BMW Showdown: 2001 BMW 530d 193HP vs. 2019 BMW 520d 190HP - Acceleration Test 0-100 & 0-200 km/h"

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 гру 2019
  • Join us for a unique BMW showdown as we test the acceleration capabilities of the classic 2001 BMW 530d, featuring a robust 193 horsepower, against the modern 2019 BMW 520d, equipped with 190 horsepower. Explore the evolution of BMW's engineering prowess and discover how these two generations of the 5 Series stack up in our comprehensive acceleration test, measuring their 0-100 km/h and 0-200 km/h capabilities. Let's dive into this thrilling comparison of BMW's past and present performance!"
    "My channel Evolution Speed is all about the thrilling world of drag racing. We dive headfirst into the adrenaline-pumping action of high-speed drag races, featuring powerful and customized vehicles that roar down the track. Join us for a front-row seat to witness the heart-pounding excitement, as we cover drag racing events, showcase top-notch drivers and their incredible machines, and provide in-depth analysis of race strategies and performance enhancements. Whether you're a die-hard drag racing enthusiast or just looking for an exciting motorsport experience, our channel has something for everyone. Get ready to experience the sheer power and speed of drag racing like never before!
    So Guys in this video i'm showing you : www.evolutionspeed.xyz
    :www.worldinfphone.website
    2001 BMW 530d 193HP vs 2019 BMW 520d 190 HP old one VS new one
    Previous Video : • BMW G30 520d 190 hp vs...
    **** sured by BMW since 1972. It is the successor to the New Class Sedans and is currently in its seventh generation.
    Initially, the 5 Series was only available in a sedan body style. The wagon/estate body style (called "Touring") was added in 1991 and the 5-door fastback (called "Gran Turismo") was produced from 2009 to 2017.
    The first generation of 5 Series was powered by naturally aspirated four-cylinder and six-cylinder petrol engines. Following generations have been powered by four-cylinder, six-cylinder, V8 and V10 engines that are either naturally aspirated or turbocharged. Since 1982, diesel engines have been included in the 5 Series range.
    The 5 Series is BMW's second best-selling model after the 3 Series.[1] On January 29, 2008, the 5 millionth 5 Series was manufactured, a 530d sedan in Carbon Black Metallic.[2]
    BMW's three-digit model naming convention began with the first 5 Series,[3] thus the 5 Series was BMW's first model line to use "Series" in the name.
    #BMWShowdown, #BMW5Series, #AccelerationTest, #ClassicBMW, #ModernBMW, #CarComparison, #BMWPerformance, #BMWEngineering, #AutomotiveEvolution, #CarTech, #CarEnthusiasts, #AutoReview, #BMW530d, #BMW520d, #SpeedTest, #AutomotiveComparison, #CarAcceleration, #CarSpecs, #CarPerformance, #GermanEngineering, #CarCulture, #LuxuryCars, #TurbochargedEngines, #DieselEngine, #BMWTechnology, #AutomotiveHeritage, #ClassicCarReview, #CarHistory, #BMWDesign, #AutomotiveInnovation, #CarTechComparison, #VintageBMW, #ModernPerformance, #HighSpeedAction, #CarPerformanceTest, #CarEnthusiasts, #AutoTech, #AutomotiveExcellence, #AutomotiveLegacy, #BMW5SeriesComparison, #AutomotiveAdvancements, #CarLegacy, #GermanCarEngineering.
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 290

  • @laurooon1777
    @laurooon1777 4 роки тому +451

    530D 2001 = 300.000km without problems. BMW 520D 2019 = 120.000km Engine Failure.

    • @evolutionspeed
      @evolutionspeed  4 роки тому +11

      😁

    • @raducirstea5011
      @raducirstea5011 4 роки тому +38

      Or timing chain probblems

    • @seskenas
      @seskenas 3 роки тому +8

      laurooon 1 u believe 1 year old car has 120k and 19 y.o. 530d has 300k ?

    • @BruceWayne-ey1mr
      @BruceWayne-ey1mr 3 роки тому +1

      @@seskenas
      I think you listening the other channel

    • @peterzingler6221
      @peterzingler6221 3 роки тому +1

      @@seskenas totally possible

  • @hisa8620
    @hisa8620 4 роки тому +442

    6 cylindres rules even with 20 years old more

  • @dimitarthe_bulgarian7175
    @dimitarthe_bulgarian7175 4 роки тому +88

    20 years older but not giving up, even peferable

    • @droland1978
      @droland1978 3 роки тому +6

      20 years old with +2 cylinder and more co2 and more smoke.

