thanks for this video! I will go with Canon 35mm since it performs slightly better in low light and sharper overall. It probably has a better resale value too if I ever want to sell it. I'm renting one this month and can't wait to try it!
The sigma 35mm 1.4 art was early in the series and is probably the weakest. The 50mm and 85mm are jaw dropping. Still, the 35 is outstanding. I'm not entirely sure I agree with your point of view: I rate the sigma more highly than the Canon and I have both. Opinions are like -
Greetings from Czech Republic, You make great videos, great reviews, Canon EF 35mm f/1,4 L is my favourite lens.I live 45 km from České Budějovice (hometown of original Budvar beer) and 110 km from Plzeň (hometown of Pilsner beer) :) and I see You have Budweiser Blvd. on the wall :) Is your favourite Budvar or is there another idea behind this lettering ? Have a nice day :)
how you're doing my brother it's so good to talk to somebody who also have the same camera as me. i have the 16-35 mark 2 lens and the 50mm lens i want to get the sigma 18-35 but should i get that even though i have the 16-35 L series lens? i want the 55-250 and the 15-85 lens i was told they are some good lens and they're cheap ya see. i want another good prime len like the 35 for portraits. i want the 1. 15-85 2. 55-250 3. 24mm 4. 24-105 5.35mm 6. 18-35 i think having 8 lens should be good and i don't have to go with full frame if i don't want to right i think camera is good enough
Canon also cheaps out on warranties despite their lenses being so expensive. Here in Canada, Sigma lenses have 7 year warranties, Canons only have 1 year.
I only buy Canon or Zeiss. I once tried a Sigma 100-400 zoom, when the AF failed there were no parts available to repair it. And I thought Sigma's attitude stank. Longevity matters. I own the Canon 35mm f1.4 L II and think it's truly excellent. You forgot to mention that the Canon has blue-spectrum diffractive optics, as does the Canon RF 85mm f1.2 L. Here's what Roger Cicala (CEO of Lens Rentals) had to say: 'The new second generation Canon 35mm f/1.4 II lens is a massive upgrade over the original version. (And the original version was an outstanding lens.) It’s sharper, particularly at the edges and corners, wide open. It’s built to an amazing level of over-engineering. It really is, simply, as good as it gets. That being said, if you aren’t going to shoot at f/1.4, the Canon 35mm f/2 IS lens is nearly as good optically, has image stabilization, is a lot smaller, and a lot less expensive.'
I went with the Sigma, based on price and advertised sharpness. However the autofocus misses 50% of the time, making me not want to use it 100% of the time.
Great review but you ignore the elephant in the room! I can get the Sigma in a mount for my Nikons whereas I cannot get the Canon. It is therefore irrelevant however good it might be.
Hello sir, I'm confused about 2 lens, Sigma 35mm f1.4 art DG HSM & Tamron 35mm f1.4 SP .. Which lens produce best image color, best sharpness & best bokeh ??? Please suggest me which one should I buy ?? I'm Nikon D750 user. Please help me 🙏🙏🙏
Just love Sigma 35mm F1.4 it has never let me down
thanks for this video! I will go with Canon 35mm since it performs slightly better in low light and sharper overall. It probably has a better resale value too if I ever want to sell it. I'm renting one this month and can't wait to try it!
Wow such a brilliant review. 🎉 Thank you for going through all the points. It made my decision much easier.
35mm isn't "wide." It is literally the most neutral focal length. Not wide or long.
Thanks. Just the type of video I was looking for and recent compared to other videos
Your video description says you’re reviewing the Sigma 150-600 in this video.
Thanks for spotting the mistake! all updated now 🙏🏻
Very clearly to compare 2 lenses. Thanks for your sharing!
The sigma 35mm 1.4 art was early in the series and is probably the weakest. The 50mm and 85mm are jaw dropping. Still, the 35 is outstanding. I'm not entirely sure I agree with your point of view: I rate the sigma more highly than the Canon and I have both. Opinions are like -
can you do a version I vs II?
Just the info I was looking for. Thanks 4 sharing.
for me focusing and optic performance is the preferred.
Greetings from Czech Republic, You make great videos, great reviews, Canon EF 35mm f/1,4 L is my favourite lens.I live 45 km from České Budějovice (hometown of original Budvar beer) and 110 km from Plzeň (hometown of Pilsner beer) :) and I see You have Budweiser Blvd. on the wall :) Is your favourite Budvar or is there another idea behind this lettering ? Have a nice day :)
That is wild. Everyone raves about the Sigma version...now I have to try it for myself.
how you're doing my brother it's so good to talk to somebody who also have the same camera as me. i have the 16-35 mark 2 lens and the 50mm lens i want to get the sigma 18-35 but should i get that even though i have the 16-35 L series lens? i want the 55-250 and the 15-85 lens i was told they are some good lens and they're cheap ya see. i want another good prime len like the 35 for portraits. i want the
1. 15-85
2. 55-250
3. 24mm
4. 24-105
5.35mm
6. 18-35
i think having 8 lens should be good and i don't have to go with full frame if i don't want to right i think camera is good enough
can you do sigma 35 1.4 vs Tamron 1.4 video ??
Canon also cheaps out on warranties despite their lenses being so expensive. Here in Canada, Sigma lenses have 7 year warranties, Canons only have 1 year.
In Australia Canon warranty is 5 years, Sigma is 2... World is upside down lol
24 minutes of talking and not pictures. I prefer a review showing pictures samples and fewer talk, 5 to 10 minutes of duration.
Watch a different channel lol…
I only buy Canon or Zeiss. I once tried a Sigma 100-400 zoom, when the AF failed there were no parts available to repair it. And I thought Sigma's attitude stank. Longevity matters. I own the Canon 35mm f1.4 L II and think it's truly excellent. You forgot to mention that the Canon has blue-spectrum diffractive optics, as does the Canon RF 85mm f1.2 L.
Here's what Roger Cicala (CEO of Lens Rentals) had to say: 'The new second generation Canon 35mm f/1.4 II lens is a massive upgrade over the original version. (And the original version was an outstanding lens.) It’s sharper, particularly at the edges and corners, wide open. It’s built to an amazing level of over-engineering. It really is, simply, as good as it gets. That being said, if you aren’t going to shoot at f/1.4, the Canon 35mm f/2 IS lens is nearly as good optically, has image stabilization, is a lot smaller, and a lot less expensive.'
8:32 vigneting.
I went with the Sigma, based on price and advertised sharpness. However the autofocus misses 50% of the time, making me not want to use it 100% of the time.
Great review but you ignore the elephant in the room! I can get the Sigma in a mount for my Nikons whereas I cannot get the Canon. It is therefore irrelevant however good it might be.
22:43 you can also buy an used Canon of the 1st generation (but, certainly is worse than these two).
The price difference is not justified especially since the Sigma has better micro-contrast.
Ever so slightly count anyone?
Hello sir,
I'm confused about 2 lens, Sigma 35mm f1.4 art DG HSM & Tamron 35mm f1.4 SP ..
Which lens produce best image color, best sharpness & best bokeh ???
Please suggest me which one should I buy ??
I'm Nikon D750 user.
Please help me 🙏🙏🙏
tamron ofcourse