Two methods of making energy are readily available to us, a two radius Atwood’s machine and the ‘cylinder and spheres’. An Atwood’s is simply a pulley; but the pulley can have two radii. But the drive radius can be much smaller than the radius of the pulley where the balanced mass is accelerated. The extra mass (100 g) or ‘drive mass’ can have a radius at 1 cm and the accelerated mass (200 g) at 10 cm. The energy increase is extremely large and is related to this radius difference. An Atwood’s can accelerate 200 grams at the 10 cm radius just as easily as it accelerates 2000 g at the 1 cm radius. But the energy is 10 times as much. ½ * 2 kg *1 m/sec * 1 m/sec = 1 J ½ * .2 kg * 10 m/sec * 10 m/sec = 10 J The ‘cylinder and sphere’ transfers the motion of a large mass to a small mass and gives you a huge increase in energy. Making these experiment would give us free energy.
I wanted to test the idea of gravity plus magnetic force. Am glad to see somebody is working on it. There is another thing you can add to the setup but I can't give you a clue because I want to do it by myself. Keep doing the great things.
The only "help" I can tell you try an even number of arms like 5 or 7 then other than the moment each arm passes the poles there is imbalance having one more arm always on that side, so with 5 arms there is 3 arms on one side vs 2 arms on the other, with 7 arms you get 4 to 3 arms. Anyway just a thought.
This is something I've been working on for a very long time. I had a slightly different approach in that I was basing my idea on keeping the centre off centre on a permanent basis. My biggest problem was a lack off proper equipment to make the components properly. I was using weights on shafts that were guided by an off centre guiding channel. I made a couple of the engines without success but maybe I'll try again sometime. I know it can work. I did think of the use of liquid but in curved tubes, in my head it works
Good on you mate, you're keeping at it with the same enthusiasm that was evident in your older videos. Fantastic to see such a never-say-die attitude in combination with your extensive background and your willingness to embrace new technology to produce new ideas. You are the perfect example of scientific endeavour, personified, and I take my hat off to you.
Only problem is, gravity is just as balanced as those gates your trying to get thru. It's great that you are experimenting and trying to figure it out! Keeps our minds alive!
Fantastic work! Questions/ideas.. Are you familiar with Bhãskara’s wheel design? I’d imagine it would give a better balance to weight distribution? Could a liquid such as gallium, Mercury or ferro fluids be beneficial? With or with out added magnet.. gravitational/mag gate influence is definitely an exciting addition to such a design. Thank you for sharing your experiments, it’s great to see someone trying such ideas and showing the progression.
Bro, as your new fan and sub I ask...no I demand you ignore haters.....just keep going....one day I'll explain why it took me 27 years to complete my project....I competed against the biggest companies you know today....and in the end I did it.....and sold and signed my voice away to ever speak about it... but they can never quiet my passion and help I give to elderly and homeless and sick and handicap and on.....you do your thing.....I am going to to watch from here as of now....best!! 😎
Great efforts in both the hydro mechanics and magnetic and also the combination of the two. I liked your two sentences describing the 3D printing. The description was better than the dedicated videos on the matter. As a thank you, I hope that you consider my suggestion of placing several water wheels on the same axis but offset in an angle that the wheels cover the dead zones of each other, the more wheels you use the more stability and speed the wheels would gain. The same principle can be used for magnet wheels.
thank that was a great video and you just saved me some time. on a design I had already started. I still think the best way is to transfer the water all the way down to the opposite end. Never thought about an air tube to help with transfer though.
An honest observation: Whatever you "gain" on the DOWNWARD side of the device (ie - the side which can use gravity) MUST be FULLY gained (and then some) on the UPWARD side of the device (ie - the side which must FIGHT the force of gravity) - in order to create even a single full rotation. Example: Try bouncing any kind of ball, from any height (say 6 feet for example). See if the ball ever bounces back to a height of 6 feet - or over. To be blunt, this is the EXACT same problem you are experiencing with this device. Just saying...
The "Principled Asymmetry" is a device in a similar classification--lateral support/ over-unity theory which, although not yet proven perpetual, was designed to use support from the fulcrum to reduce the resistance of throwing a weight downward--may have applications should be searchable under 'Coppedge'.
Love your channel. I'd try doubling your arms on that design, as the useful force of each thing- the water drop and the magnetic pull (or push, whichever way you've got that going) that seems spent before the next drop or pull is due to take place. I'd also try moving the gates, so the pull of one, helps drop the water, which will get the next magnet into the gate. I'm sure I'm a student saying dumb shit to the master here, but that's what I see. It's that one inch sort of problem, in both systems. there's gotta be a spot to play those off of each other at the right time. Dunno man, but I like where you're going with this. keep it up.
You are doing amazing work, hats off to you! I totally agree that there must be a solution combining different engineering principles, personally I think there is not enough consideration in regard to 3 dimensional applications i.e spherical magnetic arrangements, everything ive seen is linear or 2d. Good luck!
A suggestion, change the axis, each arm with a independent axis tha that shift the center of weight at lower point, would need some gears, the liquid don't move fast enough but maybe using gears you can make the two opposing arms change positions
Hi Sunshine, take a look at Viktor Schauberger "The Water Wizard" a more efficient way to transfer the water threw your pipe it may help you with a better design. May you enjoy peace an prosperity, while you manifest all the necessary Love an Light of Life!
