Can't blame them, it's safest but once something goes wrong then oh boy. Country like Japan with lots of natural disasters need to either secure them better or think of something with lesser impact when another one of those come.
@@aidaaliten8817 cringe anti-nuclear propaganda Compare the CO2 emission rate per kWh between France (70-80% of the production comes from nuclear power) and Germany (dismantled its nuclear industry for "green" energy) => 50 g/kWh for France versus 500-600 g/kWh for Germany Germany was forced to open coal-fired power plants after the crisis with Russia...
@@aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa6162 yeah thats why alomst 50% of frances npps standt still and they need to buy from the EU grid. shit happens when a new npp cost far more than inflation can cover 60 years later... dealing with the waste not included. :D btw Co2 can be captured from the air, have fun dealing with a explode nuclear reaktor and more nuclear waste.
Well done UK from one of the forerunners to letting Belgium outperform us (no offence intended to Belgium, just a small country). The story of privatised mismanaged UK where it is all about CEO and shareholders profit.
La Belgique possède que 7 réacteurs nucléaire 3 a Tihange ( Liège ) Et 4 a Doel ( Anvers ) Et un centre de recherche nucléaire. Ce n'est pas la faute du capitalisme mais simplement que le nucléaire fait de nombreux débats et peut etre que économiquement ce n est pas intérrésant pour le royaume unis. La Belgique a des marchés avec son ancienne colonie du congo qui détient les plus gros gissement d'uranium... Du coup c'était pratique...
No problem. Here in Belgium we are also facing with some bad management for nuclear matters. Some years, all of our nuclear reactors are not producing at the same time.
France isn't a leader at all. France builds many reactors but contributes nothing to their development. The leaders at the moment are Japan and Russia.
@@jamesgavin6171 Per capita they are number 1. The US would need to generate roughly 1850 TWh to match. Sweden probably has the second highest output per capita followed by Belgium.
France, UK and USA only buries nuclear waste or send it to third countries. But Russia specially saved up waste and now Russia only country who starts fast neutron industrial reactor "БН800" which can use nuclear waste. Thanks to this, Russia provided with nuclear energy for thousands of years to come. So what did you say about the leaders there?
Oui mais Macron et sa clique de mondialistes veulent couler le savoir nucléaire français au profit des renouvelables ! Nous étions le premier exportateur d'énergie d'Europe, nous venons de dégringoler d'une place et gare aux coupures cet hiver ...
At 3:00 you can see the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear catastrophe and how the USSR and then other nuclear power nations started to decrease their production of nuclear power in the 10 years afterwards. Then at 6:44 you see the 2011 Fukushima nuclear catastrophe, with Japan shutting down ALL of its nuclear power plants for a few years. This dropped Japan from #3 in the world in terms of nuclear power to nonexistent. These are the reasons nations like Italy never really embraced nuclear energy, and why nations like Germany, Sweden and the UK started to decommission old nuclear power plants--to prevent a Chernobyl or a Fukushima from happening in their own lands.
if it so clean what did you do with the nuclear waste ? germany still has no solution and they did shut down most of it plants..................... nuclear power it only called save because for more the 60 years the tell us they will solve the nuclear waste problem tomorrow
USSR not need many nuclear energy. And else USSR and Russia now think about disposal of nuclear waste unlike USA, who only buries nuclear waste. Russia is only country who starts fast neutron industrial reactor "БН800" which can use nuclear waste.
I'm so sad that my country gave up nuclear power. We were the third producer of nuclear energy in 1966 and somehow we ended up being one of the most dependent EU nation to Nazi Russian gas. And if that wasn't enough instead of solving our problems we started another government crisis. Sometimes i wonder if things could have worked out differently.
im not, half of france npps are not running, they imported 2021 8twh from germany alone... Be sad couse our fucking politicians didnt push reneawable like they should, insteadt we got BS paperwork and a cashgrab for companys. Getting 0,08€ kwh from PV and paying 0,50 sounds like good deal. >_>
@@Kamonohashiii TWh is a unit of energy, not an energy rate. The data are given as prospected annual outputs at a given time of the year, not the amount produced during the year. That is why we see fluctuations even within the same year.
It is official rate of nuclear power generation, it is not only for electricity. There is no Northern Korea, cause they aren't give any official information about it
Какое блять ядерное вооружение, речь идеть о выроботки атомной энергии, не все делают ядерное оружие. По этому видео можно понять, что если бы сейчас создавали ядерные бомбы то у США их было бы намного больше.
Wow, Japan really turned against nuclear power after Fukushima.
