Play your part in spreading the message of the Quran and Ahlulbayt by performing 3S: I) Share: Help us reach more hearts by sharing this content with your family and friends (especially those unaware of the Quran & Ahlulbayt). II) Subscribe: Connect with us on UA-cam & Social Media Platforms (links in description). Or join our WhatsApp list by clicking on this link: wa.me/message/TAR3C325Z5LYO1 III) Support: Producing content like this is not possible without your support. Be our patron and pledge your monthly contribution on thaqlain.org/support
Thank you shek for helping truth Islamic religion Shia most important hujja of Azam preying supporting in Nigeria god bless all members of Shia in the world
I’m a Shia and need to do my amr bil Ma’roof and Nahy an Al-munkar It is absolutely a bid’ah to add it to the Adhan as mentioned by our Shuyukh like Shaykh alSadooq (RA). Are we taking the scholars of this day and age ahead the most important scholars of our time such as Shaykh Sadooq? Your argument was that you can add a mustahab in a mustahab action. First off, according to our aHaadeeth, adhan is considered Fard (obligatory duty) for the Maghrib and Fajr prayers. So how is it still a mustahab action? Next, if this was mentioned by at the time of Ghadeer, then why don’t we see tawatur narrations on this matter since 110 companions apparently were narrating regarding “man kuntu mawla fa hadhaa aliyyun mawlaa”. How is this logically possible that not even 10 out of these 110 companions could narrate such a momentous event, such as something being added to the adhan and the Prophet reinforcing the Imamate of Imam Ali by putting it in the adhan? Subhaanallaah the more you see this the more illogical it is to abide by this bid’ah. I’m a lover (mohib) of Ahlul Bayt and don’t even consider myself a good Shia because those were the likes of Salman, Miqdad, Abu dharr and Ammar (RA). Remember the infamous hadeeth that the one who adds a bid’ah takes away from a Sunnah. The Sunnah is the established authentic way of reciting the adhan as Jibrail sent to our beloved Messenger (SAWAS). Hayyaa alaa khayril Amal is even mentioned by the same sahabas who narrated Ghadeer. Did they just forget to mention that Ali was mentioned in the adhan? We know the hadeeth of this are fabricated and don’t want to go in depth on the authenticity of such things, but know that we can still be very strong Shias without believing that Imam Ali (AS) name has to be in the adhan. I say it outside of the adhan in my supplication to Allaah that I witness one God and Muhammad is the messenger of Allaah and that Ali is His (Allaah) wali and then I proceed to mention the rest of the 11 afterwards. Alhamdulillaah this was my job to inform let’s not try to go too extreme on one side where we lose perspective of our true meaning in life, which is to preserve this beautiful deen as it was sent down by our Prophet (SAWAS).😊 Wassalaam Your Brother
I'm pretty much on the same page as you. I don't add this to the Adhan. Yes, Ali is the Wali of Allah and the rightful successor of the Holy Prophet, but none of ours Imams added Aliyyun Waliyullah in the Adhan.
The authority in the absence of Imam (may Allah hasten his reappearance) is the living Marje. If your Marje discourages, then you have to follow him. Sayed has explored it not from a Fatwa perspective but a historical perspective while discussing Adhan. Remember in duas 😊
