How the US Navy Zumwalt Class Destroyer Works

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 чер 2024
  • How the US Navy Zumwalt Class Destroyer Works - The ship will be known as the Zumwalt class destroyer, named in honor of Admiral Elmo R. Zumwalt Jr Chief of Naval Operations from 1970 to 1974. It will be the most sophisticated warship in naval history. In this video, we'll take a look at this next-generation destroyer both inside and out to see how it will support national security and military strategies.
    WHAT IS THE ZUMWALT CLASS DESTROYER?
    The Zumwalt class destroyer is a key part of the U.S. Navy's 21st Century Surface Combatant (SC-21) Program, initiated by Navy planners in 1991, to conceive of warships capable of delivering next-generation functionality. The SC-21 Program describes a family of ships designed to fight more effectively in littoral operations, which are those conducted close to the shore. At the same time, SC-21 ships will need to function equally well out in the open ocean. The key is versatility, with ships in the SC-21 family able to handle virtually any mission, from wartime missions in land attack and undersea warfare to noncombatant evacuations to presence, escort and diplomatic missions.
    The SC-21 family includes a destroyer class and a cruiser class of ships. The destroyer class was originally designated DD 21, and to bring the first ships in the class to life, the Navy introduced a four-phase development process. Two competing teams oversaw the first two phases, which involved system concept design and initial systems design. Bath Iron Works, with Lockheed Martin Corporation as the systems integrator, led the first team. Northrop Grumman Ingalls, with Raytheon Systems Co. as the system integrator, led the other.
    Northrop Grumman won the contract to move forward in phase-three design and development, anchoring what would be known as the DD(X) National Team. Raytheon became the National Team's prime mission systems integrator for all electronic and combat systems. Other major subcontractors included Lockheed Martin, BAE Systems, Boeing and General Dynamics Bath Iron Works.
    In November 2005, the DD(X) program received funding approval to enter the fourth and final phase: construction of eight ships. Five months later, the Navy announced that the class and lead ship would carry the designation and hull number DDG 1000 Zumwalt. The first two ships in the class are currently being built, with a targeted delivery date of 2012. When it's commissioned, the DDG 1000 Zumwalt will replace older destroyers of the Spruance class (DD 963 - DD 997) and will complement ships in the Arleigh-Burke class, ushering in a new era of naval warfare.
    In 2001, the U.S. Navy suspended the DD 21 program in order to evaluate progress made in the first two phases. The two design teams introduced several innovative concepts and systems never before seen on a modern warship. Unfortunately, the costs to implement these technologies were estimated to be much greater than originally projected. As a result, the Navy reoriented the program to focus on technology development and maturation, including robust land-based and sea-based testing of prototype technologies that could be leveraged across multiple ship classes." The Navy also replaced the DD 21 designation with DD(X) to signify the updated vision of the program.
    The DDG 1000 has been designed specifically to participate in both traditional military engagements, as well as those that might arise as part of the global war on terrorism. Like destroyers in the Arleigh-Burke class, the DDG 1000 will be multi-mission, capable of providing forward deterrence and presence, and an integral part of joint and combined expeditionary forces. But unlike today's destroyers, the primary mission of the DDG 1000 will be land attack support for ground forces. In fact, one of its most important requirements didn't come from the U.S. Navy, but from the Marine Corps, which, in 2002, requested that the Navy provide 24/7, all-weather, long-range missile-firing capabilities in support of USMC amphibious operations. That means the DDG 1000 will need to operate efficiently in shallow coastal waters - not in quick, hit-and-run missions, but in engagements that may last days or weeks.
    Having a persistent presence in littoral areas is one of the most important design requirements of the Zumwalt class destroyers. Now let's look at some of the ship's other requirements, as outlined by Navy planners:

КОМЕНТАРІ • 583

  • @gx217dc
    @gx217dc 4 роки тому +537

    Looks like it doesnt even need guns or missiles. All it needs to do is to ram into the enemy ship to slice it in half...

    • @SebAnders
      @SebAnders 4 роки тому +59

      Gerald Ander Lee
      Seaman: Enemy ship sighted sir.
      Captain: Ramming speed!
      Seaman: Sir?
      Captain: Goddammit I said Ramming Speed!

    • @fidobeer4667
      @fidobeer4667 4 роки тому +7

      Due to the shape of the front. Aye? 😆😆😆😆😛

    • @cyrilchui2811
      @cyrilchui2811 4 роки тому +13

      @@SebAnders It has a siege tower as well, just need a few Marine sharp shooter to man the tower.

