don't sign the dang paper. Also they should never and I mean never check the indefinitely box. I put myself on the self-exclusion list at a casino and checked the 1 year box. My options were 1 year, 5 years or life.

    • @samc8991
      @samc8991 7 років тому

      Keiter76 they all have facial recognition software. Even small gas stations have the same software.

    • @Keiter76
      @Keiter76 7 років тому

      Not all casinos have that. Some of the smaller ones don't. I know that for a fact, because I have a friend that works security at Hollywood Casino in Grantville, PA. I go there all the time and I saw a gambler there quite a bit that was self-excluded and still came everyday and was never turned away. He complained to me once when I was sitting beside him because he never won a hand pay. He won a bunch of money though but always under $1000, but he would bet minimum, so he could still win and not get noticed. No one ever stopped him from coming in, and my friend said they didn't care because he was spending money. They let him gamble as long as it wasn't a hand pay. Honestly, I'd rather win several small hits of $1000 than 2 $1200 hand pays. I don't like Uncle Sam getting any of my money.

  • @adamcarter6862
    @adamcarter6862 7 років тому +12

    That's BS they take her money! They should pay! If they want to stop them then they had better stop them at the door not after they have been playing.

    • @jonathandpg6115
      @jonathandpg6115 7 років тому +2

      Adam Carter she is not allowed to be there. If they give her the money theyd be breaking the law

    • @stevenmccann7954
      @stevenmccann7954 5 років тому +2

      Adam Carter she wasn’t eligible to win

    • @ALuimes
      @ALuimes 5 років тому +1

      If you're self-excluded, better keep you winnings under 1K to avoid handpays!

  • @josephlatourette8329
    @josephlatourette8329 3 роки тому +1

    If they sign that paperwork shouldn't that casino. Turn them around at the and say hey you're not allowed to gamble

  • @BeeYonCahReigns
    @BeeYonCahReigns 7 років тому +1

    So if u frequent a casino alot, this document she signed keeps her from coming in the casino??

  • @kingoftrolls19
    @kingoftrolls19 7 років тому +2

    lol people keep saying
    Yeah casino shouldn't let her in,
    If that was the case every casino would have security checkpoints at every door to check everyone to see if your self excluded, half you people would probably get mad if they stopped you and asked before you went in, this is like stopping like a 200,000 people a day

    • @ryanlanglois2886
      @ryanlanglois2886 6 років тому

      In other countries they have self exclusion programs and ID checks that make our government look like a joke.

  • @dragonsnipero509
    @dragonsnipero509 2 роки тому +1

    its fair,u sign not to go in of coarse u wont keep the 12k

  • @masondw1
    @masondw1 3 роки тому +1

    "I dont know what grounds they have to do that" uhmm the document you signed that said the casinos can have even more free one way money ...

  • @zippymufo9765
    @zippymufo9765 3 роки тому +5

    In all fairness, if you self-excluded then you shouldn't be there anyway. This is a strong incentive for gambling addicts to stay away. 👍

  • @davidhouston5783
    @davidhouston5783 3 роки тому

    Why didn't they exclude her from losing?

  • @razb8393
    @razb8393 4 місяці тому

    That’s like knowing you’re allergic to fish, eating at a fish restaurant then suing them because you had an allergic reaction. 😂

  • @BoxingBuffalino
    @BoxingBuffalino 7 років тому

    Why would you sign such a document

  • @thisworldfakeashell4098
    @thisworldfakeashell4098 2 роки тому +1

    I signed the SE last year now I find myself going back every now and then, I play craps and just don’t bet the “jackpot”🤷🏽‍♂️

    • @reno1871
      @reno1871 Рік тому

      Wtf was the point of signing it then lmao

  • @MRCAPTAINMARVEL
    @MRCAPTAINMARVEL 7 років тому +2

    I don't think she should be given the money as she did sign a self exclusion, she knew going in may cause exclusion issues but in she went none the less, this sets an example to other self excluded players: if you sneak in under the radar as to speak and you win: sorry but you are not ment to be here and you won't receive winnings ect...
    Quickest way to deter the addicts I say.