Thanks. I have looked at some of his work, but I haven't implemented any of it into my designs as of yet. Thanks for the comment. Be blessed and do great things!
@@Motionmagnetics In mixing water and magnets, have you tried to use eletromagnet switched on only few instants per cycle (there must be a specific instant)? Maybe one on the bottom and other on the top, fixed... I know the objective is to get autonomous movement. However, you can think that in a car engine the electrical system generates the sparks to burn fuel.. Just an idea. Offcourse you will need a controller, sensors...
the challenge with wheel type 'gravity' (or ether/buoyancy for you in the know FE folks) designs is that any weight dropped from a hair past 12 o'clock to start the rotation, does not have the potential energy to make it past about 11:57 o'clock. if you attach an equal weight at 6 o'clock then start the rotation the kenetic energy released from the 12 o'clock weight will in fact push the 6 o'clock weight up and past 12 o'clock and the wheel may continue to rotate for some time. but on each rotation the bottom weight will suck a little more energy from the top weight until finally they both stop. really, if you cannot make a wheel work with just one weight, you're probably not going to make it work with multiple weights. the key is finding some power source that will suck the weight from 11:57 o'clock to 12:01 o'clock. unfortunately if you try to use magnets to do this they might be able to suck the weight up over 12:01 o'clock but they will not want to release the weight again until around 1 o'clock. so now your rotation is starting a 1 o'clock and will not make it past 10:57 o'clock
What if you use the V shaped magnet mount with the steel plates? Don't the create a pushing force from one side if you line the same poles as the steel plates? Maybe you could use this to keep pushing the wheel just the bit you need to keep it spinning.
For me this experiment starts to become quite unique, so you need something really small to break the barrier and for me it is combination of gravity magnets and science! Please try to use Polyethylene Glicol (Self-Pouring Liquid) instead of water .To do great things you have to think different!
Magnetic attraction/repulsion decrease as the square of the distance, so that's telling you to avoid big swings and arcs. Magnetic power is awesome at short distances. If there was a way to take full advantage of the attraction, generating a lot of velocity, then at the last microsecond, a mechanism would rotate one of the magnets and repel. The mechanism would have to be near friction free. Since F=Ma, no device will work, but it can be made to move a long, long time in a vacuum.
Maybe work… 👉 block water at the middle of L angle ( 01 | 01 ). Note: Ram Pump ( Hydropower ), pumping water higher than its original source without using electricity or any other power source.
I have a suggestion. I don't know if you preform calculations prior to designing your experiments or if you just have an idea and try it out. I might have mentioned that I am a structural engineer or maybe I didn't. I have an BS, MS, and am working on my Ph.D. and have taught at the University of Tennessee for 6 years in the Civil Engineering Department. When I design a building or structure, I have to calculate the forces and strength of every piece and part that compose the building or structure prior to drawing the building. Before I start that process, I already know what the building will look like and I know where every piece and part will be. It is all in my head. I could walk through the entire building in my mind before I have started the first calculation. But, I have to insure that every piece and withstand the loads that it will see during the life of the building. Mechanics states that for each force there is an equal and opposite reaction. That is the basis for structural engineering. So, I have to resolve all of my forces. The sum of the forces in the X-direction must equal 0 or there will be motion in the X-direction. Likewise, the sum of the forces in the Y and Z-directions must also equal 0 or there will be motion in those two directions as well. Additionally, at each joint or connection, I have to check for rotation and sum the moments. The sum of the moments about any point must also equal 0. If they do not equal 0 then I will have rotation about that point. If you have a wheel that has a center, you are trying to create an imbalance. The imbalance is the difference in the sum of the moments about the center of the wheel. Since you are trying to induce rotation about the center, you want to make sure that I every single calculation, you have created a difference in the sum of the moments where the sum is greater on the same side of the wheel in every situation. When you have done this, your wheel will continuously rotate. Then, you should go ahead and produce a mockup of the design.
Most of the research I do is based on magnetic effects. I've spent a great deal of time pouring over the information I've gathered from pioneers of magnetic motive force systems, like Howard Johnson. So I'm much more familiar with them. And I generally build from a picture of something in my mind or experiment on variations of Johnson's research. I actually avoided gravity wheels for a long time because of the precision that is necessary for building them properly. So no, I definitely don't have your expertise for designing something with that type of precision. I've never seen anyone try the types of designs I did in my liquid gravity wheel videos though, so my hope was that if I shared my designs it might help point others into a new direction they may not have thought to try. It may simply be a matter of balancing everything out properly and spacing things exactly the way they need to be. I've made it a habbit to share most of the ideas I have so that others can build upon the things I create, add their own variations, and move things forward in ways that may not have been thought of otherwise.
Probably due to the orientation of the liquid holders, it seems to rotate significantly more from left to right (4:45-4:55) than in the other direction (4:55-5:00), so I would surely stick with that turning direction if I had the chance. By looking at how far the lever goes with the magnetic gate, it seems promising to try a star configuration (two levers at right angles). Thank you and keep up your very inspirational work!
It's designed to work better in one direction, but I wanted to demonstrate that I was testing it every way possible. Good suggestion. If I continued the experiment I'd probably increase the size of the magnets and use a series of gates on the final design. Thanks!