The Marja does not have the authority to supersede what is in Shariah. When the A’immah (AS) say that the adhan and iqama have a total of 35 phrases in Saheeh hadeeth from our books, then no one has a right to go over what they (AS) say, not even a Marja. Even a marja should conclude such a thing if they are being honest intellectually from Quran and Sunnah of our A’immah (AS). Also, to point out, even at the time of Shaykh al Sadooq this issue was happening and he was the grand marja of his time. Did you notice that he also condemned such a thing? This goes to show we must condemn it as true Shia of the A’immah (AS). Shaykh Tusi (RA) also condemns it. عَلِيُّ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ عِيسَى بْنِ عُبَيْدٍ عَنْ يُونُسَ عَنْ أَبَانِ بْنِ عُثْمَانَ عَنْ إِسْمَاعِيلَ الْجُعْفِيِّ قَالَ سَمِعْتُ أَبَا جَعْفَرٍ ع يَقُولُ الْأَذَانُ وَ الْإِقَامَةُ خَمْسَةٌ وَ ثَلَاثُونَ حَرْفاً فَعَدَّ ذَلِكَ بِيَدِهِ وَاحِداً وَاحِداً الْأَذَانَ ثَمَانِيَةَ عَشَرَ حَرْفاً وَ الْإِقَامَةَ سَبْعَةَ عَشَرَ حَرْفاً He (AS) said: The Adhaan and the Iqaamah have 35 characters/parts, just check it by his hand one by one, the adhaan has 18 characters/parts and the Iqaamah has 17 characters/parts." Source: · Al-Kaafi, Al-Kulaynee, vol. 3, pg. 302 - 303, hadeeth # 3 Grading: · Al-Majlisi has said this hadeeth is Muwwaththaq (Reliable) --> Mir'aat Al-'Uqool, vol. 15, pg. 82 هَذَا هُوَ الْأَذَانُ الصَّحِيحُ لَا يُزَادُ فِيهِ وَ لَا يُنْقَصُ مِنْهُ وَ الْمُفَوِّضَةُ لَعَنَهُمُ اللَّهُ قَدْ وَضَعُوا أَخْبَاراً وَ زَادُوا فِي الْأَذَانِ مُحَمَّدٌ وَ آلُ مُحَمَّدٍ خَيْرُ الْبَرِيَّةِ مَرَّتَيْنِ وَ فِي بَعْضِ رِوَايَاتِهِمْ بَعْدَ أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ مُحَمَّداً رَسُولُ اللَّهِ أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ عَلِيّاً وَلِيُّ اللَّهِ مَرَّتَيْنِ وَ مِنْهُمْ مَنْ رَوَى بَدَلَ ذَلِكَ أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ عَلِيّاً أَمِيرُ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ حَقّاً مَرَّتَيْنِ وَ لَا شَكَّ فِي أَنَّ عَلِيّاً وَلِيُّ اللَّهِ وَ أَنَّهُ أَمِيرُ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ حَقّاً وَ أَنَّ مُحَمَّداً وَ آلَهُ صَلَوَاتُ اللَّهِ عَلَيْهِمْ خَيْرُ الْبَرِيَّةِ وَ لَكِنْ لَيْسَ ذَلِكَ فِي أَصْلِ الْأَذَانِ وَ إِنَّمَا ذَكَرْتُ ذَلِكَ لِيُعْرَفَ بِهَذِهِ الزِّيَادَةِ الْمُتَّهَمُونَ بِالتَّفْوِيضِ الْمُدَلِّسُونَ أَنْفُسَهُمْ فِي جُمْلَتِنَا Translation: "This is the Authentic / Correct (SaHeeH) adhaan; nothing is to be added or subtracted from it. The mufawwidah's (form of ghullah), may Allaah curse them, have fabricated traditions and have added to the adhaan مُحَمَّدٌ وَ آلُ مُحَمَّدٍ خَيْرُ الْبَرِيَّةِ (Muhammad and the family of Muhammad are the best of mankind) twice. In some of their traditions, after saying أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ مُحَمَّداً رَسُولُ اللَّهِ (I bear witness that Muhammad is the Prophet of Allaah) (they add) أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ عَلِيّاً وَلِيُّ اللَّهِ (I bear witness that 'Alee is the Walee of Allaah) twice. Among them there are others who narrate this أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ عَلِيّاً أَمِيرُ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ (I bear witness that 'Alee is the commander of the faithfull) twice. There is NO doubt that 'Alee is the walee of God and that he is the true commander of the faithful and that Muhammad and his family, peace be upon them, are the best of creatures. However, that is not [part] of the original adhaan. I have mentioned this so that those who have been accused of concocting tafweed and have insulated themselves in our ranks should be known." Source: 1. Al-Sadooq, Man Laa YaHduruh Al-Faqeeh, vol. 1, pg. 290 - 291 و أمّا ما روي في شواذّ الأخبار من قول: «أشهد انّ عليا وليّ اللّه و آل محمّد خير البريّة» فممّا لا يعمل عليه في الأذان و الإقامة. فمن عمل بها كان مخطئا Translation: "The are some odd (shaadh) reports of saying أشهد انّ عليا وليّ اللّه and آل محمّد خير البريّة. You must NOT do it in the Adhaan and Iqaamah. And whoever does this action is in mukhTi (error)" Source: 1. Al-Toosi, Al-Nihaayah fee Mujarrad Al-Fiqh wa Al-Fataawaa, pg. 69
Sayed Sistani clearly explain this. Its mustahab but not wajib. Even when you end your salah. It will end in salam. but people believe salah ends in 3 takbir.