    • @lr_korone_suki267
      @lr_korone_suki267 4 роки тому

      😂😂

    • @Nozaki.
      @Nozaki. 4 роки тому +2

      Lmao

  • @opiwaran354
    @opiwaran354 4 роки тому +128

    bro imagine being a 17th century pirate and feeling really good about the new cannons your ship got and then you see this

    • @pluggothesluggo5509
      @pluggothesluggo5509 3 роки тому +11

      tbh tho they wouldn't even see it coming, just a fucking missle is gonna explode there whole fleat

    • @dichhyashrestha7684
      @dichhyashrestha7684 3 роки тому +6

      But the Pirates would just summon the Flying Dutchess then bro...

    • @havikawakened4882
      @havikawakened4882 2 роки тому +2

      I build these @ biw. I can fully imagine how other countries would feel seeing this roll up on them.

    • @amychan811
      @amychan811 2 роки тому +1

      @@pluggothesluggo5509 nah I sure even a Visby class destroyer is enough

    • @RamboTheGrand
      @RamboTheGrand 2 роки тому +2

      I'd think that is the god of the 7 seas.

  • @cayden3470
    @cayden3470 4 роки тому +38

    Engineers and Designers: So how do you want us to go about this?
    US Navy: Ever watched Star Wars?
    Engineers and Designers: Say no more.

  • @Annonhshsh
    @Annonhshsh 3 роки тому +31

    Me : *sees zumwalt ship*
    Also me: *opens minecraft and builds

  • @j.madelozo8222
    @j.madelozo8222 3 роки тому +35

    12:33 damn that camo is on point

    • @coreysavage8584
      @coreysavage8584 3 роки тому

      Agreed... the profile of the ship and color seem to make it much more difficult to spot against a backdrop of endless ocean and horizon.

    • @SlinkiestTortoise23
      @SlinkiestTortoise23 3 роки тому

      Mate that’s silly good!

    • @user-dg2me3kz5q
      @user-dg2me3kz5q 3 роки тому

      Didn’t notice the bow until a few seconds later

  • @romantorchwick7666
    @romantorchwick7666 4 роки тому +235

    US Navy: we want a better ship
    Engineers designing it: what features would you like to enhance?
    US Navy: Yes

    • @sto2779
      @sto2779 4 роки тому +4

      And the US Navy got ass fucked big time since that pretty US Zumwalt has useless built in weapon system and and it's engine broke down twice. The only benefit I see from this warship is its stealth and gathering local intel for other warships.

    • @rickylafleur9601
      @rickylafleur9601 4 роки тому +3

      S To isn’t it’s purpose to be silent and launch missles from far away

    • @neoblox6753
      @neoblox6753 3 роки тому +2

      @@sto2779 it also will have a railgun so it will likely be an escort vessel or a frontline ship

    • @randomentertainingvideos3545
      @randomentertainingvideos3545 2 роки тому

      @@sto2779 When the next battery breakthrough comes it will probably get lasers and a railgun.

    • @richerd4266
      @richerd4266 2 роки тому

      @@neoblox6753 Railgun ammo got cancelled. Now they're just metal barrels.

  • @fc2p
    @fc2p 4 роки тому +102

    It doesn’t need CIWS.. Not only does its sleek design allow it to outrun missiles, it can display a holographic image of Chuck Norris giving the bird or even a Battleship, thus scaring away potential threats..(which is actually difficult when moving at light speed.) ..no need for useless antennas, they usually break off before mach 10 anyway.

    • @mrkmh1
      @mrkmh1 3 роки тому

      There actually some truth to this escort ships have the capability to make themselves look much larger to fool radar and missiles into firing on the escort and not the aircraft carrier which in turn is trying to look small on radar

    • @fc2p
      @fc2p 3 роки тому

      That’s cool. I’ll tell you one thing, I’d much rather do the painting, fresh-water wash downs, and maintenance on this thing than the cruiser (Normandy CG-60) I was on..

    • @reclusiarchgrimaldus1269
      @reclusiarchgrimaldus1269 2 роки тому

      John 3:16
      New International Version
      16 For God so loved(A) the world that he gave(B) his one and only Son,(C) that whoever believes(D) in him shall not perish but have eternal life.(E)

  • @pearsonjohncharles8219
    @pearsonjohncharles8219 4 роки тому +37

    They wanted to by 32 then it was cut to 7 than the current 3. To date has cost 23 Billion$ for just three ships. Rail gun projectile was to cost 50$ thousand each ballooned to $ 700 thousand each , so it was scrapped (weapon) and ship re classed.

    • @SnepBlepVR
      @SnepBlepVR 3 роки тому +1

      MURICA!

    • @rascallyrabbit717
      @rascallyrabbit717 3 роки тому +4

      Hey, these kinda cost overruns happen from time to time, you win some, you lose

    • @CH-pv2rz
      @CH-pv2rz 2 роки тому

      @Kunai Cheesnep what’s it liek to be a Cheesedick?