No one ever attempts using a design that incorporates two wheels , one above the other that is connected by a belt or chain , by doing this you could greatly increase the amount of imbalance. the chain or belt would connect to the outside edge of the two wheels so that if you used a design that was 10 ft tall (10 ft between the axles) and the wheels were both 2 ft in diameter you would have a belt or chain that would be apx 26 ft in length. you could mount one of the ( H ) shapes every inch along the 26 ft length of the belt or chain. and the ( H ) shapes could extend from the 1 ft radius to a 3 ft radius from center. this would give you a 3 to 1 weight ratio. so that there would be 312 shapes on either side of the belt at any time 312 would have the water inside the ( H ) shapes located at a distance of 3 ft and 312 would have the water inside the ( H ) shapes located at a distance of 1 ft water weighs 0.0361 lbs per cubic inch so if the ( H ) shapes were 12 inches tall with a center horizontal connector that is 2 ft long and the inside diameter of the pipe was .75 inch then you would have a volume of water inside each ( H ) shape of .44 sq inch x 12 inch = 5.29 cu inch. multiplying by 312 = 1652.21 cu inch multiplying by 0.0361 lbs / cu in = 59.68 lbs the torque on the one side would be 59.68 ft lbs and the torque on the other side would be 3 times that because of the distance from the center. so the torque on the other side would be 178.93 ft lbs. Im not going to claim that this would even work because all of the weights of the water in the ( H ) shapes would be applying a torque or twisting force to the belt or chain vs a downward pull on the top wheel at a 1 ft radius from the center of rotation , the wheel at the top would only feel 59.68 ft lbs downward force or pull on either side because of the water in the pipes. you would need to find a separate way to extract energy from the imbalanced forces. .
How about Aldo Costa's "A machine to die for" (Paris, Ferris wheel). The 256 (empty) wine bottles (mounted near the perimeter=circumference) are each flipped (=rotated) "up" (by 1 lever, of 2) at "only" the top & bottom of the ferris wheel. Thus only 2 bottles are moved (up) at a time. Each bottle is mounted on a pivot_assembly (not really ball_bearings) so (that) they "stay (put)", maintaining the same angle (for giving its effective (torque's) radius length) due to (the pivot's) "friction" (til each bottle arrives at either the top or bottom of the ferris wheel. Long (thin) lever rods (=bars), are used (1 for each bottle, to pivot the bottle in(wards)=smaller radius) (only) at the bottom of the Ferris wheel. Some sort of a stub mounted near the top of the stand (=framework), pivots each bottle (up, =out=larger radius) near the top of the Ferris wheel, while the wheel rotates. 128 bottles (=half the total number of bottles) always have a larger radius (than the rest of them (=the other 128 bottles). e.g. left side versus right side of the ferris wheel (or visa versa, from my memory). It's that simple! Why not concentrate on a design (like that) that works, before mixing 2 unknown techniques together? Redundancy breeds success. It's a "push_up" effect (~a few centimeters), only at top & bottom, while rotating. The major trick is the correct amount of friction (to make each bottle keep its pivoted angle). Think of the wheel, (very ruffly) as a mushroom (slice), with the axle thru where the head joins the stem. The stem's length is less than the head's radius & the mushroom lies horizontally (stem is left, & head is right side) (instead of growing vertical). The (mushroom's large round=semi_circle) head (right side) represents the larger radius for 128 bottles (half of the wheel), & the (small) stem_end (left side) represents the smaller radius for the other 128 bottles (half of the wheel). The mushroom slice turns clockwise, because the right side has more torque (larger radius), than the left side (smaller radius). But that('s a magic) mushroom (that) adjusts (up, vertically, along the large diameter) to maintain its horizontal form=shape.
The principle of the water wheel has to do with moment. This arrangement does not give you an advantage when the water displaces. It is too close to the center of the arm and will not produce a moment. It is just producing an axial force along the arm. The center of gravity of the water when it moves downward must induce moment. This induction has to occur when the wheel is at the top of the arm and aligned with the arm. When the wheel is horizontal, the arm itself provides the moment. I was thinking about the magnets and shielding. You had mentioned in one of the other videos about the motors that had been constructed and did not work because of inadequate or no shielding. I would agree with you and take it one step further. Imagine that you have a shotgun and an you shoot it at wall, but you only want to hit one single item. What could you do? You can buy a choke for you shotgun and it will tighten the spread. Or you could change your ammunition from shot to a slug round. If you shot the wall with a slug, you are guaranteed to only hit exactly one item. You only have one round. The same should apply to magnets. If you have a magnet array that is throwing out Gaussian Flux in every which way how can you predict it? You can't, you have a shotgun. You can shield it so that it is like a laser beam. If you were to completely shield either your force magnets or your car so that the car can only take input due to it being shielded or the force magnets being shielded, you will only get force in the amount and direction that you desire.
Motionmagnetics cool video! But the first rotary magnet motor you presented in this video, can be successful, if the magnet arc is rotated 90 degrees and has a few gates to pass trough, like the pmm4ghybrid replica of the Liniair HoJo motor, with the magnets closer and closer together and than further apart and closer and closer, asymmetrical, that’s easier to convert in to rotary motion. The gravity wheel will always have to have a external factor besides gravity, because gravity goes one way, you have to have compensation
Thanks. I've tried linear versions of it that were set up that way. Haven't managed to get it to work yet. If I were to continue working on the last design I would add more gates to try and bring the rotor up to the point where gravity would take over and bring it back into the first gate.