Did he say Rasulullah said it's Mustahab, or Imam Ali said it's mustahab or any of the ma'soomeen said it's mustahab? Or can scholars deduce something is part of the deen as an official mustahab?
Despite treating it as wajib, mustahab etc.. I believe every shia who truly loves Imam Ali (a.s) MUST say, to show his love and compassion towards imam and imam's importance after prophet (pbuh) correct me if I'm wrong....
Excellent exposition of Mustahab acts. The distinction between Wajib and Farz needs to explained a little more. For example if a ruler declares meat to be Haram in his realm to oppose Allahs commands it is wajib on Muslims to slaughter animals and eat them to oppose the Godless command. However this is not Farz, but the circumstances have rendered it wajib. In case of Ali an wali wullah things go a little further, By saying Alian wali ullah we ae declaring that Nubuwa has ended and imama has started. it is the guarantee that false prophets will not enter Islam.
It still seems like there would be a hadith from Rasulullah to say this addition in the ad'aan, or even one of the Imams, firstly Imam Ali himself. If there's no strong evidence of any of the ma'soomeen doing so publicly themselves, then it stands out as peculiar
THE MESSENGER OF ALLAH (S.A.W.A.): "ON THE DAY OF JUDGEMENT, ALLAH WILL PLACE SERAT ( bridge) OVER HELL AND WILL NOT ALLOW ANYONE TO CROSS THE BRIDGE EXCEPT THOSE WHO CARRY A PASS ( wilaya) THAT STATES THAT THEY ACCEPT THE WILAYA OF ALI IBNE ABI TALIB (A.S.). Quran 5:67 Waliyah THIS IS THE MEANING OF THE FOLLOWING VERSE -
“AND STOP THEM. FOR VERILY THEY MUST BE QUESTIONED.' (Quran SURAH SAAFFAAT (37):24), THEY WILL BE QUESTIONED ABOUT THE WILAYAT OF AMEERUL MOMINEEN, IMAM ALI IBNE ABI TALIB (A.S.)." Al-Amaali Pg 290, Shawaahed al-Tanzeel Vol 2 Pg 264, Bashaarah al-Mustafa Le Shiah al-Murtaza Vol 2 Pg 144
No one from the Ahlulbayt or even companions is mentioned in the Quran. Because Quran is not a book of names :) But there are many verses explicitly in honour of Imam Ali. This book should help: www.al-islam.org/imam-ali-noble-quran
All the a’mal during achoura where not present during the Prophet (sawas) time but its okay ? The specific act during ziyaras also were present during the Prophet (sawas) time ? I feel that many things in the shia practice were not present during the Prophet (sawas) Time but you dont have problem with it .. but when it comes to sunnis it is completly different … I born in a shia family , and I wanted to understand why I am shia .. and during my researches I found a lot of incompréhension in the shia way of thinking . Also the Ayatolas in Iran that we follow.. also not mentions in the Prophet (sawas) Time. So many things .. I feel like traditional sunnis practice of islam is so much Clear than shia practice
Because the Ashura had not occured yet. But the significance of martyrdom of Imam Hussain was established by non other than the Prophet of Islam. Also, don't look at the practices, look at the leaders. If you can find leaders appointed by Allah in any other school you should definitely follow it.
This means at GHADEER KHUM it was not wajib rather MUSTAHIB. WE MUST RECITE IN AZAAN, NIMAZ and at all places where we recite Holy Prophet's Name. This is the main pillar of Islam. May I suggest all Marjas to unite on this and not to create differences amongst them, its a bad example
Salaam Alaykum. The difference between marajieen is the beauty of the School of Ahlulbayt. And the difference here, as Sayed has mentioned, is whether it is a compulsory part of a recommended act or a recommended part of a recommended act.
@@Thaqlain thanks but what is the common opinion? Surely this has been asked before..? I understand that it's not permissible and therefore interested to know why allowed to make it mustahab or even wajib in Adhan but not allowed in Salat.