    • @anguswaterhouse9255
      @anguswaterhouse9255 2 роки тому

      To be fair replacing it with the dark eagle missiles was the right call

  • @jonathanj.7344
    @jonathanj.7344 4 роки тому +41

    It reminds me of the CSS Virginia ironclad.

    • @garywheeler7039
      @garywheeler7039 4 роки тому

      @DrMossydog I hear it smells like plastic.

    • @tantofirewater6707
      @tantofirewater6707 4 роки тому

      @@garywheeler7039 probably alot of plastic inside for less weight. It's a stealth destroyer afterall

    • @mikesuggs1642
      @mikesuggs1642 3 роки тому

      It looks like a above surface heavily armored submarine?

    • @ahgodflipper
      @ahgodflipper 3 роки тому

      @@tantofirewater6707 I know first hand it doesn't, but it is stealth. Basically it has a shield all around it, can't remember the name, but anyways it makes it look like anything from a fishing boat to a cruise ship. I know this because I got an actual tour inside it when it docked in ketchikan alaska o believe last year

  • @zebposada
    @zebposada 3 роки тому +14

    Amazing ship. Funny how people think developing this kind of high tech is done without any mistake. Mistakes and trials are common in any kind of development.

  • @alexanderscalzo340
    @alexanderscalzo340 2 роки тому +4

    I hope someday the Zumwalt destroyers can be revamped to be the formidable & revolutionary ship it was designed to be. There’s lots of potential

  • @Neilarmeweak550
    @Neilarmeweak550 3 роки тому +4

    When you turn your graphics all the way down

  • @deaddropholiday
    @deaddropholiday 4 роки тому +85

    Yeah - the engines burn four one-ton bales of hundred dollar bills every minute.

    • @Texaca
      @Texaca 4 роки тому +3

      I thought that was per Hour? They must be having to make up for Northrop Grumman pension contributions for their CEO's

    • @SnepBlepVR
      @SnepBlepVR 3 роки тому +1

      I am Heavy Weapons Guy and this is my weapon. She weighs one hundred and fifty kilograms and fires two hundred dollars, custom dual cartridges at ten thousand rounds per minute.
      It costs four hundred thousand dollars to fire this weapon for twelve seconds.

  • @semco72057
    @semco72057 3 роки тому +6

    That is a great ship and two of the three have been built and is in service with the 3rd one being worked on now and the personnel who work on those ships must feel so proud and love their job.

    • @Roberta_Esposito
      @Roberta_Esposito 2 роки тому +1

      thanks, we do !
      Electrician at Bath.
      Installed 500 miles of cable in these

  • @conanfa18
    @conanfa18 3 роки тому +3

    Very good explanation of this amazing new worship. Thank you.

  • @paulcopper299
    @paulcopper299 2 роки тому +2

    I like the ship for the brutalist design.

  • @Drewster327
    @Drewster327 2 роки тому +2

    Saw one of these today, impressive ship, looks more like a STAR destroyer class ship

  • @odysseusrex5908
    @odysseusrex5908 4 роки тому +14

    FWIW, the Zumwalt class was cancelled after the first two ships, in favor of a new flight of Arleigh Burke class destroyers.

    • @CH-pv2rz
      @CH-pv2rz 2 роки тому

      They were to expensive…

    • @odysseusrex5908
      @odysseusrex5908 2 роки тому +1

      @@CH-pv2rz And not very effective.

  • @PhinneusPrune
    @PhinneusPrune 3 роки тому +8

    "How the US Navy Zumwalt class Destroyer works"
    *Putin grabs a pen and paper and begins to take notes.

    • @IshijimaKairo
      @IshijimaKairo 3 роки тому

      what you described is the Chinese.

    • @richerd4266
      @richerd4266 2 роки тому

      @@IshijimaKairo Why would we ever want to copy this overglorified piece of scrap metal. The ammo for the guns have been cancelled and the ship has jarring electrical issues, and let's not talk about how the Zumwalt is inferior stat-wise to every other destroyer class and above ship in the US arsenal.

  • @thomasromanelli2561
    @thomasromanelli2561 4 роки тому +43

    A quick status recap- the Zumwalt class has no ammunition for its two main batteries, it has fewer VLS cells (80) than the Arleigh Burke class DDGs (96), lacks a dedicated SeaRAM or other CIWS device, the tumblehome hull is unproven in rough seas and the two newer ships have sacrificed a purpose-built stealth superstructure to save money (so the vessel is no longer truly a stealth destroyer). It displaces 16,000 tons as a floating brick that has no effective main armament for which it was designed, limited ability to defend itself from common ASM platforms and limited protection against swarming boat tactics. I don't know what to call this vessel- an experiment, a technologies demonstrator or the means to an end for congressional pork.
    One thing it really isn't- a warship that can match an peer adversary. The United States used to build functional ships that served our needs well. I have no fucking idea what has happened to our country. 😔
    BTW- how many commercials does this video really need? 🤨

    • @public.public
      @public.public 4 роки тому +1

      yet another arms developement scam... And some people wonder why other nations get more bang for their bucks....