Motionmagnetics yessssss!!!! Look: www.google.nl/amp/s/www.technologyreview.com/s/424843/how-to-build-an-antimagnet/amp/ This is another solution to the equilibrium-problem! I prefer HoJo’s structures, as the solution, but this is also amazing 😉
i might nat b fit to give a commet ba i thk its better to add some rotary motion on z 2 water filled pipes coz it decreases the back drag that you support by ur hand, thx fo sharing ur amazing ideas
What if the magnets at the end of linear motor would be themselves moving back and forth, takes less energy to move lighter objects and this movement would create the "disturbance" needed to move much heavier center magnet? It should only move a short, variable distance back and forth in a coiled tube.. :D
I would like to see you build one that uses a ( H ) shape vs a ( L ) or ( S ) shape. the reason is that with a ( L ) or ( S ) shape all of the water is not located at the same distance from the center of rotation and with a ( H ) shape it would be. Im not going to claim that using an ( H ) shape will deliver better results though.
dude get into arduino - try to use servos and solenoids to move or pivot magnetic fields on a HoJo or better yet your own setup in order to bypass the 1 inch barrier.. 90% static, 10% moving parts easily done with basic electronic components. if i wasnt so stupid i would do it but YOU probably can! peace
you want to know the secret that allows stuff to work? in order to produce a net force, two force must cancel each other out in order to restart the third reacting with the second. energy balance out because nothing cancel out the force that created the potential difference in the first place. energy is a system that always comes in pairs of opposite potential. one must be canceled out for the other to continue produce force at a distance. the matrix alway try to bance the equation. the reason why infinte energy can exist is because we do not live in base reality. if we did, no such thing would work.
I have an important question (unfortunatelly the autor of the video seems not to replay to anyone). I have designed a system (only on paper yet, but 5 years thinking on this now) that is somewhat the same path you are taking. I believe i have found the solution you are looking for to make your prototype to work. Having said that... what you will do if you really make this project work? are you going to post a video explaining everything and giving it for free? I am not sure if the patent system would be enough to secure a discovery of that magnetude.
What If you used some open source A.I. code and had some machine learning take a look at your schematics and come up with the changes needed to achomplish this? It seems hopeful that it would come up with a working solution
Motionmagnetics but yoir interesting I understand don't give up tho there is more to this world than govement and the oil barons tell us think the off griders burn wood to keep warm in alaska look at sterling engine stick that at the back of fire and bingo free electric well if the wood is free and bears dint eat you lol good luck and God bless
Thanks for reply I hope you don't have to long a break I to built a free energy machine ran for 3 days mine was magnets I just needed help with zena diodes but most thought I was nuts your idea is great what about fill with mercury, magnets float on the stuff. ( Google tesla 369) the man was genius or he had ADHD with a splash of aspergers
Well, now you have added magnets, you have well and truly joined the cult of idiots who believe magnets have magic properties that will give them perpetual motion and free energy if only they can align them properly. This is pure folly, as the laws of motion and thermodynamics will prevail every time. I have to give you credit for persistence, though.
Two methods of making energy are readily available to us, a two radius Atwood’s machine and the ‘cylinder and spheres’.
An Atwood’s is simply a pulley; but the pulley can have two radii. But the drive radius can be much smaller than the radius of the pulley where the balanced mass is accelerated. The extra mass (100 g) or ‘drive mass’ can have a radius at 1 cm and the accelerated mass (200 g) at 10 cm. The energy increase is extremely large and is related to this radius difference.
An Atwood’s can accelerate 200 grams at the 10 cm radius just as easily as it accelerates 2000 g at the 1 cm radius. But the energy is 10 times as much. ½ * 2 kg *1 m/sec * 1 m/sec = 1 J ½ * .2 kg * 10 m/sec * 10 m/sec = 10 J
The ‘cylinder and sphere’ transfers the motion of a large mass to a small mass and gives you a huge increase in energy.
Making these experiment would give us free energy.
I wanted to test the idea of gravity plus magnetic force. Am glad to see somebody is working on it. There is another thing you can add to the setup but I can't give you a clue because I want to do it by myself. Keep doing the great things.
Passaram-se 4 anos. E agora? A pista deu certo?
I like your common sense approach to this subject. Very enjoyable. Thanks for sharing your efforts.
The only "help" I can tell you try an even number of arms like 5 or 7 then other than the moment each arm passes the poles there is imbalance having one more arm always on that side, so with 5 arms there is 3 arms on one side vs 2 arms on the other, with 7 arms you get 4 to 3 arms. Anyway just a thought.
This is something I've been working on for a very long time. I had a slightly different approach in that I was basing my idea on keeping the centre off centre on a permanent basis. My biggest problem was a lack off proper equipment to make the components properly. I was using weights on shafts that were guided by an off centre guiding channel. I made a couple of the engines without success but maybe I'll try again sometime. I know it can work. I did think of the use of liquid but in curved tubes, in my head it works
O líquido, tem vários defeitos. É lento e nunca está, onde se precisa. Pense em pequenas esferas.
Good on you mate, you're keeping at it with the same enthusiasm that was evident in your older videos. Fantastic to see such a never-say-die attitude in combination with your extensive background and your willingness to embrace new technology to produce new ideas. You are the perfect example of scientific endeavour, personified, and I take my hat off to you.
Only problem is, gravity is just as balanced as those gates your trying to get thru. It's great that you are experimenting and trying to figure it out! Keeps our minds alive!