@@Rafida_Twelver_Shia_Muslim this seems incorrect and the video clearly shows that it's not part of the Adhan and so can't be obligatory. Pls provide references to which Marja says this. Thank you.
You are free to say whatever you wish. However, the claims you have made have not been proven true in the Ahlulbayt school. We have covered this in detail in Chapter 3.
If you are not considering it as an obligatory part of Salah then you are allowed to do so. However, please refer to your scholar/Marje for more details.
I’m Shia so I say this but why in the Quran they also define shirk as taking an other wali than Allah? What is Wali exactly? And is it the correct word to use to refer to Ghadeer event considering this?
Allah in the Quran mentions himself, the Prophet, and Imam Ali as Wali. So the point of consideration is 'besides'. Any Wali besides Allah is shirk. Any Wali from Allah is Tawheed.
@@Thaqlain thank you for this explanation I was feeling a bit confused when reciting my adhan as I don’t know Arabic so well but still I know what my intention was to attest Ali wilaya but can you cite me where in the Quran he mentioned himself , Muhammad and Ali respectively as wali?
@@Thaqlain Salam Sir. I checked verse 55 Surah Maidah. No explicit mention of Syedna Ali RA. Just Allah, Muhammad SAW and true believers of Islam who pray salat and give alms. That can include any of Prophet SAW's companions, not just Hazrat Ali RA as you claim. Hazrat Abu Bakar, Uthman, Umar, Bilal, Zayd RA and many more were also true believers.
@@Thaqlain I wasn't or not the fact he himself accepting is that it was added later on if you permit adding Ali un Wali ullah to Azaan than why not in Namaz???All things we are following of our Imams and in Azan we are changing it
We believe Sayed has explained in detail about the mustahab parts of a mustahab act. Namaz is a wajib act. And you are allowed to say it as far it you don't consider it to be a part of Namaz.
@@Thaqlain We had Marja here in Pakistan Who died three days ago May Allah grant him highest place in Jannah Ameen...He said that adding Ali un wali ullah in Azaan makes it Baatil and he also told about its history it was added back in 6th century by Iranian and in 15th century Ali un Wali ullah was added in Namaz So now people are defending Ali un wali ullah in Azan but not in Namaz Isn't that double standard
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #1 НАЧАЛО ПУТЕШЕСТВИЯ [Новый сезон] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/380Q7gLWGvk/mqdefault.jpg)
Play your part in spreading the message of the Quran and Ahlulbayt by performing 3S:
I) Share: Help us reach more hearts by sharing this content with your family and friends (especially those unaware of the Quran & Ahlulbayt).
II) Subscribe: Connect with us on UA-cam & Social Media Platforms (links in description). Or join our WhatsApp list by clicking on this link: wa.me/message/TAR3C325Z5LYO1
III) Support: Producing content like this is not possible without your support. Be our patron and pledge your monthly contribution on thaqlain.org/support
Prophet Muhammad s.a.w. and imam Ali a.s. can never be separated
💯 FACT
♥️💐
@@semakulaatibu4564 he was a guide sent to us by Allah swt and he and his progeny are our righteous leader after prophet s.a.w.w.s.
Spot on!
🌹🙏
May Allah swt bless you abundantly for making these informative short clips
It became a mustahab / recommended by necessity in order to make the difference between keeping and abandoning the notion of imamate.
Beautiful and precise explanation God-bless you and your team. Thank you
Thank you so much for the good work
May Allah bless you all
I love prophet muhammed (sawas) and his ahlalbayt (as)!!!❤❤❤❤❤
تقبل الله أعمالكم مولانا
I love the qazwini family!!!❤❤❤❤❤
thank you brother Allah bless you
If Imam Ali was here, i truly believed he will order only the adhan of the Prophet the way it recited in original form.
And what makes u believe that U have the original version
Amazing video💕💫
Thank you shek for helping truth Islamic religion Shia most important hujja of Azam preying supporting in Nigeria god bless all members of Shia in the world
Alhamdulillah
I’m a Shia and need to do my amr bil Ma’roof and Nahy an Al-munkar
It is absolutely a bid’ah to add it to the Adhan as mentioned by our Shuyukh like Shaykh alSadooq (RA). Are we taking the scholars of this day and age ahead the most important scholars of our time such as Shaykh Sadooq?