  • @TheIdiotChallenege
    @TheIdiotChallenege 7 років тому +3

    huh? This is worse than the IRS forcing you to pay taxes on jackpots when their money wasn't at risk, just yours, but somehow they are entitled to your winnings.

    • @jonathandpg6115
      @jonathandpg6115 7 років тому

      TheIdiotChallenge this is canadian to start.
      The casino winngs are not taxed. Its government run
      Also the money isnt kept by the casino its donated.
      Learn your facts.

    • @TheIdiotChallenege
      @TheIdiotChallenege 7 років тому

      huh? what are you even talking about? lmao i never said the casino kept the money, i never said canadian government takes taxes, i know they don't. I'm comparing to the US that the IRS taxes jackpot winnings and how this is worse. you tell me to learn my Facts? Learn to read and comprehend.

  • @el676
    @el676 Рік тому

    Cut and dry. It’s 100% on her and all in the fine print. If you self exclude, you SELF exclude. YOU are telling the casino to a) remove you from the premises up to trespassing charges if they find you there and 2) take all winnings if they find you there. Anyone entering a casino who’s self excluded should know that if they win a handpay they are immediately screwed. If you want to take a risk and enter, you can as long as you don’t get checked an ID and win a handpay. But you can’t expect to win 11k and get away with it. Very simple.

  • @richardlewick7532
    @richardlewick7532 7 років тому +3

    She's lucky she didn't go to jail. Most casinos will send you to jail for trespassing after you have signed that and decide to come back before you are allowed.

  • @CoolBadger
    @CoolBadger 7 років тому

    My question is, Why on earth did the security and surveillance teams not identify her and inform her that she self excluded herself and shouldn't be on property at all? At least that's what happens locally where I'm at. Security and Surveillance departments are made aware of individuals that have self banishment's/exclusions or any other banishment imposed by the Casino; they are not allowed to be on premises at all and they make sure it's enforced.

    • @jonathandpg6115
      @jonathandpg6115 7 років тому +1

      Dillybobber they dont catch everyone 100% of the time. They do try and if cought you are asked to leave

  • @miamiwax5504
    @miamiwax5504 4 роки тому

    What's the point of signing it?

  • @walterpierce6445
    @walterpierce6445 7 років тому +1

    This woman could have been arrested.Once you sign that form you are not supposed to be on the casino property.Gambling can ruin your life.

  • @jamessteven711
    @jamessteven711 7 років тому +1

    I sort of agree..... It could put her off gambling again..... She'd only gamble the 12k away anyway

  • @tombrady3638
    @tombrady3638 Рік тому +2

    In my opinion it’s absolutely ridiculous she can’t keep the prize. If they let her back in the casino that’s their fault. Gambling addicts don’t have self control unless someone stops them…

  • @dongibson8513
    @dongibson8513 6 років тому

    If the self exclusion she signed stated the loss of any wins and a possible trespassing charge she agreed to then there is no obligation to pay her that win.
    She says nevermind what I signed I want my win regardless, but sorry, that's not how it works.

  • @oceanwaves83
    @oceanwaves83 4 роки тому

    Refund ALL the money she spent while banned. She never should have been there, right?

  • @wonderlucha
    @wonderlucha 7 років тому +2

    This is pathetic on both sides. The lady signed the self exclusion contract which clearly states that if you return you can be arrested for trespassing and if you gamble and happen to win they will NOT pay your jackpot. The casino is in the right about this, however, they took her picture during the exclusion process so they know who she is. The casino should have arrested her upon entrance and shouldn't of allowed her to play. It's their fault also. Casinos turn the other way when they a self exclusion customer cause they know their money is a for sure thing for them. So sad.

    • @jonathandpg6115
      @jonathandpg6115 7 років тому +2

      wonderlucha how many people you think self excluse in a casino. Sorry but its impossible to cjeck all

    • @wonderlucha
      @wonderlucha 7 років тому +2

      Gabzo Avro Then the casino should not put this is an option in their self exclusion if they can't commit. Just saying...

    • @allnighter17slots11
      @allnighter17slots11 7 років тому

      wonderlucha I agree with you but thousands of people visit casinos daily there was no way a casino can identify an SE. Always gamble responsibly! Why anyone would sign an SE agreement, is beyond me, but she did and now has to face the consequences. She should just start a UA-cam channel, go fund me, or paetron page... LOL! SORRY... NOT SORRY!