    • @beauchamphuberville1355
      @beauchamphuberville1355 4 роки тому

      @@public.public Dunno - `Whilst the Uk destr
      oyers are less...well..Playstation the still cost a bomb.

    • @vamsikrishna.c6277
      @vamsikrishna.c6277 4 роки тому

      What you don't know is that the functional ships were probide to compete with its adverseries....
      US has no capable Adverseries left as Russia is trying to survive while China buys its ships....
      All the countries are behind US in atleast two defense sectors and definitely in Navy

    • @thomasromanelli2561
      @thomasromanelli2561 4 роки тому +2

      @@vamsikrishna.c6277 Russia has reduced its fleet size but is modernizing its vessels. I agree that they currently lack an adequate surface force to seriously contest the USN. China is very different. China has significantly expanded its shipbuilding infrastructure, and is adding new hulls to its surface warfare fleet in prodigious numbers. The Type 55 destroyer is really more akin to the Ticonderoga class cruiser given its displacement and VLC load out for air warfare defense. The successive Type 52 destroyers have incremental improvements in armament and combat systems integration. China is building out its carrier task force complement and LHD-class ships to ensure its amphibious combat capabilities.
      China is building its own ships, and has now started to sell their export variants to other countries like India. China's strategic plan was laid out decades ago, and its ship hull construction rate has already outpaced anything the USN accomplished since the end of the Cold War. The USN continues to build competing designs (the Littoral class variants), is struggling to bring the Ford-class carrier towards initial combat readiness, is seeking a new frigate (to fulfill the failed roles of the LCV) and still needs enough money for Virginia sub Block II upgrades and the entirely new Columbia-class SSBNs. There are personnel problems, budget limitations and the near-continuous loss of the skilled teams needed to man large-scale ship building sites.
      China certainly doesn't have the actual combat experience of the USN (more than sixty years of carrier operations), but then again they're only likely to contest the SCS and already have a lot of fixed infrastructure for A2AD. It doesn't really matter if the US spends even more GDP on its defense budget- its pointless to throw money at ships that simply can't fulfill their missions.
      We've become our own worst enemy.

    • @vamsikrishna.c6277
      @vamsikrishna.c6277 4 роки тому

      @@thomasromanelli2561 Do you really think the carrier class sucks? Because by the time Ford enters into service and other contracts come into play... All the aircraft carriers of US would be decades old and yet more operational capable than any other counterpart. China builds its infrastructure but cannot sell much because its allies are either landlocked or really poor nations pay off like Pakistan. India wouldn't buy any equipment without looking into proper maintenance and mainly a license to build it indigenously. So China is limited to develop its own weaponry and it was warned by Russia for copying their naval version fighter jets.
      By the time China emerges as the number one Navy, US would've replaced atleast two of it's carriers and hopefully be better at its politics.
      US just needs that big Adversary who'd threaten it by putting up a challenge

  • @larou14
    @larou14 4 роки тому +1

    Wouahhh...tout un bateau de défense !!! Excellent !

  • @skatee99
    @skatee99 Рік тому

    Very well done, thank you for this effort.

  • @misia6069
    @misia6069 3 роки тому +2

    I love Zumwalt !

  • @MissNFS
    @MissNFS 4 роки тому +2

    I love how the Ps2 Game Naval Ops Warship Gunner was the first to unveil the Zumwalt Class destroyer 🔥

  • @N330AA
    @N330AA 4 роки тому +66

    If you want a stealth ship, build a submarine.

    • @martinpalmer6203
      @martinpalmer6203 3 роки тому +6

      Dont be silly, this one wastes taxpayer dollars much faster than any submarine ever could.

    • @genericperson6286
      @genericperson6286 3 роки тому +2

      Looks like someone needs to learn about maritime operations

    • @uncannyvalley3190
      @uncannyvalley3190 3 роки тому +1

      Submarines have hundreds of disadvantages compared to a warship, so no

    • @N330AA
      @N330AA 3 роки тому

      @@uncannyvalley3190 Yes but they are actually stealthy, unlike surface ships (including this one)

    • @uncannyvalley3190
      @uncannyvalley3190 3 роки тому +2

      @@N330AA okay good point, too bad this ship’s purpose isn’t being stealthy. It’s GOOD at that, but that’s not it’s entire point. They plan on mounting a rail gun on it which would be awesome but expensive....

  • @brahmburgers
    @brahmburgers 4 роки тому +6

    China (and Iran, N.Korea) love these primers on the inner workings and capabilities of US weapon systems.

