Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

KSP: Establishing Geostationary Kerbin Relays AND Mun + Minmus relays in 1 launch!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 бер 2018
  • The people of twitter hath spoken, I present ye with a guide/playthrough for establishing relays at Kerbin, Minmus and Mun in 1 launch, with the Kerbin and Minmus ones being synchronous (aka "geostationary" - though that term technically only applies to Earth)
    Twitter............................► / matt_lowne
    Patreon...........................►goo.gl/lLDt79
    Discord............................► / discord
    Second channel..............►goo.gl/cww3Ik
    Mods:
    Gameplay: Kerbal Engineer Redux; Better Time Warp; Camera Tools
    Synchronous orbit calculator:
    www.skyrender.net/ksp_sync_cal...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 707

  • @victorcalderon4416
    @victorcalderon4416 4 роки тому +867

    Matt: puts sattelite into orbit
    me: puts an rtg, a battery, and a deployable antenna on all my rocket stages and turn my debri into sattelites

  • @BALDO3
    @BALDO3 4 роки тому +148

    Matt: launches 3 big satellites and 6 medium satellites in 1 launch and around 3 different celestial bodies
    Me: launch a single satellites that looks like a trash can in a random orbit around Kerbin using a rocket bigger than the Saturn V

    • @arthurlunar7835
      @arthurlunar7835 2 роки тому +6

      Underrated, lol

    • @BALDO3
      @BALDO3 2 роки тому +3

      @@arthurlunar7835 The power of the trash can 💪

    • @arthurlunar7835
      @arthurlunar7835 2 роки тому +4

      @@BALDO3 i can't even go to orbit in career mode,so i only play sandbox lol i am trash

    • @dezt538
      @dezt538 2 роки тому +3

      @@arthurlunar7835 We've all been there, keep trying and going forward. I am also quite bad in comparison to the big minds.

    • @theforgottensandwich1770
      @theforgottensandwich1770 Рік тому

      Altgr+F12

  • @EvelynH-tj1qt
    @EvelynH-tj1qt 6 років тому +124

    *trying to get a perfectly circular orbit* Jebediah:*blows air through straw*

    • @granthuffmanreal
      @granthuffmanreal 2 роки тому +7

      R.I.P jeb, his pilot on the mission has killed him

    • @MisterRelatable
      @MisterRelatable Рік тому +1

      @@granthuffmanreal shutters up meowsters!

  • @jemuelmongado5030
    @jemuelmongado5030 5 років тому +309

    In my Career save, I just do every satellite contract I get. Basically the private sector funds my swarm of relay satellites.

    • @celtoucan4956
      @celtoucan4956 4 роки тому +26

      I do that too. Good profits and it also has a little bit of use

    • @raaston9761
      @raaston9761 4 роки тому +9

      @@celtoucan4956 i do the same to the point that i have to activaly avoid all my satilites good news is i will nevere be out of range for data tranmission

    • @mrbouncelol
      @mrbouncelol 3 роки тому +14

      @@raaston9761 What dude there's an infinitesimally small chance you would hit your own satellite even with thousands, there's a calculator somewhere for this lol

    • @pumpkin8222
      @pumpkin8222 3 роки тому +2

      I put realy antenia on my debri, ez

    • @vendoaguasa5lucas930
      @vendoaguasa5lucas930 3 роки тому

      @@mrbouncelol maybe he has like 10000 relays on orbit lol

  • @InventorZahran
    @InventorZahran 4 роки тому +790

    If Kerbals call their moon "the Mun", then shouldn't their sun be called "the Soon"?

  • @ZVLIAN
    @ZVLIAN 6 років тому +339

    My network is just 60 sattelites (Brought by ssto) in random inclined orbits ... Works very well

    • @Tuned_Rockets
      @Tuned_Rockets 6 років тому +31

      watch out for kessler syndrome

    • @RAFMnBgaming
      @RAFMnBgaming 6 років тому +90

      I'm pretty sure there's a few real satellite networks that follow that philosophy. Well not random orbits but the whole "Have so many that there's bound to be one around" thing. My dad's boat's GPS connnects to something that does something along those lines.