Your argument was that you can add a mustahab in a mustahab action. First off, according to our aHaadeeth, adhan is considered Fard (obligatory duty) for the Maghrib and Fajr prayers. So how is it still a mustahab action? Next, if this was mentioned by at the time of Ghadeer, then why don’t we see tawatur narrations on this matter since 110 companions apparently were narrating regarding “man kuntu mawla fa hadhaa aliyyun mawlaa”. How is this logically possible that not even 10 out of these 110 companions could narrate such a momentous event, such as something being added to the adhan and the Prophet reinforcing the Imamate of Imam Ali by putting it in the adhan? Subhaanallaah the more you see this the more illogical it is to abide by this bid’ah.
I’m a lover (mohib) of Ahlul Bayt and don’t even consider myself a good Shia because those were the likes of Salman, Miqdad, Abu dharr and Ammar (RA).
Remember the infamous hadeeth that the one who adds a bid’ah takes away from a Sunnah. The Sunnah is the established authentic way of reciting the adhan as Jibrail sent to our beloved Messenger (SAWAS).
Hayyaa alaa khayril Amal is even mentioned by the same sahabas who narrated Ghadeer. Did they just forget to mention that Ali was mentioned in the adhan?
We know the hadeeth of this are fabricated and don’t want to go in depth on the authenticity of such things, but know that we can still be very strong Shias without believing that Imam Ali (AS) name has to be in the adhan.
I say it outside of the adhan in my supplication to Allaah that I witness one God and Muhammad is the messenger of Allaah and that Ali is His (Allaah) wali and then I proceed to mention the rest of the 11 afterwards.
Alhamdulillaah this was my job to inform let’s not try to go too extreme on one side where we lose perspective of our true meaning in life, which is to preserve this beautiful deen as it was sent down by our Prophet (SAWAS).😊
Wassalaam
Your Brother
I'm pretty much on the same page as you. I don't add this to the Adhan. Yes, Ali is the Wali of Allah and the rightful successor of the Holy Prophet, but none of ours Imams added Aliyyun Waliyullah in the Adhan.
If your Shia then I’m a unicorn 🦄
The authority in the absence of Imam (may Allah hasten his reappearance) is the living Marje. If your Marje discourages, then you have to follow him. Sayed has explored it not from a Fatwa perspective but a historical perspective while discussing Adhan. Remember in duas 😊
The Marja does not have the authority to supersede what is in Shariah. When the A’immah (AS) say that the adhan and iqama have a total of 35 phrases in Saheeh hadeeth from our books, then no one has a right to go over what they (AS) say, not even a Marja. Even a marja should conclude such a thing if they are being honest intellectually from Quran and Sunnah of our A’immah (AS). Also, to point out, even at the time of Shaykh al Sadooq this issue was happening and he was the grand marja of his time. Did you notice that he also condemned such a thing? This goes to show we must condemn it as true Shia of the A’immah (AS). Shaykh Tusi (RA) also condemns it.
عَلِيُّ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ عِيسَى بْنِ عُبَيْدٍ عَنْ يُونُسَ عَنْ أَبَانِ بْنِ عُثْمَانَ عَنْ إِسْمَاعِيلَ الْجُعْفِيِّ قَالَ سَمِعْتُ أَبَا جَعْفَرٍ ع يَقُولُ الْأَذَانُ وَ الْإِقَامَةُ خَمْسَةٌ وَ ثَلَاثُونَ حَرْفاً فَعَدَّ ذَلِكَ بِيَدِهِ وَاحِداً وَاحِداً الْأَذَانَ ثَمَانِيَةَ عَشَرَ حَرْفاً وَ الْإِقَامَةَ سَبْعَةَ عَشَرَ حَرْفاً
He (AS) said: The Adhaan and the Iqaamah have 35 characters/parts, just check it by his hand one by one, the adhaan has 18 characters/parts and the Iqaamah has 17 characters/parts."
