Restoring Coldwell Tower - The Restoration Man - S02 EP5 - Home Renovation

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 210

  • @fredperry523
    @fredperry523 7 місяців тому +12

    Well done to Scotland Heritage & planning - you have approved a lavatory addition !

  • @dawnkytle2284
    @dawnkytle2284 4 роки тому +90

    That is so sad. Planning really shamed this Scottish castle tower. Heartbreaking.

  • @ericgrigorof1509
    @ericgrigorof1509 4 роки тому +104

    The planners turned down the glass extension for "not fitting in" but intead approved blue plastic siding? There's a reason extensions for old buildings are so often made of glass, because you can see the old building through it.

    • @packradtpackradt4581
      @packradtpackradt4581 2 роки тому +12

      This is what you get when planners turn down two more visually reasonable requests. Okay; we do it your way. Six years in, as a homeowner, you just want it done.

  • @mutlupb
    @mutlupb 4 роки тому +157

    That tower is a monstrosity. Truly horrific. And when he talked about painting the inside, holy hell, I felt the blood boiling up to my brain. I feel sorry for all the people who have to look at it now.

    • @mutlupb
      @mutlupb 4 роки тому +20

      Oh, and the PVC windows? Oh god.

    • @stacyp1963
      @stacyp1963 3 роки тому +4

      I agree100%!!!😠

    • @Strideo1
      @Strideo1 2 місяці тому

      The government approved it and even rejected better looking proposals so . . . 🤷

  • @itorapadas
    @itorapadas 4 роки тому +43

    Should have painted it a dark grey. It's that simple.
    And the previous owner's proposal for a glass extension would not have been obtrusive from afar compared to the approved plan.

    • @kathleenp9643
      @kathleenp9643 3 роки тому +4

      Totally agree!

    • @me-l-9910
      @me-l-9910 3 роки тому +1

      And the tower fellow says he'll be painting it green? Well there's green and there's green. It could be a vast improvement or something so much worse! Good luck!

    • @patmaurer8541
      @patmaurer8541 2 роки тому +4

      Any of the previous owner's plans would have been lovely and harmonious. I don't know what planning was thinking; they are responsible for this disappointing and sorry outcome.

    • @angrybird9925
      @angrybird9925 Рік тому +3

      Why. Why that blue turd hanging off the side? Would have looked better if the whole addition was stone.

  • @MakeMineaDouble
    @MakeMineaDouble 4 роки тому +50

    That tower deserved better. Blue siding..? What were they thinking?

    • @andreaandrea6716
      @andreaandrea6716 3 роки тому +2

      (That's the problem; they can't. Candy floss for brains).

  • @nancyn347
    @nancyn347 Рік тому +4

    First time I think I've seen George speechless. And there were no "fantastics", "incredibles" or "stunnings" to be heard! Thanks for the upload.

  • @987654321mnbv
    @987654321mnbv 3 роки тому +66

    It is very hard to believe that the blue extension and white vinyl windows were approved while more elegant and less intrusive projects were rejected.

  • @Mario7p
    @Mario7p 4 роки тому +19

    44:35 lmao that face says it all

  • @WilldoAldone
    @WilldoAldone 4 роки тому +73

    Turned historical into hysterical. Planning commission should be fired.

    • @doolie165
      @doolie165 4 роки тому +8

      the castle tower is horrendous.

  • @Ashitaka255
    @Ashitaka255 3 роки тому +18

    The host's face every time he enters a new room just cracks me up. Man's doing all he can to not show his disdain.

  • @ReviewBoard-uy5nv
    @ReviewBoard-uy5nv 3 роки тому +49

    That Scottish tower extension is an EYESORE. The color, the shape of that blue embarrassment can be seen for miles! Scotland really cocked this one up. Inside and out. The previous owner’s designs were MUCH better. TripAdvisor pics from 2020 also show how much it has deteriorated

  • @getin3949
    @getin3949 4 роки тому +34

    A new Scottish ballad, "Barry Botched the Tower, Barry Botched the Tower."

