@@MatthewSomethingOrOther how do you determine what is or is not kid appropriate? Is a book which tells the story of a kid getting anally raped “kid appropriate”?
@@MrFineWhiteWine Depends on the age of the kids, for a 17 year old probably not, for a 6 year old it’s absolutely inappropriate. However, we aren’t talking about a book that has someone getting abused, we’re talking about material that is obviously pornographic.
@@Stan_Herman idk about you but I read the kite runner in 7th grade. And the outsiders which features a brutal stabbing in 6th. This whole issue is sooooo overblown imo.
The last stat I saw on women in the US getting abortions showed the average income of women that got abortions and their income was far higher than what I assumed it would with the argument of not being able to afford the child being such a common argument. After seeing the average income, it basically proved that the vast amount of abortions are out of convenience and not wanting to take responsibility for one’s actions and that the financial argument was absolutely not the #1 reason, even though that seems to be to go-to argument for the people that are pro-eliminating the life of others. They want to be able to take the life of others, but don’t you dare take their life. They are far too important to be removed from this lovely place.
@@ogliberty5486 the law is a precise endeavor. When we are discussing legality and how to legislate something, discussing how that legislation impacts the edge cases is important.
@MrFineWhiteWine except on this topic where edge cases are completely irrelevant since every single place where they ban that activity has exceptions for exactly those edge cases.
@@MrFineWhiteWine The law in the US is not a precise endeavor. We have common law. Laws are written, and then refined over years and decades through precedent. That's not how law works in the US. Bills don't have to be perfect, courts set precedent which changes how laws are enforced.
@@quagmoe7879Yeah so helicopter parenting like that doesn’t work for the internet. You’re going to produce a kid that is leagues behind in understanding how to navigate the largest resource humans have.
@@CosmicAnimalClan I’m going to produce a sane and normal kid you mean. The internet is not that important in reality and it’s telling that you think it is. All it does is poison young people’s minds, I’ve seen it over and over again. I grew up without internet access until I was about 15/16 and that’s how it should be for everyone. There’s no reason a child should be browsing the internet, period. And they’ll figure out how the internet works, they don’t need to use it from a young age to understand how it works so that’s just a very bizarre and nonsensical argument to make.
These children aren't destined to be in a struggling family that are less than ideal to raise a child in... Adoption is an option and should be considered.
@@gloriousapplebees Taylor’s whole view is premised on the idea that we value all “life” completely equally from the point of conception to natural death. Its just not true and everyone innately knows it. I can guarantee if Taylor was in a burning building, next to him there is a fridge with 100 conceived zygotes and 1 6 month old baby in a stroller, he could only save the baby or the fridge, 100 out of 100 times he’s saving the baby. Everyone innately knows that conceived zygotes aren’t the same level of “life”
@@MrFineWhiteWine okay, yeah probably. Does this tie into adoption VS abortion at all or? I'm not even making a pro one or the other comment, just that no one brings up adoption as an option and it absolutely is.
@@gloriousapplebees yes. Because adoption doesn’t solve the issue of carrying the pregnancy to term. Adoption is a solution when the issue is parenthood, not pregnancy. Thats a big difference. Presenting adoption as a replacement for abortion isn’t valid because it’s not fixing the same problem.
@@MrFineWhiteWine you're moving the goal post. It absolutely is a parenthood issue when we're talking about the point of families wanting to abort a pregnancy because they can't handle caring for a child. This is the only thing I'm talking about, adoption is an option and it wasn't mentioned and often isn't in the conversation but absolutely should be.
@@gloriousapplebees when discussing the economic impact it’s not just about the impact of raising a child, it’s the impact of pregnancy. Driftor didn’t adequately express that but it doesn’t make it any less true to the consecration as a whole.
If we had to fight a war right now with an army of nothing but either woodys, filthy robots, or driftors our only chance would be the militia of woodys. Hes the idiot of the show but he still represents america in some ways. People like filthy and driftor barely have a solidified gender
a politician that doesn’t do anything is better than any politician we’ve ever had they aren’t helping you by passing new legislation, you are deranged
Taylor can exaggerate, and so can woody- the difference is that Taylor exaggerates what is baseline true, woody exaggerates what he believes to be true based on opinion, which is more often than not, false.