Source:
· Al-Kaafi, Al-Kulaynee, vol. 3, pg. 302 - 303, hadeeth # 3
Grading:
· Al-Majlisi has said this hadeeth is Muwwaththaq (Reliable)
--> Mir'aat Al-'Uqool, vol. 15, pg. 82
هَذَا هُوَ الْأَذَانُ الصَّحِيحُ لَا يُزَادُ فِيهِ وَ لَا يُنْقَصُ مِنْهُ وَ الْمُفَوِّضَةُ لَعَنَهُمُ اللَّهُ قَدْ وَضَعُوا أَخْبَاراً وَ زَادُوا فِي الْأَذَانِ مُحَمَّدٌ وَ آلُ مُحَمَّدٍ خَيْرُ الْبَرِيَّةِ مَرَّتَيْنِ وَ فِي بَعْضِ رِوَايَاتِهِمْ بَعْدَ أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ مُحَمَّداً رَسُولُ اللَّهِ أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ عَلِيّاً وَلِيُّ اللَّهِ مَرَّتَيْنِ وَ مِنْهُمْ مَنْ رَوَى بَدَلَ ذَلِكَ أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ عَلِيّاً أَمِيرُ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ حَقّاً مَرَّتَيْنِ وَ لَا شَكَّ فِي أَنَّ عَلِيّاً وَلِيُّ اللَّهِ وَ أَنَّهُ أَمِيرُ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ حَقّاً وَ أَنَّ مُحَمَّداً وَ آلَهُ صَلَوَاتُ اللَّهِ عَلَيْهِمْ خَيْرُ الْبَرِيَّةِ وَ لَكِنْ لَيْسَ ذَلِكَ فِي أَصْلِ الْأَذَانِ وَ إِنَّمَا ذَكَرْتُ ذَلِكَ لِيُعْرَفَ بِهَذِهِ الزِّيَادَةِ الْمُتَّهَمُونَ بِالتَّفْوِيضِ الْمُدَلِّسُونَ أَنْفُسَهُمْ فِي جُمْلَتِنَا
Translation: "This is the Authentic / Correct (SaHeeH) adhaan; nothing is to be added or subtracted from it. The mufawwidah's (form of ghullah), may Allaah curse them, have fabricated traditions and have added to the adhaan مُحَمَّدٌ وَ آلُ مُحَمَّدٍ خَيْرُ الْبَرِيَّةِ (Muhammad and the family of Muhammad are the best of mankind) twice. In some of their traditions, after saying أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ مُحَمَّداً رَسُولُ اللَّهِ (I bear witness that Muhammad is the Prophet of Allaah) (they add) أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ عَلِيّاً وَلِيُّ اللَّهِ (I bear witness that 'Alee is the Walee of Allaah) twice. Among them there are others who narrate this أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ عَلِيّاً أَمِيرُ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ (I bear witness that 'Alee is the commander of the faithfull) twice. There is NO doubt that 'Alee is the walee of God and that he is the true commander of the faithful and that Muhammad and his family, peace be upon them, are the best of creatures. However, that is not [part] of the original adhaan. I have mentioned this so that those who have been accused of concocting tafweed and have insulated themselves in our ranks should be known."
Source:
1. Al-Sadooq, Man Laa YaHduruh Al-Faqeeh, vol. 1, pg. 290 - 291
و أمّا ما روي في شواذّ الأخبار من قول: «أشهد انّ عليا وليّ اللّه و آل محمّد خير البريّة» فممّا لا يعمل عليه في الأذان و الإقامة. فمن عمل بها كان مخطئا
Translation: "The are some odd (shaadh) reports of saying أشهد انّ عليا وليّ اللّه and آل محمّد خير البريّة. You must NOT do it in the Adhaan and Iqaamah. And whoever does this action is in mukhTi (error)"
Source:
1. Al-Toosi, Al-Nihaayah fee Mujarrad Al-Fiqh wa Al-Fataawaa, pg. 69
If you can interpret hadith and deduce shariah laws from it then you definitely don't need a Marje. Because you are a Mujtahid yourself 🙂
Sayed Sistani clearly explain this. Its mustahab but not wajib. Even when you end your salah. It will end in salam. but people believe salah ends in 3 takbir.
Can you give me a site where he states this please I’m still learning about my Madhab ❤
Did he say Rasulullah said it's Mustahab, or Imam Ali said it's mustahab or any of the ma'soomeen said it's mustahab? Or can scholars deduce something is part of the deen as an official mustahab?
Despite treating it as wajib, mustahab etc.. I believe every shia who truly loves Imam Ali (a.s) MUST say, to show his love and compassion towards imam and imam's importance after prophet (pbuh)
correct me if I'm wrong....