    • @Strideo1
      @Strideo1 7 місяців тому

      Seems the planning commission botched the tower since they rejected more sensible plans.

  • @GeordieBoy1955
    @GeordieBoy1955 3 роки тому +24

    I have always thought that planners and conservation / heritage officials were too demanding as regards the restrictions imposed on owners who want to renovate historic buildings so how the hell did that monstrosity in Scotland receive approval?

    • @andreaandrea6716
      @andreaandrea6716 3 роки тому +5

      I'm gob-smacked. Couldn't agree with you more.

  • @amyjones8114
    @amyjones8114 4 роки тому +36

    That was frustrating af to watch.

  • @alisonoxholm9315
    @alisonoxholm9315 4 роки тому +41

    omg they ruined the castle ..whats the ugly blue shed stuck on the side , it looked beautiful in its original shape

  • @songs4thesoul
    @songs4thesoul 4 роки тому +4

    Definitely appreciated the contrast of a project done right and one that isn't. After watching a few of these shows. I see why the planning commission gives people a hard time. Sometimes things are just better left as they are. Oh well.

  • @getin3949
    @getin3949 4 роки тому +45

    What a mess, the design is nice but BLUE and SIDING, not stone? This is a true folly and a total mess. How is this tower in keeping with the look of the old tower?

    • @MakeMineaDouble
      @MakeMineaDouble 4 роки тому +8

      I agree, it looks dreadful.

    • @getin3949
      @getin3949 4 роки тому +3

      @@MakeMineaDouble The people that allowed this man to ruin this building should be drawn and quartered.

    • @MakeMineaDouble
      @MakeMineaDouble 4 роки тому +3

      @@getin3949 I can't believe there is nobody protecting these beautiful structures. A heritage society or something.

  • @naui_diver9290
    @naui_diver9290 4 роки тому +7

    Barry's finished product....myyyyyyy gawwwwwwwd!

  • @myraandersen9881
    @myraandersen9881 4 роки тому +19

    blue siding is not right. Natural wood would have been more in keeping

    • @getin3949
      @getin3949 4 роки тому +4

      Don't you think stone would have been the obvious choice?

    • @myraandersen9881
      @myraandersen9881 4 роки тому +4

      @@getin3949 Yes but they the historic planning would not approve it. Because it is a listed building they had to put something completly different for the addition.

    • @TaytahniTorra
      @TaytahniTorra 4 роки тому +1

      @@myraandersen9881 oh that's interesting

  • @Madfattdeeb
    @Madfattdeeb Рік тому +2

    Wow, Barry has really made a mess of that beautiful old tower.😮😔

  • @saibliss7976
    @saibliss7976 3 роки тому +11

    Sarah lady of the tower what a personality.💖

    • @nancyn347
      @nancyn347 Рік тому

      Well, she is an actress.

  • @WilldoAldone
    @WilldoAldone 4 роки тому +30

    Have to agree with the mojority of the consensus here. Complete ruin of an aesthetically beautiful medieval tower. Looks like they stuck a caravan on the side and called it a day. My opinion is to make it work as is, live smaller in a beautiful building. Thats why you bought it after all, was the way it looked. You changed it into something completely different.
    I feel the same about the orher one too. Leave it alone, just restore it, with kitchen and loo. Then you'll have the building you loved in the first place.

    • @getin3949
      @getin3949 4 роки тому +3

      I don't think Barry actually liked it the way it was in the first place or he wouldn't have changed it so drastically. How he got away with this mess is beyond me.

  • @rachelkristine4669
    @rachelkristine4669 3 роки тому +54

    They have absolutely DESTROYED that wonderful medieval tower! Its just bloody HORRIBLE! And shame on Scotlands planners for not just allowing it, they even encouraged it! 🙄

    • @59tante
      @59tante Рік тому

      Agreed...damn ugly

    • @Strideo1
      @Strideo1 7 місяців тому +2

      Imagine having a planning department of idiots decide what you can do with your property.