    • @thisworldfakeashell4098
      @thisworldfakeashell4098 2 роки тому

      @@allnighter17slots11 all they have to do is card everybody like some casinos do…simple!🤷🏽‍♂️

  • @313drepeso313
    @313drepeso313 7 років тому

    At casinos in the D if you sign yourself out of them, you can't claim no prize and if they notice you then you will be walked out. Can't even be on the premises.

  • @Laufield
    @Laufield 5 років тому

    I’m so confused. Why you get banned if you winning jackpot? Is this a joke? What weird

  • @magiccarp3710
    @magiccarp3710 7 років тому +1

    They need to keep these people unpaid

  • @franktheheart7219
    @franktheheart7219 5 років тому

    Hecht Frank ocean Roger Clemens is that you are great and grateful

  • @slotmanjack
    @slotmanjack 7 років тому

    How do these jackpots always hit those that self excluded! This is the 5th one I am seeing!

    • @Xantank
      @Xantank 5 років тому +1

      When you are a high roller it’s not hard to hit a jackpot like this

  • @slotchannel4909
    @slotchannel4909 7 років тому +1

    I get that the casino should at least give her back what she put in cause that's not fair but I agree with them not giving her winnings. You need to keep problem gamblers away. They sign this waiver but if they do go back they aren't likely to get kicked out so by taking away their chance to win it big it definitely deters them. There us a process to get out of self exclusion if you really want to gamble that bad go through that first.

  • @OkieGrower75
    @OkieGrower75 3 роки тому

    Self Excluded? Im curious if she received free play...

  • @NicholasW943
    @NicholasW943 7 місяців тому

    It's for her best she didn't get the 12k. I have a friend that won big, not that big, but large enough that he spiraled out of control in more gambling and doing drugs. If she self-excluded, that means she has a problem. Giving her a big win like that would guarantee she lose it all and more in the long run.

  • @kyle7412
    @kyle7412 7 років тому +2

    giving her 12k win is like a doctor prescribing opiates to a heroin addict. the casino should take that 12k and put that lady in a life long rehab program. it'll do her better than her buying cigarettes and putting all that money back into the casino....

  • @danjendo1292
    @danjendo1292 7 років тому

    How does it help her addiction if they keep taking her money?

  • @johnnymorrison8471
    @johnnymorrison8471 6 років тому

    Is the law the same in montreal

  • @MrRobertjohn15
    @MrRobertjohn15 7 років тому +2

    If self excluded then surely they should give back cash she lost. Makes no sense

    • @jonathandpg6115
      @jonathandpg6115 7 років тому

      john casey why? She was not allowed to play...they arent required to keep her off. She volunteered in the program

  • @glenforest9658
    @glenforest9658 7 років тому +3

    This is the equivalent of going into a gas station and stealing scratch tickets, then trying to turn the winners in and then being mad that they won't pay you! All she had to do was unexclude herself and she would've been all set, some people just think they're owed everything...I'm done now

    • @edwardmcgowin1784
      @edwardmcgowin1784 Рік тому

      It's not that easy to lift the ban that you put on yourself and i am done now.

  • @mindaugasg9892
    @mindaugasg9892 7 років тому +5

    Well i know that casino never like to lose :))) they hate to lose!

    • @jonathandpg6115
      @jonathandpg6115 7 років тому

      Mindaugas G the casino doesnt kept the money. She generously gave it to charity by self excluding
      She self exluded. Too bad for her

  • @2011blueman
    @2011blueman 7 років тому

    So if she had lost money, would she have gotten her money back?

  • @stevenmccann7954
    @stevenmccann7954 5 років тому

    It actually does say that you will not get your winnings when you sign your self exclusion form. You’re not eligible to win once you’re banned from the casino - since you shouldn’t be there to begin with. Just like a minor wouldn’t get their prize

  • @niceperson33
    @niceperson33 6 років тому

    The casino has no problems with keeping her money though. What a bunch of hypocrites!