    • @ZVLIAN
      @ZVLIAN 6 років тому +4

      johnetes already got it ;)

    • @connormauk3210
      @connormauk3210 6 років тому +59

      The tried and true method of just throwing resources at the problem until it goes away

    • @Oscar1618033
      @Oscar1618033 5 років тому +32

      I usually play with remote tech, a few years ago there was only one omnidirectional antenna that won't break in the atmosphere, it had only 500km range and I wanted complete surface coverage.
      After some heavy math I found that the best solution was a three orbit network (0°, 60°, -60°) with 8 satellite each at about 221km of height.
      I deployed them with three launches of an SRB-fisrt-stage rocket to make it cheaper. It worked like a charm, but to this day I can't replicate that success.
      It was awesome.

  • @DanSher
    @DanSher 5 років тому +28

    you can also switch to surface mode and if it`s = 0 m/s -you`re synchronous
    but it`s hard to do
    or you can take a calculator

  • @Phroggster
    @Phroggster 6 років тому +271

    Keostationary is totally the word that you're looking for, unless you're using some odd planet pack or RSS...

    • @nexusxe
      @nexusxe 6 років тому +11

      latt mowne begone

    • @LukeRen-rl4yv
      @LukeRen-rl4yv 6 років тому +2

      look! its matt mowne!

    • @Cby0530
      @Cby0530 5 років тому +2

      Kerstationary

    • @XMeK
      @XMeK 5 років тому +8

      @@Cby0530 It's Keo... Ancient Kreek for Kerbin. :-)

    • @user-lg8qv6qz2w
      @user-lg8qv6qz2w 4 роки тому +5

      Kerbostationary

  • @the_v4ultdweller753
    @the_v4ultdweller753 6 років тому +106

    Matt, your videos are so well made, at the same fun to watch and good for new players....Love ur videos Matt =)

  • @user-mz3om1fc5g
    @user-mz3om1fc5g 6 років тому +58

    I always get my popcorn ready before watching Matt's ksp video

  • @ryanm.191
    @ryanm.191 6 років тому +456

    I use you for ksp inspiration because I’m terrible at the game.

    • @FREDgaming-qf2pz
      @FREDgaming-qf2pz 5 років тому +7

      a bottle of goo there’s an in game tutorial that explains how to do it

    • @SK-zl6sl
      @SK-zl6sl 5 років тому +5

      Ryan M. Aren’t you an aerospace engineer?

    • @canaDavid1
      @canaDavid1 5 років тому +8

      I proably suck more than you...
      I dont have the game

    • @untitledgoose6570
      @untitledgoose6570 5 років тому

      I have had the game for about a month now and I just got a satellite in space

    • @fallingcupcake4103
      @fallingcupcake4103 5 років тому

      Same here

  • @tomporter8849
    @tomporter8849 Рік тому +4

    IMO The most efficient way to establish a Kerbin-system relay-network is to place two around Minmus and then place another in the same Kerbin-orbit as Minmus but 180 degrees apart.
    That way, at least one relay will always be visible, no matter where you are. Even on the far-side of the Mun, as the Mun orbits inside Minmus.
    It's the same thing with Jool; you don't need relays around every moon. Just put 3 equally-spaced relays in a very high orbit around Jool (I used a distance of 2Gm) so that one is always in the sky; anywhere, on any Jool moon.

  • @josephhaas7413
    @josephhaas7413 5 років тому +6

    The sight at 10:00 tantalizes me to no end. The symmetry is real. Well done!

  • @mikaxms
    @mikaxms 6 років тому +48

    If you activate "interstage nodes" for your faring, you don't have to build a complex structure with I-beams for multiple payloads within one faring.

    • @Atlessa
      @Atlessa 6 років тому

      How exactly do I use that? I don't see any difference when I activate that node...

    • @alexsiemers7898
      @alexsiemers7898 6 років тому +1

      Pyrrha Nikos when you pick up a part with node attachments, a bunch will show up inside the fairing.

    • @MattLowne
      @MattLowne  6 років тому +18

      Truss structure isn't tall enough for this payload though, otherwise I would have done this!

    • @Exodon2020
      @Exodon2020 6 років тому +4

      I worked around this by installing multiple Fairing bases but only built one Fairing structure around it.

  • @devon5714
    @devon5714 5 років тому +49

    "i strive to make this series at least slightly realistic."
    15:08

  • @ethanli2045
    @ethanli2045 6 років тому +251

    Challenge!: Go through the Mun Arch from orbit!