    • @srbinsrpski
      @srbinsrpski 3 роки тому +17

      Fuck off with ecological norms

    • @trooperodst6880
      @trooperodst6880 3 роки тому +4

      E39 is legendary forever

  • @Decrepit_biker
    @Decrepit_biker 3 роки тому +35

    Am I the only one who hates the fact that the speedo on the 2019 car isn't linear?

    • @MM-wp5sp
      @MM-wp5sp 3 роки тому

      It looks like c*ap. Pretty much in linw with BMW quakity these days, tho.

    • @an0nim11
      @an0nim11 Рік тому

      Yeah the e39 tacho scale rpm to speed relation was just perfect.

  • @rafaellra8169
    @rafaellra8169 4 роки тому +68

    530 D M57 😊

  • @deepforezt
    @deepforezt 3 роки тому +27

    Older BMW's were built for men and last forever. Newer one's are eye candy. No substance in it. Built for facebook and instagrammers.

    • @handofmud144
      @handofmud144 3 роки тому +1

      Well spoken, bro! ☺👍

    • @Manakuski
      @Manakuski 3 роки тому

      Completely false assumption. You clearly have no idea what you're talking about.

  • @Shuffler131
    @Shuffler131 3 роки тому +105

    Give the old 530d new transmission and it will laugh at the new car. That makes all the difference.

    • @Shuffler131
      @Shuffler131 3 роки тому +1

      @@ij2759 sure, the power delivery of the bigger engine is wastly better, but the gearbox makes the difference here as both engines are practically same as far as power output is.

    • @madmax3397
      @madmax3397 3 роки тому +1

      lighter rims better tires

    • @heavyweight6440
      @heavyweight6440 3 роки тому

      Bullshit. 190hp is 190hp... You cant do more work in the same time if the figures say 190hp...

    • @misobezdan5217
      @misobezdan5217 3 роки тому

      @@heavyweight6440 Do you know the term "powerloss"?

    • @heavyweight6440
      @heavyweight6440 3 роки тому +1

      @@misobezdan5217 Yeah so? You could change the oil of the AT-transmission, but that wont give you more power. It will maybe give you faster shift timings but thats it.
      The differences in gearboxes is way more important than its age. The gearbox in the 530d is a 5 speed AT gearbox and the 520d has a 8 speed AT gearbox. Even IF you would change the gearbox of the 530d it wont produce more power... also the 530d as 10Nm more Torque AND 3hp more (which is important for high speeds). Depending on equipment the 520d might be slightly heavier...
      We dont even know how many kilometers both engine have run... only because the 530d is almost 20 years old, it doesnt necessarily mean that it has run more than 200.000km. It can even be less than 150.000km so there isnt really powerloss.
      So in the end - the results are fine and compareable. It has nothing to do with powerloss, lol.

  • @fabiusmaximuscunctator7390
    @fabiusmaximuscunctator7390 3 роки тому +4

    e39 is the most beautiful BMW ever to exist. This the car BMW reached their peak in terms of design and style.

    • @rasmus123f
      @rasmus123f 3 роки тому +1

      Im sorry but I strongly dissagree.
      The e46 was the upmost beatifull car to date. If we talk 5 series its the e34

  • @koni9741
    @koni9741 3 роки тому +15

    Boost 530d 1.35bar
    Boost 520d 2.00bar

  • @fedjadrndarski5606
    @fedjadrndarski5606 4 роки тому +109

    Old 3.0 is faster, new 2.0 is quicker from the line, but old is much tougher and can be tuned easily with bigger turbo and better pump. There is no replacement for displacement.

    • @Hellafast2uDude
      @Hellafast2uDude 3 роки тому +6

      Its all about 5-gearbox vs 8-gearbox

    • @3216ben1
      @3216ben1 3 роки тому +2

      Also old 3.0 can survive chip tune, bigger turbo, injectors etc for years, new 2.0 dies early being stock, it's sad to see how bad the durability is on new cars

    • @fedjadrndarski5606
      @fedjadrndarski5606 3 роки тому

      @@3216ben1 100%

    • @miked5789
      @miked5789 3 роки тому +1

      Mine(M57N, e46) has 340k km, still pulls hard after 15yrs of spirited driving, and delivers killer economy 7L/100km +/-.