@@subpar-Bro, did you even listen? They're talking about abortion. Its literally one of the most divisive topics in politics lol Everything he said was controversial.
I really hate it. When woody sits there and blatantly lies about things we can easily verify
And he calls himself a news junkie while so confidently fact checking people with CNN lies
the difference between the UA-cam comments and the subreddit comments was the tipping point of me deleting that app.
Why, you want to exist in an echochamber?
@@MrFineWhiteWine if it’s one based in reality yes
Yeah most people who comment all the time on Reddit are weird af, and are so far out of touch with reality it’s crazy.
@@MrFineWhiteWine You mean reddit where the mods will censor anything too right leaning on the big subreddits?
*even slightly right leaning@@untested3344
Immediately knew this video would start off with the most garbage takes from woody
i was hoping this was the episode he wasnt in smh
Always
Books in school should be kid appropriate, why is that a hot take?
@@MatthewSomethingOrOther how do you determine what is or is not kid appropriate? Is a book which tells the story of a kid getting anally raped “kid appropriate”?
@@MrFineWhiteWineare you being sarcastic?
@@MrFineWhiteWine Depends on the age of the kids, for a 17 year old probably not, for a 6 year old it’s absolutely inappropriate. However, we aren’t talking about a book that has someone getting abused, we’re talking about material that is obviously pornographic.
@@Stan_Herman idk about you but I read the kite runner in 7th grade. And the outsiders which features a brutal stabbing in 6th. This whole issue is sooooo overblown imo.
@@MrFineWhiteWineyes
The last stat I saw on women in the US getting abortions showed the average income of women that got abortions and their income was far higher than what I assumed it would with the argument of not being able to afford the child being such a common argument. After seeing the average income, it basically proved that the vast amount of abortions are out of convenience and not wanting to take responsibility for one’s actions and that the financial argument was absolutely not the #1 reason, even though that seems to be to go-to argument for the people that are pro-eliminating the life of others.
They want to be able to take the life of others, but don’t you dare take their life. They are far too important to be removed from this lovely place.
Based
Drifter uses the less than 1% of cases for the case of abortion. The conversation is about the 99%.
@@ogliberty5486 the law is a precise endeavor. When we are discussing legality and how to legislate something, discussing how that legislation impacts the edge cases is important.
@MrFineWhiteWine except on this topic where edge cases are completely irrelevant since every single place where they ban that activity has exceptions for exactly those edge cases.
@@MrFineWhiteWine The law in the US is not a precise endeavor. We have common law. Laws are written, and then refined over years and decades through precedent. That's not how law works in the US. Bills don't have to be perfect, courts set precedent which changes how laws are enforced.
@@MrFineWhiteWineyeah, but you carve out exceptions, you don't legislate like it's the 99%.
@@HandsomeLongshanks and when states don’t carve out those exemptions, discussing that is important to illustrating the impact these laws are having…
Woody saying “a lot of times they hate a fake version of the democrats” might be the most hilariously ironic thing he’s ever said😂
Drift0r's position is not helping his case
Kids already have access to the internet. Banning books is like holding back a 15 foot tidal wave with a 2 inch wall.
Nah, responsible parents don’t allow their children free unrestricted/unsupervised interned access.
@@quagmoe7879Yeah so helicopter parenting like that doesn’t work for the internet.
You’re going to produce a kid that is leagues behind in understanding how to navigate the largest resource humans have.
@@CosmicAnimalClan I’m going to produce a sane and normal kid you mean. The internet is not that important in reality and it’s telling that you think it is. All it does is poison young people’s minds, I’ve seen it over and over again. I grew up without internet access until I was about 15/16 and that’s how it should be for everyone. There’s no reason a child should be browsing the internet, period. And they’ll figure out how the internet works, they don’t need to use it from a young age to understand how it works so that’s just a very bizarre and nonsensical argument to make.
