Bad news for sandra the new chinese space station requires a key to open the airlock..good news is the docking adapter is compitable with the US spacecraft
@@MFM230 Not Hans Zimmer m8. Steven Price did the soundtrack for this movie. It was his first time working on a major film such as gravity and the music you hear was only meant to be temporary. It wasn’t until the scene where the Iss was destroyed that director Alfonso Cuaron (pardon my spelling) realized he wasn’t going to get a better soundtrack. And guess what. The soundtrack won the Oscar
I just realised that every single person who isn't on earth in this movie besides 2 people either die or return to earth within the first 2 minutes. Thats freaky.
It's ironic that your name is Richard Parker because at the end of Gravity when Sandra Bullock is lying exhausted on the beach I half expected her to look up and see the Tiger from Life of Pi.
would that space suit be able to withstand the vacuum of space? i thought it was a flight suit which was only able to last a few minutes in an unpressurised area, not for EVAs, plus the thing doesn't seem to have an oxygen tank... I assume the umbilical is feeding her with oxygen...
The space station seems to be affected by strong wind currents. But Sandra Bullock is hardly affected by the wind, that little fire hydrant would not be enough to allow her to keep up with the station.
Dominic W or perhaps, “they” don’t understand the concept of that exaggerated amount of wind being presented (with all the station’s shaking parts to imply entry into the atmosphere) at that density of atmosphere and its effects in the “vacuum” of space....
What you don't understand, is that physics does not mean anything in this movie. This movie is not about physics... This movie is a about Life and Corrones. This movie is about faith to move forward even when Death is in front of you... _Interstellar : ...It is not possible... no, It is necessary!_ This is the beauty.
Notice that her space suit is not equipped with oxygen supply system. That should tell us something insightful regarding what has "really" happened to astronaut Ryan at this point of her "journey".
+Cesar Omiste There was air in her suit. If she was in space long enough to need an external supply she was dead anyway. She just needed protection from vacuum while she made the jump
According to the film's science adviser Kevin Grazier and NASA engineer Robert Frost, however, the pair are still decelerating with Stone's leg caught in the parachute cords from the Soyuz. The cords stretch as they absorb her kinetic energy. Kowalski thinks that the cords are not strong enough to absorb his kinetic energy as well as hers, and that he must release the tether to give Stone a chance of stopping before the cords fail and doom both of them.... but we aren't convinced of it.
This movie is so unrealistic. Hubble, ISS, Russian spy satellites, Chinese space station etc. are all orbiting at different altitudes and on different orbital paths. The space debris are moving so fast that it would be impossible to see them with naked eye. It may be a good movie for the average joe who knows shit about orbital mechanics but to Kerbal Space Program player and space enthusiast like me it is a load of bullcrap.
@@EmjoLab yeah i know it’s only for viewer entertainment but i get a little bit excited when i see a space movie that doesn’t look like rubbish then it’s got a bunch of unrealistic mumbo jumbo in it. just my opinion tho edit: typo
GRAVITY I'm not quitting: TRANSMITION.... Cómo podrá RESOLVER el problema de las funciones del Tablero, mirando el MANUAL, todo tiene ARREGLO,; pero en el TIEMPO tiene ser NOW no AFTER , El después puede CAMBIAR el DESTINO, Arreglemos el Ahora y Volvamos al Mañana.... Karina4ever FOREVER TIME......
Um--okay.......as much as I LUV geeking out over science fiction movies, she--uh--she has no air supply in the vacuum.......of space. I'm just saying.. Movies such as this are the reason why soooo many people are science illiterate. They believe stuff like this that they see in the movies over actual scientific fact simply because these scientific stereotypes still permeate the public domain : the one-in-a-billion longshot chance of getting back aboard a space station using nothing but a fire extinguisher to maneuver oneself through the vacuum of space--**where is her air supply**??!! One can only stretch the "fiction" part of science fiction but so far..
its not hugely unrealistic, u could do all these things is just a low chance u would make it with the extinguisher and jumping whilst in high atmosphere but its possible
pramudi sukamto Maybe, but I have to find out who composed the scores. Dramatic, chilling, and terrifying at times. The music is the real star of this film.
star wars is meant to be that way. It is supposed to represent a world that we can see ourselves in, yet know that its one we will never be able to experience. this movie just doesn't know how science works. this movie was trying to be accurate to real life and fell flat on its face.
+Ish Scientists proved that this could actually work but you would need more flight control systems because you dont know velocity of the station and yourself but technically the fire extinguisher would do a decent amount of thrust because its just a gas thats released very quickly (newtons 3rd law i think) every action has a reaction
+FreakGaming Funny that people can actually even use fire extinguishers without some sort of anchoring system and harness and warnings that anybody under 200lb should not use them due to the force. I understand Newton's 3rd law quite well. The same applies to the jet pack scenes in this movie. There is no way that they could move around that quickly. Please type in "extravehicular activity" into youtube and watch the real thing. These are jet packs specifically designed for this unlike a fire extinguisher....or are you just trolling?