  • @bowlampar
    @bowlampar 4 роки тому +9

    Smooth sailing into big wave with no difficulty, and armed with plenty of fire power is necessary to become a destroyer for US navy.

  • @ophiuchus992
    @ophiuchus992 4 роки тому +1

    I love this ship

  • @popshill80
    @popshill80 7 місяців тому

    Sweet looking ship...

  • @martinnicol9196
    @martinnicol9196 4 місяці тому

    Awesome 😮😮

  • @Josho922
    @Josho922 3 роки тому +1

    looks like something off star wars..... I LIKE !!!!!

  • @jonathanwest6564
    @jonathanwest6564 4 роки тому +4

    With the stealth and small boat and helicopterer and fire support guns it would be ideal for seal team support mission's.

  • @mikebarbieri7125
    @mikebarbieri7125 2 роки тому

    Awesome ship

  • @John_Doe657
    @John_Doe657 3 роки тому +2

    Not a fan of that huge square superstructure but i like the hull design

    • @dannywaller4397
      @dannywaller4397 Рік тому

      It'd harder to pick up on radar soon all ships will look like that look at china's new destroyers

  • @ophiuchus992
    @ophiuchus992 4 роки тому

    Good Video

  • @TheYanbibiya
    @TheYanbibiya 4 роки тому

    That looks like an evolutionary jump

  • @orathaifreby2287
    @orathaifreby2287 4 роки тому

    Nice Colours

  • @chrishamblett945
    @chrishamblett945 4 роки тому +45

    How the Zumwalt destroyer works:
    It floats

    • @cpmenninga
      @cpmenninga 4 роки тому +2

      You sure? Looks an awful lot like a submarine.

    • @byronwilmot6453
      @byronwilmot6453 4 роки тому

      I actually died when i saw this

    • @garfieldfarkle
      @garfieldfarkle 4 роки тому +1

      .......it goes around the harbor, too, and seems to have pretty good anchors

    • @garfieldfarkle
      @garfieldfarkle 4 роки тому +1

      @DrMossydog the bow is sharp enough to shave with.

    • @garfieldfarkle
      @garfieldfarkle 4 роки тому

      @@EmperorLionflame Don't worry, it has good anchors!

  • @fangospucklovesveena464
    @fangospucklovesveena464 4 роки тому +1

    We want Lasers, Directed Energy Weapons, the "Pain Wave" and Vulcan guns on this "Bat-ship" too!

  • @arcadiagreen150
    @arcadiagreen150 4 роки тому +17

    I'm not sure how comfortable I feel having a guy with a SUPER thick accent having so much info on our navy lmao

  • @mcwaff8661
    @mcwaff8661 4 роки тому +71

    $800k per shell no thanks

    • @randomuser5443
      @randomuser5443 4 роки тому

      They got it down. Nice

    • @beauchamphuberville1355
      @beauchamphuberville1355 4 роки тому

      @jacktheripped replaced with BRIMSTONE...probably more!

    • @sto2779
      @sto2779 4 роки тому

      i know some people in this world has some common sense, you sound like one.

    • @michaelrunnels7660
      @michaelrunnels7660 4 роки тому +6

      "$800k per shell no thanks". I'm sure you wouldn't hesitate to transmit that to a thousand marines on the beach screaming over the radio for support.

    • @beauchamphuberville1355
      @beauchamphuberville1355 4 роки тому +11

      @@michaelrunnels7660 If we are in a war with 1000 marines on the shore we are all royally fucked.

  • @mikemurphy5898
    @mikemurphy5898 4 роки тому +4

    Deni, where are you from? I don't recognize your accent. Nice video!

  • @protorhinocerator142
    @protorhinocerator142 Рік тому +1

    Stealth works great in the air because it's a 3-dimensional medium. Submarines also, but not surface ships.
    Making a ship into a stealth beast helps somewhat as far as percentages, but it hardly makes the boat unsinkable or impossible to hit. Just shoot some torpedoes in that general direction, and maybe one of them will hit.

  • @JDGillis
    @JDGillis 4 роки тому +40

    The Zumwalt has proven to be a very costly boondoggle.

    • @bendudek9620
      @bendudek9620 4 роки тому +4

      Here me out here have you heard of the F-35C yet

    • @batteredskullsummit9854
      @batteredskullsummit9854 4 роки тому

      Try the F35 B on for size

    • @CH-pv2rz
      @CH-pv2rz 2 роки тому

      The Zumwalts are getting the new Hypersonic glide missile and will become stealthy strategic launch systems…

    • @CH-pv2rz
      @CH-pv2rz 2 роки тому

      @Ben Dudek the Israelis have and they used it to penetrate iranian and russian airspace defended by S400 SAMs and were not detected… So you lose.

  • @muhammadbabur5208
    @muhammadbabur5208 3 місяці тому +1

    His first video.