    • @3216ben1
      @3216ben1 3 роки тому

      @@miked5789 Mine has 316k on odometer, probably tinkered tho, fixed intercooler leak and got chiptuned, goes like rocket, no matter how hard I drive it, average stays at 9L/100km, it's automatic too (probably shittiest automatic ever so it'll probably grenade soon xD)

  • @sadikgunlu3858
    @sadikgunlu3858 4 роки тому +29

    E39 M57 530d 193 HP💯💪❤️

  • @dsd6538
    @dsd6538 4 роки тому +102

    520 fighting for his life from 180 on

    • @Introgamer14
      @Introgamer14 4 роки тому +9

      That's because of smaller engine and bigger turbo. Power of turbo falls off at higher rpm

    • @WymiataczPlays
      @WymiataczPlays 4 роки тому +10

      @@Introgamer14 the "bigger turbo"part is wrong though. It's the programming or setup itself (i don't know if the turbo is really bigger or not than in the old m57. I mean that big turbos pull easily until the very end. Small turbos tend to lose breath at top end.)

    • @Introgamer14
      @Introgamer14 4 роки тому +1

      @@WymiataczPlays yeah, but in the end, the bigger displacement on the 530 helps at high speed and rpm, as the range of torque is advanced. But when you watch turbo dynos, the power always falls off harder than NA or supercharged.
      And obviously a bigger turbo increases that effect. Still comes down to the software setup tho, your right at that point, but software always is the last optimization step

    • @cds401
      @cds401 3 роки тому +1

      @@Introgamer14 A bigger turbo engine does not die up top, it improves high RPM performance but with the downsize increasing turbo lag and worse response. A smaller turbo does choke the engine at high RPM's thus reducing power, but it responses earlier in the rev range.

    • @themanmaschine
      @themanmaschine 2 роки тому

      530d has better torque, so can keep it up for longer

  • @michakrawczyk5797
    @michakrawczyk5797 3 роки тому +9

    Even this old engine with the new ZF8HP transmission would be much faster. In the new engine, the transmission does the job.

  • @Kevink4240
    @Kevink4240 4 роки тому +5

    Thank you for providing us this examples. 🤝

  • @iantownsend500
    @iantownsend500 4 роки тому +16

    Even diesels sound good back then

  • @petrubotezat8705
    @petrubotezat8705 4 роки тому +24

    Без условно м57 лучший

  • @someone-rr7cy
    @someone-rr7cy 4 роки тому +43

    Old good engine BMW is better than new .

    • @evolutionspeed
      @evolutionspeed  4 роки тому

      👌👌

    • @s25117
      @s25117 4 роки тому +3

      Yes but try 530d vs 530d

    • @evolutionspeed
      @evolutionspeed  4 роки тому

      I will.try it 🤗🤗

    • @Aadilf1
      @Aadilf1 4 роки тому +3

      Different engines all together though with different markets. Compare a 520D from 2001 to the 520D from 2020. 2001 520D - 136hp and 36mpg, 2020 520D - 190hp and 61mpg. There's your progress. Not to mention the luxury you get as standard in the 2020 520D.

    • @squalopazzo5178
      @squalopazzo5178 4 роки тому

      BMW 530d E60 M57 218hp and 231 destroy all

  • @william911turbos7
    @william911turbos7 3 роки тому +24

    i’d rather have a old 530d than a new 520d

  • @legionofwarriors
    @legionofwarriors 4 роки тому +3

    ...event though it is lighter .has the same power and torque figures from a smaller engine with 2 cylinders short and more advanced transmission the 530d still holds up wonderful with silky smooth acceleration ..probably because of healthy engine and overal mint condition.

  • @markbrix9385
    @markbrix9385 3 роки тому +4

    So, in 2020 a 2.0 4 cyl 520d can keep up with a 3.0 6 cyl 530d...
    THAT'S IMPRESSIVE!!!