    • @ZVLIAN
      @ZVLIAN 6 років тому +5

      Butter Bread nice challenger liked it

    • @schiefer1103
      @schiefer1103 6 років тому +4

      Erik Bakker doesn't have to be stable, probably going to have to be burned all the time to survive, although I ain't the challenger so I am just guessing...

    • @ethanli2045
      @ethanli2045 6 років тому +2

      Is that even possible?

    • @aartemiswhite
      @aartemiswhite 6 років тому +29

      A stable orbit through the arch is impossible since its not on the equator. It will just move out of possition by the next orbit.

    • @ZVLIAN
      @ZVLIAN 6 років тому

      Butter Bread yes

  • @ihaveapsr7
    @ihaveapsr7 4 роки тому +6

    Matt: *makes a relay to get more communication*
    Me: duna rover with seats take it or leave it

  • @R3aper9048
    @R3aper9048 4 роки тому +5

    "..So there are no survivors." Mechjeb: Screaming

  • @flazethyhero698
    @flazethyhero698 6 років тому +1

    Just found your channel by this series, I love it, keep going!

  • @hantront
    @hantront 5 років тому +3

    I went into this thinking "What the hell, this shit is too complicated" but after a couple of minutes i actually came around and now i understand it very well. Thank you.

  • @spiritwolf5792
    @spiritwolf5792 5 років тому +21

    (Incorrect: Geosynchronous matches the speed but is offset of the equator.
    Geostationary is when it's right on the equator, so the satellite appears to be still from the ground.)

    • @josephdavison4189
      @josephdavison4189 3 роки тому +2

      Why is there parentheses

    • @spiritwolf5792
      @spiritwolf5792 3 роки тому

      @@josephdavison4189
      it was meant to be a sort of side-note lol

  • @Scp--T
    @Scp--T 5 років тому +1

    Thanks Matt! You gave me a huge idea for a little change with my Mun colony base that i decided to construct over a few lunches now insted of putting an aray of random useless communication panels on surface i would multitask and make the aray 2 around Mun and 2 around Minmus for a later project as sataliets (and yeah im a begginer but i had already achived interplanetary travel and im just setting up random bases everywhere cause thats neat)

  • @tolga1cool
    @tolga1cool 6 років тому +24

    Dude. Yesterday I rewatched your first video to get the heights for the sattalites. And today you upload this.

  • @gigamut11b86
    @gigamut11b86 6 років тому +57

    Sweet...I always seem to learn something new from your video's.
    Love your vid's...keep up the great work
    I hope you have a great day & be safe.

    • @gigamut11b86
      @gigamut11b86 6 років тому

      I knew it, I knew it...I need to double up on my tin foil supply..........lol

  • @dwarvenmoray
    @dwarvenmoray 6 років тому +252

    Next video, can you make nuclear shuttle to wherever. Just think it wiuld be cool. Anyway, thank you for not killing me & saving me, love your videos👍

    • @Exodon2020
      @Exodon2020 6 років тому +20

      Wait, I did send you to Duna some weeks ago, didn't I?

    • @jebediahkerman4251
      @jebediahkerman4251 6 років тому +19

      Wernher von Kerman what's going on here
      Where's my supplies u promised??
      I'm starving

    • @Exodon2020
      @Exodon2020 6 років тому +16

      Oh shit, I knew I've forgotten something...

    • @certifiedpossum8655
      @certifiedpossum8655 6 років тому +3

      So are you Rick or Jeb?

    • @jebediahkerman4251
      @jebediahkerman4251 6 років тому +6

      Wernher von Kerman oh and also
      Have you gone into designing reusable rocket boosters while I'm at Duna?

  • @americanpyschoenthusiast6323
    @americanpyschoenthusiast6323 6 років тому

    This is the one KSP channel that never fails to amaze me!

  • @cactus-xj6hm
    @cactus-xj6hm 6 років тому +21

    Very nice video, thank you for this information.

  • @bundy241241
    @bundy241241 5 років тому +1

    long time viewer, videos are getting better and better :)

  • @Kilroyan
    @Kilroyan 6 років тому +5

    awesome video!

  • @DarkDestinybyC
    @DarkDestinybyC 6 років тому +32

    Nice ! now i know more about this . Thank you !

    • @DarkDestinybyC
      @DarkDestinybyC 6 років тому +1

      Yay Matt Lowne loved my comment , now i can die in peace...