Turning back now. They're scrambling to start them back up. There's no choice.
Until now. They are gonna activate 9 nuclear reactors in the next months!
You should check the CO2 émission of Japan… turning them down has cause a lot of CO2 emission and global warming.
Can't blame them, it's safest but once something goes wrong then oh boy. Country like Japan with lots of natural disasters need to either secure them better or think of something with lesser impact when another one of those come.
@@shuaige3360 They should've go for Geothermal.
France : go nuclear and green
Germany : Wait that's illegal
Green? Wtf
@@eddithefarmer nuclear is green cry
bad kind of green tho
@@aidaaliten8817 cringe anti-nuclear propaganda
Compare the CO2 emission rate per kWh between France (70-80% of the production comes from nuclear power) and Germany (dismantled its nuclear industry for "green" energy)
=> 50 g/kWh for France versus 500-600 g/kWh for Germany
Germany was forced to open coal-fired power plants after the crisis with Russia...
@@aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa6162 yeah thats why alomst 50% of frances npps standt still and they need to buy from the EU grid.
shit happens when a new npp cost far more than inflation can cover 60 years later... dealing with the waste not included. :D
btw Co2 can be captured from the air, have fun dealing with a explode nuclear reaktor and more nuclear waste.
Well done UK from one of the forerunners to letting Belgium outperform us (no offence intended to Belgium, just a small country). The story of privatised mismanaged UK where it is all about CEO and shareholders profit.
2021 Czechia made almost same nuclear energy output a the UK and whole India :D
Czechia has 10M inhabitants. India 1,3B :)
La Belgique possède que 7 réacteurs nucléaire 3 a Tihange ( Liège )
Et 4 a Doel ( Anvers )
Et un centre de recherche nucléaire.
Ce n'est pas la faute du capitalisme mais simplement que le nucléaire fait de nombreux débats et peut etre que économiquement ce n est pas intérrésant pour le royaume unis.
La Belgique a des marchés avec son ancienne colonie du congo qui détient les plus gros gissement d'uranium...
Du coup c'était pratique...
No problem. Here in Belgium we are also facing with some bad management for nuclear matters. Some years, all of our nuclear reactors are not producing at the same time.
USA is also all about CEO and shareholders profit. So I guess it is mainly down to mismanagement.
The NHS is the worst healthcare in Western Europe
Germany in 2011, yeah we can do without nuclear, we have Russian gas. Germany in 2022, so can we get the nuclear plants back?
Sadly, a lot of people here still don't want nuclear plants "bEcAusE ChErNoByL" .
I doubt the majority of Germans want nuclear power back.
Germany was dumb
*coal plants back btw theyre ecofreaks said so
I don´t want the nuclear plants back. Too much problems, only look at France.
This year about two third of their plants don´t work.
The UK and France were really nuclear leaders in their time. France is the leader still currently.
France isn't a leader at all. France builds many reactors but contributes nothing to their development. The leaders at the moment are Japan and Russia.
Yea in Europe.
@@jamesgavin6171 Per capita they are number 1. The US would need to generate roughly 1850 TWh to match.
Sweden probably has the second highest output per capita followed by Belgium.
France, UK and USA only buries nuclear waste or send it to third countries. But Russia specially saved up waste and now Russia only country who starts fast neutron industrial reactor "БН800" which can use nuclear waste. Thanks to this, Russia provided with nuclear energy for thousands of years to come. So what did you say about the leaders there?
@@mirkofilipovic2054 nonsense. The US has deep rock storage structure and does not send waste elsewhere.
C’est vraiment énorme pour la France !
Oui mais Macron et sa clique de mondialistes veulent couler le savoir nucléaire français au profit des renouvelables !
Nous étions le premier exportateur d'énergie d'Europe, nous venons de dégringoler d'une place et gare aux coupures cet hiver ...
omg des francais ici ? 🤯
C'est revendu aux pays voisins
Huge for France with stolen property. It'll soon deflate for France
China around 2015: "Let's triple all stats."
At 3:00 you can see the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear catastrophe and how the USSR and then other nuclear power nations started to decrease their production of nuclear power in the 10 years afterwards. Then at 6:44 you see the 2011 Fukushima nuclear catastrophe, with Japan shutting down ALL of its nuclear power plants for a few years. This dropped Japan from #3 in the world in terms of nuclear power to nonexistent. These are the reasons nations like Italy never really embraced nuclear energy, and why nations like Germany, Sweden and the UK started to decommission old nuclear power plants--to prevent a Chernobyl or a Fukushima from happening in their own lands.
China's solar energy is similar to its nuclear energy.