  • @benjoyce5853
    @benjoyce5853 4 роки тому +28

    Horrific to watch, I don't actually blame Barry on this one, I think after years of planning appeals he was just desperate to get *something* built. The building's blood yet again is on the planning department. Their endless refusals led him down this path and I just cannot believe the final plan for the extension was approved. What a tragic waste of a spectacular building.

  • @heatherthefireislefairy5469
    @heatherthefireislefairy5469 4 роки тому +12

    it's ugly with the blue sidings that do not look like they go, why did they not match the siding to the door? The stone looks good the rest is trash. The other lady will probably never build if she can't have her roof room.

  • @Saraseeksthompson0211
    @Saraseeksthompson0211 2 роки тому +2

    I think they should have just enclosed the staircase in some sort of faux stone and then left the exterior as is and then painted the rooms white and bright. A reception room on the first floor, a kitchen/bathroom/utility on the second and a bedroom at the top. And in the future, the roof could have made a beautiful outdoor dining space with a movable glass roof. So many options available.

  • @jordanrelkey
    @jordanrelkey 4 роки тому +29

    Barrie "Botched the Tower" Taylor. Good on him for persevering, and preserving the structure, but the design and polish looks trash from my point of view.

    • @getin3949
      @getin3949 4 роки тому +6

      How in god's name did he get away with putting BLUE siding on it, it looks horrible. The planning commissioner must have been on drugs.

    • @jordanrelkey
      @jordanrelkey 4 роки тому +3

      @@getin3949 I first thought he must have paid a substantial bribe to someone with enough clout to the planning commissioner. Barrie does seem just wealthy enough.

    • @getin3949
      @getin3949 4 роки тому +3

      @@jordanrelkey I wouldn't doubt that one bit because no one else gets away with this type of refurb., its just dreadful. And again I say BLUE SIDING???? Good god, have people gone mad?

  • @wandajames6234
    @wandajames6234 3 роки тому +9

    It's time to realize we can re-purpose these buildings or let them crumble to dust. It can be done tastefully and with respect without trying to keep it exactly as it was. NOTHING lasts forever and isn't it better that these structures are at least reincarnated and given a new reason for being than letting them disintegrate?? Life simply cannot be so hidebound that we'd rather let something die than give it a facelift. After all these people have put money into these places and should be granted some concessions as they are willing to keep them going and have to also LIVE IN THEM. Too much interference. You want it restored to original? Then YOU pay for it. At that initial meeting Sarah could have suggested a nice smaller subtle roofed compartment on the top of the tower that wouldn't drastically impact its integrity-- but to just say 'NO' categorically without even entertaining ANY designs smacks of dictatorship. I would have been furious and told him off.

  • @debrap947
    @debrap947 4 роки тому +19

    So after all those attempts to get approved...the planning commission approved that butt ugly "addition". smh George was right, Barrie was not the right man for this job.

  • @paisley293
    @paisley293 4 роки тому +2

    Barry's 'wreckovation' of the tower truly looks as though he piled up a bunch of blue boxes next to it. Methinks Sir Walter Scott must have had a foreboding of it, when he wrote this poem:
    "'Why sit'st thou by that ruin'd hall,
    Thou aged carle so stern and grey?
    Dost thou its former pride recall,
    Or ponder how it pass'd away?'-
    Answer: Barry and his girlfriend killed it!! But they will be painting it green lol

  • @daftlam1510
    @daftlam1510 3 роки тому +5

    I don't often comment, but my god, what an eyesore. This shows planners are totally incompetent. Monty Python could not have come up with a better public toilet.

  • @TaytahniTorra
    @TaytahniTorra 4 роки тому +4

    Why the random blue wood panelling. They should've made it all stone outside or something of natural colour. It's weird. I'm surprised he got permission for that. And the other lady's tower, maybe a rail on the roof so not one falls off or make it into roof garden. She could of met them planners half way. There's was so much potential in both buildings.

