This story is one of the most beautiful that I have read and seen. A pure and sincere love. He could see in her a woman full of love, honesty, and a whole heart. He saw something so beautiful in her that he did not find in others. It is a precious love. SHE DID NOT HAVE A LIFE OF PRIVILEGES LIKE OTHERS, SHE LIVED SUFFERING. AND THAT IS WHAT SHE VALUED THAT LIFE IS BEAUTIFUL AND THOSE WHO HAVE EVERYTHING ARE SO HARD-HEARTED AND SHE JUST WANTED TO BE LOVED AND GET OUT OF THOSE SUFFERINGS .AND GOD PUT HER IN SUCH A GOOD MAN AND REWARDED HER WITH AN INHERITANCE THAT SHE DIDN'T EXPECT. BUT SHE DID NOT CARE ABOUT THAT, SHE JUST WANTED TO EXPERIENCE A LIFE WITH HER BELOVED HER GREAT LOVE. THIS STORY IS BEAUTIFUL. I KNOW WHAT IT IS TO LOSE A MOTHER BEING MISTREATED AND GOING THROUGH THAT SUFFERING AND I KNOW WHAT IT IS TO WISH TO HAVE THAT PERSON BY YOUR SIDE AND LOVE WITH YOUR SOUL AND THE REST WILL COME LITTLE BY LITTLE. MONEY AND WEALTH ARE NOT EVERYTHING BUT AN HONEST AND FAITHFUL HEART IS DIFFICULT TO FIND. THAT'S WHY HE FELL IN LOVE WITH HER. I WAIT FOR THAT BELOVED IN MY LIFE. I KNOW THAT THERE IS ONE IN MY HEART WAITING FOR TY.
Pure? Honest? He was hiding the truth from her. And when she found out, he wanted to make her his mistress and sully the very things he found admirable in her!!
@@judylloyd7901 he was bound to an insane woman as a very young man by his father who sold him for $. He could have put that wretched creature in a home for the insane and divorced her legally but by so doing she would have been mistreated so he kept her home with a caregiver . She was a menace to herself and others. Sets fires. He is lonely after years of living that’s ay and you blame him for loving ? He didn’t offer her as a mistress but as a wife, even after the discovery. Luckily the story ends well. I adored Jane Eyre as a young adult and even more now.
You use quite a lot of words… actually, far too many. Please don’t shout! Just say, it’s a marvellous plot, exceptional photography, great dialogues, beautiful actors and superior acting. And Desplat s soundtrack is bewitching! In short, a masterpiece.
@@doloresrodriguez7895 No te vas a arrepentir, yo aún no supero y no saco de mi cabeza la versión de 1996; William Hurt es simplemente ¡MARAVILLOSO! Charlotte es pfff Y la de 1983 bueeee ya la verás. Te obsesionaras al igual que yo con esas dos. También me vi la 1997 y aunque me encantó no me la volvería a ver, teniendo tantas otras versiones FUERA DE SERIE de donde escoger. Aunque debo confesar que el Mr rochester de 1997 tiene un noseque que te cautiva y Jane Eyre tremenda en esa versión.
The 43 version is more in line with the mystical pull over the love Edward and Jane had over each other. Orson Welles s such a powerful force it’s just amazing to see.
The movie which is most true to the spirit of the book is the Orson Welles black and white version. But of course, no movie does this literary masterpiece justice!
💞💞💞💞💞💞💞💯.I ❤️ don't forget me .I love with my 💗 you can't imagine how many times I ask God to live together and love you that way. I don't care what they say. I love you from the first day our eyes met. My heart shone again. I love you. Life is beautiful but short. And my desire is to be by your side. To love you and take care of you. I know I don't have riches. But I have a pure heart to love you.When a woman finds this true love, she takes care of it with all her heart. A woman who is loved values what she has and feels protected that he will take care of her and rest in peace and every time she sees him, she hugs him, it is protection and true love. I love it when she puts her face on his leg. when he arrives is beautiful she feels safe and loved.