Indeed we should never miss an oppurtunity to present our loyalty and submission to the Wilayah of Amir al-Momineen.
Brilliant man i hope one day i can meet hi m
InshaAllah you will one day :)
Excellent exposition of Mustahab acts. The distinction between Wajib and Farz needs to explained a little more. For example if a ruler declares meat to be Haram in his realm to oppose Allahs commands it is wajib on Muslims to slaughter animals and eat them to oppose the Godless command. However this is not Farz, but the circumstances have rendered it wajib. In case of Ali an wali wullah things go a little further, By saying Alian wali ullah we ae declaring that Nubuwa has ended and imama has started. it is the guarantee that false prophets will not enter Islam.
It still seems like there would be a hadith from Rasulullah to say this addition in the ad'aan, or even one of the Imams, firstly Imam Ali himself. If there's no strong evidence of any of the ma'soomeen doing so publicly themselves, then it stands out as peculiar
THE MESSENGER OF ALLAH (S.A.W.A.):
"ON THE DAY OF JUDGEMENT, ALLAH WILL PLACE SERAT ( bridge) OVER HELL AND WILL NOT ALLOW ANYONE TO CROSS THE BRIDGE EXCEPT THOSE WHO CARRY A PASS ( wilaya) THAT STATES
THAT THEY ACCEPT THE WILAYA OF ALI IBNE ABI TALIB (A.S.). Quran 5:67 Waliyah
THIS IS THE MEANING OF THE FOLLOWING VERSE -
“AND STOP THEM. FOR VERILY THEY MUST BE
QUESTIONED.' (Quran SURAH SAAFFAAT (37):24),
THEY WILL BE QUESTIONED ABOUT THE WILAYAT OF
AMEERUL MOMINEEN, IMAM ALI IBNE ABI TALIB (A.S.)."
Al-Amaali Pg 290,
Shawaahed al-Tanzeel Vol 2 Pg 264,
Bashaarah al-Mustafa Le Shiah al-Murtaza Vol 2 Pg 144
You are 1 000 000 000% right!
❤️🤲🏼
Salam. How come Ali RA is not mentioned in the Quran ? Curious to hear. Ty
No one from the Ahlulbayt or even companions is mentioned in the Quran. Because Quran is not a book of names :)
But there are many verses explicitly in honour of Imam Ali. This book should help: www.al-islam.org/imam-ali-noble-quran
Quran is a book of *Ayat. Ayah* means *"sign".* Allah has given many signs or Ayat referring to all of Aimmah [imams] of Ahlul Bayt.
@@Thaqlain why should you leave out other family members of Nabi Muhammad Peace and Blessings Be Upon Him and place important on others?
@@Islam-Revert We give importance to those on which all schools agree that the Prophet gave importance to: Ahlal Kisa.
#HadithThaqlain
I didn't hear any mention of any of the 12 Imams who used to do it, and hadith about them doing so. Did I miss something?
When was the last time an Imam was allowed to give Adhan in a Mosque?
All the a’mal during achoura where not present during the Prophet (sawas) time but its okay ? The specific act during ziyaras also were present during the Prophet (sawas) time ?
I feel that many things in the shia practice were not present during the Prophet (sawas) Time but you dont have problem with it .. but when it comes to sunnis it is completly different …
I born in a shia family , and I wanted to understand why I am shia .. and during my researches I found a lot of incompréhension in the shia way of thinking . Also the Ayatolas in Iran that we follow.. also not mentions in the Prophet (sawas) Time. So many things ..
I feel like traditional sunnis practice of islam is so much Clear than shia practice
Because the Ashura had not occured yet. But the significance of martyrdom of Imam Hussain was established by non other than the Prophet of Islam. Also, don't look at the practices, look at the leaders. If you can find leaders appointed by Allah in any other school you should definitely follow it.
Ahhsantom
Lanat on the enemies of the Ahlul Bayt a.s.
This means at GHADEER KHUM it was not wajib rather MUSTAHIB. WE MUST RECITE IN AZAAN, NIMAZ and at all places where we recite Holy Prophet's Name. This is the main pillar of Islam. May I suggest all Marjas to unite on this and not to create differences amongst them, its a bad example
Salaam Alaykum. The difference between marajieen is the beauty of the School of Ahlulbayt. And the difference here, as Sayed has mentioned, is whether it is a compulsory part of a recommended act or a recommended part of a recommended act.