    • @DarkDestinybyC
      @DarkDestinybyC 6 років тому +1

      latt mowne :)))

  • @greenetomphson6164
    @greenetomphson6164 5 років тому +4

    Kennedy center just announced that they're putting on "Matt Lowne's relay networks" in 2020

  • @redsubmarine652
    @redsubmarine652 6 років тому +25

    You are my favorite carbon based life form

  • @deviama1
    @deviama1 6 років тому

    Ooh! I can't wait to watch this! I've been dying to know how to do this for awhile.

  • @justanotheryoutubechannel
    @justanotheryoutubechannel 6 років тому +1

    Hey! I saw that poll on Twitter! Also, nice video!

  • @osotanuki3359
    @osotanuki3359 4 роки тому +11

    "Some of the new parts from Making History"
    Dang, this is pretty old

    • @Glub009
      @Glub009 Місяць тому +1

      yeah lmao

  • @kerbonautics5217
    @kerbonautics5217 6 років тому +422

    I have a much easier way of getting to geostationary orbit, just stay on the surface, or if you really want to, use a helicopter.

    • @iami3rian394
      @iami3rian394 6 років тому +57

      latt mowne I mean, you are, technically a jump is an orbit, the periapsis is just very shallow inside the ground. A _stable_ orbit, that's a totally different animal.

    • @kerbonautics5217
      @kerbonautics5217 6 років тому +10

      latt mowne you're circling around the planet

    • @Zurtron
      @Zurtron 6 років тому +1

      I mean I guess, #lifehacksepisode99999999

    • @vali69
      @vali69 5 років тому +10

      And the nobel prize goes to...

    • @ichspiellp3685
      @ichspiellp3685 4 роки тому +2

      I think only a finished circle (that doesn't go through the planet) counts as an orbit, but I'm not sure

  • @KryoNaut
    @KryoNaut 6 років тому +14

    You are the best man !

    • @KryoNaut
      @KryoNaut 6 років тому +1

      Thanks for the like man !

  • @trianglesqrt2576
    @trianglesqrt2576 6 років тому +15

    i`m using the truss structure option of the fairings for that, pretty handy

    • @ZVLIAN
      @ZVLIAN 6 років тому

      trianglesqrt yes thats ULTRA Handy i love that

    • @MattLowne
      @MattLowne  6 років тому +4

      The fairing truss structure isn't tall enough for this payload though

  • @danielv5825
    @danielv5825 4 роки тому +1

    First time I set up a relay network, I got everything correct to two decimal places. Only a couple of years later in game time, I lost control of a Minmus fuel tanker because it had no communications - my three satellites were 'clumped' on one half of the moon.
    Since then, I set everything up to "close enough", then save file hack everything to "exact."

  • @IcedDragon420
    @IcedDragon420 6 років тому +1

    Great video i love it please keep this up we love it.

  • @TheNoodlyAppendage
    @TheNoodlyAppendage 5 років тому +2

    3 is the minimum for equatorial coverage, btu to include the polar areas you need 3 more in a polar orbit. Those can be in lower orbits, since they dont need to be stationary.

  • @franksanteugini4102
    @franksanteugini4102 6 років тому

    matt lowne, i love your videos!

  • @barbarawittmann2728
    @barbarawittmann2728 6 років тому +8

    im on console and my approach to this is to be perfectly geostationary where everything is right
    not really i just put so many sattelites into orbit that im bound to have at least one link

  • @RAFMnBgaming
    @RAFMnBgaming 6 років тому

    I remember trying to make a low minmus orbit space station when docking was first added. Yeah, doing precise burns on minmus is fun.

  • @aubudjdhueh4501
    @aubudjdhueh4501 6 років тому +2

    I like it,good!

  • @virtual2288
    @virtual2288 5 років тому +2

    i like the vanguard logo that you made ;)

  • @DSBsky77
    @DSBsky77 Рік тому

    Such a great game.. Makes me want to hop back in. :D

  • @collisw8302
    @collisw8302 4 роки тому +3

    Great video! Meanwhile I’m struggling to land Jeb on the Mun without him meeting his fiery demise..