Nice concept, combinations of magnetic and perpetuum
Fantastic work!
Questions/ideas..
Are you familiar with Bhãskara’s wheel design? I’d imagine it would give a better balance to weight distribution?
Could a liquid such as gallium, Mercury or ferro fluids be beneficial? With or with out added magnet..
gravitational/mag gate influence is definitely an exciting addition to such a design.
Thank you for sharing your experiments, it’s great to see someone trying such ideas and showing the progression.
Heh, you put in this video what I had been thinking about - using both gravity and magnets together. Nice work.
His building project including 3D printing all these stuff ,was 10000 times way more cooler then the end result.
Hi,
I really like where you are going with the gravity x mag gates.
Is there a part 4?
Thanks
Bro, as your new fan and sub I ask...no I demand you ignore haters.....just keep going....one day I'll explain why it took me 27 years to complete my project....I competed against the biggest companies you know today....and in the end I did it.....and sold and signed my voice away to ever speak about it... but they can never quiet my passion and help I give to elderly and homeless and sick and handicap and on.....you do your thing.....I am going to to watch from here as of now....best!! 😎
I really like your videos and the way you present the subject. I'd like to see your take on Lasersabre's low power motors.
Great efforts in both the hydro mechanics and magnetic and also the combination of the two.
I liked your two sentences describing the 3D printing. The description was better than the dedicated videos on the matter.
As a thank you, I hope that you consider my suggestion of placing several water wheels on the same axis but offset in an angle that the wheels cover the dead zones of each other, the more wheels you use the more stability and speed the wheels would gain.
The same principle can be used for magnet wheels.
Very Clever
thank that was a great video and you just saved me some time. on a design I had already started. I still think the best way is to transfer the water all the way down to the opposite end. Never thought about an air tube to help with transfer though.
An honest observation:
Whatever you "gain" on the DOWNWARD side of the device (ie - the side which can use gravity) MUST be FULLY gained (and then some) on the UPWARD side of the device (ie - the side which must FIGHT the force of gravity) - in order to create even a single full rotation.
Example:
Try bouncing any kind of ball, from any height (say 6 feet for example). See if the ball ever bounces back to a height of 6 feet - or over. To be blunt, this is the EXACT same problem you are experiencing with this device. Just saying...
Good to read your comment.... question if I may....how about using a rechargeable battery that gives a push on the up and charges on the movement??
The "Principled Asymmetry" is a device in a similar classification--lateral support/ over-unity theory which, although not yet proven perpetual, was designed to use support from the fulcrum to reduce the resistance of throwing a weight downward--may have applications should be searchable under 'Coppedge'.
Love your channel. I'd try doubling your arms on that design, as the useful force of each thing- the water drop and the magnetic pull (or push, whichever way you've got that going) that seems spent before the next drop or pull is due to take place. I'd also try moving the gates, so the pull of one, helps drop the water, which will get the next magnet into the gate. I'm sure I'm a student saying dumb shit to the master here, but that's what I see. It's that one inch sort of problem, in both systems. there's gotta be a spot to play those off of each other at the right time.
Dunno man, but I like where you're going with this. keep it up.
You are doing amazing work, hats off to you! I totally agree that there must be a solution combining different engineering principles, personally I think there is not enough consideration in regard to 3 dimensional applications i.e spherical magnetic arrangements, everything ive seen is linear or 2d. Good luck!
your work is inspirational thanks
A suggestion, change the axis, each arm with a independent axis tha that shift the center of weight at lower point, would need some gears, the liquid don't move fast enough but maybe using gears you can make the two opposing arms change positions
Something like that ua-cam.com/video/-42Z-_Kq0QU/v-deo.html
Hi Sunshine, take a look at Viktor Schauberger "The Water Wizard" a more efficient way to transfer the water threw your pipe it may help you with a better design. May you enjoy peace an prosperity, while you manifest all the necessary Love an Light of Life!
Thanks. I have looked at some of his work, but I haven't implemented any of it into my designs as of yet. Thanks for the comment. Be blessed and do great things!
@@Motionmagnetics In mixing water and magnets, have you tried to use eletromagnet switched on only few instants per cycle (there must be a specific instant)? Maybe one on the bottom and other on the top, fixed... I know the objective is to get autonomous movement. However, you can think that in a car engine the electrical system generates the sparks to burn fuel.. Just an idea. Offcourse you will need a controller, sensors...
the challenge with wheel type 'gravity' (or ether/buoyancy for you in the know FE folks) designs is that any weight dropped from a hair past 12 o'clock to start the rotation, does not have the potential energy to make it past about 11:57 o'clock. if you attach an equal weight at 6 o'clock then start the rotation the kenetic energy released from the 12 o'clock weight will in fact push the 6 o'clock weight up and past 12 o'clock and the wheel may continue to rotate for some time. but on each rotation the bottom weight will suck a little more energy from the top weight until finally they both stop. really, if you cannot make a wheel work with just one weight, you're probably not going to make it work with multiple weights. the key is finding some power source that will suck the weight from 11:57 o'clock to 12:01 o'clock. unfortunately if you try to use magnets to do this they might be able to suck the weight up over 12:01 o'clock but they will not want to release the weight again until around 1 o'clock. so now your rotation is starting a 1 o'clock and will not make it past 10:57 o'clock
What if you use the V shaped magnet mount with the steel plates? Don't the create a pushing force from one side if you line the same poles as the steel plates? Maybe you could use this to keep pushing the wheel just the bit you need to keep it spinning.
