A Theological Introduction to Neo-Calvinism

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 23

  • @JeffWildZug
    @JeffWildZug Рік тому +3

    Thank you all for the conversation. Camden - I come from the Roman Catholic tradition and would be interested in hearing more about Rahner and the Reform tradition.

    • @anselman3156
      @anselman3156 Рік тому +3

      Check out "Introduction to Karl Rahner Christ the Center episode 623". (I'm from Anglo-Catholic tradition, and, while disagreeing with aspects of Reformed theology, find these videos excellent, and especially good on orthodox Trinitarian theology).

    • @anselman3156
      @anselman3156 Рік тому +1

      p.s. Full episode on Rahner in their Great Thinkers series

  • @johntobey1558
    @johntobey1558 Рік тому

    Can you speak to Reformed streams with in the Evangelical Free Missionary Movement in the U.S. There are both Calvinists and Neo-Calvinists in our churches. We aren't Southern Presbyterian but would like to hear about how far tge influence of this Theology in low Church background like GARB and other Reforned Baptost Churches in New England and Southern New Jersey.

  • @johntobey1558
    @johntobey1558 Рік тому +1

    You are not allowed to have squabbles with Van Til at WTS.

  • @johntobey1558
    @johntobey1558 Рік тому +1

    Is Doug Wilson a neo-Calvinist? How about Meredith Kline?

    • @smithmusicstudies
      @smithmusicstudies 4 місяці тому

      I believe DW is more reconstructionist than neocal. Both are rooted in Kuyperian ideas.

  • @johntobey1558
    @johntobey1558 Рік тому

    Read Dynamics of Spiritual Life by Richard Lovelace Th.D. I.V. Press 1979

  • @παρεπίδημος
    @παρεπίδημος Рік тому

    I would probably use the word “elevate” rather than “perfects” because the latter suggests that creation is inherently imperfect or not entirely good. It would be easy to misunderstand that “grace” might be referring to something like the Roman Catholic doctrine of the donum superadditum if the word “perfects” is used. I prefer “grace restores and elevates nature” in order to stay consistently reformed.

  • @johntobey1558
    @johntobey1558 Рік тому +1

    HOW does neo-calvinism differ from Christian Nationalism?

  • @johntobey1558
    @johntobey1558 Рік тому

    Maybe it should not be developed because it lacks a Social ethic and a fully developed ecclesiology, hermeneutic or social ethic.

  • @anthonyj.castellitto9103
    @anthonyj.castellitto9103 Рік тому +1

    I thought neoCalvinism was YRR.

    • @chrismathew2295
      @chrismathew2295 Рік тому

      YRR is "New Calvinism", not "neo-Calvinism." Different things.

    • @truthseeker5698
      @truthseeker5698 2 місяці тому

      No matter the name or differences, they both have the Satan spirit sustaining them.

  • @Scott_Terry
    @Scott_Terry Місяць тому

    How much is the CIA paying theologians to give flaccid takes on controversial figures?
    I can tell everyone Rutherford loved the king and John Knox would have us obey establishment.
    "Give up your rights ye Kuyperians..." :D

  • @JohnQPublic11
    @JohnQPublic11 Рік тому +3

    This is pretty funny since Calvinist can't stand, hate, can't get along with any non-Calvinist professing Christian and here you guys are wanting to get along with atheists' when you can't even get along with other Christians.

    • @ggggaaaa1317
      @ggggaaaa1317 Рік тому +6

      Who hurt you?

    • @johntobey1558
      @johntobey1558 Рік тому

      Probably a ministry leader who mistook orthodoxy for orthopraxy. A call for live orthodoxy.

    • @dgbx6
      @dgbx6 6 місяців тому +1

      Bingo! Great observation. The sleazy personal attacks to your comment simply proves your point.

    • @Wallachia_place0
      @Wallachia_place0 5 місяців тому

      OFC anti-Calvinists Ad Hominem and strawman

  • @josephchin3815
    @josephchin3815 Рік тому +1

    first