  • @noname-ut8lj
    @noname-ut8lj 4 роки тому +1

    Very good video

  • @argo1974R
    @argo1974R 3 роки тому +1

    So performance wise no need to replace my 2003 E39 530D manual. I hesitate buying newer BMWs, F10 530D or G30 530D, because of their unreliability. Chains, DPFs, electronics, possible longevity issues etc. E39 is pretty reliable and most of the problems I can fix myself. In fact, my E39 been extremely reliable within 250k km. The biggest issue so far, I had to replace the second fuel pump at 110k km. Still on OE turbo and injectors and OE suspension (it's getting noisy though). Rust is the biggest enemy of E39s but I was smart enough to have my car anti corrosion treated.

  • @Edvard.Munchkin
    @Edvard.Munchkin 4 роки тому +13

    While I prefer the 6 cylinder sound older engine, it's amazing that a 2.0 is as fast as a 3 litre now. The advancement in engine technology is brilliant

    • @kkklll694
      @kkklll694 4 роки тому +3

      Yes they do make more power but is it reliable power... I mean the more u take power per liter the unreliable it will be

    • @Edvard.Munchkin
      @Edvard.Munchkin 4 роки тому +1

      @@kkklll694 Yes I understand, I think it might be just about okay though, I don't think 190 is excessive for a 2.0

    • @kkklll694
      @kkklll694 4 роки тому +2

      @@Edvard.Munchkin ill think its just in the border i dont see that these engines could go million kilometers without major issues

    • @Edvard.Munchkin
      @Edvard.Munchkin 4 роки тому

      @@kkklll694 Well probably not a million but who keeps a car that length? I would be more worried about the 525d

    • @kkklll694
      @kkklll694 4 роки тому +2

      @@Edvard.Munchkin well i do i drive e39 530d 600tkm on it and 400tkm of those are my driven

  • @tristanespagno8121
    @tristanespagno8121 3 роки тому +10

    Car rent agency gave me a 2020 520d for a week . I have a 2001 330xd. I feel my e46 more powerfull...

  • @polakdawido
    @polakdawido 4 роки тому +2

    I'd like to see the fuel consumption after that. I bet the e39 was close or only slightly worse. My 520d 2011 manual was doing 3 mpg worse than my dads 530d 2001 auto with me driving both cars.

    • @supertreme5559
      @supertreme5559 4 роки тому +3

      i would like to see the day that a 3liter old e39 used less than a 2liter. i have a e61 530xd with manual gearbox and it uses 7.0L/100km and we have a 520D e60 with manual gearbox and that uses 5.0L/100km. THIS IS WHEN THE CARS ARE DRIVEN NORMALLY IN THE TOWN AND ROADS OUTSIDE THE TOWN I LIVE IN

  • @ion_husanu3
    @ion_husanu3 4 роки тому +7

    E39 530d Legende 🖤👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👍🏼

  • @incyphe
    @incyphe 4 роки тому +103

    530d sounds 100x better. 520d sounds awful....

    • @kidnapthemoneyy01
      @kidnapthemoneyy01 4 роки тому +6

      it's normal 3.0l 6cyl vs 2.0l 4 cyl

    • @marcof-hy5dv
      @marcof-hy5dv 4 роки тому

      just as the acceleration x.x

    • @R53.charlie
      @R53.charlie 3 роки тому

      Alek Wolf 😂😂

    • @sv52308
      @sv52308 3 роки тому

      @@ayushasuvarna.8399 😑

    • @thepharcyde8285
      @thepharcyde8285 3 роки тому +1

      all 2 litre diesel engines from bmw sound super weird even the new models. I own f30 3 litre and it's super quiet.

  • @xsxyz345
    @xsxyz345 3 роки тому +3

    3.0d bmw has best 6 cyl engines!

  • @g.s.7383
    @g.s.7383 3 роки тому +8

    2.0 is not powerful - it's the transmission that's quick and does not choke the power down.

    • @kelvynmoore4882
      @kelvynmoore4882 3 роки тому

      Correct. It’s why Mercedes has a 9-speed gearbox in the 220d. And Ford a 10-speed in its 2.2 Ranger. Years ago 50cc racing bikes had 15 gear ratios. Manual too 😂.