Slovakia didn't exist till 90', Czechoslovakia did.
Good point. Just a little correction, Slovakia was established on 1. 1. 1993.
@@TheFerune Not too far. We will take western Slovakia back in one quick special military op.
1966-1971 United Kingdom
1971-present United States
Very sad to see the UK drop in this very clean form of energy.
if it so clean what did you do with the nuclear waste ?
germany still has no solution and they did shut down most of it plants.....................
nuclear power it only called save because for more the 60 years the tell us they will solve the nuclear waste problem tomorrow
Very good video !
0:01 Magic! out of thin air, suddenly Nuclear Power plant appears in 9 countries.
Really? Soviet Union has a reputation on Nuclear power and they are far behind?
@Bernard Taupe For some reason, they never defeated the United States, according to the status of nuclear terrorism, by dropping bombs.
@@zvezda4990 exactly !!!!
USSR not need many nuclear energy. And else USSR and Russia now think about disposal of nuclear waste unlike USA, who only buries nuclear waste. Russia is only country who starts fast neutron industrial reactor "БН800" which can use nuclear waste.
HOW there is USRR and Lithuania at same time!?
Per capita is more fair USA is a big country with 300 million human
There should be Czechoslovakia to 1993, Slovakia as sovereign state started to exist in 1993.
also, Slovakia probably generates more per capita
POV: it's not a good thing but okay
Now lets see indians: "Its not accurate"😂
Indians don't want to try to be number 1 in those items that can lead to disasters and tragedies like Chernobyl and Fukushima.
Before 1993 Slovakia dont exist. Those country name Czechoslovakia man..
🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷
I'm so sad that my country gave up nuclear power. We were the third producer of nuclear energy in 1966 and somehow we ended up being one of the most dependent EU nation to Nazi Russian gas. And if that wasn't enough instead of solving our problems we started another government crisis. Sometimes i wonder if things could have worked out differently.
Your country? Germany? A creators of Nazis lol 😂😂😂😂😂
Russia is not a Nazi, it's fighting the Nazis.
People voting for red and green parties brought us this. And now we get what we deserve
im not, half of france npps are not running, they imported 2021 8twh from germany alone...
Be sad couse our fucking politicians didnt push reneawable like they should, insteadt we got BS paperwork and a cashgrab for companys.
Getting 0,08€ kwh from PV and paying 0,50 sounds like good deal. >_>
The greens in germany, well done now germany has limited electricity for winter and is so dependent on russian gas, nuclear power should have stayed
You forgot Israel? What a coincedenc?
TWh??? Is this a daily rate.
Eg 25GW is 600Gwh daily.
annual
TWh = Tera Watts hours. so its in hours
@@Kamonohashiii Annual was the answer some one said
@@Kamonohashiii TWh is a unit of energy, not an energy rate. The data are given as prospected annual outputs at a given time of the year, not the amount produced during the year. That is why we see fluctuations even within the same year.
@@GrosPointRouge So per our would be just W?
Where is North Korea
It's nuclear "power" generation for electricity, nuclear weapon production is entirely different matter
@@Wabu_227 thank you
It is official rate of nuclear power generation, it is not only for electricity. There is no Northern Korea, cause they aren't give any official information about it
@@kolleyi6579 TWh is for electricity
Nuclear will rise!!! Poland can into nuclear!
I hope your experiments with nuclear power will be far from our borders. 🙂
Obviously, the UpSA corporate structure likes use govt fund circles to cash in, along with officials.!.!.!.
In a few more years, China will become the number 1 in this chart too.
Да, сами болше идейный аружие штоб бил врасие титаны. На планета земля.
Чел ты понимаешь что у Франции пара ядерных бомб а у России их 10 тыщ это как так что у Франции лучше ядерное вооружение
Какое блять ядерное вооружение, речь идеть о выроботки атомной энергии, не все делают ядерное оружие. По этому видео можно понять, что если бы сейчас создавали ядерные бомбы то у США их было бы намного больше.
This is nuclear power not nuclear bombs.
Умаров, а тебя дебила не смутило количество и состав ядерных держав🤣ps учи английский или не пиши чушь.
bullshit. Ukraine has no nucler weapon. Russia must be on the first place cuz Russhia has most nuclear weapon in the world
its not about weapon but for electricity
Some people in the comments must learn how to read
I hope you are joking.
This is nuclear power not nuclear bombs. The Soviets built nuclear power in Ukraine.
@@Fox13440 they think that number of bombs is counted in TWh or something 😀
SB. FAKE
我怀疑你都没看懂这个视频说的是什么