Retributive vs. Deterrence Punishment: Why We Punish - Political Philosophy Series | Academy 4 S...

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 7

  • @brandonl129
    @brandonl129 7 місяців тому +1

    the phrase an eye for an eye was originally used as a limit for how much one could be punished, it was said to help people understand that punishment shouldn’t be greater than the offense (two eyes for an eye)

  • @donnamae9080
    @donnamae9080 3 роки тому +15

    The narrator can enter the Guinness for fastest word per minute haha

  • @tzeitelmccormick8297
    @tzeitelmccormick8297 3 роки тому +1

    This was a very helpful video for my Criminal Justice class, and also very informative for someone who doesn't fully understand these two specific goals from the different goals of punishment within the correctional side of Criminal Justice. Thank you.

    • @kiralydavee
      @kiralydavee 2 роки тому

      Prioritizing the correctional side of criminal justice over the actual respecting and comforting the victim is the BIGGEST disrespect to the victim

  • @Pix6ix
    @Pix6ix 3 роки тому

    :)

  • @valentinthomas387
    @valentinthomas387 3 роки тому +1

    y a pas a parler si rapidement wesh on comprend rien frr

  • @ems3832
    @ems3832 7 місяців тому

    We can't say it's not a deterrent because we don't keep statistics on crimes that DON'T occur or the reasons for them not occurring. There could be many people who silently end up NOT committing a crime after thinking about NOT wanting to potentially go to prison! Enough with this silly "not a deterrent" nonsense.