As no one ever said, "your soul is what I want," you must be talking about something other than the book "Jane Eyre." I don't see why the headline connects with it. I suppose this is for people who don't read, just watch a TV adaptation.
I just watched the 2011 movie on Netflix and was interested in understanding the character of Mr. Rochester. Is it just me, or does Mr. Rochester come across as a self-centered selfish man who only wants Jane as an escape from his mess? I question, does Mr. Rochester ever love Jane, or does he only love what Jane can provide him? Also, the way he treats his daughter Adele is troubling, since she can’t give him anything worth value in his eyes, he discards her. This comes across as very militant and narcissistic, traits that women need to watch out for. In addition, Mr. Rochester also shows traits of manipulation and deceit, where he lies to Jane, plays with her emotions, and then threatens her with violence when she leaves. I understand Mr. Rochester is deserving of slight sympathy, but should Jane have really returned to him.
Adele most likely wasn't his daughter...He was doing a favor since she was an orphan and considering Adele's mother betrayal it was very altruistic from him
Mr. Rochester was tricked into marrying his wife (She was mentally ill and that was kept a secret from him) as a young man. He was lied to by his father and brother so that left him betrayed and hurt. Adele's mother cheated on him and got pregnant. She left her daughter in a basket for Mr. Rochester. He didn't want to put the baby into an orphanage knowing the quality of life she would have. Adele sadly like her mother had a love for being seen and materialistic those qualities annoyed Rochester. Despite that he gave Adele the best he could. He genuinely loved Jane. Her honesty and her morals are what attracted him to her.
You should read the book, no movie can explain what the book is all about. Also, feminism is not an issue here. Mr. Rochester actually is a generous unselfish man, the loving type we ladies want. He could have left his mad wife in an asylum, but knowing the awful living conditions in such a place, he prefers to keep her in his own house (not the other smaller one, mentioned in the book, which was unhealthy, where he and Jane end up living). And he does this, putting his own life and others lives at risk, which is a courageous but rather careless thing to do. Perhaps he is a bit too confident? He does all he can for Adele too, although she probably was not his daughter, he could have left her in Paris, where she would have become like her mother. Also to me it was always evident, after reading the book several times, that his love for Jane is stronger and deeper than her love for him. He is ready to sacrifice everything for her, including his self respect and his hope for an eternal after life (”I will atone...”) for her, but she is not willing to sacrifice her own self respect and her prejudices for him - believeing he would eventually end up despising her, as he did the other women in his life. This would have been impossible. true love never ends in despising the object of your love. Her prejudices are simply too strong. Also, she is almost ready to marry St. John Rivers... who would do this when remembering a love like the one she has abandoned? I believe we, today, would never leave a man who can love like this. But she did. Well, we cannot judge using a modern way of thinking, but still... can you imagine leaving him, even if living back then...? For those who prefer the adaptations, the 1973 series, with Sorcha Cusack and Michael Jayston, is brilliant and Michael Jayston is breathtaking in the role of Mr. Rochester. Also, the 1983 series is great, Timothy Dalton and Zelah Clarke are wonderful, but their chemistry is not as outstanding as in the 1973 adaptation - my favourite one by far, Michael Jayston shines (unfortunately it is blocked on YT.)