Ish How is it trolling that i say its very realistic and could work. Its maybe so fast because after all its still a movie do you want to see 8 hours off orbital manouvering with a fire extinguisher ? :D
I forgot how stressful literally every single second of this movie was
Agreed.
It really is, in the best way possible. Absolute masterpiece of a cinema experience.
Matt Damon could learn a thing or two about airlocks
@Jay DiNItto perfection
Bad news for sandra the new chinese space station requires a key to open the airlock..good news is the docking adapter is compitable with the US spacecraft
You mean Dragon SpaceX.
Lucky it’s a story.
Gravity movie ryan stone want to the Chinese space station
0:40 looks like the director really loved Wall-E
(Kidding, i actually love both movies)
It's sad how people can't just enjoy things anymore without arguing.
What did you just say...?
hello from 2021. Welcome to Chinese space station
The background music is so awesome and inspirational. I listen to it whenever I need some motivation to do something really tough.
Hans Zimmer is great!
@@MFM230 Not Hans Zimmer m8. Steven Price did the soundtrack for this movie. It was his first time working on a major film such as gravity and the music you hear was only meant to be temporary. It wasn’t until the scene where the Iss was destroyed that director Alfonso Cuaron (pardon my spelling) realized he wasn’t going to get a better soundtrack. And guess what. The soundtrack won the Oscar
@@michaelvaughn3392 Thank you for your informative reply. I love soundtracks and best original scores.
@@michaelvaughn3392 Thank you!
Brilliant sequence with this high tension film.
I just realised that every single person who isn't on earth in this movie besides 2 people either die or return to earth within the first 2 minutes. Thats freaky.
When she flung that fire extinguisher behind her it caused her to accelerate slightly toward the space station. Hair enough to make a difference.
It's ironic that your name is Richard Parker because at the end of Gravity when Sandra Bullock is lying exhausted on the beach I half expected her to look up and see the Tiger from Life of Pi.
That would have been a great ending
@@lissmind11 lol no movie would be ruined..
@@Bluesmiley05 exactly!
Its funny that everyone leaves the doors unlocked on space stations.
They knew they were going to shoot a movie and left the doors unlocked. Actors were only asked to film quietly so as not to disturb the taikonauts.
Excellent work by this show
lol my teacher put an assignment to watch this clip
PLS SAME FOR NEWTONS THIRD LAW
same bahahah
lol same
2:20 is that kowalski's body flying few moment before the space garbage hit and ryan saw it right before she open the door
I slowed down to see it but it looks like debris.
I'm 99% positive it is his body
Looks like a flat chunk of debris at 0.25x. In the movie he has a pretty beefy EV suit.
would that space suit be able to withstand the vacuum of space? i thought it was a flight suit which was only able to last a few minutes in an unpressurised area, not for EVAs, plus the thing doesn't seem to have an oxygen tank... I assume the umbilical is feeding her with oxygen...
Maybe the air trapped in the suit was enough just for a couple of minutes
Thats a Russian space suit, it doesnt have a tank but it does have an oxygen hose en the middle.
The space lover passed by here. What an adventure.
didn’t know i could hold my breath for two minutes and 50 seconds but now I do
I think you got clips 9 and 10 backwards.
The space station seems to be affected by strong wind currents. But Sandra Bullock is hardly affected by the wind, that little fire hydrant would not be enough to allow her to keep up with the station.
I don't think you understand the concept of Relative velocities
Dominic W or perhaps, “they” don’t understand the concept of that exaggerated amount of wind being presented (with all the station’s shaking parts to imply entry into the atmosphere) at that density of atmosphere and its effects in the “vacuum” of space....
What you don't understand, is that physics does not mean anything in this movie.
This movie is not about physics... This movie is a about Life and Corrones.
This movie is about faith to move forward even when Death is in front of you... _Interstellar : ...It is not possible... no, It is necessary!_
This is the beauty.
What you people don't understand is this is a MOVIE.... Just shut the f*" up and enjoy it!!
I just noticed but this station was also going to hit another debris field, it's possible to see it at 2:20
That wasn't debris, it was a dead guy, kowalski was his character I believe
The best of the best.
Notice that her space suit is not equipped with oxygen supply system. That should tell us something insightful regarding what has "really" happened to astronaut Ryan at this point of her "journey".
+Cesar Omiste There was air in her suit. If she was in space long enough to need an external supply she was dead anyway. She just needed protection from vacuum while she made the jump
My feet are sweating watching this
my favorite part of the movie. yeeey!
is this a movie?? If it is what movie is it called??!!
Gravity
According to the film's science adviser Kevin Grazier and NASA engineer Robert Frost, however, the pair are still decelerating with Stone's leg caught in the parachute cords from the Soyuz. The cords stretch as they absorb her kinetic energy. Kowalski thinks that the cords are not strong enough to absorb his kinetic energy as well as hers, and that he must release the tether to give Stone a chance of stopping before the cords fail and doom both of them.... but we aren't convinced of it.
Well done.
Never saw her "enter" though...