  • @vipulgupta3077
    @vipulgupta3077 2 роки тому +1

    Best destroyer in the world🔥🔥
    This destroyer is always covered from all side so thay No satelitte get to know the missile or gun this destroyer carry.
    Displacement wait of 15,000 Ton😯😯
    Love from India🇮🇳

  • @rafiqkatana
    @rafiqkatana 4 роки тому +7

    Beautiful looking ship that effectively ended up as a paperweight, so to speak. The US is awesome with how they continue to entertain the rest of the world.

    • @CH-pv2rz
      @CH-pv2rz 2 роки тому

      They are adding the new Hypersonic Missiles to the ships. Making them stealthy strategic missile platforms. Range is said to be up to 2500 miles at Mach 6 for the missile and its glide payload.

  • @Skandalos
    @Skandalos 3 роки тому

    For what kind of battle or combat is this ship coceived?

  • @sublime2craig
    @sublime2craig 3 роки тому +12

    Anyone else find it odd that a guy with a heavy Russian accent is narrating this video?

  • @milesobrien2694
    @milesobrien2694 4 роки тому +35

    The bottom line? $6 BILLION spent and the Zumwalt is sitting at a dock with half of its armament unusable because the ammunition is too expensive. Magnificent example of Congress writing blank checks to the military with no oversight.

    • @knowsmebyname
      @knowsmebyname 4 роки тому +4

      Incredible isn’t it? My guess is the navy lied cuz they wanted or felt they needed the ship. Figuring once the ship was built they would find the money to arm it. Somebody should be in jail.

    • @grantrichardet6250
      @grantrichardet6250 4 роки тому +1

      Miles O'Brien the requirements kept changing that’s another reason those had issues

    • @milesobrien2694
      @milesobrien2694 4 роки тому +7

      @@grantrichardet6250 The Zumwalt catastrophe started in the late 1990's. The Navy personnel that were responsible for the design of this boat anchor have always been in the pocket of the MIC. Either direct appointments from the defence industry or promised lucrative jobs after their stint in the Navy. Look at the current Secretary of Defence: Esper came from Raytheon. The specifications kept changing to more expensive add ons and more impossible to fulfill expectations. Now that the Zumwalt is a complete failure the original purpose of the ship has changed from Marine Ground attack support to Destroyer Killer to $6 Billion broken toy.

    • @hansvithzeflammenwerfer9965
      @hansvithzeflammenwerfer9965 4 роки тому +1

      Well ONE B2 stealth bomber cost $21.000.000.000 to buy and $20.000.000 everyday/flight and that’s not.
      Even counting ammo/bombs or fuel?
      And that’s not ridiculous but the Zumwalt is?

    • @mr.m7791
      @mr.m7791 4 роки тому

      @@hansvithzeflammenwerfer9965 Who thinks like that? Who the fuck was talking about the stealth bomber? We're talking about this destroyer. Stop trying to manipulate the discussion.

  • @juliusdatuvillanueva2400
    @juliusdatuvillanueva2400 3 роки тому

    its. si nice. ships that ever. seen

  • @SUPERFLY-ky7yh
    @SUPERFLY-ky7yh 4 роки тому +1

    I'm sure Deni the narrator is a fine young intelligent American, whom would fight and diie alongside his American brothers and sisters to bring back the miniskirt. God Bless America.

    • @richardauchinleck1234
      @richardauchinleck1234 4 роки тому

      Harvey W, Deni may well be more patriotic than you think you are. BTW, try learning the difference btwn "who" and "whom".

  • @vivek181
    @vivek181 4 роки тому +7

    3:30 i think it can submerge like submarine they are hidding the secret

  • @tackyinbention6248
    @tackyinbention6248 4 роки тому +5

    This is the first us navy ship I have seen that has more than 1 main cannon in a long time

  • @Seagull780
    @Seagull780 3 роки тому

    Damn I'm suprised they even got it to work at all

  • @eurosensazion
    @eurosensazion 4 роки тому +17

    I don't think even the Navy wants this ship anymore. At least they got a futuristic design.

    • @georgebaggy
      @georgebaggy 4 роки тому +5

      It basically just turned into a technology testbed.

    • @hellfirekyun9226
      @hellfirekyun9226 4 роки тому

      All they make is to scare off people with its look.

    • @CH-pv2rz
      @CH-pv2rz 2 роки тому

      @Mrcoolguy no the Navy is installing the new hypersonic glide missiles in new launchers replacing the gun turrets…

  • @maori_Mcsouljah
    @maori_Mcsouljah 4 роки тому +7

    Zummwalt and the HMS Daring are fine looking ships

    • @Defense-TV
      @Defense-TV  4 роки тому +1

      RN Type 45 is strong and powerfull air defence destroyer ever build

    • @fidobeer4667
      @fidobeer4667 4 роки тому +1

      @@Defense-TV How does it perform when it attacked by its russian counterpart?