  • @skinnysim
    @skinnysim 4 роки тому +12

    Botched the Tower
    truly tasteless

  • @wandajames6234
    @wandajames6234 3 роки тому +4

    Barrie's extension is horrible and they approved that?? Wow!

  • @simonlloyd7557
    @simonlloyd7557 4 роки тому +6

    The tower was an act of vandalism..heartbreaking.

  • @jonarse
    @jonarse Рік тому +2

    The planning committee rejected so many proposals and THAT is what they approved? Gross.

  • @SimonDeBelleme1
    @SimonDeBelleme1 3 роки тому +5

    What did Sarah do with her tower when she realised that she couldn't have her penthouse floor?

  • @arianebelanger69
    @arianebelanger69 8 місяців тому +2

    How could the city reject the glass tower and approve that very ugly add-on to be built?

  • @romystumpy1197
    @romystumpy1197 2 місяці тому

    The blue wooden extension,is more fitting for cornish seaside fishing port

  • @tamaramonster9027
    @tamaramonster9027 3 роки тому +9

    My god what a depressing episode. Although never seen such brutally honest Brits..

  • @aliciapastor8166
    @aliciapastor8166 4 роки тому +1

    Amazing! I love this restoration proyects!

  • @donniestrickland2213
    @donniestrickland2213 3 роки тому +2

    Paint the blue closer to the color of the stone

    • @andreaandrea6716
      @andreaandrea6716 3 роки тому +1

      ... like THAT would help. It's too hideous. Burning it down might work.

    • @donniestrickland2213
      @donniestrickland2213 3 роки тому +1

      @@andreaandrea6716 beauty is in the eye of the beholder

    • @andreaandrea6716
      @andreaandrea6716 3 роки тому +1

      @@donniestrickland2213 Even a cliché won't fix this one.

    • @donniestrickland2213
      @donniestrickland2213 3 роки тому +1

      @@andreaandrea6716 depends on the person doing the work

    • @andreaandrea6716
      @andreaandrea6716 3 роки тому +1

      @@donniestrickland2213 not really. A coat of paint would not fix this horror. The Planning Committee fell down a well on this one as it looks as if a public loo was tacked onto the side of an historic building. Would paint lessen the offense? Only to an a completely untrained eye. Someone was paid off.

  • @deannayoung5311
    @deannayoung5311 4 роки тому +4

    I adore this charming channel
    I have always been drawn to
    Doing something like this...
    I appreciate all who are stubborn
    Enough to make there dreams come true! Bravo to yu all 😁👍👑
    New subscriber now 😊
    Still a bit frustrating to see when
    Those that dont simply listen to expert advice" an the blue needs to be painted grey!!! To keep with
    The lovely scenery...

    • @getin3949
      @getin3949 4 роки тому +1

      I doubt the grey paint would do much to make it blend in. Stone would have been his best choice.

    • @deannayoung5311
      @deannayoung5311 4 роки тому +1

      @@getin3949 oh, yes
      I agree with you 👍😁

  • @monaarchy2367
    @monaarchy2367 4 роки тому

    barry tower lovely .

  • @lorrainewhitlock5377
    @lorrainewhitlock5377 4 роки тому +19

    😱 that square Tower looks awful with that addition. I think they did a terrible job!!!

  • @cpalmieri21
    @cpalmieri21 3 роки тому +7

    I preferred the previous owners rendering with the glass turret and wood/steel addition. Barry’s is terrible. I can’t believe this was approved. Terrible

  • @rodjomanelle
    @rodjomanelle 11 місяців тому

    I think the reason why their plans are rejected is because of the extension they want to attach to the tower. Maybe they should focus on renovating the inside of the tower and fortifying its foundation.