  • @ecogreen123
    @ecogreen123 5 років тому +3

    1:45 when you realize that one of your rockets can fit into his rocket XD

  • @rjstone1858
    @rjstone1858 6 років тому

    I'd like to see a series of you colonizing the moon's of kerbin

  • @jacobshaw808
    @jacobshaw808 4 роки тому

    What I've found is the 2G relays are sufficient for all the moons and 15G are perfect for orbit around the main planet. For my kerbin constellation, I replaced one of the relays with a mega-relay (4 100G's, so the total power is ~282G); this mega-relay is placed in geostationary orbit directly opposite the tracking center. That way, regardless where we are in the solar system, our 15G relays orbiting the main planet have a comm link to either the 250G tracking center or the 282G mega-relay. These 15G relays can then beam the signal to the surrounding moons. If I were really picky, I could replace the other two 15Gs around kerbin with 282G mega relays (in case the moon or minmus or sun were blocking the signal from reaching another planet) but it works pretty well.

    • @jacobshaw808
      @jacobshaw808 4 роки тому

      I realize for dres, jool, and eeloo, you'll need 100G relays around the planet, but I haven't been there yet :)

  • @jiggermole
    @jiggermole 6 років тому

    Usually i do smaller relay says in equatorial orbits and then as i get bigger relays deploy them in a hughly eliptical polar orbit. On other planets outside of kerbin i use a polar relay with small eqatorials for rover control.

  • @monsterbash9758
    @monsterbash9758 6 років тому

    I just started playing last night. It has been a while since I've played a game that was so complex. Garry's Mod doesn't have to be complex but it was the way I played it, lol. Tracking turrets, tracking rockets, robots that automatically track down players and murder them, cars that drive on walls. One thing I couldn't make is a hovercar using vector thrusters instead of hoverballs, which don't really allow for rolling or pitching.

  • @TheKerbalScientist
    @TheKerbalScientist 6 років тому

    @mattlowne A synchronous orbit is just it matches the rotational period of an object, a stationary orbit is it matches the rotational period and is on its equatorial line

  • @joshdarroch
    @joshdarroch 6 років тому +2

    Hi love your videos.

  • @nightwolf7231
    @nightwolf7231 Рік тому +1

    10:26 "probably not that interesting to watch from a viewer standpoint" yeah right man I see how it is lol. Love your videos current and old!

  • @chriswoodend2036
    @chriswoodend2036 6 років тому

    Very enjoyable. Always good to end a mission with a viking funeral.

  • @nosmirck
    @nosmirck 6 років тому

    When I do my stationary satellite array, I use 2 extra satellites that go over the poles, opposite to each other in their orbits, very eccentric (3M Km ap, 80KM pe) so I always have coverage of any point on the surface of Kerbin (since purely equatorial will not cover the poles)

  • @mwethereld
    @mwethereld Рік тому

    i just used a head of random inclined orbits around the Mun to avoid any collisions. Works well enough for my dumb arse. Also have a relay at each major orbital body like Duna, Jool, Moho, Eve, but havent setup one at Eeloo yet. Thats my next project so i can send a probe/rover. Im very new to KSP but love it so far

  • @Rikard_Nilsson
    @Rikard_Nilsson 4 роки тому +4

    Now I'm kinda wondering if you can make a "number 8" orbit between Kerbin and the Mun somehow... or if that would just become a gravity slingshot by default.

  • @danilocoelho9915
    @danilocoelho9915 6 років тому +1

    I would love to see a heavily modded series from you. Using life support and MkS.

  • @maxchumka
    @maxchumka 6 років тому +8

    Matt, where were you few days ago, when I was making relay and had to google a lot of information about geosynchronous orbits, instead of getting if from one nice video! :angryface:

  • @jellovis
    @jellovis Рік тому

    Superrrrrr gemacht

  • @waylandsmith
    @waylandsmith 4 роки тому +1

    Btw, latest versions of KSP now include much of the functionality of Kerbal Engineer (and Precise Node without mods.

  • @Roobie-Roo
    @Roobie-Roo 6 років тому

    Love your videos matt, started play ksp cause of your smart vids. Could you make a relay for the Jool system in 2 launches?

