Supreme Court hears arguments on Donald Trump's immunity case

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 кві 2024
  • The Supreme Court is hearing a historic presidential immunity case on whether former President Donald Trump can be criminally prosecuted for his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss. This comes against the backdrop of a divisive 2024 presidential campaign as the U.S. Supreme Court considers the monumental question of whether a former president turned presumptive GOP nominee can be criminally prosecuted for his efforts to stay in power after the last election.
    #trump #supremecourt
    abcnews.go.com/Politics/supre...
    ---
    Subscribe to ABC News on UA-cam: abcnews.visitlink.me/59aJ1G
    Watch 24/7 coverage of breaking news and live events on ABC News Live: • LIVE: Latest News Head...
    Watch full episodes of World News Tonight with David Muir here: • ABC World News Tonight...
    Read ABC News reports online: abcnews.go.com
    ABC News Digital is your daily source of breaking national and world news, exclusive interviews and 24/7 live streaming coverage. ABC News is the home to the #1 evening newscast “World News Tonight” with David Muir, “Good Morning America,” “20/20,” “Nightline,” “This Week” with George Stephanopoulos, “ABC News Live Prime” with Linsey Davis, plus the daily news podcast “Start Here.”
    Connect with ABC News on social media:
    Facebook: / abcnews
    Instagram: / abcnews
    TikTok: / abcnews
    X: / abc
    Threads: www.threads.net/@abcnews
    LinkedIn: / abcnews

КОМЕНТАРІ • 35

  • @mmeis2389
    @mmeis2389 Місяць тому +9

    Loopholes were not intended in the founding fathers words. That was considered DisHonorable. We must have a "Honorable" determination of the presidents Actions.
    He by no reasonable determination did this with Honor, why cant these loophole lawyers be stopped with this angle.

    • @BunnyLang
      @BunnyLang Місяць тому +3

      Yes, seems a great deal of word dissecting to get to common sense.

  • @MichaelOfTroyWasHere
    @MichaelOfTroyWasHere Місяць тому +4

    The vocal fry on the state’s lawyer made this nearly unlistenable.

    • @gbeaver57
      @gbeaver57 Місяць тому +3

      That’s Trump’s lawyer.

    • @MichaelOfTroyWasHere
      @MichaelOfTroyWasHere Місяць тому +1

      @@gbeaver57 I’m not talking about the first guy. I’m talking about the second guy. The first guy was fine. The second guy I thought was a woman at first.

  • @BunnyLang
    @BunnyLang Місяць тому +1

    A personal gain, a private gain, are not presidential duties. Presidents are to honor our Constitution and make decisions with legal knowledge by those many in office within our government who have the authority to do so. Using outside attorney's to make governmental decisions is both personal gain and motive. It seems like a great deal to debate for what feels like common sense. Although, I suppose things must be written down precisely because some do not have sense.

  • @gbeaver57
    @gbeaver57 Місяць тому +3

    Can the president stage a coup!?
    Yes.

    • @betanusolosix
      @betanusolosix Місяць тому

      Did the President stage a coup?!
      No.

    • @gbeaver57
      @gbeaver57 Місяць тому

      @@betanusolosix that’s not at all what the case is about. However, Trump’s legal argument is that he indeed is allowed to stage a coup and murder whoever he wants.

  • @fs3579
    @fs3579 Місяць тому +1

    Lying to the public should be a Capital Crime!!!

  • @Acerthorn
    @Acerthorn Місяць тому

    7:22
    What's that latin phrase the justice is saying here?

    • @aeriose
      @aeriose Місяць тому +2

      "Malum in se" it refers to actions that are inherently immoral, regardless of whether they are prohibited by law (e.g. murder). "Malum prohibitum" is the other end of this coin which refers to actions that are only seen as wrong because they are illegal (e.g. jaywalking)

  • @user-hj5jn2pi8y
    @user-hj5jn2pi8y Місяць тому +2

    If you BRIBED the supreme Court $ 1 million each ...
    TRUMP would have them in his pocket

    • @betanusolosix
      @betanusolosix Місяць тому

      John Oliver offered Justice Thomas $1 million dollars and a $500k RV to retire….
      As far as Justices being bought for $1 million dollars, you’d have to bribe them with waaaaaaaaaaaaay more than that….These guys’ net worths probably jump substantially just like congress people and senators….Why take an illegal bribe when you can get filthy rich with insiders in the stock market “legally”….

  • @piku5637
    @piku5637 Місяць тому +3

    Normalize active unions and community based co-ops. Preserve democracy. There Ⓐre more of us☭🦄🌈✨then there are stinky billionaires and corrupt officials.

  • @nyanya.crystal15silver
    @nyanya.crystal15silver Місяць тому

    「👁️‍🗨️」
    「マリリンモンロー'ノーマ・ジーン、の生まれ変わりです」
    小さい時に頭打って「正しい判断ができない」の。 
    「変な仕事をさせてごめんなさい。」

  • @user-eg5it1bz6y
    @user-eg5it1bz6y Місяць тому

    At the end of the day...We need a STRONG PRESIDENT

  • @MrDennis052
    @MrDennis052 Місяць тому

    God bless America, Trump 2024

    • @jimako6
      @jimako6 Місяць тому

      Goes into cardiac arrest good riddens

  • @EddieMarcusEBJPM
    @EddieMarcusEBJPM Місяць тому

    ua-cam.com/video/pfHlnS7GSsY/v-deo.html POWER OVER LOVE

  • @judithdiehr9293
    @judithdiehr9293 Місяць тому +7

    The fact this fraud of a lawyer got 3 hours of bullshit out is amazing his boyfriend must hateistening to him that voice. The queerness shines through