For me this experiment starts to become quite unique, so you need something really small to break the barrier and for me it is combination of gravity magnets and science! Please try to use Polyethylene Glicol (Self-Pouring Liquid) instead of water .To do great things you have to think different!
Thank you. Thinking different is definitely the key. I'll look into that.
Классные эксперименты!
благодаря!
Magnetic attraction/repulsion decrease as the square of the distance, so that's telling you to avoid big swings and arcs. Magnetic power is awesome at short distances. If there was a way to take full advantage of the attraction, generating a lot of velocity, then at the last microsecond, a mechanism would rotate one of the magnets and repel. The mechanism would have to be near friction free. Since F=Ma, no device will work, but it can be made to move a long, long time in a vacuum.
I like where you're going with the rotation.
With a N\N "gate" and a S|N on the swingbar:
Sort of like N\N
deep respect...
Thanks.
Maybe work… 👉 block water at the middle of L angle ( 01 | 01 ).
Note: Ram Pump ( Hydropower ), pumping water higher than its original source without using electricity or any other power source.
That's not a bad idea.
I have a suggestion. I don't know if you preform calculations prior to designing your experiments or if you just have an idea and try it out. I might have mentioned that I am a structural engineer or maybe I didn't. I have an BS, MS, and am working on my Ph.D. and have taught at the University of Tennessee for 6 years in the Civil Engineering Department. When I design a building or structure, I have to calculate the forces and strength of every piece and part that compose the building or structure prior to drawing the building. Before I start that process, I already know what the building will look like and I know where every piece and part will be. It is all in my head. I could walk through the entire building in my mind before I have started the first calculation. But, I have to insure that every piece and withstand the loads that it will see during the life of the building. Mechanics states that for each force there is an equal and opposite reaction. That is the basis for structural engineering. So, I have to resolve all of my forces. The sum of the forces in the X-direction must equal 0 or there will be motion in the X-direction. Likewise, the sum of the forces in the Y and Z-directions must also equal 0 or there will be motion in those two directions as well. Additionally, at each joint or connection, I have to check for rotation and sum the moments. The sum of the moments about any point must also equal 0. If they do not equal 0 then I will have rotation about that point. If you have a wheel that has a center, you are trying to create an imbalance. The imbalance is the difference in the sum of the moments about the center of the wheel. Since you are trying to induce rotation about the center, you want to make sure that I every single calculation, you have created a difference in the sum of the moments where the sum is greater on the same side of the wheel in every situation. When you have done this, your wheel will continuously rotate. Then, you should go ahead and produce a mockup of the design.
Most of the research I do is based on magnetic effects. I've spent a great deal of time pouring over the information I've gathered from pioneers of magnetic motive force systems, like Howard Johnson. So I'm much more familiar with them. And I generally build from a picture of something in my mind or experiment on variations of Johnson's research. I actually avoided gravity wheels for a long time because of the precision that is necessary for building them properly. So no, I definitely don't have your expertise for designing something with that type of precision. I've never seen anyone try the types of designs I did in my liquid gravity wheel videos though, so my hope was that if I shared my designs it might help point others into a new direction they may not have thought to try. It may simply be a matter of balancing everything out properly and spacing things exactly the way they need to be. I've made it a habbit to share most of the ideas I have so that others can build upon the things I create, add their own variations, and move things forward in ways that may not have been thought of otherwise.
Probably due to the orientation of the liquid holders, it seems to rotate significantly more from left to right (4:45-4:55) than in the other direction (4:55-5:00), so I would surely stick with that turning direction if I had the chance. By looking at how far the lever goes with the magnetic gate, it seems promising to try a star configuration (two levers at right angles). Thank you and keep up your very inspirational work!
It's designed to work better in one direction, but I wanted to demonstrate that I was testing it every way possible. Good suggestion. If I continued the experiment I'd probably increase the size of the magnets and use a series of gates on the final design. Thanks!
No one ever attempts using a design that incorporates two wheels , one above the other
that is connected by a belt or chain , by doing this you could greatly increase the amount of
imbalance.
the chain or belt would connect to the outside edge of the two wheels so that
if you used a design that was 10 ft tall (10 ft between the axles) and the wheels
were both 2 ft in diameter you would have a belt or chain that would be apx 26 ft in
length.
you could mount one of the ( H ) shapes every inch along the 26 ft length of the belt or chain.
and the ( H ) shapes could extend from the 1 ft radius to a 3 ft radius from center.
this would give you a 3 to 1 weight ratio.
so that there would be 312 shapes on either side of the belt at any time
312 would have the water inside the ( H ) shapes located at a distance of 3 ft
and
312 would have the water inside the ( H ) shapes located at a distance of 1 ft
water weighs 0.0361 lbs per cubic inch so if the ( H ) shapes were 12 inches tall
with a center horizontal connector that is 2 ft long and the inside diameter of the
pipe was .75 inch then you would have a volume of water inside each ( H ) shape
of .44 sq inch x 12 inch = 5.29 cu inch.
multiplying by 312 = 1652.21 cu inch
multiplying by 0.0361 lbs / cu in = 59.68 lbs
the torque on the one side would be 59.68 ft lbs
and the torque on the other side would be 3 times that because of the distance
from the center.
so the torque on the other side would be 178.93 ft lbs.