  • @ryanelger07
    @ryanelger07 6 років тому

    This reminds me I need to sort out my RemoteTech network. Orbits are a mess as I was very hasty.
    Remote Tech is great but blimey it's the bane of my KSP life sometimes and I wish I'd stuck with commnet :D

  • @krakenite8444
    @krakenite8444 4 роки тому +1

    i love seeing those triangulations

  • @DavidDuMusic
    @DavidDuMusic 6 років тому

    you're like the god of kerbal
    I can't even build my own mun lander

  • @supermendi0078
    @supermendi0078 5 років тому

    I actually made an Excel document where I can calculate the synchronous orbit radius, the amount of time the satellite will be on the dark side of the planet (and therefore how much battery it’ll need) and also the encounter distance between the satellites of the synchronous network to use the maneuver planner to properly put each one in place. All of this is calculated pretty much with the distance of the planet to the star it orbits (Kerbol), the radius of the planet and its mass. I’m also working on expanding this “program” to include any possible eclipses the satellite might go through eventually and so far all the math seems correct and I’m really proud of it. I also included these calculations for a spacecraft orbiting a satellite body such as the Mün, but unless we’re talking about orbiting Laythe the difference of time seems rather small.

  • @pastashack3517
    @pastashack3517 5 років тому

    You don't need to get the orbital apsides exactly to three decimal places. The important thing is that the periods match; if the eccentricities are a little off, the satellites will librate slightly, but they'll all stay in the same formation.

  • @GeomancerHT
    @GeomancerHT 5 років тому

    You know you have played so much KPS when you keep trying to move the camera with your mouse on a KSP UA-cam video every 5 minutes you see something interesting on screen XD

  • @Freak80MC
    @Freak80MC Рік тому

    I'm currently building a Minmus base and just using the portion that lands the base modules, I'm using those as my Minmus relays, I fly them back up and place them in the same orbit and try to match the Pe, Ap, inclination, and period. Is better than just wasting them right afterwards heh

  • @alexpfw9896
    @alexpfw9896 6 років тому

    I have an accidental Comsat, I had one in orbit which I was trying to fix, but it exploded and left the dish behind, but it still works so that’s cool

  • @RAFMnBgaming
    @RAFMnBgaming 6 років тому +5

    You can work out orbital period in stock by just making a manouever node directly behind you and seeing how long it is till that immediately. Not very accurate though.

  • @jamesgarlick4573
    @jamesgarlick4573 5 років тому

    You should find uses for spent parts you don't need anymore. Like the deployment rocket could've been used to go extra stellar as a probe (if the game allows that) or use it as part of a station/base if possible

  • @dashiellrogers9192
    @dashiellrogers9192 6 років тому +8

    Wouldn't a synchronous orbit around the Mun just be a satellite on the exact same orbit as the Mun but just a little ahead or behind its sphere of influence? Since its tidally locked to Kerbin, it would always face the same side of the Mun right?

    • @Zurtron
      @Zurtron 6 років тому +3

      Well no, a synchronous orbit around the moon would just be a orbit the same height as Kerbin which would crash into Kerbin so it's impossible unlesssssss.......... No it is possible, ignore everything I said

    • @99Luftballonism
      @99Luftballonism 5 років тому

      The thing is the orbital period would change, so then the Mun and the satellite would drift

    • @OtherDalfite
      @OtherDalfite 5 років тому +1

      @@99Luftballonism so long as the orbits are pretty much perfectly matched you will stay pretty much at a fixed distance from the mun

    • @justinc2633
      @justinc2633 5 років тому

      @@Zurtron using our moon you would need an orbit with an orbital period of 28 days since that its rotational period, this would give you an orbital speed of ~240m/s and 90000km
      there is no special phenomena with a lunar orbit like everyone in this thread seems to think
      also to sum up the OP's question, no thats not how it works

  • @Leifdoe
    @Leifdoe 5 років тому

    3:13 amazing

  • @JU-lo8kt
    @JU-lo8kt 6 років тому +1

    Hey matt, i have a question. how do you get your wheels perfectly straight on your planes/STTOs? whenever i make one it always goes in a random direction..

  • @zekeslavens
    @zekeslavens 6 років тому

    I did this a while ago in my save of 14 years, didn't care too much about the exact numbers they're still very closely aligned so dont worry to much about the details,

  • @Knaecketoast
    @Knaecketoast 6 років тому

    i need this savegame! :D

  • @psiadow
    @psiadow 5 років тому +1

    You missed an opportunity for Science!™
    I always keep my relay transfer vehicles in orbit to use them as seismic impacters at a later date.