    • @paradox5556
      @paradox5556 3 роки тому

      @@kelvynmoore4882 more gears doesn't always mean faster though

    • @kelvynmoore4882
      @kelvynmoore4882 3 роки тому

      @@paradox5556 It depends on what you mean by "faster". You need to be more specific in the definition. For example, V-Max (theoretical top speed) is ultimately limited by:
      1. BHP
      2. Gearing, specifically final drive (and differential) ratios
      3. Drag coefficient
      4. Mechanical drag (ie power lost through operating secondary mechanical systems from the engine)
      So yes, mechanical gearing does play a part in Vmax, final drive ratio in particular. But it is not the only limiting factor as you correctly state. However in acceleration terms, gearing ratios and the amount of the available gears do play a much more significant part in the "faster" measurement. Gearing can compensate for relative lack of BHP, CoD and mechanical drag. So it can definitely make a vehicle "faster".

  • @sprinkler66
    @sprinkler66 3 роки тому +2

    I thought much better for both of them. My Volvo V60 D4 181hp 4cyl. 8 gears with 140k km hits 200kph in 30 sec

  • @julienphil537
    @julienphil537 4 роки тому +22

    M57 30d life time +500 000kms , 20d 190 ...

    • @lieberfreialsgleich
      @lieberfreialsgleich 4 роки тому

      julien Dave 150000km, bmw has officially published it. Lifetime= 150000... that‘s why Bmw dealers don‘t sell cars with more than 120000km.

    • @JovanKorica1
      @JovanKorica1 4 роки тому +6

      @@lieberfreialsgleich no way they said that

    • @squalopazzo5178
      @squalopazzo5178 4 роки тому

      My 320d E91 M47 163 hp at 260k km go over 240 km/h...

    • @JovanKorica1
      @JovanKorica1 4 роки тому +1

      @@squalopazzo5178 not standard on the flat. must be a bit downhill. maybe 230 tops

    • @BlinkY.
      @BlinkY. 4 роки тому

      @livey oone Bullshit! All that storys about lifetime = 10years or 100000km are born in forums by random users...
      show me at least one source where BMW comments on "lifetime" with 100.000km

  • @kwokhau299
    @kwokhau299 3 роки тому +1

    This is awd?? It only took the 520d 6 seconds too reach 100 other cars need 7.5 seconds with same power.

  • @miked5789
    @miked5789 3 роки тому +4

    I'll take the M57 over that 4cyl everytime...

  • @imnotaplayer957
    @imnotaplayer957 4 роки тому +1

    Old but gold

  • @user-ol4uu6nr9e
    @user-ol4uu6nr9e 3 роки тому +1

    Странный миф - "до 2005 года" ;), но это не касается модельного ряда авто после 2005-го с моторами М-серии.
    УМНИКИ у которых БМВ 2006+ год, Вам либо повезло с покупкой б/у авто, или Вы "что-то знаете" :)

  • @sergiojippys3838
    @sergiojippys3838 3 роки тому +2

    I have a 520d 190ps and it’s Not such a smooth engine, adequate but Not fast. But he’s very economical with an average fuel consumption under 6 liters/100km

  • @JOTIXOXO
    @JOTIXOXO 3 роки тому

    Who is the driver in old bmw? Gear changes are awesome! It looks like DSG

  • @JD-sd7yw
    @JD-sd7yw 4 роки тому +4

    М57 🚀

  • @adambenk0
    @adambenk0 3 роки тому +5

    Crazy how far we have come in 19 years :) 4 cylinder beating 6 cyl.

    • @jojajo2707
      @jojajo2707 8 місяців тому

      E39 was faster from 100-200

  • @alestra1021
    @alestra1021 3 роки тому +1

    Most people in the comments forget that the new one is much heavier than the old one

  • @banny123456
    @banny123456 3 роки тому

    some HP were lost in that 530d :) still a solid and reliable engine if treated well.

  • @sloop81
    @sloop81 3 роки тому +6

    With 8 gears (like 520D has) 530D will be quicker.

  • @NameSchema100
    @NameSchema100 3 роки тому

    The e39 in the video is only the 184hp pre facelift version you can see it on the speedometer....

  • @dr.H149
    @dr.H149 4 роки тому +1

    После 150 ти обьем выигрывает:)

  • @tlustejmicin
    @tlustejmicin 3 роки тому

    They may have moved the technology forward but old bmw is an old bmw, sound comes directly from the engine bay and a nice one!
    And today they want you to go into the authorized service shop with every bullshit that happens to your car.
    No thank you.
    Sticking with my ol'man :)

  • @legioner9
    @legioner9 3 роки тому +2

    The older automatic gearbox is very good and reliable. Look how smooth it is. There is literally insignificant difference between the old and the new car in terms of performance. I would say that the older car is faster. E39 BMW is definetly one of the best cars ever made. They don't make them like they used to, that's for sure.
    E39 with manual gearbox and the 2019 BMW 5-Series would be left behind.