@@risingsun8039 Джейн любила мистера Рочестера, но больше она любила Бога. И те моральные качества, которые были заложены в неё в детстве не в пансионе воспитателями и настоятелем с их лживой религиозностью, а её старшей подругой, имевшей живую веру, и умершей от болезни, были очень сильны. Именно поэтому она оставила Рочестера, т.к. связь с ним на тот момент была бы грехом прелюбодеяния - жива его жена, хоть и сумасшедшая. И чувства их друг к другу очень сильны - Джейн боялась последствий, зная буйный нрав Рочестера и себя. Поэтому она удалилась. Но, очищенные временем и испытаниями, которые их постигли, чувства Рочестера и Джейн только окрепли и стали лучшего качества. Джейн теперь была равна ему по материальному положению, а он очистился от эгоизма и обрёл живую веру... Вам не понять этих переживаний верующего человека(я говорю о Джейн) и вы списываете всё на предрассудки и старые времена...😔
Beautiful movie, super director, great actors…super soundtrack and photography. In contrast with Mr Rochester, (boy, I almost fainted) Jane Eyre is far from handsome. But her performance is rather ok. The only problem… Mr Mason! He s supposed to be Mr Rochester s brother in law, but looks more like a choir boy. Almost a child. Very odd.
I don't know this version of Jane Eyre...I love the actress Mia Wasikowska but Michael Fassbender is not my cup of tea...maybe I should give it a chance...
The strength of character of Jane is exemplary! I miss human morality. Our world of “whatever” is the demise of us.
This story is one of the most beautiful that I have read and seen. A pure and sincere love. He could see in her a woman full of love, honesty, and a whole heart. He saw something so beautiful in her that he did not find in others. It is a precious love. SHE DID NOT HAVE A LIFE OF PRIVILEGES LIKE OTHERS, SHE LIVED SUFFERING. AND THAT IS WHAT SHE VALUED THAT LIFE IS BEAUTIFUL AND THOSE WHO HAVE EVERYTHING ARE SO HARD-HEARTED AND SHE JUST WANTED TO BE LOVED AND GET OUT OF THOSE SUFFERINGS .AND GOD PUT HER IN SUCH A GOOD MAN AND REWARDED HER WITH AN INHERITANCE THAT SHE DIDN'T EXPECT. BUT SHE DID NOT CARE ABOUT THAT, SHE JUST WANTED TO EXPERIENCE A LIFE WITH HER BELOVED HER GREAT LOVE. THIS STORY IS BEAUTIFUL. I KNOW WHAT IT IS TO LOSE A MOTHER BEING MISTREATED AND GOING THROUGH THAT SUFFERING AND I KNOW WHAT IT IS TO WISH TO HAVE THAT PERSON BY YOUR SIDE AND LOVE WITH YOUR SOUL AND THE REST WILL COME LITTLE BY LITTLE. MONEY AND WEALTH ARE NOT EVERYTHING BUT AN HONEST AND FAITHFUL HEART IS DIFFICULT TO FIND. THAT'S WHY HE FELL IN LOVE WITH HER. I WAIT FOR THAT BELOVED IN MY LIFE. I KNOW THAT THERE IS ONE IN MY HEART WAITING FOR TY.
BITCH, SO WELL SAID!!!!!!!!!!!!
Pure? Honest? He was hiding the truth from her. And when she found out, he wanted to make her his mistress and sully the very things he found admirable in her!!
I love that.
@@judylloyd7901 he was bound to an insane woman as a very young man by his father who sold him for $. He could have put that wretched creature in a home for the insane and divorced her legally but by so doing she would have been mistreated so he kept her home with a caregiver . She was a menace to herself and others. Sets fires. He is lonely after years of living that’s ay and you blame him for loving ? He didn’t offer her as a mistress but as a wife, even after the discovery. Luckily the story ends well. I adored Jane Eyre as a young adult and even more now.
You use quite a lot of words… actually, far too many. Please don’t shout! Just say, it’s a marvellous plot, exceptional photography, great dialogues, beautiful actors and superior acting. And Desplat s soundtrack is bewitching! In short, a masterpiece.
Having seen all film productions of this book,.. I recommend.. This one. These two actors do an incredible job with this powerful story.
The best rendition
I prefer Toby and Ruth but it’s all so personal
The best Version
This version of Jane Eyre leaves a lot of dialog as well as other parts out but good job making this montage!
90 percent of the movies made have butchered the book leaving out many parts and dialogue from the novel.
En estos momentos estoy leyendo el libro y esta version se le parece mucho encantada
Tienes que verte la version de 1983 y la de 1996.