  • @sethgrisham1095
    @sethgrisham1095 6 років тому

    The initial part of the reentry of the mothership sounded like microwave popcorn.

  • @GileadMaerlyn
    @GileadMaerlyn 6 років тому +1

    Well, thanks to your video, I have been able to set a network of 3 satellites at 1000km from Kerbin, forming an equilateral triangle!
    Thank you. It took me nearly 3 hours though xD

  • @twitchy.mp3
    @twitchy.mp3 4 місяці тому

    This was before you narrated fast I like it

  • @ryanburbo1405
    @ryanburbo1405 3 роки тому

    This man doing starlink

  • @Amunra861
    @Amunra861 2 роки тому

    Hey Matt...idk if youll see this comment but i love your videos. I just got the game last week and its hard with so much content out there to find things im looking for when i dont know their names...
    The shuttle that you are ferrying these sattelites around in. Do you have a build video for it? I have no idea what its called or how to even look for it, but its a cool delivery system and id like to try it haha!
    Love your work

  • @jantarada1
    @jantarada1 5 років тому

    Nice song

  • @obelawe2864
    @obelawe2864 6 років тому

    Matt could you make the old shuttle with the current version would love to see that and using it deploying sats

  • @jexter6578
    @jexter6578 6 років тому

    Well ,whenever I use small joints for staging the payload start wobbling and comes out from fairing and crash the rocket

  • @robertw6894
    @robertw6894 5 років тому

    You should get RealPlume. The exhaust plumes may seem weird at first, but its realistic, and it is my FAVORITE mod. It also makes the spounds for the engines less obnoxious.

  • @jyrgenruut
    @jyrgenruut 5 років тому

    I finally picked up ksp, and I did ramp up quite a few of the difficulty settings somewhat (I believe 70% pay, 70% reputation, and 130% entry heating; which I now realize are probably way too easy...); I never even left the kerbin system yet, but I constructed a science vessel to go to all planets, while having a drone or a lander with an engineer mine and make fuel for the mothership... meaning I will be able to "finish" the game after one, extremely long, self-imposed mission. However, I did realize that there may be a problem with connecting to Kerbin at times... especially with those really low-data transfer rates from the outer planets; as such, I think this system requires an additional 2 satellites on near perfect polar orbits. That would get rid of the possibly pesky interference from the mun and minmus; which is something I am afraid of atm...

  • @thomaswijgerse723
    @thomaswijgerse723 6 років тому

    Slight correction.
    Geostationary and geosynchronous orbits both have an orbital period of 24 hours, only geostationary orbits are also equatorial so they appear stationary, geosynchronous orbits do not appear stationary, but they will appear back at the exact same spot after every 24 hours.
    Geo stands for earth
    So a stationary orbit around the moon would be (moon prefix) stationary
    Same goes for synchronous.
    But both orbits are possible around any planet/moon.

    • @thomaswijgerse723
      @thomaswijgerse723 6 років тому

      latt mowne fair point.
      Although same would go for synchronous right?

  • @beatrax8006
    @beatrax8006 6 років тому

    Im too gonna start a ksp channel once i reach Toronto next year!

  • @binarysmile
    @binarysmile 6 років тому

    Any good guides to the parts/tools/design principles for the construction phase for this kind of satellite deployer?

  • @ignaciogrosso6942
    @ignaciogrosso6942 6 років тому

    Awesome! Why don't you make a video showing how to establish a relay network for the other planets? I mean, I guess it would require to put some satellites in kerbol orbit, and I don't know where to put them. Thanks!

  • @trickhatgaming9699
    @trickhatgaming9699 5 років тому

    Do you have a list of mods that you use and how to install them? Thanks love the videos!

  • @BlaBoy17
    @BlaBoy17 3 роки тому

    The reason why I watch his videos: he is cool

  • @MochiClips
    @MochiClips 9 місяців тому

    Is there any advantage for a synchronous orbit if a non-synchronous orbit has complete coverage? Or is it just for the aesthetics? 🤔

  • @5Puff
    @5Puff 6 років тому

    kewl!!

  • @andrewkvk1707
    @andrewkvk1707 5 років тому

    Isn't the height of your orbit calculated specifically for an equatorial orbit? Anything off from the equator would slow your speed relative to the plane of kerbins rotation, right?