Im not going to claim that this would even work because all of the weights of the water in the ( H ) shapes would be applying a torque or twisting force to the belt or chain vs a downward pull on the top wheel at a 1 ft radius from the center of rotation , the wheel at
the top would only feel 59.68 ft lbs downward force or pull on either side
because of the water in the pipes.
you would need to find a separate way to extract energy from the imbalanced forces.
.
How about Aldo Costa's "A machine to die for" (Paris, Ferris wheel). The 256 (empty) wine bottles (mounted near the perimeter=circumference) are each flipped (=rotated) "up" (by 1 lever, of 2) at "only" the top & bottom of the ferris wheel. Thus only 2 bottles are moved (up) at a time. Each bottle is mounted on a pivot_assembly (not really ball_bearings) so (that) they "stay (put)", maintaining the same angle (for giving its effective (torque's) radius length) due to (the pivot's) "friction"
(til each bottle arrives at either the top or bottom of the ferris wheel. Long (thin) lever rods (=bars), are used (1 for each bottle, to pivot the bottle in(wards)=smaller radius)
(only) at the bottom of the Ferris wheel. Some sort of a stub mounted near the top of the stand (=framework), pivots each bottle (up, =out=larger radius) near the top of the Ferris wheel, while the wheel rotates. 128 bottles (=half the total number of bottles) always have a larger radius (than the rest of them (=the other 128 bottles). e.g. left side versus right side of the ferris wheel (or visa versa, from my memory). It's that simple! Why not concentrate on a design (like that) that works, before mixing 2 unknown techniques together? Redundancy breeds success. It's a "push_up" effect (~a few centimeters), only at top & bottom, while rotating. The major trick is the correct amount of friction (to make each bottle keep its pivoted angle).
Think of the wheel, (very ruffly) as a mushroom (slice),
with the axle thru where the head joins the stem.
The stem's length is less than the head's radius
& the mushroom lies horizontally (stem is left, & head is right side)
(instead of growing vertical).
The (mushroom's large round=semi_circle) head (right side) represents the larger radius for 128 bottles (half of the wheel),
& the (small) stem_end (left side) represents the smaller radius for the other 128 bottles (half of the wheel).
The mushroom slice turns clockwise,
because the right side has more torque (larger radius),
than the left side (smaller radius).
But that('s a magic) mushroom (that) adjusts (up, vertically, along the large diameter)
to maintain its horizontal form=shape.
The principle of the water wheel has to do with moment. This arrangement does not give you an advantage when the water displaces. It is too close to the center of the arm and will not produce a moment. It is just producing an axial force along the arm. The center of gravity of the water when it moves downward must induce moment. This induction has to occur when the wheel is at the top of the arm and aligned with the arm. When the wheel is horizontal, the arm itself provides the moment. I was thinking about the magnets and shielding. You had mentioned in one of the other videos about the motors that had been constructed and did not work because of inadequate or no shielding. I would agree with you and take it one step further. Imagine that you have a shotgun and an you shoot it at wall, but you only want to hit one single item. What could you do? You can buy a choke for you shotgun and it will tighten the spread. Or you could change your ammunition from shot to a slug round. If you shot the wall with a slug, you are guaranteed to only hit exactly one item. You only have one round. The same should apply to magnets. If you have a magnet array that is throwing out Gaussian Flux in every which way how can you predict it? You can't, you have a shotgun. You can shield it so that it is like a laser beam. If you were to completely shield either your force magnets or your car so that the car can only take input due to it being shielded or the force magnets being shielded, you will only get force in the amount and direction that you desire.
Motionmagnetics cool video! But the first rotary magnet motor you presented in this video, can be successful, if the magnet arc is rotated 90 degrees and has a few gates to pass trough, like the pmm4ghybrid replica of the Liniair HoJo motor, with the magnets closer and closer together and than further apart and closer and closer, asymmetrical, that’s easier to convert in to rotary motion.
The gravity wheel will always have to have a external factor besides gravity, because gravity goes one way, you have to have compensation
Thanks. I've tried linear versions of it that were set up that way. Haven't managed to get it to work yet. If I were to continue working on the last design I would add more gates to try and bring the rotor up to the point where gravity would take over and bring it back into the first gate.
Motionmagnetics please don’t give up magnet rotors, these are the future... you can make them more efficient, I believe in you
Thank you. I'm working on a new magnetic motor design right now actually.
Motionmagnetics yessssss!!!!
Look: www.google.nl/amp/s/www.technologyreview.com/s/424843/how-to-build-an-antimagnet/amp/
This is another solution to the equilibrium-problem! I prefer HoJo’s structures, as the solution, but this is also amazing 😉
i might nat b fit to give a commet ba i thk its better to add some rotary motion on z 2 water filled pipes coz it decreases the back drag that you support by ur hand, thx fo sharing ur amazing ideas
I swear, when I get a job. Il’l get a 3d printer.
If it doesn't self-rotate how can it be a "step in the right direction" - its not working at all.
Number 3 finally did it for me! This problem has tormented me for 20 years. Would a flywheel assist the rotation. John from Oz
Everytime i see those magnet motors stops spinning in his video’s i get so pissed off.
Make 4 hybrids of the magnetic and gravity arms. Combining the two forces. Good luck.
what if the gates arent at the bottom but on the 4 sides forming an outer square?
Hello sir ,
Is it possible to rotate it by putting bearing at the center .