  • @marianchirila3007
    @marianchirila3007 3 роки тому +1

    Todays european cars are smalls 4 cylinder. There is a Renault Traffic van with 3 cylinder gasoline engine 999cc. Thats a motorcicle engine in a 2T car.

  • @frantapolak
    @frantapolak 3 роки тому +11

    Video with such a nice idea, but how badly executed... :(

  • @kokoscom
    @kokoscom 3 роки тому

    SAME HP... how about the torque??

  • @skotsephrenia1
    @skotsephrenia1 4 роки тому +1

    Torque kills..

  • @mastersimful
    @mastersimful 4 роки тому +3

    6cilinder is much more smooth

  • @justintaffe4156
    @justintaffe4156 3 роки тому +6

    A 2020 - 530d Destroys BOTH. THE END.

  • @user-no6wd4iy2c
    @user-no6wd4iy2c 3 роки тому +1

    Единственное место где так едут е39 это ютуб)

  • @256mehdi
    @256mehdi 3 роки тому +3

    M57 best engine diesel.

  • @titifill2712
    @titifill2712 3 роки тому +1

    Sauf que tu te base sur un vieux chat ou les compteurs ont une erreur de 10 à 15% au dessus de 100...avec une vitesse par GPS.. La récente lui met des claques sans soucis

  • @hrmodernatherapeutic9566
    @hrmodernatherapeutic9566 3 роки тому

    It's a 320d g30 . The g30 5 series just got new type speedometer design only with the LCI facelift .

    • @filiiony4727
      @filiiony4727 2 роки тому

      That is not true .From the end of 2019 even the non facelift(no Lci) 5 series has the new design speedometer with idrive 7.

  • @user-ho6hn6ud7b
    @user-ho6hn6ud7b 4 роки тому +3

    Итог : чем меньше объем, тем быстрее разгоняется

  • @alexandrefernandes2663
    @alexandrefernandes2663 4 роки тому

    But 530d have 5 our 6 gears and 520d have 7 our 8 gears. Have differences

  • @user-pf4lg3yq3v
    @user-pf4lg3yq3v 4 роки тому +1

    2.0터보굿

  • @miljororforsprakpartiet290
    @miljororforsprakpartiet290 3 роки тому

    It's like RS3 vs Model S Tesla. Tesla quick as hell to 100 then goes to sleep hahaha xD

  • @15284750
    @15284750 3 роки тому +3

    2038: BMW 510d same dynamic

    • @hiko6424
      @hiko6424 3 роки тому

      I'm waiting for 505d.

  • @elvis3568
    @elvis3568 3 роки тому +3

    The 520 d 2019 will be died earlier than 530 d. Its logicall

  • @albertlee8342
    @albertlee8342 3 роки тому

    Lighter wt. and Smaller body built 2001 530d that is not fair to compare with the wt. and body size of today 520d for their accelerations and top speeds

  • @p.h.n.x8288
    @p.h.n.x8288 3 роки тому +5

    Imagine sitting in your 2020 520d and getting absolutely destroyed by a 20y/o car :P

    • @mladenbro8435
      @mladenbro8435 3 роки тому +6

      wouldnt call this getting absolutely destroyed

    • @themanmaschine
      @themanmaschine 2 роки тому

      It happens!

    • @stormdancer1910
      @stormdancer1910 Рік тому +1

      I mean, the 520d is the smallest diesel you can get and the 530d was the biggest diesel you can get... so the fastest model is just as fasdt as the slowest model 20 years later.

  • @chaipovr
    @chaipovr 3 роки тому +1

    530d wit over 300 000kms ans 20 y.o

  • @mik3952
    @mik3952 2 роки тому +1

    Truth being told...530d is slower. Not in this video, but because 2001 530d was some 200kg lighter than 2020 520d...It's not the big engine, it's the lighter car! Put the same weight on both cars and see what happends...530d gets smoked fare and square.