@@alejandrarodriguezaltamira4679
Seguire tu consejo
@@doloresrodriguez7895 No te vas a arrepentir, yo aún no supero y no saco de mi cabeza la versión de 1996; William Hurt es simplemente ¡MARAVILLOSO! Charlotte es pfff Y la de 1983 bueeee ya la verás. Te obsesionaras al igual que yo con esas dos. También me vi la 1997 y aunque me encantó no me la volvería a ver, teniendo tantas otras versiones FUERA DE SERIE de donde escoger. Aunque debo confesar que el Mr rochester de 1997 tiene un noseque que te cautiva y Jane Eyre tremenda en esa versión.
@@alejandrarodriguezaltamira4679 ahora siento muchisima curiosida gracias por tus explicaciones
My fav scene,, lov frvr 🥰😍💘❤
I love the original 1943 Jane Eyre
with Orson Welles and Joan Fontaine…❤
Yes I love it too! It used to be shown regularly on a old movie show when I was a child! I think I've seen it at least 10 times!
Ow boy,… hear the grandma comments. Let me laugh. The 43 version!
The 43 version is more in line with the mystical pull over the love Edward and Jane had over each other. Orson Welles s such a powerful force it’s just amazing to see.
❤
Esta versión Me encanta y los protagonistas muy buena actuación ...Michael Fasbender Mi Amor Platónico....😂
Where is the full movie. This is the best so far.
Thank you very much!
The movie which is most true to the spirit of the book is the Orson Welles black and white version. But of course, no movie does this literary masterpiece justice!
It’s on Netflix right now.
then touch my heart
💞💞💞💞💞💞💞💯.I ❤️ don't forget me .I love with my 💗 you can't imagine how many times I ask God to live together and love you that way. I don't care what they say. I love you from the first day our eyes met. My heart shone again. I love you. Life is beautiful but short. And my desire is to be by your side. To love you and take care of you. I know I don't have riches. But I have a pure heart to love you.When a woman finds this true love, she takes care of it with all her heart. A woman who is loved values what she has and feels protected that he will take care of her and rest in peace and every time she sees him, she hugs him, it is protection and true love. I love it when she puts her face on his leg. when he arrives is beautiful she feels safe and loved.
As no one ever said, "your soul is what I want," you must be talking about something other than the book "Jane Eyre." I don't see why the headline connects with it. I suppose this is for people who don't read, just watch a TV adaptation.
Yes the title is not in the book but it is in the movie.
I just watched the 2011 movie on Netflix and was interested in understanding the character of Mr. Rochester. Is it just me, or does Mr. Rochester come across as a self-centered selfish man who only wants Jane as an escape from his mess? I question, does Mr. Rochester ever love Jane, or does he only love what Jane can provide him? Also, the way he treats his daughter Adele is troubling, since she can’t give him anything worth value in his eyes, he discards her. This comes across as very militant and narcissistic, traits that women need to watch out for. In addition, Mr. Rochester also shows traits of manipulation and deceit, where he lies to Jane, plays with her emotions, and then threatens her with violence when she leaves. I understand Mr. Rochester is deserving of slight sympathy, but should Jane have really returned to him.
Maybe there was something like that in the movie.......
Adele most likely wasn't his daughter...He was doing a favor since she was an orphan and considering Adele's mother betrayal it was very altruistic from him
Mr. Rochester was tricked into marrying his wife (She was mentally ill and that was kept a secret from him) as a young man. He was lied to by his father and brother so that left him betrayed and hurt. Adele's mother cheated on him and got pregnant. She left her daughter in a basket for Mr. Rochester. He didn't want to put the baby into an orphanage knowing the quality of life she would have. Adele sadly like her mother had a love for being seen and materialistic those qualities annoyed Rochester. Despite that he gave Adele the best he could. He genuinely loved Jane. Her honesty and her morals are what attracted him to her.