    • @beauchamphuberville1355
      @beauchamphuberville1355 4 роки тому +1

      @@fidobeer4667 well i guess the benefit is that it has fuel...thats a win.

    • @fidobeer4667
      @fidobeer4667 4 роки тому

      @@beauchamphuberville1355 Well. But I mean is, in terms of weaponry.

  • @brianlove8413
    @brianlove8413 4 роки тому +2

    "How the US Navy Zumwalt class Destroyer works"....it works, wow, new to me?

  • @BeingFireRetardant
    @BeingFireRetardant 4 роки тому +32

    All this guys teeth were apparently broken before he got on the microphone.

  • @ShelliLoop
    @ShelliLoop 4 роки тому +2

    Great design using discarded cargo crates. Sure....

  • @RomboutVersluijs
    @RomboutVersluijs 3 роки тому

    PS isnt the Marince Corps part of the navy, therefor that request isn't from without its own force? at 4:35

  • @scoutbaxter7046
    @scoutbaxter7046 2 роки тому +1

    I know the USS zumwalt is a destroyer but wouldn't it be technically a cruiser because of how big it is I don't know if that would classify it as a cruiser because of what it does but still it's a big ship you think they would consider a cruiser

  • @andrewjansen9702
    @andrewjansen9702 3 роки тому

    features: tumblehome wave piercing hull, armored deckhouse, peripherally mounted missile (vertical) launch tubes, anti radar contours, all electric propulsion, advanced gun system, LRAP, 57 mm retractable CIWS, iusw system, sonar array, integrated power system, turbine power generators, sensors, stern mounted landing pad, fully automated system,

    • @rogg8496
      @rogg8496 2 роки тому

      It has CWIS? Where?

  • @bjl1000
    @bjl1000 4 роки тому +1

    I think they should bring back the USS Monitor type ship from the cival war. It could be even more stealthy.

  • @bruceholmberg4927
    @bruceholmberg4927 4 роки тому +2

    Narrated very well.

  • @stephenmneedham
    @stephenmneedham 4 роки тому

    Looks like a big target.

  • @ramonmedina2160
    @ramonmedina2160 4 роки тому +2

    🚨✍SÍ pero la carga explosiva sigue abordo i el cañón eletromanetico no a sido instalado por problemas técnicos de corriente de cañón eletromanetico ✍🚦

  • @user-ds2dn7dx6h
    @user-ds2dn7dx6h 11 місяців тому

    Donde puedo comprar este modelo armable?

  • @vulcanus9384
    @vulcanus9384 4 роки тому

    Nice video, well made. But bro you need better audio. Your mic sounds muffled

  • @feelx92ger
    @feelx92ger 4 роки тому +2

    11:37 that's 8-12 GHz, not MHz, and 2-4 GHz respectively.

  • @agwhitaker
    @agwhitaker 4 роки тому +3

    7:10 - more lethal firepower than an Iowa class battleship - sez so right here.

    • @kerbodynamicx472
      @kerbodynamicx472 4 роки тому +1

      Andrew G. Whitaker if equipped with railguns

  • @public.public
    @public.public 4 роки тому +9

    Delivered flat packed. Made by IKEA...

  • @juandos380
    @juandos380 4 роки тому

    Reminds me of the nautilus from League of Extraordinary Gentlemen 😁

    • @salilpanwar6922
      @salilpanwar6922 2 роки тому

      yes the design would be a great submarine.... not a surface ship

  • @brown_note4710
    @brown_note4710 3 роки тому

    There was one of those in seattle

  • @nicholashackney2738
    @nicholashackney2738 2 роки тому

    We need redeck voice overs man lol

  • @shiekhwaleedmiral-protein2819
    @shiekhwaleedmiral-protein2819 3 роки тому

    Looks like an alien machine🙂

  • @pepper13111
    @pepper13111 3 роки тому

    Elmo ordered Agent Orange use as head operations in Vietnam, sadly his son died of deceased agent orange. Idea was good idea, in 1970 he took over ( as chief of staff) and spraying stopped

  • @hughyeckle4569
    @hughyeckle4569 4 роки тому +11

    Big Navy: makes a video entitled - How the U.S. Navy Zumwalt Class Destroyer works.
    Actual sailors: It doesn't. End of report. Next case.

    • @hughyeckle4569
      @hughyeckle4569 4 роки тому

      @@EmperorLionflame you ain't wrong. Lol.

