@@ismailakviranl9174 I agree thank you Paul. I have been searching for Hasan’s content online and across the Tabar research institute. I have ordered his book and the other companion books in the series by brother Kamal. He makes understanding these concepts so easy so I have to listen to him first before reading any of the books. Shows exactly why we all need teachers. Please have him come on more on to blogging Theology
Subhanallah al Aleem! Mashallah Tabarak Allah! What an absolutely thorough, well-articulated, and courteous deliberation. Listening to this was a blessing and a significant milestone for me. May Allah bless the host, the attendees, and the dear listeners. Alhamdulillahi Rabbil Alameen!
Actually the beginning point is that we are on the verge of an era that lead some of us to ponder beyond the acquainted fields of our mind. Thank you Hasan Spiker and ihvan.
Assalamu alaikum. I've read article by Abdurrahman Mihirig. He states that asharits and nominalist are very close to each other in their ideas. Can anybody explain it?
Like most philosophy enthusiasts today, Mihirig conflates nominalism and anti-realism. These however, are not to be conflated. One refers to a very poor attempt at historiographical categorization that doesn't really refer to any clearly historical phenomenon (see Pasnau, Metaphysical Themes, 83-88), but tries to define 'nominalists' as 'those who do not believe universals qua universals exist outside the mind, and do believe that all reality is particular'. The 'slight' problem with this is that this definition includes Aquinas and Avicenna, who are paradigmatic realists! Anti-realism on the other hand, is the denial that there exists a distinct, objectively knowable world at all. It is very difficult to find a premodern thinker who believes this, and the idea that the Ash'aris were anti-realists is sheer nonsense (for one thing, this would make it impossible for them to claim to be proving the existence of God). So yes, branding the Ash'aris 'nominalists' in either of the two senses, is anachronistic, amateur piffle.
@@purekhizi I'm considering myself as Ashaary and Mihirig's position little bit confused me. Now I'm reading Spiker's book "The things..." and he writes if I understand it properly that nominalist-Kant-Modern philosophy has one unite lineage. And seeing Asharits in such line was strange. But thank you for your answer. It was helpful.
At 13:35, Hasan claims that there's little doubt that single most influential person in western academia, after "him" is Kant. Is that a grammatical error or is he trying to say Hume? Please clarify.
@@farhanrafid8584 I mean come on how could anybody think Sidi Spiker appointed himself the second most important figure of western thought right behind Kant 😂
Fascinating!
Hi
Dear Paul, Thank you for introducing Hasan Spiker to me.
I truly love the scent of Madrasa which gets surfaced with the words of Hasan Spiker.
@@ismailakviranl9174 I agree thank you Paul. I have been searching for Hasan’s content online and across the Tabar research institute. I have ordered his book and the other companion books in the series by brother Kamal. He makes understanding these concepts so easy so I have to listen to him first before reading any of the books. Shows exactly why we all need teachers. Please have him come on more on to blogging Theology
Pure gold. Utter beauty. Brilliant. Thanks for sharing
Floored me by "Ayoha Al-Kant" 😂😂
That is one of the most creative discourses ever come across. 🔥
Subhanallah al Aleem! Mashallah Tabarak Allah! What an absolutely thorough, well-articulated, and courteous deliberation. Listening to this was a blessing and a significant milestone for me. May Allah bless the host, the attendees, and the dear listeners. Alhamdulillahi Rabbil Alameen!
Actually the beginning point is that we are on the verge of an era that lead some of us to ponder beyond the acquainted fields of our mind.
Thank you Hasan Spiker and ihvan.
Wow long session, as is to be expected for this kind of topic!
Fantastic,
Marvelous ❤
Awesome!
Assalamu alaikum. I've read article by Abdurrahman Mihirig. He states that asharits and nominalist are very close to each other in their ideas. Can anybody explain it?
Like most philosophy enthusiasts today, Mihirig conflates nominalism and anti-realism. These however, are not to be conflated. One refers to a very poor attempt at historiographical categorization that doesn't really refer to any clearly historical phenomenon (see Pasnau, Metaphysical Themes, 83-88), but tries to define 'nominalists' as 'those who do not believe universals qua universals exist outside the mind, and do believe that all reality is particular'. The 'slight' problem with this is that this definition includes Aquinas and Avicenna, who are paradigmatic realists! Anti-realism on the other hand, is the denial that there exists a distinct, objectively knowable world at all. It is very difficult to find a premodern thinker who believes this, and the idea that the Ash'aris were anti-realists is sheer nonsense (for one thing, this would make it impossible for them to claim to be proving the existence of God). So yes, branding the Ash'aris 'nominalists' in either of the two senses, is anachronistic, amateur piffle.
@@purekhizi I'm considering myself as Ashaary and Mihirig's position little bit confused me. Now I'm reading Spiker's book "The things..." and he writes if I understand it properly that nominalist-Kant-Modern philosophy has one unite lineage. And seeing Asharits in such line was strange. But thank you for your answer. It was helpful.
@@Tsuroproduction
please do you have electronic book (things as they are...)?
I want this book
@@_IbrahimChahine There's a PDF link in the video description box (
@@SteppinDarqawa
thank you alot
At 13:35, Hasan claims that there's little doubt that single most influential person in western academia, after "him" is Kant.
Is that a grammatical error or is he trying to say Hume? Please clarify.
I mean everyone is entitled to his opinion i guess haha
Him is hegel
He can’t make grammatical error
@@farhanrafid8584 I mean come on how could anybody think Sidi Spiker appointed himself the second most important figure of western thought right behind Kant 😂
Himself! 😂 I thought the same ! Lol ... but no, he's talking about Descartes! Ramadan Mubarak 🙂
who is the person beside Sidi hasan spiker?
Alparslan Açıkgenç
1:23:10
Hello !
'Ayohal Kant' 😂
Hi
Hi
Hi