Water movment is to slow for this to work with the speed magnet push. so energy is lost through time difference.
What if you put the magnets closer to the water cartridges and then added more cartridges and magnets there by keeping it turning.
What if you made the support rods collapse on the upper side of the device?
What if the magnets at the end of linear motor would be themselves moving back and forth, takes less energy to move lighter objects and this movement would create the "disturbance" needed to move much heavier center magnet? It should only move a short, variable distance back and forth in a coiled tube.. :D
I would like to see you build one that uses a ( H ) shape vs a ( L ) or ( S ) shape.
the reason is that with a ( L ) or ( S ) shape all of the water is not located at the same
distance from the center of rotation and with a ( H ) shape it would be.
Im not going to claim that using an ( H ) shape will deliver better results though.
If you are looking for inspiration check out Bhaskara's Wheel. Hope to see you glean energy from the system and generate power.
cool
try to adjust the angle about 45degrees of the inener elbow migth speed up the water to flow to the front,cylinder.
dude get into arduino - try to use servos and solenoids to move or pivot magnetic fields on a HoJo or better yet your own setup in order to bypass the 1 inch barrier.. 90% static, 10% moving parts easily done with basic electronic components. if i wasnt so stupid i would do it but YOU probably can! peace
Like. Try yo use little impact every time to change balance greatly.
I'm not saying it can not be done but it sounds like your just using water and magnets to make a perpetual motion machine.
Ever thought of meshing a magnetic sligshot and the magnet wheel?
you want to know the secret that allows stuff to work? in order to produce a net force, two force must cancel each other out in order to restart the third reacting with the second. energy balance out because nothing cancel out the force that created the potential difference in the first place. energy is a system that always comes in pairs of opposite potential. one must be canceled out for the other to continue produce force at a distance. the matrix alway try to bance the equation. the reason why infinte energy can exist is because we do not live in base reality. if we did, no such thing would work.
I have an important question (unfortunatelly the autor of the video seems not to replay to anyone).
I have designed a system (only on paper yet, but 5 years thinking on this now) that is somewhat the same path you are taking. I believe i have found the solution you are looking for to make your prototype to work. Having said that... what you will do if you really make this project work? are you going to post a video explaining everything and giving it for free? I am not sure if the patent system would be enough to secure a discovery of that magnetude.
Infinity rotation
Maybe work 👉 Leonardo da Vinci’s wheel with water… not with metal sphere.
I do enjoy the design of his wheel.
perhaps a solenoid powered by atmospheric electricity to kick is off center
I love you brother
What If you used some open source A.I. code and had some machine learning take a look at your schematics and come up with the changes needed to achomplish this? It seems hopeful that it would come up with a working solution
If I had access to an A.I. capable of that I'd certainly give it a try. Thanks for the comment.
Interesting.
Thanks.
Can you put the magnet higher?
Your problem is that: - so smal (little) amount of water cannot to move so big and heavy mechanism.
continue with this work.
i believe in to you.
the gravitational power take more influence in the system because of the mace of objects?
L=liquid M= magnets
try 4 L 4 M or 5 L 5 M
2 L 2 M is not enough
Milking stool, tractor linkage 3 point contact try three pipes and 2 or 4 magnets
Thanks. I'm probably going to take a break from gravity wheels for a time, as this is my fourth video on them.
Motionmagnetics but yoir interesting I understand don't give up tho there is more to this world than govement and the oil barons tell us think the off griders burn wood to keep warm in alaska look at sterling engine stick that at the back of fire and bingo free electric well if the wood is free and bears dint eat you lol good luck and God bless
Thank you sir. God bless you as well.
Thanks for reply I hope you don't have to long a break I to built a free energy machine ran for 3 days mine was magnets I just needed help with zena diodes but most thought I was nuts your idea is great what about fill with mercury, magnets float on the stuff. ( Google tesla 369) the man was genius or he had ADHD with a splash of aspergers
magnets, springs, momentum, electric solenoids to facilitate your unbalanced position. forget about the water, it moves too slow.
use your gravity put the magnets above
Isn't there are mathimatic solution to prove this as impossible?
Hey I've built a perpetual motion machine out of Legos about a month ago and it's still going ps there are also marbles
A cool project but it sadly did mot wprk,ouch.
you need odd number of arms like most windmill props
Este es un pequeño paso para mi canal.....pero un gran paso para los Subscriptores...
You're on false road.
The centre of your mind Isn't same
You must find the Center recipes
FR
Try using Mercury instead of water....
Nicola Tesla sayd the key is 3,6,9....
ROTATION ONLY FROM HAND !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Muito inocente... Faltando conhecimento sobre atuação dos campos magnéticos
WHERE IS LIQ ??? 99% IS ABOUT MAG...???!!!
Check out Veproject1, perpetual motion machines, compilation of ideas, on youtube. Only six minutes, but very interesting.
PEDIRAST!
How much is spent on these lies!!!!
Well, now you have added magnets, you have well and truly joined the cult of idiots who believe magnets have magic properties that will give them perpetual motion and free energy if only they can align them properly. This is pure folly, as the laws of motion and thermodynamics will prevail every time. I have to give you credit for persistence, though.
The "laws" of thermodynamics are man made policies. Not actual law.
There is a cult of idiots not yet aware that there are two versions of science: 1. Public consumption. 2. Actual science hidden from the public.
Never ever going to work