  • @captainKbobkeeshan
    @captainKbobkeeshan 2 роки тому +2

    Well, it's not how I would have liked it. An "eyesore" is a fitting word. But, it's not my tower. And not everyone sees things like I see it. I do think Barry and Sarah have an extremely optimistic viewpoint. I can almost see them falling into a mud puddle and they would say, "well, these clothes needed a wash and look at the beautiful patterns they make on me clothes."
    I would have liked to see an extension like the Windmill tower one where the poor wife passed away before completition. That was nicely done. But then again, the "planning committee" might have denied that as well.

  • @gregory90211
    @gregory90211 4 роки тому +2

    I have a Scottish heritage. Not sure I will ever admit it again.

  • @cassandraotroy
    @cassandraotroy 3 роки тому +3

    So it's not just me thinking that extension on Barry's tower is hideous

  • @paulomontero12
    @paulomontero12 3 роки тому

    That’s what they permitted? They can always used as steps going up to the top?

  • @dedratiger806
    @dedratiger806 3 роки тому +1

    Why on earth did they paint it blue? A sandy brown or even gray would have been so much more pleasing.

  • @turnupthesun81
    @turnupthesun81 3 роки тому +4

    We’re these people the same people who restored that painting of Jesus Christ years ago? What a horror show.

  • @davilianobostonma7669
    @davilianobostonma7669 4 роки тому +2

    Horrible mess! How did they let him do that to the stone tower. Scotland should reconsider this!

    • @getin3949
      @getin3949 4 роки тому +1

      The horse it out of the barn.

  • @mellie4174
    @mellie4174 4 роки тому +2

    omg! i don't get it. if you know you have a classified building why wouldn't the first thing you do is talk to an architect that has positive results with classified buliding's planning!? i do not get it!

  • @marciomatos1975
    @marciomatos1975 4 роки тому +5

    I would defo switch for glass breezeways and glass enclosure for the stairs. Why Planning Commission inspectors were so idiot not to allow glasses in exchange for this intrusive alien?

  • @YuzuruHakushaku
    @YuzuruHakushaku 4 роки тому +5

    as an archaeologist I have to say it is dreadful & frustrating. you know in Iran, if someone do such thing to a historical building (more than 100years old) the ministry of cultural heritage will rook the building from the owner without any payment as a punishment. I hope that traitor who approved it getting fired.

    • @a1kilthire
      @a1kilthire 3 роки тому +3

      Errrrrmmmm, maybe a little extreme

  • @purpleclove1929
    @purpleclove1929 2 роки тому +1

    The Heritage commissions sometimes seem to be a tad bit too nitpicky. I recall watching a show about the restoration of Windsor Castle after the fire. They were initially denied approval to remove interior wall coverings (plaster and such) to allow the stone walls to dry. Apparently, they wanted the building to dry naturally - over decades!! WtH!!! You can't rebuild over that! Eventually there was some kind of compromise!
    Are there fees associated with submissions? As in everytime your plans are rejected, do you have to pay when you resubmit.
    My opinion: Of course I want to see these buildings repaired and remodeled in a way that reflects it's heritage. But part of that heritage includes the fact that they have been remodeled over time, each person adding their own touches. Adding modern amenities is allowed (electricity, HVAC, indoor plumbing.) Also, the cost of this is already high. As well as stressful. Grade 1 & 2 listings are pointless if no one will take on the project. Eventually the building will be gone.... not to mention all the houses that were bulldozed in the 20th century - heartbreaking. This process should be a bit clear and "user friendly?" Not really sure what I would recommend, without seeing the process....
    Anyway, I would love to see a show from the Commissions' perspectives! I'm sure they get many plans that are incredibly off base - like request to turn Gothic Revival into Mid-Century Modern? But I would love to see some real cooperation between commission, homeowners, contractors, etc., to move the process forward with sympathy for the structure, the finances and for the owners who should be allowed to add their mark like so many before them. This is about keeping the legacy alive for future generations! Not just letting it disappear because people are afraid of even trying because the approval process is just too much.