  • @MrDual2
    @MrDual2 3 роки тому

    Damn I thought that it has 2001190 hp 😂

  • @Bani-1998
    @Bani-1998 4 роки тому +6

    You can’t compare a 6 cylinder 3.0 with 4 cylinder 2.0 Engine

  • @przemekbanach6821
    @przemekbanach6821 3 роки тому

    Respect for granny, we ll se u little after 300kkm

  • @sylwestersamborski6581
    @sylwestersamborski6581 3 роки тому

    Expose your observations more explicitly in the movie. Good luck!

  • @cosminmihu9963
    @cosminmihu9963 4 роки тому +4

    It seems that modern transmission and drive-train makes it faster from a start, I'm guessing the E39 is more aerodynamic at high speed as it catches up to the G30.

    • @evolutionspeed
      @evolutionspeed  4 роки тому +1

      👌👌

    • @markoandrijevic8885
      @markoandrijevic8885 4 роки тому +3

      Not more aerodynamic, maybe a little but that didnt make it win in this case. Its 1000ccm more in the e39 and also 2 cylindrs more so that engine behaves much better from 150 + kph

    • @cosminmihu9963
      @cosminmihu9963 4 роки тому +2

      @@markoandrijevic8885 The extra capacity would not make a difference, unless it has more power and torque at that specific rev range. The E39 does have 10 more Nm torque, 2-3 extra hp and 40-50 less kg.

    • @cartere9981
      @cartere9981 4 роки тому +1

      Marko Andrijevic engine size isn’t how power works

    • @markoandrijevic8885
      @markoandrijevic8885 4 роки тому +1

      @@cartere9981 i know that bro. But can u 100% claim that 2.0 turbo 190hp engine and 3.0 non turbo or kompresor engine with same hp will behave the same. 2.0 is goint to be faster 0 to 100( if they both rwd or 4wd ofc) but 3.0 is more healthy and will behave better on higher speeds as i said and thats the fact. Im telling the because i have tried both. Bigger non turboed engines are called "raw power" for reason

  • @IH6848
    @IH6848 3 роки тому

    The 530D will still be going long after the timing chain self distructs on the 520D and writes off the engine.

  • @Dale-qy2yu
    @Dale-qy2yu 4 роки тому +8

    6,4 to 100 in a 520d? or maybe 320d? i think this is not possible!

    • @medalex
      @medalex 4 роки тому

      320d takes around 10 sec

    • @KorpiSoturi1
      @KorpiSoturi1 4 роки тому +1

      @@medalex G20 320d does 0-100 km/h in 6.9 seconds...

    • @imnotaplayer957
      @imnotaplayer957 4 роки тому +3

      @@KorpiSoturi1 not even close.. Maybe in a bmw 120d will close 7sek

    • @KorpiSoturi1
      @KorpiSoturi1 4 роки тому +1

      @@imnotaplayer957 BMW themselves say that g20 320d xdrive does 6.9 seconds, so...

    • @KorpiSoturi1
      @KorpiSoturi1 4 роки тому +1

      @@imnotaplayer957 ua-cam.com/video/WLAHxQP2wrs/v-deo.html
      6.79 seconds 0-100km/h

  • @POCTOB1986
    @POCTOB1986 4 роки тому +1

    Да уж....

  • @user-ol4uu6nr9e
    @user-ol4uu6nr9e 3 роки тому

    В чем отличие двигателей БМВ М и N серии?! Первый - это "Бавария" (эмоции/содержание), второй - а это точно БМВ (обслуживание/или Toyota)?!

  • @zzracer
    @zzracer 3 роки тому

    old american truth says: no replacement for displacement

  • @user53498
    @user53498 3 роки тому

    both cars are remapped for sure

  • @isaacl1439
    @isaacl1439 3 роки тому

    The 2001 and 2019 bmw 520d is so slow that even my moms subaru wrx base model 4 cylinder car would whoop it on ralley racing track and top speed racing, even a 2001 subaru wrx Sti 305hp would whoop this car no problem in anything and you can find Subaru’s in Canada for $5k

  • @aaa113123123
    @aaa113123123 Рік тому

    Лично проверено, 530d e39 быстрее 520d на 2 корпуса, после 402 метров отрыв ещё больше. Так что видео не совсем правильное

  • @commantrosexetlos4700
    @commantrosexetlos4700 4 роки тому

    you can almost see the time it was downhill

    • @Samastano
      @Samastano 3 роки тому

      😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @sokolmiftari3887
    @sokolmiftari3887 3 роки тому

    people who say that is not improvment are stupid , first of all the 520 d can do 50mpg and its mutch clean for the envirment and the old 2001 530 can not do better than 25mpg and its very bad for the air bc it release to mutch carbon , so thats a big improvment in eficency,air polution and power its the same, and dont forget how mutch more comfrotable and mutch safier and heavier the new 520 is , and do a comparison 530d vs 530 d

  • @wildyracing1
    @wildyracing1 3 роки тому +1

    On higher speeds, the bigger engine clearly runs faster. I prefer the 3.0 inline 6 over any turbo milk jug BMW had come up recently.