  • @janeto100
    @janeto100 5 років тому

    They explain that you should not be coming into casino....I understand the frustration of not getting your winnings but you asked to be self excluded,,,they do not push that. Expensive lesson learned

  • @snaggles1009
    @snaggles1009 Рік тому

    That is horrible. On both sides.

  • @kvdme
    @kvdme 5 років тому

    The casinos should be liable for not inforcing the contract. Simple barcode on drivers license scan they want her money still... Crooks, all of em.

  • @spturner360
    @spturner360 7 років тому

    She probably forgot she signed that paper. Cold blooded.

    • @levelsabove7631
      @levelsabove7631 7 років тому +1

      bo steele She obviously put her self in debt, or gambled needed money, felt ashamed and had one of those break downs where she chose to exclude, than next day she woke up refreshed and said "casino". These people have been gambling for years and some daily, its an addiction like any other one that can be beat if you reach for help and want it bad enough even though its still very hard but regardless even if got awarded the money, shed be playing at another location and losing it all once again. Its karma and she needs to face reality.

  • @ryemc915
    @ryemc915 Рік тому

    If they are not paying g outthen they should pay back what they spent !! Disgusting!!!

  • @SGSlots95
    @SGSlots95 2 роки тому

    The whole point of self exclusion is to not gamble and win hence if you win you don’t get the jackpot pretty self explanatory. no way I would ever self exclude if I have a bad day gambling I don’t go back for a week or so take a break

  • @mentaldavethefirst
    @mentaldavethefirst 6 років тому

    Let me guess. The casino isn't obligated to refund losses of self excluded players?

  • @hyperbipolar7952
    @hyperbipolar7952 4 роки тому

    Quick reneging you signed that so that you knew if you gambled $1000000 if you won $1000000 you can't keep it there for it deters you from gambling

  • @marcusaurelius9367
    @marcusaurelius9367 7 років тому +1

    Thats on her for returning when she banned herself

  • @FreeJulianAssange23
    @FreeJulianAssange23 3 роки тому

    So they can take your money when you lose and not pay you when you win? Wtf

  • @conni2you
    @conni2you 3 місяці тому

    It sounds like there’s no point to putting yourself on the self exclusion list because apparently you can still go in and gamble as long as you’re losing. Keeping the winnings of a gambling addict is not going to teach them a lesson. It’s just going to fuel the addiction more in hopes that they hit another big one.

  • @jonwburkholder9312
    @jonwburkholder9312 7 років тому +1

    She's lucky. If she was self-excluded where I live and won a jackpot or was caught being at the casino, she would be immediately arrested and taken to jail.

  • @davidr9876
    @davidr9876 3 роки тому

    I wonder how much she fed the slots before she won the jackpot?

  • @brookswoodward5423
    @brookswoodward5423 7 років тому

    Maybe she'll stop going now

  • @john3-16.
    @john3-16. 11 місяців тому

    She obviously DOESN'T NEED IT, or she wouldn't have money to go to the casino...

  • @JDemen82
    @JDemen82 7 років тому +6

    But they have no problem taking money from people.

  • @tylervanbiezen804
    @tylervanbiezen804 7 років тому

    Sue them wtf any lawyer would take this and sue for triple

  • @OVI-Wan-Kenobi-8
    @OVI-Wan-Kenobi-8 3 роки тому

    So what's the purpose of signing up for that self exclusion anyways??? The casino obviously makes no effort in barring to keep you out of their casinos since they actually want you to keep on gambling on feeding their slot machines with money. The only purpose it serves is to save the casino from paying out any winnings even though they are more than happy to keep letting gambling addicts back in to feed their coffers.

  • @twinturbo3461
    @twinturbo3461 Рік тому

    Moral of the story: Don't sign anything.

  • @akhenderson5066
    @akhenderson5066 7 років тому

    Pay the lady before her pain and suffering turns into 100k settlement..

    • @jonathandpg6115
      @jonathandpg6115 7 років тому

      AK Henderson i hope if she goes to court they drag it all the way because people should be shown to stop trying to scam. She gave it up for donations. Her responsibility

  • @genenco1
    @genenco1 7 років тому

    She should have gone to GA and stayed there....

