Section 148 NI Act | Deposit Of 20% Amount Is Not An Absolute Rule, Says Supreme Court

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 21

  • @daaliyahkhan5418
    @daaliyahkhan5418 Рік тому +1

    Flourish beyond Skies. Amazing content

  • @vishwa7637
    @vishwa7637 Рік тому +2

    Section 148 of NI Act should be implemented seriously and mandatorily to avoid escape from liability under cheque. Now a days SC viewing the cases very liberally rather than seriously. As a result, victim should suffer further more because of such liberal view and accused take undue benefit out of such liberal view. As a result, justice to the victim further delayed. It us nothing but adding salt to pain.

  • @madhugrm_55
    @madhugrm_55 Рік тому +2

    Unfortunate that even to get 20% of the amount the complainant has to knock on the doors of the SC. Even after knocking, the HC has been directed to look into the case, afresh. It may again take min of 5 years.
    The litigants may hv to spend their entire life perhaps to get the amount or even their legal heirs.
    It's because of inordinate delay the common man is losing confidence in our justice system.
    In my two cases one involving Rs.4L, the complaint losing interest n in another case of Rs.20L, the complainant lost interest n didn't pursue further.
    Common experience says timeline to be fixed n each case must hv limitation to appeal say in such cases HCs to be the last stage for appeal n not SC.
    SC should hear only constitutonal issues.

  • @nileshjoshi99
    @nileshjoshi99 Рік тому +1

    UA-cam has been flooded with various cases and legal practices. Your forte is daily updates, please continue the good work.

  • @mesrinivasane
    @mesrinivasane 9 місяців тому +1

    No use for this case. Court will not give the judgement before spending the all the money and you will never get the amount. Time waste case in court

  • @pradeepsn9292
    @pradeepsn9292 Рік тому

    Please take up the consumer court judgements on contract act and RBI guidelines on auction procedure and observation of consumer court or civil court.

  • @k.purushotham7913
    @k.purushotham7913 11 місяців тому

    Good explanation

  • @shyamchaudhary636
    @shyamchaudhary636 Рік тому

    It is not left to the discretion of judge whether to levy 20% compensation under section 148. Supreme Court judgement is erred

  • @Squirrelgillu
    @Squirrelgillu Рік тому

    Please discuss such judgments on our core law subjects taught in law colleges and also asked in competitive exams more frequently

  • @advocategajendrakumardhanb1738

    Kindly keep updating sister but please in Hindi by which every practioner may understand easily

  • @pankajdabas9700
    @pankajdabas9700 Рік тому

    Very nyc

  • @manjegowdakk7011
    @manjegowdakk7011 Рік тому

    Nice

  • @spoorthisiddharth4982
    @spoorthisiddharth4982 Рік тому +1

    On electronic evidence pls

    • @cuties729
      @cuties729 Рік тому

      Yes videos on evidence act imp section like 32,9 etc

  • @saniyabenazir1829
    @saniyabenazir1829 Рік тому

    This video has been helpful cause I'm already working on the same case. Also I have a doubt if someone holds your property documents without your consent, what action can be taken?

  • @mesrinivasane
    @mesrinivasane 9 місяців тому

    How many years cheque bounced case will take ?

  • @ajazbhat88
    @ajazbhat88 Рік тому

    Can you plz share the Judgment....

  • @sahiduahmed9172
    @sahiduahmed9172 Рік тому

    Can you please share the cause title of the case

  • @lalitdave9735
    @lalitdave9735 11 місяців тому

    Verdict please

  • @peacockfeathersentertainme5137
    @peacockfeathersentertainme5137 12 днів тому

    Please give me the citation.
    Case number details..

  • @AnwarAkhtar
    @AnwarAkhtar Рік тому

    Need to know legal opinion incase where Devlooers and Builders run financial ponzi schemes of lucrative interest rate of return for heavy investment and later on stop paying and responding?