  • @agovics1
    @agovics1 3 роки тому

    Yeah and the 530d will last 20 years and the 520d till the warranty goes out xD

  • @joseteixeira5900
    @joseteixeira5900 3 роки тому

    There is no replacement for displacement. That’s all.

  • @Iceeeen
    @Iceeeen 3 роки тому +1

    E39 any day of the week, the m57 will also do a million kilometers with just a turbo and some injectors, the 520d will need 4 engines for thay. It also doesn't have a million annoying anti crash systems that beeps at you every other second 🤢
    + The fuel consumption is about the same

  • @goldzahnjackson8729
    @goldzahnjackson8729 3 роки тому

    518d BITTE DANKESCHÖN

  • @slobasloba6586
    @slobasloba6586 4 роки тому

    0-100 520d is better but 100-200 530d.

  • @edwardvanbuffett2365
    @edwardvanbuffett2365 4 роки тому

    배기량이 깡패네

  • @sergfreeman2987
    @sergfreeman2987 3 роки тому +2

    3-series weighs mush less so comparison are irrelevant.

    • @robbieshaft
      @robbieshaft 3 роки тому +1

      these are both 5-series in the video

  • @s25117
    @s25117 3 роки тому

    20 years later, other name, more money and same speed. 20 years for nothing

    • @Allias320
      @Allias320 3 роки тому

      s25117
      You are comparing a 6 cylinder against 4
      The 520d did a good job
      Now compare the 530d e39
      Aginst the new g30
      530-550d they all have a 3.0 6cylinder engine....

  • @luckyhack78
    @luckyhack78 4 роки тому +6

    bmw = 6 Cylinder or more , 4 cylinder never , awefull sound and y dont trust those engines

  • @martinkunze344
    @martinkunze344 3 роки тому

    Niemals 0-100 unter 7 Sekunden, das schafft nicht mal der 3er mit dem 2 Liter motor

  • @Termiic
    @Termiic 3 роки тому +1

    The only way to get that much power out of 2.0 is to sacrifice on something, lighter pistons, higher boost pressures, that at the end of the day means LONGETIVITY of the engine. But in our times no one cares about that. Drive it 5 years, trash it, buy a new one, trash it as well.

  • @SonnyLT
    @SonnyLT 4 роки тому +2

    @ 0:08 it says 320d...but then its 520d...

  • @maguslloretmunoz2354
    @maguslloretmunoz2354 4 роки тому +2

    530d 2001 is not 190hp, it's 193 hp

    • @Bani-1998
      @Bani-1998 4 роки тому

      Maguslloret Munoz 194ps

    • @maguslloretmunoz2354
      @maguslloretmunoz2354 4 роки тому +1

      @@Bani-1998 No men, you are wrong, don't tell me about BMW, 530d e 39 first came with 184 hp, and later with 193 hp, sorry

  • @butwheresthebeef
    @butwheresthebeef 2 роки тому

    2001... when you could tell it's a BMW by the look of the speedometer. Designer deserves kick in the nuts... and non linear speedo is just awful. And ofc M57 all the way!!!!

  • @danielkunzmann1587
    @danielkunzmann1587 4 роки тому +5

    4 Zylinder engines suck !!!!!! They have no Power after 160 KmH !!!!! And if it goes up a hill , its not funny !!!
    & Zylinder always brings the power down or up hill !!!!!!

  • @carloM635csi
    @carloM635csi 3 роки тому

    LA NUOVA STRUMENTAZIONE BMW !!?? PROPIO BRUTTA !! PREFERISCO LA VECCHIA

  • @gypzino
    @gypzino 3 роки тому +1

    They re both slow as hell

  • @nunofernandes678
    @nunofernandes678 3 роки тому +1

    I'd take that 30d a million times.