You should read the book, no movie can explain what the book is all about. Also, feminism is not an issue here. Mr. Rochester actually is a generous unselfish man, the loving type we ladies want. He could have left his mad wife in an asylum, but knowing the awful living conditions in such a place, he prefers to keep her in his own house (not the other smaller one, mentioned in the book, which was unhealthy, where he and Jane end up living). And he does this, putting his own life and others lives at risk, which is a courageous but rather careless thing to do. Perhaps he is a bit too confident? He does all he can for Adele too, although she probably was not his daughter, he could have left her in Paris, where she would have become like her mother. Also to me it was always evident, after reading the book several times, that his love for Jane is stronger and deeper than her love for him. He is ready to sacrifice everything for her, including his self respect and his hope for an eternal after life (”I will atone...”) for her, but she is not willing to sacrifice her own self respect and her prejudices for him - believeing he would eventually end up despising her, as he did the other women in his life. This would have been impossible. true love never ends in despising the object of your love. Her prejudices are simply too strong. Also, she is almost ready to marry St. John Rivers... who would do this when remembering a love like the one she has abandoned? I believe we, today, would never leave a man who can love like this. But she did. Well, we cannot judge using a modern way of thinking, but still... can you imagine leaving him, even if living back then...? For those who prefer the adaptations, the 1973 series, with Sorcha Cusack and Michael Jayston, is brilliant and Michael Jayston is breathtaking in the role of Mr. Rochester. Also, the 1983 series is great, Timothy Dalton and Zelah Clarke are wonderful, but their chemistry is not as outstanding as in the 1973 adaptation - my favourite one by far, Michael Jayston shines (unfortunately it is blocked on YT.)
@@risingsun8039 Джейн любила мистера Рочестера, но больше она любила Бога. И те моральные качества, которые были заложены в неё в детстве не в пансионе воспитателями и настоятелем с их лживой религиозностью, а её старшей подругой, имевшей живую веру, и умершей от болезни, были очень сильны. Именно поэтому она оставила Рочестера, т.к. связь с ним на тот момент была бы грехом прелюбодеяния - жива его жена, хоть и сумасшедшая. И чувства их друг к другу очень сильны - Джейн боялась последствий, зная буйный нрав Рочестера и себя. Поэтому она удалилась.
Но, очищенные временем и испытаниями, которые их постигли, чувства Рочестера и Джейн только окрепли и стали лучшего качества. Джейн теперь была равна ему по материальному положению, а он очистился от эгоизма и обрёл живую веру...
Вам не понять этих переживаний верующего человека(я говорю о Джейн) и вы списываете всё на предрассудки и старые времена...😔
I've read the book in school
I LOVE Michael fassbender. He’s soooooo hot 🥰
❤
Quote is a bit creepy tbh
i wanna get the manga of this
in my opinion this's my best virsion
Beautiful movie, super director, great actors…super soundtrack and photography. In contrast with Mr Rochester, (boy, I almost fainted) Jane Eyre is far from handsome. But her performance is rather ok. The only problem… Mr Mason! He s supposed to be Mr Rochester s brother in law, but looks more like a choir boy. Almost a child. Very odd.
❤
Title please
Jane Eyre (2011)
Je désir de regarder ce film complet
This movie is missing a lot of Jane eyre book. Not brilliant.
Уes, there are definitely a lot of plot scenes missing, but there is no way to recreate the whole book in just 120 minutes .
It would have to be a series to include everything from the book.
@@vladimirabetsova yes , 1983 Version ( Timothy Dalton - Rochester)
I don't know this version of Jane Eyre...I love the actress Mia Wasikowska but Michael Fassbender is not my cup of tea...maybe I should give it a chance...
Agreed! Mr Rochester and Shakespeare's Richard lll are characters who require an actor who has at least the essence of appeal.
❤
Po co Ci moja dusza
😂
To love beyond the workings of the intellect, the psyche, and the body.
❤