Bloothoof device is connected uh successfully
looks like she destroyed our station😁
Well, it was falling out of orbit due to being unattended... much like your first one will in a few months, as intended by the Tiangong agency.
Yes she destroy it because Americanos love demolition..if its chinese its better...
@@pergamonify Yeeeeahhh.. Chinese built stuff and quality, who doesn't think of those two things together? ROFL.
it was the end of the whole space program for everybody, lol.
It's incredible that Sandra Bullock went into space and did her own stunts just for this movie.
Good Day Everyone
its mirrored,
Gravity 2013 should be in ps2 or PS3
Gravity and Interstelar Wow
今天中國天宮空間站跟義大利的一個太空人是不是很像呢
美國人要明白，他們遇到危難，他們有可能需要中國人拯救。
Everyone saw a battle toad?
knock knock
that was an interesting movie, not really within the realm of belief but that's the fun part. Making belief
space station
this is the maxuimum amount of Hollywood bullshit that can be packed into two minutes and fifty seconds
Ok zoomer
நமகிழ்ச்சிவாய 👤
This movie is so unrealistic. Hubble, ISS, Russian spy satellites, Chinese space station etc. are all orbiting at different altitudes and on different orbital paths. The space debris are moving so fast that it would be impossible to see them with naked eye. It may be a good movie for the average joe who knows shit about orbital mechanics but to Kerbal Space Program player and space enthusiast like me it is a load of bullcrap.
@@gabrielarthur9267 bruh, it is unrealistic though...
@@ExcaliburAero maybe its not made to be taken that seriously? When I watched the movie, yeah many things didn't seem right but I still enjoyed it lol
@@EmjoLab yeah i know it’s only for viewer entertainment but i get a little bit excited when i see a space movie that doesn’t look like rubbish then it’s got a bunch of unrealistic mumbo jumbo in it. just my opinion tho
edit: typo
@@ExcaliburAero I feel you.. I really love realistic space movies too
if you were to remove "Kerbal Space Program player" you actually GAIN credibility.
GRAVITY I'm not quitting: TRANSMITION....
Cómo podrá RESOLVER el problema de las funciones del Tablero, mirando el MANUAL, todo tiene ARREGLO,; pero en el TIEMPO tiene ser NOW no AFTER , El después puede CAMBIAR el DESTINO, Arreglemos el Ahora y Volvamos al Mañana....
Karina4ever FOREVER TIME......
Um--okay.......as much as I LUV geeking out over science fiction movies, she--uh--she has no air supply in the vacuum.......of space. I'm just saying..
Movies such as this are the reason why soooo many people are science illiterate. They believe stuff like this that they see in the movies over actual scientific fact simply because these scientific stereotypes still permeate the public domain : the one-in-a-billion longshot chance of getting back aboard a space station using nothing but a fire extinguisher to maneuver oneself through the vacuum of space--**where is her air supply**??!!
One can only stretch the "fiction" part of science fiction but so far..
She still has oxygen in the suit.
🎃
Fallen station is mir tiangong did not fall to earth
🤒
Yeah right lol so unrealistic
Dont mattee
its not hugely unrealistic, u could do all these things is just a low chance u would make it with the extinguisher and jumping whilst in high atmosphere but its possible
Seen worse cgi.
its not bad cgi tho, its real good quality actually
compare science and detail to starwars, force awakward more crap crap crap movie. leave alone science even story is crap like soap opera
pramudi sukamto Maybe, but I have to find out who composed the scores. Dramatic, chilling, and terrifying at times. The music is the real star of this film.
star wars is meant to be that way. It is supposed to represent a world that we can see ourselves in, yet know that its one we will never be able to experience. this movie just doesn't know how science works. this movie was trying to be accurate to real life and fell flat on its face.
I agree this movie is better then Star wars and endgame.
@@itsraventm You don't make sense. This movie had more knowledge then star wars. Do you really think a movie will have everything correct.
when the station is made in china☠
What a total crap movie, especially this scene! So unrealistic it makes me sick!
+Ish Scientists proved that this could actually work but you would need more flight control systems because you dont know velocity of the station and yourself but technically the fire extinguisher would do a decent amount of thrust because its just a gas thats released very quickly (newtons 3rd law i think) every action has a reaction
+FreakGaming Funny that people can actually even use fire extinguishers without some sort of
anchoring system and harness and warnings that anybody under 200lb should not
use them due to the force. I understand Newton's 3rd law quite well. The same applies to the jet pack scenes in this movie. There is no way that they could move around that quickly. Please type in "extravehicular activity" into youtube and watch the real thing. These are jet packs specifically designed for this unlike a fire extinguisher....or are you just trolling?
Ish How is it trolling that i say its very realistic and could work. Its maybe so fast because after all its still a movie do you want to see 8 hours off orbital manouvering with a fire extinguisher ? :D
+FreakGaming Ok fair enough, we can agree that they used some poetic license on this one :)
Why would you let the science ruin it? It's a great movie about a broken woman finding the will to live on!