  • @yogg6735
    @yogg6735 4 роки тому

    They should put Windows in the lower part and put lethal gun that can go in and out like the old pirate ships cannon

  • @mikebarbieri7125
    @mikebarbieri7125 2 роки тому

    Also addition heat given off by enemy bodies thermal

  • @kapilsharma-xz7os
    @kapilsharma-xz7os 4 роки тому +2

    This is the most advanced shit I have seen in internet ..No one can beat Zumwalt class

  • @SnepBlepVR
    @SnepBlepVR 3 роки тому

    This ship would make heavy weapons guy cry like baby

  • @semuapenuh
    @semuapenuh 4 роки тому +12

    The ship looks like a submarine that was on the surface. If you want stealth ships, make a lots of submarines.

    • @Galactipod
      @Galactipod 4 роки тому

      Submarines aren't ships. They're boats.

    • @alainarchambault2331
      @alainarchambault2331 4 роки тому

      Yeah, if you can sink the hull until just the deck is awash, that'll likely have the same effect.

  • @donbaxley5530
    @donbaxley5530 4 роки тому +2

    This video forgot to mention the ship is way overdue for deployment and way over on cost AS USUAL!

    • @setback4908
      @setback4908 4 роки тому +1

      To be expected when the usual military industrial tax payer parasites are involved. Money just disappears. The point for them is too make money off their clients.

  • @wowyzaoy
    @wowyzaoy 4 роки тому +2

    defending your allies? do you have any allies?

  • @gabrielmontufar5238
    @gabrielmontufar5238 4 роки тому +2

    Cool ship.
    Ghost Fleet needs to be made into a movie.
    So we can see this Zumwalt shoot a rail gun

  • @JOA-S
    @JOA-S 4 роки тому

    it's Big Brain time

  • @lefthook4878
    @lefthook4878 4 роки тому +2

    I really wish I could understand what you are saying. The inflections and garbling of consonants just makes it hard to hear and understand.

  • @the_beanzer
    @the_beanzer 4 роки тому

    the zumwalt should have a sister ship because it is such a great ship railguns degreed armour

    • @hellfirekyun9226
      @hellfirekyun9226 4 роки тому

      She already has a sister ship in construction.

  • @Laetu
    @Laetu 3 роки тому

    Regardless of its downsides- it do be looking sexy and sleek.

  • @robertmanrique1509
    @robertmanrique1509 3 роки тому

    ...The narrator's accent
    is NOT worthy of such a
    high-quality fightin' vessel.

  • @shanestewart1498
    @shanestewart1498 4 роки тому +36

    I can't even figure out what this guy is saying 😂

    • @alfreddelatourquipenche8287
      @alfreddelatourquipenche8287 4 роки тому

      Ship sexy because ship sexy because ship sexy because needed a video to publish.

    • @ShelliLoop
      @ShelliLoop 4 роки тому

      Shane Stewart - a Indian from India.

    • @edstyer2566
      @edstyer2566 4 роки тому +2

      Shane Stewart can’t understand his muffled voice

  • @Dnzjsjdk
    @Dnzjsjdk 4 роки тому +1

    Fun fact the name of the current captain of this ships is James Kirk. No joke

    • @bamagrad99
      @bamagrad99 4 роки тому +1

      He needs to be put on ice for about 5 years so he can take command of the new USS Enterprise when it is completed.

    • @f1reguy587
      @f1reguy587 3 роки тому

      I’m on the fence about this thing, I hope it’s not a bad ship, but just imagine how the new captain took the news that he would be running a ship like this, with minimal staff needed, stealthy... and unarmed... navy might appear to dislike him...

  • @RomboutVersluijs
    @RomboutVersluijs 3 роки тому

    Perhaps record the uaido more clear and lower video sound. its really hard to understand what your saying. Video has kind of low base and vocals are hard to stingish.

  • @benjammin2522
    @benjammin2522 4 роки тому

    ramming speed

  • @salilpanwar6922
    @salilpanwar6922 2 роки тому

    US Navy:- So can you mount artillery piece on the ship
    Designers:- say no more.... we got some 6 inchers laying around with ammunition way to expensive to use..

  • @hxydxnz
    @hxydxnz 2 роки тому

    Simple answer: Boat float, engine push.

  • @user-gi8in5ov8d
    @user-gi8in5ov8d 4 роки тому

    new usa heavy cruiser project

  • @28704joe
    @28704joe 4 роки тому +3

    They need to add one more crew member to this ship;
    someone to look out to prevent colliding with cargo ships.

  • @happyfox711
    @happyfox711 4 роки тому +2

    He really said: "...Raytheon became the National Team's prime mission systems interrogator..." LOL are they torturing systems now ?

    • @randypederson6271
      @randypederson6271 4 роки тому

      No it's 'enhanced" interrogation remember the talk we got about PC speech.

    • @happyfox711
      @happyfox711 4 роки тому

      @@randypederson6271 I think he tried to say integrator.

    • @happyfox711
      @happyfox711 4 роки тому

      @@randypederson6271 the enhanced interrogator, "the absolute truth-machine" if they don't have it, the probably will.