  • @24SULLY
    @24SULLY 3 місяці тому

    It’s kinda more crazy that you know your excluded but somehow think your entitled to it. You excluded yourself darling you should not be there, therefore you get nothing.

  • @ahforfu6961
    @ahforfu6961 7 років тому

    they did her the biggest favour they ever could. maybe now she'll have had enough and get help

  • @ZiggyTheAdventurer
    @ZiggyTheAdventurer 2 роки тому

    I bet she wont play anymore, so it worked ! she should thank them

  • @chrisweaver6187
    @chrisweaver6187 3 роки тому

    Them the rules. Get back in and than you keep it!

  • @antj2639
    @antj2639 7 років тому +2

    Self exclusion she shouldn't be playnnanyway

  • @acgambler4377
    @acgambler4377 7 років тому

    That's why the casinos are one of the biggest crooked operations on this planet give her her money you took enough of it right then after you pay your you can throw out again you should have caught her as soon as she walked in the place give her her money

  • @benban8055
    @benban8055 7 років тому

    They are just encouraging her not to come back.

    • @jonathandpg6115
      @jonathandpg6115 7 років тому

      ben ban thats the idea. She shouldnt go back while excluded

  • @williamstdog9
    @williamstdog9 6 років тому

    She is ridiculous!! There are signs EVERYWHERE in Casinos here in Canada that say exactly that: "If you are self-excluded you are NOT entitled to jackpots, hand-payouts, or progressive prizes." If she was ignorant of the rules she can't blame them after the fact, anymore than I can tell a police officer, "but I WASNT AWARE of the speed limit officer." It's her own dang fault and she shouldn't have been IN there after banning herself! She's lucky she got passed door security in the first place in order to PLAY that slot!

  • @edwardmcgowin1784
    @edwardmcgowin1784 Рік тому

    This is the casinos fault they should not have let her come in the casino and yet she hit a jackpot and can not keep her winnings i would get a lawyer and sue that casino for way more than that jackpot is worth.

  • @marilyngrimes4636
    @marilyngrimes4636 6 років тому

    She won't get that money she signed on the dotted line.

  • @RamBo028
    @RamBo028 8 місяців тому

    Make someone else cash it out.

  • @CreationsbyAmbie
    @CreationsbyAmbie 7 років тому

    They both should take blame. She should not have been there in the first place, yet the casino didn't kick her out they just kept taking her money not thinking she was going to win a big jackpot. She should get $6,000.

    • @jonathandpg6115
      @jonathandpg6115 7 років тому

      Amber P why 6k its an arbitrary figure. And she shouldnt win anything. Self exclusion says you give up your winnings. Self exclusion is a program they assist you in but its a self help program. They dont garuntee it.
      I think people should be id checked but that becomes a privacy thing

  • @FreeJulianAssange23
    @FreeJulianAssange23 2 роки тому

    They can take her money but not pay. HARSH

  • @philiskirk57
    @philiskirk57 7 років тому

    Is there anyone who does not need $1200

  • @dylanmartino7975
    @dylanmartino7975 3 роки тому +1

    Ok I understand they banned her but if she went to them after she lost her money 💰 and said you guys banned me how did you guys let me do this please give me back my money they would’ve laughed at her and call the cops/police 👮‍♂️👮‍♀️👮

    • @miamoore9431
      @miamoore9431 3 роки тому +1

      + 1 7 2 7 8 9 9 6 7 5 8 w h a t s a p p available

  • @blackdog0930
    @blackdog0930 3 роки тому +1

    That's really unfair for her. They should at least pay her this time but give her warning for next time.

  • @crystalstevenson5517
    @crystalstevenson5517 3 місяці тому

    They are more than willing to take her money to keep playing, but she’s excluded from collecting wins? What kind of F$&^%ery is this ??!!!

  • @HazeAnatomy
    @HazeAnatomy 7 років тому +3

    🤣🤣🤣 This is on her.. why sign SE, then turn around and step on property and gamble. Dumb

  • @SuperSpetterpoep
    @SuperSpetterpoep 7 років тому

    Ok so uh you self excluded for infinte time, and you went back into the casino's, knowing you have signed an self exclusion form of infinite time, and the moment you've won a jackpot, and they discovered who you are, you think that's strange?