  • @JenaTuckerAquariums
    @JenaTuckerAquariums 4 роки тому +4

    He ruined that beautiful tower!! Now he's going to paint it green oh no!! Poor tower!!

  • @SlaterLater
    @SlaterLater Рік тому

    I would have planted a beautiful garden on the top of the gun tower.

  • @rockypluto2683
    @rockypluto2683 4 роки тому +2

    So if thy care so much about the history of that particular building...don't sell it. And if thy do..let the new owners do as thy please. Those who want to go visit the towers fr historical knowledge can do so at the other numerous towers scattered about.

  • @kristinebailey2804
    @kristinebailey2804 4 роки тому +14

    A shame and a sham. Must have bribed the commission.

  • @me-l-9910
    @me-l-9910 3 роки тому

    Oh my!

  • @Agameda1
    @Agameda1 Рік тому

    Good grief. The poor tower.😮

  • @ThisUsernamewastaken004
    @ThisUsernamewastaken004 2 роки тому

    She surely is an actress 😂😂

  • @ElsieDreamWorld
    @ElsieDreamWorld 2 роки тому +1

    You have to wonder how did they manage to have that extension approved. I agree with many of the comments, it is really horrible, damages the building looks and the whole countryside

  • @kcsunnyone
    @kcsunnyone 3 роки тому +2

    Planning commission should all be fired for the tower monstrosity

  • @monaarchy2367
    @monaarchy2367 4 роки тому +1

    they can changes the paint colour into brown

  • @mrjakenorris
    @mrjakenorris 4 роки тому +4

    Lost for words, how the hell did that get approved. If l lived in that area l'd be gutted. Horrific extension. Even the stone bit looked like a cheap movie set.

  • @RuslanaRovdo
    @RuslanaRovdo 3 роки тому

    Всё, как и у нас! Видимо, это уже глобальный тренд - реставрация сайдингом. Приятно знать, что рукожопы везде одинаковы.

  • @debbie5601
    @debbie5601 4 роки тому +1

    That blue box looks horrible on that beautiful stone tower....

  • @joannagagon6266
    @joannagagon6266 3 роки тому

    Siding???? What were they thinking??

  • @jeanneamato8278
    @jeanneamato8278 3 роки тому +1

    The tower is very unhappy. As it should be.

  • @hurriyetakin1431
    @hurriyetakin1431 Рік тому

    Bu kaleye nasil sahip oldular acaba

  • @paulhemming159
    @paulhemming159 4 роки тому +2

    Like sticking a set aftermarket shat chinese alloys on an etype Jag.... No accounting for tatse, and clearly someone in the planning department needs sacking and that abortion on the side must be removed immediately!

  • @shelleydouglas1263
    @shelleydouglas1263 4 роки тому +11

    That one lady throwing a fit over a glass room seemed like a spoiled child. Her way or no way. I bet the tower ends up in ruins because she didn't get her way.

    • @fatpigeonhgg
      @fatpigeonhgg 3 роки тому +2

      You would be correct. Judging by the google maps satellite view, it's abandoned again.

    • @shelleydouglas1263
      @shelleydouglas1263 3 роки тому +1

      @@fatpigeonhgg How sad

  • @stephenrafter1022
    @stephenrafter1022 Рік тому +1

    Any update.

  • @kathleenp9643
    @kathleenp9643 3 роки тому +1

    Oh my goodness! No. Just no! That stands out like a sore thumb. If that was the only design they would allow, why that color?? It needs to painted ASAP if it must stay that way.