Yeah, this testimony was introduced by Abdulla Ibn Saba, the Yemeni Jew.
Proof :)
@@Thaqlain See Shia book Kitāb Firaq Al Shīʿa By Al Hasan Ibn Musa Al Nawbakhti.
Where to see? Should we read the whole book to find your random accusation?
Salaam alaykum, I had a question as to whether is should be read as Ash-Hadu Anna Aliyun Wali Ullah or Ash-Hadu Anna Aliyan Wali Ullah
Alaykum Salaam. Correct Arabic for all sentences in Adhan is mentioned in Tawzeeh al-Masail of your Marje.
Is it permissible to say the 3rd Shahadah in the Tashahhud of the Salat as a Mustahab act?
You will have to consult your Marje on that :)
@@Thaqlain thanks but what is the common opinion? Surely this has been asked before..? I understand that it's not permissible and therefore interested to know why allowed to make it mustahab or even wajib in Adhan but not allowed in Salat.
Keeping in mind that Tashhud, unlike Adhan, is an obligatory act of an obligatory act, Marajieen have showed caution in this matter.
It is obligatory to recite *"Ashhadu Anna Ali Un Wali Ullah"* in both Azaan and Iqamah.
@@Rafida_Twelver_Shia_Muslim this seems incorrect and the video clearly shows that it's not part of the Adhan and so can't be obligatory. Pls provide references to which Marja says this. Thank you.
Zarq Naqvi official, clarified from Sunni books, shahada Aliun Waliullah, even on the portal of paradise, complete kalima written. If Aliun Waliullah shahada bear witness Aliun Waliullah, automatically caliphs khilafat gets invalidated, nullified.
Why not say Abu bakar waliullah...as abu bakar is the first sahaba..given name as siddique.
You are free to say whatever you wish. However, the claims you have made have not been proven true in the Ahlulbayt school. We have covered this in detail in Chapter 3.
is it mandatory to use it in prayer or is that also recommended?
If you are not considering it as an obligatory part of Salah then you are allowed to do so. However, please refer to your scholar/Marje for more details.
@@Thaqlain thank you
I’m Shia so I say this but why in the Quran they also define shirk as taking an other wali than Allah? What is Wali exactly? And is it the correct word to use to refer to Ghadeer event considering this?
Allah in the Quran mentions himself, the Prophet, and Imam Ali as Wali. So the point of consideration is 'besides'. Any Wali besides Allah is shirk. Any Wali from Allah is Tawheed.
@@Thaqlain thank you for this explanation I was feeling a bit confused when reciting my adhan as I don’t know Arabic so well but still I know what my intention was to attest Ali wilaya but can you cite me where in the Quran he mentioned himself , Muhammad and Ali respectively as wali?
Surah Maida, Verse 55.
@@Thaqlain Salam Sir. I checked verse 55 Surah Maidah. No explicit mention of Syedna Ali RA. Just Allah, Muhammad SAW and true believers of Islam who pray salat and give alms. That can include any of Prophet SAW's companions, not just Hazrat Ali RA as you claim. Hazrat Abu Bakar, Uthman, Umar, Bilal, Zayd RA and many more were also true believers.
better than sleeping😂😂
You are nobody to add something to Azaan...we will recite azaan recited by all Imams and Muhammad SAWW
Were you there at the times of the Prophet and the Imams?
@@Thaqlain I wasn't or not the fact he himself accepting is that it was added later on if you permit adding Ali un Wali ullah to Azaan than why not in Namaz???All things we are following of our Imams and in Azan we are changing it
We believe Sayed has explained in detail about the mustahab parts of a mustahab act. Namaz is a wajib act. And you are allowed to say it as far it you don't consider it to be a part of Namaz.
@@Thaqlain We had Marja here in Pakistan Who died three days ago May Allah grant him highest place in Jannah Ameen...He said that adding Ali un wali ullah in Azaan makes it Baatil and he also told about its history it was added back in 6th century by Iranian and in 15th century Ali un Wali ullah was added in Namaz So now people are defending Ali un wali ullah in Azan but not in Namaz Isn't that double standard
There is no difference in what H.E Muhammad Hussain said and the matters found in this video.