@@CosmicAnimalClan Not allowing unrestricted access to the internet isn't helicopter parenting.
“Let’s be real generous and progressive here” ngl this mental patient they had on is pretty funny
These children aren't destined to be in a struggling family that are less than ideal to raise a child in... Adoption is an option and should be considered.
@@gloriousapplebees Taylor’s whole view is premised on the idea that we value all “life” completely equally from the point of conception to natural death. Its just not true and everyone innately knows it. I can guarantee if Taylor was in a burning building, next to him there is a fridge with 100 conceived zygotes and 1 6 month old baby in a stroller, he could only save the baby or the fridge, 100 out of 100 times he’s saving the baby. Everyone innately knows that conceived zygotes aren’t the same level of “life”
@@MrFineWhiteWine okay, yeah probably. Does this tie into adoption VS abortion at all or?
I'm not even making a pro one or the other comment, just that no one brings up adoption as an option and it absolutely is.
@@gloriousapplebees yes. Because adoption doesn’t solve the issue of carrying the pregnancy to term. Adoption is a solution when the issue is parenthood, not pregnancy. Thats a big difference. Presenting adoption as a replacement for abortion isn’t valid because it’s not fixing the same problem.
@@MrFineWhiteWine you're moving the goal post. It absolutely is a parenthood issue when we're talking about the point of families wanting to abort a pregnancy because they can't handle caring for a child. This is the only thing I'm talking about, adoption is an option and it wasn't mentioned and often isn't in the conversation but absolutely should be.
@@gloriousapplebees when discussing the economic impact it’s not just about the impact of raising a child, it’s the impact of pregnancy. Driftor didn’t adequately express that but it doesn’t make it any less true to the consecration as a whole.
woody is beyond cringe
Woody and driftor are bundles.
Woody lives in his own world , constantly lives in denial.
If we had to fight a war right now with an army of nothing but either woodys, filthy robots, or driftors our only chance would be the militia of woodys. Hes the idiot of the show but he still represents america in some ways. People like filthy and driftor barely have a solidified gender
Have your girlfriend or wife call planned parenthood and ask for a 34 week all ng abortion. They will schedule her.
They won't, schizo
Mf is just straight up lying
you should be able to release any literature
the repercussions afterwards are fair game
"There's absolutely no reason for those books to be in schools"
There is most definitely a reason...and its very disturbing and horrific.
a politician that doesn’t do anything is better than any politician we’ve ever had
they aren’t helping you by passing new legislation, you are deranged
Just started the video but i already know woody is gonna say something about kink shaming
I don’t know why they do podcast with that drifter dude I bet Kyle has a crush on him Waiting for him to transform
Or hear me out. You can be friends with people who have different opinions then you. It's actually considered healthy
Also, love the comments you put on screen about the game sometimes or just a comment on what someone saod
Taylor and Kyle, two childless incels, commenting on how to best raise children. Gotta love PKA.
woody is only less annoying when Drift0r is on
scarry ahh gameplay
Whats the game on screen?
it’s a back room game, escape the backrooms i think. get high or drunk with some friends and play for 1:58 and refund that garbage
Kirby's Dream Land
Lavon Affair
W Taylor
I can't walk or sit up and I see demons....anyways listen to me about abortion lol
Woody is disconnected from reality.
I bet woody thinks he can ban every book he want and people will never say anything.
big ups
Taylor is like worse than Woody at this point. Holy crap.
Ban the books I’ll teach them myself
L Taylor
🤦♂️🤡
Taylor can exaggerate, and so can woody- the difference is that Taylor exaggerates what is baseline true, woody exaggerates what he believes to be true based on opinion, which is more often than not, false.
what did he say that’s controversial?
@@subpar-Bro, did you even listen? They're talking about abortion. Its literally one of the most divisive topics in politics lol Everything he said was controversial.
@@indiomoustafa2047Controversial, and true.
L Taylor