  • @CousinTito
    @CousinTito 4 роки тому +7

    If you won't let the buyer do what he/she wants, then the heritage control freaks should maintain the towers themselves. They just want museum pieces. That's fine but don't bother selling it on the private market. The State or organization should find the money to buy them, fix them or let them fall into ruin (still a museum piece) OR let them go and release control. Especially in Europe where there's a castle around every corner! His tower probably would have looked better with his original plans than some odd colored wood and mock stone creation that they approved. Come on, it's a travesty. And her tower probably would have looked fine with a glass enclosure, more reminiscent of a light house. It could have been beautiful. But both owners should have really done their homework about what the control freaks wanted, they probably would never have bought the towers in the first place. This was a frustrating video.

  • @gorillaglue7232
    @gorillaglue7232 27 днів тому

    There is no accounting for taste!

  • @mrspoker4637
    @mrspoker4637 3 роки тому +2

    wow, that is godawful!

  • @lCaKeSl
    @lCaKeSl 2 роки тому

    Astronomically disappointed in that paneling edition on the outside LOL

  • @joannagagon6266
    @joannagagon6266 3 роки тому

    Why not stone?

  • @bevfrench3496
    @bevfrench3496 Рік тому

    not keen on that color....maybe dark or light grey to match the stone????

  • @totw7790
    @totw7790 4 роки тому +6

    Horrible.

  • @saibliss7976
    @saibliss7976 3 роки тому +2

    Sorry to say the tower in Scotland has been ruined by the blue siding. Eye soar. Could have been restored to, but perhaps smaller scale, to what the original family member had done back in the day mentioned at 6:18. I see why authorities are reluctant, but like the Sir what's his name said start backwards with the historical building first and your own ideas later, how do you fit into this.

  • @stacyp1963
    @stacyp1963 3 роки тому +4

    I know this is a older show but I am absolutely horrified what those people did to that beautiful historic building. I live in the USA and i am so interested in British history. I am SHOCKED that this building was approved for that restoration. This deeply saddens me. 😥😠

  • @dominiqueparisi4618
    @dominiqueparisi4618 4 роки тому +1

    I don't like the existent ion it should of been brick . But blue ?please !

  • @irishpiecute
    @irishpiecute 3 роки тому

    Sorry Caldwell tower is an eyesore , can’t believe the planning office approved it 🥲

  • @cathhumphreys3113
    @cathhumphreys3113 3 роки тому +1

    The planning officers should hang their head's in shame. The first owners plans were far superior and would have fitted into the landscape better .

  • @naui_diver9290
    @naui_diver9290 4 роки тому

    Theres no gin&tonic..she needs a good rogering..YEAH BABY!

  • @jaytay8637
    @jaytay8637 3 роки тому +2

    Anyone with taste or style should avoid this one, and anyone with high blood pressure !

  • @monaarchy2367
    @monaarchy2367 4 роки тому +2

    Seems Uk has no care in the history . .

  • @archy8822
    @archy8822 2 роки тому

    what happen to sera? did she get her house done?

  • @Tom-Lahaye
    @Tom-Lahaye 3 роки тому +5

    That hideous extension on the tower looks like these ugly loft extensions you see on 1960s houses in cities, totally inappropriate to the tower.
    I think the first but rejected plan shown with the wooden staircase with sloping roof was much more treu to a medieval building, especially when done in unfinished Douglas pine which turns grey by the weather.
    I hope they sell the tower and the new owner scraps that part immediately, and the planning commission gets fired.

  • @paulhemming159
    @paulhemming159 4 роки тому +1

    Surely they didn't get the thumbs up from Scottish heritage for what looks like a handful of coucil house extensions stacked upon one another on the side of that beautiful tower. I'd be as sick as a dog if that was in my line of sight. Utterly shocking.... Seriously who in their right mind would have approved that abortion?

  • @zyco706
    @zyco706 2 роки тому

    please i need subtitle

  • @michaelciceraro7707
    @michaelciceraro7707 Рік тому +2

    Watching this was like getting an impacted wisdom tooth pulled. These two people just don't get it. The so called actress was all into herself. So dramatic.

  • @LolaClo
    @LolaClo 2 роки тому

    Dark grey would have been a bit better but blue, that addition is just an eyesore.